UNASSIGNED: Psychosocial status and patient reported outcomes (PRO) [depression and health-related quality-of-life (HRQoL)] are major health determinants. We investigated the association between depression and clinical outcomes in Chinese patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D), adjusted for PRO.
UNASSIGNED: Using prospective data from Hong Kong Diabetes Register (2013-2019), we estimated the hazard-ratio (HR, 95%CI) of depression (validated Patient Health Questionnaire 9 (PHQ-9) score≥7) with incident cardiovascular disease (CVD), ischemic heart disease (IHD), chronic kidney disease (CKD: eGFR<60 ml/min/1.73m2) and all-cause mortality in 4525 Chinese patients with T2D adjusted for patient characteristics, renal function, medications, self-care and HRQoL domains (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, anxiety/depression measured by EQ-5D-3L) in linear-regression models.
UNASSIGNED: In this cohort without prior events [mean ± SD age:55.7 ± 10.6, 43.7% women, median (IQR) disease duration of 7.0 (2.0-13.0) years, HbA1c, 7.2% (6.6%-8.20%), 26.4% insulin-treated], 537(11.9%) patients had depressive symptoms and 1923 (42.5%) patients had some problems with HRQoL at baseline. After 5.6(IQR: 4.4-6.2) years, 141 patients (3.1%) died, 533(11.8%) developed CKD and 164(3.6%) developed CVD. In a fully-adjusted model (model 4) including self-care and HRQoL, the aHR of depression was 1.99 (95% confidence interval CI):1.25-3.18) for CVD, 2.29 (1.25-4.21) for IHD. Depression was associated with all-cause mortality in models 1-3 adjusted for demographics, clinical characteristics and self-care, but was attenuated after adjusting for HRQoL (model 4- 1.54; 95%CI: 0.91-2.60), though HR still indicated same direction with important magnitude. Patients who reported having regular exercise (3-4 times per week) had reduced aHR of CKD [0.61 (0.41-0.89)]. Item 4 of PHQ-9 (feeling tired, little energy) was independently associated with all-cause mortality with aHR of 1.66 (1.30-2.12).
UNASSIGNED: Depression exhibits significant association with CVD, IHD, and all-cause mortality in patients with diabetes, adjusting for their HRQoL and health behaviors. Despite the association between depression and all-cause mortality attenuated after adjusting for HRQoL, the effect size remains substantial. The feeling of tiredness or having little energy, as assessed by item Q4 of the PHQ-9 questionnaire, was found to be significantly associated with an increased risk of all-cause mortality after covariate adjustments. Our findings emphasize the importance of incorporating psychiatric evaluations into holistic diabetes management.

Complex disorders usually affect multiple symptom domains measured by several outcomes. The importance of these outcomes is often different among patients. Current approaches integrate multiple outcomes without considering patient preferences at the individual level. In this paper, we propose a new composite Desirability of Outcome Ranking (DOOR) that integrates individual level ranking of outcome importance and define a winning probability measuring the overall treatment effect. Stratified randomization can be performed based on the participants\' baseline outcome rankings. A Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney U-statistic is used to average the pairwise DOOR between one treated and one control patient, considering the difference in these patients\' ranking of outcome importance. We use both theoretical and empirical methods to examine the statistical properties of our method and to compare with conventional approaches. We conclude that the proposed composite DOOR properly reflects patient-level preferences and can be used in pivotal trials or comparative effectiveness trials for a patient-centered evaluation of overall treatment benefits.

BACKGROUND: This proof-of-concept retrospective case study investigated whether patient-reported outcomes (PRO) instruments, designed to capture symptomatic adverse event data, could identity a known exposure-response (ER) relationship for safety characterized in an original FDA analysis of an approved anti-cancer agent. PRO instruments have been designed to uniquely quantify the tolerability aspects of exposure-associated symptomatic adverse events. We explored whether standard ER analyses of clinician-reported safety data for symptomatic adverse events could be complemented by ER analysis using PRO data that capture and quantify the tolerability aspects of these same symptomatic adverse events.
METHODS: Exposure-associated adverse event data for diarrhea were analyzed in parallel in 120 patients enrolled in a clinical trial using physician reported Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) and patient-reported symptomatic adverse event data captured by the National Cancer Institute\'s (NCI) PRO Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (PRO-CTCAE) instrument. Comparative ER analyses of diarrhea were conducted using the same dataset. Results from the CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE ER analyses were assessed for consistency with the ER relationship for diarrhea established in the original NDA using a 750-patient dataset. The analysis was limited to the 120-patient subset with parallel CTCAE and PRO-CTCAE assessments.
RESULTS: Within the same 120-patient dataset, ER analysis using dense, longitudinal PRO-CTCAE-derived data was sensitive to identify the known ER relationship for diarrhea, whereas the standard CTCAE based ER analysis was not.
CONCLUSIONS: ER analysis using PRO assessed symptomatic adverse event data may be a sensitive tool to complement traditional ER analysis. Improved identification of relationships for safety, by including quantification of the tolerability aspect of symptomatic adverse events using PRO instruments, may be useful to improve the sensitivity of exposure response analysis to support early clinical trial dosage optimization strategies, where decision making occurs within limited small patient datasets.

