通过对74种相关出版物和我们的学习进行主题审查,教学,以及研究经验和专业知识,我们讨论了“反身性”的概念,\'敏感度\'和\'完整性\',以及加强或阻碍他们实践的因素。我们还根据定性研究中进行和解释访谈的阶段对敏感性水平进行了分类。通过对敏感度的三个级别进行分类,即,面试时灵敏度高,转录数据时灵敏度更高,在用实际例子解释数据时,灵敏度和临界性最高,我们提供了一种促进和支持道德面试应用的方法。我们得出的结论是,实现敏感性和自反性增强了整体研究的可信性,并反映了研究伦理和诚信在实践中的应用。
By employing a thematic review of 74 relevant publications and our learning, teaching, and research experiences and expertise, we discussed the concepts of \'
reflexivity\', \'sensitivity\' and \'integrity\', and the factors that enhance or hinder their practice. We also categorized the levels of sensitivity according to the stages of conducting and interpreting interviews in qualitative research. By categorizing the three levels of sensitivity \'i.e., high sensitivity during interviewing, higher sensitivity during transcribing data, and highest sensitivity and criticality during interpreting data\' with practical examples, we offer an approach that facilitates and supports the application of ethical interviews. We conclude that achieving sensitivity and
reflexivity enhances the trustworthiness of the overall research and reflects the application of research ethics and integrity in practice.