Androstanols

雄甾烷醇
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    一个10岁的孩子,绝育的男性,金毛犬被推荐用于手术矫正后代囊肿。肌内注射乙酰丙嗪(0.02mg/kg)和美沙酮(0.5mg/kg)用于镇静,丙泊酚(2mg/kg)和咪达唑仑(0.2mg/kg)静脉内用于麻醉诱导,异氟烷在氧气中用于麻醉维持。罗库溴铵(0.5mg/kg),神经肌肉阻断剂,静脉内给药,以促进手术时眼睛的中央定位。罗库溴铵给药10分钟内,狗变得心动过速和低血压。最初的干预措施并未解决血流动力学异常,但静脉注射苯海拉明(0.8mg/kg)可成功缓解血流动力学异常。狗在整个剩余过程中保持稳定,并经历了平稳和平稳的恢复。虽然很难确认在该临床病例中观察到的血液动力学变化仅由罗库溴铵的给药引起,对心血管变化的观察,事件发生时间和对治疗的反应提示罗库溴铵引起的组胺反应,苯海拉明治疗成功.
    A 10-year-old, neutered male, Golden Retriever dog presented for surgical correction of a descemetocele. Acepromazine (0.02 mg/kg) and methadone (0.5 mg/kg) were administered intramuscularly for sedation, propofol (2 mg/kg) and midazolam (0.2 mg/kg) were administered intravenously for anaesthetic induction and isoflurane in oxygen was utilised for anaesthetic maintenance. Rocuronium (0.5 mg/kg), a neuromuscular blocking agent, was administered intravenously to facilitate central positioning of the eye for surgery. Within 10 min of rocuronium administration, the dog became tachycardic and hypotensive. Hemodynamic aberrations did not resolve with initial interventions but were successfully mitigated with the administration of diphenhydramine (0.8 mg/kg) intravenously. The dog remained stable throughout the remainder of the procedure and experienced a smooth and uneventful recovery. While it is difficult to confirm that the hemodynamic changes observed in this clinical case resulted solely from administration of rocuronium, the observance of the cardiovascular changes, timing of events and response to therapy suggest that rocuronium elicited a histamine response that was successfully treated with diphenhydramine.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:很少有研究通过直接测量浓度来比较高剂量和低剂量罗库溴铵在剖宫产中的作用。因此,我们进行了一项研究,以检查两种剂量的罗库溴铵对母亲和胎儿的血液浓度和临床影响。方法:18例患者随机分为两组:C组(0.6mg/kg),H集团,(1.0mg/kg)。主要结果是比较两组之间的脐静脉罗库溴铵浓度。我们评估了插管的难易程度,从罗库溴铵给药到一些TOF点的时间,麻醉后护理单元(PACU)停留时间,注入瑞芬太尼剂量,母体罗库溴铵浓度,和阿普加得分。结果:在人口统计学数据中没有观察到差异,易于插管,PACU停留时间,1分钟阿普加得分,两组之间的脐静脉血气分析。然而,H组罗库溴铵给药到T3消失的时间短于C组(p=0.009),T1和T2重现时间长于C组(p=0.003,p=0.009).H组的瑞芬太尼给药剂量(p=0.042)低于C组。在脐带夹闭前(p=0.002)和出院时(p<0.001)的脐静脉(p=0.004)和母体静脉中的罗库溴铵浓度在H组中也高于C组。结论:我们观察到PACU停留时间没有延长,H组Apgar评分与C组相比无差异。提示1.0mg/kg罗库溴铵在剖宫产术中对胎儿和母亲无不良影响。
    Background: There have been few studies comparing the effects of high- and low-dose rocuronium during cesarean section by directly measuring the concentration. Therefore, we conducted a study to examine the blood concentrations and clinical effects of both doses of rocuronium on mothers and fetuses. Methods: Eighteen patients were randomly assigned to two groups: C Group (0.6 mg/kg), and H Group, (1.0 mg/kg). The primary outcome was the comparison of umbilical vein rocuronium concentration between two groups. We assessed ease of intubation, time from rocuronium administration to some TOF points, post-anesthesia care unit (PACU) stay time, infused remifentanil dose, maternal rocuronium concentration, and Apgar scores. Results: No differences were observed in demographic data, ease of intubation, PACU stay time, 1 min Apgar scores, umbilical venous blood gas analysis between both groups. However, the time from rocuronium administration to T3 disappearance was shorter (p=0.009) and time to T1 and T2 reappearance were longer (p=0.003, p=0.009) in H group than that in C group. The administered remifentanil dose (p=0.042) was lower in the H group than in the C group. Rocuronium concentrations in the umbilical vein (p=0.004) and maternal vein before cord clamping (p=0.002) and at discharge (p<0.001) were also found to be higher in the H group than in the C group. Conclusions: We observed no prolongation of PACU stay, and no differences in Apgar scores in H group compared to C group. It suggests that 1.0 mg/kg of rocuronium has no negative effects on the fetus and mother in cesarean section.