hospitalization

住院
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先前的一项研究报告,由于法国COVID-19病例的资源优先排序导致手术护理中断,非COVID-19患者的死亡率明显过高。主要目的是调查是否对医疗状况产生类似的影响,并确定在法国大流行的第一年,医院饱和度对非COVID-19医院死亡率的影响。
    方法:我们在2020年3月1日至5月31日期间在法国进行了一项基于人群的全国性队列研究,纳入了所有因非COVID-19急性疾病住院的成年患者。2020年(第1波)和2020年9月1日和2020年12月31日(第2波)。根据COVID-19每周的床位占用情况,医院饱和度分为四个级别:无饱和度(<5%),低饱和度(>5%和≤15%),中等饱和度(>15%和≤30%),和高饱和度(>30%)。多元广义线性模型分析了医院饱和度与死亡率之间的关系,并调整了年龄,性别,COVID-19波,Charlson合并症指数,案例混合,入院来源,入住ICU,医院类别和居住地。
    结果:共有2,264,871名成年患者因急性疾病住院。在多变量分析中,低饱和医院的医院死亡率明显更高(调整后的赔率/aOR=1.05,95%CI[1.34-1.07],P<.001),中度饱和医院(aOR=1.12,95%CI[1.09-1.14],P<.001),和高度饱和的医院(aOR=1.25,95%CI[1.21-1.30],P<.001)与非饱和医院相比。在高度饱和的医院中,ICU以外的死亡比例较高(87%),低或中等饱和医院(81-84%)。医院饱和对死亡率的负面影响在65岁以上的患者中更为明显,合并症较少的人(Charlson1-2和3vs.0),癌症患者,神经和精神疾病,那些从家里或通过急诊室入院的人(与从其他医院病房转院的人相比),和那些没有进入重症监护室的人。
    结论:我们的研究揭示了值得注意的“剂量效应”关系:随着医院饱和度的增加,非COVID-19医院死亡风险也增加。这些结果引起了人们对医院韧性和患者安全的担忧,强调确定有针对性的战略以增强未来弹性的重要性,特别是高危患者。
    BACKGROUND: A previous study reported significant excess mortality among non-COVID-19 patients due to disrupted surgical care caused by resource prioritization for COVID-19 cases in France. The primary objective was to investigate if a similar impact occurred for medical conditions and determine the effect of hospital saturation on non-COVID-19 hospital mortality during the first year of the pandemic in France.
    METHODS: We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study including all adult patients hospitalized for non-COVID-19 acute medical conditions in France between March 1, 2020 and 31 May, 2020 (1st wave) and September 1, 2020 and December 31, 2020 (2nd wave). Hospital saturation was categorized into four levels based on weekly bed occupancy for COVID-19: no saturation (< 5%), low saturation (> 5% and ≤ 15%), moderate saturation (> 15% and ≤ 30%), and high saturation (> 30%). Multivariate generalized linear model analyzed the association between hospital saturation and mortality with adjustment for age, sex, COVID-19 wave, Charlson Comorbidity Index, case-mix, source of hospital admission, ICU admission, category of hospital and region of residence.
