first episode psychosis

首发精神病
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    该案例突出了一种不寻常的表现,即睡眠问题先于精神病症状,暗示睡眠中断和精神病发作之间的联系。早期症状被视为抑郁症,但可能预示着失眠加剧了精神病。
    睡眠障碍,在精神病患者中普遍存在但经常被忽视,与精神病的发病和严重程度有显著关联。在这里,我们描述了一个患者首次出现失眠的情况,但他的病情随着利培酮的使用而改善,并被诊断为首发精神病。多项研究强调睡眠障碍和精神病之间的关键关系,特别是在首发精神病之前。大脑结构异常,特别是丘脑,结合涉及多巴胺和乙酰胆碱的神经递质失衡,在这种相互关系中似乎至关重要。多巴胺之间的联系,睡眠障碍,和精神病,特别是D2多巴胺受体的作用,强调了一个潜在的途径桥接睡眠不规则与精神病。该研究强调需要进一步研究来描述睡眠障碍和精神病之间的关系,并评估针对这两种情况的各种治疗干预措施的有效性。
    UNASSIGNED: The case highlights an unusual presentation where sleep issues preceded psychotic symptoms, implying link between disrupted sleep and psychosis onset. Earlier symptoms were viewed as depression but may have signaled psychosis exacerbated by insomnia.
    UNASSIGNED: Sleep disorders, prevalent yet frequently overlooked in individuals with psychotic disorders, have significant associations with the onset and severity of psychosis. Here we describe the case of a patient who first presented with insomnia, but whose condition improved with the use of risperidone and was diagnosed with first-episode psychosis. Multiple studies emphasize the critical relationship between sleep disturbances and psychosis, particularly in the lead-up to first-episode psychosis. Structural abnormalities in the brain, notably the thalamus, combined with neurotransmitter imbalances involving dopamine and acetylcholine, seem pivotal in this interrelation. The connection between dopamine, sleep disturbances, and psychosis, specifically the role of D2 dopamine receptors, highlights a potential pathway bridging sleep irregularities with psychosis. The study underscores the need for further research to delineate the relationship between sleep disturbances and psychosis and to assess the efficacy of various therapeutic interventions targeting both conditions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    “精神病早期干预”(EIP)服务与改善早期精神病的预后有关。然而,这些服务是异构的,许多服务提供不同的治疗成分。这种变化对持续治疗效果的影响是未知的。
    我们对随机对照试验(RCT)进行了系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析(cNMA),比较了早期精神病的专门干预服务。我们搜索了CENTRAL(已发布和未发布),EMBASE,MEDLINE,CINAHL,PsycINFO和WebofScience从成立到2023年2月。主要结果是3个月和1年随访时的阴性和阳性精神病症状以及治疗退出。次要结果是1年随访时的抑郁症状和社会功能。我们在PROSPERO(CRD42017057420)中注册了研究方案。
    我们确定了37个RCT,包括4599名参与者。参与者的平均年龄为25.8岁(SD6.0),64.0%为男性。我们发现证据表明,心理干预(这部分将所有旨在治疗的心理治疗分组,或者减轻后果,精神病性症状)有利于减少3个月随访时的阴性症状(iSMD-0.24,95%CI-0.44至-0.05,p=0.014),并且可能与改善1年随访时社会功能评分的临床相关益处有关(iSMD-0.52,95%CI-1.05至0.01,p=0.052)。增加病例管理对减少阴性症状(iSMD-1.17,95%CI-2.24至-0.11,p=0.030)和阳性症状(iSMD-1.05,95%CI-2.02至-0.08,p=0.033)具有有益作用。药物治疗存在于所有试验组中,这意味着不可能检查该组件的具体影响。
    我们的研究结果表明,除了药物治疗外,心理干预和病例管理是早期精神病服务的核心组成部分,以实现持续的临床获益。我们的结论受到少量研究和稀疏连接网络的限制。
    国家卫生和护理研究所。
    UNASSIGNED: \'Early Intervention in Psychosis\' (EIP) services have been associated with improved outcomes for early psychosis. However, these services are heterogeneous and many provide different components of treatment. The impact of this variation on the sustained treatment effects is unknown.
