tax

tax
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    人T细胞白血病病毒1型(HTLV-1)是一种人类逆转录病毒,可在5%至10%的受感染个体中引起白血病。在病毒蛋白中,税收已被描述为直接参与病毒诱导的白血病发生。因此,税收是一个有趣的治疗目标。然而,其3D结构仍然未知,这阻碍了基于药物设计的治疗策略的开发.有几种算法可用于预测蛋白质的结构,特别是最近出现了人工智能(AI)驱动的管道。这里,我们回顾了如何使用不同的建模策略通过几种算法来预测税收结构。我们讨论了理解税收结构/职能关系的后果,更普遍的是使用模块化和/或柔性蛋白质的结构模型,这在逆转录病毒中很常见。
    Human T-cell Leukemia Virus type 1 (HTLV-1) is a human retrovirus responsible for leukaemia in 5 to 10% of infected individuals. Among the viral proteins, Tax has been described as directly involved in virus-induced leukemogenesis. Tax is therefore an interesting therapeutic target. However, its 3D structure is still unknown and this hampers the development of drug-design-based therapeutic strategies. Several algorithms are available that can be used to predict the structure of proteins, particularly with the recent appearance of artificial intelligence (AI)-driven pipelines. Here, we review how the structure of Tax is predicted by several algorithms using distinct modelling strategies. We discuss the consequences for the understanding of Tax structure/function relationship, and more generally for the use of structure models for modular and/or flexible proteins, which are frequent in retroviruses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    Immunity against pathogens evolved through complex mechanisms that only for sake of simplicity are defined as innate immunity and adaptive immunity. Indeed innate and adaptive immunity are strongly intertwined each other during evolution. The complexity is further increased by intrinsic mechanisms of immunity that rely on the action of intracellular molecules defined as restriction factors (RFs) that, particularly in virus infections, counteract the action of pathogen gene products acting at different steps of virus life cycle.
    Here we provide an overview on the nature and the mode of action of restriction factors involved in retrovirus infection, particularly Human T Leukemia/Lymphoma Virus 1 (HTLV-1) infection. As it has been extensively studied by our group, special emphasis is given to the involvement of the MHC class II transactivator CIITA discovered in our laboratory as regulator of adaptive immunity and subsequently as restriction factor against HIV-1 and HTLV-1, a unique example of dual function linking adaptive and intrinsic immunity during evolution. We describe the multiple molecular mechanisms through which CIITA exerts its restriction on retroviruses. Of relevance, we review the unprecedented findings pointing to a concerted action of several restriction factors such as CIITA, TRIM22 and TRIM19/PML in synergizing against retroviral replication. Finally, as CIITA profoundly affects HTLV-1 replication by interacting and inhibiting the function of HTLV-1 Tax-1 molecule, the major viral product associated to the virus oncogenicity, we also put forward the hypothesis of CIITA as counteractor of HTLV-1-mediated cancer initiation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在日益复杂的废物市场中,基于市场的政策工具,比如处置税,可以激励可持续发展,同时为创新留下灵活性。然而,处置税的实施经常受到家庭废物处理者的批评,他们害怕被其他国家的竞争对手竞争。本文讨论了三种基于市场的创新工具,这些工具限制了对国际竞争力的影响:可交易回收信用,退处置税和差别化处置税。在欧洲,所有三项文书都已针对不同的环境政策实施。为了说明这些工具如何用于废物政策,文献综述补充了比利时含金属废物流中切碎机残留物的案例研究。分析表明,传统的处置税仍然是最有效的,简单透明的仪器。然而,如果国际竞争是一个重大问题,或者政治支持薄弱,退还和有区别的处置税可以作为第二好的工具具有附加值。可交易的回收信贷不是在具有市场力量的小型废物市场中使用的适当工具。此外,退还的税收创造了类似的激励措施,但导致交易成本降低。
    In an increasingly complex waste market, market-based policy instruments, such as disposal taxes, can give incentives for sustainable progress while leaving flexibility for innovation. However, implementation of disposal taxes is often criticised by domestic waste handlers that fear to be outcompeted by competitors in other countries. The article discusses three innovative market-based instruments that limit the impact on international competitiveness: Tradable recycling credits, refunded disposal taxes and differentiated disposal taxes. All three instruments have already been implemented for distinct environmental policies in Europe. In order to illustrate how these instruments can be used for waste policy, the literature review is complemented with a case study on shredder residues from metal-containing waste streams in Belgium. The analysis shows that a conventional disposal tax remains the most efficient, simple and transparent instrument. However, if international competition is a significant issue or if political support is weak, refunded and differentiated disposal taxes can have an added value as second-best instruments. Tradable recycling credits are not an appropriate instrument for use in small waste markets with market power. In addition, refunded taxes create similar incentives, but induce lower transactions costs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号