hospitalization

住院
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:深静脉血栓(DVT)是威胁人类健康和经济发展的严重公共卫生问题。目前,不同民族个体DVT患病率的差异,高海拔地区的居民,那些吃任何特殊饮食的人是未知的。因此,我们旨在阐明高原地区住院患者DVT的患病率和相关危险因素.
    方法:研究对象为青海省三家三级甲等医院住院患者,中国,2020年1月至10月。人口统计,临床,入院时收集实验室数据,并进行了双侧下肢的超声检查。出院时记录住院时间。
    结果:共纳入3432例患者,其中159例(4.60%)诊断为DVT。年龄>50岁(OR=2.434,95%CI:1.521-3.894252,P<0.001),居住高度≥3000米(OR=2.346,95%CI:1.239-4.440,P=0.009),D-二聚体水平≥0.5mg/L(OR=2.211,95%CI:1.547-3.161,P<0.001),合并症的存在(OR=1.904,95%CI:1.386-2.705,P<0.001),静脉曲张病史(OR=1.990,95%CI:0.959-4.128,P=0.045),和目前的药物治疗(OR=2.484,95%CI:1.778-3.471,P<0.001)被确定为这些高原地区DVT的危险因素。
    结论:高原地区住院患者DVT的患病率为4.60%。我们建议考虑个性化风险分层(年龄>50岁,居住高度≥3000m,静脉曲张病史,D-二聚体水平≥0.5mg/L,目前的药物,和合并症)入院时的患者。
    BACKGROUND: Deep venous thrombosis (DVT) is a serious public health issue that threatens human health and economic development. Presently, differences in the prevalence of DVT among individuals from different nationalities, residents of high-altitude areas, and those consuming any special diet are unknown. Therefore, we aimed to elucidate the prevalence of and the associated risk factors for DVT in hospitalized patients in the plateau areas.
    METHODS: The subjects were hospitalized patients in three grade III-a hospitals in the Qinghai Province, China, during January-October 2020. The demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected at admission, and ultrasonography of the bilateral lower extremities was performed. The hospital stay-duration was recorded at the time of discharge.
    RESULTS: A total of 3432 patients were enrolled, of which 159 (4.60%) were diagnosed with DVT. The age of > 50 years (OR = 2.434, 95% CI: 1.521-3.894252, P < 0.001), residence altitude of ≥ 3000 m (OR = 2.346, 95% CI: 1.239-4.440, P = 0.009), D-dimer level of ≥ 0.5 mg/L (OR = 2.211, 95% CI: 1.547-3.161, P < 0.001), presence of comorbidities (OR = 1.904, 95% CI: 1.386-2.705, P < 0.001), a history of varicose veins (OR = 1.990, 95% CI: 0.959-4.128, P = 0.045), and current medications (OR = 2.484, 95% CI: 1.778-3.471, P < 0.001) were identified as risk factors for DVT in these plateau areas.
    CONCLUSIONS: The prevalence of DVT in the hospitalized patients of the studied plateau areas was 4.60%. We recommend considering individualized risk stratification (age > 50 years, residence altitude ≥ 3000 m, a history of varicose veins, D-dimer level ≥ 0.5 mg/L, current medications, and comorbidities) for patients at the time of admission.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    在急性呼吸道感染领域,冠状病毒病-19(COVID-19),由严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)引起,构成全球公共卫生挑战。皮质类固醇(CSs)在COVID-19中的应用仍然是研究人员的争议话题。因此,我们的团队对随机对照试验(RCTs)进行了全面的荟萃分析,以仔细评估CSs在住院COVID-19患者中的安全性和有效性.探讨CSs治疗COVID-19的疗效,我们仔细筛选了关键数据库的RCT,包括PubMed,WebofScience,Embase,科克伦图书馆,ClinicalTrials.gov,以及中国CNKI和万方数据。我们专注于评估28天死亡率。我们使用卡方检验和I2值评估了数据异质性,将显著性设置为0.1%和50%。分析了涉及5721名参与者的21个RCT的数据。分析未显示CSs干预与住院COVID-19患者28天死亡风险之间存在显著关联(相对风险[RR]=0.93;95%置信区间[95%CI]:0.84-1.03;P=0.15)。然而,亚组分析显示,中重度COVID-19患者28日死亡率显著降低(RR为0.85;95%CI:0.76~0.95;P=0.004).具体来说,短期CS给药(≤3天)与临床结局的实质性改善相关(RR=0.24;95%CI:0.09-0.63;P=0.004),长期使用(≥8天)(RR=0.88;95%CI:0.77-0.99;P=0.04).此外,在中重度COVID-19患者中,给予地塞米松增加了28天的无呼吸机天数(平均差=1.92;95%CI:0.44~3.40;P=0.01).甲基强的松龙在改善临床结局方面也显示出显著的益处(RR=0.24;95%CI:0.09-0.63;P=0.004)。我们的荟萃分析表明,尽管住院COVID-19患者的28天死亡率没有显着差异,CSs的使用可能有利于改善中度或重度COVID-19患者的临床结局.与使用CSs相关的不良事件发生率没有显著增加。我们的荟萃分析提供了证据,尽管CSs可能不适合所有COVID-19患者,它们在重症COVID-19患者中可能是有效和安全的。因此,建议在COVID-19病例的个性化治疗中使用CSs,以改善临床结局,同时将不良事件降至最低.
