protocols & guidelines

协议和指南
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患者安全文化是提高家庭保健质量和预防在家庭保健中心接受护理的患者发生不良事件的关键因素。然而,家庭医疗中心病人安全文化的概念没有明确界定,其尺寸和特征在很大程度上仍然未知。这项范围界定检讨的目的是全面概述家庭保健中心病人安全文化的研究,确定相关的定义和特征,并专注于关键因素,以填补现有的知识空白。
    方法:本综述将遵循Arksey和O'Malley的方法论框架,由乔安娜·布里格斯研究所(JBI)更新,包括五个阶段:确定研究问题,确定相关研究,选择研究,绘制数据,和整理,总结和报告结果。纳入标准将基于人口,概念和上下文框架。全面搜索PubMed,Embase,Scopus,ProQuest,WebofScience,Cochrane和灰色文献来源,没有日期限制,是在合格的研究馆员的协助下进行的,包括所有相关的已发表的研究设计,并确保对该主题的透彻理解。搜索将不断更新,直到研究完成。此外,我们会检讨最终纳入研究的参考清单及其引文,以寻找进一步的相关研究。重复的研究和不是用波斯语或英语写的研究将被排除。根据资格标准选择研究将由两名独立审稿人进行,他们将进行标题/摘要筛选,然后进行全文筛选。数据提取将使用JBI的标准化表格进行。将进行描述性和内容分析,以确定文献综述中的关键概念。
    背景:本研究不需要进行伦理审查。结果将提交给同行评审的期刊发表,并在会议上发表。
    BACKGROUND: Patient safety culture is a critical factor in improving the quality of home healthcare and preventing adverse events in patients receiving care in home health centres. However, the concept of patient safety culture in home healthcare centres is not clearly defined, and its dimensions and characteristics are still largely unknown. The aim of this scoping review is to provide a comprehensive overview of research on patient safety culture in home healthcare centres, identify related definitions and characteristics, and focus on key factors to fill the existing knowledge gaps.
    METHODS: This review will follow Arksey and O\'Malley\'s methodological framework, updated by the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI), which comprises five stages: identifying the research question, identifying relevant studies, selecting the studies, charting the data, and collating, summarising and reporting the results. The inclusion criteria will be based on the Population, Concept and Context framework. A comprehensive search of PubMed, Embase, Scopus, ProQuest, Web of Science, Cochrane and grey literature sources, with no date restrictions, was conducted with the assistance of a qualified research librarian to include all relevant published study designs and ensure a thorough understanding of the topic. The search will be continuously updated until the study is completed. In addition, we will review the reference lists of the final included studies and their citations to find further relevant studies. Studies that are duplicates and those not written in Persian or English will be excluded. The selection of studies based on the eligibility criteria will carried out by two independent reviewers who will perform a title/abstract screening followed by a full-text screening. Data extraction will be conducted using a standardised form from the JBI. Descriptive and content analyses will be conducted to identify key concepts in the literature reviewed.
    BACKGROUND: No ethical review is required for this study. Results will be submitted for publication in a peer-reviewed journal and presented at conferences.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:该方案的目的是调查风险因素,高输出肠造口的关键评价内容和预防措施。
    方法:此范围审查将遵循JoannaBriggsInstitute的范围审查指南。PubMed,EMBASE,CINAHL,从2015年1月至2024年1月,将检索中国生物文献数据库和Cochrane图书馆的相关文献。建议的分级,评估,非随机干预研究中的开发和评估以及偏倚风险将用于评估证据的可靠性。
    背景:由于此范围审查涉及数据库搜索以进行文献分析,不需要患者的知情同意和伦理批准.这些发现将为研究人员提供重要的决策信息,临床医生和造口护理人员。审查结果将在科学会议上发表,并在同行评审的期刊上发表。
    BACKGROUND: The purpose of this protocol is to investigate the risk factors, critical evaluation contents and preventive measures of high-output enterostomy.
    METHODS: This scoping review will follow the Joanna Briggs Institute guidelines for scoping reviews. PubMed, EMBASE, CINAHL, the Chinese Biological Literature Database and the Cochrane Library will be searched for relevant literature published from January 2015 to January 2024. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation and the Risk Of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions will be used to assess the reliability of the evidence.