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在我们的研究中,我们的目的是比较标准的快速顺序插管方案和应用罗库溴铵引发技术对手术时间和血流动力学的影响。
    方法:应用于急诊科并需要快速顺序插管的患者被纳入我们的研究,我们进行了随机对照设计。研究中的随机化是根据病例的到达顺序进行的。标准组进行快速顺序插管。在启动组中,在诱导剂之前约3分钟施用10%的罗库溴铵剂量。插管时间,使用的药物数量,生命体征,记录用于确认插管的插管前后的呼气末CO2水平。
    结果:本研究共纳入52例患者,其中26例患者被纳入标准组,26例患者被纳入启动组。标准组插管时间为121.2±21.9s,启动组计算为68.4±11.6s(p<0.001)。标准组插管后平均动脉压为58.3±26.6mmHg,启动组为80.6±21.1mmHg(p=0.002)。
    结论:观察到罗库溴铵的灌注缩短了插管时间,并更好地保持了血流动力学曲线。
    背景:NCT05343702。
    OBJECTIVE: In our study, we aimed to compare the effect of standard rapid sequence intubation protocol and the application of rocuronium priming technique on the procedure time and hemodynamic profile.
    METHODS: Patients who applied to the emergency department and needed rapid sequence intubation were included in our study, which we conducted with a randomized controlled design. Randomization in the study was made according to the order of arrival of the cases. Rapid sequence intubation was performed in the standard group. In the priming group, 10% of the rocuronium dose was administered approximately 3 min before the induction agent. Intubation time, amount of drug used, vital signs, and end-tidal CO2 level before and after intubation used to confirm intubation were recorded.
    RESULTS: A total of 52 patients were included in the study, of which 26 patients were included in the standard group and 26 patients in the priming group. While intubation time was 121.2±21.9 s in the standard group, it was calculated as 68.4±11.6 s in the priming group (p<0.001). While the mean arterial pressure was 58.3±26.6 mmHg in the standard group after intubation, it was 80.6±21.1 mmHg in the priming group (p=0.002).
    CONCLUSIONS: It was observed that priming with rocuronium shortened the intubation time and preserved the hemodynamic profile better.
    BACKGROUND: NCT05343702.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    关于全身麻醉下罗库溴铵浸润的报道很少。我们报告了一例在麻醉诱导过程中可疑的意外罗库溴铵浸润。一位25岁的自闭症患者,智力残疾,并计划在全身麻醉下摘除4颗受累的第三磨牙。七氟醚诱导后,在左头静脉建立了静脉(IV)线。服用了罗库溴铵;然而,立即观察到静脉部位的皮下肿胀。保持自发通气,直到通过新的IV线施用额外的罗库溴铵。热包应用后,浸润60分钟后肿胀消失,未观察到组织损伤。制定了一项策略,继续进行神经肌肉监测,直到恢复为止。使用了加速度描记术,渗透后99、130和140分钟的4列比率分别为0.79、0.91和1.0。施用Sugammadex以防止神经肌肉阻滞复发。一旦观察到足够的肌肉功能和意识恢复,就将患者拔管。术后未观察到神经肌肉阻滞延长或复发。当怀疑罗库溴铵渗入时,重要的是消除浸润部位的肿胀,并确定基于神经肌肉监测的管理策略。
    There are few reports on rocuronium infiltration under general anesthesia. We report a case of suspected accidental rocuronium infiltration during anesthesia induction. A 25-year-old woman with autism spectrum disorder, intellectual disability, and epilepsy was scheduled for the extraction of 4 impacted third molars under general anesthesia. After induction with sevoflurane, an intravenous (IV) line was established in the left cephalic vein. Rocuronium was administered; however, subcutaneous swelling at the IV site was observed immediately. Spontaneous ventilations were maintained until additional rocuronium was administered via a new IV