Patient Reported Outcomes

患者报告的结果
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:国际血液和骨髓移植研究中心(CIBMTR)准备了一套年度总结幻灯片,以详细说明移植和细胞疗法的趋势。在2023年的总结幻灯片中,CIBMTR纳入了接受嵌合抗原受体T细胞(CAR-T)输注的患者的数据。此外,还包括患者报告结局(PRO)的数据.
    目的:本报告旨在更新美国HCT活性的年度趋势,并纳入有关CAR-T疗法使用的数据。在这里,我们还旨在介绍和描述发展,实施,以及PRO数据收集的当前状态。
    方法:2020年8月,CIBMTR启动了收集患者报告结果数据的方案(CIBMTRPRO方案)。TheCIBMTRPRO协议在集中式基础设施下运行,以减轻中心的负担。具体来说,PRO数据是从成人HCT和CAR-T患者的前瞻性便利样本中收集的,这些患者在贡献中心接受治疗并同意进行研究。数据与临床数据合并并存储,并在CIBMTR研究数据库协议的管理下使用。参与者回答了由患者报告结果测量信息系统©(PROMIS)开发的一系列调查,重点是身体,社会和情感,和其他评估财务状况的措施,职业功能,和健康的社会决定因素。为了补充传统测量的临床结果,调查在常规收集临床数据的相同时间点进行.
    结果:截至2023年9月,已收集了来自25个不同中心的993名患者的PRO数据。为了将这些重要的患者观点纳入标准的临床护理,CIBMTR已将PRO数据添加到数据回传中心(DBtC)。通过扩展注册表中表示的数据类型,CIBMTR旨在支持整体研究,以改善患者预后。
    结论:CIBMTR的PRO数据旨在为未来大规模发展提供基础,人口层面的评估,以确定需要改进的领域,在获取和健康结果方面出现的差距(例如,按年龄,种族,和种族),以及可能影响当前治疗指南的新疗法。继续收集和增长PRO数据对于理解这些变化和确定改善患者生活质量的方法至关重要。
    BACKGROUND: Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) prepares an annual set of summary slides to detail the trends in transplantation and cellular therapies. For the first time in the 2023 summary slides, CIBMTR incorporates data for patients receiving chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) infusions. In addition, the data on patient-reported outcomes (PROs) is also included.
    OBJECTIVE: This report aims to update the annual trends in US HCT activity and incorporate data on the use of CAR-T therapies. Here we also aim to present and describe the development, implementation, and current status of the PRO data collection.
    METHODS: In August 2020, CIBMTR launched the Protocol for Collection of Patient Reported Outcomes Data (CIBMTR PRO Protocol). The CIBMTR PRO Protocol operates under a centralized infrastructure to reduce burden to centers. Specifically, PRO data is collected from a prospective convenience sample of adult HCT and CAR-T patients who received treatment at contributing centers and consented for research. Data are merged and stored with the clinical data and used under the governance of the CIBMTR Research Database Protocol. Participants answer a series of surveys developed by the Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System© (PROMIS) focusing on physical, social and emotional, and others measures assessing financial well-being, occupational functioning, and social determinants of health. To complement traditionally measured clinical outcomes, the surveys are administered at the same timepoints that clinical data is routinely collected.
