protocols & guidelines

协议和指南
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患者安全文化是提高家庭保健质量和预防在家庭保健中心接受护理的患者发生不良事件的关键因素。然而,家庭医疗中心病人安全文化的概念没有明确界定,其尺寸和特征在很大程度上仍然未知。这项范围界定检讨的目的是全面概述家庭保健中心病人安全文化的研究,确定相关的定义和特征,并专注于关键因素,以填补现有的知识空白。
    方法:本综述将遵循Arksey和O'Malley的方法论框架,由乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)更新,包括五个阶段:确定研究问题,确定相关研究,选择研究,绘制数据,和整理,总结和报告结果。纳入标准将基于人口,概念和上下文框架。全面搜索PubMed,Embase,Scopus,ProQuest,WebofScience,Cochrane和灰色文献来源,没有日期限制,是在合格的研究馆员的协助下进行的,包括所有相关的已发表的研究设计,并确保对该主题的透彻理解。搜索将不断更新,直到研究完成。此外,我们会检讨最终纳入研究的参考清单及其引文,以寻找进一步的相关研究。重复的研究和不是用波斯语或英语写的研究将被排除。根据资格标准选择研究将由两名独立审稿人进行,他们将进行标题/摘要筛选,然后进行全文筛选。数据提取将使用JBI的标准化表格进行。将进行描述性和内容分析,以确定文献综述中的关键概念。
    背景:本研究不需要进行伦理审查。结果将提交给同行评审的期刊发表,并在会议上发表。
    BACKGROUND: Patient safety culture is a critical factor in improving the quality of home healthcare and preventing adverse events in patients receiving care in home health centres. However, the concept of patient safety culture in home healthcare centres is not clearly defined, and its dimensions and characteristics are still largely unknown. The aim of this scoping review is to provide a comprehensive overview of research on patient safety culture in home healthcare centres, identify related definitions and characteristics, and focus on key factors to fill the existing knowledge gaps.
    METHODS: This review will follow Arksey and O\'Malley\'s methodological framework, updated by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), which comprises five stages: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, selecting the studies, charting the data, and collating, summarising and reporting the results. The inclusion criteria will be based on the Population, Concept and Context framework. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, Cochrane and grey literature sources, with no date restrictions, was conducted with the assistance of a qualified research librarian to include all relevant published study designs and ensure a thorough understanding of the topic. The search will be continuously updated until the study is completed. In addition, we will review the reference lists of the final included studies and their citations to find further relevant studies. Studies that are duplicates and those not written in Persian or English will be excluded. The selection of studies based on the eligibility criteria will carried out by two independent reviewers who will perform a title/abstract screening followed by a full-text screening. Data extraction will be conducted using a standardised form from the JBI. Descriptive and content analyses will be conducted to identify key concepts in the literature reviewed.
