technology use

技术使用
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    技术与睡眠之间的联系比最初想象的要复杂得多。在这篇最新的理论综述中,在过去10年中,我们提出了一种新的模型,该模型基于该地区越来越多的证据。主要的理论变化是在技术使用和睡眠问题之间增加了双向联系。我们首先回顾了迄今为止最初提出的强光机制的证据,唤醒,夜间睡眠中断,和睡眠位移。然后,支持新的效果方向(技术使用前的睡眠问题),我们提出了两种新的机制:睡前技术可以用作时间填充和/或情绪调节策略,以促进睡眠开始过程.最后,我们提出了技术与睡眠之间关联的潜在调节者,认识到可能减轻或加剧技术对睡眠的影响的保护性和脆弱性因素,反之亦然。这一理论综述的目的是更新这一领域,指导未来的公共卫生信息,并促使人们对技术和睡眠有多大影响进行新的研究,对谁来说可能会有问题,以及哪些机制可以解释它们的关联。
    The link between technology and sleep is more complex than originally thought. In this updated theoretical review, we propose a new model informed by the growing body of evidence in the area over the past 10 years. The main theoretical change is the addition of bi-directional links between the use of technology and sleep problems. We begin by reviewing the evidence to date for the originally proposed mechanisms of bright light, arousal, nighttime sleep disruptions, and sleep displacement. Then, in support of the new direction of effect (sleep problems preceding technology use), we propose two new mechanisms: technology before sleep might be used as a time filler and/or as an emotional regulation strategy to facilitate the sleep-onset process. Finally, we present potential moderators of the association between technology and sleep, in recognition of protective and vulnerability factors that may mitigate or exacerbate the effects of technology on sleep and vice versa. The goal of this theoretical review is to update the field, guide future public health messages, and to prompt new research into how much technology and sleep affect each other, for whom it may be problematic, and which mechanisms may explain their association.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    教学和学习的景观,特别是在技术支持的教育领域,正在被便携式数字助理设备和其他技术工具的持续存在所改变。这些技术已成为当今学习不可或缺的方面。虚拟现实的使用,增强现实,云计算,和社交媒体通过Twitter等平台,Dropbox,GoogleApps,YouTube已经成为现代教育的常态,大大提高了高等护理教育的质量。因此,本研究旨在综合沙特阿拉伯护理教育技术有效性的证据.本研究采用系统综述方法,从相关文献综述的数据库和参考列表中提取相关研究。两名独立审稿人筛选了标题,abstract,和基于预定义的资格标准的全文。审查从15篇已发表的文章中检索到的数据中确定了四个主题。主题包括对电子学习的态度,与电子学习相关的挑战和质量,社交媒体和智能手机的使用,虚拟现实和仿真体验。在选定研究的参与者中发现了混合态度。与电子学习相关的各种挑战,社交媒体使用,智能手机,和模拟已经被确定包括技术问题,缺乏意识,缺乏培训,等。调查结果还指出,应提高与电子学习有关的认识水平,以取得沙特阿拉伯的更好成果。研究结果表明,技术有可能改善护士的学习成果,包括那些参与研究的人。因此,至关重要的是,确保教育者和学生都接受有关如何有效使用沙特阿拉伯即将推出的技术的充分培训。
    The landscape of teaching and learning, particularly in the realm of technology-supported education, is being transformed by the ongoing presence of portable digital assistant devices and other technological tools. Such technologies have become an integral aspect of learning these days. The use of Virtual Reality, Augmented Reality, cloud computing, and social media through platforms such as Twitter, Dropbox, Google Apps, and YouTube has become the norm in modern education and has greatly enhanced the quality of higher nursing education. Therefore, this study aims to synthesize evidence on the effectiveness of technology in nursing education in Saudi Arabia. The study used a systematic review methodology to extract relevant studies from databases and reference lists of related literature reviews. Two independent reviewers screened the title, abstract, and full texts based on predefined eligibility criteria. The review identified four themes from the data retrieved from 15 published articles. The themes include attitude towards e-learning, challenges and quality related to e-learning, social media and smart phones usage, virtual reality and simulation experience. Mixed attitudes have been identified among the participants of the selected studies. Various challenges linked with e-learning, social media usage, smart phones, and simulation have been identified