    RESULTS: A total of 2,264,871 adult patients were hospitalized for acute medical conditions. In the multivariate analysis, the hospital mortality was significantly higher in low saturated hospitals (adjusted Odds Ratio/aOR = 1.05, 95% CI [1.34-1.07], P < .001), moderate saturated hospitals (aOR = 1.12, 95% CI [1.09-1.14], P < .001), and highly saturated hospitals (aOR = 1.25, 95% CI [1.21-1.30], P < .001) compared to non-saturated hospitals. The proportion of deaths outside ICU was higher in highly saturated hospitals (87%) compared to non-, low- or moderate saturated hospitals (81-84%). The negative impact of hospital saturation on mortality was more pronounced in patients older than 65 years, those with fewer comorbidities (Charlson 1-2 and 3 vs. 0), patients with cancer, nervous and mental diseases, those admitted from home or through the emergency room (compared to transfers from other hospital wards), and those not admitted to the intensive care unit.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study reveals a noteworthy \"dose-effect\" relationship: as hospital saturation intensifies, the non-COVID-19 hospital mortality risk also increases. These results raise concerns regarding hospitals\' resilience and patient safety, underscoring the importance of identifying targeted strategies to enhance resilience for the future, particularly for high-risk patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:射血分数保留或轻度降低的心力衰竭(HF)包括异质组患者。将其重新分类为不同的表型群,以实现有针对性的干预是一个优先事项。这项研究旨在识别不同的表型,并比较表型群特征和结果,来自电子健康记录数据。
    方法:从NIHR健康信息学协作数据库中确定了英国五家医院收治的诊断为HF且左心室射血分数≥40%的2,187例患者。基于分区,基于模型,并应用了基于密度的机器学习聚类技术。Cox比例风险和Fine-Gray竞争风险模型用于比较不同表型组的结果(全因死亡率和HF住院率)。
    结果:确定了三个表型:(1)年轻,主要是心脏代谢和冠状动脉疾病患病率高的女性患者;(2)更虚弱的患者,肺部疾病和心房颤动发生率较高;(3)以全身性炎症和糖尿病及肾功能障碍发生率较高的患者。生存概况是不同的,表型组1至3的全因死亡风险增加(p<0.001)。与传统因素相比,表型组成员显著提高了生存预测。表型群不能预测HF的住院治疗。
    结论:将无监督机器学习应用于常规收集的电子健康记录数据,确定了具有不同临床特征和独特生存概况的表型群。
    BACKGROUND: Heart failure (HF) with preserved or mildly reduced ejection fraction includes a heterogenous group of patients. Reclassification into distinct phenogroups to enable targeted interventions is a priority. This study aimed to identify distinct phenogroups, and compare phenogroup characteristics and outcomes, from electronic health record data.
    METHODS: 2,187 patients admitted to five UK hospitals with a diagnosis of HF and a left ventricular ejection fraction ≥ 40% were identified from the NIHR Health Informatics Collaborative database. Partition-based, model-based, and density-based machine learning clustering techniques were applied. Cox Proportional Hazards and Fine-Gray competing risks models were used to compare outcomes (all-cause mortality and hospitalisation for HF) across phenogroups.
    RESULTS: Three phenogroups were identified: (1) Younger, predominantly female patients with high prevalence of cardiometabolic and coronary disease; (2) More frail patients, with higher rates of lung disease and atrial fibrillation; (3) Patients characterised by systemic inflammation and high rates of diabetes and renal dysfunction. Survival profiles were distinct, with an increasing risk of all-cause mortality from phenogroups 1 to 3 (p < 0.001). Phenogroup membership significantly improved survival prediction compared to conventional factors. Phenogroups were not predictive of hospitalisation for HF.
    CONCLUSIONS: Applying unsupervised machine learning to routinely collected electronic health record data identified phenogroups with distinct clinical characteristics and unique survival profiles.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:卒中相关性肺炎(SAP)和消化道出血(GIB)是卒中后常见的内科并发症。先前的研究表明,卒中后SAP和GIB之间存在很强的相关性。然而,对SAP和GIB的时间顺序知之甚少。在本研究中,我们旨在验证缺血性卒中后SAP和GIB的相关性并阐明其时间顺序.
