Androstanols

雄甾烷醇
  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    高体脂百分比患者的药效学可能与肥胖患者相似。这项随机对照临床试验观察了罗库溴铵对不同体脂百分比(PBFs)患者的影响。本研究纳入了在上海市总医院进行全身麻醉下择期泌尿外科或盆腔手术的54例患者;纳入了51例患者进行数据分析。PBF正常(<25%)的患者根据总体重(N-TBW,对照组)。PBF较高(≥25%)的患者根据总体重(H-TBW)计算单剂量的罗库溴铵。PBF和罗库溴铵较高的患者根据无脂质量(H-FFM)给药。一组四个(TOF)-观察加速度描记器用于测量罗库溴铵的作用。H-TBW(91.9±28.8s)的起效时间明显短于N-TBW和H-FFM(p=0.003)。H-TBW的临床持续时间和药理持续时间明显长于其他组(p=0.000和0.000);三组的TOF比值0.25-0.9时间差异有统计学意义(p=0.005)。三组间恢复时间(p=0.103)和恢复指数(p=0.159)差异无统计学意义。基于FFM的罗库溴铵对高PBF患者的影响与正常患者相似。基于TBW计算的单剂量罗库溴铵可能会缩短起效时间,延长临床和药理持续时间,并延长恢复时间。
    The pharmacodynamics in patients with high body fat percentage might be similar to those in obese patients. This randomised controlled clinical trial observed the effects of rocuronium in patients with different percent body fats (PBFs). Fifty-four patients who underwent elective urological or pelvic surgery under general anaesthesia at Shanghai General Hospital were included in the present study; 51 patients were included for data analysis. Patients with normal PBF (<25%) were given a single dose of rocuronium calculated based on total body weight (N-TBW, control group). Patients with a higher PBF (≥25%) were given a single dose of rocuronium calculated based on total body weight (H-TBW). Patients with higher PBF and rocuronium were dosed based on fat-free mass (H-FFM). A train of four (TOF)-Watch acceleromyography monitor was used to measure the effects of the rocuronium. H-TBW (91.9 ± 28.8 s) had significantly shorter onset time than N-TBW and H-FFM (p = 0.003). H-TBW had significantly longer clinical duration time and pharmacological duration time than the other groups (p = 0.000 and 0.000, respectively); the TOF ratio0.25-0.9 time was significantly different among the three groups (p = 0.005). There were no significant differences in the recovery time (p = 0.103) or recovery index (p = 0.159) among the three groups. The effects of rocuronium dosed based on FFM in patients with high PBFs are similar to those in normal patients. A single dose of rocuronium calculated based on TBW might shorten the onset time, prolong the clinical and pharmacological duration times, and prolong the recovery time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial, Phase III
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景:adamgammadex的初步临床试验,一种新型的基于环糊精的选择性逆转剂,已证明其在逆转罗库溴铵神经肌肉阻滞中的功效。
    方法:这个多中心,随机化,双盲,阳性对照,非劣效性III期临床试验比较了adamgammadex和sugammadex的疗效和安全性。我们随机分配了310名受试者,以在四人组(TOF)的第二次抽搐出现时接受adamgammadex(4mgkg-1)或sugammadex(2mgkg-1),并收集标准安全性数据.
    结果:对于主要结果,在adamgammadex组中,5分钟内TOF比率≥0.9的患者比例为98.7%,在sugammadex组中为100%,点估计和95%置信区间(CI)为1.3%(-4.6%,+1.3%);下限大于-10%的非劣效性边缘。对于关键的次要结果,从开始服用adamgammadex或sugammadex到TOF比率恢复到0.9的中位数(四分位数间)时间为2.25(1.75,2.75)min和1.75(1.50,2.00)min,分别。差异为0.50(95%CI:0.25,0.50);上限低于5分钟的非劣效性边缘。此外,在次要结局中未观察到较差的结果.与sugammadex相比,Adamgammadex的药物不良反应发生率较低(过敏反应,递归,心率下降,和喉痉挛;P=0.047)。
    结论:Adamgammadex不劣于sugammadex,与sugammadex相比,药物不良反应的发生率可能更低。Adamgammadex在其整体风险收益方面可能具有潜在优势。
    背景:中国临床试验注册中心,ChiCTR2000039525。2020年10月30日注册。https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=56825。
    BACKGROUND: Preliminary clinical trials of adamgammadex, a new cyclodextrin-based selective reversal agent, have demonstrated its efficacy in reversing neuromuscular block by rocuronium.