    BACKGROUND: As this scoping review involves database searches for literature analysis, informed consent and ethical approval from patients will not be required. The findings will provide essential decision-making information for researchers, clinicians and ostomy nursing staff. The results of the review will be presented at a scientific conference and published in a peer-reviewed journal.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:预计舞者会在职业生涯中遇到重大挑战,这些挑战可能会对他们的身心健康造成损害。为了解决可能增加舞者心理和身体健康困难的潜在因素,研究表明,系统地使用技术来建立心理技能,以减少风险因素并增强保护因素,以应对舞者遇到的挑战。然而,现有的舞蹈心理技能训练干预措施在设计上缺乏一致性,内容和持续时间,这使得难以提供基于证据的建议。因此,舞蹈研究人员和从业者将受益于混合方法系统综述(MMSR)的原因,这些干预措施的内容和方式。采用干预描述和复制模板(TIDieR)等工具可以通过描述干预的可复制方面来帮助这一努力。从而为舞蹈研究人员提供如何理解的建议,评估和报告舞蹈中的干预特征和过程。因此,该方案概述了MMSR,该MMSR将使用TIDieR来识别和评估舞蹈中心理技能干预的特征.
    方法:将在Psycinfo中进行系统搜索,Medline,Embase,运动铁饼,WebofScience和GoogleScholar的前30页。搜索之后,两名审稿人将独立筛选Covidence中已确定的研究。一位评审员将使用TIDieR框架和混合方法评估工具(MMAT)提取数据进行质量评估,而第二位审查人员将检查提取的研究样本的准确性。将进行融合综合综合,其中通过将定量数据限定为文本描述来整合定量和定性证据。
    背景:由于不会收集任何经验数据,因此对该系统评价没有道德批准的要求。研究结果将通过科学期刊上的同行评审出版物和几个不同论坛上的演讲进行传播(例如,舞蹈心理学网络,在科学和应用会议上)。
    CRD42024537249。
    BACKGROUND: Dancers are expected to navigate major challenges in their careers that might take a toll on their physical and mental health. To address underlying factors that might increase dancers\' mental and physical health difficulties, research suggests the systematic use of techniques to build mental skills that can reduce risk factors and enhance protective factors against the challenges dancers encounter. However, existing mental skills training interventions in dance present a lack of consistency in design, content and duration, making it difficult to provide evidence-based recommendations. Hence, dance researchers and practitioners would benefit from a mixed methods systematic review (MMSR) of the why, what and how of these interventions. Adopting tools such as the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) can aid this endeavour by describing replicable aspects of interventions, thus offering dance researchers suggestions on how to understand, appraise and report intervention characteristics and processes in dance. Therefore, this protocol outlines a MMSR that will employ TIDieR to identify and assess characteristics of mental skills interventions in dance.
    METHODS: A systematic search will be undertaken in Psycinfo, Medline, Embase, Sportdiscus, Web of Science and the first 30 pages of GoogleScholar. Following the search, two reviewers will independently screen identified studies in Covidence. One reviewer will extract data using the TIDieR framework and the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for quality appraisal, while a second reviewer will check a sample of extracted studies for accuracy. A convergent integrated synthesis will be conducted where quantitative and qualitative evidence will be integrated by qualitising the quantitative data into textual descriptions.
    BACKGROUND: There is no requirement for ethical approval for this systematic review as no empirical data will be collected. The findings will be disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication in a scientific journal and presentations in several different forums (eg, a dance psychology network, at scientific and applied conferences).
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42024537249.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:在过去5年中,澳大利亚使用大麻药物(CBM)作为治疗药物的数量激增。历史上,《联合国麻醉品单一公约》(1961年)禁止在欧洲使用大麻,美国,英国和澳大利亚,导致立法阻力和有限的CBM临床前数据。现有的CBM安全监控系统结构不佳,无法很好地集成到繁忙的卫生专业人员的工作流程中。因此,上市后的监督是不一致的。这篇综述旨在评估监测CBM副作用和不良事件的国际系统。
    方法:要用系统的方法进行范围审查,我们利用人口,干预,比较,开发关键字元素的结果(PICO)框架,和两个搜索查询,以最大限度地提高搜索灵敏度和特异性。
    方法:将搜索查询输入Embase和Scopus以获取同行评审的文献,2023年6月23日进行了更多的灰色文献搜索。
    方法:我们在评论中包含了54篇全文文章:39篇来自同行评审的搜索,8来自灰色文献,7来自相关文本的引用。
    方法:我们的搜索产生了两种主要形式的监测系统:数据库和登记册。在确定的24个监测系统中,有10个数据库和14个登记册,通常由监管机构创建的数据库。系统在因果关系评估方法上有所不同,收集的细节水平,术语和从属关系。
    结果:在具有足够的已发布数据进行分析的监测系统中,在这次审查时,除了一个人之外,所有人都保持活跃。Vigibase是最大的集中式监控系统,接收国际病例报告,然而,数据异质性仍然存在。
    结论:我们的研究强调了集中化,一致和可访问的系统,用于药物大麻使用相关的副作用和不良事件的上市后监测。
    OBJECTIVE: The use of cannabis-based medicine (CBM) as a therapeutic has surged in Australia over the past 5 years. Historically, the United Nations Single Convention on Narcotic Drugs (1961) prohibited cannabis use in Europe, the USA, the UK and Australia, leading to legislative resistance and limited preclinical data on CBM. Existing safety monitoring systems for CBM are poorly structured and do not integrate well into the workflows of busy health professionals. As a result, postmarketing surveillance is inconsistent. This review aims to evaluate international systems for monitoring CBM side effects and adverse events.