    In the realm of acute respiratory infections, coronavirus disease-19 (COVID-19), caused by severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), poses a global public health challenge. The application of corticosteroids (CSs) in COVID-19 remains a contentious topic among researchers. Accordingly, our team performed a comprehensive meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to meticulously evaluate the safety and efficacy of CSs in hospitalized COVID-19 patients. To explore efficacy of CSs in the treatment of COVID-19 patients, we meticulously screened RCTs across key databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov, as well as China\'s CNKI and Wanfang Data. We focused on assessing the 28 days mortality rates. We evaluated the data heterogeneity using the Chi-square test and I2 values, setting significance at 0.1 and 50%. Data from 21 RCTs involving 5721 participants were analyzed. The analysis did not demonstrate a significant association between CSs intervention and the 28 days mortality risk in hospitalized COVID-19 patients (relative risk [RR] = 0.93; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 0.84-1.03; P = 0.15). However, subgroup analysis revealed a significant reduction in 28 days mortality among patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19 (RR at 0.85; 95% CI: 0.76-0.95; P = 0.004). Specifically, short-term CS administration (≤ 3 days) was associated with a substantial improvement in clinical outcomes (RR = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.09-0.63; P = 0.004), as was longer-term use (≥ 8 days) (RR = 0.88; 95% CI: 0.77-0.99; P = 0.04). Additionally, in patients with moderate-to-severe COVID-19, the administration of dexamethasone increased the number of 28 days ventilator-free days (Mean Difference = 1.92; 95% CI: 0.44-3.40; P = 0.01). Methylprednisolone also demonstrated significant benefits in improving clinical outcomes (RR = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.09-0.63; P = 0.004). Our meta-analysis demonstrated that although there is no significant difference in 28 days mortality rates among hospitalized COVID-19 patients, the use of CSs may be beneficial in improving clinical outcomes in moderate or severe COVID-19 patients. There was no significant increase in the occurrence of adverse events associated with the use of CSs. Our meta-analysis provides evidence that while CSs may not be suitable for all COVID-19 patients, they could be effective and safe in severely ill COVID-19 patients. Consequently, it is recommended to administer CSs for personalized treatments in COVID-19 cases to improve the clinical outcomes while minimizing adverse events.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在长时间的COVID-19大流行期间,医院成为常态化防控的重点。在这项研究中,我们调查了在该部门的公众微信账户中开发的癌症患者住院床位预约系统的可行性。我们还探讨了其在提高运营效率和护理质量管理方面的作用,以及优化护理人员的部署。
    方法:我们利用微信促进癌症患者和医疗保健专业人员之间的沟通。此外,我们收集了招生数据,放电,平均住院天数,床利用率,以及住院患者通过医院信息系统和护士占用的床位天数?通过护士调度系统的工作时间和能力水平。计算每位患者每天的平均护理时间。通过住院床位预约系统,被录取的人数,拒绝录取,并从预订系统收集取消的招生。通过比较预约前后住院出院人数,分析预约床位制度对科室运作效率的影响,以及平均住院率和床位利用率。通过比较护士?每月工作时间和每位患者每天的平均护理时间,该制度对护士工作时间和护理质量指标的影响进行了分析。
    结果:平均住院时间,床利用率,和护士?工作时间明显减少,预约制度实施后,每位患者每天的平均护理小时数明显较高。癌症患者全周期病床信息化管理模式不影响患者出院人数。
    结论:患者能够使用科室基于微信的官方住院床位预约系统提前在家预约床位类型,使护士能够提前准备工作。这反过来又提高了科室的运作效率和护理质量,它优化了护理人员的部署。
    BACKGROUND: During the prolonged COVID-19 pandemic, hospitals became focal points for normalised prevention and control. In this study, we investigated the feasibility of an inpatient bed reservation system for cancer patients that was developed in the department?s public WeChat account. We also explored its role in improving operational efficiency and nursing quality management, as well as in optimising nursing workforce deployment.