    METHODS: This multicentre, randomised, double-blind, positive-controlled, non-inferiority phase III clinical trial compared the efficacy and safety of adamgammadex and sugammadex. We randomised 310 subjects to receive adamgammadex (4 mg kg-1) or sugammadex (2 mg kg-1) at reappearance of the second twitch of the train-of-four (TOF), and standard safety data were collected.
    RESULTS: For the primary outcome, the proportion of patients with TOF ratio ≥0.9 within 5 min was 98.7% in the adamgammadex group vs 100% in the sugammadex group, with a point estimate and 95% confidence interval (CI) of 1.3% (-4.6%, +1.3%); the lower limit was greater than the non-inferiority margin of -10%. For the key secondary outcome, the median (inter quartile range) time from the start of administration of adamgammadex or sugammadex to recovery of TOF ratio to 0.9 was 2.25 (1.75, 2.75) min and 1.75 (1.50, 2.00) min, respectively. The difference was 0.50 (95% CI: 0.25, 0.50); the upper limit was lower than the non-inferiority margin of 5 min. In addition, there were no inferior results observed in secondary outcomes. Adamgammadex had a lower incidence of adverse drug reactions compared with sugammadex (anaphylactic reaction, recurarisation, decreased heart rate, and laryngospasm; P=0.047).
    CONCLUSIONS: Adamgammadex was non-inferior to sugammadex with a possible lower incidence of adverse drug reactions compared with sugammadex. Adamgammadex may have a potential advantage in terms of its overall risk-benefit profile.
    BACKGROUND: Chinese Clinical Trial Registry, ChiCTR2000039525. Registered October 30, 2020. https://www.chictr.org.cn/showproj.html?proj=56825.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    镁增强神经肌肉阻断剂的作用。然而,缺乏证据证明镁对新斯的明诱导的罗库溴铵神经肌肉阻滞恢复可能有影响.该研究比较了用镁处理的组(M组)和安慰剂对照(C组)之间从神经肌肉阻滞恢复的概况。64名患者被随机分配到M组或C组。M组的患者接受50mg/kg镁的负荷剂量和15mg/kg/hr的连续输注。C组患者接受相当量的生理盐水。0.6mg/kg的罗库溴铵用于气管插管,并额外施用0.1mg/kg的罗库溴铵,以在手术过程中保持4组(TOF)状态为2-3。手术结束时,给予新斯的明(50μg/kg)加格隆溴铵(10μg/kg),并测量了TOF比率为0.7、0.8和0.9的恢复时间。主要结果是从新斯的明给药到恢复的时间,TOF比率为0.9。此外,罗库溴铵起效时间(从服用罗库溴铵到第一次TOF抽搐反应抑制95%的时间),还测量了罗库溴铵的额外需求和自发恢复期(从罗库溴铵给药到首次TOF抽搐反应再次出现的时间).新斯的明诱导的恢复时间在M组和C组之间具有可比性(10.6±4.3vs.9.1±5.0min,分别,p=0.22)。M组罗库溴铵起效时间较短,M组的自发恢复期更长。M组的额外罗库溴铵给药量降低了27%,但这种差异并不显著。镁未显示延长新斯的明诱导的罗库溴铵神经肌肉阻滞恢复时间,然而,它增强了罗库溴铵的临床效果。
    Magnesium enhances the effects of neuromuscular blocking agents. However, there is a paucity of evidence demonstrating possible effects of magnesium on neostigmine-induced recovery from neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium. This study compared the profiles of recovery from neuromuscular blockade between groups treated with magnesium (Group M) and placebo controls (Group C). Sixty-four patients were randomly allocated to Group M or Group C. Patients in Group M received a loading dose of 50 mg/kg magnesium and continuous infusion of 15 mg/kg/hr. Patients in Group C received a comparable amount of saline. Rocuronium at 0.6 mg/kg was used for tracheal intubation and 0.1 mg/kg of rocuronium was additionally administered to maintain train-of-four (TOF) status of 2-3 during surgery. At the end of surgery, neostigmine (50 μg/kg) plus glycopyrrolate (10 μg/kg) were administered, and the recovery time for TOF ratios of 0.7, 0.8, and 0.9 was measured. The primary outcome was the time from neostigmine administration to recovery with a TOF ratio of 0.9. In