未经证实:髌骨肌腱病(PT),或者跳线的膝盖,是一种慢性疼痛过度使用髌腱损伤。对于PT,预防比治疗更重要。然而,仍然缺乏强有力的证据来证实预防的有效性。
UNASSIGNED:本研究将通过荟萃分析对高PT风险人群(但无PT)的预防计划在减少PT发生方面的影响。
未经授权:PubMed,Embase,Cochrane图书馆,Scopus,和Ebscohost,从成立到2022年1月11日。
UNASSIGNED:一项研究比较了预防方案和对照对PT风险的影响。在使用搜索词((髌腱病)或(跳膝)或(髌骨肌腱炎)或(髌骨肌腱病)或(髌骨肌腱炎))和((预防*)或(预防*))进行数据库搜索后,共获得1444个项目。其中,有6091名参与者的11项研究符合纳入该荟萃分析的条件。
未经评估:系统评价和荟萃分析。
UNASSIGNED:二级。
UNASSIGNED:第一作者的名字,出版年份,研究设计,国家,人口,平均年龄,性别,预防方案,control,研究持续时间,提取各组PT发生频率或发生率。
UNASSIGNED:共11篇文章纳入分析。总的来说,根据随机效应模型,预防计划组和对照组之间的PT风险没有显着差异(优势比[OR],0.85;95%CI,0.67,1.08;P=0.18)。在新兵分组中,在执行预防后,甚至有增加PT发生风险的趋势(OR,1.89;95%CI,0.68,5.28;P=0.22)。在运动员中,与对照组相比,预防性计划倾向于降低PT的风险(OR,0.81;95%CI,0.63,1.04;P=0.10);然而,差异无统计学意义。试验序贯分析结果表明,预防对运动员仍然有效,但这需要用更大的样本量来证实。
UNASSIGNED:目前的预防方案无法降低PT的风险。然而,对于运动员来说,阴性结果可能是由于样本量不足。
UNASSIGNED: Patellar tendinopathy (PT), or jumper\'s knee, is a chronic painful overuse patellar tendon injury. For PT, prevention is more important than treatment. However, there is still a lack of strong evidence to confirm the effectiveness of prevention.
UNASSIGNED: This study will analyze by meta-analysis the effect of a prophylactic program on high PT risk people (but without PT) in reducing PT occurrence.
UNASSIGNED: PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, Scopus, and Ebscohost, from inception to January 11, 2022.
UNASSIGNED: A study comparing the effects of prophylactic programs and controls on the risk of PT was included in the analysis. After a database search with search terms ((patellar tendinopathy) OR (jumper\'s knee) OR (patellar tendinitis) OR (patellar tendinosis) OR (patellar tendonitis)) AND ((Prevent*) OR (prophyla*)), a total of 1444 items were obtained. Of these, 11 studies with 6091 participants were eligible for inclusion in this meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
UNASSIGNED: Level 2.
UNASSIGNED: The first author\'s name, publication year, study design, country, population, mean age, sex, prophylactic program, control, study duration, and the frequency or incidence of PT in each group were extracted.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 11 articles were included in the analysis. Overall, no significant difference was considered in the risk of PT between the prophylactic program and control groups based on the random-effect model (odds ratio [OR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.67, 1.08; P = 0.18). In the recruit subgroup, there was even a tendency to elevate the risk of PT occurrence after prophylaxis was executed (OR, 1.89; 95% CI, 0.68, 5.28; P = 0.22). In athletes, the prophylactic program tended to decrease the risk of PT compared with the control (OR, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.63, 1.04; P = 0.10); however, the difference was not statistically significant. Trial sequential analysis results suggested that prophylaxis may still be effective for athletes, but this needs to be confirmed with a larger sample size.
UNASSIGNED: The risk of PT cannot be reduced with the current prophylactic program. However, for athletes, the negative results may be due to insufficient sample size.