    BACKGROUND: No ethical review is required for this study. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:医疗保健中的数字决策支持系统是一种数字健康干预措施,可通过提供治疗建议并提高诊断准确性和护理质量来协助医疗保健专业人员进行决策。这将是巴基斯坦评估系统可用性的第一项研究,改善医疗保健结果的可接受性和有效性,同时评估感知的护理质量。这一全面评估将为数字卫生干预措施的扩大等领域的政策制定提供信息,数据隐私和技术互操作性。有效性的措施将包括通过患者退出反馈调查的临床结果的变化。本研究旨在评估数字决策支持系统在医疗保健决策中的作用。这可能会被整合到巴基斯坦的远程初级医疗保健系统中。
    方法:本研究将采用多方法方法。数据收集工具改编自世界卫生组织的数字卫生干预监测和评估框架,包括技术评估,医疗保健提供者调查,患者退出访谈和与医疗保健提供者的焦点小组讨论。目的抽样将用于与提供者(医生)和患者进行定性访谈。政府利益相关者,私营部门,多边、学术界和决策者将通过协商会议参与。我们还将进行文献综述,以及对现有研究的全面分析,与全球实施的数字决策支持系统和数字卫生干预措施相关的文件和数据,并评估性能,挑战和机遇。
    背景:该研究已获得阿加汗大学伦理审查委员会的批准(2023-8514-26533)。通过科学出版物和研讨会传播研究结果将使方案管理人员和决策者能够设计工具,以提高通过远程医疗平台提供的护理质量。这将有助于有效的决策,低收入和中等收入国家初级卫生保健的可得性和护理质量。这项研究还将为初级保健机构扩大决策支持系统的政策提供信息,数据隐私和技术互操作性。
    BACKGROUND: A digital decision support system in healthcare is a digital health intervention that assists healthcare professionals in decision-making by providing treatment recommendations and enhancing diagnostic accuracy and quality of care. This will be the first study in Pakistan to assess the system\'s usability, acceptability and effectiveness in improving healthcare outcomes while also evaluating the perceived quality of care. This comprehensive assessment will inform policy development in areas such as the scale-up of digital health interventions, data privacy and technology interoperability. Measures of effectiveness will include changes in clinical outcomes through a patient exit feedback survey. This study aims to evaluate the role of digital decision support systems in healthcare decision-making, which may be integrated into Pakistan\'s tele-primary healthcare system.
    METHODS: The study will employ a multimethod approach. The data collection tools are adapted from the WHO\'s digital health intervention monitoring and evaluation framework and include a technology assessment, healthcare provider surveys, patient exit interviews and focus group discussions with healthcare providers. Purposive sampling will be used for qualitative interviews with providers (doctors) and patients. Government stakeholders, private sectors, multilateral, academia and policymakers will be engaged through a consultative meeting. We will also conduct a literature review, as well as a comprehensive analysis of existing studies, documents and data relevant to digital decision support systems and digital health interventions implemented globally, and assess the performance, challenges and opportunities.
    BACKGROUND: The study has been approved by the Ethics Review Committee at The Aga Khan University (2023-8514-26533). The dissemination of study findings through scientific publications and seminars will enable programme managers and policymakers to design tools to improve the quality of care provided through telemedicine platforms. This will contribute to efficient decision-making, access and quality of care for primary healthcare in low-income and middle-income countries. This study will also inform policy regarding the scale-up of decision support systems in primary care settings, data privacy and technology interoperability.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:该方案的目的是调查风险因素,高输出肠造口的关键评价内容和预防措施。
    方法:此范围审查将遵循JoannaBriggsInstitute的范围审查指南。PubMed,EMBASE,CINAHL,从2015年1月至2024年1月,将检索中国生物文献数据库和Cochrane图书馆的相关文献。建议的分级,评估,非随机干预研究中的开发和评估以及偏倚风险将用于评估证据的可靠性。
    背景:由于此范围审查涉及数据库搜索以进行文献分析,不需要患者的知情同意和伦理批准.这些发现将为研究人员提供重要的决策信息,临床医生和造口护理人员。审查结果将在科学会议上发表,并在同行评审的期刊上发表。
    BACKGROUND: The purpose of this protocol is to investigate the risk factors, critical evaluation contents and preventive measures of high-output enterostomy.
    METHODS: This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Chinese Biological Literature Database and the Cochrane Library will be searched for relevant literature published from January 2015 to January 2024. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions will be used to assess the reliability of the evidence.