    RESULTS: As of September 2023, PRO data from 993 patients across 25 different centers has been collected. With the goal of incorporating these important patient perspectives into standard clinical care, CIBMTR has added the PRO data to Data Back to Centers (DBtC). Through expanding the data types represented in the registry, CIBMTR aims to support holistic research accounting for the patient perspective in improving patient outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: PRO data at CIBMTR aims to provide the foundation for future large scale, population-level evaluations to determine areas for improvement, emerging disparities in access and health outcomes (eg, by age, race, and ethnicity), and new therapies that may impact current treatment guidelines. Continuing to collect and grow the PRO data is critical for understanding these changes and identifying methods for improving patient quality of life.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    烧伤重建结果是一个越来越多的调查领域。尽管有证据表明激光治疗后疤痕特征的物理改善,关于患者报告结果的信息很少.这项研究的目的是比较有和没有激光治疗的烧伤幸存者的患者报告结果。该研究包括烧伤模型系统国家数据库中一个中心的参与者;将接受烧伤疤痕门诊激光治疗的参与者与未接受激光治疗的烧伤幸存者进行比较。检查了以下结果:对生活量表的满意度,退伍军人兰德调查的心理和身体成分摘要,和PROMIS疼痛强度量表。回归分析在12个月和24个月时检查了激光治疗与每个结果之间的关联。研究人群包括287名成年烧伤幸存者(65名激光组,222对照组)。两组之间的显着差异包括:烧伤大小(激光:14.9,13.5SD,对照:8.9,11.1SD;p<0.001),保险类型(p=0.036),吸入性损伤(激光:17.2%,对照:2.7%;p<0.001),和呼吸机要求(激光:27.7%,控制:13.5%;p=0.013)。在两个随访时间点,激光治疗与任何结果无关。需要进一步的研究来开发患者报告的结果指标,这些指标对接受激光治疗的烧伤幸存者所经历的临床变化更敏感。
    Burn reconstruction outcomes are an area of growing investigation. Although there is evidence of measured physical improvements in scar characteristics after laser treatment, there is little information on patient reported outcomes. The purpose of this study is to compare patient reported outcomes between burn survivors with and without laser treatment. The study included participants in the Burn Model Systems National Database at a single center; participants that received outpatient laser treatment for burn scars were compared to a matched group of burn survivors that did not receive laser. The following outcomes were examined: Satisfaction With Life Scale, Mental and Physical Component Summary of the Veterans Rand Survey, and the PROMIS Pain Intensity Scale. Regression analyses examined the associations between laser treatment and each outcome at 12 and 24 months. The study population included 287 adult burn survivors (65 laser group, 222 control group). The significant differences found between the two groups included: burn size (laser: 14.9, 13.5 SD, control: 8.9, 11.1 SD; p<0.001), insurance type (p=0.036), inhalation injury (laser: 17.2%, control: 2.7%; p<0.001), and ventilator requirement (laser: 27.7%, control: 13.5%; p=0.013). Laser treatment was not associated with any of the outcomes at both follow-up time points. Further research is needed to develop patient reported outcome measures that are more sensitive to the clinical changes experienced by burn survivors receiving laser treatment.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:慢性瘙痒是一种临床上异质性的症状,表现为不同的持续时间,强度,或质量。迄今为止,没有经过验证的德语工具可以系统地评估相关参数。在瘙痒研究工作组(ArbeitsgemeinschaftPruritusforschung,AGP),2008年制定了慢性瘙痒评估问卷(AGP问卷).随后修订的文书,现在称为德国瘙痒问卷,记录瘙痒的具体参数,如定位,当然,强度和质量,关于总体健康状况的记忆数据,社会人口统计数据,生活质量,和应对方法。这将在这里提出的研究中得到验证。
    方法:问卷用于366名来自德国的不同病因的慢性瘙痒患者(海德堡大学医院,明斯特,美因茨,Erlangen,吉森,私人实践BadBentheim,慕尼黑工业大学,威斯巴登肾脏中心),奥地利(格拉茨大学医院)和瑞士(阿劳州医院)。
    结果:关于本地化的重复完成的可靠性(重新测试可靠性),第一次出现,和伴随疾病的Cohen\skappa值很高(>0.8)。瘙痒特征的重测可靠性数据显示较低的值(<0.7)。关于实际相关变化的可测量性(变化灵敏度),发现中等到强效应大小(0.09-0.19)。不可能根据记录的参数对瘙痒病因进行统计学上的显着区分。
    结论:德国瘙痒问卷允许对患者和临床医生报告的全面和结构化记录,不同病因慢性瘙痒的相关维度。计划进一步适应和发展。
    BACKGROUND: Chronic pruritus is a clinically heterogeneous symptom that manifests itself with varying duration, intensity, or quality. To date, there is no validated German-language instrument that systematically assesses the relevant parameters. With the support of the Pruritus Research Working Group (Arbeitsgemeinschaft Pruritusforschung, AGP), a questionnaire for the assessment of chronic pruritus (AGP questionnaire) was developed in 2008. The subsequently revised instrument, now called the German Pruritus Questionnaire, records pruritus-specific parameters such as localization, course, intensity and quality, anamnestic data on the general state of health, sociodemographic data, quality of life, and coping methods. It is to be validated in the study presented here.
