first episode psychosis

首发精神病
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:先前的荟萃分析表明,早期精神病患者的认知功能稳定发展,通过各种工具进行评估。为了避免与评估相关的异质性,本研究旨在利用MATRICS共识认知电池(MCCB)检测早期精神病患者的纵向认知功能变化.
    方法:Embase,PubMed,和Scopus从成立之初到2023年9月26日进行了系统搜索。纳入标准是纵向研究,提供了首次发作精神病(FEP)和精神病高危人群(UHR)的随访MCCB数据。
    结果:对12项791名参与者(566名FEP患者和225名健康对照)的研究进行了分析。缺乏合适的UHR研究。随着时间的推移,FEP患者和健康对照组的MCCB总分均显著改善.此外,FEP患者在所有MCCB领域表现出改善,虽然健康对照仅在特定领域显示出增强,例如处理速度,注意,工作记忆,推理和解决问题。与健康对照相比,FEP患者的视觉空间学习改善明显更大。亚组分析表明,诊断类型和随访持续时间均不影响FEP患者认知改善的程度。
    结论:除了视觉空间学习之外,FEP和健康对照之间MCCB域的认知改善幅度没有显着差异。这强调了视觉空间学习是精神障碍早期病理状态变化的潜在敏感认知标记。
    BACKGROUND: A previous meta-analysis indicated stable progress in cognitive functions in early psychosis, assessed through various tools. To avoid assessment-related heterogeneity, this study aims to examine the longitudinal cognitive function changes in early psychosis utilizing the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB).
    METHODS: Embase, PubMed, and Scopus were systematically searched from their inception to September 26th 2023. The inclusion criteria were longitudinal studies that presented follow-up MCCB data for individuals experiencing first-episode psychosis (FEP) and those with ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR).
    RESULTS: Twelve studies with 791 participants (566 FEP patients and 225 healthy controls) were subjected to analysis. Suitable UHR studies were absent. Over time, both FEP patients and healthy controls showed significant improvements in MCCB total scores. Furthermore, FEP patients demonstrated improvements across all MCCB domains, while healthy controls only showed augmentations in specific domains such as speed of processing, attention, working memory, and reasoning and problem-solving. Visuospatial learning improvements were significantly greater in FEP patients compared to healthy controls. Subgroup analyses suggested that neither diagnostic type nor follow-up duration influenced the magnitude of cognitive improvement in FEP patients.
    CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of cognitive improvement for MCCB domains was not significantly different between FEP and healthy controls other than visuospatial learning. This underscores visuospatial learning as a potentially sensitive cognitive marker for early pathologic state changes in psychotic disorders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管精神病前驱症状(DPP)的持续时间引起了人们对精神病和服务模式的发展轨迹的关注,基本问题在精神病的维度频谱模型的背景下存在。在Cavan-Monaghan第一集精神病研究的205名具有流行病学代表性的受试者中,DPP被系统地量化和比较,第一次,在所有12个DSM-IV精神病诊断中。还将DPP与未经治疗的精神病(DUP)的持续时间进行了比较,然后分析了三个年龄范围内的病前特征:<12、12-15和16-18岁。对于每个诊断,DPP和DUP的中位数都比均值短,表示常见的右偏分布。DPP和DUP的排名顺序在精神分裂症中最长,其他精神分裂症谱系精神病的中间人,精神病性抑郁症和精神病性障碍未另作说明,和最短的短暂的精神病,双相情感障碍和物质诱发的精神障碍,尽管具有重叠的右偏态分布。除物质诱发的精神障碍外,所有诊断的DPP均长于DUP。在功能性精神病诊断中,通过在16-18岁期间更高的病前智力和更好的病前调整来预测更长的DPP。这些发现表明,跨诊断,DPP和DUP共享右偏连续性,根据精神病的维度频谱模型,并且可能反映出沿着其轨迹在主观阈值处被二分的单一过程。16-18岁时更好的病前功能似乎可以通过延迟向明显的精神病症状的进展而赋予韧性,并且可能构成心理社会干预的特定目标时期。
    While duration of the psychosis prodrome (DPP) attracts attention in relation to the developmental trajectory of psychotic illness and service models, fundamental issues endure in the context of dimensional-spectrum models of psychosis. Among 205 epidemiologically representative subjects in the Cavan-Monaghan First Episode Psychosis Study, DPP was systematically quantified and compared, for the first time, across all 12 DSM-IV psychotic diagnoses. DPP was also compared with duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and each was then analysed in relation to premorbid features across three age ranges: <12, 12-15 and 16-18 years. For each diagnosis, medians for both DPP and DUP were shorter than means, indicating common right-skewed distributions. Rank