sedentary behaviour

久坐行为
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:通常使用每日容量指标来描述身体活动和久坐行为。然而,对于幼儿(6-12岁),特别是患有脑瘫等疾病的儿童,探索身体行为是如何积累的,可以为行为改变干预计划提供有价值的见解。
    目的:6-12岁脑瘫儿童的体力活动和久坐行为是如何积累的,这与他们通常发育中的同龄人有什么不同吗?
    方法:一项横断面研究,对患有CP(CP)的非卧床儿童和通常发育中的(TD)儿童进行了便利样本,6-12年,被招募。儿童在典型的日常活动中佩戴大腿运动监测器(activPAL4)。每天久坐的总体积,直立和踏步时间的特征以及在活动中如何积累。
    结果:TD(n=14,8.2±1.8岁)和CP儿童(n=15,8.6±1.4岁)之间的身体行为的体积或累积测量没有差异(p<0.05)。然而,个体之间的活动积累模式差异很大。每天时间在每种身体行为中的平均比例,在设定时间以上的回合中累积为:直立时间:回合>5分钟46%TD和CP,bouts>20分钟9%TD&CP;步进时间:bouts>0.5分钟50%TD,45%CP,超过2分钟10%TD,9%CP;久坐时间:回合>5分钟77%TD,76%CP,超过30分钟26%TD,29%CP。
    结论:年龄在6-12岁的CP儿童与TD同龄人没有不同的身体行为。然而,对于个人来说,身体活动和久坐行为发作的积累的描述符提供了额外的信息,超过量的措施,深入了解可用于指导干预计划的行为。
    BACKGROUND: Physical activity and sedentary behaviour are usually described using daily volume indicators. However, for young children (6-12 years) and specifically those with conditions such as Cerebral Palsy, exploration of how physical behaviours are accumulated may provide valuable insight for behaviour change intervention planning.
    OBJECTIVE: How are physical activity and sedentary behaviour accumulated by 6-12 year old children with Cerebral Palsy and is this different from their typically developing peers?
    METHODS: A cross-sectional study of a convenience sample of ambulatory children with CP (CP) and typically developing (TD) children, 6-12 years, was recruited. Children wore a thigh worn activity monitor (activPAL4) during typical daily activities. Overall volume of daily sedentary, upright and stepping time was characterised as well as how this was accumulated in bouts of activity.
    RESULTS: There were no differences (p<0.05) in either volume or accumulation measures of physical behaviours between TD (n=14, 8.2±1.8 years) and children with CP (n=15, 8.6±1.4 years). However, there was wide variation in activity accumulation patterns between individuals. The mean proportion of daily time in each physical behaviour, accumulated in bouts above set times was: Upright time: bouts >5 mins 46 % TD & CP, bouts >20 mins 9 % TD & CP; Stepping time: bouts >0.5 mins 50 % TD, 45 % CP, bouts >2 mins 10 % TD, 9 % CP; Sedentary time: bouts >5 mins 77 % TD, 76 % CP, bouts >30 mins 26 % TD, 29 % CP.
