risk score

风险评分
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:越来越多的证据表明游离脂肪酸(FFA)与妊娠期糖尿病(GDM)有关。然而,大多数研究集中在几种特定类型的FFA上,例如α-亚麻酸(C18:3n3)和花生四烯酸(C20:4n6)或总水平的FFA。
    目的:本研究旨在检验孕早期各种FFA与GDM风险之间的关系。
    方法:参与者来自舟山孕妇队列(ZWPC)。进行了1:2巢式病例对照研究:按年龄将50名GDM母亲与100名无GDM母亲相匹配,孕前体重指数(BMI),月口服葡萄糖耐量试验(OGTT)和奇偶校验。37个FFA(包括17个饱和脂肪酸(SFA),8单不饱和脂肪酸(MUFA),通过气相色谱-质谱(GC-MS)测试了孕早期母体血浆中的10种多不饱和脂肪酸(PUFA)和2种反式脂肪酸(TFA))。使用条件逻辑回归模型评估FFA与GDM风险的相关性。
    结果:9个FFA分别与GDM风险增加相关(P<0.05),4种FFA分别与GDM风险降低相关(P<0.05)。SFA风险评分与更高的GDM风险相关(OR=1.34,95%CI:1.12-1.60),以及UFA风险评分(OR=1.26,95%CI:1.11-1.44),MUFA风险评分(OR=1.70,95CI:1.27-2.26),PUFA风险评分(OR=1.32,95CI:1.09-1.59)和TFA风险评分(OR=2.51,95CI:1.23-5.13)。此外,检测了不同类型FFA风险评分对GDM的联合影响.例如,与SFA和UFA风险评分低的人群相比,SFA和UFA风险评分高的女性患GDM的风险最高(OR=8.53,95CI:2.41-30.24),而SFA风险评分低、UFA风险评分高、SFA风险评分高、UFA风险评分低的风险比分别为6.37(95CI:1.33-30.53)和4.25(95CI:0.97-18.70),分别。
    结论:孕早期孕妇FFA与GDM风险呈正相关。此外,FFA对GDM风险有共同作用。
    结论:孕早期FFA水平升高会增加GDM的风险。
    BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence shows that free fatty acids (FFA) are associated with gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM). However, most of the studies focus on a few specific types of FFA, such as α-linolenic acid (C18:3n3) and Arachidonic acid (C20:4n6) or a total level of FFA.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to test the association between a variety of FFAs during the first trimester and the risk of GDM.
    METHODS: The participants came from the Zhoushan Pregnant Women Cohort (ZWPC). A 1:2 nested case-control study was conducted: fifty mothers with GDM were matched with 100 mothers without GDM by age, pre-pregnancy body mass index (BMI), month of oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT) and parity. Thirty-seven FFAs (including 17 saturated fatty acids (SFA), 8 monounsaturated fatty acids (MUFA), 10 polyunsaturated fatty acids (PUFA) and 2 trans fatty acids (TFA)) in maternal plasma during the first trimester were tested by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS). Conditional logistic regression models were performed to assess the associations of FFA with the risk of GDM.
    RESULTS: Nine FFAs were respectively associated with an increased risk of GDM (P < 0.05), and four FFAs were respectively associated with a decreased risk of GDM (P < 0.05). SFA risk score was associated with a greater risk of GDM (OR = 1.34, 95% CI: 1.12-1.60), as well as UFA risk score (OR = 1.26, 95% CI: 1.11-1.44), MUFA risk score (OR = 1.70, 95%CI: 1.27-2.26), PUFA risk score (OR = 1.32, 95%CI: 1.09-1.59) and TFA risk score (OR = 2.51, 95%CI: 1.23-5.13). Moreover, joint effects between different types of FFA risk scores on GDM were detected. For instance, compared with those with low risk scores of SFA and UFA, women with high risk scores of SFA and UFA had the highest risk of GDM (OR = 8.53, 95%CI: 2.41-30.24), while the Odds ratio in those with a low risk score of SFA and high risk score of UFA and those with a high risk score of SFA and low risk score of UFA was 6.37 (95%CI:1.33- 30.53) and 4.25 (95%CI: 0.97-18.70), respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: Maternal FFAs during the first trimester were positively associated with the risk of GDM. Additionally, there were joint effects between FFAs on GDM risk.
