Carcinoma, Lobular

癌,小叶
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    浸润性小叶癌表现出独特的形态特征,通常与CDH1的改变有关。尽管一些研究已经发现了E-cadherin以外的粘附因子异常,CDH1未改变的浸润性小叶癌中E-cadherin异常的分子机制仍知之甚少.在这项研究中,我们研究了在没有CDH1基因改变的浸润性小叶癌中E-cadherin失调的分子基础,使用全面的生物信息学分析。我们对CDH1突变和非突变的浸润性小叶癌进行了比较研究,并评估了mRNA水平的差异。反相蛋白质阵列,甲基化,和miRNA。我们观察到没有CDH1改变的浸润性小叶癌病例表现出明显更高的Claudin低亚型发生率(p<0.01)。反相蛋白阵列的结果表明在CDH1突变的和非突变的病例之间E-钙黏着蛋白表达没有显著差异。因此,CDH1非突变浸润性小叶癌也存在E-cadherin产生的异常.考虑到mRNA水平和甲基化状态没有差异,翻译后修饰是最合理的解释。因此,未来的研究应集中于阐明CDH1非突变浸润性小叶癌中E-cadherin通过翻译后修饰失活的潜在机制.
    Invasive lobular carcinoma exhibits unique morphological features frequently associated with alterations in CDH1. Although some studies have identified abnormalities in adhesion factors other than E-cadherin, the molecular mechanisms underlying E-cadherin abnormalities in CDH1-unaltered invasive lobular carcinoma remain poorly understood. In this study, we investigated the molecular underpinnings of E-cadherin dysregulation in invasive lobular carcinoma in the absence of CDH1 gene alterations, using comprehensive bioinformatic analyses. We conducted a comparative study of CDH1-mutated and non-mutated invasive lobular carcinoma and evaluated the differences in mRNA levels, reverse-phase protein array, methylation, and miRNAs. We observed that invasive lobular carcinoma cases without CDH1 alterations exhibited a significantly higher incidence of the Claudin-low subtype (p < 0.01). The results of the reverse-phase protein array indicate no significant difference in E-cadherin expression between CDH1-mutated and non-mutated cases. Therefore, abnormalities in E-cadherin production also exist in CDH1 non-mutated invasive lobular carcinoma. Considering that there are no differences in mRNA levels and methylation status, post-translational modifications are the most plausible explanation for the same. Hence, future studies should focus on elucidating the mechanism underlying E-cadherin inactivation via post-translational modifications in CDH1 non-mutated invasive lobular carcinoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    浸润性小叶乳腺癌(ILC)是“临床病理特征”可能与“长期预后”相冲突的潜在子集,在这种不一致的情况下,最佳管理策略尚不清楚。本研究旨在预测长期,ILC的总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)。从监测中检索非转移性ILC患者的临床信息,流行病学,2004年至2020年的最终结果(SEER)数据库。共纳入31451例患者,分为训练队列(n=22,017)和验证队列(n=9434)。最后一次随访是12月,2020年31日,中位随访期为99个月(1-203个月)。年龄,婚姻,雌激素(ER)状态,孕酮(PR)状态,grade,肿瘤大小,淋巴结比率(LNR)和综合总结(CS)分期是ILCOS和CSS的预后因素,而化疗和放疗是OS的独立保护因素。列线图表现出令人满意的辨别能力。对于培训和验证队列,OS列线图的C指数为0.765(95%CI0.762-0.768)和0.757(95%CI0.747-0.767),CSS列线图的C指数分别为0.812(95%CI0.804-0.820)和0.813(95%CI0.799-0.827),分别。此外,决策曲线分析(DCA)表明,列线图的预测性能优于传统的美国癌症联合委员会(AJCC)TNM分期。基于LNR预测长期预后的新颖列线图是预测生存的可靠工具。这可能有助于临床医生识别高危患者并为ILC患者设计个体化治疗方法。我们的研究结果应该有助于公共卫生预防策略,以减轻癌症负担。我们提供两个R/Shiny应用程序(https://ilc-survival2024。shinyapps.io/osnomogram/;https://ilc-survival2024。shinyapps.io/csnomogram/)可视化发现。
    Invasive lobular breast carcinoma (ILC) is one potential subset that \"clinicopathologic features\" can conflict with \"long-term outcome\" and the optimal management strategy is unknown in such discordant situations. The present study aims to predict the long-term, overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) of ILC. The clinical information of patients with non-metastatic ILC was retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database between 2004 and 2020. A total of 31451 patients were enrolled and divided into the training cohort (n=22,017) and