sedentary behaviour

久坐行为
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:体力活动(PA),睡眠和久坐时间现在被认为是24小时的相互排斥和详尽的部分-如果PA降低,睡觉的时间,久坐或两者都必须增加,以便所有成分都等于24小时。时间使用流行病学的最新进展表明,我们不应该考虑时间使用领域(PA,睡眠和久坐时间)相互隔离,但就组成而言-24小时内时间使用域的混合。虽然已知相互关联的日常活动在糖尿病的管理中很重要,很少有研究调查了患有活动性糖尿病相关足部溃疡(DFU)的人的相关日常活动及其对伤口严重程度等重要结局的影响,血糖控制和健康相关生活质量(HRQoL)。这项可行性研究旨在确定在有DFU的人群中测量24小时使用时间数据的可接受性和实用性,及其与该人群重要结果指标的关联。
    方法:参与者佩戴手腕佩戴加速度计两周,并完成人口统计和HRQoL问卷。结果是参与者参与,报告的研究负担和价值水平以及成分数据分析作为评估24小时时间数据使用的方法学方法。
    结果:26名参与者报告研究负担较低,并对研究价值给予高度评价。该方案在招聘(81%)和保留率(86%)方面似乎是可行的。平均而言,参与者在久坐时间内相对久坐花费747、172和18分钟,轻度体力活动和中等至剧烈的活动,分别。睡眠似乎足够,参与者平均获得485分钟,但是睡眠质量明显较差,平均睡眠效率为75%。成分数据分析能够量化24小时使用时间与HRQoL的综合关联。
    结论:该方案提供了一种可接受的方法来收集DFU患者的24小时使用时间数据。作为24小时活性组合物的一部分来考虑和分析PA的努力可以在该临床人群中提供对PA的整体和现实的理解。
    BACKGROUND: Physical activity (PA), sleep and sedentary time are now recognised as mutually exclusive and exhaustive parts of the 24-h day-if PA decreases, time spent sleeping, being sedentary or both must increase so that all components equate to 24 h. Recent advances in time-use epidemiology suggest that we should not consider time-use domains (PA, sleep and sedentary time) in isolation from each other, but in terms of a composition-the mix of time-use domains across the 24-h day. While interrelated daily activities are known to be important in the management of diabetes mellitus, few studies have investigated the interrelated daily activities in people with an active diabetes-related foot ulcer (DFU) and their impact on important outcomes such as wound severity, blood glucose control and health-related quality of life (HRQoL). This feasibility study aims to determine the acceptability and practicality of measuring 24-h use of time data in people with a DFU and its associations on important outcome measures for this population.
    METHODS: Participants wore a wrist-worn accelerometer for two weeks and completed demographic and HRQoL questionnaires. Outcomes were participant engagement, reported levels of study burden and value and compositional data analysis as a methodological approach for evaluating 24-h use of time data.
    RESULTS: Twenty-six participants reported low levels of study burden and rated the study value highly. The protocol appears feasible in terms of recruitment (81%) and retention rate (86%). On average, participants were relatively sedentary spending 747, 172 and 18 min in sedentary time, light physical activity and moderate-to-vigorous activity, respectively. Sleep appeared adequate with participants obtaining an average of 485 min, but quality of sleep was notably poor with average sleep efficiency of 75%. Compositional data analysis was able to quantify the integrated associations of 24-h use of time with HRQoL.