    CONCLUSIONS: Elevated FFA levels in the first trimester increased the risk of GDM.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在房颤患者中,随访期间房颤和窦性心律的复发取决于心血管疾病过程和节律控制治疗之间的相互作用.随访时达到窦性心律的预测因素尚不清楚。
    方法:为了量化心血管疾病过程和节律结果之间的相互作用,在EAST-AFNET4生物分子研究中,在1586名患者中反映了与AF相关的心血管疾病过程的14种生物标志物(71岁,46%的女性)在基线时进行了量化。为每种生物标志物构建包括临床特征的混合逻辑回归模型。询问生物标志物与早期节律控制的相互作用。结果是12个月时的窦性心律。结果在24个月和外部数据集中进行了验证。
    结果:在12个月时,三种生物标志物的基线浓度较高与窦性心律的机会较低独立相关:血管生成素2(ANGPT2)(比值比[OR]0.76[95%置信区间0.65-0.89],p=0.001),骨形态发生蛋白10(BMP10)(OR0.83[0.71-0.97],p=0.017)和N末端B型利钠肽前体(NT-proBNP)(OR0.73[0.60-0.88],p=0.001)。24个月时的节律分析证实了该结果。早期节律控制与NT-proBNP的预测潜力相互作用(p相互作用=0.033)。在随机接受早期节律控制的患者中,NT-proBNP的预测作用降低(常规护理:OR0.64[0.51-0.80],p<0.001;早期节律控制:OR0.90[0.69-1.18],p=0.453)。外部验证证实,低浓度的ANGPT2,BMP10和NT-proBNP可以预测随访期间的窦性心律。
    结论:低浓度的ANGPT2、BMP10和NT-proBNP可识别房颤患者在随访期间可能达到窦性心律。在接受节律控制的患者中NT-proBNP的预测能力减弱。
    OBJECTIVE: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), recurrent AF and sinus rhythm during follow-up are determined by interactions between cardiovascular disease processes and rhythm-control therapy. Predictors of attaining sinus rhythm at follow-up are not well known.
    METHODS: To quantify the interaction between cardiovascular disease processes and rhythm outcomes, 14 biomarkers reflecting AF-related cardiovascular disease processes in 1586 patients in the EAST-AFNET 4 biomolecule study (71 years old, 46% women) were quantified at baseline. Mixed logistic regression models including clinical features were constructed for each biomarker. Biomarkers were interrogated for interaction with early rhythm control. Outcome was sinus rhythm at 12 months. Results were validated at 24 months and in external datasets.
    RESULTS: Higher baseline concentrations of three biomarkers were independently associated with a lower chance of sinus rhythm at 12 months: angiopoietin 2 (ANGPT2) (odds ratio [OR] 0.76 [95% confidence interval 0.65-0.89], p=0.001), bone morphogenetic protein 10 (BMP10) (OR 0.83 [0.71-0.97], p=0.017) and N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) (OR 0.73 [0.60-0.88], p=0.001). Analysis of rhythm at 24 months confirmed the results. Early rhythm control interacted with the predictive potential of NT-proBNP (pinteraction=0.033). The predictive effect of NT-proBNP was reduced in patients randomized to early rhythm control (usual care: OR 0.64 [0.51-0.80], p<0.001; early rhythm control: OR 0.90 [0.69-1.18], p=0.453). External validation confirmed that low concentrations of ANGPT2, BMP10 and NT-proBNP predict sinus rhythm during follow-up.