addition, rocuronium onset time (time from administration of rocuronium to 95% suppression of the first TOF twitch response), additional requirements for rocuronium and spontaneous recovery period (the time from administration of rocuronium to reappearance of the first TOF twitch response) were also measured. Neostigmine-induced recovery time was comparable between Group M and Group C (10.6 ± 4.3 vs. 9.1 ± 5.0 min, respectively, p = 0.22). The rocuronium onset time was shorter in Group M, and the spontaneous recovery period was longer in Group M. The amount of additional rocuronium administered was 27% lower in Group M, but this difference was not significant. Magnesium was not shown to prolong neostigmine-induced recovery time from neuromuscular blockade with rocuronium, however, it enhanced the clinical effects of rocuronium.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:当前的研究验证了用sugammadex逆转后硫酸镁引起复发的假设。
    方法:单中心,prospective,随机化,双盲,对照试验。
    方法:里约热内卢特级护理医院,巴西。
    方法:包括60例接受择期耳鼻喉手术的患者。
    方法:所有患者均接受全静脉麻醉和单剂量罗库溴铵(0.6mg/kg)。在30名患者中,神经肌肉阻滞在1或2次强直性后计数(深度阻滞系列)再次出现时被sugamadex(4mg/kg)逆转.在其他30名患者中,sugammadex(2mg/kg)在四组(中度阻断系列)的第二次抽搐重新出现时施用。在标准化的四组比率恢复到≥0.9后,每个系列的患者被随机分配接受静脉注射硫酸镁(60mg/kg)或安慰剂10分钟。神经肌肉功能通过加速肌电图测量。
    方法:主要结果是表现出复发的患者数量(标准化4组比率<0.9)。次要结果是在60分钟后用额外剂量的sugammadex挽救。
    结果:在深度封锁系列中,在接受硫酸镁的9/14(64%)和接受安慰剂的1/14(7%)患者中,标准化的四组比率<0.9,RR9.0(95%CI:62-1.30),和(p=0.002),用sugammadex进行了四次救援。在温和封锁系列中,神经肌肉阻滞在接受硫酸镁治疗的11/15(73%)患者和接受安慰剂治疗的0/14(0%)患者中复发(p<0.001),两次救援。在深度封锁和中度封锁中,递归的绝对差异分别为57%和73%,分别。
    结论:单剂量硫酸镁在使用sugammadex从罗库溴铵诱导的深度和中度神经肌肉阻滞中恢复2分钟后,导致标准化的四组比率<0.9。额外的sugammadex逆转了长时间的递归。
    The current study tested the hypothesis that magnesium sulfate after reversal with sugammadex causes recurarization.
    A single-center, prospective, randomized, double-blind, controlled trial.
    Terciary care hospital in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil.
    Included 60 patients undergoing for elective otolaryngological surgery.
    All patients received total intravenous anesthesia and a single dose of rocuronium (0.6 mg/kg). In 30 patients, the neuromuscular blockade was reversed with sugammadex (4 mg/kg) at the reappearance of one or two posttetanic counts (deep-blockade series). In 30 other patients, sugammadex (2 mg/kg) was administered at the reappearance of the second twitch of the train-of-four (moderate-blockade series). After the normalized train-of-four ratio recovered to ≥0.9, the patients in each series were randomized to receive intravenous magnesium sulfate (60 mg/kg) or placebo for 10 min. Neuromuscular function was measured by acceleromyography.
    The primary outcome was the number of patients who exhibited recurarization (normalized train-of-four ratio < 0.9). The secondary outcome was rescue with an additional dose of sugammadex after 60 min.
    In the deep-blockade series, a normalized train-of-four ratio < 0.9 occurred in 9/14 (64%) patients receiving magnesium sulfate and 1/14 (7%) receiving placebo, RR 9.0 (95% CI: 62-1.30), and (p = 0.002), with four rescues with sugammadex. In the moderate-blockade series, neuromuscular blockade recurred in 11/15 (73%) patients receiving magnesium sulfate and in 0/14 (0%) receiving placebo (p < 0.001), with two rescues. The absolute differences in recurarization were 57% and 73% in the deep-blockade and moderate-blockade, respectively.
