UNASSIGNED: The effectiveness of dietary therapy to induce remission of eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) has been evaluated over the last decades and summarized in meta-analyses. Choosing the dietary modality, identifying the most suitable patients, and implementing specific prerequisites are essential to ensure long-term success.
UNASSIGNED: Impractical exclusive elemental diets provided the highest remission rates in EoE; however, they are not recommended due to their numerous disadvantages and detrimental effects on patient quality of life. Allergy testing-guided diets for EoE are limited; their insufficient effectiveness and low reproducibility are due to poor accuracy of skin or serum test results in identifying EoE food triggers. Initial experiences with a six-food elimination diet have provided evidence of high and predictive effectiveness rates and paved the way for less restrictive and more efficient step-up approaches, including four-food, two-food, and most recently, milk elimination diets. Dietary treatment for EoE is challenging for patients and families and requires certain skills to ensure success in the short and long term.
UNASSIGNED: The selection of appropriate patients is essential to ensure the success of and long-term adherence to dietary treatment of EoE. As normal triggers for EoE are commonly found in the staple diet, it is important to ensure adequate nutritional substitutes to avoid nutrient deficiency risks when long-lasting feeding difficulties or extensive restrictions are present. Specialized facilities in dietary therapy should adopt patient-centered and personalized approaches in order to provide timely monitoring and support for complex cases.

UNASSIGNED: The Swiss Eosinophilic Esophagitis Cohort Study (SEECS) is a national cohort that was established in 2015 with the aim of improving quality of care of affected adults with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). Between 2020 and 2022, paper questionnaires were gradually replaced by fully electronic data capture using Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap®) software. We aim to provide an update of the SEECS 8 years after its launch.
UNASSIGNED: The SEECS prospectively includes adults (≥18 years of age) with EoE as well as patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and healthy control subjects (HC). Upon inclusion and follow-up (typically once every 12-18 months), patients and physicians complete REDCap® questionnaires, which are available in German, French, and English. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) and biologic findings are assessed on the same day using validated instruments (EEsAI PRO for symptoms; EoE-QoL-A for QoL; EREFS for endoscopic activity; modified EoE-HSS for histologic activity). The SEECS biobank includes biosamples from patients with EoE, GERD, and HC.
UNASSIGNED: As of July 2023, the SEECS included 778 patients (716 [92%] with EoE, 29 [3.8%] with GERD, and 33 [4.2%] HC; 559/778 [71.9%] were male). Mean age ± SD (years) at enrollment according to diagnosis was as follows: EoE 41.9 ± 12.9, GERD 53.6 ± 16.4, HC 51.7 ± 17.2. Concomitant GERD was found in 200 patients (27.9%) of the EoE cohort. Concomitant allergic disorders (asthma, rhinoconjunctivitis, eczema) were present in 500 EoE patients (74.4%). At inclusion, 686 (95.8%) of EoE patients were on ongoing treatment (orodispersible budesonide tablet [Jorveza®] in 281 patients [41%]; budesonide or fluticasone syrup or swallowed powder in 290 patients [42.3%]; proton-pump inhibitors in 162 patients [23.6%]; elimination diets in 103 patients [15%]; and esophageal dilation at last visit in 166 patients [24.2%]). A total of 8,698 biosamples were collected, of which 1,395 (16%) were used in the framework of translational research projects.
UNASSIGNED: SEECS continuously grows and is operational using fully electronic data capture. SEECS offers up-to-date epidemiologic and real-world clinical efficacy data on EoE and promotes clinical and translational research.

UNASSIGNED: Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is an immune-mediated esophageal disease characterized by symptoms related to esophageal dysfunction and eosinophil-predominant inflammation. The aims of our study included (1) to assess esophageal motility patterns of EoE by topographic analysis of high-resolution manometry (HRM) and (2) to establish a relationship between symptoms of EoE and motility abnormalities seen on HRM.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study in which all adult patients over 18 years of age with EoE diagnosed by endoscopy and histology and who underwent HRM were included in the study during the study period. Motility patterns in patients with EoE under HRM were analyzed. Data were presented as frequencies and percentages with inference by Pearson\'s chi-square test or Fisher\'s exact test.
UNASSIGNED: Seven hundred patients diagnosed with EoE were noted, and of these, 38 patients had undergone esophageal HRM. Fifty-eight percent of these patients were noted to have an esophageal motility abnormality on HRM. Thirty-seven percent of the patients showed absent peristalsis with pan-esophageal pressurization but normal integrate relaxation pressure; 21% of the patients showed peristaltic dysfunction; and 42% of the patients had a normal HRM. Seventy-one percent of the patients with pan-esophageal pressurization presented with food impaction requiring endoscopy for disimpaction and esophageal dilation (P = .015).
UNASSIGNED: The most common abnormality noted was aperistalsis with pan-esophageal pressurization. This abnormality correlated with the clinical presentation of bolus impaction requiring an endoscopic intervention (P = .015).