    CONCLUSIONS: The protocol provides an acceptable method to collect 24-h use of time data in people with a DFU. Efforts to consider and analyse PA as part of a 24-h activity composition may provide holistic and realistic understandings of PA in this clinical population.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    针对儿童和青少年的24小时运动指南包括充足睡眠的建议,中等至剧烈的身体活动(MVPA)和久坐行为(SB)。然而,是否符合这些24小时运动指南的青少年患高血压(HBP)的可能性较小尚未确定.本研究评估了在10-17岁之间(13.2±2.4岁,996名青少年的学校样本中,符合24小时运动指南与HBP之间的关联。55.4%的女孩)。使用数字示波装置测量血压,睡觉时,使用Baecke问卷测量MVPA和SB。24小时运动指南与HBP之间的关联是使用针对性别进行调整的二元逻辑回归进行的。年龄,社会经济地位,和体重指数。观察到少于1%的样品符合三个24小时移动指南。与不符合任何指南的青少年(27.2%)相比,符合所有三个运动24小时指南的青少年的HBP患病率较低(11.1%)。个人24小时运动指南分析表明,睡眠充足的青少年HBP的可能性降低了35%(OR=0.65;95%CI0.46-0.91)。符合睡眠指南与符合MVPA(OR=0.69;95%CI0.50-0.95)或SB(OR=0.67;95%CI0.48-0.94)与HBP呈负相关。符合两个或三个24小时运动指南的青少年分别为47%(OR=0.53;95%CI0.29-0.98)和34%(OR=0.66;95%CI0.48-0.91)的HBP可能性较小。在青少年中,符合睡眠和24小时运动指南与HBP呈负相关.
    The 24-h movement guidelines for children and adolescents comprise recommendations for adequate sleep, moderate to vigorous physical activity (MVPA) and sedentary behaviour (SB). However, whether adolescents who meet these 24-h movement guidelines may be less likely to have high blood pressure (HBP) has not been established. The present study assessed the association between meeting 24-h movement guidelines and HBP in a school-based sample of 996 adolescents between 10-17 years (13.2 ± 2.4 years, 55.4% of girls). Blood pressure was measured using a digital oscillometric device, while sleep, MVPA and SB were measured using the Baecke questionnaire. The association between the 24-h movement guidelines and HBP was performed using binary logistic regression adjusted for sex, age, socioeconomic status, and body mass index. It was observed that less than 1% of the sample meet the three 24-h movement guidelines. The prevalence of HBP was lower in adolescents who meet all three movement 24-h guidelines (11.1%) compared to those who did not meet any guidelines (27.2%). Individual 24-h movement guidelines analysis showed that adolescents with adequate sleep were 35% less likely to have HBP (OR = 0.65; 95% CI 0.46-0.91). Meeting sleep guidelines combined with meeting MVPA (OR = 0.69; 95% CI 0.50-0.95) or SB (OR = 0.67; 95% CI 0.48-0.94) was inversely associated with HBP. Adolescents who meet two or three 24-h movement guidelines were respectively 47% (OR = 0.53; 95% CI 0.29-0.98) and 34% (OR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.48-0.91) less likely to have HBP. In adolescents, meeting sleep and 24-h movement guidelines were inversely associated with HBP.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    跌倒,更具体地说,跌倒相关的伤害,对医疗保健系统来说是昂贵的,并且可能损害一个人的自主权。
    研究久坐行为与跌倒相关损伤的影响,以及久坐行为的变化如何影响跌倒相关损伤的风险。
    从基线到第一次随访,来自加拿大老龄化纵向研究(CLSA)队列的横截面和纵向数据分析。
    CLSA数据来自43,558名45-85岁的加拿大人。
    在基线和随访时,久坐行为时间被归类为低(<1,080分钟/周),中等(1,080-1,440),或高(>1,440)。通过老年人身体活动量表(PASE)估算久坐行为。在后续行动中,根据参与者在时间点之间的分类变化,将参与者分为久坐行为增加或减少/无变化.
    久坐行为与跌倒相关伤害相关,与年龄无关,性别,慢性疾病的数量,和总体力活动水平OR(95CI)1.10(1.05-1.15)。相比之下,久坐行为的改变与跌倒相关损伤1.00(0.92-1.01)的风险无关.
    对于40至80岁的人来说,较高的久坐行为与跌倒有关。然而,久坐行为的短期变化不会影响与伤害相关的跌倒风险。尽管有结果,流行病学研究需要更精确地测量久坐行为,以便更好地捕捉随时间的变化。
    UNASSIGNED: Falls, and more specifically, fall-related injuries, are costly to the healthcare system and can harm one\'s autonomy.