    METHODS: The questionnaire was used in 366 patients with chronic pruritus of different etiologies from Germany (University Hospitals Heidelberg, Münster, Mainz, Erlangen, Giessen, private practice Bad Bentheim, TU Munich, Wiesbaden Kidney Center), Austria (Graz University Hospital) and Switzerland (Aarau Cantonal Hospital).
    RESULTS: The reliability for repeated completion (retest reliability) with regard to localization, first occurrence, and concomitant diseases showed high values for Cohen\'s kappa (> 0.8). The data on the retest reliability of the pruritus characteristics showed lower values (< 0.7). With regard to the measurability of practically relevant changes (change sensitivity), medium to strong effect sizes were found (0.09-0.19). A statistically significant differentiation of the pruritus etiologies based on the recorded parameters was not possible.
    CONCLUSIONS: The German Pruritus Questionnaire allows a comprehensive and structured recording of patient- and clinician-reported, relevant dimensions of chronic pruritus of different etiologies. Further adaptation and development are planned.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • DOI:
    文章类型: Journal Article
    后踝受累会严重影响患者的预后。文献支持使用术前计算机断层扫描(CT)来评估后踝骨折的形态。这项研究的目的是确定术前CT是否与手术时间的显着改善有关,术后并发症,三踝骨折的再手术率。还要求外科医生在术前完成有关使用CT扫描来评估效用的调查。
    对2018-2020年间接受手术固定的三踝骨折成人患者进行回顾性分析。主要结果包括手术时间,术后并发症,和再操作。次要结果是存在后踝固定。对15名进行踝关节ORIF的外科医生进行了调查,以获得有关为什么或为什么不进行术前CT扫描的信息。
    共288例三踝骨折患者,术前CT扫描94例(32.6%)。患者年龄无显著差异,性别,BMI,术前进行CT扫描和未进行CT扫描的组之间的吸烟状况.组间AO/OTA分类无显著差异。在接受术前CT的组中,平均手术时间明显更高(114没有CT与145带CT,p<0.05)。并发症(10.3%无CTvs7.4%有CT,p=0.55)和再次手术(6.7%无CT与7.4%的CT,p=0.16)组间没有显着差异。两组间后踝固定率无显著差异(43.8%无CT对比39.4%有CT;p=0.52)。在接受调查的外科医生中,87%的人报告他们没有常规进行三踝骨折的术前CT扫描。术前扫描的最常见原因是决定入路/定位,评估影响,确定后踝的大小.
    尽管三分之一的手术性三踝骨折患者在术前进行了CT扫描,我们没有发现手术时间的改善,并发症,再操作。证据等级:III。
    UNASSIGNED: Posterior malleolar involvement can drastically affect patient outcomes. Literature has supported the use of preoperative Computed Tomography (CT) to assess posterior malleolar fracture morphology. The purpose of this study is to determine whether preoperative CT is associated with significant improvement in surgical time, postoperative complications, reoperation rates in trimalleolar ankle fractures. Surgeons were also asked to complete survey regarding use of CT scans to gauge utility preoperatively.
    UNASSIGNED: Adult patients with trimalleolar ankle fractures who underwent operative fixation between 2018-2020 were retrospectively reviewed. Primary outcomes included surgical time, postoperative complications, and reoperations. Secondary outcome was presence of posterior malleolar fixation. 15 surgeons who performed ankle ORIF were surveyed to gain information regarding why or why not preoperative CT scan was obtained.