    Single-dose magnesium sulfate led to a normalized train-of-four ratio < 0.9, 2 min after recovery from rocuronium-induced deep and moderate neuromuscular blockade using sugammadex. Additional sugammadex reversed prolonged recurarization.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    背景技术胰肾联合移植(SPK)是一项耗时且重要的外科手术,这可以提供达到正常血糖的生理手段,并使患者无需透析。sugammadex的潜在临床益处包括快速和可预测的反向神经肌肉阻滞(NMB),但是sugammadex是否影响SPK移植物的功能尚不确定。材料与方法研究了48例患者,并用sugamadex(n=24)或新斯的明(n=24)逆转了深NMB。安全性变量包括血清肌酐(Scr),肌酐清除率(CCr),血清淀粉酶(AMS),血糖(Glu),平均动脉压(MAP),心率(HR)次要结果是从预定时间给予sugamadex/新斯的明到TOF比率恢复到0.7和0.9的时间,以及急性肺部并发症。结果T2-6时Scr明显低于T0-1时(P<0.01),CCr较高(P<0.05)。在两组之间,Scr,CCr,与AMS在相同时间点相似(P>0.05)。MAP,HR,T1时S组Glu高于N组(P<0.05)。S组TOF=0.7的恢复时间为3(2.4-4.2)min,N组为12.1(10.2-15.9)min(P<0.001),S组至TOFr≥0.9的恢复时间为4.8(3.6-7.1)min,S组为23.5(19.8-30.8)。与N组相比,S组急性肺部并发症的风险较低:补充氧需求0vs4(16.7%),肺不张0比2(0.83%),肺炎1(4.2%)对3(12.5%),低氧血症1(4.2%)vs4(16.7%)。结论Sugammadex给药对SPK移植受体是安全有效的。
    BACKGROUND Simultaneous pancreas-kidney transplantation (SPK) is a time-consuming and important surgical procedure, which can provide a physiological mean of achieving normoglycemia and render patients free of dialysis. The potential clinical benefits of sugammadex include fast and predictable reverse deep neuromuscular blockade (NMB), but whether sugammadex affects the function of SPK grafts is uncertain. MATERIAL AND METHODS Forty-eight patients were studied and reversed deep NMB with either sugammadex (n=24) or neostigmine (n=24). The safety variables included serum creatinine (Scr), creatinine clearance rate (CCr), serum amylase (AMS), blood glucose (Glu), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and heart rate (HR). Secondary outcomes were time from administration of sugammadex/neostigmine at the scheduled time to recovery of a TOF ratio to 0.7 and 0.9, and post-acute pulmonary complications. RESULTS Scr at T2-6 was significantly lower than that at T0-1 (P<0.01), while CCr was higher (P<0.05). Between the 2 groups, Scr, CCr, and AMS were similar at the same timepoints (P>0.05). MAP, HR, and Glu were higher in group S than in group N at T1 (P<0.05). The recovery time of TOF=0.7 was 3 (2.4-4.2) min for group S and 12.1 (10.2-15.9) min for group N (P<0.001), and recovery time to TOFr ≥0.9 was 4.8 (3.6-7.1) min for group S and 23.5 (19.8-30.8) in group S. Compared to group N, group S had lower risk for post-acute pulmonary complications: supplemental oxygen requirements 0 vs 4 (16.7%), pulmonary atelectasis 0 vs 2 (0.83%), pneumonia 1 (4.2%) vs 3 (12.5%), and hypoxemia 1 (4.2%) vs 4 (16.7%). CONCLUSIONS Sugammadex administration is safe and effective for SPK transplantation recipients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    背景:定量监测神经肌肉阻断剂给药后神经肌肉阻滞水平的可靠装置至关重要。肌电图和加速肌电图是临床实践中常用的两种监测方式。这项研究的主要结果是比较神经肌肉阻滞的发作,定义为由基于肌电图的设备(TetraGraph)和基于加速肌电图的设备(TOFscan)测量的等于0的四组计数(TOFC)。次要结果是当这两个装置中的一个达到等于0的TOFC时比较插管条件。