    METHODS: We utilised WeChat to facilitate communication between cancer patients and health care professionals. Furthermore, we collected data on admissions, discharges, average number of hospitalisation days, bed utilisation rate, and the number of bed days occupied by hospitalised patients through the hospital information system and nurses? working hours and competency levels through the nurse scheduling system. The average nursing hours per patient per day were calculated. Through the inpatient bed reservation system, the number of accepted admissions, denied admissions, and cancelled admissions from the reservation system were collected. The impact of the bed reservation system on the department?s operational efficiency was analysed by comparing the number of hospitalisation discharges before and after reservations, as well as the average hospitalisation and bed utilisation rates. By comparing nurses? working hours per month and average nursing hours per patient per day, the system?s impact on nurses? working hours and nursing quality indicators was analysed.
    RESULTS: The average hospitalisation length, bed utilisation rate, and nurses? working hours were significantly lower, and the average number of nursing hours per patient per day was significantly higher after the implementation of the reservation system. The full-cycle bed information management model for cancer patients did not affect the number of discharged patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients? ability to reserve bed types from home in advance using the department?s official WeChat-based inpatient bed reservation system allowed nurses to prepare for their work ahead of time. This in turn improved the operational efficiency of the department and nursing quality, and it optimised the deployment of the nursing workforce.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本综述旨在全面总结有和无谵妄的老年住院患者抗胆碱能药物负荷(ADB)评分的差异。
    方法:我们搜索了PubMed,Embase,WebofScience,Cochrane图书馆和CINAHLEBSCOhost数据库用于确定前瞻性队列研究,探索ADB与老年住院患者谵妄发生之间的关系。审查的主要结果是谵妄和非谵妄组的平均ADB评分,次要结局是亚综合征组和非谵妄组的评分.使用固定效应方法合并标准化平均差(SMD)和相应的95%置信区间(95%CI)。此外,我们根据入院类型进行亚组分析,年龄,ADB量表类型和ADB分类。
    结果:纳入9项前瞻性队列研究,涉及3791名年龄中位数为75.1(71.6-83.9)的老年患者。谵妄组ADB评分明显高于非谵妄组(SMD=0.21,95CI0.13~0.28)。在亚组分析中,根据老年人的中位年龄,将年龄亚组分为<75和≥75.在各种亚组中,有谵妄的老年人和无谵妄的老年人之间的ADB评分存在显着差异:手术(SMD=0.20,95CI0.12-0.28),内科(SMD=0.64,95CI0.25-1.02),年龄<75(SMD=0.17,95CI0.08-0.26),年龄≥75(SMD=0.27,95CI0.15-0.39),ADS量表(SMD=0.13,95CI0.13-0.40),ARS刻度(SMD=0.15,95CI0.03-0.26),ACB量表(SMD=0.13,95CI0.01-0.25),入院前ADB(SMD=0.24,95CI0.05-0.43)和住院期间ADB(SMD=0.20,95CI0.12-0.27)。
    结论:我们发现,在内科和外科收治的老年患者中,ADB与谵妄之间存在定量关系。这种关系在不同的年龄仍然很重要,ADB量表类型及ADB分类亚组。然而,谵妄患者与无谵妄患者ADB评分的实际差异较小.应开展更多高质量的观察性研究,以探讨ADB对谵妄和亚综合征谵妄的影响。
    背景:该方案发表在国际前瞻性系统审查注册中心(PROSPERO)[Ref:CRD42022353649]。
    OBJECTIVE: This review aims to comprehensively summarize the differences in anticholinergic drug burden (ADB) scores between older hospitalized patients with and without delirium.
    METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, Cochrane Library and CINAHL EBSCOhost databases to identify prospective cohort studies exploring the relationship between ADB and the occurrence of delirium in older hospitalized patients. The primary outcome of the review was the mean ADB scores for the delirium and non-delirium groups, and the secondary outcome was the scores for the subsyndromal and non-delirium groups. The standardized mean difference (SMD) and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) were incorporated using a fixed-effect method. Moreover, we performed subgroup analysis according to the admission type, age, the ADB scale type and the ADB classification.
    RESULTS: Nine prospective cohort studies involving 3791 older patients with a median age of 75.1 (71.6-83.9) were included. The ADB score was significantly higher in the delirium group than in the non-delirium group (SMD = 0.21, 95%CI 0.13-0.28). In subgroup analysis, the age subgroup was split into < 75 and ≥ 75 according to the median age of the older people. There were significant differences in ADB scores between older people with delirium and those without delirium in various subgroups: surgical (SMD = 0.20, 95%CI 0.12-0.28), internal medicine (SMD = 0.64, 95%CI 0.25-1.02), age < 75 (SMD = 0.17, 95%CI 0.08-0.26), age ≥ 75 (SMD = 0.27, 95%CI 0.15-0.39), ADS scale (SMD = 0.13, 95%CI 0.13-0.40), ARS scale (SMD = 0.15, 95%CI 0.03-0.26), ACB scale (SMD = 0.13, 95%CI 0.01-0.25), pre-admission ADB (SMD = 0.24, 95%CI 0.05-0.43) and ADB during hospitalization (SMD = 0.20, 95%CI 0.12-0.27).
    CONCLUSIONS: We found a quantitative relationship between ADB and delirium in older patients admitted for internal medicine and surgery. And this relationship remained significant in different age, ADB scale type and ADB classification subgroups. However, the actual difference in ADB scores between patients with delirium and without delirium was small. More high-quality observational studies should be conducted to explore the impact of ADB on delirium and subsyndromal delirium.
    BACKGROUND: The protocol was published in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) [Ref: CRD42022353649].
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们进行了系统评价和荟萃分析,以检测慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)对射血分数保留(HFpEF)的心力衰竭患者预后的影响。我们从三个电子数据库中系统地筛选了符合条件的文献,PubMed,EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆,到2023年4月。两名研究人员独立参与了数据收集。纳入研究的风险比(RR)与95%置信区间(CI)汇集在审查管理器版本5.40软件使用随机效应模型进行分析。本荟萃分析共纳入11项研究(3项RCT事后分析和8项观察性研究),其中18.602名参与者。汇集所有符合条件的研究数据后,我们的结果表明COPD与住院风险增加相关(RR=1.66,95%CI,1.47-1.87,P<0.00001),死亡率(RR=1.62,95%CI,1.34-1.95,P<0.00001),HFpEF患者的住院率或死亡率构成(RR=1.84,95%CI,1.35-2.51,P<0.001)。在亚组分析中,合并COPD的HFpEF患者的心血管相关死亡风险(RR=1.59,95%CI,1.30-1.93,P<0.00001)和出院后死亡风险(RR=2.57,1.34-4.93,P<0.01)增加,在HF导致的住院中也检测到这些关联(RR=1.64,95%CI,1.44-1.87,P<0.00001).现有研究的证据支持COPD是HFpEF患者的独立预后危险因素。开发快速的临床诊断指标和早期使用SGLT-2和ARNI等新药可能会改善该人群的预后。值得进一步研究。