line. After heat pack application, the swelling disappeared 60 minutes after infiltration, and no tissue damage was observed. A strategy was developed to continue neuromuscular monitoring until recovery occurred. Acceleromyography was used, and the train-of-4 ratios at 99, 130, and 140 minutes after infiltration were 0.79, 0.91, and 1.0, respectively. Sugammadex was administered to prevent neuromuscular blockade recurrence. The patient was extubated once adequate return of muscle function and consciousness were observed. No neuromuscular block prolongation or recurrence were observed postoperatively. When rocuronium infiltration is suspected, it is important to eliminate swelling at the infiltration site and determine a management strategy based on neuromuscular monitoring.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    背景:Sugammadex逆转了罗库溴铵和维库溴铵诱导的神经肌肉阻滞,并被美国食品和药物管理局批准用于2岁以上的患者。有,然而,关于婴儿和2岁以下儿童的给药概况的数据很少。
    目的:本研究的目的是评估复发的风险,或者再次瘫痪,在2岁以下儿童中,提高对适当神经肌肉阻滞监测和逆转的重要性的认识。
    方法:所有年龄≤24个月的患者,在2018年1月1日至2021年12月31日期间在三级医疗中心接受手术治疗,并接受罗库溴铵用于神经肌肉阻滞和Sugammadex用于神经肌肉阻滞逆转,在电子病历中被确认.如果患者(1)接受维库溴铵,则将其排除在分析之外,顺式阿曲库铵,阿曲库铵,或琥珀酰胆碱用于神经肌肉阻滞,(2)接受新斯的明逆转,或(3)在24小时内进行了多次手术。我们使用Cox比例风险模型对sugammadex再剂量进行了生存分析。
    结果:我们回顾了2923条记录。Sugammadex在123例(4.2%)中重新使用。重新给药的中位数[IQR]时间为7[4-17]分钟,再次给药的中位数[IQR]量为2.74[1.96-3.99]mg/kg。患者年龄(p<0.01)和体重(p<0.01)的增加与sugammadex再给药的危险率降低相关。对于中等体重的患者,年龄从3个月增加到13个月与53%的风险降低相关(HR:0.47;95%CI:0.24~0.91).对于一个中位年龄的病人,体重从4.7kg增加至9.2kg与41%的风险降低相关(HR:0.59;95%CI:0.32~1.07).我们没有发现任何其他关联。
    结论:在这个单中心中,儿科手术患者的回顾性队列研究,sugammadex再给药的危险与年龄和体重的增加有关联.
    Sugammadex reverses the neuromuscular blockade induced by rocuronium and vecuronium and is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for use in patients aged over 2 years. There is, however, a paucity of data regarding its dosing profile in infants and children younger than 2 years.
    The aim of this study was to assess the risk of recurarization, or re-paralysis, in children under 2 years of age to increase awareness on the importance of appropriate neuromuscular blocked monitoring and reversal.
    All patients aged ≤24 months who underwent an operative procedure at a tertiary medical center between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021, and received both rocuronium for neuromuscular blockade and sugammadex for neuromuscular blockade reversal, were identified in the electronic medical record. Patients were excluded from analysis if they (1) received vecuronium, cisatracurium, atracurium, or succinylcholine for neuromuscular blockade, (2) received neostigmine for reversal, or (3) underwent more than one operation within 24 h. We performed a survival analysis of sugammadex redose using a Cox proportional hazards model.
    We reviewed 2923 records. Sugammadex was redosed in 123 (4.2%) cases. The median [IQR] time to redose was 7 [4-17] min, and the median [IQR] amount of redose administered was 2.74 [1.96-3.99] mg/kg. Increasing patient age (p < .01) and weight (p < .01) were associated with reduced hazard rate of sugammadex redose. For a patient of median weight, increasing age from 3 to 13 months was associated with a 53% risk reduction (HR: 0.47; 95% CI: 0.24-0.91). For a patient of median age, increasing weight from 4.7 to 9.2 kg was associated with 41% risk reduction (HR: 0.59; 95% CI: 0.32-1.07). We failed to detect any other associations.
