暂无摘要。

Neutrophilic urticarial dermatosis (NUD) is a rare form of dermatosis that is poorly understood. It was first described by Kieffer and colleagues as an urticarial eruption that is histopathologically characterized by a perivascular and interstitial neutrophilic infiltrate with intense leukocytoclasia and without vasculitis or dermal edema. NUD clinically presents as a chronic or recurrent eruption that consists of nonpruritic macules, papules, or plaques that are pink to reddish and that resolve within 24 hours without residual pigmentation. NUD is often associated with systemic diseases such as Schnitzler syndrome, lupus erythematosus, adult-onset Still\'s disease, and cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes.

BACKGROUND: Urticarial vasculitis (UV) should be differentiated from chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) in patients initially presenting with recurrent wheals, although criteria for differential diagnosis remain ill-defined.
OBJECTIVE: To set the goals, define criteria and unmet needs in UV diagnosis and differential diagnosis with CSU, and explore the possibility of coexistence of both diseases.
METHODS: Thirteen experts experienced in UV research participated in a Delphi survey of European Academy of Allergy and Clinical Immunology taskforce. This Delphi survey involved three rounds of anonymous responses to n = 32 questions with the aim to aggregate the experts\' opinions and to achieve consensus. Urticaria specialists (n = 130, most from Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence) evaluated the consensus statements and recommendations in the fourth and final round.
RESULTS: The panel agreed that essential criteria to guide a skin biopsy in patients with recurrent wheals should include at least one of the following features: wheal duration >24 h, bruising/postinflammatory hyperpigmentation, and systemic symptoms. Leukocytoclasia and fibrin deposits were identified as a minimum set of UV histological criteria. As agreed by the panel members, CSU and normocomplementemic UV (NUV) may coexist in some patients.
CONCLUSIONS: The use of established criteria for the diagnosis and differential diagnosis of UV in patients with recurrent wheals can help guide the diagnostic approach and prompt earlier treatment. Further studies should investigate whether CSU and NUV are different entities or part of a disease spectrum.

Chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) and urticarial vasculitis (UV) share several clinical features including the occurrence of wheals. As of yet, the criteria for differentiating the 2 disorders are not clearly defined.
Here, we aimed to identify differences, similarities, and the likelihood for specific clinical features in patients with UV versus those with CSU.
Across 10 Urticaria Centers of Reference and Excellence, 106 patients with skin biopsy-confirmed UV and 126 patients with CSU were prospectively recruited to complete a questionnaire on the clinical features, course, and response to treatment of their disease.
As compared with CSU, patients with UV more often experienced postinflammatory skin hyperpigmentation, wheals of ≥24-hour duration, eye inflammation, and fever (6.9, 4.0, 3.6, and 2.4 times, respectively). Clinical features that increased the risk for UV diagnosis when present at the onset of disease included wheals of ≥24-hour duration (7.3-fold), pain of the skin (7.0-fold), postinflammatory hyperpigmentation (4.1-fold), and fatigue (3.1-fold). The diagnostic delay was markedly longer for normocomplementemic UV as compared with hypocomplementemic UV and CSU (21 vs 5 vs 6 months, respectively). Oral corticosteroids and omalizumab were the most effective treatments in patients with UV and CSU, respectively. Patients with UV showed a higher need for immunosuppressive and anti-inflammatory therapies than patients with CSU.
Long wheal duration, skin pain and hyperpigmentation, and systemic symptoms point to UV rather than CSU as the underlying disease and should prompt further diagnostic workup including a skin biopsy.

Systemic vasculitis encompasses a group of multisystem disorders; both the diseases and the treatment strategies can have a significant impact on a patient\'s health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Using patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) and patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) to evaluate the patient\'s view of their condition, treatments, and healthcare journey is essential to the patient-centered care approach. In this paper, we discuss the use of generic, disease-specific, and treatment-specific PROMs and PREMs in systemic vasculitis and future research goals.

Glatiramer acetate is one of the oldest and safest disease modifying therapies used to treat relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. Urticarial vasculitis is a rare complication of treatment with glatiramer acetate, having been reported by only two others previously. Here, we describe a case of normocomplementemic urticarial vasculitis diagnosed on skin punch biopsy in a patient with multiple sclerosis treated with glatiramer acetate for five years. Upon treatment with steroids and an antihistamine along with discontinuation of glatiramer acetate, the urticaria resolved.

