American Indian Or Alaska Native

美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    与白人相比,美国的美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)在慢性呼吸道疾病方面存在差异。使用行为危险因素监测系统(BRFSS)数据,我们之前的研究表明,在BRFSS定义的11个州的一个子集中,AI/AN种族/民族变量与哮喘和/或慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)无关,历史上被认为AI/AN居民比例相对较高.这里,我们调查了AI/AN变量和其他社会人口统计学决定因素对美国其余39个州和地区疾病差异的贡献.使用2011年至2019年的BRFSS调查,我们证明了无论种族如何,39个州的哮喘和/或COPD的年校正患病率高于11个州.Logistic回归分析显示,在调整社会人口统计学协变量后,AI/AN种族/种族变量与39州地区的疾病呈正相关,与11州地区不同。这表明哮喘和/或COPD的疾病患病率和差异的分布在美国是不均匀的。尽管AI/AN人群在美国各地都经历过这种疾病差异,AI/AN变量仅在39个州的区域中被观察到导致这种差异.在制定消除差异政策时,考虑呼吸系统健康决定因素的地理分布和对AI/AN疾病差异有独特影响的因素可能很重要。
    American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) persons in the US experience a disparity in chronic respiratory diseases compared to white persons. Using Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS) data, we previously showed that the AI/AN race/ethnicity variable was not associated with asthma and/or chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) in a BRFSS-defined subset of 11 states historically recognized as having a relatively high proportion of AI/AN residents. Here, we investigate the contributions of the AI/AN variable and other sociodemographic determinants to disease disparity in the remaining 39 US states and territories. Using BRFSS surveys from 2011 to 2019, we demonstrate that irrespective of race, the yearly adjusted prevalence for asthma and/or COPD was higher in the 39-state region than in the 11-state region. Logistic regression analysis revealed that the AI/AN race/ethnicity variable was positively associated with disease in the 39-state region after adjusting for sociodemographic covariates, unlike in the 11-state region. This shows that the distribution of disease prevalence and disparity for asthma and/or COPD is non-uniform in the US. Although AI/AN populations experience this disease disparity throughout the US, the AI/AN variable was only observed to contribute to this disparity in the 39-state region. It may be important to consider the geographical distribution of respiratory health determinants and factors uniquely impactful for AI/AN disease disparity when formulating disparity elimination policies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    加强社会支持和联系可以降低自杀风险,然而,很少有研究在美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)成年人中检查这种影响。我们评估了自杀意念和行为,受挫的归属感,社会支持,养成文化,历史创伤,来自五个AI/AN社区的709名具有自杀风险的AI/AN成年人的创伤性生活事件。自杀意念与受挫的归属感有关,并受到社会支持和参与AI/AN仪式的保护。在那些终生自杀未遂的人中,创伤性生活事件,由于历史创伤引起的抑郁/焦虑症状,受挫的归属感与更多的尝试有关。更多地参与文化习俗与更少的自杀企图有关。更高水平的社会支持与更多的自杀企图有关,这可能归因于研究的横断面性质。干预措施应侧重于保护因素和针对特定环境的干预措施,强调社区历史,值,和优势。
    Enhancing social support and connectedness can reduce suicide risk, yet few studies have examined this effect in American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) adults. We assessed suicidal ideation and behavior, thwarted belongingness, social support, enculturation, historical trauma, and traumatic life events in 709 AI/AN adults at high risk of suicide from five AI/AN communities. Suicidal ideation was associated with thwarted belongingness and protected against by social support and engaging in AI/AN ceremonies. Among those who made lifetime suicide attempts, traumatic life events, symptoms of depression/anxiety due to historical trauma, and thwarted belongingness were linked to more attempts. More engagement in cultural practices was associated with fewer suicide attempts. Higher levels of social support were associated with more suicide attempts, an observation potentially attributable to the cross-sectional nature of the study. Interventions should focus on protective factors and context-specific interventions emphasizing community history, values, and strengths.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    了解涉及司法系统的人群之间的死亡率差异对于公共卫生和政策至关重要,特别是对于边缘化种族群体,如美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民。
    为了研究南达科他州涉及更广泛的司法系统的人口中死亡率的种族差异,注重不同的量刑倾向和作用场所。
    这项观察性研究使用了2000年1月至2016年12月与死亡率数据相关的行政犯罪记录。全州范围内的数据与南达科他州总检察长办公室和南达科他州卫生部的数据相关联。在这个基于人群的样本中分析了18岁及以上的被捕者。数据从2022年8月1日至2023年7月30日进行了分析。
    仅将判刑处置归类为逮捕,好,缓刑,监狱,还有监狱.