Several minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion techniques may be used as a treatment for spondylolisthesis to alleviate back and leg pain, improve function and provide stability to the spine. Surgeons may choose an anterolateral or posterior approach for the surgery however, there remains a lack of real-world evidence from comparative, prospective studies on effectiveness and safety with relatively large, geographically diverse samples and involving multiple surgical approaches.
To test the hypothesis that anterolateral and posterior minimally invasive approaches are equally effective in treating patients with spondylolisthesis affecting one or two segments at 3-months follow-up and to report and compare patient reported outcomes and safety profiles between patients at 12-months post-surgery.
Prospective, multicenter, international, observational cohort study.
Patients with degenerative or isthmic spondylolisthesis who underwent 1- or 2-level minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion.
Patient reported outcomes assessing disability (ODI), back pain (VAS), leg pain (VAS) and quality of life (EuroQol 5D-3L) at 4-weeks, 3-months and 12-months follow-up; adverse events up to 12-months; and fusion status at 12-months post-surgery using X-ray and/or CT-scan. The primary study outcome is improvement in ODI score at 3-months.
Eligible patients from 26 sites across Europe, Latin America and Asia were consecutively enrolled. Surgeons with experience in minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion procedures used, according to clinical judgement, either an anterolateral (ie, ALIF, DLIF, OLIF) or posterior (MIDLF, PLIF, TLIF) approach. Mean improvement in disability (ODI) was compared between groups using ANCOVA with baseline ODI score used as a covariate. Paired t-tests were used to examine change from baseline in PRO for both surgical approaches at each timepoint after surgery. A secondary ANCOVA using a propensity score as a covariate was used to test the robustness of conclusions drawn from the between group comparison.
Participants receiving an anterolateral approach (n=114) compared to those receiving a posterior approach (n=112) were younger (56.9 vs 62.0 years, p <.001), more likely to be employed (49.1% vs 25.0%, p<.001), have isthmic spondylolisthesis (38.6% vs 16.1%, p<.001) and less likely to only have central or lateral recess stenosis (44.9% vs 68.4%, p=.004). There were no statistically significant differences between the groups for gender, BMI, tobacco use, duration of conservative care, grade of spondylolisthesis, or the presence of stenosis. At 3-months follow-up there was no difference in the amount of improvement in ODI between the anterolateral and posterior groups (23.2 ± 21.3 vs 25.8 ± 19.5, p=.521). There were no clinically meaningful differences between the groups on mean improvement for back- and leg-pain, disability, or quality of life until the 12-months follow-up. Fusion rates of those assessed (n=158; 70% of the sample), were equivalent between groups (anterolateral, 72/88 [81.8%] fused vs posterior, 61/70 [87.1%] fused; p=.390).
Patients with degenerative lumbar disease and spondylolisthesis who underwent minimally invasive lumbar interbody fusion presented statistically significant and clinically meaningful improvements from baseline up to 12-months follow-up. There were no clinically relevant differences between patients operated on using an anterolateral or posterior approach.