    CONCLUSIONS: Young children with CP aged 6-12 years do not appear to have different physical behaviours to their TD peers. However, for individuals, descriptors of accumulation of physical activity and sedentary behaviour bouts provides additional information over and above volume measures, giving insight into behaviour which may be used to inform intervention planning.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:在睡眠中度过的时间,久坐行为(SB),和身体活动是24小时的穷举和相互排斥的部分,需要结合起来考虑。这项研究的目的是确定有效的自我报告工具,用于评估整个24小时的运动行为,并查看它们的属性和度量属性。
    方法:数据库PubMed,Scopus,和SPORTDiscus一直搜索到2023年9月。纳入标准是:(I)以英语出版,(Ii)每篇经评审的论文,(iii)评估自我报告的睡眠时间,SB,和身体活动,(Iv)评估整个24小时内所有估计值的测量属性,(五)纳入青少年,成年人,或老年人。使用基于共识的健康测量仪器清单选择标准评估纳入研究的方法学质量。
    结果:我们的搜索返回了2064条记录。经过研究选择,我们纳入了16篇文章,报道了12种独特的自我报告工具的结构效度和/或重测信度-8份问卷,三次使用时间召回,和一次性日记。大多数工具可以评估睡眠时间,以及特定领域的SB和身体活动,并说明行为总和应为24小时。睡眠的有效性(和可靠性)相关系数介于0.22和0.69(0.41和0.92)之间,对于SB在0.06和0.57(0.33和0.91)之间,对于0.18至0.46(0.55至0.94)之间的光强度体力活动,以及0.38至0.56(0.59至0.94)之间的中等强度至高强度体力活动。纳入研究的质量大多是公平的。
    结论:本综述发现,目前只有有限数量的经过验证的自我报告工具可用于评估24小时运动行为。大多数工具的有效性和可靠性通常足以用于流行病学研究和人口监测,虽然对个人水平评估的充分性和对行为变化的反应性知之甚少。为了进一步支持研究,政策,和实践,需要开发新的工具,与新兴的24小时运动范式产生共鸣,并通过使用成分数据分析来评估测量特性。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42022330868。
    BACKGROUND: Time spent in sleep, sedentary behaviour (SB), and physical activity are exhaustive and mutually exclusive parts of a 24-h day that need to be considered in a combination. The aim of this study was to identify validated self-reported tools for assessment of movement behaviours across the whole 24-h day, and to review their attributes and measurement properties.
    METHODS: The databases PubMed, Scopus, and SPORTDiscus were searched until September 2023. Inclusion criteria were: (i) published in English language, (ii) per-reviewed paper, (iii) assessment of self-reported time spent in sleep, SB, and physical activity, (iv) evaluation of measurement properties of all estimates across the full 24-h day, and (v) inclusion of adolescents, adults, or older adults. The methodological quality of included studies was assessed using the Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments checklist.
    RESULTS: Our search returned 2064 records. After studies selection, we included 16 articles that reported construct validity and/or test-retest reliability of 12 unique self-reported tools - eight questionnaires, three time-use recalls, and one time-use diary. Most tools enable assessment of time spent in sleep, and domain-specific SB and physical activity, and account that sum of behaviours should be 24 h. Validity (and reliability) correlation coefficients for sleep ranged between 0.22 and 0.69 (0.41 and 0.92), for SB between 0.06 and 0.57 (0.33 and 0.91), for light-intensity physical activity between 0.18 and 0.46 (0.55 and 0.94), and for moderate- to vigorous-intensity physical activity between 0.38 and 0.56 (0.59 and 0.94). The quality of included studies being mostly fair-to-good.
    CONCLUSIONS: This review found that only a limited number of validated self-reported tools for assessment of 24-h movement behaviours are currently available. Validity and reliability of most tools are generally adequate to be used in epidemiological studies and population surveillance, while little is known about adequacy for individual level assessments and responsiveness to behavioural change. To further support research, policy, and practice, there is a need to develop new tools that resonate with the emerging 24-h movement paradigm and to evaluate measurement properties by using compositional data analysis.