Cyclin-Dependent Kinase 6

细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶 6
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)联合内分泌治疗在无进展生存期和总生存期方面具有显著的临床获益。这项研究调查了激素受体(HR)阳性转移性和复发性乳腺癌患者中与两种CDK4/6i相关的结果,以告知治疗策略的现实证据。
    方法:这项回顾性研究纳入了台北市荣民总医院340例HR阳性晚期乳腺癌台湾患者,2018年至2023年。我们分析了病人的特点,与两个CDK4/6i相关的治疗策略和结果。还调查了在国家健康保险(NHI)报销2年后经历经济负担并中断CDK4/6i治疗的患者的疗效。
    结果:接受瑞博西尼和帕博西尼治疗的患者在年龄上没有显著差异,组织学,体重指数(BMI),或病理状态。两组之间的疾病状态和内分泌治疗伙伴的分布具有可比性。剂量减少是相似的,而palbociclib患者倾向于停止使用CDK4/6i,和那些与ribociclib倾向于切换到其他CDK4/6i或内分泌伴侣。在一线设置中,两个CDK4/6i之间的无进展生存期(PFS)没有显着差异。不良预后因素是HER2IHC评分增加,更高的Ki-67水平,内脏和肝转移,先前的化疗,和内分泌治疗抵抗,虽然BMI较高,仅骨转移,来曲唑治疗与较低的进展风险相关.根据NHI报销政策,我们研究中有限的随访时间不足以评估中断CDK4/6i治疗长达两年的患者的预后。
    结论:两种CDK4/6i的治疗结果没有显著差异,表明CDK4/6i对亚洲人群的安全性和有效性。在现实世界中,Ribociclib和palbociclib在PFS中显示出相似的功效。
    OBJECTIVE: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) combined with endocrine therapy have demonstrated significant clinical benefits in progression-free and overall survival. This study investigates the outcomes associated with two kinds of CDK4/6i in patients with hormone receptor (HR)-positive metastatic and relapsed breast cancer to inform real-world evidence of treatment strategies.
    METHODS: This retrospective study included 340 Taiwanese patients with HR-positive advanced breast cancer from the Taipei Veterans General Hospital, between 2018 and 2023. We analyzed patient characteristics, treatment strategies and outcomes associated with two CDK4/6i. The efficacy of patients who experienced economic burden and interrupted CDK4/6i treatment after 2 years of National Health Insurance (NHI) reimbursement was also investigated.
    RESULTS: Patients receiving ribociclib and palbociclib showed no significant differences in age, histology, body mass index(BMI), or pathologic status. The distribution of disease status and endocrine therapy partners was comparable between the two groups. Dose reduction was similar, while patients with palbociclib tended to discontinue CDK4/6i usage, and those with ribociclib tended to switch to the other CDK4/6i or endocrine partners. There was no significant difference in progression-free survival (PFS) between the two CDK4/6i in the first-line setting. Adverse prognostic factors were increasing HER2 IHC score, higher Ki-67 levels, visceral and liver metastasis, prior chemotherapy, and endocrine therapy resistance, while higher BMI, bone-only metastasis, and letrozole treatment were associated with a lower risk of progression. The limited follow-up time in our study was insufficient to assess the outcomes of patients treated with interrupted CDK4/6i for up to two years under the NHI reimbursement policy.