Systemic treatment options for NSCLC with brain metastases (BMs) are scarce. We evaluated the activity and safety of camrelizumab plus chemotherapy as first-line therapy in patients with advanced nonsquamous NSCLC with BMs.
This was a multicenter, single-arm, phase 2 trial (NCT04211090) conducted at seven hospitals in China. Eligible patients had treatment-naive metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC and BMs that were asymptomatic or symptoms controlled with dehydration therapy and no previous systemic treatment or local therapy for the target brain lesion. Patients received camrelizumab (200 mg) plus pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) and carboplatin (area under the curve 5) intravenously on day 1 of each 21-day cycle for four cycles, followed by maintenance with camrelizumab (200 mg) and pemetrexed (500 mg/m2) every 21 days until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or death. The primary end point was confirmed intracranial objective response rate according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1, which was primarily analyzed in the efficacy analysis set (EAS).
A total of 45 patients were enrolled and treated (full analysis set), with 40 patients having at least one post-baseline tumor assessment (EAS). As of August 30, 2022, median follow-up duration was 12.5 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 9.2-17.3). The confirmed intracranial objective response rate was 52.5% (95% CI: 36.1-68.5) in EAS and 46.7% (95% CI: 31.7-62.1) in full analysis set. The extracranial objective response rate was 47.5% (95% CI: 31.5-63.9) and 42.2% (95% CI: 27.7-57.8), respectively. Median intracranial progression-free survival was 7.6 months (95% CI: 4.6-not reached [NR]), median overall progression-free survival was 7.4 months (95% CI: 4.4-NR), and median overall survival was 21.0 months (95% CI: 15.9-NR). The most common treatment-related adverse events of grade 3 or higher were neutrophil count decrease (six [13.3%]) and anemia (four [8.9%]). One treatment-related death occurred owing to immune-related pneumonia. Linear mixed-effects model displayed that a positive trend for improvement in cognitive function and quality of life was observed based on Montreal Cognitive Assessment and Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Lung scores (p = 0.025, p < 0.001).
Camrelizumab plus pemetrexed and carboplatin was found to have an activity with manageable toxicity and to improve cognitive function and quality of life for patients with nonsquamous NSCLC with BMs in the first-line setting.

Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has potential radiobiologic and economic advantages over conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) in localized prostate cancer (PC). This study aimed to compare the effects of these two distinct fractionations on patient-reported quality of life (PRQOL) and tolerability.
In this prospective phase II study, patients with low- and intermediate-risk localized PC were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to the SBRT (36.25 Gy/5 fractions/2 weeks) or CFRT (76 Gy/38 fractions/7.5 weeks) treatment groups. The primary endpoint of variation in PRQOL at 1 year was assessed by changes in the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC) questionnaire scores and analysed by z-tests and t-tests.
Sixty-four eligible Chinese men were treated (SBRT, n = 31; CFRT, n = 33) with a median follow-up of 2.3 years. At 1 year, 40.0%/46.9% of SBRT/CFRT patients had a >5-point decrease in bowel score (p = 0.08/0.28), respectively, and 53.3%/46.9% had a >2-point decrease in urinary score (p = 0.21/0.07). There were no significant differences in EPIC score changes between the arms at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months, but SBRT was associated with significantly fewer grade ≥ 1 acute and 1-year late gastrointestinal toxicities (acute: 35% vs. 87%, p < 0.0001; 1-year late: 64% vs. 84%, p = 0.03), and grade ≥ 2 acute genitourinary toxicities (3% vs. 24%, p = 0.04) compared with CFRT.
SBRT offered similar PRQOL and less toxicity compared with CFRT in Chinese men with localized PC.

Background: Many patients face a financial burden due to their medications, which may lead to poor health outcomes. The behaviors of non-adherence due to financial difficulties, known as cost-related medication non-adherence (CRN), include taking smaller doses of drugs, skipping doses to make prescriptions last longer, or delaying prescriptions. To date, the prevalence of CRN remains unknown, and there are few studies about the association of CRN on self-reported healthcare utilization (Emergency room (ER) visits and outpatient visits) and self-reported health outcomes (health status and disability status) among older adults taking antidepressants. Objectives: The objectives were to 1) examine the CRN prevalence, and 2) determine the association of CRN on self-reported healthcare utilization and self-reported health outcomes. Methods: This study was a cross-sectional study of a sample of older adults from the Medicare Current Beneficiary Survey (MCBS) who reported having used antidepressants in 2017. Four logistic regressions were implemented to evaluate the association of CRN, and self-reported healthcare utilization and self-reported health outcomes. Results: The study identified 602 participants who were Medicare beneficiaries on antidepressants. The prevalence of CRN among antidepressant users was (16.61%). After controlling for covariates, CRN was associated with poorer self-reported outcomes but not statistically significant: general health status [odds ratio (OR): 0.67; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.39-1.16] and disability status (OR: 1.34; 95% CI: 0.83-2.14). In addition, CRN was associated with increased outpatient visits (OR: 1.89; 95% CI: 1.19-3.02), but not associated with ER visits (OR: 1.10; 95% CI: 0.69-1.76). Conclusion: For Medicare beneficiaries on antidepressants, CRN prevalence was high and contributed to more outpatient visits. The healthcare provider needs to define the reasoning for CRN and provide solutions to reduce the financial burden on the affected patient. Also, health care providers need to consider the factors that may enhance patient health status and healthcare efficiency.