    BACKGROUND: As this scoping review involves database searches for literature analysis, informed consent and ethical approval from patients will not be required. The findings will provide essential decision-making information for researchers, clinicians and ostomy nursing staff. The results of the review will be presented at a scientific conference and published in a peer-reviewed journal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:冠状动脉微循环功能障碍(CMD)在冠状动脉疾病(CAD)患者中普遍存在。目前CMD的治疗集中在药物治疗上,非药物治疗如增强型体外反搏(EECP)在CAD患者中显示出良好的效果.然而,EECP是否能改善CMD尚不清楚。这项研究旨在评估EECP对CAD患者CMD的有效性。并评估进行多中心随机对照试验的可行性。
    方法:本研究是单中心,结果评估者盲化,平行随机对照试验。共有110名CAD参与者将被纳入并随机分配到干预组(EECP加最佳药物治疗(OMT))或对照组(仅OMT)。EECP将由操作员管理60分钟,每周5次,共7周(共35次)。结果包括患者的保留率,主要结果和次要结果。主要结果是心脏MRI从基线到随访结束时心肌灌注储备指数的变化。计划的研究时间为2024年至2026年。
    背景:获得了第八附属医院伦理委员会的伦理批准,中山大学(ID:2023-045-03)。调查结果将在同行评审的出版物中传播。
    背景:ChiCTR2300076231。
    BACKGROUND: Coronary microcirculation dysfunction (CMD) is prevalent in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD). Current therapies for CMD are focused on pharmacotherapy, non-pharmacological treatments such as enhanced external counterpulsation (EECP) have shown favourable results in patients with CAD. However, whether EECP can improve CMD remains unknown. This study is designed to evaluate the effectiveness of EECP on CMD in patients with CAD, and to assess the feasibility of conducting a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    METHODS: This study is a single-centre, outcome-assessor-blinded, parallel randomised controlled trial. A total of 110 participants with CAD will be included and randomly assigned to either the intervention group (EECP plus optimal medical therapy (OMT)) or the control group (OMT alone). EECP will be administered by operators for 60 min, 5 times per week for 7 weeks (35 times in total). Outcomes include patients\' retention rates, the primary outcome and secondary outcomes. The primary outcome is the change in Myocardial Perfusion Reserve Index with cardiac MRI from baseline to the end of follow-up. The planned study duration is from 2024 to 2026.
    BACKGROUND: Ethical approval was obtained from the Ethics Committee of the Eighth Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (ID: 2023-045-03). The findings will be disseminated in peer-reviewed publications.
    BACKGROUND: ChiCTR2300076231.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:儿童龋齿是一个主要的全球健康问题,在沙特阿拉伯是一个特殊的公共卫生挑战。龋齿会引起疼痛,感染和负面影响生活质量。作为沙特阿拉伯人口口腔健康改善工作的一部分,该项目旨在评估幼儿园有监督的刷牙计划的有效性。
    方法:本研究是一项整群随机对照试验。入学始于2022年9月,在利雅得的20所随机选择的幼儿园进行了两个学年(2022-2024年)。数据收集阶段将于2024年9月完成。十所幼稚园被随机分配接受监督刷牙,十所照常接受治疗,这是一年一度的口腔健康意识访问。主要终点将是通过衰变(进入牙本质)测量的明显衰变经历的恶化,从基线到随访第二年的缺失和填充牙齿(d3mft)。次要终点将是受影响的牙齿数量的增加。利雅得地区的先验子群,学校类型(公共,私人),儿童性别和基线时先前衰变的存在/不存在,将被分析。我们需要244个可评估端点,使用80%的幂来满足样本量要求。此外,行为问卷,生活质量,正在部署过程监控和成本分析。
    背景:沙特卫生部法哈德国王医疗城机构审查委员会批准了这项研究(22-083E/2022年3月)。数据分析已获得格拉斯哥大学医学兽医和生命科学研究伦理委员会的批准(200220194/2023年3月)。这项研究的结果将通过在科学会议和科学期刊上的演讲进行传播。
    背景:NCT05512156。
    BACKGROUND: Dental caries among children is a major global health problem and is a particular public health challenge in Saudi Arabia. Dental caries cause pain, infection and negatively impact quality of life. As part of population oral health improvement efforts in Saudi Arabia, this project aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a supervised toothbrushing programme in kindergartens.