    UNASSIGNED: To study the impact of sedentary behaviour associated with fall-related injuries and how a change in sedentary behaviour may impact the risk of a fall-related injury.
    UNASSIGNED: From baseline to the first follow-up, cross-sectional and longitudinal data analysis from the Canadian Longitudinal Study of Aging (CLSA) cohort.
    UNASSIGNED: CLSA data from 43,558 Canadians aged 45-85 were included in this study.
    UNASSIGNED: At baseline and follow-up, sedentary behaviour time was categorized as low (<1,080 minutes/week), moderate (1,080-1,440), or high (>1,440). Sedentary behaviour was estimated via the Physical Activity Scale for the Elderly (PASE). At follow-up, participants were dichotomized as either increased or decreased/no change in sedentary behaviour according to their categorical change between time points.
    UNASSIGNED: Sedentary behaviour was associated with fall-related injuries independently of age, sex, number of chronic conditions, and total physical activity levels OR (95%CI) 1.10 (1.05-1.15). In contrast, a change in sedentary behaviour was not associated with the risk of fall-related injury 1.00 (0.92-1.01).
    UNASSIGNED: A higher level of sedentary behaviour is associated with injurious falls for people between 40 and 80 years old. However, a short-term change in sedentary behaviour does not influence the risk of injury-related falls. Despite the results, a more precise measure of sedentary behaviour is needed for epidemiology studies to capture changes over time better.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:我们在自由生活条件下评估人类的身体行为越准确,我们就越能更好地理解其与健康和福祉的关系。大腿磨损的加速度计可用于高精度地识别基本活动类型以及不同姿势。无需专门编程的用户友好的软件可以支持采用这种方法。本研究旨在评估两种新颖的无代码分类方法的分类精度,即SENS运动和ActiPASS。
    方法:38名健康成年人(30.8±9.6岁;53%的女性)在各种体育活动中在大腿上佩戴SENS运动加速度计(12.5Hz;±4g)。参与者在实验室中完成了强度不同的标准化活动。活动包括散步,跑步,骑自行车,坐着,站立,躺下.随后,参与者在实验室外进行不受限制的自由生活活动,同时使用胸部摄像头进行录像.使用预定义的标签方案对视频进行了注释,并将注释作为自由生活条件的参考。将SENS运动软件和ActiPASS软件的分类输出与参考标签进行比较。
    结果:共分析了63.6小时的活性数据。我们观察到两种分类算法及其各自在两种条件下的参考之间的高度一致性。在自由生活条件下,科恩的卡帕系数为SENS为0.86,ActiPASS为0.92。在所有活动类型中,SENS的平均平衡精度范围为0.81(骑自行车)至0.99(跑步),ActiPASS的平均平衡精度范围为0.92(步行)至0.99(久坐)。
    结论:研究表明,两种可用的无代码分类方法可用于准确识别基本的身体活动类型和姿势。我们的结果强调了基于相对较低采样频率数据的两种方法的准确性。分类方法表现出差异,在自由生活骑自行车(SENS)和慢速跑步机步行(ActiPASS)中观察到较低的敏感性。这两种方法都使用不同定义的活动类的不同集合,这可以解释观察到的差异。我们的结果支持使用SENS运动系统和两种无代码分类方法。
    BACKGROUND: The more accurate we can assess human physical behaviour in free-living conditions the better we can understand its relationship with health and wellbeing. Thigh-worn accelerometry can be used to identify basic activity types as well as different postures with high accuracy. User-friendly software without the need for specialized programming may support the adoption of this method. This study aims to evaluate the classification accuracy of two novel no-code classification methods, namely SENS motion and ActiPASS.