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42022330868.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    坐姿引起的餐后血流损伤是久坐行为与心脏代谢疾病风险之间的重要联系。这项工作的目的是检查在久坐的3小时期间每30分钟进行的阻力运动中断(REB)对久坐的成年人对随后口服葡萄糖负荷的血管舒张反应的影响。二十四名久坐的成年人(27±7岁,16名女性)完成了两个条件。空腹血糖,胰岛素,在标准早餐食用前立即测量the动脉血流(PABF)和腓肠肌灌注。早餐后,3小时REB或不间断(SIT)干预期开始。参与者坐在工作站,在此期间60和120分钟测量the动脉剪切率(PASR)。在REB条件下,参与者进行了3分钟的REB(3×[20s深蹲,20秒高的膝盖,20s小腿升起])每30分钟一次。干预期之后,重复基线测量.然后参与者喝了75克葡萄糖饮料,在接下来的120分钟内,每30-60分钟测量PABF和灌注。相对于SIT,REB在60分钟时增加PASR(+31.4±9.2/s,P=0.037)和120分钟(+37.4±10.2/s,P=0.019)进入干预期。胰岛素和葡萄糖增加(P<0.001)响应葡萄糖消耗,条件之间无差异(P≥0.299)。为了响应葡萄糖负荷,灌注(1.57vs.1.11毫升/100毫升/分钟,P=0.023)和PABF(+45.3±11.8mL/min,与SIT相比,REB后P=0.001)更大。在久坐的3小时期间每30分钟执行3分钟REB,可增强腿部血流对口服葡萄糖负荷的反应。重点:这项研究的中心问题是什么?在久坐的3小时期间进行的3分钟抗阻运动中断(REB)是否可以增强久坐的成年人对随后口服葡萄糖负荷的血管舒张反应?主要发现及其重要性是什么?进行3分钟REB,其中包括深蹲,高膝盖,小牛饲养,与久坐的成年人连续坐3小时相比,每30分钟增强下肢血流对随后口服葡萄糖负荷的反应。坐姿引起的餐后血管舒张功能损害已被确定为久坐行为与心脏代谢疾病之间的联系。因此,本研究提出了一种潜在有效的策略来抵消这种风险。
    Sitting-induced impairments in postprandial blood flow are an important link between sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic disease risk. The objective of this work was to examine the effects of resistance exercise breaks (REB) performed every 30 min during an otherwise sedentary 3-h period on the vasodilatory response to a subsequent oral glucose load in sedentary adults. Twenty-four sedentary adults (27 ± 7 years, 16 females) completed two conditions. Fasting blood glucose, insulin, popliteal artery blood flow (PABF) and gastrocnemius perfusion were measured immediately before standardized breakfast consumption. After breakfast, the 3-h REB or uninterrupted (SIT) intervention period commenced. Participants sat at a workstation, and popliteal artery shear rate (PASR) was measured 60 and 120 min into this period. In the REB condition, participants performed a 3-min REB (3 × [20 s squats, 20 s high knees, 20 s calf raises]) every 30 min. Following the intervention period, baseline measurements were repeated. Participants then consumed a 75 g glucose beverage, and PABF and perfusion were measured every 30-60 min for the following 120 min. Relative to SIT, REB increased PASR at 60 min (+31.4 ± 9.2/s, P = 0.037) and 120 min (+37.4 ± 10.2/s, P = 0.019) into the intervention period. Insulin and glucose increased (P < 0.001) in response to glucose consumption, with no differences between conditions (P ≥ 0.299). In response to the glucose load, perfusion (1.57 vs. 1.11 mL/100 mL/min, P = 0.023) and PABF (+45.3 ± 11.8 mL/min, P = 0.001) were greater after REB versus SIT. Performing 3-min REB every 30 min during an otherwise sedentary 3-h period augmented leg blood flow responses to an oral glucose load. HIGHLIGHTS: What is the central question of this study? Can 3-min resistance exercise breaks (REB) performed during an otherwise sedentary 3-h period augment the vasodilatory response to a subsequent oral glucose load in sedentary adults? What is the main finding and its importance? Performing 3-min REB, which included squats, high knees, and calf raises, every 30 min augmented lower limb blood flow responses to a subsequent oral glucose load compared to 3 h of uninterrupted sitting in sedentary adults. Sitting-induced impairment in postprandial vasodilatory function has been identified as a link between sedentary behaviour and cardiometabolic disease. Thus, the current study presents a potentially effective strategy to offset this risk.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:世界卫生组织发布了关于理想的身体活动量的建议,婴儿的久坐行为和睡眠,幼儿和学龄前儿童。为了促进将其解释和翻译成公共卫生政策,我们分析了支持制定世卫组织各项建议的证据的数量和质量.