inclusive of technical issues, lack of awareness, lack of training, etc. The findings have also stated that awareness level should be increased related to e-learning for better outcomes in Saudi Arabia. The findings suggest that technology has the potential to improve learning outcomes for nurses, including those involved in research. Therefore, it is crucial to ensure that both educators and students receive adequate training on how to effectively use the upcoming technology in Saudi Arabia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:尽管越来越多的研究揭示了社交媒体使用对幸福感的益处和危害,在社交媒体使用如何概念化方面存在异质性和缺乏共识,已定义,和测量。此外,鲜为人知的是,现有的文献是否关注疾病或幸福的结果,以及研究是否使用理论。
    目的:这篇综述的主要目的是研究(1)社交媒体使用是如何被概念化和衡量的,(2)关注的健康和福祉结果是什么,(3)研究是否使用理论。
    方法:通过涉及4个步骤的综合搜索策略进行研究。首先,关键词搜索在6个主要数据库上进行:PubMed,WebofScience,PsycINFO,Embase,ProQuest,和年度评论。第二,使用相同的搜索词集在GoogleScholar上进行了搜索,并检查了前100个结果。第三,检查了在前两轮搜索中确定的评论的参考部分,最后,检索了审查中包含的最后一组论文的参考列表。通过多级筛选,我们对符合纳入标准的论文进行了分析.
    结果:该综述包括2007年至2020年间在51个不同国家发表的233篇论文。虽然66(28%)的研究调查了社交媒体的使用或成瘾对健康和福祉的影响,167(72%)研究了社交媒体使用作为“正常”行为的影响。大多数研究都使用评估用户使用社交媒体的时间的方法。大多数研究有问题的社交媒体使用或成瘾的影响使用成瘾量表。大多数研究调查了社交媒体使用与抑郁症等精神疾病的关系。焦虑,自尊,和孤独。虽然有相当多的研究调查身体健康的结果,如自我评估的健康,睡眠,坐着或缺乏体力活动,相对较少的研究考察了社会,心理,和情感幸福。大多数研究183(79%)没有使用任何理论。
    结论:大多数研究将社交媒体使用概念化为“正常”行为,并且主要使用时间花费的衡量标准。而相当多的研究将社交媒体使用概念化为成瘾,并使用了各种成瘾措施。这些研究不成比例地侧重于调查社交媒体使用与负面健康和福祉结果的关联。研究结果表明,需要超越时间花费更复杂的测量方法,考虑用户在社交媒体平台上执行的多种活动,以及需要更多基于理论的研究,研究社交媒体使用不仅与负面健康或“疾病”,而且与积极的健康和福祉结果。
    Despite an increasing number of studies revealing both the benefits and harms of social media use on well-being, there is heterogeneity and a lack of consensus on how social media use is conceptualized, defined, and measured. Additionally, little is known whether existing literature focuses on ill-being or well-being outcomes and whether studies use theories.
    The main objective of this review was to examine (1) how social media use has been conceptualized and measured, (2) what health and well-being outcomes have been focused on, and (3) whether studies used theories.
    Studies were located through a comprehensive search strategy involving 4 steps. First, keyword searches were conducted on 6 major databases: PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO, Embase, ProQuest, and Annual Reviews. Second, a search was conducted on Google Scholar using the same sets of search terms, and the first 100 results were examined. Third, the reference sections of reviews identified in the first 2 rounds of searches were examined, and finally, the reference lists of the final set of papers included in the review were searched. Through a multistage screening, papers that met our inclusion criteria were analyzed.
    The review included a total of 233 papers published between 2007 and 2020 in 51 different countries. While 66 (28%) of the studies investigated the effects of the problematic use or addiction of social media on health and well-being, 167 (72%) studied the effects of social media use as a \"normal\" behavior. Most of the studies used measures assessing the time users spend using social media. Most of the studies that examined the effects of problematic social media use or addiction used addiction scales. Most studies examined the association of social media use with mental illnesses such as depression, anxiety, self-esteem, and loneliness. While there are a considerable number of studies investigating physical health outcomes such as self-rated health, sleep, and sitting time or lack of physical activity, relatively a small number of studies examined social, psychological, and emotional well-being. Most of the studies 183 (79%) did not use any theory.