    We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to detect the impact of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) on the prognosis of heart failure patients with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). We systematically screened eligible literature from three electronic databases, PubMed, EMBASE and Cochrane Library, up to April 2023. Two researchers participated in data collection independently. Risk ratios (RRs) from included studies with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were pooled in the Review Manager version 5.40 software using a random-effects model for analysis. A total of 11 studies (3 post hoc analyses of RCTs and 8 observational studies) with 18 602 participants were included in this meta-analysis. After pooling all the data from eligible studies, our results indicated that COPD was associated with an increased risk of hospitalization (RR = 1.66, 95% CI, 1.47-1.87, P < 0.00001), mortality (RR = 1.62, 95% CI, 1.34-1.95, P < 0.00001), and the composition of hospitalization or mortality (RR = 1.84, 95% CI, 1.35-2.51, P < 0.001) in patients with HFpEF. In a subgroup analysis, the risks of cardiovascular-related mortality (RR = 1.59, 95% CI, 1.30-1.93, P < 0.00001) and post-discharge mortality risk (RR = 2.57, 1.34-4.93, P < 0.01) were increased in HFpEF patients comorbid with COPD, and these associations were also detected in HF-caused hospitalization (RR = 1.64, 95% CI, 1.44-1.87, P < 0.00001). Evidence from existing studies supported that COPD was an independent prognostic risk factor for patients with HFpEF. Developing rapid clinical diagnostic indicators and early use of novel drugs such as SGLT-2 and ARNI may improve the prognosis of this population, deserving further study.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:分析西南地区某大型三级综合医院2年诊断为脓毒症的住院患者的流行病学特征。探讨脓毒症患者死亡的相关危险因素。
    方法:对2021年9月1日至2023年8月31日四川省人民医院收治的脓毒症患者进行回顾性研究,并以性别、年龄,放电诊断,出院部门,住院费用,逗留时间,收集住院期间的预后。比较两组患者的基线,采用多因素Logistic回归分析脓毒症患者院内死亡原因的危险因素。
    结果:共纳入3568例脓毒症患者,中位年龄为58岁(35,74)。在所有患者中,男性2147人(60.17%)。住院时间中位数为13(8,24)天,住院费用中位数为3.98(1.87,8.83)万元。2年内发生脓毒症100例以上的科室为中心重症监护病房(ICU),儿科,肾脏科,急诊医学部,急诊重症监护病房(EICU),感染科,呼吸内科,血液科,新生儿监护病房和急诊外科。共有1210例(33.91%)入住ICU(包括中央ICU和EICU)。ICU患者住院费用较高[6.7(3.1、15.5)万元],住院时间较长[9(3,17)天],死亡率较高[35.29%(427/1210)]。在3568例脓毒症患者中,住院期间死亡448人,存活3120人。年龄,死亡组败血症患者的男性比例和住院费用明显高于存活组[年龄(岁):75(60,86)vs.57(30,71),男性比例:67.86%(304/448)59.07%(1843/3120),住院费用(万元):6.7(3.0,16.9)vs.3.7(1.8,8.1)],糖尿病的比率明显低于生存组[4.91%(22/448)。10.45%(326/3120)],住院时间短于生存组[天数:10.0(3.0,19.0)vs.13.0(8.0,24.0)],差异均有统计学意义(均P<0.01)。多因素Logistic回归分析显示,男性[比值比(OR)=0.75,95%置信区间(95CI)为0.59-0.96],老年(OR=1.04,95CI为1.03~1.05)和糖尿病(OR=0.32,95CI为0.19~0.54)是脓毒症患者院内死亡的独立危险因素(均P<0.05)。
    结论:脓毒症在中国西南地区是一个沉重的负担,尤其是ICU,死亡率高,高昂的住院费用,给患者和社会带来沉重的经济负担。男性,老年和糖尿病是脓毒症患者院内死亡的独立危险因素。
    OBJECTIVE: To analyze the epidemiological characteristics of hospitalized patients diagnosed with sepsis in a large class III general hospital in Southwest China in a period of 2 years, and to explore the risk factors related to death in patients with sepsis.
    METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted to select patients with sepsis admitted to Sichuan Provincial People\'s Hospital from September 1, 2021 to August 31, 2023, and general characteristics such as gender, age, discharge diagnosis, discharge department, hospitalization cost, length of stay, and prognosis during hospitalization were collected. The baseline of two groups of patients was compared, and the risk factors of in-hospital cause of death in patients with sepsis were analyzed by multivariate Logistic regression.