    方法:对缺血性卒中患者急性卒中后院内内科并发症的研究进行分析。收集住院期间SAP和GIB发生的数据以及从中风发作到SAP和GIB诊断的间隔。采用多因素logistic回归分析SAP与GIB的相关性。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较从中风发作到SAP和GIB诊断的时间间隔。
    结果:共纳入1129例缺血性卒中患者。平均住院时间为14天。总的来说,86例患者(7.6%;95%CI,6.1-9.2%)在住院期间发生SAP,47例患者(4.3%;95%CI,3.0-5.3%)发生GIB。在调整了潜在的混杂因素后,SAP与缺血性卒中后GIB的发生密切相关(OR=5.13;95%CI,2.02~13.00;P<0.001)。缺血性卒中后从卒中发作到SAP诊断的中位时间短于GIB(4天vs.5天;P=0.039)。
    结论:SAP与缺血性卒中后GIB相关,SAP的发病时间早于GIB。SAP卒中患者采取预防措施预防GIB势在必行。
    BACKGROUND: Stroke-associated pneumonia (SAP) and gastrointestinal bleeding (GIB) are common medical complications after stroke. The previous study suggested a strong association between SAP and GIB after stroke. However, little is known about the time sequence of SAP and GIB. In the present study, we aimed to verify the association and clarify the temporal sequence of SAP and GIB after ischemic stroke.
    METHODS: Patients with ischemic stroke from in-hospital Medical Complication after Acute Stroke study were analyzed. Data on occurrences of SAP and GIB during hospitalization and the intervals from stroke onset to diagnosis of SAP and GIB were collected. Multiple logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between SAP and GIB. Kruskal-Wallis test was used to compare the time intervals from stroke onset to diagnosis of SAP and GIB.
    RESULTS: A total of 1129 patients with ischemic stroke were included. The median length of hospitalization was 14 days. Overall, 86 patients (7.6%; 95% CI, 6.1-9.2%) developed SAP and 47 patients (4.3%; 95% CI, 3.0-5.3%) developed GIB during hospitalization. After adjusting potential confounders, SAP was significantly associated with the development of GIB after ischemic stroke (OR = 5.13; 95% CI, 2.02-13.00; P < 0.001). The median time from stroke onset to diagnosis of SAP was shorter than that of GIB after ischemic stroke (4 days vs. 5 days; P = 0.039).
    CONCLUSIONS: SAP was associated with GIB after ischemic stroke, and the onset time of SAP was earlier than that of GIB. It is imperative to take precautions to prevent GIB in stroke patients with SAP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    鉴于癌症相关静脉血栓形成(CAT)患者从低分子量肝素(LMWH)转换为直接口服抗凝药(DOAC)的有效性和安全性存在不确定性,我们利用香港的电子健康数据库进行了一项全面的基于人群的队列研究.2010年至2022年共纳入4356例CAT患者,1700例(39.0%)患者改用DOAC治疗。与连续LMWH处理相比,转用DOAC与静脉血栓栓塞(HR:0.49[95%CI=0.35-0.68])和全因死亡率(HR:0.67[95%CI=0.61-0.74])显著降低住院风险相关,6个月内大出血无显著差异(HR:1.04[95%CI=0.83-1.31])。这些发现为CAT患者从LMWH转换为DOAC的有效性和安全性提供了保证。包括弱势患者群体。
    Given the existing uncertainty regarding the effectiveness and safety of switching from low-molecular-weight heparin (LMWH) to direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in patients with cancer-associated venous thrombosis (CAT), we conducted a comprehensive population-based cohort study utilizing electronic health database in Hong Kong. A total of 4356 patients with CAT between 2010 and 2022 were included, with 1700 (39.0%) patients switching to DOAC treatment. Compared to continuous LMWH treatment, switching to DOACs was associated with a significantly lower risk of hospitalization due to venous thromboembolism (HR: 0.49 [95% CI = 0.35-0.68]) and all-cause mortality (HR: 0.67 [95% CI = 0.61-0.74]), with no significant difference in major bleeding (HR: 1.04 [95% CI = 0.83-1.31]) within six months. These findings provide reassurance regarding the effectiveness and safety of switching from LMWH to DOACs among patients with CAT, including vulnerable patient groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:蜂窝织炎是皮肤相关住院的最常见原因,脓毒症患者的死亡率仍然很高。已经开发了一些分层模型,但他们在外部验证中的表现并不令人满意。这项研究旨在开发和比较不同的模型,以预测住院期间蜂窝织炎患者发生败血症。
    方法:这是一项回顾性队列研究。