    Most studies conceptualized social media use as a \"normal\" behavior and mostly used time-spent measures, whereas a considerable number of studies conceptualized social media use as an addiction and used various addiction measures. The studies disproportionately focused on investigating the associations of social media use with negative health and well-being outcomes. The findings suggest the need for going beyond time spent to more sophisticated measurement approaches that consider the multiplicity of activities that users perform on social media platforms and the need for more theory-based studies on the association of social media use with not only negative well-being or \"ill-being\" but also with positive health and well-being outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:远程医疗是使用技术以虚拟形式提供医疗保健。COVID-19大流行促使远程医疗的使用增加。
    目的:仅在COVID-19大流行期间至少有一组儿科患者和/或其护理人员接受远程医疗服务以及至少一个对照组接受非远程医疗服务的研究中,对儿科护理的满意度进行审查。
    方法:我们搜索了以英文发表的同行评审研究,这些研究比较了在COVID-19大流行期间接受远程医疗服务的儿科患者和/或其护理人员与接受非远程医疗服务的儿科患者和/或其护理人员对儿科护理的满意度。因为家里的命令,在大流行之前或期间进行的非远程医疗服务的比较组研究符合资格.我们于2023年1月5日在PubMed进行了搜索,EMBASE,CINAHL,和PsycInfo数据库。我们遵循系统评价和荟萃分析指南的首选报告项目。在审阅其余文章的全文之前,两名审阅者独立地筛选了标题和摘要。从每项符合条件的研究中提取了以下信息:国家,按比较组划分的参与者特征,研究设计,远程医疗方法,评估满意度的测量工具,以及对照组的发现。
    结果:所有符合条件的14项研究评估了在COVID-19大流行期间参与视频和/或电话访问的护理人员和/或儿科患者与在大流行之前或期间亲自预约的患者的满意度。在14项研究中的5项,比较非远程医疗服务发生在大流行之前,在其余9项调查中,非远程医疗服务发生在大流行期间。13项研究是采用不同设计的观察性调查,一项研究是采用3个比较组的视频进行准实验干预,面对面,混合参观。在14项研究中的9项,与面对面就诊相比,对远程医疗服务的满意度更高。护理人员对视频访问感到满意的原因是易于使用和减少了运输需求。护理人员对远程护理不满意的原因包括与提供者的个人互动有限和技术挑战。参加远程医疗的护理人员对缺乏体检表示担忧。参加非远程医疗服务的人表示,面对面的互动促进了治疗的依从性。只有一项研究评估了青少年完成自己调查的患者的满意度;与使用面对面访问的患者相比,使用远程医疗的青少年报告与提供者进行有效沟通的比例更高。
    结论:在大多数研究中,远程医疗服务往往比面对面就诊获得更有利或相当的满意度评分。远程医疗的需要改进包括应对技术挑战和在患者/护理人员和医疗提供者之间发展更好的融洽关系的策略。与儿科非远程医疗服务相比,对儿科远程医疗的有效性进行干预对于提高满意度和健康结果将是有价值的。
    背景:
    BACKGROUND: Telehealth refers to the use of technology to deliver health care remotely. The COVID-19 pandemic has prompted an increase in telehealth services.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to review satisfaction with pediatric care in studies that had at least one group of pediatric patients and their caregivers receiving telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic and at least one comparison group of those receiving nontelehealth services.
    METHODS: We searched for peer-reviewed studies published in the English language that compared the satisfaction with pediatric care between pediatric patients and their caregivers receiving telehealth services during the COVID-19 pandemic and those receiving nontelehealth services. Owing to stay-at-home orders, studies with comparison groups for nontelehealth services that took place either before or during the pandemic were eligible. We searched the PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and PsycINFO databases on January 5, 2023. We followed the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A total of 2 reviewers independently screened the titles and abstracts before reviewing the full text of the remaining articles. The following information was extracted from each eligible study: country, participant characteristics by comparison group, study design, telehealth approach, measurement tools to assess satisfaction, and findings by comparison group.