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic type 2 inflammatory disease characterized by an eosinophilic inflammatory infiltrate in the esophagus, leading to remodeling, stricture formation, and fibrosis. Triggered by food and aeroallergens, type 2 cytokines interleukin (IL)-4, IL-13, IL-5 produced by CD4+ T helper 2 cells (Th2), eosinophils, mast cells, basophils, and type 2 innate lymphoid cells alter the esophageal epithelial barrier and increase inflammatory cell tissue infiltration. Clustering analysis based on the expression of type 2 inflammatory genes demonstrated the diversity of EoE endotypes. Despite the availability of treatment options for patients with EoE, which include dietary restriction, proton pump inhibitors, swallowed topical steroids, and esophageal dilation, there are still no Food and Drug Administration-approved medications for this disease; as such, there are clear unmet medical needs for these patients. A number of novel biologic therapies currently in clinical trials represent a promising avenue for targeted therapeutic approaches in EoE. This review summarizes our current knowledge on the role of type 2 inflammatory cells and mediators in EoE disease pathogenesis, as well as the future treatment landscape targeting underlying inflammation in EoE.

UNASSIGNED: A key unknown in eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is the long-term course of esophageal stenosis. Our aim was to evaluate the course of esophageal strictures using structured serial esophagrams and determine predictors of diameter improvement in patients with EoE.
UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective study of 78 EoE patients who completed 2 structured esophagrams at an academic tertiary referral center between 2003 and 2021. Maximum and minimum esophageal diameters were measured during esophagram using a standardized protocol to reduce measurement errors.
UNASSIGNED: The median age at first esophagram was 36.2 (12.9-64.3) years; 60.3% of patients were male; 41 patients had active EoE; and 9 were inactive. Of the patients, 39.7% had allergic rhinitis, asthma (32.1%), and atopic dermatitis (7.7%). Medical therapies at second esophagram and esophagogastroduodenoscopy included proton pump inhibitors (39.5%), swallowed topical steroids (31.6%), diet elimination (13.2%), biologic therapies (1.3%), and clinical trial medications (1.3%). Median maximum diameter significantly increased by 1.0 mm (Q1: -1.0 mm, Q3: 3.0 mm) (P = .034), independent of dilation (P = .744). Increase was most profound in patients starting in the lowest maximum diameter group (9-15 mm) with median increase of 3.0 mm. For patients in disease remission at the second esophagram, there was a significant increase in maximum diameter per year compared to active disease at 0.8 mm (Q1: 0.0 mm, Q3: 5.3 mm) and 0.0 mm (Q1: -0.4 mm, Q3: 0.6 mm) respectively (P = .019).
UNASSIGNED: Long-term improvement in esophageal strictures in patients with EoE may occur but is modest and likely occurs over years. Progression also appears to be minimal. Continuous medical treatment may reduce the rate of stricture recurrence and may improve stricture diameter over time.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are chronic inflammatory disorders of the gastrointestinal tract, with EoE predominantly provoked by food and aeroallergens, whereas IBD is driven by a broader spectrum of immunopathological and environmental triggers. This review presents a comprehensive comparison of the pathophysiological and therapeutic strategies for EoE and IBD. We examine the current understanding of their underlying mechanisms, particularly the interplay between environmental factors and genetic susceptibility. A crucial element in both diseases is the integrity of the epithelial barrier, whose disruption plays a central role in their pathogenesis. The involvement of eosinophils, mast cells, B cells, T cells, dendritic cells, macrophages, and their associated cytokines is examined, highlighting the importance of targeting cytokine signaling pathways to modulate immune-epithelial interactions. We propose that advances in computation tools will uncover the significance of G-protein coupled receptors (GPCRs) in connecting immune and epithelial cells, leading to novel therapies for EoE and IBD.