    主要结果是使用泊松回归模型计算的死亡率(包括全因和特定原因),根据人口和县级变量进行了调整。
    在182472个人中,有422987人被捕,研究样本包括29690名美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民被捕者(男性17900[60%];平均[SD]年龄,29.4[11.0]岁)和142248名白人被捕者(103471[73%]男性;平均[SD]年龄,32.6[12.9]年)。美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民占被捕者的16%,占被捕者的26%,但只有9%的人口在南达科他州。跨配置,白人被判缓刑的死亡风险更大,监狱,和监狱相对于只被捕的白人。在种族差异方面,在仅逮捕处置中,美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民的全因死亡风险是白人被捕者的2.37倍(95%CI,1.95-2.88).在所有处置中都存在差异,但在缓刑和监禁方面却大大缩小了差异。原因特异性死亡风险的结果相似,除了癌症风险。在城市地区,在仅有逮捕倾向的人群中,相对于白人个体,美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民的死亡风险高2.70倍(95%CI,1.29-2.44).
    在这项基于人群的观察研究中,涉及司法系统的个人之间的死亡风险和相关种族差异在性格和地点上有很大差异,强调需要针对这些因素进行公共卫生干预。需要进一步的研究来了解量刑和地点塑造这些差异的机制。
    UNASSIGNED: Understanding mortality disparities among justice system-involved populations is crucial for public health and policy, especially for marginalized racial groups such as American Indian/Alaska Native persons.
    UNASSIGNED: To examine racial disparities in mortality within the broader justice system-involved population in South Dakota, focusing on different sentencing dispositions and the role of place.
    UNASSIGNED: This observational study used administrative criminal records linked to mortality data from January 2000 to December 2016. The statewide data linked data from South Dakota Attorney General\'s Office and South Dakota Department of Health. Individuals aged 18 years and older with arrests were analyzed in this population-based sample. Data were analyzed from August 1, 2022, to July 30, 2023.
    UNASSIGNED: Sentencing dispositions were categorized as arrest only, fine, probation, jail, and prison.
    UNASSIGNED: The main outcomes were mortality rates (both all-cause and cause-specific) calculated using Poisson regression models, adjusted for demographic and county variables.
    UNASSIGNED: Of 182 472 individuals with 422 987 arrests, the study sample included 29 690 American Indian/Alaska Native arrestees (17 900 [60%] male; mean [SD] age, 29.4 [11.0] years) and 142 248 White arrestees (103 471 [73%] male; mean [SD] age, 32.6 [12.9] years). American Indian/Alaska Native persons accounted for 16% of arrestees and 26% of arrests, but only 9% of the population in South Dakota. Across dispositions, mortality risk was greater for White individuals sentenced to probation, jail, and prison relative to White individuals who were arrested only. In terms of racial disparities, all-cause mortality risk was 2.37 (95% CI, 1.95-2.88) times higher for American Indian/Alaska Native than White arrestees in the arrest-only disposition. Disparities persisted across all dispositions but narrowed substantially for probation and prison. Results were similar for cause-specific mortality risk, except for cancer risk. In urban areas, mortality risk was 2.70 (95% CI, 1.29-2.44) times greater for American Indian/Alaska Native individuals relative to White individuals among those with arrest-only dispositions.