    METHODS: A sample of 38 healthy adults (30.8 ± 9.6 years; 53% female) wore the SENS motion accelerometer (12.5 Hz; ±4 g) on their thigh during various physical activities. Participants completed standardized activities with varying intensities in the laboratory. Activities included walking, running, cycling, sitting, standing, and lying down. Subsequently, participants performed unrestricted free-living activities outside of the laboratory while being video-recorded with a chest-mounted camera. Videos were annotated using a predefined labelling scheme and annotations served as a reference for the free-living condition. Classification output from the SENS motion software and ActiPASS software was compared to reference labels.
    RESULTS: A total of 63.6 h of activity data were analysed. We observed a high level of agreement between the two classification algorithms and their respective references in both conditions. In the free-living condition, Cohen\'s kappa coefficients were 0.86 for SENS and 0.92 for ActiPASS. The mean balanced accuracy ranged from 0.81 (cycling) to 0.99 (running) for SENS and from 0.92 (walking) to 0.99 (sedentary) for ActiPASS across all activity types.
    CONCLUSIONS: The study shows that two available no-code classification methods can be used to accurately identify basic physical activity types and postures. Our results highlight the accuracy of both methods based on relatively low sampling frequency data. The classification methods showed differences in performance, with lower sensitivity observed in free-living cycling (SENS) and slow treadmill walking (ActiPASS). Both methods use different sets of activity classes with varying definitions, which may explain the observed differences. Our results support the use of the SENS motion system and both no-code classification methods.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在2型糖尿病(T2DM)患者中,考虑久坐行为的手力量对糖尿病管理的影响尚不清楚。这项研究的目的是检查手部力量对HbA1c的影响,根据日本T2DM患者久坐行为的持续时间,按组划分的体重指数(BMI)和身体成分。
    在这次回顾中,横截面,单中心研究,按体重(GS)和久坐时间(ST)标准化的手力量,在2021年总共270名日本2型糖尿病门诊患者中获得并分析。将患者分为四类中位数(高GS和低GS,以及长短ST),良好控制HbA1c的优势比(ORs),BMI,采用logistic回归模型对腰围(WC)和腹内脂肪(IAF)进行调查.
    与低GS/长ST组相比,高GS/短ST组的控制HbA1c明显更高(OR=2.01;95%CI:1.00,4.03;P=0.049)。高GS/短ST和高GS/长ST组对控制的BMI有明显较高的OR,WC和IAF与低GS/长ST组的OR比拟。此外,从低GS/长ST开始,OR显着增加,呈正趋势,低GS/短ST,高GS/长ST,所有模型的高GS/短ST(趋势P<0.001)。
    手部力量,久坐行为的适度影响,可能有助于T2DM患者的糖尿病管理。
    UNASSIGNED: The impact of hand strength in consideration of sedentary behaviour on diabetes management in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) is unclear. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of hand strength on HbA1c, body mass index (BMI) and body composition by group according to the duration of sedentary behaviour in Japanese patients with T2DM.
    UNASSIGNED: In this retrospective, cross-sectional, single-centre study, hand strength standardised by bodyweight (GS) and sedentary time (ST), were obtained and analysed in a total of 270 Japanese T2DM outpatients in 2021. After dividing the patients into four categories of median values (high and low GS, and long and short ST), odds ratios (ORs) for good control of HbA1c, BMI, waist circumference (WC) and intra-abdominal fat (IAF) were investigated using logistic regression models.
    UNASSIGNED: The high GS/short ST group was found to have a significantly higher (OR = 2.01; 95% CI: 1.00, 4.03; P = 0.049) for controlled HbA1c compared with that of the low GS/long ST group. The high GS/short ST and the high GS/long ST groups had significantly higher ORs for controlled BMI, WC and IAF compared with the OR of the low GS/long ST group. In addition, the ORs were significantly increased with a positive trend in order from low GS/long ST, low GS/short ST, high GS/long ST, to high GS/short ST in all models (P < 0.001 for trend).
    UNASSIGNED: Hand strength, with modest effects from sedentary behaviour, could be helpful for diabetes management in T2DM patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:了解减轻久坐时间与死亡率之间的关联所需的特定强度运动量可能有助于提供个性化处方和行为咨询。在这里,我们研究了久坐时间和特定强度体力活动与全因死亡率和心血管疾病(CVD)死亡率的联合相关性.