    UNASSIGNED: We performed a systematic review and component network meta-analysis (cNMA) of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) that compared specialised intervention services for early psychosis. We searched CENTRAL (published and unpublished), EMBASE, MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science from inception to February 2023. Primary outcomes were negative and positive psychotic symptoms at 3-month and 1-year follow-up and treatment dropouts. Secondary outcomes were depressive symptoms and social functioning at 1-year follow-up. We registered a protocol for our study in PROSPERO (CRD42017057420).
    UNASSIGNED: We identified 37 RCTs including 4599 participants. Participants\' mean age was 25.8 years (SD 6.0) and 64.0% were men. We found evidence that psychological interventions (this component grouped all psychological treatment intended to treat, or ameliorate the consequences of, psychotic symptoms) are beneficial for reducing negative symptoms (iSMD -0.24, 95% CI -0.44 to -0.05, p = 0.014) at 3-month follow-up and may be associated with clinically relevant benefits in improving social functioning scores at 1-year follow-up (iSMD -0.52, 95% CI -1.05 to 0.01, p = 0.052). The addition of case management has a beneficial effect on reducing negative symptoms (iSMD -1.17, 95% CI -2.24 to -0.11, p = 0.030) and positive symptoms (iSMD -1.05, 95% CI -2.02 to -0.08, p = 0.033) at 1-year follow-up. Pharmacotherapy was present in all trial arms, meaning it was not possible to examine the specific effects of this component.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings suggest psychological interventions and case management in addition to pharmacotherapy as the core components of services for early psychosis to achieve sustained clinical benefits. Our conclusions are limited by the small number of studies and sparsely connected networks.
    UNASSIGNED: National Institute for Health and Care Research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    目的:临床精神病高危人群(CHR-P)和首发精神病患者(FEP)中,未治疗精神病(DUP)持续时间过长和未治疗疾病(DUI)持续时间过长与预后较差相关。然而,患有FEP的人通常会遇到涉及与警察接触的负面护理途径,危机服务并要求强制入学,有证据表明,FEP和CHR-P患者通常会长期延迟治疗。早期检测干预措施,如公共卫生干预,可能是减少延误的一种方法。本系统综述旨在综合此类干预措施的现有证据。
    方法:EMBASE,心理信息,CINAHL,和MEDLINE数据库进行了搜索。如果将旨在改善FEP或CHR-P患者及时获得治疗的干预措施与标准治疗提供进行比较,则纳入研究。干预措施可能针对潜在患者,他们的家人,广大市民,或非医疗保健专业人员。感兴趣的结果是DUP或DUI,和/或护理途径的特征。
    结果:19项研究符合纳入标准。全部由FEP人群组成,没有CHR-P人群。采用叙事综合,我们发现,干预措施在降低DUP方面的效果好坏参半,且干预措施似乎对各组产生不同影响.获得护理信息的途径有限且混杂。
    结论:关于旨在改善及时获得治疗的干预措施的有效性的结果尚无定论。有必要进行更多的研究,以更好地了解FEP和CHR-P人群的延误发生地点以及可能影响延误的因素,这可能有助于制定有针对性的干预措施来解决延误问题。
    OBJECTIVE: Lengthy duration of untreated psychosis (DUP) and duration of untreated illness (DUI) in people at clinical high-risk for psychosis (CHR-P) and first episode psychosis (FEP) is associated with poorer outcomes. However, individuals with FEP often experience negative pathways to care involving contacts with police, crisis services and requiring compulsory admissions, and evidence suggests individuals with both FEP and CHR-P often experience lengthy delays to treatment. Early detection interventions, such as public health interventions, may be one way to reduce delays. This systematic review aimed to synthesise the available evidence on such interventions.
    METHODS: The EMBASE, PsychINFO, CINAHL, and MEDLINE databases were searched. Studies were included if they compared an intervention designed to improve timely access to treatment for individuals with FEP or CHR-P to standard treatment provision. Interventions may be targeted at potential patients, their families, the general public, or non-healthcare professionals. Outcomes of interest were DUP or DUI, and/or characteristics of pathways to care.
    RESULTS: Nineteen studies met the inclusion criteria. All consisted of FEP populations, none of CHR-P populations. Employing narrative synthesis, we found mixed results about the effectiveness of interventions at reducing DUP and interventions appeared to differentially impact groups. Pathways to care information was limited and mixed.