    RESULTS: A total of 3 568 patients with sepsis were included with median age of 58 (35, 74) years old. Of all patients, there were 2 147 males (60.17%). The median length of hospitalization was 13 (8, 24) days, and the median hospitalization cost was 3.98 (1.87, 8.83) ten thousand yuan. The departments with more than 100 cases of sepsis in 2 years were central intensive care unit (ICU), pediatrics department, nephrology department, emergency medicine department, emergency intensive care unit (EICU), infectious department, respiratory medicine department, hematology department, neonatal care unit and emergency surgical department. A total of 1 210 patients (33.91%) admitted to ICU (including central ICU and EICU). The hospitalization cost of ICU patients were higher [6.7 (3.1, 15.5) ten thousand yuan], the hospitalization duration was longer [9 (3, 17) days], and the mortality was higher [35.29% (427/1 210)]. Among 3 568 patients with sepsis, 448 died and 3 120 survived during hospitalization. The age, male proportion and hospitalization cost of patients with sepsis in the death group were significantly higher than those in the survival group [age (years old): 75 (60, 86) vs. 57 (30, 71), male proportion: 67.86% (304/448) vs. 59.07% (1 843/3 120), hospitalization cost (ten thousand yuan): 6.7 (3.0, 16.9) vs. 3.7 (1.8, 8.1)], the ratio of diabetes mellitus was significantly lower than that of survival group [4.91% (22/448) vs. 10.45% (326/3 120)], the length of hospitalization was shorter than that of survival group [days: 10.0 (3.0, 19.0) vs. 13.0 (8.0, 24.0)], the differences were statistically significant (all P < 0.01). Multivariate Logistic regression analysis showed that male [odds ratio (OR) = 0.75, 95% confidence interval (95%CI) was 0.59-0.96], elder (OR = 1.04, 95%CI was 1.03-1.05) and diabetes (OR = 0.32, 95%CI was 0.19-0.54) were independent risk factors for in-hospital death in patients with sepsis (all P < 0.05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Sepsis is a heavy burden in Southwest China, especially for ICU, with high mortality, high hospitalization costs, and heavy economic burden on patients and society. Male, elder and diabetes were independent risk factors for in-hospital death of sepsis patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    烧伤是一种普遍的非故意伤害形式,在发展中国家是一个重大的公共卫生问题。我们旨在调查中国东部主要中心成年烧伤患者的流行病学和临床特征。
    这项为期6年的回顾性研究分析了2017年1月至2022年12月在苏州烧伤与创伤中心发生不同程度烧伤的患者。这项研究提取了人口学,临床,和来自电子病历的流行病学数据进行分析。
    该研究包括3,258名成年患者,其中64.3%为男性。最大年龄组影响30-59岁的成年人(63.04%)。烫伤是烧伤的主要原因(1,346,41.31%),其次是火焰(1,271,39.01%)。大多数烧伤住院患者为中度烧伤患者(1791,54.97%)。发病率低,为0.68%,虽然死亡率与年龄密切相关,病因学,和身体总表面积。某些类型烧伤的患者,比如爆炸,热挤压伤,电烧伤有更多的手术,住院时间更长,与烫伤和火焰伤相比,成本更高。
    应根据不同的病因制定不同的预防策略,年龄,和性别。
    UNASSIGNED: Burns are a prevalent form of unintentional injury and a significant public health concern in developing countries. We aimed to investigate the epidemiological and clinical characteristics of adult burn patients at a major center in Eastern China.
    UNASSIGNED: This 6-year retrospective study analyzed patients with varying degrees of burns between January 2017 and December 2022 at the Suzhou Burns and Trauma Center. The study extracted demographic, clinical, and epidemiological data from electronic medical records for analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: The study included 3,258 adult patients, of which 64.3% were male. The largest age group affected 30-59-year-old adults (63.04%). Scalds were the leading cause of burns (1,346, 41.31%), followed by flames (1,271, 39.01%). The majority of burn hospitalizations were those with moderate burns (1791, 54.97%). The morbidity rate was low at 0.68%, while mortality was strongly associated with age, etiology, and total body surface area. Patients with certain types of burns, such as explosions, hot crush injuries, and electric burns had more operations, longer lengths of hospital stay, and higher costs compared to those with scalds and flame injuries.