    CONCLUSIONS: Treatment outcomes between the two types of CDK4/6i did not differ significantly, indicating the safety and efficacy of CDK4/6i for the Asian population. Ribociclib and palbociclib showed similar efficacy in PFS in the real-world setting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6(CDK4/6)抑制剂标志着乳腺癌治疗的一个里程碑。由于不良反应对治疗决策和患者预后的潜在影响,仔细考虑CDK4/6抑制剂的不同毒性是至关重要的,作为三种抑制剂-palbociclib,abemaciclib,和ribociclib-已被批准在不良事件概况方面存在差异。然而,临床试验的局限性需要紧急的真实世界安全性研究来评估和比较这些CDK4/6抑制剂的不良事件(AE)风险.因此,本研究旨在分析CDK4/6抑制剂的不良事件,为临床药物选择提供见解,使用真实世界的数据库。
    方法:分析FDA不良事件报告系统(2015-2022)中CDK4/6抑制剂的不良事件。使用四种不成比例的方法来检测安全性信号:报告优势比(ROR),比例报告比率,贝叶斯置信神经网络传播,和多项目伽玛泊松收缩器。Venn分析用于比较和选择常见和特定的AE。
    结果:本研究包括73,042例接受帕博西尼治疗的患者,25,142与ribociclib,7563和abemaciclib。所有三种抑制剂均具有27种常见的AE。Palbociclib表现出最高的血液毒性ROR,虽然ribociclib对巨细胞病的ROR最高,指甲疾病,和肝脏病变。Abemaciclib表现出最高的粘膜毒性ROR。palbociclib和ribociclib的共同信号包括血液学毒性,免疫反应性降低,和口疮溃疡。骨髓抑制,口腔疼痛,假性肝硬化是palbociclib和abemaciclib的常见信号。贫血,肝毒性,观察到肺炎是ribociclib和abemaciclib的常见信号。此外,与palbociclib相关的特定AE包括疲劳,脱发,和口腔炎。对于ribociclib,特异性AE包括心电图QT延长,血小板减少症,和减少血红蛋白。Abemaciclib特别与腹泻有关,呕吐,和间质性肺病.
    结论:我们的分析显示palbociclib表现出更高的血液学毒性风险。Ribociclib显示出较高的肝毒性风险,肾毒性,和QT延长。Abemaciclib显示肝毒性的风险更高,胃肠道的影响,间质性肺病,和血栓形成。这些发现为CDK4/6抑制剂选择提供了有价值的见解。
    BACKGROUND: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors marked a milestone in the breast cancer treatment. Due to the potential impact of adverse effects on treatment decisions and patient outcomes, careful consideration of the varying toxicities of CDK4/6 inhibitors is crucial, as three inhibitors-palbociclib, abemaciclib, and ribociclib-have been approved with differences in adverse event profiles. However, limitations in clinical trials call for urgent real-world safety studies to evaluate and compare the risk of adverse events (AEs) among these CDK4/6 inhibitors. Therefore, this study aimed to analyze AEs of CDK4/6 inhibitors and provide insights for clinical drug selection, using real world database.
    METHODS: The AEs of CDK4/6 inhibitors in the FDA Adverse Event Reporting System (2015-2022) were analyzed. Four disproportionality methods were used to detect safety signals: reporting odds ratio (ROR), proportional reporting ratio, Bayesian Confidence Neural Network Propagation, and Multi-Item Gamma Poisson Shrinker. Venn analysis was used to compare and select common and specific AEs.
    RESULTS: This study included 73,042 patients treated with palbociclib, 25,142 with ribociclib, and 7563 with abemaciclib. All three inhibitors had 27 common AEs. Palbociclib exhibited the highest ROR for hematologic toxicities, while ribociclib showed the highest ROR for macrocytosis, nail disorders, and hepatic lesions. Abemaciclib displayed the highest ROR for mucosal toxicity. Common signals for both palbociclib and ribociclib included hematologic toxicities, decreased immune responsiveness, and aphthous ulcers. Myelosuppression, oral pain, and pseudocirrhosis were common signals for palbociclib and abemaciclib. Anemia, hepatotoxicity, and pneumonitis were observed as common signals for ribociclib and abemaciclib. Furthermore, specific AEs associated with palbociclib included fatigue, alopecia, and stomatitis. For ribociclib, specific AEs included electrocardiogram QT prolongation, thrombocytopenia, and decreased hemoglobin. Abemaciclib was specifically linked to diarrhea, vomiting, and interstitial lung disease.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis revealed that palbociclib showed a higher risk of hematologic toxicity. Ribociclib showed higher risks of hepatotoxicity, nephrotoxicity, and QT prolongation. Abemaciclib showed higher risks of hepatotoxicity, gastrointestinal effects, interstitial lung disease, and thrombosis. These findings provide valuable insights for CDK4/6 inhibitor selection.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    衰老细胞的积累促进衰老和与年龄有关的疾病,但是衰老细胞用来逃避免疫清除并在组织中积累的分子机制仍有待阐明。在这里,我们报道了p16阳性衰老细胞上调免疫检查点蛋白程序性死亡配体1(PD-L1)在衰老和慢性炎症中积累。我们显示p16介导的细胞周期激酶CDK4/6抑制通过下调其泛素依赖性降解诱导衰老细胞中的PD-L1稳定性。表达p16的衰老肺泡巨噬细胞会升高PD-L1,从而促进免疫抑制环境,从而增加衰老细胞的负担。用激活效应细胞上的Fcγ受体的抗PD-L1抗体处理导致PD-L1和p16阳性细胞的消除。我们的研究揭示了衰老细胞中p16依赖性调节PD-L1蛋白稳定性的分子机制,并揭示了靶向PD-L1改善衰老细胞免疫监视和改善衰老相关炎症的潜力。