    方法:本研究包括国际上两个独立的大型队列的开发和外部验证阶段。
    方法:使用重症监护医学信息集市(MIMIC)-IV数据库中的6695例蜂窝织炎患者,使用不同的机器学习算法开发模型。从我们大学的YiduCloud数据库中选择最佳模型,然后在2506例蜂窝织炎患者中进行外部验证。在外部验证组中,通过曲线下面积(AUC)进一步比较所选模型的性能和鲁棒性,诊断准确性,灵敏度,特异性和诊断OR。
    方法:本研究的主要结果是基于住院期间脓毒症-3.0标准的发展。
    结果:两组患者特征有显著差异。在内部验证中,XGBoost是最好的模型,AUC为0.780,AdaBoost是最差的型号,AUC为0.585。在外部验证中,人工神经网络(ANN)模型的AUC最高,0.830,而逻辑回归(LR)模型的AUC最低,0.792.删除变量时,增强和ANN模型中的AUC值变化小于LR模型中的AUC值变化。
    结论:Boosting和神经网络模型的性能略好于LR模型,并且在复杂的临床情况下更加稳健。结果可以为临床医生提供一种工具,以检测早期发展为败血症的蜂窝织炎住院患者。
    OBJECTIVE: Cellulitis is the most common cause of skin-related hospitalisations, and the mortality of patients with sepsis remains high. Some stratification models have been developed, but their performance in external validation has been unsatisfactory. This study was designed to develop and compare different models for predicting patients with cellulitis developing sepsis during hospitalisation.
    METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study.
    METHODS: This study included both the development and the external-validation phases from two independent large cohorts internationally.
    METHODS: A total of 6695 patients with cellulitis in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive care (MIMIC)-IV database were used to develop models with different machine-learning algorithms. The best models were selected and then externally validated in 2506 patients with cellulitis from the YiduCloud database of our university. The performances and robustness of selected models were further compared in the external-validation group by area under the curve (AUC), diagnostic accuracy, sensitivity, specificity and diagnostic OR.
    METHODS: The primary outcome of interest in this study was the development based on the Sepsis-3.0 criteria during hospitalisation.
    RESULTS: Patient characteristics were significantly different between the two groups. In internal validation, XGBoost was the best model, with an AUC of 0.780, and AdaBoost was the worst model, with an AUC of 0.585. In external validation, the AUC of the artificial neural network (ANN) model was the highest, 0.830, while the AUC of the logistic regression (LR) model was the lowest, 0.792. The AUC values changed less in the boosting and ANN models than in the LR model when variables were deleted.
    CONCLUSIONS: Boosting and neural network models performed slightly better than the LR model and were more robust in complex clinical situations. The results could provide a tool for clinicians to detect hospitalised patients with cellulitis developing sepsis early.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:外周动脉疾病(PAD)不仅与急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)的反复住院有关,而且与慢性肾脏病(CKD)有关。导致心力衰竭结局恶化的已知风险因素。CKD与PAD在放电后ADHF结果中的相互作用尚不清楚。
    方法:自2005年以来,通过社区动脉粥样硬化风险(ARIC)研究,对美国4个地区的ADHF住院患者进行了采样,并通过医师审查进行了分类。我们检查了PAD与1年ADHF再入院的校正关联,在有和无CKD的患者中(定义为肾小球滤过率[GFR]≤60mL/min/1.73m2[阶段3a或更差])。
    结果:从2005年到2018年,ADHF患者的住院指数为1049(平均年龄77岁,66%白色)与肌酐数据,那些活着出院的人。其中,155(15%)患有PAD,66%患有CKD。与那些没有PAD的人相比,PAD患者有更多的合并症和更高的1年ADHF再入院率,无论CKD状态如何。调整后,PAD与1年ADHF再入院的更大风险相关,两者都适用于合并CKD的患者(HR,1.70;95%CI:1.29-2.24)和无CKD的(HR,1.97;95%CI:1.14-3.40);p-交互作用=0.8。
    结论:在ADHF住院患者中,并发PAD的患者心血管合并症更普遍,1年ADHF再入院的可能性更高,无论CKD状态如何。在合并心力衰竭患者的管理中整合更全面的方法,PAD和CKD可能是改善这一脆弱人群预后的重要策略。
    OBJECTIVE: Peripheral artery disease (PAD) has not only been associated with recurrent hospitalization for acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) but is also associated with chronic kidney disease (CKD), a known risk factor for worse heart failure outcomes. The interaction of CKD with PAD in post-discharge ADHF outcomes is not well known.