    方法:提取了在告知WHO指南的研究中分析的每个暴露-结果对的所有数据,和预定义的标准,基于等级方法论,用于对每个结果和研究结果进行分类。
    结果:在可纳入的237项研究中,37个是实验性的,200个是观察性的,产生920个暴露-结果关联分析。62项分析使用了相关结果,有或没有显著的结果。世卫组织的10项建议中有5项是基于零分析,对相关健康结果有显著结果。其余的建议主要基于评估肥胖相关结果的分析。10个GLs阈值中有8个未得到临床相关结果的任何显著分析的支持。
    结论:虽然这些发现不应被解释为试图反驳儿童早期健康生活习惯的益处,既不能最大限度地减少专家在这个复杂研究领域的工作,目前支持采用推荐阈值作为行为监测和公共卫生干预目标的证据非常有限.因此,在获得更多数据之前,应制定公共卫生干预措施,以平衡是否将重点放在仍未得到高质量证据支持的具体目标的实现上,还是放在健康行为的普遍促进上。
    BACKGROUND: The WHO issued recommendations about the ideal amount of physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep in infants, toddlers and preschool children. To facilitate their interpretation and translation into public health policies, we analysed the quantity and quality of the evidence that supported the development of each WHO recommendation.
    METHODS: All data for each exposure-outcome pair analysed in the studies informing WHO guidelines were extracted, and predefined criteria, based upon GRADE methodology, were used to classify each outcome and study result.
    RESULTS: Among the 237 studies that could be included, 37 were experimental and 200 were observational, yielding 920 analyses of exposure-outcome associations. Sixty-two analyses used a relevant outcome, with or without significant results. Five of the 10 WHO recommendations were based upon zero analyses with significant results on relevant health outcomes. The remaining recommendations were mostly based upon analyses evaluating obesity-related outcomes. Eight of the 10 GLs thresholds were not supported by any significant analysis on clinically relevant outcomes.
    CONCLUSIONS: While these findings should not be interpreted as an attempt to disprove the benefits of healthy lifestyle habits in early childhood, neither to minimize the work of the experts in this complex research field, very limited evidence currently supports the adoption of recommended thresholds as behavioural surveillance and public health interventions targets. Therefore, until further data are available, public health interventions should be developed balancing whether to focus on the achievement of specific targets that are still not supported by high-quality evidence or on the general promotion of healthy behaviours.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:体力活动(PA),睡眠和久坐时间现在被认为是24小时的相互排斥和详尽的部分-如果PA降低,睡觉的时间,久坐或两者都必须增加,以便所有成分都等于24小时。时间使用流行病学的最新进展表明,我们不应该考虑时间使用领域(PA,睡眠和久坐时间)相互隔离,但就组成而言-24小时内时间使用域的混合。虽然已知相互关联的日常活动在糖尿病的管理中很重要,很少有研究调查了患有活动性糖尿病相关足部溃疡(DFU)的人的相关日常活动及其对伤口严重程度等重要结局的影响,血糖控制和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。这项可行性研究旨在确定在有DFU的人群中测量24小时使用时间数据的可接受性和实用性,及其与该人群重要结果指标的关联。
    方法:参与者佩戴手腕佩戴加速度计两周,并完成人口统计和HRQoL问卷。结果是参与者参与,报告的研究负担和价值水平以及成分数据分析作为评估24小时时间数据使用的方法学方法。
    结果:26名参与者报告研究负担较低,并对研究价值给予高度评价。该方案在招聘(81%)和保留率(86%)方面似乎是可行的。平均而言,参与者在久坐时间内相对久坐花费747、172和18分钟,轻度体力活动和中等至剧烈的活动,分别。睡眠似乎足够,参与者平均获得485分钟,但是睡眠质量明显较差,平均睡眠效率为75%。成分数据分析能够量化24小时使用时间与HRQoL的综合关联。
    结论:该方案提供了一种可接受的方法来收集DFU患者的24小时使用时间数据。作为24小时活性组合物的一部分来考虑和分析PA的努力可以在该临床人群中提供对PA的整体和现实的理解。
    BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA), sleep and sedentary time are now recognised as mutually exclusive and exhaustive parts of the 24-h day-if PA decreases, time spent sleeping, being sedentary or both must increase so that all components equate to 24 h. Recent advances in time-use epidemiology suggest that we should not consider time-use domains (PA, sleep and sedentary time) in isolation from each other, but in terms of a composition-the mix of time-use domains across the 24-h day. While interrelated daily activities are known to be important in the management of diabetes mellitus, few studies have investigated the interrelated daily activities in people with an active diabetes-related foot ulcer (DFU) and their impact on important outcomes such as wound severity, blood glucose control and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This feasibility study aims to determine the acceptability and practicality of measuring 24-h use of time data in people with a DFU and its associations on important outcome measures for this population.