    The accumulation of senescent cells promotes ageing and age-related diseases, but molecular mechanisms that senescent cells use to evade immune clearance and accumulate in tissues remain to be elucidated. Here we report that p16-positive senescent cells upregulate the immune checkpoint protein programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) to accumulate in ageing and chronic inflammation. We show that p16-mediated inhibition of cell cycle kinases CDK4/6 induces PD-L1 stability in senescent cells via downregulation of its ubiquitin-dependent degradation. p16-expressing senescent alveolar macrophages elevate PD-L1 to promote an immunosuppressive environment that can contribute to an increased burden of senescent cells. Treatment with activating anti-PD-L1 antibodies engaging Fcγ receptors on effector cells leads to the elimination of PD-L1 and p16-positive cells. Our study uncovers a molecular mechanism of p16-dependent regulation of PD-L1 protein stability in senescent cells and reveals the potential of targeting PD-L1 to improve immunosurveillance of senescent cells and ameliorate senescence-associated inflammation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    事实上,人类表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)-低组,历史上在乳腺癌组织学中被分类为HER2阴性,与HER2阳性组相似,受益于HER2靶向治疗表明该组具有与HER2-0组不同的组织学.细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂的有效性,这是激素受体阳性的标准一线治疗方法,HER2阴性晚期乳腺癌,在这个新定义的组织学亚组中,仍然是一个争论的话题。在我们的研究中,我们研究了HER2状态对CDK4/6抑制剂疗效的影响.我们的研究是回顾性的,多中心,现实世界的数据分析。一百六十名患者被纳入研究。HER2状态与其他临床病理特征之间的关系,以及无进展生存期,被检查过。中位随访时间为20.33±0.98个月。无法访问mPFS。所有患者均表现为雌激素受体阳性表达。在患者中,111(69.4%)被归类为HER2-0,49(30.6%)被归类为HER2低。HER2-0和低HER2患者的24个月无进展生存率相似(60.6%vs65.3%,激素受体:1.18,CI:0.67-2.20,P=.554)。我们确定,使用细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂作为晚期乳腺癌患者的一线治疗所实现的mPFS不受HER2状态的影响。
    The fact that the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-low group, historically classified as HER2 negative in breast cancer histology, benefited from HER2-targeted treatments similarly to the HER2-positive group indicates that this group has a distinct histology from the HER2-0 group. The effectiveness of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors, which are the standard first-line treatment for hormone receptor-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer, in this newly defined histological subgroup remains a topic of debate. In our study, we examined the impact of HER2 status on the efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors. Our study is a retrospective, multicenter, real-world data analysis. One hundred sixty patients were included in the study. The relationship between HER2 status and other clinical-pathological features, as well as progression-free survival, was examined. Median follow-up was 20.33 ± 0.98 months. The mPFS could not be reached. All patients exhibited positive estrogen receptor expression. Among the patients, 111 (69.4%) were categorized as HER2-0, and 49 (30.6%) as HER2-low. The 24-month progression-free survival rates were similar between HER2-0 and HER2-low patients (60.6% vs 65.3%, hormone receptor: 1.18, CI: 0.67-2.20, P = .554). We established that the mPFS achieved with cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors as a first-line therapy for patients with advanced breast cancer is unaffected by HER2 status.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心肌梗死严重威胁老年人的健康,减少心肌损伤对MI的治疗具有重要意义。LncRNA-TTN-AS1对心肌细胞损伤有保护作用,而TTN-AS1在MI中的作用尚不清楚。CCK8,流式细胞术,和JC-1染色评估细胞活力,细胞凋亡和线粒体膜电位(MMP),分别。测量细胞活性氧(ROS)和分泌的乳酸脱氢酶(LDH)水平。使用ChIP探索了ELF5,TTN-AS1,PCBP2和CDK6之间的相互作用,荧光素酶报告分析,RIP,和下拉。使用TTC评估小鼠MI的严重程度,H&E,和TUNEL染色。数据显示OGD/R显著诱导ROS,AC16细胞线粒体损伤与凋亡,而ELF5或TTN-AS1的过表达逆转了这些现象。ELF5通过与其启动子结合而转录激活TTN-AS1。TTN-AS1通过募集PCBP2增加CDK6稳定性。CDK6敲低消除了TTN-AS1过表达对OGD/R诱导的心肌损伤的抑制作用。此外,TTN-AS1或ELF5的过表达通过上调CDK6减轻小鼠MI进展。总的来说,ELF5转录调控的TTN-AS1通过募集PCBP2增加CDK6的稳定性,减轻MI过程中的心肌细胞凋亡和损伤,这为探索对抗MI的新策略提供了新的思路。