    CONCLUSIONS: Findings on the effectiveness of interventions designed to improve timely access to treatment were inconclusive. More research is warranted to better understand where delays occur and factors which may influence this for both FEP and CHR-P populations which may help to develop targeted interventions to address delays.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本综述的目的是总结有关边缘性人格障碍(BPD)与早期精神病之间关系的主要文献贡献。在追溯“边界线”一词的历史路径时,在BPD中特别注意精神病和精神病样症状.评估了其与危险心理状态的关系,也是。
    方法:这项搜索是在PUBMED/MEDLINE和PsycInfo上进行的,寻找“边缘性人格障碍,第一集精神病,早期精神病,精神病的超高风险和/或临床高风险。
    结果:确定了关于这个主题的八篇相关论文。然后讨论了他们的主要发现。“边界线”一词在含义和用法上发生了不同的变化,尽管总是提到神经症和精神病之间的栅栏上考虑的国家。然而,考虑到精神病理学的历史及其与诊断手册的关系,很少关注它的精神病特征。由于这些症状很严重,这种忽视往往导致误诊和治疗不足。
    结论:BPD患者的精神病症状可能严重且令人痛苦。尽管如此,它们很容易被忽视,当发现时,他们挑战临床医生定义鉴别诊断以区分BPD和精神病谱系障碍。鉴于这些不同条件的具体需求和干预措施,一个维度,而不是绝对的,应该考虑的方法,以及应建议具体的护理途径和监测。
    BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present review was to summarize the main literature contribution on the relationship between borderline personality disorder (BPD) and early psychosis. While retracing the historical path of the term \"borderline\", specific attention was paid to psychotic and psychotic-like symptoms in BPD. Its relationship with At Risk Mental State was evaluated, as well.
    METHODS: This search was conducted on PUBMED/MEDLINE and PsycInfo, looking for \"Borderline personality disorder, First Episode Psychosis, Early Psychosis, Ultra-High Risk AND/OR Clinical High Risk\" for psychosis.
    RESULTS: Eight pertinent papers were identified on this topic. Their main findings were then discussed. The term \"borderline\" has undergone different changes in meaning and use, despite always referring to states considered on the fence between neurosis and psychosis. However, considering the history of psychopathology and its relationship with diagnostic manuals, little attention has been given to its psychotic features. Being those symptoms highly burdensome, this neglect has often led to misdiagnosis and under-treatment.
    CONCLUSIONS: Psychotic symptoms in BPD can be severe and distressing. Nonetheless they can be easily neglected, and when found they challenge clinicians in defining a differential diagnosis to distinguish between BPD and Psychosis Spectrum Disorders. Given specific needs and interventions for these different conditions, a dimensional, rather than categorical, approach should be considered, as well as specific care pathways and monitoring should be advised.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    在文献中发现了精神病谱系障碍与自杀之间相关性的证据,以及大麻使用障碍(CUD)和自杀之间以及CUD和精神分裂症之间。所选论文的研究人群由被诊断患有精神分裂症谱或大麻或SC诱导的精神病的受试者组成。我们的目标是评估该人群的自杀风险(定义为自杀意念/自杀企图或自杀死亡)可能随暴露于大麻或其主要活性化合物之一而变化。我们搜索了PubMed,2010年1月至2022年2月的Scopus和Psycinfo数据库。纳入文章的研究设计分布如下:6项横断面研究,3项队列研究,1项病例对照研究,1项随机双盲研究,1例报告。选定的队列研究似乎在确定暴露于大麻使用时精神分裂症谱系障碍患者的自杀风险增加方面达成一致。病例对照研究和选定的横断面研究提供了相互矛盾的数据。然而,定性分析似乎表明,精神分裂症谱系障碍患者使用大麻与自杀风险增加之间存在正相关.总之,关于精神分裂症或其他精神分裂症谱系障碍患者使用大麻与自杀风险之间的相关性的新数据不足以得出确切的结论。尽管如此,这些研究似乎表明使用大麻与自杀风险增加呈正相关,特别是关于首发精神病(FEP)和男性。临床医生应该意识到在FEP期间与男性和患者使用大麻有关的自杀行为的风险更高。
    Proof of correlation between psychotic spectrum disorders and suicide are found in literature, as well as between cannabis use disorder (CUD) and suicide and between CUD and schizophrenia. The study population of the selected papers consists of subjects diagnosed with schizophrenia spectrum or cannabis or SCs induced psychosis. Our objective is to assess how suicide risk (defined as suicidal ideation/attempt or death by suicide) in this population may vary with exposure to cannabis or one of its main active compounds. We searched PubMed, Scopus and Psycinfo database from January 