    UNASSIGNED: In this population-based observational study, mortality risk and associated racial disparities among justice system-involved individuals differed substantially across dispositions and places, underscoring the need for public health interventions tailored to these factors. Further research is needed to understand the mechanisms through which sentencing and place shape these disparities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2021年,美国约有75,000人死于与暴力有关的伤害。本报告总结了CDC的国家暴力死亡报告系统(NVDRS)在48个州发生的暴力死亡数据,哥伦比亚特区,和2021年的波多黎各。结果按性别报告,年龄组,种族和民族,伤害方法,受伤发生的位置类型,受伤的情况,和其他选定的特征。本报告介绍了其他事件和环境变量,现在包括儿童受害者的具体情况信息。这份报告还纳入了美国人口普查局新的种族和种族类别,现在占多个种族和夏威夷原住民或其他太平洋岛民类别,并包括更新的分母来计算这些人口的比率。
    2021年。
    NVDRS从死亡证明中收集有关暴力死亡的数据,验尸官和法医记录,和执法报告。该报告包括2021年发生的暴力死亡数据。数据来自48个州(除佛罗里达州和夏威夷以外的所有州),哥伦比亚特区,波多黎各。46个州有全州数据,另外两个州的数据来自代表其人口子集的县(31个加州县,占其人口的64%,和德克萨斯州的13个县,占其人口的63%),哥伦比亚特区和波多黎各拥有全辖区的数据。NVDRS整理每个暴力死亡的信息,并链接相关的死亡(例如,多起凶杀案,然后是自杀,或多次自杀)成一个事件。
    到2021年,NVDRS收集了有关68,866起致命事件的信息,涉及48个州的70,688人死亡(46个州收集全州数据,加州31个县,和德克萨斯州的13个县),还有哥伦比亚特区.在NVDRS中捕获的死亡人数占所有凶杀案的86.5%,法律干预死亡,自杀,意外枪伤死亡,和2021年美国未定意图死亡。此外,收集了波多黎各816起致命事件的信息,涉及880人死亡.分别分析了波多黎各的数据。在70,688例死亡中,大多数(58.2%)是自杀,其次是凶杀案(31.5%),可能因暴力而导致的未定意图死亡(8.2%),法律干预死亡(1.3%)(即执法人员和其他有权使用致命武力执行职务的人造成的死亡,不包括法律处决),意外枪支伤害死亡(<1.0%)。“法律干预”一词是国际疾病分类中的一种分类,第十次修订,并不表示执法造成的死亡情况的合法性或合法性。人口模式和环境因死亡方式而异。男性的自杀率高于女性。在所有年龄组中,在≥85岁的成年人中自杀率最高.此外,非西班牙裔美国印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)的人在所有种族和族裔群体中自杀率最高。在男性和女性中,最常见的自杀伤害方法是枪支。在所有自杀受害者中,当情况已知时(84.4%),自杀之前最常见的是心理健康,亲密伴侣,或身体健康问题,或在过去或即将到来的2周内最近或即将发生的危机。男性的凶杀率高于女性。在所有凶杀受害者中,与其他年龄组相比,20-24岁人群的凶杀率最高。非西班牙裔黑人或非裔美国人(黑人)男性在任何种族或族裔群体中的凶杀率最高。在所有凶杀受害者中,最常见的伤害方法是枪支。当知道凶杀案受害者和嫌疑人之间的关系时,犯罪嫌疑人通常是男性受害者的熟人或朋友,以及女性受害者的现任或前任亲密伴侣。杀人通常是由争论或冲突引发的,与另一起犯罪发生的,或者,对于女性受害者来说,与亲密伴侣暴力有关。几乎所有法律干预死亡的受害者都是男性,30-34岁男性的法律干预死亡率最高。法律干预死亡率在AI/AN男性中最高,其次是黑人男性。在大多数法律干预死亡中使用了枪支。当情况已知时,据报道,法律干预死亡的最常见情况如下:受害者在事件中使用了武器,受害者有药物使用问题(酒精使用除外)。其他死亡原因包括无意枪支伤害死亡和未确定意图死亡。男性最常见的意外枪支伤害死亡,非西班牙裔白人,和15-24岁的人。这些死亡最常发生在射手玩枪支时,并被一个人无意中拉动扳机而引起。不确定意图的死亡率在男性中最高,特别是在AI/AN和黑人男性中,以及30-54岁的成年人。中毒是意图不明的死亡中最常见的伤害方法,在接受这些物质测试的近80%的死者中检测到阿片类药物。
    本报告提供了NVDRS关于2021年发生的暴力死亡的数据的详细摘要。自杀率在AI/AN和白人男性中最高,而黑人男性的凶杀率最高。亲密伴侣暴力引发了很大一部分女性杀人事件。心理健康问题,亲密伴侣的问题,人际冲突,和急性生活压力源是检查的多种类型死亡的主要诱因。
    暴力是可以预防的,数据可以指导公共卫生行动。NVDRS数据用于监测与暴力有关的致命伤害的发生,并协助公共卫生当局制定,实施,和评估项目,政策,以及减少和预防暴力死亡的做法。NVDRS数据可用于将预防工作增强为可操作的策略。各州或辖区已使用其暴力死亡报告系统(VDRS)数据来指导自杀预防工作,并强调需要进一步关注的地方。例如,北卡罗莱纳州VDRS计划数据在扩大与枪支安全和伤害预防有关的活动方面发挥了重要作用。该程序作为合作伙伴的主要数据源,这导致了该州预防暴力办公室的成立,专注于打击与枪支有关的死亡。在缅因州,VDRS提供了有关执法人员自杀的数据,这些数据用于帮助支持一项法案,该法案要求在该州的执法培训学院进行心理健康弹性和意识培训,以及针对心理健康的类似培训计划,物质使用,惩教人员中的酒精问题。此外,州和司法管辖区也使用其VDRS数据来检查与其州或司法管辖区的凶杀有关的因素。例如,佐治亚州VDRS与亚特兰大市长减少暴力办公室合作,开发了两个公共仪表板,不仅提供有关暴力死亡的全面数据,而且还提供有关受暴力影响严重的人口地理分布的数据,以帮助为预防暴力干预措施提供信息。
    In 2021, approximately 75,000 persons died of violence-related injuries in the United States. This report summarizes data from CDC\'s National Violent Death Reporting System (NVDRS) on violent deaths that occurred in 48 states, the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico in 2021. Results are reported by sex, age group, race and ethnicity, method of injury, type of location where the injury occurred, circumstances of injury, and other selected characteristics. This report introduces additional incident and circumstance variables, which now include child victim-specific circumstance information. This report also incorporates new U.S. Census Bureau race and ethnicity categories, which now account for more than one race and Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander categories and include updated denominators to calculate rates for these populations.