    Myocardial infarction (MI) seriously threatens the health of elderly people, and reducing myocardial injury is of great significance for the treatment of MI. LncRNA-TTN-AS1 shows protective effects on cardiomyocyte injury, while the role of TTN-AS1 in MI remains unknown. CCK8, flow cytometry, and JC-1 staining assessed cell viability, apoptosis and mitochondrial membrane potential (MMP), respectively. Cellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) and secreted lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) levels were measured. The interactions between ELF5, TTN-AS1, PCBP2 and CDK6 were explored using ChIP, luciferase reporter assay, RIP, and pull-down. The severity of MI in mice was evaluated using TTC, H&E, and TUNEL staining. The data revealed that OGD/R significantly induced ROS, mitochondrial injury and apoptosis in AC16 cells, while overexpression of ELF5 or TTN-AS1 reversed these phenomena. ELF5 transcriptionally activated TTN-AS1 through binding with its promoter. TTN-AS1 increased CDK6 stability via recruiting PCBP2. CDK6 knockdown abolished the inhibitory effects of TTN-AS1 overexpression on OGD/R-induced myocardial injury. Furthermore, overexpression of TTN-AS1 or ELF5 alleviated MI progression in mice by upregulating CDK6. Collectively, TTN-AS1 transcriptionally regulated by ELF5 alleviated myocardial apoptosis and injury during MI via recruiting PCBP2 to increase CDK6 stability, which shed new lights on exploring new strategies against MI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    受调控的细胞周期进程确保稳态并预防癌症。在增殖细胞中,E3泛素连接酶后酶促进复合物/环体(APC/C)避免了过早的S期进入,尽管降解抑制G1-S进展的APC/C底物尚不完全清楚。APC/C在退出细胞周期的停滞细胞中也很活跃,但目前尚不清楚APC/C是否维持所有类型的逮捕。这里,通过表达APC/C抑制剂,EMI1,我们表明APC/C活性对于防止由药理学细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4和6(CDK4/6)抑制(Palbociclib)阻止的细胞中的S期进入至关重要。因此,抑制细胞周期基因表达需要活性蛋白降解。抑制APC/C的快速而强大的阻止旁路的机制涉及CDK以非典型的顺序作用,以失活视网膜母细胞瘤介导的E2F抑制。使APC/C失活首先引起有丝分裂细胞周期蛋白B的积累,然后促进细胞周期蛋白A的表达。我们认为细胞周期蛋白A是维持阻滞的关键底物,因为抗APC/C细胞周期蛋白A,但不是细胞周期蛋白B,足以诱导S相进入。绕过CDK4/6抑制阻滞的细胞启动DNA复制,来源许可严重减少。同时积累S期许可抑制剂,如细胞周期蛋白A和geminin,使用G1许可激活器破坏了G1-S进展的正常顺序。因此,DNA合成和细胞增殖严重受损。我们的研究结果预测,EMI1表达升高的癌症将倾向于逃避CDK4/6的抑制,未获得许可的S期,并遭受增强的基因组不稳定性。
    Regulated cell cycle progression ensures homeostasis and prevents cancer. In proliferating cells, premature S phase entry is avoided by the E3 ubiquitin ligase anaphasepromoting complex/cyclosome (APC/C), although the APC/C substrates whose degradation restrains G1-S progression are not fully known. The APC/C is also active in arrested cells that exited the cell cycle, but it is not clear whether APC/C maintains all types of arrest. Here, by expressing the APC/C inhibitor, EMI1, we show that APC/C activity is essential to prevent S phase entry in cells arrested by pharmacological cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibition (Palbociclib). Thus, active protein degradation is required for arrest alongside repressed cell cycle gene expression. The mechanism of rapid and robust arrest bypass from inhibiting APC/C involves CDKs acting in an atypical order to inactivate retinoblastoma-mediated E2F repression. Inactivating APC/C first causes mitotic cyclin B accumulation which then promotes cyclin A expression. We propose that cyclin A is the key substrate for maintaining arrest because APC/C-resistant cyclin A, but not