    方法:前瞻性队列研究包括来自英国Biobank的73,729名成年人,他们的主要手腕上佩戴了AxivityAX3加速度计至少3天,作为一个周末的一天,2013年6月至2015年12月。我们考虑了每个强度带中久坐时间和身体活动的中间值,以确定减弱久坐时间与死亡率之间关联所需的身体活动量。
    结果:在中位数为6.9年的随访期间(628,807人年),我们记录了1521人死亡,包括388来自CVD。任何强度的体力活动都会减弱久坐时间与死亡率的不利关系。总的来说,每天至少有6分钟的剧烈体力活动,30分钟/天的MVPA,64分钟/天的适度体力活动,或163分钟/天的轻度体力活动(根据其他强度相互调整)减弱了久坐时间与死亡率之间的关联。仅在MVPA低的参与者中,久坐时间长与CVD死亡率风险高相关(HR1.96;95%CI1.23至3.14)。
    结论:每种体力活动强度的不同量可能会减弱久坐时间与死亡率之间的关联。
    OBJECTIVE: Understanding the amounts of intensity-specific movement needed to attenuate the association between sedentary time and mortality may help to inform personalized prescription and behavioral counselling. Herein, we examined the joint associations of sedentary time and intensity-specific physical activity with all-cause and cardiovascular disease (CVD) mortality.
    METHODS: Prospective cohort study including 73,729 adults from the UK Biobank who wore an Axivity AX3 accelerometer on their dominant wrist for at least 3 days, being one a weekend day, between June 2013 and December 2015. We considered the median tertile values of sedentary time and physical activity in each intensity band to determine the amount of physical activity needed to attenuate the association between sedentary time and mortality.
    RESULTS: During a median of 6.9 years of follow-up (628,807 person-years), we documented 1521 deaths, including 388 from CVD. Physical activity of any intensity attenuated the detrimental association of sedentary time with mortality. Overall, at least a median of 6 min/day of vigorous physical activity, 30 min/day of MVPA, 64 min/day of moderate physical activity, or 163 min/day of light physical activity (mutually-adjusted for other intensities) attenuated the association between sedentary time and mortality. High sedentary time was associated with higher risk of CVD mortality only among participants with low MVPA (HR 1.96; 95% CI 1.23 to 3.14).
    CONCLUSIONS: Different amounts of each physical activity intensity may attenuate the association between high sedentary time and mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在调查社区中老年女性中加速度计测量的身体活动(PA)和久坐行为(SB)与身体功能(PF)之间的关系。
    方法:本研究包括1,113名社区居住的老年女性,平均年龄为65±2岁。我们采用线性回归分析来研究PA和SB模式与PF之间的关系。PA变量由总PA时间组成,预测PA时间(持续等于或超过10分钟的连续PA),和零星的PA时间(持续少于10分钟的连续PA)。SB变量包括总SB时间,30分钟的SB(持续等于或超过30分钟的连续SB),和60分钟的SB(持续等于或超过60分钟的连续SB)。PF变量包括手握强度(HGS),闭眼单腿站立测试(OLSTEC),通常的步行速度(UWS),最大步行速度(MWS)和椅子站立时间(CT)。探讨中强强度PA(MVPA)和SB对PF的联合作用,我们将老年妇女参与SB和MVPA的持续时间分为不同的组合:低MVPA和高SB,低MVPA和低SB,高MVPA和高SB,高MVPA和低SB。
    结果:研究表明,30分钟的SB和CT之间存在显着关联,在调整总MVPA时间后仍然存在(P=0.021)。发现总MVPA和blotedMVPA与更好的UWS呈正相关,MWS,CT,和PFZ分数。当使用低MVPA和高SB的组合作为参考时,高MVPA和高SB组的PF回归系数上升了1.32(P<0.001),高MVPA和低SB组的PF回归系数上升了1.13(P<0.001)。
    结论:观察到下肢功能较差与延长,老年妇女不间断的SB,而不是总的SB时间。同时,MVPA参与不足也可能是导致老年女性PF较差的一个关键因素.参与更长的持续时间和更高强度的PA,例如持续至少10分钟或更长时间的MVPA发作,可能有助于更好的PF。
    BACKGROUND: This study aimed to investigate the relationships between accelerometer-measured physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) with physical function (PF) among older Chinese women in the community.