    METHODS: Since 2005, hospitalizations for ADHF were sampled from 4 US regions by the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) study and classified by physician review. We examined the adjusted association of PAD with 1-year ADHF readmissions, in patients with and without CKD (defined by glomerular filtration rate [GFR] ≤60 mL/min/1.73 m2 [stage 3a or worse]).
    RESULTS: From 2005 to 2018, there were 1049 index hospitalizations for patients with ADHF (mean age 77 years, 66 % white) with creatinine data, who were discharged alive. Of these, 155 (15 %) had PAD and 66 % had CKD. In comparison to those without PAD, patients with PAD had more comorbid conditions and higher 1-year ADHF readmission rates, irrespective of CKD status. After adjustment, PAD was associated with a greater risk of 1-year ADHF readmissions, both for patients with concomitant CKD (HR, 1.70; 95 % CI: 1.29-2.24) and those without CKD (HR, 1.97; 95 % CI: 1.14-3.40); p-interaction = 0.8.
    CONCLUSIONS: Among patients hospitalized with ADHF, those with concurrent PAD have more prevalent cardiovascular comorbidities and higher likelihood of 1-year ADHF readmission, irrespective of CKD status. Integrating a more holistic approach in management of patients with concomitant heart failure, PAD and CKD may be an important strategy to improve the prognosis in this vulnerable population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究分析和总结了评估工具,目前的情况,静脉血栓栓塞症(VTE)预防知识的影响因素,态度,和实践(KAP)在患者中。本研究旨在为制定有针对性的健康教育计划和干预策略提供参考依据,以提高患者预防VTE的知识和信念。本研究旨在提高VTE预防措施的执行率,最终降低VTE的发生率。目前的研究发现,影响知识的因素,态度,住院患者VTE预防的实践包括人口统计学因素(年龄,性别,教育水平,职业),疾病相关因素(治疗阶段,损伤部位,andwards),和其他因素(接受VTE相关知识教育并在家中有医务人员)。
    This study analyzes and summarizes the assessment tools, current situation, and influencing factors of venous thromboembolism (VTE) prevention knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAP) among patients. This study aimed to provide a reference basis for developing targeted health education plans and intervention strategies for patients to improve their knowledge and beliefs concerning VTE prevention. This study aimed to increase the implementation rate of VTE prevention measures and ultimately reduce the incidence of VTE.The current studies found that the factors influencing knowledge, attitude, and practice of VTE prevention in hospitalized patients include demographic factors (age, sex, education level, occupation), disease-related factors (treatment stage, injury site, and wards), and other factors (receiving VTE-related knowledge education and having medical workers at home).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人们对使用以过程为中心的指标评估韩国糖尿病护理质量的有效性提出了担忧。本研究旨在检查影响常规HbA1c检测性能的因素,并探讨其与健康结果的关系。包括住院和死亡率。我们采用回顾性队列设计,随访4年,涉及159,452名新诊断为2型糖尿病的成年患者(国际疾病分类中的E11,第10版)在2011年。我们通过合并韩国国民健康保险(KNHI)索赔数据库和韩国KNHI资格数据库,建立了国家人口数据库。在前3年中,每年至少接受一次常规HbA1c检测的糖尿病患者比例为33.8%。相比之下,在同一时期未接受常规检查的患者住院几率显着增加(糖尿病/CVD/肾脏,OR,1.23,95%CI,1.12-1.34;糖尿病,OR,1.36,95%CI,1.17-1.57)。此外,该非患者组的死亡风险较高(OR:1.56,95%CI:1.36~1.80).这项研究支持定期HbA1c检测对2型糖尿病患者健康结果的积极影响。为了提高目前33%的常规HbA1c检测率,制定患者定制管理政策至关重要。应优先考虑65岁或以上的糖尿病患者,生活在农村地区,和那些属于低收入家庭(医疗援助)。