    CONCLUSIONS: Low concentrations of ANGPT2, BMP10 and NT-proBNP identify patients with AF who are likely to attain sinus rhythm during follow-up. The predictive ability of NT-proBNP is attenuated in patients receiving rhythm control.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    新生儿死亡率预测评分可以帮助临床医生及时做出临床决定,通过在需要时促进早期入院来挽救新生儿的生命。它还可以帮助减少不必要的录取。
    该研究旨在开发和验证阿姆哈拉地区公立医院28天内新生儿死亡的预后风险评分,埃塞俄比亚。
    该模型是在2021年7月至2022年1月期间,在六家医院使用经过验证的新生儿近错过评估量表和365名新生儿的前瞻性队列开发的。使用接收器工作特性曲线下的面积评估模型的准确性,校准带,和乐观的统计数据。使用500次重复自举技术进行内部验证。决策曲线分析用于评估模型的临床实用性。
    总共,365名新生儿中有63人死亡,新生儿死亡率为17.3%(95%CI:13.7-21.5)。确定了六个潜在的预测因子并将其包括在模型中:怀孕期间的贫血,妊娠高血压,胎龄小于37周,出生窒息,5分钟Apgar评分小于7,出生体重小于2500g。模型的AUC为84.5%(95%CI:78.8-90.2)。通过内部效度解释过拟合的模型预测能力为82%。决策曲线分析显示较高的临床效用表现。
    新生儿死亡率预测评分有助于早期发现,临床决策,and,最重要的是,及时对高危新生儿进行干预,最终拯救埃塞俄比亚的生命。
    主要发现:在埃塞俄比亚测试的新生儿死亡率预后风险评分具有很高的准确性,决策曲线分析显示临床效用表现增加。增加的知识:这里开发的工具可以帮助医疗保健提供者识别高危新生儿并做出及时的临床决定以挽救生命。对政策和行动的全球健康影响:这些发现有可能在当地情况下应用,以识别高风险新生儿并做出可以提高儿童存活率的治疗决定。
    UNASSIGNED: A neonatal mortality prediction score can assist clinicians in making timely clinical decisions to save neonates\' lives by facilitating earlier admissions where needed. It can also help reduce unnecessary admissions.
    UNASSIGNED: The study aimed to develop and validate a prognosis risk score for neonatal mortality within 28 days in public hospitals in the Amhara region, Ethiopia.
    UNASSIGNED: The model was developed using a validated neonatal near miss assessment scale and a prospective cohort of 365 near-miss neonates in six hospitals between July 2021 and January 2022. The model\'s accuracy was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, calibration belt, and the optimism statistic. Internal validation was performed using a 500-repeat bootstrapping technique. Decision curve analysis was used to evaluate the model\'s clinical utility.
    UNASSIGNED: In total, 63 of the 365 neonates died, giving a neonatal mortality rate of 17.3% (95% CI: 13.7-21.5). Six potential predictors were identified and included in the model: anemia during pregnancy, pregnancy-induced hypertension, gestational age less than 37 weeks, birth asphyxia, 5 min Apgar score less than 7, and birth weight less than 2500 g. The model\'s AUC was 84.5% (95% CI: 78.8-90.2). The model\'s predictive ability while accounting for overfitting via internal validity was 82%. The decision curve analysis showed higher clinical utility performance.
    UNASSIGNED: The neonatal mortality predictive score could aid in early detection, clinical decision-making, and, most importantly, timely interventions for high-risk neonates, ultimately saving lives in Ethiopia.
    Main findings: This prognosis risk score for neonatal mortality tested in Ethiopia had high performance accuracy and the decision curve analysis showed increased clinical utility performance.Added knowledge: The tool developed here can aid healthcare providers in identifying high-risk neonates and making timely clinical decisions to save lives.Global health impact for policy and action: The findings have the potential to be applied in local contexts to identify high-risk neonates and make treatment decisions that could improve child survival rates.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:可逆性认知虚弱(RCF)是预防无症状性认知障碍和依赖性的理想目标。本研究旨在开发和验证事件RCF的预测模型。
    方法:纳入2011-2013年中国健康与退休纵向研究的1230名年龄≥60岁的老年人作为训练组。改进的泊松回归和三种机器学习算法,包括极限梯度提升,利用支持向量机和随机森林建立预测模型。所有模型都在内部进行了五次交叉验证,并通过2013-2015年中国健康与退休纵向研究调查,使用时间验证方法进行外部评估。
    结果:RCF的发生率在训练集中为27.4%,在外部验证集中为27.5%。总共选择了13个重要的预测因子来开发模型,包括年龄,教育,与孩子接触,医疗保险,视力障碍,心脏病,药物类型,自我评估的健康,疼痛部位,孤独,自我药疗,夜间睡眠和自来水。对于训练集,所有模型均显示出可接受或近似可接受的判别(AUC0.683-0.809),但内部和外部验证的公平歧视(AUC0.568-0.666)。对于校准,在训练集中,只有改进的泊松回归和极限梯度提升是可以接受的。所有模型均具有可接受的总体预测性能和临床有用性。根据基于改良Poisson回归构建的风险评分工具,将老年人分为三组:低风险(≤24),中位风险(24-29)和高风险(>29)。
    结论:该风险工具可以帮助医疗保健提供者预测未来2年内老年人的事件RCF,促进早期识别RCF高危人群。GeriatrGerontolInt2024;••:••-•。
    OBJECTIVE: Reversible cognitive frailty (RCF) is an ideal target to prevent asymptomatic cognitive impairment and dependency. This study aimed to develop and validate prediction models for incident RCF.