BACKGROUND: Eosinophilic esophagitis is a chronic inflammatory disorder of the esophagus. This real-world study used patient and physician surveys to describe the clinical characteristics and disease burden of eosinophilic esophagitis-overall and in a subgroup of patients with dysphagia despite treatment.
METHODS: Data analyzed in this study were collected in 2020 from US and EU patients with eosinophilic esophagitis. Eligible patients were aged ≥ 12 years with a diagnosis of eosinophilic esophagitis, had an esophageal count of ≥ 15 eosinophils/high-power field at diagnosis, and were currently prescribed treatment for eosinophilic esophagitis.
RESULTS: Overall, 1001 patients were included, of whom 356 (36%) had dysphagia despite treatment. Demographics and clinical characteristics were similar in both populations. The severity of eosinophilic esophagitis was mild in more patients overall (69%) versus those with dysphagia despite treatment (48%). Patient disease history was similar in both populations, with some exceptions: common patient-reported symptoms were dysphagia (70% and 86%) and heartburn/acid reflux (55% and 49%), and common physician-reported symptoms were dysphagia (75% and 91%) and food impaction (46% and 52%). Treatment history was similar in both populations; overall, the most common treatments were proton pump inhibitors (83%) and topical corticosteroids (51%). Patients reported slightly more days with symptoms, higher impacts on activities of daily living, and slightly higher anxiety or depression in the dysphagia-despite-treatment population versus the overall population.
CONCLUSIONS: Eosinophilic esophagitis presents severe symptoms and comorbidities that substantially impact patients\' well-being and quality of life. Greater awareness of and novel treatments for eosinophilic esophagitis are needed.

Allergic disease prevalence has increased globally with the subset of type 2 inflammatory diseases playing a substantial role. Type 2 inflammatory diseases may differ in clinical presentation, but they exhibit shared pathophysiology that is targeted by the unique pharmacology of dupilumab. Dupilumab binds to the interleukin (IL)-4 receptor alpha subunit (IL-4Rα) that blocks IL-4 and IL-13 signaling, two key drivers of type 2 inflammation. Herein, we review the mechanism of action and pharmacology of dupilumab, and the clinical evidence that led to the regulatory approvals of dupilumab for the treatment of numerous type 2 inflammatory diseases: atopic dermatitis, asthma, chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyposis, eosinophilic esophagitis, and prurigo nodularis.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is a chronic type 2 inflammation-mediated disease characterized by an eosinophil-predominant inflammation of the esophagus and symptoms of esophageal dysfunction. Relevant treatment outcomes in the setting of EoE include the improvement of histology, symptoms, and endoscopy findings, quality of life (QoL), and the psychological burden of the disease. Established validated tools for the assessment of EoE include questionnaires on dysphagia and QoL (ie, DSQ, EEsAI, and EoE-IQ). More recently, esophageal symptom-specific anxiety and hypervigilance, assessed using the esophageal hypervigilance and anxiety scale (EHAS), have emerged as contributors to disease burden, confirming the importance of psychological aspects in EoE patients. The EoE endoscopic reference score (EREFS) is the only validated endoscopy score in EoE and can quantify mucosal disease burden. However, esophageal panometry using the functional lumen imaging probe (FLIP) and high-resolution manometry (HRM) have shown potential to optimize the assessment of fibrostenotic features of EoE, providing novel insights into the pathophysiology of symptoms. There is a growing number of licenced and off-label therapeutic options in EoE, with various randomized controlled trials demonstrating the efficacy of proton pump inhibitors, topical steroids, food elimination diets, biological drugs, and esophageal dilatation. However, standardized optimal management strategies of EoE are currently lacking. In this review, we provide an overview of established and novel assessment tools in EoE including patient reported outcomes, FLIP panometry, HRM, endoscopy, and histology outcome measures to improve the outcomes of EoE patients. In addition, we summarize available therapeutic options for EoE based on the most recent evidence.

BACKGROUND: Several dietary approaches have been used to induce remission in patients with eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE), yielding varied results.
METHODS: We searched the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases up to May 2024 to identify studies including dietary interventions for EoE used as monotherapy. Summary estimates with 95% CIs for achieving <15 eosinophils/HPF were calculated for each approach. Fixed or random effects models were used depending on heterogeneity (I2); publication bias risks were assessed using funnel plot analyses. Subgroup analyses results were compared using meta-regression.
RESULTS: Forty-three studies with 2825 patients were included in quantitative summaries. The overall rate of histologic remission was 60.6% (95% CI, 54.6-66.5%). Effectiveness rates were 94.5% (95% CI, 92.3-96.4%) for elemental diets, 63.9% (95% CI, 58.5-69.2%) for six-food elimination diets, 54.7% (95% CI, 45.7-63.6%) for four-food elimination diets, 44.3% (95% CI, 36.1-52.8%) for two-food elimination diets, 46.4% (95% CI, 40-52.9%) for one-food elimination diets, and 39.5% (95% CI, 30.3-49.2%) for allergy testing-directed food elimination diets. Overall, superior efficacy was noted in children than in adults and in retrospective compared to prospective studies.
CONCLUSIONS: Diet therapy remains an effective therapeutic asset for pediatric and adult patients with EoE, with increasing efficacy noted as the levels of dietary restriction increase.