    In this single-center, retrospective cohort study of pediatric surgery patients, there was an association between the hazard of sugammadex redose with both increased age and weight.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    颅神经损伤是颈淋巴结清扫术的一种罕见但重要的并发症。我们检查了术中神经肌肉阻滞的使用与颈清扫术中医源性颅神经损伤之间的关系。
    这是一个单一的中心,回顾性,电子健康记录审查。研究纳入标准规定患者>18岁,在全身麻醉下解剖颈部淋巴水平≥2个恶性肿瘤,手术日期在2008年至2018年之间。在颈清扫术中使用神经肌肉阻滞是主要的自变量。这被定义为任何使用罗库溴铵,顺式阿曲库铵,麻醉诱导后或维库溴铵,在手术切口前没有用sugammadex逆转。单变量测试用于比较那些患者之间的变量,和那些没有,医源性脑神经损伤.多变量逻辑回归确定了颅神经损伤的预测因子,并结合Firth的估计进行,因为主要结局的患病率较低。
    我们的队列包括对897例患者进行的925种不同的颈淋巴结清扫术。在285(30.8%)颈淋巴结清扫术中使用了神经肌肉阻滞。确定了14例(占手术病例的1.5%)神经损伤。在单变量逻辑回归中,使用神经肌肉阻滞与医源性颅神经损伤无关(OR:1.73,95%CI:0.62-4.86,p=0.30).在多变量逻辑回归控制患者年龄方面没有显著关联,性别,体重,ASA类,麻痹剂量,糖尿病史,中风,冠状动脉疾病,颈动脉粥样硬化,心肌梗塞,和心律失常(OR:1.87,95%CI:0.63-5.51,p=0.26)。
    在这项研究中,颈淋巴清扫术中使用神经肌肉阻滞与医源性颅神经损伤的发生率无关.虽然这项调查提供了早期支持的安全使用神经肌肉阻滞在颈部解剖,未来有更大权力的调查仍然是必要的。
    Cranial nerve injury is an uncommon but significant complication of neck dissection. We examined the association between the use of intraoperative neuromuscular blockade and iatrogenic cranial nerve injury during neck dissection.
    This was a single-center, retrospective, electronic health record review. Study inclusion criteria stipulated patients > 18 years who had ≥ 2 neck lymphatic levels dissected for malignancy under general anesthesia with a surgery date between 2008 - 2018. Use of neuromuscular blockade during neck dissection was the primary independent variable. This was defined as any use of rocuronium, cisatracurium, or vecuronium upon anesthesia induction without reversal with sugammadex prior to surgical incision. Univariate tests were used to compare variables between those patients with, and those without, iatrogenic cranial nerve injury. Multivariable logistic regression determined predictors of cranial nerve injury and was performed incorporating Firth\'s estimation given low prevalence of the primary outcome.
    Our cohort consisted of 925 distinct neck dissections performed in 897 patients. Neuromuscular blockade was used during 285 (30.8%) neck dissections. Fourteen instances (1.5% of surgical cases) of nerve injury were identified. On univariate logistic regression, use of neuromuscular blockade was not associated with iatrogenic cranial nerve injury (OR: 1.73, 95% CI: 0.62 - 4.86, p = 0.30). There remained no significant association on multivariable logistic regression controlling for patient age, sex, weight, ASA class, paralytic dose, history of diabetes, stroke, coronary artery disease, carotid atherosclerosis, myocardial infarction, and cardiac arrythmia (OR: 1.87, 95% CI: 0.63 - 5.51, p = 0.26).