    UNASSIGNED: 288 patients with trimalleolar ankle fractures were included, 94 had preoperative CT scans (32.6%). No significant differences found in patient age, gender, BMI, smoking status between the groups that did and did not have preoperative CT scan. No significant differences were observed in AO/OTA classification between groups. Average surgical time was significantly higher in group that received a preoperative CT (114 without CT vs. 145 with CT, p<0.05). Complications (10.3% no CT vs 7.4% with CT, p=0.55) and reoperations (6.7% without CT vs. 7.4% with CT, p=0.16) not significantly different between groups. No significant difference was observed in rate of posterior malleolus fixation between groups (43.8% without CT vs 39.4% with CT; p=0.52). Of surveyed surgeons, 87% reported they don\'t routinely obtain preoperative CT scan for trimalleolar ankle fractures. Most common reasons for preoperative scans were deciding on approach/positioning, assessing for impaction, determining the size of the posterior malleolus.
    UNASSIGNED: Although preoperative CT scans are obtained in one third of patients with operative trimalleolar ankle fractures, we did not find an improvement in surgical time, complications, and reoperation. Level of Evidence: III.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:行为健康中基于测量的护理使用患者报告的结果测量(PROMs)来筛查心理健康症状和药物使用,并评估症状随时间的变化。虽然PROM越来越多地集成到电子健康记录系统中并以电子方式管理,纸质PROM继续使用。尚不清楚当PROM最初开发用于电子管理时,在纸上管理PROM是否可行。
    目的:本研究旨在检查患者自行服用2部分物质使用筛查剂的可行性-烟草,酒精,处方药,和其他物质(TAPS)-在纸上。该筛选器最初是为电子管理而开发的。它从有限数量的问题开始,并根据个人的回答跳过或反射到其他问题。在这项研究中,由于城市健康安全网医院的紧急护理行为健康诊所的电子管理障碍,TAPS适用于纸质使用.
    方法:从2021年8月到2022年3月,研究人员收集了未识别的TAPS论文回答,并跟踪TAPS完成率和对问卷说明的依从性。随后进行了回顾性图表审查,以获取2021年8月至2022年3月期间到诊所就诊的患者的人口统计学信息。由于从TAPS响应中收集的初始信息被取消识别,人口统计信息与研究人员跟踪的单个TAPS筛查员没有关联.
    结果:共有507例新患者在临床就诊,平均年龄为38.7(SD16.6)岁。总之,258例(50.9%)患者为男性。他们主要是黑人(n=212,41.8%),白色(n=152,30%),非西班牙裔或非拉丁裔(n=403,79.5%)。大多数患者是公共保险(n=411,81.1%)。在这507名患者中,313(61.7%)完成了TAPS筛选。在这313名患者中,76(24.3%)遵守说明,237(75.7%)未正确遵循说明。在237名没有正确遵循指示的受访者中,166(70%)回答了更多问题,而71(30%)回答了比TAPS第2部分要求的更少的问题。在237名不遵守问卷指导的患者中,44(18.6%)的回应方式与他们在筛选器的第1部分中的回应相矛盾,并最终影响了他们的整体TAPS得分。
    结论:在最初为电子用途开发的纸上填写物质使用筛选器时,患者遵守问卷说明是具有挑战性的。选择基于测量的护理的PROM时,重要的是要考虑问卷的结构以及如何管理PROM,以确定是否需要实施对PROM自我管理的额外支持。
    BACKGROUND: Measurement-based care in behavioral health uses patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) to screen for mental health symptoms and substance use and to assess symptom change over time. While PROMs are increasingly being integrated into electronic health record systems and administered electronically, paper-based PROMs continue to be used. It is unclear if it is feasible to administer a PROM on paper when the PROM was initially developed for electronic administration.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine the feasibility of patient self-administration of a 2-part substance use screener-the Tobacco, Alcohol, Prescription medications, and other Substances (TAPS)-on paper. This screener was originally developed for electronic administration. It begins with a limited number of questions and branches to either skip or reflex to additional questions based on an individual\'s responses. In this study, the TAPS was adapted for paper use due to barriers to electronic administration within an urgent care behavioral health clinic at an urban health safety net hospital.