    2021.
    NVDRS collects data regarding violent deaths from death certificates, coroner and medical examiner records, and law enforcement reports. This report includes data collected for violent deaths that occurred in 2021. Data were collected from 48 states (all states with exception of Florida and Hawaii), the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. Forty-six states had statewide data, two additional states had data from counties representing a subset of their population (31 California counties, representing 64% of its population, and 13 Texas counties, representing 63% of its population), and the District of Columbia and Puerto Rico had jurisdiction-wide data. NVDRS collates information for each violent death and links deaths that are related (e.g., multiple homicides, homicide followed by suicide, or multiple suicides) into a single incident.
    For 2021, NVDRS collected information on 68,866 fatal incidents involving 70,688 deaths that occurred in 48 states (46 states collecting statewide data, 31 California counties, and 13 Texas counties), and the District of Columbia. The deaths captured in NVDRS accounted for 86.5% of all homicides, legal intervention deaths, suicides, unintentional firearm injury deaths, and deaths of undetermined intent in the United States in 2021. In addition, information was collected for 816 fatal incidents involving 880 deaths in Puerto Rico. Data for Puerto Rico were analyzed separately. Of the 70,688 deaths, the majority (58.2%) were suicides, followed by homicides (31.5%), deaths of undetermined intent that might be due to violence (8.2%), legal intervention deaths (1.3%) (i.e., deaths caused by law enforcement and other persons with legal authority to use deadly force acting in the line of duty, excluding legal executions), and unintentional firearm injury deaths (<1.0%). The term \"legal intervention\" is a classification incorporated into the International Classification of Diseases, Tenth Revision, and does not denote the lawfulness or legality of the circumstances surrounding a death caused by law enforcement.Demographic patterns and circumstances varied by manner of death. The suicide rate was higher for males than for females. Across all age groups, the suicide rate was highest among adults aged ≥85 years. In addition, non-Hispanic American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) persons had the highest suicide rates among all racial and ethnic groups. Among both males and females, the most common method of injury for suicide was a firearm. Among all suicide victims, when circumstances were known (84.4%), suicide was most often preceded by a mental health, intimate partner, or physical health problem or by a recent or impending crisis during the previous or upcoming 2 weeks. The homicide rate was higher for males than for females. Among all homicide victims, the homicide rate was highest among persons aged 20-24 years compared with other age groups. Non-Hispanic Black or African American (Black) males experienced the highest homicide rate of any racial or ethnic group. Among all homicide victims, the most common method of injury was a firearm. When the relationship between a homicide victim and a suspect was known, the suspect was most frequently an acquaintance or friend for male victims and a current or former intimate partner for female victims. Homicide most often was precipitated by an argument or conflict, occurred in conjunction with another crime, or, for female victims, was related to intimate partner violence. Nearly all victims of legal intervention deaths were male, and the legal intervention death rate was highest among men aged 30-34 years. The legal intervention death rate was highest among AI/AN males, followed by Black males. A firearm was used in the majority of legal intervention deaths. When circumstances were known, the most frequent circumstances reported for legal intervention deaths were as follows: the victim used a weapon in the incident and the victim had a substance use problem (other than alcohol use). Other causes of death included unintentional firearm injury deaths and deaths of undetermined intent. Unintentional firearm injury deaths were most frequently experienced by males, non-Hispanic White (White) persons, and persons aged 15-24 years. These deaths most frequently occurred while the shooter was playing with a firearm and were precipitated by a person unintentionally pulling the trigger. The rate of deaths of undetermined intent was highest among males, particularly among AI/AN and Black males, and among adults aged 30-54 years. Poisoning was the most common method of injury in deaths of undetermined intent, and opioids were detected in nearly 80% of decedents tested for those substances.