    In this study, use of neuromuscular blockade intraoperatively during neck dissection was not associated with increased rates of iatrogenic cranial nerve injury. While this investigation provides early support for safe use of neuromuscular blockade during neck dissection, future investigation with greater power remains necessary.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景技术胰肾联合移植(SPK)是一项耗时且重要的外科手术,这可以提供达到正常血糖的生理手段,并使患者无需透析。sugammadex的潜在临床益处包括快速和可预测的反向神经肌肉阻滞(NMB),但是sugammadex是否影响SPK移植物的功能尚不确定。材料与方法研究了48例患者,并用sugamadex(n=24)或新斯的明(n=24)逆转了深NMB。安全性变量包括血清肌酐(Scr),肌酐清除率(CCr),血清淀粉酶(AMS),血糖(Glu),平均动脉压(MAP),心率(HR)次要结果是从预定时间给予sugamadex/新斯的明到TOF比率恢复到0.7和0.9的时间,以及急性肺部并发症。结果T2-6时Scr明显低于T0-1时(P<0.01),CCr较高(P<0.05)。在两组之间,Scr,CCr,与AMS在相同时间点相似(P>0.05)。MAP,HR,T1时S组Glu高于N组(P<0.05)。S组TOF=0.7的恢复时间为3(2.4-4.2)min,N组为12.1(10.2-15.9)min(P<0.001),S组至TOFr≥0.9的恢复时间为4.8(3.6-7.1)min,S组为23.5(19.8-30.8)。与N组相比,S组急性肺部并发症的风险较低:补充氧需求0vs4(16.7%),肺不张0比2(0.83%),肺炎1(4.2%)对3(12.5%),低氧血症1(4.2%)vs4(16.7%)。结论Sugammadex给药对SPK移植受体是安全有效的。
    BACKGROUND Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) is a time-consuming and important surgical procedure, which can provide a physiological mean of achieving normoglycemia and render patients free of dialysis. The potential clinical benefits of sugammadex include fast and predictable reverse deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB), but whether sugammadex affects the function of SPK grafts is uncertain. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-eight patients were studied and reversed deep NMB with either sugammadex (n=24) or neostigmine (n=24). The safety variables included serum creatinine (Scr), creatinine clearance rate (CCr), serum amylase (AMS), blood glucose (Glu), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR). Secondary outcomes were time from administration of sugammadex/neostigmine at the scheduled time to recovery of a TOF ratio to 0.7 and 0.9, and post-acute pulmonary complications. RESULTS Scr at T2-6 was significantly lower than that at T0-1 (P<0.01), while CCr was higher (P<0.05). Between the 2 groups, Scr, CCr, and AMS were similar at the same timepoints (P>0.05). MAP, HR, and Glu were higher in group S than in group N at T1 (P<0.05). The recovery time of TOF=0.7 was 3 (2.4-4.2) min for group S and 12.1 (10.2-15.9) min for group N (P<0.001), and recovery time to TOFr ≥0.9 was 4.8 (3.6-7.1) min for group S and 23.5 (19.8-30.8) in group S. Compared to group N, group S had lower risk for post-acute pulmonary complications: supplemental oxygen requirements 0 vs 4 (16.7%), pulmonary atelectasis 0 vs 2 (0.83%), pneumonia 1 (4.2%) vs 3 (12.5%), and hypoxemia 1 (4.2%) vs 4 (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS Sugammadex administration is safe and effective for SPK transplantation recipients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    背景:定量监测神经肌肉阻断剂给药后神经肌肉阻滞水平的可靠装置至关重要。肌电图和加速肌电图是临床实践中常用的两种监测方式。这项研究的主要结果是比较神经肌肉阻滞的发作,定义为由基于肌电图的设备(TetraGraph)和基于加速肌电图的设备(TOFscan)测量的等于0的四组计数(TOFC)。次要结果是当这两个装置中的一个达到等于0的TOFC时比较插管条件。
    方法:招募了100名需要神经肌肉阻滞的择期手术的成年患者。麻醉诱导前,根据随机化将TetraGraph电极放置在患者的优势/非优势手的前臂上,并将TOFscan电极放置在对侧前臂上。术中神经肌肉阻断剂剂量标准化为0.5mg。kg-1的罗库溴铵。获得基线值后,每20秒记录一次客观测量值,一旦任一装置显示TOFC=0,则使用视频喉镜进行插管.然后对麻醉提供者进行了有关插管条件的调查。
    结果:基线TetraGraph四序列比率高于使用TOFscan获得的比率(中位数:1.02[0.88,1.20]与1.00[0.64,1.01],分别,p<0.001)。与TOFscan相比,使用TetraGraph测量时达到TOFC=0的时间明显更长(中位数:160[40,900]与120[60,300]秒,分别,p<0.001)。当使用任一设备确定气管内插管的时机时,插管条件没有显着差异。
    结论:用TetraGraph测量时,神经肌肉阻滞的发作时间长于TOFscan,在任何一种设备中,四个计数为零是适当插管条件的有用指标。
    背景:URLNCT05120999,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05120999。
    Reliable devices that quantitatively monitor the level of neuromuscular blockade after neuromuscular blocking agents\' administration are crucial. Electromyography and acceleromyography are two monitoring modalities commonly used in clinical practice. The primary outcome of this study is to compare the onset of neuromuscular blockade, defined as a Train-Of-Four Count (TOFC) equal to 0, as measured by an electromyography-based device (TetraGraph) and an acceleromyography-based device (TOFscan). The secondary outcome was to compare intubating conditions when one of these two devices reached a TOFC equal to 0.
