OBJECTIVE: Metastatic pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is an aggressive cancer with generally poor outcomes. Effective methods for predicting survival in patients with metastatic LCNEC are needed. This study aimed to identify independent survival predictors and develop nomograms for predicting survival in patients with metastatic LCNEC.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, identifying patients with metastatic LCNEC diagnosed between 2010 and 2017. To find independent predictors of cancer-specific survival (CSS), we performed Cox regression analysis. A nomogram was developed to predict the 6-, 12-, and 18-month CSS rates of patients with metastatic LCNEC. The concordance index (C-index), area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC), and calibration curves were adopted with the aim of assessing whether the model can be discriminative and reliable. Decision curve analyses (DCAs) were used to assess the model\'s utility and benefits from a clinical perspective.
RESULTS: This study enrolled a total of 616 patients, of whom 432 were allocated to the training cohort and 184 to the validation cohort. Age, T staging, N staging, metastatic sites, radiotherapy, and chemotherapy were identified as independent prognostic factors for patients with metastatic LCNEC based on multivariable Cox regression analysis results. The nomogram showed strong performance with C-index values of 0.733 and 0.728 for the training and validation cohorts, respectively. ROC curves indicated good predictive performance of the model, with AUC values of 0.796, 0.735, and 0.736 for predicting the 6-, 12-, and 18-month CSS rates of patients with metastatic LCNEC in the training cohort, and 0.795, 0.801, and 0.780 in the validation cohort, respectively. Calibration curves and DCAs confirmed the nomogram\'s reliability and clinical utility.
CONCLUSIONS: The new nomogram was developed for predicting CSS in patients with metastatic LCNEC, providing personalized risk evaluation and aiding clinical decision-making.

BACKGROUND: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the bladder is a rare non-urothelial tumor of the bladder. The treatment of LCNEC of the bladder is different from that of urothelial carcinoma (UC); therefore, early and accurate diagnosis is particularly important. As LCNEC of the bladder is rare and its clinical symptoms and radiographic features are similar to those of urothelial tumors, the clinical diagnosis of the disease remains challenging.
METHODS: We report a 72-year-old female patient who presented with gross hematuria for 3 mo. A solitary tumor located in the anterior wall of the bladder was found by cystoscopy. Pathological examination after biopsy suggested UC of the bladder in the absence of immunohistochemical assessment. The patient underwent partial cystectomy and was finally diagnosed with LCNEC (pT2bN0M0) based on the results of postoperative immunohistochemical examination. During the 10-mo follow-up, no signs of tumor recurrence or metastasis were found.
CONCLUSIONS: Immunohistochemical examination is essential for diagnosing LCNEC of the bladder. Accurate diagnosis and multidisciplinary treatment in the early stage of the disease are crucial for improving the prognosis.

Endometrial large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a highly malignant tumor that presents with neuroendocrine function. It is difficult to diagnose at an early stage. Moreover, the diagnosis depends on the pathological and immunohistochemical findings. It is also prone to distant metastasis, but is difficult to treat and shows poor prognosis. Presently, there exists no unified treatment plan, and the prognosis of this disease is also poor. We reported here an analysis and literature review of a case of endometrial LCNEC to facilitate the comprehension of this disease and provide help toward clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Lung cancer incidence and mortality rates are increasing worldwide, posing a significant public health challenge and an immense burden to affected families. Lung cancer encompasses distinct subtypes, namely, non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small-cell lung cancer (SCLC). In clinical investigations, researchers have observed that neuroendocrine tumors can be classified into four types: typical carcinoid, atypical carcinoid, small-cell carcinoma, and large-cell neuroendocrine carcinoma based on their unique features. However, there exist combined forms of neuroendocrine cancer. This study focuses specifically on combined pulmonary carcinomas with a neuroendocrine component. In this comprehensive review article, the authors provide an overview of combined lung cancers and present two pathological images to visually depict these distinctive subtypes.

Pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a highly aggressive neoplasm with biological heterogeneity. Mutations in multiple genes have been identified in LCNEC. However, associations between gene alterations, histopathological characteristics, and prognosis remain ambiguous. Here, we investigated the clinicopathologic, immunohistochemical, and genomic characteristics of 19 patients with LCNEC and 9 patients with atypical carcinoid (AC). We revealed high mutation frequencies of TP53 (89.5 %), RB1 (42.1 %), APC (31.6 %), and MCL1 (31.6 %) in LCNEC, while genetic alterations were rarely found in AC. APC alterations mainly occurred to the exon 16 and were only identified in LCNEC with wild-type RB1. The 19 LCNEC were further subgrouped into APC wild-type (LCNEC-APCMT, 6/19) and APC-mutated (LCNEC-APCWT, 13/19) subgroups. In comparison with LCNEC-APCWT, LCNEC-APCMT displayed lower TMB (median: 12.64 vs 4.20, P = 0.045), and relatively mild cytologic atypia. In addition, LCNEC-APCMT distinguished itself from AC and LCNEC-APCWT by obviously downregulated expression of neuroendocrine markers (CD56 and Syn, P < 0.01) and significantly altered expression of genes downstream of APC (β-catenin migrating into the cytoplasm and nucleus, P < 0.001; c-Myc upregulating, P = 0.005). The OS of LCNEC-APCMT was numerically intermediate between AC and LCNEC-APCWT. We first proposed that APC alterations were common in LCNEC with wild-type RB1 and that LCNEC-APCMT was associated with lower TMB and better OS in comparison with LCNEC-APCWT.

Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare and highly invasive lung cancer subtype with an overall poor prognosis. Due to its low incidence rate and unusual pathological features, the clinical management of LCNEC remains controversial. The present study aimed to assess the effect of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) on treatment response and survival outcomes in patients with advanced LCNEC. The clinical data from 148 patients with LCNEC treated with ICIs at The First Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University (Zhengzhou, China) between January 2019 and September 2021 were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan-Meier and multivariable Cox regression analyses were used to evaluate associations between clinicopathological variables and patient outcomes. Patients treated with ICIs demonstrated extended median overall survival (mOS) times [23.5 months; 95% confidence interval (CI), 18.524-28.476] compared with patients who did not receive ICIs (11.2 months; 95% CI, 4.530-18.930) (P<0.001). Univariate analysis revealed that histological subtype (P=0.043), lymph node metastases (P=0.032) and number of metastatic organs (P=0.009) were associated with a poor prognosis. The heterogeneity of pathological components was associated with prognosis, and the mOS time was shorter for mixed LCNEC than that for pure LCNEC (P=0.043). The median progression-free survival (mPFS) (9.78 vs. 9.37 months; P=0.82) and mOS (20.70 vs. 25.79 months; P=0.181) times showed no significant association with regard to different regimens of immuno-based combination therapy (chemotherapy combined with ICIs vs. anti-angiogenic agents combined with ICIs). Poor Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score (P=0.04), multiple organ metastases (P=0.02) and high cancer antigen 125 levels (P=0.01) were independent risk factors of a poor prognosis. The present findings offer valuable insights into potential prognostic markers and highlight the favorable impact of ICIs on OS in advanced LCNEC. Prospective clinical studies are required to validate the therapeutic value of ICIs in LCNEC.

暂无摘要。

Acquired resistance is a major problem limiting the clinical efficacy of treatments for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). Histological transformation is an important mechanism underlying the acquired resistance of non-small cell lung cancer and prostate cancer to targeted therapy. However, no report has examined the role of histological transformation in mCRC. Here, we report the first case of histologically transformed large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma from primary colon adenocarcinoma during antiangiogenesis and anti-PD-1 combination therapy. The histologic conversion was confirmed by the observation that the transformed large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma lesion retained the original mutational signature found in the primary tumor. Sequential tumor biopsy and dynamic changes in tumor markers demonstrated the transformed process. The histological transformation not only resulted in discordant responses to the same treatment but also significantly shortened overall survival. This case calls for more attention to histological transformation in mCRC. Tumor rebiopsy upon disease progression and monitoring dynamic changes in tumor markers would help to identify such cases.

Anaplastic lymphoma kinase gene (ALK) rearrangement is present in only approximately 5% of non-small cell lung cancers (NSCLCs) and is scarce in LCNEC patients. The conventional first-line treatment options are chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy or chemotherapy followed by palliative radiotherapy. In this report, we present two cases of metastatic LCNEC with EML4-ALK fusion that were treated with ALK-TKI inhibitors and demonstrated a rapid therapeutic response. Both patients were nonsmoking women who declined cytotoxic chemotherapy, underwent Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS), and confirmed EML4-ALK fusion. They were treated with alectinib as first-line therapy, and the tumors showed significant shrinkage after two months, achieving a PR (defined as a more than 30% decrease in the sum of maximal dimensions). The PFS was 22 months and 32 months, respectively, until the last follow-up. A systematic review of all previously reported cases of LCNEC with ALK mutations identified only 21 cases. These cases were characterized by being female (71.4%), nonsmoking (85.7%), diagnosed at a relatively young age (median age 51.1), and stage IV (89.5%), with an overall response rate (ORR) of 90.5%. PFS and OS were significantly longer than those treated with conventional chemotherapy/immunotherapy. Based on the clinical characteristics and the effective therapeutic outcomes with ALK inhibitors in LCNEC patients with ALK fusion, we recommend routine ALK IHC (economical, affordable, and convenient, but with higher false positives) as a screening method in advanced LCNEC patients, particularly nonsmoking females or those who are not candidates for or unwilling to undergo cytotoxic chemotherapy. Further molecular profiling is necessary to confirm these potential beneficiaries. We suggest TKI inhibitors as the first-line treatment for metastatic LCNEC with ALK fusion. Additional studies on larger cohorts are required to assess the prevalence of ALK gene fusions and their sensitivity to various ALK inhibitors.

暂无摘要。