    This report provides a detailed summary of data from NVDRS on violent deaths that occurred in 2021. The suicide rate was highest among AI/AN and White males, whereas the homicide rate was highest among Black males. Intimate partner violence precipitated a large proportion of homicides for females. Mental health problems, intimate partner problems, interpersonal conflicts, and acute life stressors were primary precipitating circumstances for multiple types of deaths examined.
    Violence is preventable, and data can guide public health action. NVDRS data are used to monitor the occurrence of violence-related fatal injuries and assist public health authorities in developing, implementing, and evaluating programs, policies, and practices to reduce and prevent violent deaths. NVDRS data can be used to enhance prevention efforts into actionable strategies. States or jurisdictions have used their Violent Death Reporting System (VDRS) data to guide suicide prevention efforts and highlight where additional focus is needed. For example, North Carolina VDRS program data have played a significant role in expanding activities related to firearm safety and injury prevention. The program served as a primary data source for partners, which led to the creation of the Office of Violence Prevention in the state, focusing on combatting firearm-related deaths. In Maine, the VDRS provided data on law enforcement officer suicides that were used to help support a bill mandating mental health resiliency and awareness training in the state\'s law enforcement training academy, along with plans for similar training addressing mental health, substance use, and alcohol problems among corrections officers. In addition, states and jurisdictions have also used their VDRS data to examine factors related to homicide in their state or jurisdiction. For example, Georgia VDRS collaborated with the City of Atlanta Mayor\'s Office of Violence Reduction to develop two public dashboards that not only offer comprehensive data on violent deaths but also present data on the geographic distribution of populations disproportionately affected by violence to help inform violence prevention interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    过度限制的临床试验资格标准会降低普遍性,注册慢,不成比例地排除了历史上代表性不足的人口。分析了由国家老龄化研究所资助的196项阿尔茨海默病和相关痴呆(AD/ADRD)试验的资格标准,以确定共同标准及其可能按种族/民族不成比例地排除参与者。试验按类型分类(48期I/II药理学,7III/IV期药理学,128非药理学,7诊断,和6个神经精神病学)和目标人群(51个AD/ADRD,58轻度认知障碍,25有风险,和62认知正常)。合格标准被编码为以下类别:医疗,神经学,精神病,和程序。进行了文献检索,以描述非洲裔美国人/黑人(AA/B)的资格标准差异的普遍性,西班牙裔/拉丁裔(H/L),美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)和夏威夷原住民/太平洋岛民(NH/PI)人口。试验的中位数为15个标准。最常见的标准是年龄截止(87%的试验),指定的神经系统(65%),和精神疾病(61%)。代表性不足的群体可能会被16个资格类别不成比例地排除在外;42%的试验仅在其标准中指定了讲英语的人。大多数试验(82%)包含操作性较差的标准(即,没有明确定义的标准,可以有多种解释/实施方式)和可能减少种族/族裔入学多样性的标准。
    Overly restrictive clinical trial eligibility criteria can reduce generalizability, slow enrollment, and disproportionately exclude historically underrepresented populations. The eligibility criteria for 196 Alzheimer\'s Disease and Related Dementias (AD/ADRD) trials funded by the National Institute on Aging were analyzed to identify common criteria and their potential to disproportionately exclude participants by race/ethnicity. The trials were categorized by type (48 Phase I/II pharmacological, 7 Phase III/IV pharmacological, 128 non-pharmacological, 7 diagnostic, and 6 neuropsychiatric) and target population (51 AD/ADRD, 58 Mild Cognitive Impairment, 25 at-risk, and 62 cognitively normal). Eligibility criteria were coded into the following categories: Medical, Neurologic, Psychiatric, and Procedural. A literature search was conducted to describe the prevalence of disparities for eligibility criteria for African Americans/Black (AA/B), Hispanic/Latino (H/L), American Indian/Alaska Native (AI/AN) and Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander (NH/PI) populations. The trials had a median of 15 criteria. The most frequent criterion were age cutoffs (87% of trials), specified neurologic (65%), and psychiatric disorders (61%). Underrepresented groups could be disproportionately excluded by 16 eligibility categories; 42% of trials specified English-speakers only in their criteria. Most trials (82%) contain poorly operationalized criteria (i.e., criteria not well defined that can have multiple interpretations/means of implementation) and criteria that may reduce racial/ethnic enrollment diversity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:提供个人人口统计信息是美国的常规做法,然而,对这一过程的影响知之甚少。本研究旨在研究美国多种族/族裔成年人在披露种族/族裔身份时的经验和观点。