    One hundred adult patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring neuromuscular blockade were enrolled. Prior to induction of anesthesia, TetraGraph electrodes were placed over the forearm of patients\' dominant/non-dominant hand based on randomization and TOFscan electrodes placed on the contralateral forearm. Intraoperative neuromuscular blocking agent dose was standardized to 0.5 mg.kg-1 of rocuronium. After baseline values were obtained, objective measurements were recorded every 20 seconds and intubation was performed using video laryngoscopy once either device displayed a TOFC = 0. The anesthesia provider was then surveyed about intubating conditions.
    Baseline TetraGraph train-of-four ratios were higher than those obtained with TOFscan (Median: 1.02 [0.88, 1.20] vs. 1.00 [0.64, 1.01], respectively, p < 0.001). The time to reach a TOFC = 0 was significantly longer when measured with TetraGraph compared to TOFscan (Median: 160 [40, 900] vs. 120 [60, 300] seconds, respectively, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in intubating conditions when either device was used to determine the timing of endotracheal intubation.
    The onset of neuromuscular blockade was longer when measured with TetraGraph than TOFscan, and a train-of-four count of zero in either device was a useful indicator for adequate intubating conditions.
    URL NCT05120999, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05120999.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:NMB有利于全身麻醉的插管条件。然而,它与显著的残余术后瘫痪和发病率相关。
    目的:根据两个TOFR标准(<0.91和<1.00)调查未诊断的残留NMB的发生率。
    方法:我们按照STROBE指南进行了一项回顾性研究。我们纳入了2018年6月至12月使用单剂量神经肌肉阻滞进行平衡全身麻醉的ENT手术患者。我们收集了人口统计和人体测量数据,ASA得分,NMBA剂量,在5、30和60分钟以及手术结束时记录TOFR,麻醉和手术时间,和逆转剂的管理。统计分析包括描述性和分散性测量统计,不同TOFR标准下残留NMB的曲线和交叉表,并对AR进行子分析,RR,和OR在65岁以上的患者中。
    结果:我们包括57例患者,平均年龄41岁;43名女性和14名男性。平均麻醉和手术时间分别为139.4和116.1分钟,分别。所有患者均接受罗库溴铵的平均单剂量为0.48mg/kg。对于TOFR<0.91和<1.00,残余NMB率分别为29.9%和49.1%。老年人的残余NMB的OR为6.08。
    结论:残留NMB率为29.9-49.1%,取决于使用的标准(TOFR分别<0.91和<1.00)。65岁以上患者的残余NMB(6.08OR)和与残余NMB相关的临床症状(11.75OR)的风险增加。我们建议未来的研究旨在为65岁以上的患者提供特定的监测方案,包括较短动作的NMB,早期逆转,和使用<1.00的TOFR标准进行长期监测,以确定有残留NMB风险的患者。
    NMB facilitates intubating conditions in general anesthesia. However, it is associated with significant residual postoperative paralysis and morbidity.
    To investigate the rate of underdiagnosed residual NMB based on two TOFR criteria (< 0.91 and < 1.00).
    We performed a retrospective study adhering to STROBE guidelines. We included patients undergoing ENT surgery using single-dose neuromuscular block for balanced general anesthesia from June to December 2018. We collected demographic and anthropometric data, ASA score, NMBA dose, TOFR recordings at 5, 30 and 60 min and end of the surgery, anesthesia and surgery time, and administration of reversal agent. Statistical analysis included descriptive and dispersion measures statistics, curve and cross tables for residual NMB on different TOFR criteria with sub-analysis for AR, RR, and OR in patients over 65 years old.
    We included 57 patients, mean age 41; 43 females and 14 males. Mean anesthetic and surgical time were 139.4 and 116.1 min, respectively. All the patients received rocuronium under a mean ponderal single-dose of 0.48 mg/kg. Residual NMB rates were 29.9 and 49.1% for a TOFR < 0.91 and < 1.00, respectively. Older adults had an OR of 6.08 for residual NMB.
    The rate of residual NMB was 29.9 to 49.1%, depending on the criteria used (TOFR < 0.91 and < 1.00, respectively). Patients above 65 years old had an increased risk of residual NMB (6.08 OR) and clinical symptoms related to residual NMB (11.75 OR). We recommend future research aiming to provide a specific surveillance protocol for patients above 65 years old, including shorter-action NMB, early reversal, and prolonged surveillance using the TOFR criteria of < 1.00 to identify patients at risk of residual NMB readily.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号