validation cohort (n=9434). The last follow-up was December, 31, 2020 and the median follow-up period was 99 months (1-203). Age, marriage, estrogen (ER) status, progesterone (PR) status, grade, tumor size, lymph node ratio (LNR) and combined summary (CS) stage were prognostic factors for both OS and CSS of ILC, whereas chemotherapy and radiation were independent protect factors for OS. The nomograms exhibited satisfactory discriminative ability. For the training and validation cohorts, the C-index of the OS nomogram was 0.765 (95% CI 0.762-0.768) and 0.757 (95% CI 0.747-0.767), and the C-index of the CSS nomogram were 0.812 (95% CI 0.804-0.820) and 0.813 (95% CI 0.799-0.827), respectively. Additionally, decision curve analysis (DCA) demonstrated that the nomograms had superior predictive performance than traditional American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) TNM stage. The novel nomograms to predict long-term prognosis based on LNR are reliable tools to predict survival, which may assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and devising individual treatments for patients with ILC. Our findings should aid public health prevention strategies to reduce cancer burden. We provide two R/Shiny apps ( https://ilc-survival2024.shinyapps.io/osnomogram/ ; https://ilc-survival2024.shinyapps.io/cssnomogram/ ) to visualize findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    浸润性小叶乳腺癌(ILC)的特征是晚期复发的风险相对较高,并且具有独特的转移模式,转移到妇科器官和腹膜的风险增加。我们介绍了一例复发的ILC,并转移到腹部腹膜以及子宫肌层和子宫颈。伴随子宫癌肉瘤的发现使治疗复杂化。该患者的转移性ILC的激素治疗组合以及子宫癌肉瘤的化学疗法和免疫疗法的组合得到了有效治疗。分子评估显示ILC内的特征性CDH1突变和子宫癌肉瘤内的PI3KCA突变,两者都与上皮-间质转化有关。对肿瘤免疫微环境的检查显示出比例更高的细胞毒性NK细胞。这种强烈的免疫浸润可能是在该肿瘤中观察到的对免疫疗法的反应或子宫内转移性乳腺癌的结果的指标。本报告提供了转移性ILC和子宫癌肉瘤的分子和免疫学特征。
    Invasive lobular breast cancer (ILC) is characterized by a relatively high risk for late recurrence and a unique metastatic pattern with an increased risk for metastasis to gynecologic organs and peritoneum. We present a unique case of recurrent ILC with metastasis to the abdominal peritoneum as well as the uterine myometrium and cervix. Treatment was complicated by the discovery of concomitant uterine carcinosarcoma. This patient was effectively treated with a combination of hormonal therapy for her metastatic ILC and a combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy for uterine carcinosarcoma. Molecular evaluation revealed a characteristic CDH1 mutation within the ILC and a PI3KCA mutation within the uterine carcinosarcoma, both of which have been linked to epithelial-to-mesenchymal transitions. Examination of the tumor immune microenvironment revealed proportionally more cytotoxic NK cells. This robust immune infiltration may be an indicator of the response to immunotherapy observed in this tumor or a result of the metastatic breast cancer within the uterus. This report provides a characterization of the molecular and immunologic landscape in this case with metastatic ILC and uterine carcinosarcoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    浸润性导管和小叶混合癌(MDLC)是一种罕见的乳腺癌组织学亚型,在同一肿瘤内表现出E-cadherin阳性导管和E-cadherin阴性小叶形态。对预期的临床管理构成挑战。尚不清楚这些不同的形态是否也具有不同的生物学特性和复发风险。我们的空间分辨转录组,基因组,和单细胞谱分析揭示了导管和小叶肿瘤区域之间的临床显着差异,包括不同的内在亚型异质性-例如,三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)或基底导管和雌激素受体阳性(ER+)腔小叶区域的MDLC,细胞周期停滞/衰老和致癌(ER和MYC)特征的不同富集,小叶而非导管区域的遗传和表观遗传CDH1失活,以及具有独特致癌特征的单细胞导管和小叶亚群进一步突出了区域内异质性。总之,我们证明MDLC的瘤内形态/组织学异质性是由固有亚型和致癌异质性所支撑的,这可能导致预后不确定性和治疗困境.