    METHODS: This study is a cluster randomised controlled trial. Enrolment began in September 2022, for two academic years (2022-2024) on 20 randomly selected kindergartens in Riyadh. The data collection phase will be completed in September 2024. Ten kindergartens are randomly allocated to supervised toothbrushing and 10 to treatment as usual, which is an annual oral health awareness visit. The primary endpoint will be the worsening of obvious decay experience as measured by decayed (into dentine), missing and filled teeth (d3mft) from baseline to the second year of follow-up. The secondary endpoint will be the increase in the number of teeth affected. A priori subgroups of the region of Riyadh, school type (public, private), child sex and presence/absence of prior decay at baseline, will be analysed. We require 244 evaluable endpoints using a power of 80% to meet the sample size requirement. In addition, questionnaires on behaviours, quality of life, process monitoring and cost analysis are being deployed.
    BACKGROUND: Ethics approval for this study was given by the King Fahad Medical City Institutional Review Board in the Saudi Ministry of Health (22-083E/March 2022). The data analysis has been approved by the University of Glasgow Medical Veterinary and Life Sciences Research Ethical Committee (200220194/March 2023). The results of this study will be disseminated through presentations at scientific conferences and in scientific journals.
    BACKGROUND: NCT05512156.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:预计舞者会在职业生涯中遇到重大挑战,这些挑战可能会对他们的身心健康造成损害。为了解决可能增加舞者心理和身体健康困难的潜在因素,研究表明,系统地使用技术来建立心理技能,以减少风险因素并增强保护因素,以应对舞者遇到的挑战。然而,现有的舞蹈心理技能训练干预措施在设计上缺乏一致性,内容和持续时间,这使得难以提供基于证据的建议。因此,舞蹈研究人员和从业者将受益于混合方法系统综述(MMSR)的原因,这些干预措施的内容和方式。采用干预描述和复制模板(TIDieR)等工具可以通过描述干预的可复制方面来帮助这一努力。从而为舞蹈研究人员提供如何理解的建议,评估和报告舞蹈中的干预特征和过程。因此,该方案概述了MMSR,该MMSR将使用TIDieR来识别和评估舞蹈中心理技能干预的特征.
    方法:将在Psycinfo中进行系统搜索,Medline,Embase,运动铁饼,WebofScience和GoogleScholar的前30页。搜索之后,两名审稿人将独立筛选Covidence中已确定的研究。一位评审员将使用TIDieR框架和混合方法评估工具(MMAT)提取数据进行质量评估,而第二位审查人员将检查提取的研究样本的准确性。将进行融合综合综合,其中通过将定量数据限定为文本描述来整合定量和定性证据。
    背景:由于不会收集任何经验数据,因此对该系统评价没有道德批准的要求。研究结果将通过科学期刊上的同行评审出版物和几个不同论坛上的演讲进行传播(例如,舞蹈心理学网络,在科学和应用会议上)。
    CRD42024537249。
    BACKGROUND: Dancers are expected to navigate major challenges in their careers that might take a toll on their physical and mental health. To address underlying factors that might increase dancers\' mental and physical health difficulties, research suggests the systematic use of techniques to build mental skills that can reduce risk factors and enhance protective factors against the challenges dancers encounter. However, existing mental skills training interventions in dance present a lack of consistency in design, content and duration, making it difficult to provide evidence-based recommendations. Hence, dance researchers and practitioners would benefit from a mixed methods systematic review (MMSR) of the why, what and how of these interventions. Adopting tools such as the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) can aid this endeavour by describing replicable aspects of interventions, thus offering dance researchers suggestions on how to understand, appraise and report intervention characteristics and processes in dance. Therefore, this protocol outlines a MMSR that will employ TIDieR to identify and assess characteristics of mental skills interventions in dance.
    METHODS: A systematic search will be undertaken in Psycinfo, Medline, Embase, Sportdiscus, Web of Science and the first 30 pages of GoogleScholar. Following the search, two reviewers will independently screen identified studies in Covidence. One reviewer will extract data using the TIDieR framework and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for quality appraisal, while a second reviewer will check a sample of extracted studies for accuracy. A convergent integrated synthesis will be conducted where quantitative and qualitative evidence will be integrated by qualitising the quantitative data into textual descriptions.