    METHODS: From August 2021 to March 2022, research staff collected deidentified paper TAPS responses and tracked TAPS completion rates and adherence to questionnaire instructions. A retrospective chart review was subsequently conducted to obtain demographic information for the patients who presented to the clinic between August 2021 and March 2022. Since the initial information collected from TAPS responses was deidentified, demographic information was not linked to the individual TAPS screeners that were tracked by research staff.
    RESULTS: A total of 507 new patients were seen in the clinic with a mean age of 38.7 (SD 16.6) years. In all, 258 (50.9%) patients were male. They were predominantly Black (n=212, 41.8%), White (n=152, 30%), and non-Hispanic or non-Latino (n=403, 79.5%). Most of the patients were publicly insured (n=411, 81.1%). Among these 507 patients, 313 (61.7%) completed the TAPS screener. Of these 313 patients, 76 (24.3%) adhered to the instructions and 237 (75.7%) did not follow the instructions correctly. Of the 237 respondents who did not follow the instructions correctly, 166 (70%) answered more questions and 71 (30%) answered fewer questions than required in TAPS part 2. Among the 237 patients who did not adhere to questionnaire instructions, 44 (18.6%) responded in a way that contradicted their response in part 1 of the screener and ultimately affected their overall TAPS score.
    CONCLUSIONS: It was challenging for patients to adhere to questionnaire instructions when completing a substance use screener on paper that was originally developed for electronic use. When selecting PROMs for measurement-based care, it is important to consider the structure of the questionnaire and how the PROM will be administered to determine if additional support for PROM self-administration needs to be implemented.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    2016年建立了分析患者报告结果和生活质量终点数据的国际标准(SISAQOL)计划,以评估晚期乳腺癌随机对照试验(RCT)中患者报告结果(PRO)数据分析的质量和标准化。该计划发现了PRO数据报告中的缺陷,包括处理缺失数据的非标准化方法。这项研究评估了日本癌症RCT中与健康相关的生活质量(HRQOL)的报告,以提供对日本PRO报告状况的见解。该研究回顾了PubMed从2010年到2018年发表的文章。符合条件的研究包括日本癌症RCT,其中50名成人患者(日本人≥50%)接受抗癌治疗的实体瘤。评价标准包括HRQOL假设的清晰度,多重性测试,主要分析方法,并报告有临床意义的差异。确定了27项HRQOL试验。只有15%的人提供了明确的HRQOL假设,63%的人检查了多个HRQOL域,没有调整多重性。基于模型的方法是主要HRQOL分析最常见的统计方法。只有22%的试验明确报告了HRQOL的临床意义差异。大多数试验都报告了基线评估,但只有26%的人报告了治疗组之间的比较.HRQOL分析基于19%的试验中的意向治疗人群,74%的人在后续行动中报告合规;然而,41%的人没有指定如何处理缺失值。尽管报告临床假设和临床意义差异的比率相对较低,日本癌症RCT中HRQOL评估的现状似乎与以前的研究相当.