    METHODS: A total of 1230 older adults aged ≥60 years from China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study 2011-2013 survey were included as the training set. The modified Poisson regression and three machine learning algorithms including eXtreme Gradient Boosting, support vector machine and random forest were used to develop prediction models. All models were evaluated internally with fivefold cross-validation, and evaluated externally using a temporal validation method through the China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study 2013-2015 survey.
    RESULTS: The incidence of RCF was 27.4% in the training set and 27.5% in the external validation set. A total of 13 important predictors were selected to develop the model, including age, education, contact with their children, medical insurance, vision impairment, heart diseases, medication types, self-rated health, pain locations, loneliness, self-medication, night-time sleep and having running water. All models showed acceptable or approximately acceptable discrimination (AUC 0.683-0.809) for the training set, but fair discrimination (AUC 0.568-0.666) for the internal and external validation. For calibration, only modified Poisson regression and eXtreme Gradient Boosting were acceptable in the training set. All models had acceptable overall prediction performance and clinical usefulness. Older adults were divided into three groups by the risk scoring tool constructed based on modified Poisson regression: low risk (≤24), median risk (24-29) and high risk (>29).
    CONCLUSIONS: This risk tool could assist healthcare providers to predict incident RCF among older adults in the next 2 years, facilitating early identification of a high-risk population of RCF. Geriatr Gerontol Int 2024; ••: ••-••.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    临床,胆管癌的诊断和治疗通常根据发生的位置而有所不同,研究很少考虑不同病理类型之间的差异。大型和中型肝内胆管的胆管癌大多是粘液性的,而在小型胆管中没有;粘液性肝外胆管癌也比粘液性肝内胆管癌更常见。然而,目前尚不清楚这些病理类型的差异是否与预后有关。
    从监测中分析了总共22509名患者的数据,流行病学,和最终结果计划数据库,其中22299例患者被诊断为常见的腺胆管癌,而210例被诊断为黏液性胆管癌。基于倾向得分匹配(PSM)分析,在这两组临床上,人口统计学,和治疗特征进行了对比。使用Cox和LASSO回归分析和Kaplan-Meier存活曲线分析数据。最终,我们建立了总生存期(OS)和癌症特异性生存期(CSS)相关的预后模型,并在试验和外部数据集进行了验证,并创建了列线图来预测这些患者的预后.
    粘液性胆管癌和腺胆管癌的预后无差异。因此,我们构建了可同时用于粘液性和胆管癌的预后模型和列线图。通过比较9个独立的关键特征,即年龄,肿瘤大小,原发性肿瘤的数量,AJCC阶段,Grade,淋巴结状态,转移,手术和化疗,计算每个个体的风险评分.通过在OS和CSS预后模型中整合这两种病理类型,可以在多个数据集上获得有效的预后预测结果(OS:AUC0.70-0.87;CSS:AUC0.74-0.89)。
    年龄,肿瘤大小,原发性肿瘤的数量,AJCC阶段,Grade,淋巴结状态,转移,手术和化疗是黏液性和普通胆管癌患者OS或CSS的独立预后因素。可同时用于粘液性和腺胆管癌的列线图在胆管癌的临床实践和管理中具有重要意义。
    UNASSIGNED: Clinically, the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma are generally different according to the location of occurrence, and the studies rarely consider the differences between different pathological types. Cholangiocarcinomas in large- and middle-sized intrahepatic bile ducts are mostly mucinous, while in small sized bile duct are not; mucinous extrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas are also more common than mucinous intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. However, it is unclear whether these pathological type differences are related to the prognosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Data of total 22509 patients was analyzed from Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program database out of which 22299 patients were diagnosed with common adeno cholangiocarcinoma while 210 were diagnosed with mucinous cholangiocarcinoma. Based on the propensity score matching (PSM) analysis, between these two groups\' clinical, demographic, and therapeutic features were contrasted. The data were analyzed using Cox and LASSO regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves. Ultimately, overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) related prognostic models were established and validated in test and external datasets and nomograms were created to forecast these patients\' prognosis.