    Mixed invasive ductal and lobular carcinoma (MDLC) is a rare histologic subtype of breast cancer displaying both E-cadherin positive ductal and E-cadherin negative lobular morphologies within the same tumor, posing challenges with regard to anticipated clinical management. It remains unclear whether these distinct morphologies also have distinct biology and risk of recurrence. Our spatially resolved transcriptomic, genomic, and single-cell profiling revealed clinically significant differences between ductal and lobular tumor regions including distinct intrinsic subtype heterogeneity - e.g., MDLC with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) or basal ductal and estrogen receptor positive (ER+) luminal lobular regions, distinct enrichment of cell cycle arrest/senescence and oncogenic (ER and MYC) signatures, genetic and epigenetic CDH1 inactivation in lobular but not ductal regions, and single-cell ductal and lobular subpopulations with unique oncogenic signatures further highlighting intraregional heterogeneity. Altogether, we demonstrated that the intratumoral morphological/histological heterogeneity within MDLC is underpinned by intrinsic subtype and oncogenic heterogeneity which may result in prognostic uncertainty and therapeutic dilemma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:对小叶炎性乳腺癌(IBC)的外科护理质量研究不足,这是不太常见的,对化疗的抵抗力更强,比导管IBC更隐匿性。我们比较了小叶和导管IBC的指南一致手术(改良根治术[MRM],化疗后不立即重建)。
    方法:2010-2019年在国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中确定了患有cT4dM0小叶和导管IBC的女性个体。通过“改良根治术”或“乳房切除术”和“≥10个淋巴结切除”(代表腋窝淋巴结清扫)的代码确定了改良根治术收据。描述性统计,卡方检验,并使用t检验。
    结果:共确定了1456例小叶和10,445例导管IBC患者;599例(41.1%)的小叶和4859例(46.5%)的导管IBC患者接受了MRM(p=0.001)。小叶性IBC患者包括较高比例的cN0疾病患者(小叶性与13.7%的导管)和手术时无淋巴结检查(31.2%与24.5%),但手术时淋巴结阴性的可能性较小(12.7%与17.1%,所有p<0.001)。在手术切除淋巴结的人中,与导管IBC患者相比,小叶IBC患者切除的淋巴结也较少(中位数[四分位距],7(0-15)vs.9(0-17)p=0.001)。
    结论:小叶性IBC患者在手术时更容易出现淋巴结阴性疾病,而不太可能出现淋巴结阴性。尽管数量较少,更常见的是没有,淋巴结检查与导管IBC患者。未来的研究应该调查这些治疗差异是否是因为手术方法,病理评估,和/或NCDB中捕获的数据质量。
    BACKGROUND: Quality of surgical care is understudied for lobular inflammatory breast cancer (IBC), which is less common, more chemotherapy-resistant, and more mammographically occult than ductal IBC. We compared guideline-concordant surgery (modified radical mastectomy [MRM] without immediate reconstruction following chemotherapy) for lobular versus ductal IBC.
    METHODS:  Female individuals with cT4dM0 lobular and ductal IBC were identified in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) from 2010-2019. Modified radical mastectomy receipt was identified via codes for \"modified radical mastectomy\" or \"mastectomy\" and \"≥10 lymph nodes removed\" (proxy for axillary lymph node dissection). Descriptive statistics, chi-square tests, and t-tests were used.
    RESULTS: A total of 1456 lobular and 10,445 ductal IBC patients were identified; 599 (41.1%) with lobular and 4859 (46.5%) with ductal IBC underwent MRMs (p = 0.001). Patients with lobular IBC included a higher proportion of individuals with cN0 disease (20.5% lobular vs. 13.7% ductal) and no lymph nodes examined at surgery (31.2% vs. 24.5%) but were less likely to be node-negative at surgery (12.7% vs. 17.1%, all p < 0.001). Among those who had lymph nodes removed at surgery, patients with lobular IBC also had fewer lymph nodes excised versus patients with ductal IBC (median [interquartile range], 7 (0-15) vs. 9 (0-17), p = 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Lobular IBC patients were more likely to present with node-negative disease and less likely to be node-negative at surgery, despite having fewer, and more frequently no, lymph nodes examined versus ductal IBC patients. Future studies should investigate whether these treatment disparities are because of surgical approach, pathologic assessment, and/or data quality as captured in the NCDB.