    METHODS: The present study comprised 1,113 community-dwelling older females, with an average age of 65 ± 2 years. We employed a linear regression analysis to investigate the relationship between patterns of PA and SB with PF. PA variables consisted of total PA time, bouted PA time (a continuous PA that lasts equal to or more than 10 min), and sporadic PA time (a continuous PA that lasts less than 10 min). SB variables included total SB time, 30-min bout of SB (a continuous SB that lasts equal to or more than 30 min), and 60-min bout of SB (a continuous SB that lasts equal to or more than 60 min). PF variables comprised handgrip strength (HGS), one-legged stance test with eyes closed (OLSTEC), usual walking speed (UWS), maximum walking speed (MWS) and chair-stand time (CT). To explore the joint effects of moderate-to-vigorous-intensity PA (MVPA) and SB on PF, we divided the duration of SB and MVPA participation in older women into different combinations: low MVPA & high SB, low MVPA & low SB, high MVPA & high SB, high MVPA & low SB.
    RESULTS: The study revealed a significant association between 30-min bout of SB and CT, which remained after adjusting for total MVPA time (P = 0.021). Both total MVPA and bouted MVPA were found to be positively associated with better UWS, MWS, CT, and PF Z-score. When the combination of low MVPA & high SB was used as a reference, the regression coefficients for PF ascended by 1.32 (P < 0.001) in the high MVPA & high SB group and by 1.13 (P < 0.001) in the high MVPA & low SB group.
    CONCLUSIONS: A significant association was observed between poorer lower limb function and prolonged, uninterrupted SB in older women, rather than with the total SB time. Concurrently, the insufficient engagement in MVPA may also be a crucial factor contributing to poorer PF in older women. Engaging in longer durations and higher intensity of PA, such as bouts of MVPA lasting a minimum of 10 min or longer, may contribute to better PF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:调查身体位置如何随着轻度体力活动(PA)“零食”(LIPAS,交替坐着和站着,连续步行或站立)与不间断长时间坐着相比会影响超重和肥胖的年轻人的葡萄糖代谢和心率变异性(HRV)参数。
    方法:我们进行了一项四组随机对照交叉试验。在8小时的模拟工作日中测试了以下条件:不间断的长时间坐着(SIT),交替坐着和站着(坐着;总共2.5小时),连续站立(STAND),和连续步行(1.0mph;步行)。主要结果是调查身体位置的变化(交替坐着和站着,连续行走或站立)与不间断坐着相比会影响平均8小时葡萄糖代谢。次要结果包括对餐后2小时葡萄糖浓度的影响,以及8小时/24小时心率和HRV参数,在各自的学习武器中。在禁食状态下从过度封闭的耳垂抽取毛细血管血样,在每次试验干预期间每小时抽取一次,方法是用刺血针穿刺耳垂并收集20μL血液(BiosenS-LineLab;EKF诊断,Barleben,德国)。HRV评估24小时,包括8小时干预阶段,和通过动态心电图的原位阶段。在四次试验访问期间,所有参与者都接受了相同的标准化非相对早餐和午餐。
    结果:17个人(8名女性,平均年龄23.4±3.3岁,体重指数29.7±3.8kg/m2,糖化血红蛋白水平34.8±3.1mmol/mol[5.4±0.3%],体脂31.8±8.2%)完成了所有四个试验组。与SIT(89.4±6.8mg/dL)相比,在所有其他条件下,8小时平均葡萄糖较低(p<0.05),这与WALK(86.3±5.2mg/dL;p=0.034)相比具有统计学意义。与SIT相比,WALK早餐后两小时的餐后葡萄糖降低了约7%(p=0.002)。此外,观察到对有利于光强度步行的HRV参数的显着时间×条件影响(p<0.001)。
    结论:在超重和肥胖的年轻成年人的8小时工作环境中,替代和中断长时间坐着的光强度步行显示出显著的降血糖作用和改善的HRV。
    OBJECTIVE: To investigate how a change in body position with light-intensity physical activity (PA) \'snacks\' (LIPAS, alternate sitting and standing, walking or standing continuously) compared with uninterrupted prolonged sitting affects glucose metabolism and heart rate variability (HRV) parameters in young adults with overweight and obesity.