    BACKGROUND: There is no requirement for ethical approval for this systematic review as no empirical data will be collected. The findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication in a scientific journal and presentations in several different forums (eg, a dance psychology network, at scientific and applied conferences).
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42024537249.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在营养科学领域显示意见分歧的主题之一是临床实践指南(CPGs)对精氨酸免疫调节饮食的建议,核苷酸和omega-3用于诊断患有癌症的个体接受大手术。建议的质量直接关系到可信度,他们发展的透明度和严谨性,以及已发表和可纳入建议的研究的质量,如系统评价(SRs)和随机临床试验。这项研究的目的是评估胃肠道和头颈部癌症患者围手术期免疫调节补充建议的方法学质量,CPGs,以及支持这些建议的研究。
    方法:我们将对CPG进行系统的搜索。将使用“评估指南研究和评估-推荐卓越”工具分析接受大型肿瘤手术的个体的免疫调节底物营养补充建议。将使用评估准则研究和评估II工具对CPG进行分析。建议中引用的SR将使用评估系统审查的衡量工具II工具和有关审查异质性的其他问题进行分析。SRs和指南建议(适用时)中引用的临床试验将根据有关试验异质性的问题进行分析。结果将使用描述性分析在表格或图表中呈现。
    背景:这项研究的结果将通过相关会议和同行评审的期刊进行传播。
    10.17605/OSF。IO/X2GYT。
    BACKGROUND: One of the topics that show differences of opinion in the scientific field of nutrition is the recommendation by clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) of an immunomodulatory diet with arginine, nucleotides and omega-3 for individuals diagnosed with cancer undergoing major surgery. The quality of the recommendations is directly related to credibility, transparency and rigour in their development, but also to the quality of the studies published and available for inclusion in the recommendation, such as systematic reviews (SRs) and randomised clinical trials. The aim of this study is to evaluate the methodological quality of the recommendation of perioperative immunomodulatory supplementation for individuals with gastrointestinal and head and neck cancer, the CPGs, and the studies that support the recommendations.
    METHODS: We will conduct a systematic search for CPGs. Recommendations for nutritional supplementation with immunomodulatory substrates for individuals undergoing major oncological surgery will be analysed using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation-Recommendations Excellence tool. CPGs will be analysed using the Appraisal of Guidelines Research and Evaluation II tool. The SRs cited in the recommendations will be analysed using the A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews II tool and additional questions regarding heterogeneity in reviews. The clinical trials cited in the SRs and in the guideline recommendations (when applicable) will be analysed according to questions regarding heterogeneity in trials. The results will be presented in tables or charts using descriptive analyses.
    BACKGROUND: The results of this study will be disseminated through relevant conferences and peer-reviewed journals.