Chronic urticarial rash, mostly due to chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), is seen in up to 1 - 4% of the general population. Urticarial vasculitis (UV) and autoinflammatory syndromes, i.e., cryopyrin-associated periodic syndromes (CAPS) and Schnitzler syndrome (SchS), can mimic CSU-like rash but represent rare disorders with systemic symptoms including fever, headache, conjunctivitis, and arthralgia. Clinical and laboratory features can point to the presence of any of these diseases in patients initially presenting with chronic urticarial rash. These include long-lasting wheals (> 24 hours), lesional burning, systemic symptoms, and/or increase in inflammatory markers (e.g., C-reactive protein, serum amyloid A, and/or S100A8/9). Lesional skin biopsy usually demonstrates leukocytoclastic vasculitis (UV) or neutrophil-rich infiltrate (CAPS and SchS). In contrast to CSU, where second-generation H1 antihistamines and omalizumab allow to control symptoms in most patients, systemic immunosuppression and anti-interleukin (IL)-1 therapies are needed in case of UV and autoinflammatory diseases, respectively. The rarity and low awareness of CSU differential diagnoses may be related to the longer delays in diagnosis and therapy in those affected with UV, CAPS, and SchS. Knowledge of the differential diagnoses of CSU is important because only correct diagnosis allows adequate therapy. Complications such as the development of lymphoproliferative disease in SchS and amyloidosis in CAPS, and the presence of comorbid diseases, such as systemic lupus erythematosus in UV, must be considered and monitored.

Cutaneous vasculitis (CV) is an inflammatory skin-limited vascular disease affecting the dermal and/or hypodermal vessel wall. From the pathogenetic point of view, idiopathic forms are described as well as the induction from various triggers, such as drugs, infections, and vaccines. Following SARS-CoV-2 pandemic outbreak, cases of CV induced by both COVID-19 and COVID-19 vaccinations have been reported in literature. The aim of our work was to collect multiple cases available in the literature and analyze the frequency of the different forms of induced vasculitis, as well as their histological and immunopathological features. Although rare, CV induced by Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) and vaccines may provide interesting insights into the pathogenesis of these inflammatory processes that may in the future be useful to understand the mechanisms underlying cutaneous and systemic vasculitis.

Urticarial vasculitis (UV) is a rare entity characterised by long-lasting recurrent episodes of urticarial lesions. Although frequently idiopathic, UV has been associated with multiple diseases, including infections. We present a case of Lyme disease (LD) as a trigger of normocomplementemic UV, a very rarely described association. The patient presented first with episodes of inflammatory polyarthritis and a positive serology for Borrelia burgdorferi, later followed by the appearance of long-lasting urticarial lesions, histologically suggestive of UV. Lyme arthritis resolved with doxycycline, but UV persisted. Response to cyclosporine was satisfactory but with side effects, and only methotrexate showed substantial and consistent improvement. This case reminds physicians that chronic urticaria with atypical characteristics should raise suspicion of UV. Possible triggers for this disease must be sought, even if rarely described, such as LD. Normocomplementemic UV frequently presents a therapeutic challenge, but methotrexate can be a particularly effective therapy in this setting.

To describe the clinical and pathological features of biopsy-proven cutaneous vasculitis (CV) associated with SLE, focusing on diagnosis classification and impact on overall SLE activity.
Retrospective multicentric cohort study including SLE patients with biopsy-proven CV identified by (i) data from pathology departments of three university hospitals and (ii) a national call for cases. SLE was defined according to 1997 revised ACR and/or 2019 ACR/EULAR criteria. CV diagnosis was confirmed histologically and classified by using the dermatological addendum of the Chapel Hill classification. SLE activity and flare severity at the time of CV diagnosis were assessed independently of vasculitis items with the SELENA-SLEDAI and SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index.
Overall, 39 patients were included; 35 (90%) were female. Cutaneous manifestations included mostly palpable purpura (n = 21; 54%) and urticarial lesions (n = 18; 46%); lower limbs were the most common location (n = 33; 85%). Eleven (28%) patients exhibited extracutaneous vasculitis. A higher prevalence of Sjögren\'s syndrome (51%) was found compared with SLE patients without CV from the French referral centre group (12%, P < 0.0001) and the Swiss SLE Cohort (11%, P < 0.0001). CV was mostly classified as urticarial vasculitis (n = 14, 36%) and cryoglobulinaemia (n = 13, 33%). Only 2 (5%) patients had no other cause than SLE to explain the CV. Sixty-one percent of patients had inactive SLE.
SLE-related vasculitis seems very rare and other causes of vasculitis should be ruled out before considering this diagnosis. Moreover, in more than half of patients, CV was not associated with another sign of active SLE.