    The Setting International Standards in Analyzing Patient-Reported Outcomes and Quality of Life Endpoints Data (SISAQOL) initiative was established in 2016 to assess the quality and standardization of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) data analysis in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) on advanced breast cancer. The initiative identified deficiencies in PRO data reporting, including nonstandardized methods for handling missing data. This study evaluated the reporting of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in Japanese cancer RCTs to provide insights into the state of PRO reporting in Japan. The study reviewed PubMed articles published from 2010 to 2018. Eligible studies included Japanese cancer RCTs with ≥50 adult patients (≥50% were Japanese) with solid tumors receiving anticancer treatments. The evaluation criteria included clarity of the HRQOL hypotheses, multiplicity testing, primary analysis methods, and reporting of clinically meaningful differences. Twenty-seven HRQOL trials were identified. Only 15% provided a clear HRQOL hypothesis, and 63% examined multiple HRQOL domains without adjusting for multiplicity. Model-based methods were the most common statistical methods for the primary HRQOL analysis. Only 22% of the trials explicitly reported clinically meaningful differences in HRQOL. Baseline assessments were reported in most trials, but only 26% reported comparisons between the treatment groups. HRQOL analysis was based on the intention-to-treat population in 19% of the trials, and 74% reported compliance at follow-up; however, 41% did not specify how missing values were handled. Although the rates of reporting clinical hypotheses and clinically meaningful differences were relatively low, the current state of HRQOL evaluation in the Japanese cancer RCT appears comparable to that of previous studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:与转移性激素受体阳性(HR+)乳腺癌(MBC)患者相比,早期乳腺癌(EBC)患者早期停止内分泌治疗(ET)的比例更高。在我们的临床经验中,其原因可能包括影响EBC患者生活质量(QOL)的ET副作用的重大负担。我们假设在ET上,HR+EBC患者的QOL低于HR+MBC患者。
    方法:我们进行了一项横断面观察性研究,利用FACT-ES和EORTCQLQC30工具,在5家爱尔兰医院接受ET的EBC和MBC患者中评估QOL。
    结果:共纳入417例患者-EBC(79%n=331)和MBC21%(n=86)。使用FACT-ES,我们发现不同阶段的总体生活质量没有差异(139.2vs141,P=.33)。与HR+EBC相比,HR+MBC患者的ET症状负担较低(61.4vs54,P<0.01)。在调整后的多元线性回归模型中,接受ET的EBC和MBC患者的生活质量没有差异。
    结论:EBC和MBC患者的总体生活质量无显著差异。然而,EBC患者出现更多的内分泌症状。在调整后的多元线性回归模型中,阶段没有预测QOL。我们的结果表明,内分泌症状是EBC患者QOL受损的重要原因,但其他QOL决定因素的作用(例如,阶段)不太清楚。未来的工作可能包括开发特定阶段的QOL工具和利用电子患者报告的结果(ePROs)来识别和管理紧急毒性。
    BACKGROUND: Early discontinuation of endocrine therapy (ET) is higher among patients with early breast cancer (EBC) compared to patients with metastatic hormone receptor-positive (HR+) breast cancer (MBC). In our clinical experience the reasons for this may include a significant burden of ET side effects impacting quality of life (QOL) in patients with EBC.  We hypothesized that QOL is lower in patients with HR + EBC compared to patients with HR + MBC on ET.
    METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional observational study to assess QOL utilizing FACT-ES & EORTC QLQ C30 tools among patients with EBC and MBC receiving ET across 5 Irish hospitals.
    RESULTS: A total of 417 patients were enrolled-EBC (79% n = 331) and MBC 21% (n = 86). Using the FACT-ES, we found no difference in overall QOL by stage (139.2 vs 141, P  = .33). Patients with HR + MBC had a lower symptom burden from ET compared to HR + EBC (61.4 vs 54, P < .01). In adjusted multivariate linear regression models, there was no difference in QOL for patients with EBC and MBC receiving ET.
    CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in overall QOL for patients with EBC and MBC. However, patients with EBC experienced more endocrine symptoms. In adjusted multivariate linear regression models, the stage did not predict QOL. Our results suggest that endocrine symptoms are significant contributors to impaired QOL for patients with EBC but the role of other determinants of QOL (eg, stage) is less clear. Future work could include the development of stage-specific QOL tools and utilization of electronic patient-reported outcomes (ePROs) to identify and manage emergent toxicities.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    由于定量措施的不足,将以人为本的结果纳入神经退行性疾病的临床试验具有挑战性。同时,个人有意义的治疗目标在临床实践中的整合仍然是定性的,未能真正为评估提供信息,治疗干预和纵向监测和支持。我们讨论了捕获个性化大脑健康结果的当前进展和未来方向,并提出了一种以可扩展方式整合以人为本的结果的方法。我们的方法源于基于证据的电子个人特定结果度量(ePSOM)计划,该计划提示个人定义个人有意义的治疗优先级,并报告管理对个人最重要的项目的信心水平(例如,\“我对自己的对话能力有信心吗?”)。部署为单一版本(仅限个人)或二重版本(个人和护理合作伙伴),我们提出的工具可以用作临床试验的终点,提供有意义的干预益处的证据,并在临床实践中,通过为个体寻求的治疗目标建立锚。
    Incorporating person-centered outcomes into clinical trials for neurodegenerative diseases has been challenging due to a deficiency in quantitative measures. Meanwhile, the integration of personally meaningful treatment targets in clinical practice remains qualitative, failing to truly inform evaluations, therapeutic interventions and longitudinal monitoring and support. We discuss the current advances and future directions in capturing individualized brain health outcomes and present an approach to integrate person-centered outcome in a scalable manner. Our approach stems from the evidence-based electronic Person-Specific Outcome Measure (ePSOM) program which prompts an individual to define personally meaningful treatment priorities and report level of confidence in managing items that matter to the individual the most (e.g., \"Do I feel confident in my ability to contribute to a conversation?\"). Deployed either as a single version (person only) or a dyad version (person and care partner), our proposed tool could be used as an endpoint in clinical trials, offering proof of meaningful intervention benefits and in clinical practice, by establishing an anchor for the therapeutic objectives sought by the individual.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定使用白介素17或23抑制剂治疗的成年中度/重度斑块状银屑病患者在生活质量方面的有效性,并确定相关因素。
    方法:横断面观察性研究,包括被诊断为中度/重度斑块状银屑病的成年患者,接受白介素17或23抑制剂治疗至少12或16周的随访,分别。
    结果:包括41例患者:65%为男性,中位年龄54岁(SD=13)。纳入的患者使用ixekizumab治疗35%,guselkumab25%,苏金单抗17.5%,brodalumab15%,和risankizumab7.5%。Psoariasis面积严重程度指数(PASI)降低94.6%(RIC76.8-100%),DLQI为1(RIC0-2.75),DLQI≤160%。受影响最大的健康方面是症状和感知(57.5%),日常生活活动(27.5%),和治疗引起的不适(17.5%)。DLQI得分<1与人口统计之间没有关联,合并症,和治疗相关变量。DLQI<1的患者的PASI中位数降低优于DLQI>1的患者(100%vs90.2%,p=.025)。
    结论:使用白介素17或23抑制剂治疗的中度/重度斑块状银屑病患者根据临床实践指南建议(DLQI问卷得分≤1,PASI指数降低90-100%)并根据最近的荟萃分析和现实生活研究的结果,达到了达到目标设定的足够治疗目标。在达到生活质量目标的组中,观察到PASI指数降低幅度更大,在评估治疗效果时,有可能使用患者报告的结局.
    OBJECTIVE: To determine the effectiveness in terms of quality of life perceived by adult patients with moderate/severe plaque psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 or 23 inhibitors and to identify associated factors.
    METHODS: Cross-sectional observational study including adult patients diagnosed with moderate/severe plaque psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 or 23 inhibitors for at least 12 or 16 weeks in follow-up, respectively.
    RESULTS: Forty-one patients were included: 65% male, median age 54 years (SD=13). The included patients were treated with ixekizumab 35%, guselkumab 25%, secukinumab 17.5%, brodalumab 15%, and risankizumab 7.5%. Psoariasis area severity index (PASI) reduction was 94.6% (RIC 76.8-100%), DLQI of 1 (RIC 0-2.75), DLQI≤1 60%. The most affected health dimensions were symptoms and perceptions (57.5%), activities of daily living (27.5%), and discomfort caused with treatment (17.5%). No association was found between DLQI score <1 and demographic, comorbidities, and treatment-related variables. The median PASI reduction in patients with DLQI<1 was superior to patients with DLQI>1 (100% vs 90.2%, p=.025).