    UNASSIGNED: 10.17605/OSF.IO/X2GYT.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:母乳喂养对妇女及其新生儿都有许多健康益处。建议纯母乳喂养至少6个月,以优化婴儿生长。发展与健康。除了标准护理,建议以社区为基础的同伴支持帮助母亲改善母乳喂养.最近一项调查显示,本港产后6个月的纯母乳喂养率较低,一半母乳喂养的母亲从不纯母乳喂养。考虑到当地妇女在产后第一个月呆在家里的做法,以及在COVID-19大流行期间和之后的社会隔离,提出了在Zoom或Facetime的帮助下基于家庭的对等支持计划。这项研究旨在评估以家庭为基础的母乳喂养同伴支持计划在改善母乳喂养实践和实现母乳喂养自我效能低的妇女的纯母乳喂养率方面的有效性。
    方法:该研究是一项双臂随机对照试验,将包括442名参与者。潜在病例将在香港公立医院的四个产后病房进行招募和筛查。符合条件和同意的病例将以1:1的比例随机分配到干预组或对照组。对照组(n=221)将接受标准护理,而干预组(n=221)将接受基于家庭的同伴支持以及标准护理。训练有素的同伴顾问将在产后10天和1个月通过Zoom或Facetime提供与母乳喂养相关的支持。电话随访将在1个月进行,2个月,产后3个月和6个月。母乳喂养状态,母亲的母乳喂养自我效能和产后抑郁症将被评估和比较这两个武器。
    背景:该研究已获得香港大学机构审查委员会和医院管理局香港西部集群(UW20-564)的审查和批准。研究结果将在试验注册中心更新,并在同行评审的期刊和学术会议上传播。
    背景:NCT04621266。
    BACKGROUND: Breastfeeding is associated with many health benefits for both women and their newborns. Exclusive breastfeeding has been recommended for at least 6 months to optimise infant growth, development and health. In addition to standard care, community-based peer support is recommended to help mothers improve breastfeeding. A recent survey reveals that the rate of exclusive breastfeeding at 6 months post partum in Hong Kong is low, and half of all breastfeeding mothers never exclusively breastfeed. Taking into account the local practice for women to stay home during the first month post partum and social isolation during and post-COVID-19 pandemic, a home-based peer support programme with the aid of Zoom or Facetime is proposed. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of a home-based breastfeeding peer support programme in improving breastfeeding practices and achieving exclusive breastfeeding rate among women with low breastfeeding self-efficacy.
    METHODS: The study is a two-armed randomised control trial and will include a total of 442 participants. Potential cases will be recruited and screened at four postnatal wards in Hong Kong public hospital. Eligible and consented cases will be randomly allocated into intervention or control groups at a 1:1 ratio. Control group (n=221) will receive standard care, while the intervention group (n=221) will receive home-based peer support as well as standard care. Trained peer counsellors will provide breastfeeding-related support through Zoom or Facetime at 10 days and 1 month post partum. Telephone follow-ups will be conducted at 1 month, 2 months, 3 months and 6 months post partum. Breastfeeding status, mother\'s breastfeeding self-efficacy and postpartum depression will be assessed and compared between the two arms.
    BACKGROUND: The study has been reviewed and approved by the Institutional Review Board of the University of Hong Kong and Hospital Authority Hong Kong West Cluster (UW 20-564). The findings will be updated in trial registries and disseminated in peer-reviewed journals and academic conferences.
    BACKGROUND: NCT04621266.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在过去5年中,澳大利亚使用大麻药物(CBM)作为治疗药物的数量激增。历史上,《联合国麻醉品单一公约》(1961年)禁止在欧洲使用大麻,美国,英国和澳大利亚,导致立法阻力和有限的CBM临床前数据。现有的CBM安全监控系统结构不佳,无法很好地集成到繁忙的卫生专业人员的工作流程中。因此,上市后的监督是不一致的。这篇综述旨在评估监测CBM副作用和不良事件的国际系统。
    方法:要用系统的方法进行范围审查,我们利用人口,干预,比较,开发关键字元素的结果(PICO)框架,和两个搜索查询,以最大限度地提高搜索灵敏度和特异性。
    方法:将搜索查询输入Embase和Scopus以获取同行评审的文献,2023年6月23日进行了更多的灰色文献搜索。
    方法:我们在评论中包含了54篇全文文章:39篇来自同行评审的搜索,8来自灰色文献,7来自相关文本的引用。
    方法:我们的搜索产生了两种主要形式的监测系统:数据库和登记册。在确定的24个监测系统中,有10个数据库和14个登记册,通常由监管机构创建的数据库。系统在因果关系评估方法上有所不同,收集的细节水平,术语和从属关系。
    结果:在具有足够的已发布数据进行分析的监测系统中,在这次审查时,除了一个人之外,所有人都保持活跃。Vigibase是最大的集中式监控系统,接收国际病例报告,然而,数据异质性仍然存在。
    结论:我们的研究强调了集中化,一致和可访问的系统,用于药物大麻使用相关的副作用和不良事件的上市后监测。
    OBJECTIVE: The use of cannabis-based medicine (CBM) as a therapeutic has surged in Australia over the past 5 years. Historically, the United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (1961) prohibited cannabis use in Europe, the USA, the UK and Australia, leading to legislative resistance and limited preclinical data on CBM. Existing safety monitoring systems for CBM are poorly structured and do not integrate well into the workflows of busy health professionals. As a result, postmarketing surveillance is inconsistent. This review aims to evaluate international systems for monitoring CBM side effects and adverse events.