    UNASSIGNED: There was no difference in prognosis between mucinous cholangiocarcinoma and adeno cholangiocarcinoma. Therefore, we constructed prognostic model and nomogram that can be used for mucinous and adeno cholangiocarcinoma at the same time. By comparing the 9 independent key characteristics i.e. Age, tumor size, the number of primary tumors, AJCC stage, Grade, lymph node status, metastasis, surgery and chemotherapy, risk scores were calculated for each individual. By integrating these two pathological types in OS and CSS prognostic models, effective prognosis prediction results could be achieved in multiple datasets (OS: AUC 0.70-0.87; CSS: AUC 0.74-0.89).
    UNASSIGNED: Age, tumor size, the number of primary tumors, AJCC stage, Grade, lymph node status, metastasis, surgery and chemotherapy are the independent prognostic factors in OS or CSS of the patients with mucinous and ordinary cholangiocarcinoma. Nomogram that can be used for mucinous and adeno cholangiocarcinoma at the same time is of significance in clinical practice and management of cholangiocarcinoma.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肺腺癌(LUAD)是世界上最常见和最致命的癌症之一。这表明迫切需要改进的预后工具。越来越多的研究强调了微小RNA(miRNA)及其在肿瘤发生和癌症进展中的调控功能。在这种情况下,我们进行了大量RNA和miRNA测序的广泛分析,以鉴定LUAD相关的预后基因.开发了一个基于11个miRNA调控和表面蛋白基因的风险评分系统,后来通过内部和外部使用癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)和基因表达综合(GEO)进行验证,分别。进一步的单细胞RNA测序分析揭示了肿瘤微环境中各种细胞亚群之间的显著相互作用。在内皮细胞和上皮细胞之间观察到最明显的差异。突变分析强调TP53是与风险评分相关的关键信号通路。这项研究强调了免疫抑制,与调节性T细胞(Tregs)呈正相关,与M1型巨噬细胞呈负相关,在高危LUAD患者中普遍存在。这些发现为LUAD患者的临床结果提供了一个有希望的预后工具,促进治疗策略的未来发展,并增强我们对LUAD中miRNAs调节功能的理解。
    Lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) is one of the most prevalent and lethal cancers worldwide, signifying a critical need for improved prognostic tools. A growing number of studies have highlighted the role of microRNAs (miRNAs) and their regulatory functions in tumorigenesis and cancer progression. In this context, we performed an extensive analysis of bulk RNA- and miRNA-sequencing to identify LUAD-associated prognostic genes. A risk score system based on 11 miRNA-regulated and surface-protein genes was developed, which was later validated by internally and externally using the Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO), respectively. Further single-cell RNA sequencing analysis revealed significant interactions between various cellular subpopulations within the tumor microenvironment, with the most pronounced differences observed between endothelial and epithelial cells. The mutational analysis highlighted TP53 as a key signaling pathway associated with the risk score. The study underscores that immune suppression, indicated by a positive association with regulatory T cells (Tregs) and an inverse correlation with M1-type macrophages, is prevalent in high-risk LUAD patients. These findings provide a promising prognostic tool for clinical outcomes of LUAD patients, facilitating future development of therapeutic strategies and enhancing our understanding of the regulatory function of miRNAs in LUAD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    乳腺癌(BRCA)是最常见的癌症类型,也是全球女性癌症相关死亡的第二大原因。骨转移是BRCA患者预后不良的指标。本研究旨在建立预测BRCA患者骨转移的预后评分模型。
    从基因表达综合(GEO)和癌症基因组图谱(TCGA)下载BRCA相关的RNA测序数据集和相应的临床信息。使用R软件的Limma软件包筛选差异表达基因(DEGs)。基于通过单变量Cox回归和最小绝对收缩和选择算子(LASSO)Cox回归鉴定的关键基因构建基于风险评分的预测模型。通过基因集变异分析(GSVA)和基因集富集分析(GSEA)分析BRCA患者的基因表达谱。对BRCA骨转移患者进行随机生存森林(RSF)分析,以确定关键的DEGs。
    基于DEG分析,共有677个基因被鉴定为与BRCA骨转移相关的基因。通过单变量Cox回归和LASSO回归,将28个DEGs鉴定为标记基因以开发预后模型。通过合并每个特定基因的表达值并用相应的估计回归系数对它们进行加权来创建每个患者的风险评分。根据中位风险评分将患者分为低风险组和高风险组。高危组的总生存期(OS)明显较低。受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线和多组学分析表明,该模型具有较高的训练/测试准确性和良好的临床预测价值。我们使用来自GEO数据库的额外数据来验证预后模型的鲁棒性,高危组的OS和曲线下面积(AUC)值较低,表明该模型对BRCA的预后具有很强的预测功效。
    基于通过对骨转移研究的多组学分析确定的28个关键DEGs,构建了预后预测模型。该模型可能为区分高危BRCA患者提供有希望的方法,并有助于BRCA患者的预后预测以及决策。
    UNASSIGNED: Breast cancer (BRCA) is the most common type of cancer and the second leading cause of cancer-related death in women all over the world. Metastasis to bone is an indicator of poor prognosis in BRCA patients. This study aimed to develop a prognostic score model for predicting bone metastasis in patients with BRCA.
