BACKGROUND: A previous meta-analysis indicated stable progress in cognitive functions in early psychosis, assessed through various tools. To avoid assessment-related heterogeneity, this study aims to examine the longitudinal cognitive function changes in early psychosis utilizing the MATRICS Consensus Cognitive Battery (MCCB).
METHODS: Embase, PubMed, and Scopus were systematically searched from their inception to September 26th 2023. The inclusion criteria were longitudinal studies that presented follow-up MCCB data for individuals experiencing first-episode psychosis (FEP) and those with ultra-high risk for psychosis (UHR).
RESULTS: Twelve studies with 791 participants (566 FEP patients and 225 healthy controls) were subjected to analysis. Suitable UHR studies were absent. Over time, both FEP patients and healthy controls showed significant improvements in MCCB total scores. Furthermore, FEP patients demonstrated improvements across all MCCB domains, while healthy controls only showed augmentations in specific domains such as speed of processing, attention, working memory, and reasoning and problem-solving. Visuospatial learning improvements were significantly greater in FEP patients compared to healthy controls. Subgroup analyses suggested that neither diagnostic type nor follow-up duration influenced the magnitude of cognitive improvement in FEP patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The magnitude of cognitive improvement for MCCB domains was not significantly different between FEP and healthy controls other than visuospatial learning. This underscores visuospatial learning as a potentially sensitive cognitive marker for early pathologic state changes in psychotic disorders.

Schizophrenia is mostly a chronic disorder whose symptoms include psychosis, negative symptoms and cognitive dysfunction. Poor adherence is common and related relapse can impair outcomes. Long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAIs) may promote treatment adherence and decrease the likelihood of relapse and rehospitalization. Using LAIs in first-episode psychosis (FEP) and early-phase (EP) schizophrenia patients could benefit them, yet LAIs have traditionally been reserved for chronic patients.
A three-step modified Delphi panel process was used to obtain expert consensus on using LAIs with FEP and EP schizophrenia patients. A literature review and input from a steering committee of five experts in psychiatry were used to develop statements about patient population, adverse event management, and functional recovery. Recruited Delphi process psychiatrists rated the extent of their agreement with the statements over three rounds (Round 1: paper survey, 1:1 interview; Rounds 2-3: email survey). Analysis rules determined whether a statement progressed to the next round and the level of agreement deemed consensus. Measures of central tendency (mode, mean) and variability (interquartile range) were reported back to help panelists assess their previous responses in the context of those of the overall group.
The Delphi panelists were 17 psychiatrists experienced in treating schizophrenia with LAIs, practicing in seven countries (France, Italy, US, Germany, Spain, Denmark, UK). Panelists were presented with 73 statements spanning three categories: patient population; medication dosage, management, and adverse events; and functional recovery domains and assessment. Fifty-five statements achieved ≥ 80% agreement (considered consensus). Statements with low agreement (40-79%) or very low agreement (< 39%) concerned initiating dosage in FEP and EP patients, and managing loss of efficacy and breakthrough episodes, reflecting current evidence gaps. The panel emphasized benefits of LAIs in FEP and EP patients, with consensus that LAIs can decrease the risk of relapse, rehospitalization, and functional dysfunction. The panel supported links between these benefits and multidimensional longer-term functional recovery beyond symptomatic remission.
Findings from this Delphi panel support the use of LAIs in FEP and EP schizophrenia patients regardless of disease severity, number of relapses, or social support status. Gaps in clinician knowledge make generating evidence on using LAIs in FEP and EP patients critical.

暂无摘要。