    UNASSIGNED: Different prevention strategies should be formulated according to different etiologies, ages, and genders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    联合治疗与2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者的药物相互作用(DDI)风险增加相关。本研究旨在调查潜在DDI(PDDI)的流行病学,包括潜在的化学药物相互作用(pCDIs)和潜在的草药-药物相互作用(pHDIs),并对这些患者pDDIs的影响因素进行分类。
    在2019年的12个月期间,对18岁以上的T2DM住院患者中pDDIs的流行病学进行了回顾性研究。用C(监测治疗)鉴定PDDI,D(考虑治疗修改),和X(避免组合)风险评级。采用二元Logistic回归分析pDDI的危险因素。
    在住院期间,共从737名T2DM住院患者中发现6796名pDDIs,0.87%被列为X风险评级,13.39%为D级风险评级。此外,1753pDDIs在出院后被确认,0.11%为X,25.73%为D风险评级。药物-药物关联网络显示大多数pCDI与心血管系统药物相关。氯苯那敏-氯化钾和丹参-华法林是住院期间最普遍的pCDIs和pHDIs相互作用对,评分为X。多变量分析表明,在接受超过8种药物治疗的T2DM患者中,发生超过4pDDI的可能性明显更高。出院后pDDIs的存在与T2DM的并发症和出院药物的数量密切相关。
    T2DM患者经常暴露于pDDIs,包括pCDI和pHDI,住院期间和出院后。多药联合用药是pDDIs的主要危险因素。加强对DDI的监测和预警等策略,增加临床药理经验,以及制定普遍适用的pDDIs临床指南可能有助于降低潜在有害药物组合的发生率。
    UNASSIGNED: Combination therapy was associated with an increased risk of drug- drug interactions (DDIs) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). The present study aimed to investigate the epidemiology of potential DDIs (pDDIs), including potential chemical drug-drug interactions (pCDIs) and potential herb-drug interactions (pHDIs), and classify the influencing factors of pDDIs in these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study of the epidemiology of pDDIs among T2DM hospitalized patients older than 18 years and treated with at least two drugs during hospitalization was conducted over a 12-month period in 2019. PDDIs were identified with C (monitor therapy), D (consider therapy modification), and X (avoid combination) risk ratings. Binary logistic regression was used to analyze the risk factors of pDDIs.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 6796 pDDIs were identified from 737 T2DM hospitalized patients during hospitalization, with 0.87% classified as X risk rating, 13.39% as D risk rating. Additionally, 1753 pDDIs were identified after discharge, with 0.11% as X and 25.73% as D risk rating. The drug-drug association networks showed that the majority of pCDIs were associated with cardiovascular system drugs. Chlorphenamine-potassium chloride and danshen-warfarin were the most prevalent interacting pairs of pCDIs and pHDIs with X rating during hospitalization. Multivariate analysis indicated that the likelihood of developing over 4 pDDIs was significantly higher among T2DM patients who had received over 8 medications. The presence of pDDIs after discharge was strongly associated with the complications of T2DM and the number of discharge medications.
    UNASSIGNED: T2DM patients were frequently exposed to pDDIs, including pCDIs and pHDIs, both during hospitalization and after discharge. Multi-drug combination was the primary risk factor for pDDIs. Strategies such as enhancing the monitoring and warning for pDDIs, increasing clinical pharmacological experience, as well as developing universally applicable clinical guidelines for pDDIs may be beneficial in reducing the incidence of potentially harmful drug-combinations.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:风湿性疾病的影响,长期用药,疫苗接种对COVID-19的严重程度仍未得到充分理解,阻碍有效的病人管理。本研究旨在调查影响中国风湿性疾病患者COVID-19严重程度的因素,并为患者护理提供现实证据。
    方法:我们进行了一项由两个队列组成的回顾性观察研究,然后是嵌套的案例控制分析。门诊队列包括非重症COVID-19患者,而住院队列包括连续的重症COVID-19住院患者。此外,来自两个队列的风湿性疾病患者被纳入巢式病例对照研究.从电子病历和调查中获得临床信息。
    结果:共纳入749名门诊患者和167名住院患者。在门诊队列中,风湿性疾病被确定为呼吸困难严重程度的危险因素(无风湿性疾病:OR=0.577,95%CI=0.396-0.841,p=.004),但不是为了死亡率,住院时间,或住院队列中的住院费用。长期使用糖皮质激素被确定为风湿性疾病患者呼吸困难严重程度的独立危险因素(OR=1.814,95%CI=1.235-2.663,p=0.002),而疫苗接种和免疫抑制剂治疗没有相关性。接种疫苗被确定为风湿性疾病患者因COVID-19导致住院的保护因素(OR=0.031,95%CI=0.007-0.136,p<.001),而长期糖皮质激素和免疫抑制剂治疗没有相关性。
    结论:风湿性疾病和长期使用糖皮质激素是中国人群COVID-19严重程度的重要危险因素,而强调疫苗对COVID-19严重程度的保护作用是至关重要的。此外,这项研究为长期免疫抑制剂治疗不一定需要额外调整处方这一概念提供了初步支持.
    OBJECTIVE: The impact of rheumatic diseases, long-term medication, and vaccination on COVID-19 severity remain insufficiently understood, hindering effective patient management. This study aims to investigate factors influencing COVID-19 severity in Chinese rheumatic patients and to provide real-world evidence for patient care.
    METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational study consisting of two cohorts, followed by a nested case-control analysis. The outpatient cohort included non-severe COVID-19 patients, while the inpatient cohort included consecutive severe COVID-19 inpatients. Additionally, rheumatic patients from both cohorts were included for the nested case-control study. Clinical information was obtained from electronic medical records and surveys.
    RESULTS: A total of 749 outpatients and 167 inpatients were enrolled. In the outpatient cohort, rheumatic diseases were identified as a risk factor for the severity of dyspnea (No rheumatic disease: OR = 0.577, 95% CI = 0.396-0.841, p = .004), but not for mortality, length of hospitalization, or hospitalization costs in the inpatient cohort. Long-term glucocorticoids use was identified as an independent risk factor for severity of dyspnea in rheumatic patients (OR = 1.814, 95% CI = 1.235-2.663, p = .002), while vaccination and immunosuppressant treatment showed no association. Vaccination was identified as a protective factor against hospitalization due to COVID-19 in patients with rheumatic diseases (OR = 0.031, 95% CI = 0.007-0.136, p < .001), whereas long-term glucocorticoids and immunosuppressant treatment showed no association.
    CONCLUSIONS: Rheumatic diseases and long-term glucocorticoids use are significant risk factors for COVID-19 severity in the Chinese population, whereas emphasizing the protective effects of vaccines against COVID-19 severity is crucial. Additionally, the investigation provides preliminary support for the concept that long-term immunosuppressant therapy does not necessarily require additional prescription adjustments.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在COVID-19大流行期间,武汉发生了严重的封锁,随后是大流行后的缓解阶段。本研究分析武汉市非COVID-19下呼吸道感染(LRTI)住院患者呼吸道病原菌的细菌和真菌谱,以确定不同年龄段和医院科室的病原菌分布。
    结果:我们收集了2019年至2021年间非COVID-19LRTI住院患者病历中病原体检测的报告。使用16S和内部转录间隔区测序方法对支气管肺泡灌洗液样品进行了细菌和真菌病原体的测试。该研究包括1368例病例。最常见的细菌是肺炎链球菌(12.50%)和肺炎支原体(8.33%)。最常见的真菌是烟曲霉(2.49%)和肺孢子虫(1.75%)。与2019年相比,2021年肺炎链球菌检出率显著提高,肺炎支原体检出率下降。肺炎链球菌主要在儿童中检出。与呼吸内科相比,呼吸重症监护病房几乎所有真菌的检出率都更高。肺炎链球菌和肺炎支原体在儿科更常见。
    结论:在COVID-19爆发之前和之后,在武汉的非COVID-19患者中检测到常见病原体谱的变化,最大的变化发生在儿童中。主要病原体因患者年龄和医院科室而异。
    OBJECTIVE: A severe lockdown occurred in Wuhan during the COVID-19 pandemic, followed by a remission phase in the pandemic\'s aftermath. This study analyzed the bacterial and fungal profiles of respiratory pathogens in patients hospitalized with non-COVID-19 lower respiratory tract infections (LRTIs) during this period to determine the pathogen profile distributions in different age groups and hospital departments in Wuhan.
    RESULTS: We collected reports of pathogen testing in the medical records of patients hospitalized with non-COVID-19 LRTI between 2019 and 2021. These cases were tested for bacterial and fungal pathogens using 16S and internal transcribed spacer sequencing methods on bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples. The study included 1368 cases. The bacteria most commonly identified were Streptococcus pneumoniae (12.50%) and Mycoplasma pneumoniae (8.33%). The most commonly identified fungi were Aspergillus fumigatus (2.49%) and Pneumocystis jirovecii (1.75%). Compared to 2019, the S. pneumoniae detection rates increased significantly in 2021, and those of M. pneumoniae decreased. Streptococcus pneumoniae was detected mainly in children. The detection rates of almost all fungi were greater in the respiratory Intensive Care Unit compared to respiratory medicine. Streptococcus pneumoniae and M. pneumoniae were detected more frequently in the pediatric department.
    CONCLUSIONS: Before and after the COVID-19 outbreak, a change in the common pathogen spectrum was detected in patients with non-COVID-19 in Wuhan, with the greatest change occurring among children. The major pathogens varied by the patient\'s age and the hospital department.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号