    METHODS: We conducted a four-arm randomized controlled crossover trial. The following conditions were tested during an 8-h simulated workday: uninterrupted prolonged sitting (SIT), alternate sitting and standing (SIT-STAND; 2.5 h total), continuous standing (STAND), and continuous walking (1.0 mph; WALK). The primary outcome was to investigate how a change in body position (alternate sitting and standing, walking or standing continuously) compared with uninterrupted sitting affects mean 8-h glucose metabolism. Secondary outcomes included the effects on 2-h postprandial glucose concentrations, as well as on 8-h/24-h heart rate and HRV parameters, in the respective study arms. Capillary blood samples were drawn from an hyperemised earlobe in the fasted state and once every hour during each trial intervention by puncturing the earlobe with a lancet and collecting 20 μL of blood (Biosen S-Line Lab+; EKF diagnostics, Barleben, Germany). HRV was assessed for 24 h including the 8-h intervention phase, and a home phase by means of a Holter electrocardiogram. All participants received the same standardized non-relativised breakfast and lunch during the four trial visits.
    RESULTS: Seventeen individuals (eight women, mean age 23.4 ± 3.3 years, body mass index 29.7 ± 3.8 kg/m2, glycated haemoglobin level 34.8 ± 3.1 mmol/mol [5.4 ± 0.3%], body fat 31.8 ± 8.2%) completed all four trial arms. Compared with SIT (89.4 ± 6.8 mg/dL), 8-h mean glucose was lower in all other conditions (p < 0.05) and this was statistically significant compared with WALK (86.3 ± 5.2 mg/dL; p = 0.034). Two-hour postprandial glucose after breakfast was approximately 7% lower for WALK compared with SIT (p = 0.002). Furthermore, significant time × condition effects on HRV parameters favouring light-intensity walking were observed (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Replacement and interruption of prolonged sitting with light-intensity walking showed a significant blood glucose-lowering effect and improved HRV during an 8-h work environment in young adults with overweight and obesity.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项研究检查了与轮班工人和非轮班工人相比,生态瞬时评估(EMA)报告的身体活动和久坐时间的标准有效性。澳大利亚工人(n=102)通过移动EMA应用程序收到提示,并在右臀部佩戴Actigraph加速度计7-10天。参与者每天在手机上每隔3小时收到五次EMA提示。发送给轮班工人(SW-T)的EMA提示是根据他们的工作时间表量身定制的。非轮班工人(NSW-S)在标准化时间收到提示。为了评估标准的有效性,使用EMA报告的活动与Actigraph加速度计活动计数和步数的关联.参与者为36±11岁,58%为女性。在参与者报告身体活动的场合,每分钟加速度计数(CPM)和步数明显更高(β=1184CPM,CI95%:1034,1334;β=20.9步,CI95%:18.2,23.6)高于其他EMA活动。EMA报告坐着时的加速度计数和步数低于未报告坐着时。我们的研究表明,EMA报告的身体活动和久坐时间与加速度计得出的数据显着相关。因此,EMA可以被认为是用加速度计评估轮班工人的运动相关行为,以提供丰富的上下文数据。
    This study examined the criterion validity of an ecological momentary assessment (EMA)-reported physical activity and sedentary time compared with accelerometry in shift workers and non-shift workers. Australian workers (n = 102) received prompts through a mobile EMA app and wore the Actigraph accelerometer on the right hip for 7-10 days. Participants received five EMA prompts per day at 3-hour intervals on their mobile phones. EMA prompts sent to shift workers (SW-T) were tailored according to their work schedule. Non-shift workers (NSW-S) received prompts at standardised times. To assess criterion validity, the association of EMA-reported activities and