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    从恶性肿瘤转移到胰腺是一个罕见的事件,仅占所有胰腺肿瘤的1%至2%。它们发生在两种不同的临床病理环境中:作为广泛转移性疾病的表现或作为胰腺中的孤立肿块。我们报道了一名41岁的女性,她有浸润性小叶乳腺癌的病史,接受了根治性手术治疗,化疗,和放射治疗。经过21年的完全缓解,她表现为严重的下背部疼痛伴黄疸,恶心,3个月内损失9公斤。腹部计算机断层扫描显示血管过度化,胰头不规则实性病变2.6厘米×2.1厘米,胆管扩张明显,肠系膜淋巴结肿大2厘米。乳腺小叶癌胰腺转移的诊断是通过胰腺病变的经皮活检来进行的。多学科委员会决定姑息治疗。患者接受化疗。从他的案例中得到的信息是,我们应该记住胰腺孤立转移的假设,当胰腺病变在有既往肿瘤临床病史的患者中发展时,尤其是在已知可能转移到胰腺的患者中。
    Metastasis to the pancreas from malignant tumors is a rare event, representing only 1% to 2% of all pancreatic neoplasms. They occur in 2 different clinicopathological settings: as a manifestation in widespread metastatic disease or as an isolated mass in the pancreas. We report the case of a 41-year-old woman who had a history of invasive lobular breast cancer treated with radical surgery, chemotherapy, and radiotherapy. After 21 years of total remission, she presented for severe lower back pain with jaundice, nausea, and loss of 9 kg in 3 months. Abdominal computed tomography demonstrated a hyper vascularized, irregular solid lesion of 2.6 cm × 2.1 cm in the head of the pancreas with discreet biliary duct dilatation and coelio-mesenteric enlarged lymph nodes measuring 2 cm. The diagnosis of pancreatic metastasis from a lobular breast carcinoma was made by percutaneous biopsy of pancreatic lesion. The multidisciplinary committee decided a palliative treatment. The patient received chemotherapy. The take home message from his case is that we should keep in mind the hypothesis of a solitary metastasis to the pancreas, when the pancreatic lesion develops in a patient who had a clinical history of previous neoplasm especially in those which is known to potentially metastasize to pancreas.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:浸润性小叶癌(ILC)占浸润性乳腺癌的5-15%。典型的ILC是雌激素受体(ER)阳性和人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性。非典型生物标志物谱(ER-和HER2+,ER+和HER2+或三阴性)似乎与典型的ILC不同。本研究在临床和病理参数方面比较了ILC的亚型,以及根据生物标志物谱对新辅助化疗(NACT)的反应。
    方法:从2005年1月至2020年12月在单一中心治疗的所有ILC患者均从前瞻性维护的数据库中确定。根据肿瘤生物标志物谱收集并分析临床病理和结果数据。
    结果:共治疗582例ILC患者。典型ILC为89.2%(n=519),非典型为10.8%(n=63)。非典型ILC的等级较高(3级为35%,3级为9.6%,p<0.001)。较大比例的非典型ILC接受NACT(31.7%vs6.9%p<0.001)。非典型ILC对NACT的反应更大(平均RCB(残留癌症负担评分)2.46与平均RCB3.41,p=0.0365),和更高的病理完全缓解率(15%vs0%p=0.017)。尽管如此,典型ILC患者的5年无病生存率(DFS)较高(91%vs83%,p=0.001)。
    结论:非典型ILC具有明显的特征。他们更频繁地处于较高年级,并且对NACT表现出优异的反应。尽管有后者,非典型ILC的5年DFS较差,这在预后方面应予以考虑,可能有助于患者选择NACT.
    BACKGROUND: Invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) accounts for 5-15% of invasive breast cancers. Typical ILC is oestrogen receptor (ER) positive and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) negative. Atypical biomarker profiles (ER- and HER2+, ER+ and HER2+ or triple negative) appear to differ from typical ILCs. This study compared subtypes of ILC in terms of clinical and pathological parameters, and response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) according to biomarker profile.
    METHODS: All patients with ILC treated in a single centre from January 2005 to December 2020 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Clinicopathologic and outcome data was collected and analysed according to tumour biomarker profile.