    Concerns have been raised about the effectiveness of using process-centered indicators to assess the quality of diabetes care in Korea. This study aims to examine the factors influencing the performance of regular HbA1c testing and to explore its association with health outcomes, including hospitalization and mortality. We utilized a retrospective cohort design with a 4-year follow-up period, involving 159,452 adult patients newly diagnosed with type 2 diabetes (E11 in International Classification of Diseases, 10th Edition) in 2011. We established a national population database by merging the Korea National Health Insurance (KNHI) claims database and the KNHI Qualification Database of South Korea. The proportion of diabetic patients who underwent regular HbA1c testing at least once a year in the first 3 years was determined to be 33.8%. In comparison, patients who did not receive regular tests during the same period exhibited significantly increased odds of hospitalization (diabetes/CVD/renal, OR, 1.23, 95% CI, 1.12-1.34; diabetes, OR, 1.36, 95% CI, 1.17-1.57). Additionally, this nonpatient group experienced a higher risk of mortality (OR: 1.56, 95% CI: 1.36-1.80). This study supports the positive impact of regular HbA1c testing on health outcomes for individuals with type 2 diabetes. To increase the current 33% rate of regular HbA1c testing, developing patient-customized management policies is essential. Priority should be given to diabetic patients aged 65 or older, living in rural areas, and those belonging to low-income families (medical aid).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    调查过去20年澳大利亚眼病和附件疾病的住院趋势。这是一项关于人口水平的描述性生态研究,检查了澳大利亚1998年至2021年期间的住院数据。住院数据从国家医院发病率数据库中提取。卡方检验用于评估1998年至2021年之间的入院率差异。眼和附件疾病的住院率增加了1.20倍(从1998年的852.32[95%置信区间[CI]848.16-856.47]到2021年的1873.72[95%CI1868.48-1878.96]每100,000人,P<.01)。眼睛和附件疾病住院的最常见原因是晶状体疾病(65.7%),其次是脉络膜和视网膜疾病(15.6%),其次是眼睑疾病,泪道系统,和轨道(7.7%)。男性的住院率增加了1.25倍(从1998年的737.67[95%CI732.18-743.16]到2021年的1657.19[95%CI1650.19-1664.20],每100,000人)。女性的入院率急剧增加1.03倍(从1998年的965.37[95%CI959.14-971.59]到2021年的1964.35[95%CI1956.80-1971.90],每100,000人)。在与眼睛和附件疾病相关的入院流行病学中,有明确的性别和年龄角色。晶状体疾病是住院的最常见原因。在过去的几十年中,入学率的增加可能是由于预期寿命的增加,生活方式的改变,以及筛查方案的改进。
    To investigate the trends of hospital admissions concerning diseases of the eye and adnexa in Australia in the past 2 decades. This is a descriptive ecological study on the population level that examined hospitalization data for the duration between 1998 and 2021 in Australia. Hospitalization data were extracted from the National Hospital Morbidity Database. The chi-squared test was utilized to assess the difference in admission rates between the years 1998 and 2021. Hospital admission rate for diseases of the eye and adnexa increased by 1.20-fold (from 852.32 [95% confidence interval [CI] 848.16-856.47] in 1998 to 1873.72 [95% CI 1868.48-1878.96] in 2021 per 100,000 persons, P < .01). The most common cause of hospitalization for diseases of the eye and adnexa was disorders of the lens (65.7%), followed by disorders of the choroid and retina (15.6%), followed by disorders of the eyelid, lacrimal system, and orbit (7.7%). Hospital admission rate among males increased by 1.25-fold (from 737.67 [95% CI 732.18-743.16] in 1998 to 1657.19 [95% CI 1650.19-1664.20] in 2021 per 100,000 persons). Hospital admission rate among females increased less sharply by 1.03-fold (from 965.37 [95% CI 959.14-971.59] in 1998 to 1964.35 [95% CI 1956.80-1971.90] in 2021 per 100,000 persons). There are clear gender and age roles in the epidemiology of hospital admissions related to eye and adnexa disorders. Lens disorders were the most common cause of hospital admission. The admission rate increase during the past decades could be due to increases in life expectancy, lifestyle changes, and improvements in screening protocols.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:评估参加国家健康保险(NHI)计划的印尼人口在COVID-19医院治疗前后的医院服务利用率和成本。
    方法:将2020年5月至8月期间在医院接受实验室确认的COVID-19治疗的28,159名印度尼西亚NHI患者与2020年从未诊断出COVID-19的8,995名个体进行比较。使用差异差异方法来比较这两组之间每月的全因利用率和医院服务的总索赔。分析包括医院治疗前9个月和住院后3至6个月的时间。
    结果:观察到COVID-19治疗前后医院服务利用率和成本的短期大幅增加。以治疗前第五个月为参考期,与对照组相比,我们观察到COVID-19组治疗前1-3个月和治疗后2-4个月的门诊量增加(p<0.001).我们还发现治疗前1-2个月和治疗后1个月的入院率较高(p<0.001)。因此,在治疗前1-3个日历月和治疗后1-4个日历月观察到住院费用增加(p<0.001).医院资源利用率的提高在40岁以上的人群中更为突出。总的来说,医院门诊量没有大幅增加,招生,以及COVID-19治疗后四个月和治疗前五个月的费用。
    结论:需要住院治疗的COVID-19患者短期内的医疗资源利用率要高得多,治疗前后。这些结果表明,治疗COVID-19患者的总成本可能包括急性期和急性期。
    OBJECTIVE: To estimate hospital services utilisation and cost among the Indonesian population enrolled in the National Health Insurance (NHI) program before and after COVID-19 hospital treatment.
    METHODS: 28,159 Indonesian NHI enrolees treated with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 in hospitals between May and August 2020 were compared to 8,995 individuals never diagnosed with COVID-19 in 2020. A difference-in-difference approach is used to contrast the monthly all-cause utilisation rate and total claims of hospital services between these two groups. A period of nine months before and three to six months after hospital treatment were included in the analysis.
    RESULTS: A substantial short-term increase in hospital services utilisation and cost before and after COVID-19 treatment was observed. Using the fifth month before treatment as the reference period, we observed an increased outpatient visits rate in 1-3 calendar months before and up to 2-4 months after treatment (p<0.001) among the COVID-19 group compared to the comparison group. We also found a higher admissions rate in 1-2 months before and one month after treatment (p<0.001). Consequently, increased hospital costs were observed in 1-3 calendar months before and 1-4 calendar months after the treatment (p<0.001). The elevated hospital resource utilisation was more prominent among individuals older than 40. Overall, no substantial increase in hospital outpatient visits, admissions, and costs beyond four months after and five months before COVID-19 treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with COVID-19 who required hospital treatment had considerably higher healthcare resource utilisation in the short-term, before and after the treatment. These findings indicated that the total cost of treating COVID-19 patients might include the pre- and post-acute period.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号