    UNASSIGNED: BRCA-related RNA sequencing datasets and corresponding clinical information were downloaded from the Gene Expression Omnibus (GEO) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA). Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were screened using Limma package of R software. A risk score based predictive model was constructed based on the key genes identified through univariate Cox regression and the least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression. The gene expression profiles in BRCA patients were analyzed by gene set variation analysis (GSVA) and gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Random survival forest (RSF) analysis of BRCA patients with bone metastasis was conducted to identify the key DEGs.
    UNASSIGNED: Based on DEG analysis, a total of 677 genes were identified as genes related to bone metastasis in BRCA. By univariate Cox regression and LASSO regression, 28 DEGs were identified as signature genes to develop the prognostic model. A risk score for each patient was created by incorporating the expression values of each specific gene and weighting them with the corresponding estimated regression coefficients. Patients were divided into a low-risk and a high-risk group based on the median risk score. Overall survival (OS) was significantly lower in the high-risk group. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve and multi-omics analysis indicated that the model had high training/testing accuracy and a good clinical predictive value. We used extra data from GEO database to verify the robustness of the prognostic model, and the lower OS in high-risk group and area under the curve (AUC) value indicated the model had strong predictive efficacy for prognosis of BRCA.
    UNASSIGNED: A prognostic prediction model was constructed based on 28 key DEGs identified through multi-omics analysis of studies on bone metastasis. The model may provide a promising method for distinguishing the high-risk BRCA patients and help on decision making in addition to prognosis prediction for BRCA patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:目前尚不清楚专门用于预测感染性心内膜炎(IE)心脏手术后早期死亡率的风险评分是否优于欧洲心脏手术风险评估系统II(EuroSCOREII)。
    方法:回顾性回顾了欧洲多中心系列手术患者的围手术期数据和结果。仅保留具有已知病原体且没有所有考虑变量的缺失值的病例用于分析。IE手术后早期死亡率的EuroSCOREII和五个特定风险评分的比较验证-(1)STS-IE(IE胸外科医师协会);(2)PALSUSE(人工瓣膜,年龄≥70岁,大的心脏内破坏,葡萄球菌属,紧急手术,性别(女性),EuroSCORE≥10);(3)ANCLA(贫血,纽约心脏协会四级,临界状态,巨大的心脏内破坏,胸主动脉手术);(4)AEPEIII(EndocarditeInfectieuseII协会);(5)APORTEI(AnálissdelosfactoresPRONósticosenelTratamientoquirrúrgicodeEndocardicitisreceuting-operationplotandwerecarriedout.根据Hanley-McNeil方法以1:1比较曲线下面积(AUC)。还评估了APORTEI评分和EuroSCOREII对手术后30天死亡率预测的一致性。
    结果:来自五个欧洲大学附属中心的1,012名患者接受了1,036次心脏手术,术后30天死亡率为9.7%。在校准方面,所有IE特定风险评分均比EuroSCOREII取得了更好的结果;AEPEIII和APORTEI评分表现最佳。尽管校准不好,EuroSCOREII克服了每个特定风险评分的歧视(AUC,0.751vs.0.693或更小,p=0.01或更小)。对于高于/低于20%的预期死亡率,APORTEI评分与EuroSCOREII的预测一致性为86%.
    结论:EuroSCOREII对IE手术后30天死亡率的歧视高于5个已确定的IE特异性风险评分。AEPEIII和APORTEI评分在校准方面显示出最好的结果。
    BACKGROUND: It remains unclear today whether risk scores created specifically to predict early mortality after cardiac operations for infective endocarditis (IE) outperform or not the European System for Cardiac Operative Risk Evaluation II (EuroSCORE II).