    RESULTS: All 14 eligible studies assessed satisfaction among caregivers and pediatric patients participating in video or telephone visits during the COVID-19 pandemic compared with those having in-person appointments either before or during the pandemic. In 5 of the 14 studies, a comparison of nontelehealth services took place before the pandemic, and in the remaining 9 investigations, nontelehealth services took place during the pandemic. A total of 13 studies were observational investigations with different designs, and 1 study was a quasi-experimental intervention with 3 comparison groups for video, in-person, and hybrid visits. In 9 of the 14 studies, satisfaction with telehealth services was higher than during in-person visits. Caregivers were satisfied with video visits for the ease of use and reduced need for transportation. Reasons caregivers were not satisfied with remote care included limited personal interaction with the provider, technological challenges, and a lack of physical examination. Those participating in nontelehealth services expressed that in-person interactions promoted treatment adherence. Only 1 study assessed satisfaction where adolescent patients completed their own surveys; a higher percentage of adolescents using telehealth services reported effective communication with the provider compared with patients using in-person visits.
    CONCLUSIONS: In most studies, telehealth services received more favorable or comparable satisfaction ratings than in-person visits. Needed improvements in telehealth services included strategies to address technological challenges and develop better rapport among the patient, caregiver, and medical provider. Interventions may investigate the influence of telehealth services on access to and quality of care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本文对在COVID-19大流行开始时独特出现的学术努力进行了系统的回顾,主要集中在高等教育教师对技术使用的看法以及在全球范围内过渡到紧急远程教学的过程中师生关系的相关变化。我们对32项研究的叙事综合,其中大部分来自中低收入国家/地区,这表明,许多因素相互作用,塑造了学术界在高等教育背景下的紧急远程教学中的技术使用。我们报告了教师在自我探索各种技术和教学策略以应对大流行的持续严重性方面的韧性和机智的强烈发现。最终,这篇综述提出了进一步研究的方向,让教育领导者和教师重新想象教学不仅是高等教育的核心学术功能,而且,而且重要的是,一种由关怀伦理塑造的人性化体验。
    This paper presents a systematic review of scholarly efforts that uniquely emerged at the onset of the COVID-19 pandemic and focused primarily on higher education teachers\' perspectives on technology use and on associated changes in the relationship between teachers and students amidst the transition to emergency remote teaching worldwide. Our narrative synthesis of 32 studies, the majority of which come from lower-and middle-income countries/regions, suggests that numerous factors interact to shape academics\' technology use in emergency remote teaching across higher education contexts. We report strong findings of teachers\' resilience and resourcefulness in their self-exploration of various technologies and teaching strategies in response to the continued severity of the pandemic. Ultimately, this review suggests directions for further research on engaging educational leaders and faculty in reimagining teaching as not only a core academic function of higher education, but also, and importantly, a humanising experience shaped by an ethics of care.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    UNASSIGNED:缺乏体力活动是导致包括心血管疾病(CVD)在内的慢性疾病的重要因素之一。然而,在社区轮椅使用者中,用于改善PA疗效和心血管结局的物理活动(PA)干预措施并不多.因此,本系统综述将评估现有的PA干预措施对社区住宅轮椅使用者的影响;我们特别研究了PA计划的特征,这些计划显示,与这些人群中PA和CVD结局没有任何改善的干预措施相比,PA和CVD结局有所改善.该研究还旨在为未来的研究提供一些建议。
    UNASSIGNED:使用数据库Scopus对2015年至2020年之间发表的文献进行了全面而系统的搜索,Pubmed,Embase,并进行了CochraneCENTRAL。本审查遵循了系统审查首选报告项目(PRISMA)指南。通过使用JoannaBriggs研究所的关键评估工具来评估证据的质量。参与了测试PA干预措施对社区成年轮椅使用者的功效并以英语发表的研究。两名审阅者审阅了文献,第三名审阅者解决了这些审阅者之间的任何分歧。
    UNASSIGNED:本综述选择了14篇文章。大多数研究报告了PA的改善。一些研究对参与者进行了随访,大多数研究都着眼于CVD的结果。
    未经评估:大规模随访研究,需要进行社区参与研究,评估PA干预对轮椅使用者PA和CVD结局的影响。
    UNASSIGNED: Physical inactivity is one of the important factors leading to chronic diseases including cardiovascular disease (CVD) in individuals with disabilities. However, not many Physical Activity (PA) interventions are available for improving the efficacy of PA and cardiovascular outcomes among community wheelchair users. Therefore, this systematic review will appraise the existing PA interventions for the community dwelling wheelchair users; we especially examined features of the PA programs that showed the improvements in PA and the CVD outcomes compared to the interventions that did not show any improvements in these outcomes among these population. The study also aimed to provide some recommendations for future research.
    UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive and systematic search of literature published between 2015 and 2020 using the databases Scopus, Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane CENTRAL was conducted. This review has followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review (PRISMA) guidelines. The quality of the evidence was assessed by Using Joanna Briggs Institute\'s critical appraisal tool. Studies that tested the efficacy of PA interventions for community-dwelling adult wheelchair users and published in English were involved. Two reviewers reviewed the literature and any disagreements among these reviewers were resolved by a third reviewer.
    UNASSIGNED: Fourteen articles were selected for this review. Most of the studies reported improvements in PA. A few studies followed up the participants and majority of the studies have looked at the CVD outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: Large-scale studies with follow-ups, and community participatory research that evaluates the effect of PA interventions on PA and CVD outcomes among wheelchair users are needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    在过去的十年里,大量的研究已经解决了儿童对技术的使用及其对福祉的影响。尽管如此,技术使用的可操作性仍然缺乏明确性,幸福,以及两者之间的关系。这项范围审查旨在阐明数字技术的使用,其可操作性,数字技术负面使用(DTNU)与儿童福祉的关系。对于特刊的范围,我们专注于负面使用。结果显示了DTNU的两个概念化:强迫性/成瘾性使用设备和互联网(例如,网络成瘾)和负面的在线体验/危险行为(例如,网络欺凌)。与DTNU相关的幸福感主要从心理/社会维度进行研究(例如,抑郁症),并确定了认知健康研究的差距。研究设计在很大程度上是定量的,and,在大多数研究中,幸福感被认为是DTNU的预测因子。此外,缺乏对12岁以下儿童的研究。对DTNU的未来研究应该关注:成瘾和负面在线体验的维度如何相关;提供更多关于认知幸福感的证据;探索依赖于综合概念框架的福祉多个组成部分的相互作用。考虑到本次审查的结果,还应探讨最近的数字福祉概念。
    Over the last decade, a substantial number of studies have addressed children\'s use of technologies and their impact on well-being. Nonetheless, there is still a lack of clarity on the operationalisation of technology use, well-being, and the relation between the two. This scoping review intended to shed lights on Digital Technologies Use, its operationalisation, and the relation between Digital Technologies Negative Use (DTNU) and children\'s well-being. For the scope of the special issue we focused on negative use. Results showed two conceptualisations of DTNU: compulsive/addictive use of devices and the Internet (e.g., Internet addiction) and negative online experiences/risky behaviours (e.g., cyberbullying). Well-being in relation to DTNU was mainly studied in terms of psycho/social dimensions (e.g., depression), and a gap in cognitive well-being studies was identified. Study designs were largely quantitative, and, in most studies, well-being was considered as a predictor of DTNU. Also, research with children under 12 years was lacking. Future research on DTNU should look at: how dimensions of addiction and negative online experiences relate; provide more evidence on cognitive well-being; explore the interplay of well-being multiple components relying on integrative conceptual frameworks. The recent notion of digital well-being should also be explored considering the results of this review.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    对青少年育儿的担忧并不新鲜,但是数字技术的迅速扩散加剧了人们对数字育儿的焦虑。关于数字技术对青少年福祉的影响的结果肯定是混合的,而父母在没有基于经验的路线图的情况下,就可以解决他们的担忧。理解科学状况的一个缺失环节是如何衡量数字育儿的清晰特征,包括评估哪些领域需要过多的科学关注,哪些领域被忽视了。为了解决这个差距,我们对数字育儿文献进行了两次跨学科系统综述,并对(a)定量调查(n=145项研究)和(b)定性焦点小组进行了特征性测量,采访,codesign研究,和用户研究(n=49)。我们描述了以前流行的调查测量领域,这些领域与数字空间的育儿相关性正在下降(例如,共同使用,悬停)。我们同样强调被忽视的领域,包括考虑数字技术的积极使用,承认双向影响,并注意家庭之间的异质性以及支持和监测的外部社会生态。我们为数字育儿研究的未来提供建议,并提出了一种更全面的方法来衡量现代青少年的育儿方式。