    METHODS: Participants wore a wrist-worn accelerometer for two weeks and completed demographic and HRQoL questionnaires. Outcomes were participant engagement, reported levels of study burden and value and compositional data analysis as a methodological approach for evaluating 24-h use of time data.
    RESULTS: Twenty-six participants reported low levels of study burden and rated the study value highly. The protocol appears feasible in terms of recruitment (81%) and retention rate (86%). On average, participants were relatively sedentary spending 747, 172 and 18 min in sedentary time, light physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous activity, respectively. Sleep appeared adequate with participants obtaining an average of 485 min, but quality of sleep was notably poor with average sleep efficiency of 75%. Compositional data analysis was able to quantify the integrated associations of 24-h use of time with HRQoL.
    CONCLUSIONS: The protocol provides an acceptable method to collect 24-h use of time data in people with a DFU. Efforts to consider and analyse PA as part of a 24-h activity composition may provide holistic and realistic understandings of PA in this clinical population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:身体活动(PA)对整体健康和福祉很重要,但是有智力障碍的成年人往往很难达到足够的PA水平。因此,有必要了解他们的行为。
    目的:开发一项单项体育活动意向测量(SPAIM)来评估智障成年人的PA意向,并初步分析其心理测量特性的有效性和可靠性。
    方法:该研究分为三个阶段:开发SPAIM,评估其有效性和可靠性证据,并进行横断面调查,分析PA意向(以SPAIM衡量)与PA水平之间的关系。参与者在2016年9月至2017年8月期间从牛津的不同环境中招募,英国,以确保整个智力残疾领域的代表性。
    结果:有82名20-68岁(平均年龄36±13岁)的参与者有轻度深度智力障碍。该研究提供了与内容和响应过程相关的有效性的证据,以确保受访者理解。此外,提供了测试标准证据,显示PA意图与久坐时间/天之间的预测性相关性(解释变异性的12%)。然而,PA意图与PA分钟/周之间没有相关性。该研究还提供了充分的重测证据(r=0.78)。
    结论:SPAIM可能是测量智障成年人PA意向的有价值的工具。修改PA的意图可能对减少久坐行为和改善该人群的健康结果至关重要。SPAIM在不同背景下的未来研究和应用将加深我们对PA意图的理解并探索其预测特征。
    BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA) is important for overall health and well-being, but adults with intellectual disabilities often struggle to achieve adequate levels of PA. Therefore, it is necessary to understand their PA behaviour.
    OBJECTIVE: To develop a Single-Item Physical Activity Intention Measure (SPAIM) to assess PA intentions of adults with intellectual disabilities and preliminarily analyse its psychometric properties in terms of validity and reliability.
    METHODS: The study had three phases: developing the SPAIM, assessing its validity and reliability evidence, and conducting a cross-sectional survey to analyse the relationship between PA intentions (measured by SPAIM) and PA levels. Participants were recruited between September 2016 and August 2017 from diverse settings in Oxford, UK, to ensure representation across the intellectual disability spectrum.
    RESULTS: There were 82 participants aged 20-68 (mean age 36 ± 13) years who had mild-profound intellectual disabilities. The study provided evidence of content- and response processes-related validity to ensure respondents\' understanding. Additionally, test-criterion evidence was provided, showing a predictive correlation between PA intention and sedentary hours/day (12 % of the explained variability). However, there was no correlation between PA intention and PA minutes/week. The study also provided adequate test-retest evidence (r = 0.78).