UNASSIGNED: Prospective cohort.
UNASSIGNED: To prospectively evaluate PROs up to 5-years after complex ASD surgery.
UNASSIGNED: The Scoli-RISK-1 study enrolled 272 ASD patients undergoing surgery from 15 centers. Inclusion criteria was Cobb angle of >80°, corrective osteotomy for congenital or revision deformity, and/or 3-column osteotomy. The following PROs were measured prospectively at intervals up to 5-years postoperative: ODI, SF36-PCS/MCS, SRS-22, NRS back/leg. Among patients with 5-year follow-up, comparisons were made from both baseline and 2-years postoperative to 5-years postoperative. PROs were analyzed using mixed models for repeated measures.
UNASSIGNED: Seventy-seven patients (28.3%) had 5-year follow-up data. Comparing baseline to 5-year data among these 77 patients, significant improvement was seen in all PROs: ODI (45.2 vs. 29.3, P < 0.001), SF36-PCS (31.5 vs. 38.8, P < 0.001), SF36-MCS (44.9 vs. 49.1, P = 0.009), SRS-22-total (2.78 vs. 3.61, P < 0.001), NRS-back pain (5.70 vs. 2.95, P < 0.001) and NRS leg pain (3.64 vs. 2.62, P = 0.017). In the 2 to 5-year follow-up period, no significant changes were seen in any PROs. The percentage of patients achieving MCID from baseline to 5-years were: ODI (62.0%) and the SRS-22r domains of function (70.4%), pain (63.0%), mental health (37.5%), self-image (60.3%), and total (60.3%). Surprisingly, mean values (P > 0.05) and proportion achieving MCID did not differ significantly in patients with major surgery-related complications compared to those without.
UNASSIGNED: After complex ASD surgery, significant improvement in PROs were seen at 5-years postoperative in ODI, SF36-PCS/MCS, SRS-22r, and NRS-back/leg pain. No significant changes in PROs occurred during the 2 to 5-year postoperative period. Those with major surgery-related complications had similar PROs and proportion of patients achieving MCID as those without these complications.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) have been widely accepted in western countries. However, limited attention has been given to PROs in China due to a lack of research on the agreement between doctors\' and patients\' reports of adverse events. This study aims to reveal the perception gap of chemotherapy-induced adverse events between doctors and cancer patients in China.
METHODS: An observational study was administered at Sun Yat-Sen University Cancer Center (SYSUCC). Totally, 200 adult cancer patients undergoing chemotherapy participated. Patient reports were collected by nurses via telephone. Doctor reports were collected by nurses based on their medical records. The agreement between doctors and patients was analyzed by Cohen\'s κ.
RESULTS: Agreement between doctors and patients varied among different symptoms: 0.26 for nausea/vomiting, 0.49 for constipation, 0.63 for diarrhea, 0.65 for general pain, and 0.76 for rash. Doctors\' underreporting rates were 70% for nausea/vomiting, 50% for diarrhea, 38% for rash, 33% for constipation, and 29% for general pain.
CONCLUSIONS: The perception gap of chemotherapy-induced adverse events between doctors and patients exists in China, especially regarding subjective symptoms. Introduction of PROs in both clinical trials and routine clinical practice should be considered in China.

Women with endometrial or cervical cancer at risk for recurrence receive postoperative radiation therapy (RT). A patient reported outcomes (PRO) instrument to assess bowel and urinary toxicities is the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index Composite (EPIC), which has been validated in men with prostate cancer. As this instrument specifically measures bowel toxicity and the degree to which this is a problem, it was used in NRG Oncology/RTOG 1203 to compare intensity modulated RT (IMRT) to standard RT. This paper reports on the expanded validation of EPIC for use in women receiving pelvic RT.
In addition to the EPIC bowel domain, urinary toxicity (EPIC urinary domain), patient reported bowel toxicities (PRO-CTCAE) and quality of life (Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy (FACT)) were completed before, during and after treatment. Sensitivity, reliability and concurrent validity were assessed.
Mean bowel and urinary scores among 278 women enrolled were significantly worse during treatment and differed between groups. Acceptable to good reliability for bowel and urinary domain scores were obtained at all time points with the exception of one at baseline. Correlations between function and bother scores within the bowel and urinary domains were consistently stronger than those across domains. Correlations between bowel domain scores and PRO-CTCAE during treatment were stronger than those with the FACT.
Correlations within and among the instruments indicate EPIC bowel and urinary domains are measuring conceptually discrete components of health. These EPIC domains are valid, reliable and sensitive instruments to measure PRO among women undergoing pelvic radiation.