2010 to February 2022. Study designs of the included articles are distributed as follows: 6 cross-sectional studies, 3 cohort studies, 1 case-control studies, 1 randomized double-blind study, 1 case report. Selected cohort studies seem to agree in identifying an increased suicide risk in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders when exposed to cannabis use. The case-control study and selected cross-sectionals provide contradictory data. However, qualitative analysis seem to point toward a positive correlation between cannabis use and increased suicidal risk in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders. In conclusion, emerging data on the correlation between cannabis use and suicide risk in patients with schizophrenia or other schizophrenic spectrum disorders are insufficient to draw firm conclusions. Nonetheless these studies seem to suggest a positive correlation of cannabis use with increased suicide risk, particularly regarding first episode psychosis (FEP) and male gender. Clinicians should be aware of the possibility of a higher risk of suicidal behavior associated specifically with cannabis use for men and patients during FEP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    首发精神病(FEP)被定义为妄想的第一次出现,幻觉,或者严重的精神混乱,持续7天以上。进化很难预测,因为在三分之一的病例中,第一次发作仍然是孤立的,而复发发生在另三分之一,最后三分之一进展为分裂情感障碍。有人认为,精神病越长越不被注意和未经治疗,复发和恢复的可能性越严重。核磁共振成像已经成为精神疾病成像的黄金标准,尤其是首发精神病.除了排除一些可能有精神病表现的神经系统疾病,先进的成像技术允许识别精神疾病的成像生物标志物。我们对文献进行了系统的回顾,以确定FEP的高级成像如何对疾病的发展具有高度的诊断特异性和预测价值。
    First-episode psychosis (FEP) is defined as the first occurrence of delusions, hallucinations, or psychic disorganization of significant magnitude, lasting more than 7 days. Evolution is difficult to predict since the first episode remains isolated in one third of cases, while recurrence occurs in another third, and the last third progresses to a schizo-affective disorder. It has been suggested that the longer psychosis goes unnoticed and untreated, the more severe the probability of relapse and recovery. MRI has become the gold standard for imaging psychiatric disorders, especially first episode psychosis. Besides ruling out some neurological conditions that may have psychiatric manifestations, advanced imaging techniques allow for identifying imaging biomarkers of psychiatric disorders. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine how advanced imaging in FEP may have high diagnostic specificity and predictive value regarding the evolution of disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:最近的研究报道,在高危和首发精神病患者中,强迫症状和强迫症的患病率很高。这引发了对这些症状在患者临床特征和结果中的影响的兴趣。然而,这些研究从未进行过正式的荟萃分析。
    方法:系统评价和荟萃分析高危精神病患者和首发精神病患者中强迫症状和强迫症的患病率,并比较有无强迫症状患者的临床特征和结果。
    结果:强迫症的发生率分别为7.9%(5.9至10.0%)和10.5%(8.3至12.8%),强迫症状的发生率分别为21.4%(8.3至38.2%)和34.0%(26.3至42.1%)。强迫症状的发生率具有高度异质性,部分原因是测量方法和临界值不同。发现OCS和精神病症状的发病年龄相似(平均差异-0.49岁,95%CI-1.74至0.77)。具有强迫症状的患者的阳性和阴性综合征量表(阳性子量表)得分在统计学上无统计学意义,而抑郁得分则稍高。两组的发病年龄没有差异,阳性和阴性综合征量表(阴性子量表)评分,转化为精神病的风险,焦虑评分,自杀率,和功能评分。
    结论:强迫症和强迫症状在有风险和首发精神病患者中非常普遍。
    Recent studies have reported high prevalences of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and obsessive-compulsive disorder in at risk and first-episode psychosis patients. This sparked an interest in the effect of these symptoms in the clinical characteristics and outcomes of patients. However these studies have never been formally meta-analyzed.
    Systematic review and meta-analysis of prevalence of obsessive-compulsive symptoms and obsessive-compulsive disorder in at risk and first-episode psychosis patients and comparison of clinical characteristics and outcomes in patients with and without obsessive-compulsive symptoms.