    METHODS: Perioperative data and outcomes from a European multicenter series of patients undergoing surgery for definite IE were retrospectively reviewed. Only the cases with known pathogen and without missing values for all considered variables were retained for analyses. A comparative validation of EuroSCORE II and 5 specific risk scores for early mortality after surgery for IE-(1) STS-IE (Society of Thoracic Surgeons for IE); (2) PALSUSE (Prosthetic valve, Age ≥70, Large intracardiac destruction, Staphylococcus spp, Urgent surgery, Sex (female), EuroSCORE ≥10); (3) ANCLA (Anemia, New York Heart Association class IV, Critical state, Large intracardiac destruction, surgery on thoracic Aorta); (4) AEPEI II (Association pour l\'Étude et la Prévention de l\'Endocardite Infectieuse II); (5) APORTEI (Análisis de los factores PROnósticos en el Tratamiento quirúrgico de la Endocarditis Infecciosa)-was carried out using calibration plot and receiver-operating characteristic curve analysis. Areas under the curve (AUCs) were compared 1:1 according to the Hanley-McNeil\'s method. The agreement between APORTEI score and EuroSCORE II of the 30-day mortality prediction after surgery was also appraised.
    RESULTS: A total of 1,012 patients from 5 European university-affiliated centers underwent 1,036 cardiac operations, with a 30-day mortality after surgery of 9.7%. All IE-specific risk scores considered achieved better results than EuroSCORE II in terms of calibration; AEPEI II and APORTEI score showed the best performances. Despite poor calibration, EuroSCORE II overcame in discrimination every specific risk score (AUC, 0.751 vs 0.693 or less, P = .01 or less). For a higher/lesser than 20% expected mortality, the agreement of prediction between APORTEI score and EuroSCORE II was 86%.
    CONCLUSIONS: EuroSCORE II discrimination for 30-day mortality after surgery for IE was higher than 5 established IE-specific risk scores. AEPEI II and APORTEI score showed the best results in terms of calibration.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:非瓣膜性心房颤动(NVAF)患者口服抗凝药(OAC)可降低缺血性卒中风险,但可增加大出血风险。各种风险评分,如BLED,ATRIA,轨道,DOAC,已被提议评估接受OAC的NVAF患者的大出血风险。然而,关于日本NVAF患者出血风险分层的数据有限.
    方法:在来自J-RISKAF研究的16,098名NVAF患者中,日本五个主要AF登记处的综合数据(J-RHYTHM登记处,FushimiAF注册表,Shinken数据库,Keio医院间心血管研究,和北陆加AF注册表),我们分析了11,539例接受OAC的患者(中位年龄,71岁;女性,29.6%;CHA2DS2-VASc评分中位数,3).
    结果:在2年的随访期间,274例患者发生大出血(1.3%/患者-年).在多变量Cox比例风险分析中,高龄,高血压(收缩压≥150mmHg),出血史,贫血,血小板减少症,同时使用的抗血小板药物与大出血的发生率显著相关.我们开发了一个新的风险分层系统,HED-[EPA]2-B3得分,对大出血有更好的预测性能(C-统计0.67,[95%置信区间,0.63-0.70])比HAS-BLED(0.64,[0.60-0.67],P为差异0.02)和ATRIA(0.63,[0.60-0.66],P为差值<0.01)评分。此外,它不显著高于ORBIT(0.65,[0.62-0.68],P代表差异0.07)和DOAC(0.65,[0.62-0.68],P为差异0.17)分数。
    结论:我们新颖的风险分层系统,HED-[EPA]2-B3得分,可能有助于确定接受OAC的日本患者有严重出血的风险.
    OBJECTIVE: Oral anticoagulants (OACs) reduce the risk of ischemic stroke but may increase the risk of major bleeding in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF). Various risk scores, such as HAS-BLED, ATRIA, ORBIT, and DOAC, have been proposed to assess the risk of major bleeding in patients with NVAF receiving OACs. However, limited data are available regarding bleeding risk stratification in Japanese patients with NVAF.