    方法:对被认定为多种族/族裔的成年人进行了17次半结构化访谈。参与者的多种族/种族身份包括黑人或非裔美国人和白人;黑人或非裔美国人,美洲印第安人或阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)和西班牙裔或拉丁裔;黑人或非裔美国人和西班牙裔或拉丁裔;黑人或非裔美国人和AI/AN;AI/AN和白人和亚洲人,夏威夷原住民或太平洋岛民和白人。多个参与者报告说,对于任何单一的广泛类别,都与多个种族群体进行了识别。三个被认定为性少数群体。九个是千禧一代;六个是X世代;一个是Z世代;一个是婴儿潮一代。使用分阶段混合归纳-演绎主题分析对定性数据进行分析。
    结果:由于用于获取数据的方法,种族和族裔身份的披露为多种族/族裔人群提供了独特的压力源,身份和表型的感知不匹配和暴露于偏见。社会规范,结构和运动会影响多种族/族裔人士向外部政党指示的类别。
    结论:多种族/民族成年人在识别种族/民族时面临的压力和负面情绪强调了标准人口统计问题对人口中包容性和可见性的更广泛影响。
    收集有关个人种族和民族背景的数据是一种标准做法,然而,对于那些认同多个群体或看不到他们的身份反映在提供的选项中的人来说,这可能会带来挑战。这些人在披露身份时可能会感到被排斥或受到不公平待遇,导致巨大的压力。随着这种数据收集频率的增加,至关重要的是,这些问题要有同情心和公平地提出,坚定致力于在整个过程中增强包容性。
    OBJECTIVE: Providing personal demographic information is routine practice in the United States, and yet, little is known about the impacts of this process. This study aims to examine the experiences and perspectives of Multiracial/ethnic adults in the United States when disclosing racial/ethnic identity.
    METHODS: Seventeen semistructured interviews were conducted with adults identifying as Multiracial/ethnic. The Multiracial/ethnic identities of participants included Black or African American and White; Black or African American, American Indian or Alaska Native (AI/AN) and Hispanic or Latino; Black or African American and Hispanic or Latino; Black or African American and AI/AN; AI/AN and White and Asian, Native Hawaiian or Pacific Islander and White. Multiple participants reported identifying with multiple ethnic groups for any single broad category. Three identified as sexual minorities. Nine were Millennials; six were Gen X; one was Gen Z; one was Baby Boomer. Qualitative data were analyzed using staged hybrid inductive-deductive thematic analysis.
    RESULTS: Disclosure of racial and ethnic identities presents a unique stressor for Multiracial/ethnic populations due to methods used to obtain data, perceived mismatch of identity and phenotype and exposure to prejudice. Social norms, constructs and movements impact the categories that a Multiracial/ethnic person indicates to external parties.
    CONCLUSIONS: The stress and negative feelings that Multiracial/ethnic adults face when identifying their race/ethnicity underscore the broader implications of standard demographic questions on feelings of inclusivity and visibility within a population.
    UNASSIGNED: Gathering data on individuals\' racial and ethnic backgrounds is a standard practice, and yet, it can pose challenges for those who identify with multiple groups or do not see their identities reflected in the options provided. Such individuals may feel excluded or experience unfair treatment when disclosing their identity, leading to significant stress. As the frequency of this data collection increases, it is essential that the questions are posed empathetically and equitably, with a strong commitment to enhancing inclusivity throughout the process.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管有历史和当代的创伤,美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AIAN;土著)社区对COVID-19大流行做出了反应。然而,AIAN经历了不成比例的感染率,住院治疗,死亡,减少预期寿命。学校关闭加剧了差距,导致学习损失,经济不稳定,和AIAN青年的心理健康挑战。
    方法:SafeSchools项目队列研究采用了综合纵向收敛混合方法,整合基于社区的参与式研究原则。该研究招募了纳瓦霍民族的照顾者,他们的孩子有资格参加当地的预订学校。我们对2021年8月至2022年5月收集的护理人员自我报告基线数据进行了分析。
    结果:共有242名护理人员完成了至少部分基线评估,并纳入数据分析。照顾者主要是女性(88.7%),非西班牙裔(97%),土著(97%)。大多数护理人员都在30多岁(平均年龄38岁),不同的教育背景和就业状况。儿童在男性和女性之间平均分配,并分布在不同年龄段。大多数儿童以各种形式在基线上上学,包括面对面,混合动力车,和仅在线设置。看护者报告了一系列的社会心理和行为风险,包括一般的精神困扰,抑郁症状,对自己和孩子的焦虑。此外,照顾者和儿童表现出各种保护因素,比如强烈的文化认同,弹性,和学业自我效能感。
    结论:这项研究强调了参与的照顾者和儿童的心理健康困扰率高于全国平均水平。尽管面临这些挑战,文化保护因素仍然很强,应该指导未来的危机应对工作。
    BACKGROUND: Despite historical and contemporary trauma, American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN; Indigenous) communities responded with resilience to the COVID-19 pandemic. However, AIANs experienced disproportionate rates of infection, hospitalization, death, and reduced life expectancy. School closures exacerbated disparities, leading to learning loss, economic instability, and mental health challenges among AIAN youth.