orders for both DPP and DUP were longest for schizophrenia, intermediate for other schizophrenia-spectrum psychoses, psychotic depression and psychotic disorder not otherwise specified, and shortest for brief psychotic disorder, bipolar disorder and substance-induced psychotic disorder, though with overlapping right-skewed distributions. DPP was longer than DUP for all diagnoses except substance-induced psychotic disorder. Across functional psychotic diagnoses, longer DPP was predicted by higher premorbid intelligence and better premorbid adjustment during age 16-18 years. These findings indicate that, trans-diagnostically, DPP and DUP share right-skewed continuities, in accordance with a dimensional-spectrum model of psychotic illness, and may reflect a unitary process that has been dichotomized at a subjective threshold along its trajectory. Better premorbid functioning during age 16-18 years appears to confer resilience by delaying progression to overt psychotic symptoms and may constitute a particular target period for psychosocial interventions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19)对首发精神病(FEP)缓解患者的精神护理的影响尚不清楚。这项研究比较了人口统计学,临床,功能,以及在大流行之前和期间招募的患者的认知特征。结果显示,COVID患者年龄明显较大,吸烟者,酒精使用者,经历了更多的压力,功能优于前COVID患者。前者也有较少的严重的负面和一般的精神病理症状,更多的洞察力受损,较差的药物依从性,和更糟糕的认知表现。我们的发现强调了及时需要提高对经历大流行相关压力源的FEP患者的疾病和治疗的认识。
    The impact of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) on psychiatric care in remitted patients with first-episode psychosis (FEP) remains unknown. This study compared the demographic, clinical, functional, and cognitive profiles of patients recruited before and during the pandemic. The results showed that COVID patients were significantly older, smokers, alcohol users, experienced more stressors, with better functioning than pre-COVID patients. The former also had fewer severe negative and general psychopathological symptoms, more impaired insight, poorer medication compliance, and worse cognitive performance. Our findings highlighted a timely need to improve awareness into the illness and treatment in FEP patients experiencing pandemic related stressors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    先前的研究表明,脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)水平与抑郁症状的严重程度成反比。此外,血清BDNF水平随着抑郁症状的改善而增加。也有证据表明BDNF在精神分裂症的病理生理学中具有可能的作用。因此,本研究的目的是确定首发和未用药(FEDN)精神分裂症患者的BDNF水平是否与抑郁症状相关.在这项研究中,招募了90例FEDN精神分裂症患者和60例健康对照。采用阳性和阴性症状量表(PANSS)和17项汉密尔顿抑郁量表(HAMD-17)对精神病理和抑郁症状进行测量,分别。所有参与者都使用夹心酶联免疫吸附试验测量他们的BDNF水平。与健康对照组相比,FEDN精神分裂症患者的血清BDNF水平较低。此外,与无抑郁症状的患者相比,有抑郁症状的患者表现出更高的PANSS总分和更高的一般精神病理学评分(p<0.05).对于有抑郁症状的患者,血清BDNF水平高于无抑郁症状的患者(p<0.05)。还观察到BDNF水平与阳性亚分之间的关联(p<0.01)。然而,BDNF水平与HAMD评分无显著相关性(p>0.05)。总之,有抑郁症状的FEDN精神分裂症患者血清中的BDNF水平高于无抑郁症状的患者。此外,低水平的血清BDNF可能导致FEDN精神分裂症的阳性症状,但不导致抑郁症状。
    Previous studies have revealed that brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) levels are inversely associated with the severity of depressive symptoms. In addition, serum BDNF levels tend to increase with improvement in depressive symptoms. There is also evidence that BDNF has a possible role in the pathophysiology of schizophrenia. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine whether BDNF levels correlated with depressive symptoms in patients with first-episode and drug-naïve (FEDN) schizophrenia. In this study, 90 patients with FEDN schizophrenia and 60 healthy controls were recruited. The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) and the 17-item Hamilton Depression Scale (HAMD-17) were used to gage psychopathological and depressive symptoms, respectively. All participants had their BDNF levels measured using a sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent test. Serum BDNF levels were lower in