    METHODS: Of the 16,098 NVAF patients from the J-RISK AF study, the combined data of the five major AF registries in Japan (J-RHYTHM Registry, Fushimi AF Registry, Shinken Database, Keio interhospital Cardiovascular Studies, and Hokuriku-Plus AF Registry), we analyzed 11,539 patients receiving OACs (median age, 71 years old; women, 29.6%; median CHA2DS2-VASc score, 3).
    RESULTS: During the 2-year follow-up period, major bleeding occurred in 274 patients (1.3% per patient-year). In a multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis, an advanced age, hypertension (systolic blood pressure ≥ 150 mmHg), bleeding history, anemia, thrombocytopenia, and concomitant antiplatelet agents were significantly associated with a higher incidence of major bleeding. We developed a novel risk stratification system, HED-[EPA]2-B3 score, which had a better predictive performance for major bleeding (C-statistics 0.67, [95% confidence interval, 0.63-0.70]) than the HAS-BLED (0.64, [0.60-0.67], P for difference 0.02) and ATRIA (0.63, [0.60-0.66], P for difference <0.01) scores. Furthermore, it was non-significantly higher than the ORBIT (0.65, [0.62-0.68], P for difference 0.07) and DOAC (0.65, [0.62-0.68], P for difference 0.17) scores.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our novel risk stratification system, the HED-[EPA]2-B3 score, may be useful for identifying Japanese patients receiving OACs at a risk of major bleeding.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:印度糖尿病风险评分(IDRS)是评估个体患2型糖尿病(T2DM)概率的简单工具,但其在社区居住的老年人中的适用性不足。本研究旨在使用IDRS评估未患有糖尿病(DM)的老年人的T2DM风险及其决定因素。同时评估其在有糖尿病史的个体中的敏感性和特异性。
    方法:我们分析了来自印度纵向老龄化研究(LASI)wave-1(2017-18)的横截面数据。IDRS是在年龄≥45岁的个体中计算的,考虑到腰围,身体活动,年龄和DM家族史。风险被归类为高(≥60),中等(30-50),低(<30)。
    结果:在64541人中,7.27%(95%CI:6.78,7.80)处于低风险,61.80%(95%CI:60.99,62.61)处于中等风险,和30.93%(95%CI:30.19,31.67)的T2DM高风险。调整后的分析显示,男性患T2DM的风险更高,丧偶/离婚,城市居民,少数民族宗教,超重,肥胖,和高血压患者。ROC曲线的AUC为0.67(95%CI:0.66,0.67,P<0.001)。IDRS临界值≥50对T2DM检测的敏感性为73.69%,特异性为51.40%。
    结论:当使用IDRS风险预测工具评估时,在印度没有DM病史的10名老年人中,有9名以上具有T2DM的高-中度风险。然而,IDRS在现有DM病例中的低特异性和中等敏感性限制了其作为筛查决策工具的实用性.
    BACKGROUND: The Indian Diabetes Risk Score (IDRS) is a simple tool to assess the probability of an individual having type 2 diabetes (T2DM) but its applicability in community-dwelling older adults is lacking. This study aimed to estimate the risk of T2DM and its determinants among older adults without prior diabetes (DM) using the IDRS, while also assessing its sensitivity and specificity in individuals with a history of diabetes.
    METHODS: We analyzed cross-sectional data from the Longitudinal Ageing Study in India (LASI) wave-1 (2017-18). IDRS was calculated amongst individuals aged ≥45 years considering waist circumference, physical activity, age and family history of DM. Risk was categorized as high (≥60), moderate (30-50), and low (<30).
    RESULTS: Among 64541 individuals, 7.27 % (95 % CI: 6.78, 7.80) were at low risk, 61.80 % (95 % CI: 60.99, 62.61) at moderate risk, and 30.93 % (95 % CI: 30.19, 31.67) at high risk for T2DM. Adjusted analysis showed higher risk of T2DM among men, widowed/divorced, urban residents, minority religions, overweight, obese, and individuals with hypertension. ROC curve yielded an AUC of 0.67 (95 % CI: 0.66, 0.67, P < 0.001). The IDRS cutoff ≥50 had 73.69 % sensitivity and 51.40 % specificity for T2DM detection.
    CONCLUSIONS: More than 9 in 10 older adults in India without history of DM have high-moderate risk of T2DM when assessed with the IDRS risk-prediction tool. However, the low specificity and moderate sensitivity of IDRS in existing DM cases constraints its practical utility as a decision tool for screening.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号