    Concerns about parenting adolescents are not new, but the rapid diffusion of digital technologies has heightened anxieties over digital parenting. Findings are decidedly mixed regarding the impact of digital technologies on adolescent well-being, and parents are left to navigate their concerns without an empirically based road map. A missing link for understanding the state of the science is a clear characterization of how digital parenting is measured, including an evaluation of which areas demand an outsized share of scientific attention and which have been overlooked. To address this gap, we undertook two interdisciplinary systematic reviews of the digital-parenting literature and characterized measurement across (a) quantitative surveys (n = 145 studies) and (b) qualitative focus groups, interviews, codesign studies, and user studies (n = 49). We describe previously popular areas of survey measurement that are of decreasing relevance to parenting of digital spaces (e.g., co-use, hovering). We likewise highlight areas that have been overlooked, including consideration of positive uses of digital technologies, acknowledgment of bidirectional influence, and attention to heterogeneity among families and to extraparental social ecologies of support and monitoring. We provide recommendations for the future of digital-parenting research and propose a more comprehensive approach to measuring how modern adolescents are parented.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:技术设备或便携式数字助理设备的可用性不断提高,继续改变教学格局,包括技术支持的学习。便携式数字助理和技术使用已成为当今教学和学习的组成部分。云计算,其中包括YouTube,GoogleApps,Dropbox和Twitter,已经成为当今教学和学习的现实,并显著提高了高等教育,包括护理教育。
    目的:这篇综合文献综述的目的是探索和描述护理教育教学中的技术使用。
    方法:Whittemore和Knafl的五步综合审查框架用于实现本研究的目标。作者搜索了EBSCOhost(健康信息源和健康科学)的经验和非经验文章,ScienceDirect和非洲期刊在线图书馆数据库,以建立有关关键字的已知信息。文献检索中包括的关键术语是2019年冠状病毒病(COVID-19),数字化学习,在线学习,护理,教学和学习,和技术使用。
    结果:选择19篇文章进行分析。从这篇综述中出现的主题是(1)护理教育中的技术使用,(2)技术在护理教育中的应用方式,(3)护理教育技术运用的前因,(4)技术在护理教育中的应用优势,(5)在护理教育中使用技术的弊端;(6)在COVID-19中在护理教育中使用技术。
    结论:在临床和课堂教学中都使用了护理教育技术来补充学习。然而,尽管它呈上升趋势,但接受度仍然存在差距。贡献:这项研究的发现有助于了解护理教育中技术用于教学的现象。
    BACKGROUND:  The increasing availability of technology devices or portable digital assistant devices continues to change the teaching-learning landscape, including technology-supported learning. Portable digital assistants and technology usage have become an integral part of teaching and learning nowadays. Cloud computing, which includes YouTube, Google Apps, Dropbox and Twitter, has become the reality of today\'s teaching and learning and has noticeably improved higher education, including nursing education.
    OBJECTIVE:  The aim of this integrative literature review was to explore and describe technology usage for teaching and learning in nursing education.
    METHODS:  A five-step integrative review framework by Whittemore and Knafl was used to attain the objective of this study. The authors searched for both empirical and non-empirical articles from EBSCOhost (health information source and health science), ScienceDirect and African Journals Online Library databases to establish what is already known about the keywords. Key terms included in literature search were coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), digital learning, online learning, nursing, teaching and learning, and technology use.