    RESULTS: A total of 582 patients with ILC were treated. Typical ILC was observed in 89.2% (n = 519) and atypical in 10.8% (n = 63). Atypical ILCs were of a higher grade (35% grade 3 vs 9.6% grade 3, p < 0.001). A larger proportion of atypical ILC received NACT (31.7% vs 6.9% p < 0.001). Atypical ILCs showed a greater response to NACT (mean RCB (Residual Cancer Burden Score) 2.46 vs mean RCB 3.41, p = 0.0365), and higher pathological complete response rates (15% vs 0% p = 0.017). Despite this, overall 5-year disease-free survival (DFS) was higher in patients with typical ILC (91% vs 83%, p = 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Atypical ILCs have distinct characteristics. They are more frequently of a higher grade and demonstrate a superior response to NACT. Despite the latter, atypical ILCs have a worse 5-year DFS which should be taken into consideration in terms of prognostication and may assist patient selection for NACT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    CDH1(E-cadherin基因)甲基化作为浸润性小叶癌(ILC)中基因失活机制的拟议作用仍不确定。多年来,CDH1启动子高甲基化已被视为ILC中基因失活的机制。然而,这种假设主要依赖于非定量检测,据报道,岛区域内CpG位点的CDH1甲基化频率为26%至93%。很少有研究采用定量方法并覆盖CpG岛岸,位于传统启动子CpG附近的CpG密度相对较低的区域,已经进行了,揭示较低的甲基化百分比范围从0到51%。因此,使用定量焦磷酸测序法,我们检查了缺乏E-cadherin的ILC病例(15例CDH1突变和22例非突变)的岛区域和海岸的CDH1甲基化,19例非特殊型浸润性乳腺癌(IBC-NSTs),和5例普通导管增生(UDH)。我们的分析显示CDH1甲基化频率范围为3%至64%,与IBC-NST(中位数=15%)相比,任何ILC组(中位数=12%)的甲基化水平都没有显着增加。此外,考虑到乳腺癌中肿瘤浸润淋巴细胞(TIL)数量与CDH1甲基化之间的相关性研究不足,我们在我们的数据集中进行了彻底的分析。我们的发现显示CDH1甲基化与TILs的存在呈正相关(r=0.5;p值<0.05),阐明乳腺癌生物学的一个方面需要进一步研究。这些发现挑战CDH1甲基化作为ILC中的CDH1失活机制,并强调TIL作为基因甲基化中的潜在混杂因子。
    The proposed role of CDH1 (E-cadherin gene) methylation as a mechanism of gene inactivation in invasive lobular carcinoma (ILC) remains inconclusive. For many years, CDH1 promoter hypermethylation has been regarded as a mechanism for gene inactivation in ILC. However, this assumption has primarily relied on non-quantitative assays, which have reported CDH1 methylation frequencies ranging from 26 to 93% at CpG sites within the island region. Few studies employing quantitative methods and covering CpG island shores, regions of relatively low CpG density situated proximal to conventional promoter CpGs, have been conducted, revealing lower percentages of methylation ranging from 0 to 51%. Therefore, using the quantitative pyrosequencing method, we examined CDH1 methylation in the island region and shores in E-cadherin deficient ILC cases (15 with CDH1 mutation and 22 non-mutated), 19 cases of invasive breast carcinomas non-special type (IBC-NSTs), and five cases of usual ductal hyperplasia (UDH). Our analysis revealed CDH1 methylation frequencies ranging from 3 to 64%, with no significant increase in methylation levels in any group of ILCs (median = 12%) compared to IBC-NST (median = 15%). In addition, considering the poorly studied association between the number of tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) and CDH1 methylation in breast cancer, we undertook a thorough analysis within our dataset. Our findings revealed a positive correlation between CDH1 methylation and the presence of TILs (r = 0.5; p-value < 0.05), shedding light on an aspect of breast cancer biology warranting further investigation. These findings challenge CDH1 methylation as a CDH1 inactivation mechanism in ILC and highlight TILs as a potential confounding factor in gene methylation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    具有非特殊类型的混合浸润性乳腺癌(IBC-NST)和浸润性小叶癌(ILC)组织学的原发性肿瘤在所有乳腺癌患者中约有5%存在,并且在转移水平上研究不足。这里,我们对死后组织捐献计划UPTIDER(NCT04531696)的两名原发性混合IBC-NST/ILC患者的转移瘤组织学进行了表征.尸检时收集的14和43个转移性病变的形态学特征和E-cadherin染色模式与纯ILC一致。虽然我们的发现还需要进一步验证,它们可能会挑战这些患者当前的临床实践和影像学检查方法.
