有限元分析(FEA)在骨科研究中的重要性与日俱增,特别是在植入物设计中。然而,杨氏模量(E)值,最基本的参数之一,可以跨越广泛的规模。因此,我们的研究旨在确定影响人体骨标本中E值的因素。我们根据系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)2020年指南的推荐报告项目报告了我们的系统评价和荟萃分析。我们于2021年11月21日进行了分析。我们纳入了调查健康人骨标本的研究,并报告了有关人口统计数据的E值,试样特性,和测量细节。此外,我们纳入了报告单个样本测量结果的研究类型.从获得的数据中,我们创建了一个队列,其中我们进行了探索性数据分析,其中包括通过随机森林和回归树方法选择的解释变量,组间比较采用独立样本Welcht检验。共包括48篇文章中的756个条目。这些文章中包括了人体的11种不同的骨骼。E值的范围在0.008和33.7GPa之间。E值受所测试的皮质或松质骨类型的影响最大。测量方法(压缩,紧张,弯曲,和纳米压痕),骨骼内的解剖区域,骨骼在骨骼中的位置,骨标本大小对E值的影响减小。骨各向异性,试样条件,患者年龄,考虑到E的值,性别被选择为重要变量。根据我们的结果,骨的E值随骨骼特征而变化,测量技术,和人口统计学变量。因此,FEA的评估应在体外测量方案标准化后进行.©2023作者。JBMRPlus由WileyPeriodicalsLLC代表美国骨骼和矿物研究学会出版。
The importance of finite element analysis (FEA) is growing in orthopedic research, especially in implant design. However, Young\'s modulus (E) values, one of the most fundamental parameters, can range across a wide scale. Therefore, our study aimed to identify factors influencing E values in human bone specimens. We report our systematic review and meta-analysis based on the recommendation of the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) 2020 guideline. We conducted the analysis on November 21, 2021. We included studies investigating healthy human bone specimens and reported on E values regarding demographic data, specimen characteristics, and measurement specifics. In addition, we included study types reporting individual specimen measurements. From the acquired data, we created a cohort in which we performed an exploratory data analysis that included the explanatory variables selected by random forest and regression trees methods, and the comparison of groups using independent samples Welch\'s t test. A total of 756 entries were included from 48 articles. Eleven different bones of the human body were included in these articles. The range of E values is between 0.008 and 33.7 GPa. The E values were most heavily influenced by the cortical or cancellous type of bone tested. Measuring method (compression, tension, bending, and nanoindentation), the anatomical region within a bone, the position of the bone within the skeleton, and the bone specimen size had a decreasing impact on the E values. Bone anisotropy, specimen condition, patient age, and sex were selected as important variables considering the value of E. On the basis of our results, E values of a bone change with bone characteristics, measurement techniques, and demographic variables. Therefore, the evaluation of FEA should be performed after the standardization of in vitro measurement protocol. © 2023 The Authors. JBMR Plus published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.