    Obsessive-compulsive disorder was present in 7.9 % (5.9 to 10.0 %) and 10.5 % (8.3 to 12.8 %) and obsessive-compulsive symptoms in 21.4 % (8.3 to 38.2 %) and 34.0 % (26.3 to 42.1 %) of at risk and first episode psychosis patients respectively. The prevalences of obsessive-compulsive symptoms had high heterogeneity due in part to different measurement methods and cut-off values. Similar ages of onset for OCS and psychosis symptoms were found (mean difference - 0.49 years, 95 % CI -1.74 to 0.77). Patients with obsessive-compulsive symptoms had statistically insignificant higher Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (positive subscale) scores and marginally higher depression scores. There were no differences between both groups in age of onset, Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (negative subscale) score, risk of conversion to psychosis, anxiety score, suicide rate, and functionality score.
    Obsessive-compulsive disorder and obsessive-compulsive symptoms are very prevalent in at risk and first-episode psychosis patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    UNASSIGNED: This systematic review aimed to answer whether we can predict subsequent social functioning in first episode psychosis (FEP) by means of an initial cognitive examination. In order to do this, we gathered longitudinal studies which evaluated neurocognition and/or social cognition regarding their impact on long-term social functioning of FEP patients.
    UNASSIGNED: The MOOSE method was employed and 28 studies covering data from a total of 2572 patients with longitudinal trajectories from 2 months to 5 years were reviewed.
    UNASSIGNED: In general, cognitive deficits impacted on the social functioning of the FEP patients across the time. The neurocognitive domains which most closely predicted social functioning were processing speed, sustained attention and working memory. An overall cognitive dysfunction, low IQ and the academic trajectory were also found predictive. Regarding social cognition, the findings were not unanimous.
    UNASSIGNED: In addition of the impact of each variable, several of the articles found a complex relationship between social cognition, neurocognition, social functioning and negative symptoms, pointing social cognition as a modulator of neurocognition but being modulated as well by negative symptoms. The principal clinical implication of this review is that the initial assessment of FEP patients and their rehabilitation must take cognition into account.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:据报道,首次发作精神病(FEP)的抗精神病药物初治患者的催乳素和皮质醇水平发生改变。然而,它已经在非常小的样本中进行了研究,组间变异性以前从未被研究过。
    目的:提供催乳素的标准化平均差异(SMD)和组间变异性的估计,抗精神病药幼稚FEP(AN-FEP)患者和健康对照(HC)的皮质醇觉醒反应(CAR)和早晨皮质醇浓度。
    方法:生物,KCIMEDLINE,俄罗斯科学引文索引,SciELO,科克伦,PsycINFO,WebofScience从成立到2022年2月28日进行了搜索。
    方法:纳入了同行评审的队列研究,这些研究报道了ANFEP患者和HC的催乳素或皮质醇血药浓度。
    方法:研究特征,从每篇文章中提取平均值和标准偏差(SD)。使用Hedgesg估计效应大小的组间差异。用变异系数比(CVR)估计组间变异性。在这两种情况下,估计值都使用随机效应荟萃分析进行汇总。使用元回归估计研究水平特征的差异。遵循PRISMA指南(编号CRD42022303555)。
    方法:催乳素,与HC组相比,AN-FEP组的CAR和早晨皮质醇血液浓度。
    结果:关于催乳素的14项研究(AN-FEP组N=761,HC组N=687)和12项早晨皮质醇研究(AN-FEP组N=434,包括HC组的N=528)。在AN-FEP患者中没有发现CAR的研究。男性催乳素血药浓度的平均SMD为0.88(95%CI0.57,1.20),女性为0.56(95%CI0.26,0.87)。作为一个群体,与HC相比,AN-FEP表现出更大的催乳素水平组间变异性(CVR=1.28,95%CI1.02,1.62)。早晨皮质醇浓度的SMD无显着:0.34(95%CI-0.01,0.69),并且没有检测到组间变异性显着差异:CVR=1.05(95%CI0.91,1.20)。年龄和质量的Meta回归分析无统计学意义。漏斗图没有表明发表偏倚。
    结论:在AN-FEP患者中发现催乳素水平升高。AN-FEP组的组间差异更大,表明存在催乳素水平不同的患者亚组。早晨皮质醇水平未发现明显异常。需要进一步的研究来阐明催乳素浓度是否可以用作疾病生物标志物。
    Alterations in prolactin and cortisol levels have been reported in antipsychotic naïve patients with first episode psychosis (FEP). However, it has been studied in very small samples, and inter-group variability has never been studied before.