cyclin B, is sufficient to induce S phase entry. Cells bypassing arrest from CDK4/6 inhibition initiate DNA replication with severely reduced origin licensing. The simultaneous accumulation of S phase licensing inhibitors, such as cyclin A and geminin, with G1 licensing activators disrupts the normal order of G1-S progression. As a result, DNA synthesis and cell proliferation are profoundly impaired. Our findings predict that cancers with elevated EMI1 expression will tend to escape CDK4/6 inhibition into a premature, underlicensed S phase and suffer enhanced genome instability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在评估孕激素受体(PR)状态对接受CDK4/6抑制剂联合内分泌一线治疗的晚期雌激素受体(ER)-高人类表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性乳腺癌患者预后的影响。
    方法:哈尔滨医科大学附属肿瘤医院收治的晚期ER高HER2阴性乳腺癌患者,接受细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDK)4/6抑制剂联合内分泌一线治疗。患者分为高PR组(11-100%),低PR组(1-10%),和PR阴性组(<1%)根据PR的表达。采用卡方检验分析组间变量的相关性。采用COX回归分析影响生存的危险因素。采用Kaplan-Meier生存曲线分析组间无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)的差异。
    结果:在152名患者中,72是PR高,32是PR低,48例PR阴性。与PR阴性组相比,PR低组和PR高组的无病生存期(DFS)≥5年和Ki-67指数≤30%的比例显著较高.PR阴性患者在24个月内(POD24)发生一线疾病进展的可能性高于PR高(P=0.026)。单因素和多因素分析显示PR阴性和一线POD24的发生是影响生存的危险因素。生存曲线分析显示,与高PR组相比,PR阴性组的PFS和OS显著降低(P=0.001,P=0.036)。一线POD24患者在总体人群以及按PR状态分层的亚组中的OS较短。
    结论:PR阴性和一线POD24的发生是晚期ER高HER2阴性乳腺癌患者接受CDK4/6抑制剂联合内分泌一线治疗的危险因素。PR阴性患者的PFS和OS最短。不管公关状态如何,第一行POD24发生预测操作系统较短。
    BACKGROUND: This study was designed to evaluate the effect of progesterone receptor (PR) status on the prognosis of advanced estrogen receptor (ER)-high human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative breast cancer patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with endocrine as first-line therapy.
    METHODS: Advanced ER-high HER2-negative breast cancer patients who were admitted to Harbin Medical University Cancer Hospital and received cyclin-dependent kinase (CDK)4/6 inhibitor combined with endocrine as first-line therapy were included for analysis. Patients were divided into PR-high group (11-100%), PR-low group (1-10%), and PR-negative group (< 1%) according to the expression of PR. Chi-square test was used to analyze the correlation of variables between groups. COX regression analysis were used to analyze the risk factors of survival. Kaplan-Meier survival curve was used to analyze the differences of progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) between groups.
    RESULTS: Among the 152 patients, 72 were PR-high, 32 were PR-low, and 48 were PR-negative. Compared with PR-negative group, the proportions of disease-free survival (DFS) ≥ 5 years and Ki-67 index ≤ 30% in PR-low group and PR-high group were significant higher. PR-negative patients were more likely to occur first-line progression of disease within 24 months (POD24) than PR-high(P = 0.026). Univariate and multivariate analysis showed that PR-negative and first-line POD24 occurrence were risk factors for survival. Survival curve analysis showed that compared with PR-high group, the PFS and OS were significantly lower in PR-negative group (P = 0.001, P = 0.036, respectively). Patients with first-line POD24 had shorter OS in the overall population as well as in subgroups stratified by PR status.
    CONCLUSIONS: PR-negative and first-line POD24 occurrence were risk factors of advanced ER-high HER2-negative breast cancer patients receiving CDK4/6 inhibitor combined with endocrine as first-line therapy. PR-negative patients had shortest PFS and OS. Regardless of PR status, first-line POD24 occurrence predicted shorter OS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在过去的十年中,细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4/6抑制剂(CDK4/6i)的出现代表了乳腺癌治疗的重大突破。在临床试验和现实环境中,观察到使用CDK4/6i的患者可能会出现精神不良事件(PAEs).在这里,我们进行了一项药物警戒研究,以全面评估CDK4/6i与PAEs之间的相关性.