patients with FEDN schizophrenia compared with healthy controls. Moreover, patients with depressive symptoms exhibited a higher PANSS total score and a higher general psychopathology score than those without depressive symptoms (p < 0.05). For patients with depressive symptoms, serum BDNF levels were higher than in those without depressive symptoms (p < 0.05). An association between BDNF levels and the positive subscore was also observed (p < 0.01). However, there was no significant association between BDNF levels and HAMD scores (p > 0.05). In conclusion, BDNF levels were shown to be higher in the serum of patients with FEDN schizophrenia with depressive symptoms than in those without. Additionally, low levels of serum BDNF may contribute to the positive symptoms of FEDN schizophrenia but not to depressive symptoms.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    面部情绪识别是与作为候选中间表型的精神障碍相关的社会认知的关键领域。在这项研究中,我们着手调查首发精神病的整体和特定面部情绪识别缺陷,以及精神病性障碍的多基因责任是否与面部情绪识别有关。
    828名首发精神病(FEP)患者和1308名基于人群的对照完成了对退化面部情感识别任务(DFAR)的评估,524名FEP和899名对照的子样本提供了我们从中提取DNA的血液或唾液样本,对精神分裂症(SZ)进行基因分型和计算多基因风险评分,双相情感障碍(BD),和重度抑郁症(MD)。
    与对照组相比,患者整体识别面部情绪表情的能力较差[B=-1.5(0.6),95%CI-2.7至-0.3],有证据表明对负面情绪有更强的影响(恐惧[B=-3.3(1.1),95%CI-5.3至-1.2]和愤怒[B=-2.3(1.1),95%CI-4.6至-0.1)比幸福感[B=0.3(0.7),95%CI-1至1.7]。汇集所有参与者,和控制混淆,包括病例/控制状态,面部愤怒识别与精神分裂症多基因风险评分(SZPRS)显著相关[B=-3.5(1.7),95%CI-6.9至-0.2]。
    精神病与恐惧和愤怒的认知受损有关,较高的SZPRS与较差的面部愤怒识别相关。我们的发现提供了证据,证明愤怒的面部情绪识别可能是精神病的中间表型。
    Facial Emotion Recognition is a key domain of social cognition associated with psychotic disorders as a candidate intermediate phenotype. In this study, we set out to investigate global and specific facial emotion recognition deficits in first-episode psychosis, and whether polygenic liability to psychotic disorders is associated with facial emotion recognition.
    828 First Episode Psychosis (FEP) patients and 1308 population-based controls completed assessments of the Degraded Facial Affect Recognition Task (DFAR) and a subsample of 524 FEP and 899 controls provided blood or saliva samples from which we extracted DNA, performed genotyping and computed polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia (SZ), bipolar disorder (BD), and major depressive disorder (MD).
    A worse ability to globally recognize facial emotion expressions was found in patients compared with controls [B= -1.5 (0.6), 95% CI -2.7 to -0.3], with evidence for stronger effects on negative emotions (fear [B = -3.3 (1.1), 95% CI -5.3 to -1.2] and anger [B = -2.3 (1.1), 95% CI -4.6 to -0.1]) than on happiness [B = 0.3 (0.7), 95% CI -1 to 1.7]. Pooling all participants, and controlling for confounds including case/control status, facial anger recognition was associated significantly with Schizophrenia Polygenic Risk Score (SZ PRS) [B = -3.5 (1.7), 95% CI -6.9 to -0.2].
    Psychosis is associated with impaired recognition of fear and anger, and higher SZ PRS is associated with worse facial anger recognition. Our findings provide evidence that facial emotion recognition of anger might play a role as an intermediate phenotype for psychosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经常报道首次发作精神病(FEP)患者的皮质厚度(CTh)异常,但是调查结果不一致。
    目的:通过对已发表的全脑研究的荟萃分析,定义FEP患者最一致的CTh变化。
    方法:荟萃分析使用基于种子的d作图(SDM)软件,以获得FEP中最突出的区域CTh变化,和荟萃回归分析,以探讨人口统计学和临床特征的影响。荟萃分析结果在142例FEP患者和142例年龄和性别匹配的健康对照(HCs)的独立样本中得到验证。同时使用顶点和感兴趣区域分析,进行多重比较校正。
    结果:荟萃分析确定右中颞叶皮质(MTC)的CTh较低,延伸至颞叶上皮质(STC),脑岛,FEP和前扣带回皮质(ACC)与HC相比。在CTh改变与人口统计学或临床变量之间没有发现显着相关性。这些结果在独立数据集分析中重复。
    结论:本研究确定了FEP中皮质异常的稳健模式,并扩展了对FEP中灰质异常和病理机制的理解。
    BACKGROUND: Abnormalities of cortical thickness (CTh) in patients with their first episode psychosis (FEP) have been frequently reported, but findings are inconsistent.