    CONCLUSIONS: SPAIM may be a valuable tool for measuring PA intention in adults with intellectual disabilities. Modifying PA intentions could prove crucial in reducing sedentary behaviour and improving the health outcomes of this population. Future research and application of SPAIM in varied contexts will deepen our understanding of PA intentions and explore its predictive characteristics.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:现在广泛主张实现更多的体力活动(PA)时间和更少的久坐行为时间的更健康平衡,以实现多种健康益处。这项研究引入了身体活动和坐姿平衡指数(PASTBI),一个潜在的风险识别工具解决了PA和久坐行为之间的相互作用;并旨在探讨其与澳大利亚成年人全因死亡风险的关系.
    方法:这项前瞻性队列研究分析了澳大利亚糖尿病,5,836名澳大利亚成年人的肥胖和生活方式研究(AusDiab)数据。通过将中等强度强度PA(分钟/天)的总持续时间除以静坐时间(ST)(小时/天)来计算PASTBI,两者均在基线时自我报告(2004-05)。PASTBI以从Q1-低PA/高ST到Q4-高PA/低ST的四分位数表示。PASTBI与全因死亡率之间的关系(2022年)使用Cox比例风险回归模型进行了社会人口统计学调整,生活方式因素,腰围,以及合并症的数量。
    结果:在78,406人年的随访中(中位随访时间为14.3年),有885例死亡(15%)。在完全调整的模型中,与最高PASTBI类别(四分位数4-高PA/低ST)相比,来自最低PASTBI类别(四分位数1-低PA/高ST)的参与者的全因死亡率风险较高[HR(95%CI)=1.47(1.21~1.79)].
    结论:PA和ST花费的时间平衡较差(以简约的PASTBI指数方法为特征)与全因死亡风险较高相关。
    BACKGROUND: Achieving a healthier balance of more time spent in physical activity (PA) and less time in sedentary behavior is now widely advocated for achieving multiple health benefits. This study introduces a Physical Activity and Sitting Time Balance Index (PASTBI), a potential risk identification tool addressing the interplay between PA and sedentary behavior; and aims to explore its association with the risk of all-cause mortality in Australian adults.
    METHODS: This prospective cohort study analyzed the Australian Diabetes, Obesity and Lifestyle Study (AusDiab) data on 5,836 Australian adults. The PASTBI was calculated by dividing the total duration of PA (minutes/day) by the duration of sitting time (ST) (hours/day), both self-reported at baseline (2004-2005). The PASTBI was expressed in quartiles ranging from Q1 - low PA/high ST to Q4 - high PA/low ST. The association between PASTBI and all-cause mortality was explored (in 2022) using the Cox proportional hazards regression models adjusted for socio-demographics, lifestyle factors, waist circumference, and the number of comorbidities.
    RESULTS: During 78,406 person-years of follow-up (median follow-up of 14.3 years), there were 885 deaths (15%). In the fully adjusted model, compared to those in the highest PASTBI category (Quartile 4 - high PA/low ST), participants from the lowest PASTBI category (Quartile 1 - low PA/high ST) were at a higher risk of all-cause mortality [HR (95% CI) = 1.47 (1.21-1.79)].
    CONCLUSIONS: A less favorable balance of time spent in PA and ST (as characterized by a parsimonious PASTBI index approach) was associated with a higher risk of all-cause mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    针对儿童和青少年的24小时运动指南包括充足睡眠的建议,中等至剧烈的身体活动(MVPA)和久坐行为(SB)。然而,是否符合这些24小时运动指南的青少年患高血压(HBP)的可能性较小尚未确定.本研究评估了在10-17岁之间(13.2±2.4岁,996名青少年的学校样本中,符合24小时运动指南与HBP之间的关联。55.4%的女孩)。使用数字示波装置测量血压,睡觉时,使用Baecke问卷测量MVPA和SB。24小时运动指南与HBP之间的关联是使用针对性别进行调整的二元逻辑回归进行的。年龄,社会经济地位,和体重指数。观察到少于1%的样品符合三个24小时移动指南。与不符合任何指南的青少年(27.2%)相比,符合所有三个运动24小时指南的青少年的HBP患病率较低(11.1%)。个人24小时运动指南分析表明,睡眠充足的青少年HBP的可能性降低了35%(OR=0.65;95%CI0.46-0.91)。符合睡眠指南与符合MVPA(OR=0.69;95%CI0.50-0.95)或SB(OR=0.67;95%CI0.48-0.94)与HBP呈负相关。符合两个或三个24小时运动指南的青少年分别为47%(OR=0.53;95%CI0.29-0.98)和34%(OR=0.66;95%CI0.48-0.91)的HBP可能性较小。在青少年中,符合睡眠和24小时运动指南与HBP呈负相关.