    方法:我们获得了2015年1月至2023年12月期间提交给FDA不良事件报告系统(FAERS)的个别病例安全性报告。在不相称性分析中,计算每种不良事件-药物组合的报告比值比(ROR)和信息成分(IC)值.应用单因素logistic回归分析探讨CDK4/6i治疗后PAEs的相关因素。
    结果:共确认了95,591份与CDK4/6i相关的报告,6.72%报告PAEs,这一比例呈逐年上升趋势。根据ROR和IC值,17类PAEs定义为CDK4/6i相关PAEs。在这些PAEs中,失眠,压力,饮食失调,情绪低落,睡眠障碍非常常见,每个占CDK4/6i报告的10%以上。Ribociclib显示CDK4/6i相关PAEs的最高风险信号(ROR=1.89[1.75-2.04],IC025=0.79),其次是palbociclib(ROR=1.47[1.41-1.53],IC025=0.49),而abemaciclib没有表现出显著的信号(ROR=0.52[0.44-0.62],IC025=-1.13)。女性性别,年龄小和体重超过80kg是CDK4/6i相关PAEs发生的显著危险因素.
    结论:使用来自现实世界的数据,药物不良反应的大规模自发报告系统,我们的研究描绘了PAEs到CDK4/6i的光谱。这可能为医疗保健专业人员提供有价值的见解,以管理接受CDK4/6i治疗的患者的PAEs风险。特别是那些患有精神疾病的人。
    BACKGROUND: The emergence of cyclin-dependent kinases 4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) represented a major breakthrough in the treatment of breast cancer over the past decade. In both clinical trials and real-world settings, it was observed that patients using CDK4/6i might experience psychiatric adverse events (PAEs). Herein, we conducted a pharmacovigilance study to comprehensively assess the correlation between CDK4/6i and PAEs.
    METHODS: We obtained individual case safety reports submitted to the FDA Adverse Events Reporting System (FAERS) during the period from January 2015 to December 2023. In disproportionality analysis, the reporting odds ratio (ROR) and information component (IC) values were calculated for each adverse event-drug combination. Univariate logistic regression analysis was utilized to explore factors associated with PAEs following CDK4/6i treatment.
    RESULTS: A total of 95,591 reports related to CDK4/6i were identified, with 6.72% reporting PAEs, and this proportion exhibited an annual upward trend. Based on the ROR and IC values, 17 categories of PAEs were defined as CDK4/6i-related PAEs. Among these PAEs, insomnia, stress, eating disorder, depressed mood, and sleep disorder were very common, each accounting for over 10% of CDK4/6i reports. Ribociclib showed the highest risk signal of CDK4/6i-related PAEs (ROR = 1.89[1.75-2.04], IC025 = 0.79), followed by palbociclib (ROR = 1.47[1.41-1.53], IC025 = 0.49), while abemaciclib did not exhibit a significant signal (ROR = 0.52[0.44-0.62], IC025 = -1.13). Female sex, younger age and weight exceeding 80 kg were significant risk factors for the incidence of CDK4/6i-related PAEs.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using data from a real-world, large-scale spontaneous reporting system for adverse drug reactions, our study delineated the spectrum of PAEs to CDK4/6i. This potentially offered valuable insights for healthcare professionals to manage the risk of PAEs in patients receiving CDK4/6i treatment, particularly those with psychiatric disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4和6(CDK4/6)抑制剂,包括abemaciclib,已被批准用于治疗激素受体阳性,人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性晚期,和转移性乳腺癌。尽管CDK4/6抑制剂具有很高的治疗效果,它们与各种不利影响有关,包括潜在致命的间质性肺病.因此,已尝试将CDK4/6抑制剂与来曲唑或氟维司群联合使用,但已证明在减少不良反应方面存在局限性。强调需要开发新的联合疗法。这项研究提出了使用CDK4/6抑制剂和三环抗抑郁药的组合策略,以增强这些抑制剂的治疗效果,同时减少其副作用。在不同的癌细胞系(H460,MCF7和HCT-116)中测试了abemaciclib和地昔帕明的治疗效果。在异种移植结肠肿瘤模型中评估了abemaciclib和地昔帕明联合治疗的抗肿瘤作用。体外细胞研究显示了联合治疗在HCT-116细胞系中的协同抗癌作用。与对照或单一治疗相比,组合治疗显著减小了肿瘤大小,而不引起对正常组织的明显毒性。虽然额外的体内研究是必要的,这项研究表明,abemaciclib和地昔帕明的联合治疗可能是治疗实体瘤的一种新的治疗方法。