    方法:招募了100名需要神经肌肉阻滞的择期手术的成年患者。麻醉诱导前,根据随机化将TetraGraph电极放置在患者的优势/非优势手的前臂上,并将TOFscan电极放置在对侧前臂上。术中神经肌肉阻断剂剂量标准化为0.5mg。kg-1的罗库溴铵。获得基线值后,每20秒记录一次客观测量值,一旦任一装置显示TOFC=0,则使用视频喉镜进行插管.然后对麻醉提供者进行了有关插管条件的调查。
    结果:基线TetraGraph四序列比率高于使用TOFscan获得的比率(中位数:1.02[0.88,1.20]与1.00[0.64,1.01],分别,p<0.001)。与TOFscan相比,使用TetraGraph测量时达到TOFC=0的时间明显更长(中位数:160[40,900]与120[60,300]秒,分别,p<0.001)。当使用任一设备确定气管内插管的时机时,插管条件没有显着差异。
    结论:用TetraGraph测量时,神经肌肉阻滞的发作时间长于TOFscan,在任何一种设备中,四个计数为零是适当插管条件的有用指标。
    背景:URLNCT05120999,https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05120999。
    Reliable devices that quantitatively monitor the level of neuromuscular blockade after neuromuscular blocking agents\' administration are crucial. Electromyography and acceleromyography are two monitoring modalities commonly used in clinical practice. The primary outcome of this study is to compare the onset of neuromuscular blockade, defined as a Train-Of-Four Count (TOFC) equal to 0, as measured by an electromyography-based device (TetraGraph) and an acceleromyography-based device (TOFscan). The secondary outcome was to compare intubating conditions when one of these two devices reached a TOFC equal to 0.
    One hundred adult patients scheduled for elective surgery requiring neuromuscular blockade were enrolled. Prior to induction of anesthesia, TetraGraph electrodes were placed over the forearm of patients\' dominant/non-dominant hand based on randomization and TOFscan electrodes placed on the contralateral forearm. Intraoperative neuromuscular blocking agent dose was standardized to 0.5 mg.kg-1 of rocuronium. After baseline values were obtained, objective measurements were recorded every 20 seconds and intubation was performed using video laryngoscopy once either device displayed a TOFC = 0. The anesthesia provider was then surveyed about intubating conditions.
    Baseline TetraGraph train-of-four ratios were higher than those obtained with TOFscan (Median: 1.02 [0.88, 1.20] vs. 1.00 [0.64, 1.01], respectively, p < 0.001). The time to reach a TOFC = 0 was significantly longer when measured with TetraGraph compared to TOFscan (Median: 160 [40, 900] vs. 120 [60, 300] seconds, respectively, p < 0.001). There was no significant difference in intubating conditions when either device was used to determine the timing of endotracheal intubation.
    The onset of neuromuscular blockade was longer when measured with TetraGraph than TOFscan, and a train-of-four count of zero in either device was a useful indicator for adequate intubating conditions.
    URL NCT05120999, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05120999.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Clinical Trial
    背景:当四组计数为2或更大时,制造商推荐的用于逆转罗库溴铵的sugammadex的剂量为2mg/kg,当小于2但存在至少1的强直后计数时,为4mg/kg。这项剂量发现研究的目的是在心脏手术结束时滴定sugamadex以产生4个比率≥0.9,并继续监测ICU中的神经肌肉阻滞,以确定复发性瘫痪。假设是许多患者需要少于推荐剂量的sugammadex,但是有些人需要更多,这种反复发作的瘫痪不会发生.