    METHODS: To undertake a scoping review with a systematic approach, we used the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) framework to develop keyword elements, and two search queries to maximise search sensitivity and specificity.
    METHODS: Search queries were entered into Embase and Scopus for peer-reviewed literature, and additional searches for grey literature were conducted on 23 June 2023.
    METHODS: We included 54 full-text articles in the review: 39 from peer-reviewed searches, 8 from grey literature and 7 from citations of relevant texts.
    METHODS: Our search yielded two main forms of monitoring systems: databases and registries. Out of the 24 monitoring systems identified, there were 10 databases and 14 registries, with databases often created by regulatory authorities. Systems differed in methods of causality assessment, level of detail collected, terminology and affiliations.
    RESULTS: Within the monitoring systems with enough published data for analysis, all except one remain active at the time of this review. VigiBase is the largest centralised monitoring system, receiving international case reports, however data heterogeneity persists.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study emphasises the need for a centralised, consistent and accessible system for the postmarketing surveillance of side effects and adverse events associated with medicinal cannabis use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:数字教科书(DTs),学生阅读几十个段落片段,并通过新问题系统化他们的知识水平,可以成为数字原住民考虑的替代方案。在本科护理学校教授数字原住民时,需要开发DTs。需要进行范围审查,以了解DTs在护理教育中的现状。
    方法:已经进行了初步搜索,以检查PubMed(NCBI)产生的结果是否在10年内以英文发表,并且与DTs相关。本研究包括针对护理本科生的研究。将使用Embase(Elsevier)进一步搜索文献,Cochrane图书馆和护理和相关健康累积指数(CINAHL)数据库。这项范围审查还将考虑定量,定性,和混合的研究方法,文本和意见文件;审查研究;和试点测试。选择的研究将首先根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的范围审查审查数据提取部分进行提取,以确定其一般特征。将根据电子教科书框架:信息产品,技术和利益相关者。
    背景:南布大学机构审查委员会,韩国,批准本研究审查豁免(批准号:1041478-2022-HR-009)。这项研究的结果将通过研究成果传播给护理教育机构和医院。开放式科学框架:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF。IO/QS6WH。
    BACKGROUND: Digital textbooks (DTs), in which students read dozens of paragraph clips and systematise their level of knowledge through new questions, can be an alternative for digital natives to consider. Developing DTs is required when teaching digital natives at undergraduate nursing schools. A scoping review is required to understand the current status of DTs in nursing education.
    METHODS: The preliminary search has been conducted to check whether the results produced by PubMed (NCBI) were published in English within 10 years and related to DTs. This study includes research targeting undergraduate nursing students. Literature will be further searched using Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Library and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL) databases. This scoping review will also consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods, texts and opinion documents; review studies; and pilot tests. The chosen studies will first be extracted based on the scoping review data extraction section of Joanna Briggs Institute to identify their general characteristics. DTs will be analysed based on the e-textbook framework: information goods, technology and stakeholders.
    BACKGROUND: The Institutional Review Board of Nambu University, South Korea, approved this study for review exemption (approval number: 1041478-2022-HR-009). The results of this study will be disseminated through research results to nursing education institutions and hospitals. OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QS6WH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号