    Cyclin-dependent kinase 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitors, including abemaciclib, have been approved for the treatment of hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-negative advanced, and metastatic breast cancer. Despite the high therapeutic efficacy of CDK4/6 inhibitors, they are associated with various adverse effects, including potentially fatal interstitial lung disease. Therefore, a combination of CDK4/6 inhibitors with letrozole or fulvestrant has been attempted but has demonstrated limitations in reducing adverse effects, highlighting the need to develop new combination therapies. This study proposes a combination strategy using CDK4/6 inhibitors and tricyclic antidepressants to enhance the therapeutic outcomes of these inhibitors while reducing their side effects. The therapeutic efficacies of abemaciclib and desipramine were tested in different cancer cell lines (H460, MCF7, and HCT-116). The antitumor effects of the combined abemaciclib and desipramine treatment were evaluated in a xenograft colon tumor model. In vitro cell studies have shown the synergistic anticancer effects of combination therapy in the HCT-116 cell line. The combination treatment significantly reduced tumor size compared with control or single treatment without causing apparent toxicity to normal tissues. Although additional in vivo studies are necessary, this study suggests that the combination therapy of abemaciclib and desipramine may represent a novel therapeutic approach for treating solid tumors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    合成,进行了细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶4和6(CDK4/6)抑制剂和放射性配体的生化评估和放射合成。NT431,一种新合成的4-氟苄基-abemaciclib,对CDK4/6和对四种癌细胞系表现出很高的效力,其IC50与亲本abemaciclib相似。我们进行了两步一锅放射合成,以产生具有良好放射化学产率(9.6±3%,n=3,衰减未校正),高放射化学纯度(>95%),和高摩尔活性(>370GBq/µmol(>10.0Ci/µmol)。体外放射自显影证实[18F]NT431与脑组织中CDK4/6的特异性结合。动态PET成像支持[18F]NT431和亲本abemaciclib穿过BBB,尽管大脑摄取适度。因此,我们得出的结论是,NT431或abemaciclib(FDA批准的药物)不太可能以足够的浓度在脑中积累,从而可能有效对抗乳腺癌脑转移或脑癌.然而,尽管BBB渗透率不高,[18F]NT431代表了开发和评估新一代CDK4/6抑制剂的重要一步,该抑制剂具有优异的BBB渗透性,用于治疗和可视化CNS中的CDK4/6阳性肿瘤。此外,[18F]NT431可能在周围肿瘤如乳腺癌和其他CDK4/6阳性肿瘤中具有潜在的应用。
    The synthesis, biochemical evaluation and radiosynthesis of a cyclin-dependent kinases 4 and 6 (CDK4/6) inhibitor and radioligand was performed. NT431, a newly synthesized 4-fluorobenzyl-abemaciclib, exhibited high potency to CDK4/6 and against four cancer cell lines with IC50 similar to that of the parent abemaciclib. We performed a two-step one-pot radiosynthesis to produce [18F]NT431 with good radiochemical yield (9.6 ± 3%, n = 3, decay uncorrected), high radiochemical purity (>95%), and high molar activity (>370 GBq/µmol (>10.0 Ci/µmol). In vitro autoradiography confirmed the specific binding of [18F]NT431 to CDK4/6 in brain tissues. Dynamic PET imaging supports that both [18F]NT431 and the parent abemaciclib crossed the BBB albeit with modest brain uptake. Therefore, we conclude that it is unlikely that NT431 or abemaciclib (FDA approved drug) can accumulate in the brain in sufficient concentrations to be potentially effective against breast cancer brain metastases or brain cancers. However, despite the modest BBB penetration, [18F]NT431 represents an important step towards the development and evaluation of a new generation of CDK4/6 inhibitors with superior BBB penetration for the treatment and visualization of CDK4/6 positive tumors in the CNS. Also, [18F]NT431 may have potential application in peripheral tumors such as breast cancer and other CDK4/6 positive tumors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号