    OBJECTIVE: To define the most consistent CTh changes in patients with FEP by meta-analysis of published whole-brain studies.
    METHODS: The meta-analysis used seed-based d mapping (SDM) software to obtain the most prominent regional CTh changes in FEP, and meta-regression analyses to explore the effects of demographics and clinical characteristics. The meta-analysis results were verified in an independent sample of 142 FEP patients and 142 age- and sex-matched healthy controls (HCs), using both a vertex-wise and a region of interest analysis, with multiple comparisons correction.
    RESULTS: The meta-analysis identified lower CTh in the right middle temporal cortex (MTC) extending to superior temporal cortex (STC), insula, and anterior cingulate cortex (ACC) in FEP compared with HCs. No significant correlations were identified between CTh alterations and demographic or clinical variables. These results were replicated in the independent dataset analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study identifies a robust pattern of cortical abnormalities in FEP and extends understanding of gray matter abnormalities and pathological mechanisms in FEP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    This study systematically compared duration of untreated illness (DUI) with duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) in prediction of impairment at first-episode psychosis and investigated the extent to which these relationships are influenced by premorbid features. The Cavan-Monaghan First Episode Psychosis Study ascertained cases of first-episode psychosis in rural Ireland via all routes to care with limited variations in socioeconomic milieu. Cases were evaluated for DUI and DUP and assessed clinically for psychopathology, neuropsychology, neurology, insight and quality of life, together with premorbid features. Analyses then determined prediction of clinical assessments by DUI versus DUP. The study population consisted of 163 cases of first episode psychosis, among which 74 had a schizophrenia spectrum disorder. Shorter DUI but not DUP predicted less severe positive and general symptoms, while shorter DUP and particularly DUI predicted less severe negative symptoms; neither shorter DUP nor shorter DUI predicted less severe cognitive impairment or fewer neurological soft signs; shorter DUP and DUI predicted increased quality of life; shorter DUI but not DUP predicted greater insight. Only prediction of quality of life was weakened by consideration of premorbid features. Results were generally similar across the two diagnostic groupings. The present findings systematically delineate associations with DUI versus DUP across domains of impairment in first episode psychosis. They suggest that DUI may reflect a more insidious process than DUP and that reduction in DUI may be associated with more consistent and broader diminutions in impairment than for DUP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    The association between schizophrenia (SZ) and uric acid (UA) levels has been suggested for many years, but without solid evidence. Therefore, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of all case-control studies examining the serum and plasma UA levels in SZ subjects in comparison to those in healthy controls. Relevant studies published before October 29, 2018, were searched in the main electronic databases, and 17 studies were finally included into the meta-analysis after screening with the criteria. Our results revealed that there were no statistically significant differences of the UA levels between SZ subjects and healthy controls. Further subgroup analyses of the antipsychotic status reported the same finding. Subgroup analyses of clinical status showed that UA levels were decreased in subjects with first episode psychosis (FEP). The subgroup analyses of gender and ethnicity demonstrated that UA levels were decreased in male subjects and in Americans with SZ. Overall, these findings strengthen the clinical evidence that FEP is accompanied by increased oxidative stress response. Reduced UA levels may be a potential risk factor for SZ in male and in the Americans. However, whether there is a causal relationship between the reduced UA levels and the development of SZ deserves further investigation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    “急于得出结论”(JTC)偏见与精神病和一般认知有关,但它们的关系尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们着手澄清JTC偏差之间的关系,IQ,精神病和精神分裂症和智商的多基因责任。
    共有817名首发精神病患者和1294名基于人群的对照组完成了一般智力(IQ)评估,JTC,并提供血液或唾液样本,从中提取DNA并计算智商和精神分裂症的多基因风险评分。
    病例/对照差异对智商介导的JTC的总影响的估计比例为79%。精神分裂症多基因风险评分与较高的珠子数量无显着相关(B=0.47,95%CI-0.21至1.16,p=0.17);而智商PRS(B=0.51,95%CI0.25-0.76,p<0.001)显着预测了珠子的数量。因此与JTC偏倚减少有关。JTC与对照组中更高水平的精神病样经历(PLE)密切相关,包括控制智商后(B=-1.7,95%CI-2.8至-0.5,p=0.006),但与患者的妄想无关。
    我们的研究结果表明,精神病中的JTC推理偏差可能不是特定的认知缺陷,而是一种表现或后果。一般认知障碍。然而,在普通人群中,JTC偏差与PLE有关,独立于IQ这项工作有可能为早期精神病中针对认知偏见的干预措施提供信息。
    The \'jumping to conclusions\' (JTC) bias is associated with both psychosis and general cognition but their relationship is unclear. In this study, we set out to clarify the relationship between the JTC bias, IQ, psychosis and polygenic liability to schizophrenia and IQ.