    To provide estimates of standardized mean differences (SMD) and inter-group variability for prolactin, cortisol awakening response (CAR) and morning cortisol concentrations in antipsychotic naïve FEP (AN-FEP) patients and healthy controls (HC).
    BIOSIS, KCI, MEDLINE, Russian Science Citation Index, SciELO, Cochrane, PsycINFO, Web of Science were searched from inception to February 28, 2022.
    Peer-reviewed cohort studies that reported on prolactin or cortisol blood concentrations in AN- FEP patients and HC were included.
    Study characteristics, means and standard deviations (SD) were extracted from each article. Inter group differences in magnitude of effect were estimated using Hedges g. Inter-group variability was estimated with the coefficient of variation ratio (CVR). In both cases estimates were pooled using random-effects meta-analysis. Differences by study-level characteristics were estimated using meta-regression. PRISMA guideline was followed (No. CRD42022303555).
    Prolactin, CAR and morning cortisol blood concentrations in AN-FEP group in relation to HC group.
    Fourteen studies for prolactin (N = 761 for AN-FEP group, N = 687 for HC group) and twelve studies for morning cortisol (N = 434 for AN-FEP group, N = 528 for HC group) were included. No studies were found in CAR in AN-FEP patients. Mean SMD for prolactin blood concentration was 0.88 (95% CI 0.57, 1.20) for male and 0.56 (95% CI 0.26, 0.87) for female. As a group, AN-FEP presented greater inter-group variability for prolactin levels than HC (CVR=1.28, 95% CI 1.02, 1.62). SMD for morning cortisol concentrations was non-significant: 0.34 (95% CI -0.01, 0.69) and no inter-group variability significant differences were detected: CVR= 1.05 (95% CI 0.91, 1.20). Meta-regression analyses for age and quality were non-significant. Funnel plots did not suggest a publication bias.
    Increased prolactin levels were found in AN-FEP patients. A greater inter-group variability in the AN-FEP group suggests the existence of patient subgroups with different prolactin levels. No significant abnormalities were found in morning cortisol levels. Further research is needed to clarify whether prolactin concentrations could be used as an illness biomarker.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:外周血脑源性神经营养因子(BDNF)水平可用作精神分裂症的诊断和/或预后指标。以前的研究不一致。进行了系统评价,以检查与健康对照(HC)相比,首发精神病(FEP)患者的BDNF水平是否不同,以及治疗后是否发生变化。方法:在PubMed进行文献检索,WebofScience,和谷歌学者遵循标准程序。对冲'g用作效应大小(ES)的量度,与随机效应模型合并。研究了出版偏倚和调节效应。结果:搜索产生了29项研究,总样本量为2912。首次荟萃分析包括27项FEP与HC比较。合并的ES为-0.63,p<0.001,表明FEP中的BDNF水平低于HC中的BDNF水平。研究是异质的,主持人分析显示,对年轻患者的研究,症状严重程度更高,更多的药物幼稚有更大的ES。第二次荟萃分析检查了8项研究中抗精神病药物治疗前后BDNF水平的变化。-0.003的合并ES(p=0.96)显示治疗后外周BDNF水平没有变化。结论:与HC相比,FEP中的外周血BDNF水平降低,但治疗后没有改变。
    Background: Peripheral blood level of brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) may be used as a diagnostic and/or prognostic marker for schizophrenia. Previous studies were inconsistent. A systematic review was conducted to examine whether BDNF level is different in patients with first episode psychosis (FEP) compared to health controls (HC) and whether it changes after treatment. Methods: Literature search was done in PubMed, Web of Science, and Google Scholar following standard procedures. Hedges’ g was used as the measure of effect size (ES), which was pooled with random effects model. Publication bias and moderator effects were examined. Results: Search yielded 29 studies with a total sample size of 2912. First meta-analysis included 27 studies with FEP vs. HC comparison. Pooled ES was −0.63, p < 0.001, indicating that BDNF level was lower in FEP than in HC. Studies were heterogeneous, and moderator analysis showed that studies of younger patient, higher symptom severity, and more drug naïve had larger ES. Second meta-analysis examined change in BDNF levels before and after antipsychotic treatment in eight studies. A pooled ES of −0.003 (p = 0.96) showed no change in peripheral BDNF level after treatment. Conclusion: Peripheral BDNF level was decreased in FEP compared to HC, but it did not change after treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号