    METHODS: The Project SafeSchools cohort study employed a comprehensive longitudinal convergent mixed-methods approach, integrating community-based participatory research principles. The study enrolled Navajo Nation caregivers whose children were eligible to attend local reservation-based schools. We conducted an analysis of caregiver self-report baseline data collected between August 2021 and May 2022.
    RESULTS: A total of 242 caregivers completed at least part of the baseline assessment and were included in data analysis. Caregivers were primarily female (88.7%), non-Hispanic (97%), and Indigenous (97%). Most caregivers were in their late 30s (mean age 38), with varying educational backgrounds and employment statuses. Children were evenly split between males and females and distributed across different age groups. Most children attended school at baseline in various formats, including in-person, hybrid, and online-only settings. Caregivers reported a range of psychosocial and behavioral risks, including general mental distress, depressive symptoms, and anxiety for themselves and their children. Furthermore, caregivers and children exhibited various protective factors, such as strong cultural identity, resilience, and academic self-efficacy.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the higher rates of mental health distress among participating caregivers and children compared to national averages. Despite these challenges, cultural protective factors remained strong and should guide future crisis response efforts.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AIAN)的学生是美国在生物医学和健康科学领域相对于人口规模而言代表性最低的群体,对长期研究教育计划和结果跟踪知之甚少。20多年来,美国原住民癌症预防合作伙伴关系(NACP)得到了美国国家癌症研究所(NCI)资助的促进癌症健康平等全面合作伙伴关系(CPACHE)计划的支持。编程包括动手指导研究和一系列发展机会。一个经过验证的跟踪系统,结合了参与记录,机构记录,以及国家学生信息交换所文件的入学/学位成绩。NACP总共(2002-2022年)聘用了367名AIAN学员,其中237个人获得了220个单身汉,87大师,和34个博士/专业学位。大约45%的AIAN博士获得者目前从事学术或临床工作,和10%的行业或部落领导。共有238名AIAN学生参加了指导研究,85%的人表现出强劲的成果;51%获得学位,目前有34%注册。健壮的跟踪系统的实施记录了一段时间内达到程度的加速度。接下来的步骤将评估对学生成绩最有影响力的培训活动。
    Although American Indian and Alaska Native (AIAN) students are the most underrepresented group in the U.S. in biomedical and health sciences relative to population size, little is known about long-term research education programs and outcome tracking. For over 20 years, the Partnership for Native American Cancer Prevention (NACP) has been supported under the National Cancer Institute\'s (NCI)-funded Comprehensive Partnerships to Advance Cancer Health Equity (CPACHE) program. Programming included hands-on mentored research and an array of development opportunities. A validated tracking system combining participation records, institutional records, and enrollment/degree attainment from the National Student Clearinghouse documents outcomes. Collectively (2002-2022) NACP engaged 367 AIAN trainees, of whom 237 individuals earned 220 bachelors, 87 masters, and 34 doctoral/professional degrees. Approximately 45% of AIAN doctoral recipients are currently engaged in academic or clinical work, and 10% in industry or tribal leadership. A total of 238 AIAN students participated in mentored research, with 85% demonstrating strong outcomes; 51% attained a degree, and 34% are currently enrolled. Implementation of a robust tracking system documented acceleration in degree attainment over time. Next steps will evaluate the most impactful training activities on student outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:意外伤害不成比例地影响美洲印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民(AI/AN)人群。制定有效且符合文化要求的数据收集和干预计划,需要了解AI/AN社区过去的预防工作。但关于该主题的同行评审文献有限。本范围审查旨在总结已发表在初级保健提供者通讯中的工作,印度卫生局提供的灰色文献来源。
    方法:研究小组获得了提供者时事通讯中所有与伤害相关的文章,并排除了那些没有描述意外伤害预防工作的文章。包括的文章按时间顺序和主题组织,结果以数据抽象形式描述。
    结果:总共筛选了来自提供者通讯的247篇文章,和68个被包括在这次审查中。2007年发表的文章最多(n=15)。许多人不是专门关注一个部落社区,而是关注整个AI/AN社区(n=27),而其他人报告说,某些部落是研究的重点,但没有通过名称来识别部落(n=24)。以下是明确提到的14个部落社区的列表:奥马哈,切诺基,尤特,Yakama,Chippewa,Apache,Ho-Chunk,乌鸦部落,TohonoO\'odham国家,莫哈韦堡部落,Chemehuevi部落,玫瑰花蕾部落,纳瓦霍人,和杰梅斯的普韦布洛。已发布的意外伤害预防工作涵盖了AI/AN社区的以下7个主题:跌倒,机动车碰撞,中毒,改进数据,烧伤,孩子们,和其他。
    结论:本范围审查提供了在AI/AN社区开展的伤害预防工作的可用和可搜索的信息,这些信息目前在同行评审的文献中没有发现。
    BACKGROUND: Unintentional injuries disproportionately impact American Indian and Alaska Native (AI/AN) populations. Developing effective and culturally tailored data collection and intervention programs requires an understanding of past prevention efforts in AI/AN communities, but limited peer-reviewed literature on the topic is available. This scoping review aims to summarize efforts that have been published in the Primary Care Provider newsletter, a source of gray literature available through the Indian Health Service.