    The 24-h movement guidelines for children and adolescents comprise recommendations for adequate sleep, moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary behaviour (SB). However, whether adolescents who meet these 24-h movement guidelines may be less likely to have high blood pressure (HBP) has not been established. The present study assessed the association between meeting 24-h movement guidelines and HBP in a school-based sample of 996 adolescents between 10-17 years (13.2 ± 2.4 years, 55.4% of girls). Blood pressure was measured using a digital oscillometric device, while sleep, MVPA and SB were measured using the Baecke questionnaire. The association between the 24-h movement guidelines and HBP was performed using binary logistic regression adjusted for sex, age, socioeconomic status, and body mass index. It was observed that less than 1% of the sample meet the three 24-h movement guidelines. The prevalence of HBP was lower in adolescents who meet all three movement 24-h guidelines (11.1%) compared to those who did not meet any guidelines (27.2%). Individual 24-h movement guidelines analysis showed that adolescents with adequate sleep were 35% less likely to have HBP (OR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.46-0.91). Meeting sleep guidelines combined with meeting MVPA (OR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.50-0.95) or SB (OR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.48-0.94) was inversely associated with HBP. Adolescents who meet two or three 24-h movement guidelines were respectively 47% (OR = 0.53; 95% CI 0.29-0.98) and 34% (OR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.48-0.91) less likely to have HBP. In adolescents, meeting sleep and 24-h movement guidelines were inversely associated with HBP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    跌倒,更具体地说,跌倒相关的伤害,对医疗保健系统来说是昂贵的,并且可能损害一个人的自主权。
    研究久坐行为与跌倒相关损伤的影响,以及久坐行为的变化如何影响跌倒相关损伤的风险。
    从基线到第一次随访,来自加拿大老龄化纵向研究(CLSA)队列的横截面和纵向数据分析。
    CLSA数据来自43,558名45-85岁的加拿大人。
    在基线和随访时,久坐行为时间被归类为低(<1,080分钟/周),中等(1,080-1,440),或高(>1,440)。通过老年人身体活动量表(PASE)估算久坐行为。在后续行动中,根据参与者在时间点之间的分类变化,将参与者分为久坐行为增加或减少/无变化.
    久坐行为与跌倒相关伤害相关,与年龄无关,性别,慢性疾病的数量,和总体力活动水平OR(95CI)1.10(1.05-1.15)。相比之下,久坐行为的改变与跌倒相关损伤1.00(0.92-1.01)的风险无关.
    对于40至80岁的人来说,较高的久坐行为与跌倒有关。然而,久坐行为的短期变化不会影响与伤害相关的跌倒风险。尽管有结果,流行病学研究需要更精确地测量久坐行为,以便更好地捕捉随时间的变化。
    UNASSIGNED: Falls, and more specifically, fall-related injuries, are costly to the healthcare system and can harm one\'s autonomy.
    UNASSIGNED: To study the impact of sedentary behaviour associated with fall-related injuries and how a change in sedentary behaviour may impact the risk of a fall-related injury.
    UNASSIGNED: From baseline to the first follow-up, cross-sectional and longitudinal data analysis from the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging (CLSA) cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: CLSA data from 43,558 Canadians aged 45-85 were included in this study.
    UNASSIGNED: At baseline and follow-up, sedentary behaviour time was categorized as low (<1,080 minutes/week), moderate (1,080-1,440), or high (>1,440). Sedentary behaviour was estimated via the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). At follow-up, participants were dichotomized as either increased or decreased/no change in sedentary behaviour according to their categorical change between time points.
    UNASSIGNED: Sedentary behaviour was associated with fall-related injuries independently of age, sex, number of chronic conditions, and total physical activity levels OR (95%CI) 1.10 (1.05-1.15). In contrast, a change in sedentary behaviour was not associated with the risk of fall-related injury 1.00 (0.92-1.01).