    CONCLUSIONS: Patients with moderate/severe plaque psoriasis treated with interleukin 17 or 23 inhibitors achieve adequate therapeutic targets achieving the target set according to clinical practice guideline recommendations (score ≤1 on the DLQI questionnaire and 90-100% reduction in the PASI index) and in accordance with the results of recent meta-analyses and real-life studies. A greater reduction of the PASI index is observed in the group reaching the quality of life target, there being the possibility of using patient-reported outcomes in the evaluation of treatment effectiveness.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    为了评估可接受性,保留,以及面对面干预的有效性,纳入教育和动机性访谈(MI),以支持复发缓解型多发性硬化症(PwRRMS)患者,并提高自我报告的药物依从性。
    PwRRMS(N=60)规定的疾病改变治疗(DMT),他们被认定为非坚持者,并同意参与干预,接受了他们主治医生的口头教育和咨询,通过与健康心理学家的电话进行量身定制的MI咨询和加强会议,以及六个月后的最后MI咨询。每个PwRRMS在基线时填充了一系列患者报告的结果(PRO),6个月和12个月后.该设计是为期一年的准实验前测后测。
    在60名同意注册的人中,52人完成干预,46人完成随访。基线后六个月,依从性评分增加(中位数=12.0),与基线相比差异显著(中位数=10.0,p=0.030).尽管如此,随访12个月时,报告的依从性与基线无显著差异(中位数=11.0,p=0.106).
    这项研究证明了PwRRMS联合心理教育和MI方案的合理保留和初始疗效,以增强对DMT的药物依从性。为了保持变化,需要更持久的干预。
    这项研究的重点是患有复发缓解型多发性硬化症(PwRRMS)的人,他们不坚持他们的处方药。在确定非信徒身份后,为PwRRMS提供了干预措施以提高其依从性。这项研究调查了有多少被确定的人同意参加干预,有多少人留在干预中,以及干预措施在自我报告的依从性方面是否有效。干预措施包括口头教育和治疗医生的咨询,紧随其后的是心理学家量身定制的咨询。通过电话与心理学家进行了一次助推器会议,以及六个月后的总结咨询会议。在初次咨询后,对参与者进行了一年的随访。三分之二的PWMS被确定为非坚持同意注册(n=60),52人完成干预,46人完成随访。咨询后六个月,自我报告的依从性得分显着增加,但在12个月随访时,报告的依从性与基线无显著差异.为了保持变化,需要更持久的干预。
    UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the acceptability, retention, and efficacy of face-to-face intervention, incorporating education and Motivational Interviewing (MI) to support persons with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (PwRRMS) and increase self-reported medication adherence.
    UNASSIGNED: PwRRMS (N = 60) prescribed Disease Modifying Treatment (DMT), who were identified as non-adherent and consented to participate in an intervention, received verbal education and counseling from their treating physician, a tailored MI counseling and a booster session via telephone with a health psychologist, and a concluding MI counseling six months later. Each PwRRMS filled a battery of patient-reported outcomes (PROs) at baseline, six and 12 months later. The design was a quasi-experimental pre-test post-test across a year.
    UNASSIGNED: Of the sixty identified persons who consented to enroll, 52 completed the intervention and 46 completed the follow-up. At six months following the baseline, adherence scores increased (median = 12.0) and were significantly different than at baseline (median=10.0, p = 0.030). Still, at 12 months follow-up there was no significant difference from baseline in reported adherence (median = 11.0, p = 0.106).
    UNASSIGNED: This study demonstrated reasonable retention and initial efficacy of a combined psycho-education and MI protocol for PwRRMS to enhance medication adherence to DMT. To maintain the change, a more sustained intervention is required.
    The study focused on persons with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (PwRRMS) who do not adhere to their prescribed medication. Following the identification of non-adherent persons, PwRRMS were offered an intervention to increase their adherence. The study examined how many of those identified consented to enroll in the intervention, how many remained in the intervention, and whether the intervention was efficacious in terms of self-reported adherence. The intervention included verbal education and counseling from the treating physician, immediately followed by tailored counseling by a psychologist. There was a booster session via telephone with the psychologist, and a concluding counseling meeting six months later. Participants were followed for a year after the initial counseling. Two-thirds of PWMS identified as non-adherent consented to enroll (n = 60), 52 completed the intervention and 46 completed the follow-up. At six months following counseling, self-reported adherence scores significantly increased, but at 12 months follow-up there was no significant difference from baseline in reported adherence. To maintain the change, a more sustained intervention is required.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号