    方法:在心脏手术期间使用肌电图监测神经肌肉阻滞。罗库溴铵的给药由麻醉护理小组自行决定。在胸骨闭合期间,每5分钟以50mg的增量滴定sugammadex,直到获得4个比率≥0.9。在ICU中使用肌电图监测神经肌肉阻滞,直到在拔管前停止镇静或最多7小时。
    结果:评估了97例患者。达到≥0.9的四组比例所需的sugammadex剂量在0.43至5.6mg/kg之间变化。神经肌肉阻滞的深度与逆转所需的Sugammadex剂量之间存在统计学上的显着关系,但是在任何深度的神经肌肉阻滞所需的剂量存在很大差异。97例患者中有84例(87%)需要低于推荐剂量,13(13%)需要更多。两名患者因复发性瘫痪而需要额外的sugammadex给药。
    结论:当sugammadex滴定至有效时,剂量通常低于推荐剂量,但在一些病人身上更多.因此,定量抽搐监测对于确定sugammadex管理后已经发生了足够的逆转至关重要。2例患者出现复发性瘫痪。
    The dose of sugammadex recommended by the manufacturer for reversal of rocuronium is 2 mg/kg when the train-of-four count is 2 or more and 4 mg/kg when it is less than 2 but there is a posttetanic count of at least 1. The purpose of this dose-finding study was to titrate sugammadex to produce a train-of-four ratio 0.9 or greater at the conclusion of cardiac surgery, and to continue monitoring neuromuscular blockade in the intensive care unit to identify recurrent paralysis. The hypothesis was that many patients would require less than the recommended dose of sugammadex, but that some would require more, and that recurrent paralysis would not occur.
    Neuromuscular blockade was monitored using electromyography during cardiac surgery. Administration of rocuronium was at the discretion of the anesthesia care team. During sternal closure, sugammadex was titrated in 50-mg increments every 5 min until a train-of-four ratio 0.9 or greater was obtained. Neuromuscular blockade was monitored with electromyography in the intensive care unit until sedation was discontinued before extubation or for a maximum of 7 h.
    Ninety-seven patients were evaluated. The dose of sugammadex required to achieve a train-of-four ratio of 0.9 or greater varied from 0.43 to 5.6 mg/kg. There was a statistically significant relationship between the depth of neuromuscular blockade and the sugammadex dose required for reversal, but there was a large variation in dose required at any depth of neuromuscular blockade. Eighty-four of 97 patients (87%) required less than the recommended dose, and 13 (13%) required more. Two patients required additional sugammadex administration for recurrent paralysis.
    When sugammadex was titrated to effect, the dose was usually less than the recommended dose, but it was more in some patients. Therefore, quantitative twitch monitoring is essential for ascertaining that adequate reversal has taken place after sugammadex administration. Recurrent paralysis was observed in two patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:NMB有利于全身麻醉的插管条件。然而,它与显著的残余术后瘫痪和发病率相关。
    目的:根据两个TOFR标准(<0.91和<1.00)调查未诊断的残留NMB的发生率。
    方法:我们按照STROBE指南进行了一项回顾性研究。我们纳入了2018年6月至12月使用单剂量神经肌肉阻滞进行平衡全身麻醉的ENT手术患者。我们收集了人口统计和人体测量数据,ASA得分,NMBA剂量,在5、30和60分钟以及手术结束时记录TOFR,麻醉和手术时间,和逆转剂的管理。统计分析包括描述性和分散性测量统计,不同TOFR标准下残留NMB的曲线和交叉表,并对AR进行子分析,RR,和OR在65岁以上的患者中。
    结果:我们包括57例患者,平均年龄41岁;43名女性和14名男性。平均麻醉和手术时间分别为139.4和116.1分钟,分别。所有患者均接受罗库溴铵的平均单剂量为0.48mg/kg。对于TOFR<0.91和<1.00,残余NMB率分别为29.9%和49.1%。老年人的残余NMB的OR为6.08。
    结论:残留NMB率为29.9-49.1%,取决于使用的标准(TOFR分别<0.91和<1.00)。65岁以上患者的残余NMB(6.08OR)和与残余NMB相关的临床症状(11.75OR)的风险增加。我们建议未来的研究旨在为65岁以上的患者提供特定的监测方案,包括较短动作的NMB,早期逆转,和使用<1.00的TOFR标准进行长期监测,以确定有残留NMB风险的患者。
    NMB facilitates intubating conditions in general anesthesia. However, it is associated with significant residual postoperative paralysis and morbidity.
    To investigate the rate of underdiagnosed residual NMB based on two TOFR criteria (< 0.91 and < 1.00).
    We performed a retrospective study adhering to STROBE guidelines. We included patients undergoing ENT surgery using single-dose neuromuscular block for balanced general anesthesia from June to December 2018. We collected demographic and anthropometric data, ASA score, NMBA dose, TOFR recordings at 5, 30 and 60 min and end of the surgery, anesthesia and surgery time, and administration of reversal agent. Statistical analysis included descriptive and dispersion measures statistics, curve and cross tables for residual NMB on different TOFR criteria with sub-analysis for AR, RR, and OR in patients over 65 years old.