    RESULTS:  Nineteen articles were selected for analysis. The themes that emerged from this review were (1) technology use in nursing education, (2) the manner in which technology is used in nursing education, (3) antecedents for technology use in nursing education, (4) advantages of technology use in nursing education, (5) disadvantages of technology use in nursing education and (6) technology use in nursing education amidst COVID-19.
    CONCLUSIONS:  Technology in nursing education is used in both clinical and classroom teaching to complement learning. However, there is still a gap in its acceptance despite its upward trend.Contribution: The findings of this study contribute to the body of knowledge on the phenomenon of technology use for teaching and learning in nursing education.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    随着全球技术设备使用的增加,父母技术对亲子关系的质量和儿童的健康和发展是一个潜在的威胁。父母技术是指由于父母使用技术设备而导致父母与孩子之间的互动中断。这次范围审查的目的是绘制地图,描述,并总结现有的证据,从已发表的关于父母技术对亲子关系和儿童健康和发展的影响的研究中,找出研究的局限性和文献中的空白。
    此范围审查将按照JoannaBriggsInstitute(JBI)方法进行。将在APAPsycInfo进行相关研究的搜索,MEDLINE,中央,Cochrane系统评价数据库,JBIEBP,和Embase(OVID)。还将搜索CINAHL(Ebsco)和Scopus。灰色和通俗文学将被排除在外。这篇综述将包括以英语发表的主要研究研究和评论论文,没有时间限制,以确定技术对亲子关系以及儿童健康和发育结果的影响。家长参与者包括主要照顾者,无论是生物,通过,或者养父母,18岁以下从事技术咨询的儿童。两名审阅者将独立筛选标题,摘要,以及根据纳入和排除标准的研究全文。分歧将通过与第三位研究人员的讨论来解决。数据将被提取到包括作者在内的数据图表表中,出版年份,国家,研究目的,方法论/设计,人口和样本量,变量/概念,以及相应的措施和主要成果。数据将在表格和数字中列出,并附有叙述性摘要。
    本次范围审查的目的是概述父母技术对亲子关系以及儿童和健康发展结果的影响的证据。强调当今儿童的当前风险。它将找出文献中的空白,告知未来的研究,为父母提供有关技术设备使用的建议,并可能指导旨在解决父母技术问题的干预措施的发展。
    开放科学框架https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF。IO/QNTS5。
    With increases in the use of technological devices worldwide, parental technoference is a potential threat to the quality of parent-child relationships and children\'s health and development. Parental technoference refers to disrupted interactions between a parent and child due to a parent\'s use of a technological device. The aims of this scoping review are to map, describe, and summarize the existing evidence from published research studies on the impacts of parental technoference on parent-child relationships and children\'s health and development and to identify the limitations in the studies and gaps in the literature.
    This scoping review will be conducted in accordance with the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) methodology. A search for relevant research studies will be undertaken in APA PsycInfo, MEDLINE, Central, Cochrane Database for Systematic Reviews, JBI EBP, and Embase (OVID). CINAHL (Ebsco) and Scopus will also be searched. Grey and popular literature will be excluded. This review will include primary research studies and review papers published in English with no time limit that identify the impacts of technoference on parent-child relationships and child health and developmental outcomes. Parent participants include primary caregivers, either biological, adopted, or foster parents, of children under the age of 18 who engage in technoference. Two reviewers will independently screen the titles, abstracts, and full texts of studies according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria. Disagreements will be resolved through discussion with a third researcher. Data will be extracted into a data charting table including author(s), year of publication, country, research aim, methodology/design, population and sample size, variables/concepts, and corresponding measures and main results. Data will be presented in tables and figures accompanied by a narrative summary.
    The goal of this scoping review is to present an overview of the evidence on the impacts of parental technoference on parent-child relationships and child and health developmental outcomes, highlighting the current risk of children of today. It will identify gaps in the literature, inform future research, advise recommendations for parents on technological device use, and possibly guide the development of interventions aimed at addressing parental technoference.
    Open Science Framework https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QNTS5.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号