    METHODS: The research team obtained all injury related articles in the Provider newsletter and excluded those that did not describe an unintentional injury prevention effort. Included articles were organized chronologically and by topic, and outcomes were described in a data abstraction form.
    RESULTS: A total of 247 articles from the Provider newsletter were screened, and 68 were included in this review. The most number of articles were published in 2007 (n = 15). Many focused not specifically on one tribal community but on the AI/AN community as a whole (n = 27), while others reported that certain tribes were the focus of study but did not identify tribes by name (n = 24). The following is a list of 14 tribal communities explicitly mentioned: Omaha, Cherokee, Ute, Yakama, Chippewa, Apache, Ho-Chunk, The Crow Tribe, Tohono O\'odham Nation, Fort Mojave Tribe, Chemehuevi Tribe, The Rosebud Tribe, Navajo, and The Pueblo of Jemez. Published unintentional injury prevention efforts have covered the following 7 topics in AI/AN communities: falls, motor vehicle crashes, poisonings, improving data, burns, children, and other.
    CONCLUSIONS: This scoping review makes available and searchable information on injury prevention work conducted in and for AI/AN communities that is not currently found in the peer-reviewed literature.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多发性骨髓瘤(MM)是一种浆细胞疾病,约占血液恶性肿瘤的10%。关于美国MM的长期趋势和差异的流行病学证据有限。我们使用来自监测的MM发病率数据进行了多时间点横断面研究,流行病学,和最终结果(SEER)数据库和死亡率数据来自CDC广泛的流行病学研究在线数据(CDCWONDER)1999年至2020年之间的死亡原因数据库。在此期间,MM发病率稳步上升,虽然MM死亡率稳步下降,有很大的种族和民族差异。非西班牙裔黑人的发病率最高,到2020年,这一数字从1999年的12.02(95%CI10.54,13.64)一直上升到每100,000人口14.20(95%CI12.93,15.55)。1999年,非西班牙裔美洲印第安人/土著阿拉斯加人和亚洲/太平洋岛民的发病率最低,为每100,000人口5.59(95%CI2.69,10.04)和3.56(95%CI2.94,4.27),为每100,000人口5.76(95%CI3.49,8.90)和3.92(95%CI3.46,4.42),分别,到2020年。按性别分列的差异,年龄,美国人口普查区,并观察到乡村,强调有针对性的重要性,针对风险人群的以公平为中心的干预措施和MM筛查计划。
    Multiple myeloma (MM) is a plasma cell disorder accounting for approximately 10% of hematologic malignancies. There is limited epidemiological evidence regarding the long-term trends and disparities in MM in the US. We conducted a multiple time point cross-sectional study using MM incidence rate data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and mortality data from the CDC Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (CDC WONDER) Underlying Cause of Death database between 1999 and 2020. During this period, MM incidence has steadily increased, while MM mortality has steadily decreased, with substantial racial and ethnic disparities. Non-Hispanic Black individuals exhibited the highest incidence rates, which consistently rose from 12.02 (95% CI 10.54, 13.64) in 1999 to 14.20 (95% CI 12.93, 15.55) per 100,000 population by 2020. Non-Hispanic American Indian/Native Alaskans and Asian/Pacific Islanders demonstrated the lowest incidence rates of 5.59 (95% CI 2.69, 10.04) and 3.56 (95% CI 2.94, 4.27) per 100,000 population in 1999 to 5.76 (95% CI 3.49, 8.90) and 3.92 (95% CI 3.46, 4.42) per 100,000 population, respectively, by 2020. Disparities by gender, age, US census region, and rurality were observed, underscoring the importance of targeted, equity-centered interventions and MM screening initiatives for at-risk populations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号