    We included 57 patients, mean age 41; 43 females and 14 males. Mean anesthetic and surgical time were 139.4 and 116.1 min, respectively. All the patients received rocuronium under a mean ponderal single-dose of 0.48 mg/kg. Residual NMB rates were 29.9 and 49.1% for a TOFR < 0.91 and < 1.00, respectively. Older adults had an OR of 6.08 for residual NMB.
    The rate of residual NMB was 29.9 to 49.1%, depending on the criteria used (TOFR < 0.91 and < 1.00, respectively). Patients above 65 years old had an increased risk of residual NMB (6.08 OR) and clinical symptoms related to residual NMB (11.75 OR). We recommend future research aiming to provide a specific surveillance protocol for patients above 65 years old, including shorter-action NMB, early reversal, and prolonged surveillance using the TOFR criteria of < 1.00 to identify patients at risk of residual NMB readily.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Randomized Controlled Trial
    目的:比较两种标准麻醉方案用于喉镜手术的结果:神经肌肉阻滞剂全身麻醉(NMBA)与瑞芬太尼和丙泊酚(非NMBA)。
    方法:这是一个前瞻性的,单盲,三级护理中心的随机对照试验。患者被随机分为使用罗库溴铵(NMBA)或单独输注瑞芬太尼/丙泊酚(非NMBA)的麻醉。术中印象,麻醉数据,收集术后患者调查。
    结果:纳入了从2020年至2022年接受支撑喉镜检查的61例患者(25名女性,36男,20-81岁)。30名患者纳入NMBA组,31名患者纳入非NMBA组。NMBA组心率和平均动脉压较高(p<0.01)。非NMBA组患者更可能需要血管加压药(p=0.04,RR=3.08[0.86-11.05])。与非NMBA组(58.1%,p<0.01)。由于非NMBA组的移动(45.1%),与NMBA组(16.6%,p<0.03,RR=2.26[1.02-4.99])。与NMBA组相比,非NMBA组的患者在手术后一周更有可能认可肌痛(44%)(8.3%,p<0.01),并在0-10疼痛量表(3.7)上报告的平均疼痛水平高于瘫痪组(2.0)。
    结论:与瑞芬太尼/丙泊酚麻醉相比,罗库溴铵麻醉具有更好的术中条件和术后疼痛。瑞芬太尼/丙泊酚与降低血压和抑制喉镜相关的心动过速有关。
    方法:二级喉镜,2023年。
    To compare outcomes between two standard-of-care anesthesia regimens for operative laryngoscopy: general anesthesia with a neuromuscular blocking agent (NMBA) versus remifentanil and propofol (non-NMBA).
    This was a prospective, single-blinded, randomized controlled trial at a tertiary care center. Patients were randomized to either anesthesia using rocuronium (NMBA) or with remifentanil/propofol infusion alone (non-NMBA). Intraoperative impressions, anesthesia data, and post-operative patient surveys were collected.
    Sixty-one patients who underwent suspension laryngoscopy from 2020 to 2022 were included (25 female, 36 male, ranging 20-81 years). Thirty patients were enrolled in the NMBA arm and 31 patients in the non-NMBA arm. Heart rate and mean arterial pressure were higher in the NMBA (p < 0.01). Patients in the non-NMBA group were more likely to require vasopressors (p = 0.04, RR = 3.08 [0.86-11.05]). Surgeons were more frequently satisfied with conditions in the NMBA group (86.7%) compared to the non-NMBA group (58.1%, p < 0.01). Procedures were more likely to be paused due to movement in the non-NMBA group (45.1%) compared to the NMBA group (16.6%, p < 0.03, RR = 2.26 [1.02-4.99]). Patients in the non-NMBA group were more likely to endorse myalgia the week after surgery (44%) compared to the NMBA group (8.3%, p < 0.01) and reported higher average pain levels on a 0-10 pain scale (3.7) compared to the paralysis group (2.0).
    Anesthesia with rocuronium was associated with better intraoperative conditions and postoperative pain compared to anesthesia with remifentanil/propofol. Remifentanil/propofol were associated with lower blood pressure and suppression of laryngoscopy-associated tachycardia.
    2 Laryngoscope, 133:2654-2664, 2023.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号