    A total of 817 first episode psychosis patients and 1294 population-based controls completed assessments of general intelligence (IQ), and JTC, and provided blood or saliva samples from which we extracted DNA and computed polygenic risk scores for IQ and schizophrenia.
    The estimated proportion of the total effect of case/control differences on JTC mediated by IQ was 79%. Schizophrenia polygenic risk score was non-significantly associated with a higher number of beads drawn (B = 0.47, 95% CI -0.21 to 1.16, p = 0.17); whereas IQ PRS (B = 0.51, 95% CI 0.25-0.76, p < 0.001) significantly predicted the number of beads drawn, and was thus associated with reduced JTC bias. The JTC was more strongly associated with the higher level of psychotic-like experiences (PLEs) in controls, including after controlling for IQ (B = -1.7, 95% CI -2.8 to -0.5, p = 0.006), but did not relate to delusions in patients.
    Our findings suggest that the JTC reasoning bias in psychosis might not be a specific cognitive deficit but rather a manifestation or consequence, of general cognitive impairment. Whereas, in the general population, the JTC bias is related to PLEs, independent of IQ. The work has the potential to inform interventions targeting cognitive biases in early psychosis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据报道,每天使用高效大麻具有发展为精神病的高风险。然而,在首发精神病(FEP)患者中,大麻使用模式是否与特定症状相关的证据不一.
    我们分析了来自6个国家/地区招募的901名FEP患者和1235名对照者的数据。作为欧洲国家精神分裂症网络研究基因-环境相互作用(EU-GEI)研究的一部分。我们使用项目响应建模来估计两个双因素模型,其中包括患者精神病症状的一般和特定方面以及对照组的精神病经历。使用线性混合效应模型分析评估了这些维度与大麻使用之间的关联。
    在患者中,阳性症状维度与终生接触大麻的程度之间存在线性关系,高效大麻的每日使用者得分最高(B=0.35;95%CI0.14-0.56)。此外,阴性症状在从未使用过大麻的患者中比在任何模式下使用过大麻的患者更为常见(B=-0.22;95%CI-0.37~-0.07).在控件中,精神病经历与目前使用大麻有关,但与终生使用的程度无关.患者和对照组均未出现与大麻使用相关的抑郁维度差异。
    我们的研究结果提供了第一个大规模证据,证明有每日使用高效大麻史的FEP患者表现出更多的阳性症状和较少的阴性症状,与从未使用过大麻或使用低效力类型的人相比。
    Daily use of high-potency cannabis has been reported to carry a high risk for developing a psychotic disorder. However, the evidence is mixed on whether any pattern of cannabis use is associated with a particular symptomatology in first-episode psychosis (FEP) patients.
    We analysed data from 901 FEP patients and 1235 controls recruited across six countries, as part of the European Network of National Schizophrenia Networks Studying Gene-Environment Interactions (EU-GEI) study. We used item response modelling to estimate two bifactor models, which included general and specific dimensions of psychotic symptoms in patients and psychotic experiences in controls. The associations between these dimensions and cannabis use were evaluated using linear mixed-effects models analyses.
    In patients, there was a linear relationship between the positive symptom dimension and the extent of lifetime exposure to cannabis, with daily users of high-potency cannabis having the highest score (B = 0.35; 95% CI 0.14-0.56). Moreover, negative symptoms were more common among patients who never used cannabis compared with those with any pattern of use (B = -0.22; 95% CI -0.37 to -0.07). In controls, psychotic experiences were associated with current use of cannabis but not with the extent of lifetime use. Neither patients nor controls presented differences in depressive dimension related to cannabis use.
    Our findings provide the first large-scale evidence that FEP patients with a history of daily use of high-potency cannabis present with more positive and less negative symptoms, compared with those who never used cannabis or used low-potency types.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号