    UNASSIGNED: A higher level of sedentary behaviour is associated with injurious falls for people between 40 and 80 years old. However, a short-term change in sedentary behaviour does not influence the risk of injury-related falls. Despite the results, a more precise measure of sedentary behaviour is needed for epidemiology studies to capture changes over time better.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们在自由生活条件下评估人类的身体行为越准确,我们就越能更好地理解其与健康和福祉的关系。大腿磨损的加速度计可用于高精度地识别基本活动类型以及不同姿势。无需专门编程的用户友好的软件可以支持采用这种方法。本研究旨在评估两种新颖的无代码分类方法的分类精度,即SENS运动和ActiPASS。
    方法:38名健康成年人(30.8±9.6岁;53%的女性)在各种体育活动中在大腿上佩戴SENS运动加速度计(12.5Hz;±4g)。参与者在实验室中完成了强度不同的标准化活动。活动包括散步,跑步,骑自行车,坐着,站立,躺下.随后,参与者在实验室外进行不受限制的自由生活活动,同时使用胸部摄像头进行录像.使用预定义的标签方案对视频进行了注释,并将注释作为自由生活条件的参考。将SENS运动软件和ActiPASS软件的分类输出与参考标签进行比较。
    结果:共分析了63.6小时的活性数据。我们观察到两种分类算法及其各自在两种条件下的参考之间的高度一致性。在自由生活条件下,科恩的卡帕系数为SENS为0.86,ActiPASS为0.92。在所有活动类型中,SENS的平均平衡精度范围为0.81(骑自行车)至0.99(跑步),ActiPASS的平均平衡精度范围为0.92(步行)至0.99(久坐)。
    结论:研究表明,两种可用的无代码分类方法可用于准确识别基本的身体活动类型和姿势。我们的结果强调了基于相对较低采样频率数据的两种方法的准确性。分类方法表现出差异,在自由生活骑自行车(SENS)和慢速跑步机步行(ActiPASS)中观察到较低的敏感性。这两种方法都使用不同定义的活动类的不同集合,这可以解释观察到的差异。我们的结果支持使用SENS运动系统和两种无代码分类方法。
    BACKGROUND: The more accurate we can assess human physical behaviour in free-living conditions the better we can understand its relationship with health and wellbeing. Thigh-worn accelerometry can be used to identify basic activity types as well as different postures with high accuracy. User-friendly software without the need for specialized programming may support the adoption of this method. This study aims to evaluate the classification accuracy of two novel no-code classification methods, namely SENS motion and ActiPASS.
    METHODS: A sample of 38 healthy adults (30.8 ± 9.6 years; 53% female) wore the SENS motion accelerometer (12.5 Hz; ±4 g) on their thigh during various physical activities. Participants completed standardized activities with varying intensities in the laboratory. Activities included walking, running, cycling, sitting, standing, and lying down. Subsequently, participants performed unrestricted free-living activities outside of the laboratory while being video-recorded with a chest-mounted camera. Videos were annotated using a predefined labelling scheme and annotations served as a reference for the free-living condition. Classification output from the SENS motion software and ActiPASS software was compared to reference labels.
    RESULTS: A total of 63.6 h of activity data were analysed. We observed a high level of agreement between the two classification algorithms and their respective references in both conditions. In the free-living condition, Cohen\'s kappa coefficients were 0.86 for SENS and 0.92 for ActiPASS. The mean balanced accuracy ranged from 0.81 (cycling) to 0.99 (running) for SENS and from 0.92 (walking) to 0.99 (sedentary) for ActiPASS across all activity types.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that two available no-code classification methods can be used to accurately identify basic physical activity types and postures. Our results highlight the accuracy of both methods based on relatively low sampling frequency data. The classification methods showed differences in performance, with lower sensitivity observed in free-living cycling (SENS) and slow treadmill walking (ActiPASS). Both methods use different sets of activity classes with varying definitions, which may explain the observed differences. Our results support the use of the SENS motion system and both no-code classification methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号