the Actigraph accelerometer activity counts and number of steps were used. Participants were 36 ± 11 years and 58% were female. On occasions where participants reported physical activity, acceleration counts per minute (CPM) and steps were significantly higher (β = 1184 CPM, CI 95%: 1034, 1334; β = 20.9 steps, CI 95%: 18.2, 23.6) than each of the other EMA activities. Acceleration counts and steps were lower when sitting was reported than when no sitting was reported by EMA. Our study showed that EMA-reported physical activity and sedentary time was significantly associated with accelerometer-derived data. Therefore, EMA can be considered to assess shift workers\' movement-related behaviours with accelerometers to provide rich contextual data.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    本研究旨在评估Fitbit设备在即时适应性干预(JITAI)和基于事件的生态瞬时评估(EMA)研究背景下对实时身体活动(PA)和久坐行为(SB)监测的适用性。
    来自比利时和捷克共和国的37名成年人(18-65岁)和32名老年人(65岁以上)同时佩戴四种设备3天:两种Fitbit型号在手腕上,臀部的ActiGraphGT3X+和大腿的ActivPAL。准确度测量包括平均(绝对)误差和平均(绝对)百分比误差。使用Lin的一致性相关系数和Bland-Altman分析评估并发有效性。与ActiGraph相比,计算了Fitbit对检测不同阈值和持续时间的步进事件的敏感性和特异性,而ROC曲线分析确定了根据ActivPAL检测久坐事件的最佳Fitbit阈值。
    与ActiGraph相比,Fitbits在短时间内测量步骤方面表现出了有效性。除了老年人的步速超过120步/分钟外,两种Fitbit模型都检测到成年人和老年人的踏步发作,敏感性和特异性超过87%和97%,分别。识别长时间坐姿发作的最佳临界值达到了超过93%和89%的敏感性和特异性,分别。
    本研究提供了在JITAI和基于事件的EMA研究中使用Fitbit设备的实际见解。Fitbits在检测短暂的踏步和SB中的合理准确性使其适合在PA或SB感兴趣的事件后触发JITAI提示或EMA问卷。
    UNASSIGNED: This study aims to assess the suitability of Fitbit devices for real-time physical activity (PA) and sedentary behaviour (SB) monitoring in the context of just-in-time adaptive interventions (JITAIs) and event-based ecological momentary assessment (EMA) studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Thirty-seven adults (18-65 years) and 32 older adults (65+) from Belgium and the Czech Republic wore four devices simultaneously for 3 days: two Fitbit models on the wrist, an ActiGraph GT3X+ at the hip and an ActivPAL at the thigh. Accuracy measures included mean (absolute) error and mean (absolute) percentage error. Concurrent validity was assessed using Lin\'s concordance correlation coefficient and Bland-Altman analyses. Fitbit\'s sensitivity and specificity for detecting stepping events across different thresholds and durations were calculated compared to ActiGraph, while ROC curve analyses identified optimal Fitbit thresholds for detecting sedentary events according to ActivPAL.
    UNASSIGNED: Fitbits demonstrated validity in measuring steps on a short time scale compared to ActiGraph. Except for stepping above 120 steps/min in older adults, both Fitbit models detected stepping bouts in adults and older adults with sensitivities and specificities exceeding 87% and 97%, respectively. Optimal cut-off values for identifying prolonged sitting bouts achieved sensitivities and specificities greater than 93% and 89%, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: This study provides practical insights into using Fitbit devices in JITAIs and event-based EMA studies among adults and older adults. Fitbits\' reasonable accuracy in detecting short bouts of stepping and SB makes them suitable for triggering JITAI prompts or EMA questionnaires following a PA or SB event of interest.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号