    Primary tumors with a mixed invasive breast carcinoma of no-special type (IBC-NST) and invasive lobular cancer (ILC) histology are present in approximately five percent of all patients with breast cancer and are understudied at the metastatic level. Here, we characterized the histology of metastases from two patients with primary mixed IBC-NST/ILC from the postmortem tissue donation program UPTIDER (NCT04531696). The 14 and 43 metastatic lesions collected at autopsy had morphological features and E-cadherin staining patterns consistent with pure ILC. While our findings still require further validation, they may challenge current clinical practice and imaging modalities used in these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在所谓的遗传性弥漫性胃癌(HDGC)综合征中,致病性或可能致病性(P/LP)种系CDH1变异与弥漫性胃癌和小叶乳腺癌(LBC)的风险相关。然而,在某些情况下,在没有弥漫性胃癌表现的情况下,LBC可以是该综合征的第一表现。
    为了评估具有遗传性LBC(HLBC)表型的女性中种系CDH1变异的频率,种系CDH1变异携带者肿瘤样本中的体细胞CDH1基因失活,以及基因图谱与临床病理数据和生存率的关联。
    这个单中心,纵向,前瞻性队列研究于1997年1月1日至2021年12月31日进行,随访至2023年1月31日。包括在欧洲肿瘤研究所看到的LBC妇女。进行种系CDH1、BRCA1和BRCA2基因的测试。评估种系CDH1携带者的体细胞谱。
    准确估计HLBC患者种系CDH1变异的患病率以及体细胞序列改变与HLBC综合征的关联.Kaplan-Meier方法和多变量Cox比例风险回归模型用于总体和无病生存分析。
    5429例原发性LBC,家族性LBC表型占1867例(34.4%)。共有394名女性LBC接受了检测,其中鉴定出15个无关家族中的15个种系CDH1变异体。在这些变体中,6(40.0%)为P/LP,总频率为1.5%(394人中的6人)。在P/LPCDH1LBC的6名先证者中,5例(83.3%)有阳性的BC家族史,只有1例(16.7%)有散发性少年早发性LBC。在CDH1携带者中没有鉴定到种系BRCA1和BRCA2变体。在P/LP种系携带者中的6个探索的匹配肿瘤样品中的4个(66.7%)中鉴定了失活CDH1机制(第二次命中)。与携带未知意义或可能良性的CDH1变异的组相比,P/LPCDH1变异的LBC携带者在诊断时的年龄显着降低(42.5[IQR,38.3-43.0]vs51.0[IQR,45.0-53.0]年;P=0.03)。
    在这项队列研究中,P/LP种系CDH1变异体在不符合HDGC筛选的经典临床标准的个体中被鉴定,提示对这些变异的鉴定可能为检测诊断年龄较早和/或有BC家族史的LBC女性提供新的方法.
    UNASSIGNED: Pathogenic or likely pathogenic (P/LP) germline CDH1 variants are associated with risk for diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer (LBC) in the so-called hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) syndrome. However, in some circumstances, LBC can be the first manifestation of this syndrome in the absence of diffuse gastric cancer manifestation.
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the frequency of germline CDH1 variants in women with the hereditary LBC (HLBC) phenotype, somatic CDH1 gene inactivation in germline CDH1 variant carriers\' tumor samples, and the association of genetic profiles with clinical-pathological data and survival.
    UNASSIGNED: This single-center, longitudinal, prospective cohort study was conducted from January 1, 1997, to December 31, 2021, with follow-up until January 31, 2023. Women with LBC seen at the European Institute of Oncology were included. Testing for germline CDH1, BRCA1, and BRCA2 genes was performed. Somatic profiling was assessed for germline CDH1 carriers.
    UNASSIGNED: Accurate estimates of prevalence of germline CDH1 variants among patients with HLBC and the association of somatic sequence alteration with HLBC syndrome. The Kaplan-Meier method and a multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression model were applied for overall and disease-free survival analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 5429 cases of primary LBC, familial LBC phenotype accounted for 1867 (34.4%). A total of 394 women with LBC were tested, among whom 15 germline CDH1 variants in 15 unrelated families were identified. Among these variants, 6 (40.0%) were P/LP, with an overall frequency of 1.5% (6 of 394). Of the 6 probands with P/LP CDH1 LBC, 5 (83.3%) had a positive family history of BC and only 1 (16.7%) had sporadic juvenile early-onset LBC. No germline BRCA1 and BRCA2 variants were identified in CDH1 carriers. An inactivating CDH1 mechanism (second hit) was identified in 4 of 6 explored matched tumor samples (66.7%) in P/LP germline carriers. The P/LP CDH1 LBC variant carriers had a significantly lower age at diagnosis compared with the group carrying CDH1 variants of unknown significance or likely benign (42.5 [IQR, 38.3-43.0] vs 51.0 [IQR, 45.0-53.0] years; P = .03).
    UNASSIGNED: In this cohort study, P/LP germline CDH1 variants were identified in individuals not fulfilling the classic clinical criteria for HDGC screening, suggesting that identification of these variants may provide a novel method to test women with LBC with early age at diagnosis and/or positive family history of BC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号