    METHODS: To undertake a scoping review with a systematic approach, we used the Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcome (PICO) framework to develop keyword elements, and two search queries to maximise search sensitivity and specificity.
    METHODS: Search queries were entered into Embase and Scopus for peer-reviewed literature, and additional searches for grey literature were conducted on 23 June 2023.
    METHODS: We included 54 full-text articles in the review: 39 from peer-reviewed searches, 8 from grey literature and 7 from citations of relevant texts.
    METHODS: Our search yielded two main forms of monitoring systems: databases and registries. Out of the 24 monitoring systems identified, there were 10 databases and 14 registries, with databases often created by regulatory authorities. Systems differed in methods of causality assessment, level of detail collected, terminology and affiliations.
    RESULTS: Within the monitoring systems with enough published data for analysis, all except one remain active at the time of this review. VigiBase is the largest centralised monitoring system, receiving international case reports, however data heterogeneity persists.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study emphasises the need for a centralised, consistent and accessible system for the postmarketing surveillance of side effects and adverse events associated with medicinal cannabis use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:数字教科书(DTs),学生阅读几十个段落片段,并通过新问题系统化他们的知识水平,可以成为数字原住民考虑的替代方案。在本科护理学校教授数字原住民时,需要开发DTs。需要进行范围审查,以了解DTs在护理教育中的现状。
    方法:已经进行了初步搜索,以检查PubMed(NCBI)产生的结果是否在10年内以英文发表,并且与DTs相关。本研究包括针对护理本科生的研究。将使用Embase(Elsevier)进一步搜索文献,Cochrane图书馆和护理和相关健康累积指数(CINAHL)数据库。这项范围审查还将考虑定量,定性,和混合的研究方法,文本和意见文件;审查研究;和试点测试。选择的研究将首先根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的范围审查审查数据提取部分进行提取,以确定其一般特征。将根据电子教科书框架:信息产品,技术和利益相关者。
    背景:南布大学机构审查委员会,韩国,批准本研究审查豁免(批准号:1041478-2022-HR-009)。这项研究的结果将通过研究成果传播给护理教育机构和医院。开放式科学框架:https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF。IO/QS6WH。
    BACKGROUND: Digital textbooks (DTs), in which students read dozens of paragraph clips and systematise their level of knowledge through new questions, can be an alternative for digital natives to consider. Developing DTs is required when teaching digital natives at undergraduate nursing schools. A scoping review is required to understand the current status of DTs in nursing education.
    METHODS: The preliminary search has been conducted to check whether the results produced by PubMed (NCBI) were published in English within 10 years and related to DTs. This study includes research targeting undergraduate nursing students. Literature will be further searched using Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Library and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL) databases. This scoping review will also consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods, texts and opinion documents; review studies; and pilot tests. The chosen studies will first be extracted based on the scoping review data extraction section of Joanna Briggs Institute to identify their general characteristics. DTs will be analysed based on the e-textbook framework: information goods, technology and stakeholders.
    BACKGROUND: The Institutional Review Board of Nambu University, South Korea, approved this study for review exemption (approval number: 1041478-2022-HR-009). The results of this study will be disseminated through research results to nursing education institutions and hospitals. OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QS6WH.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:利什曼尼酶是被忽视的热带病之一,每年引起大量发病率和死亡率。目前,东非地区是世界上内脏利什曼病负担最高的地区。埃塞俄比亚是报告该疾病的内脏和皮肤形式的东非国家之一。作为《内罗毕宣言》的一部分,埃塞俄比亚承诺到2030年消除内脏利什曼病。在这一努力中,重要的是要了解该国对利什曼虫进行的研究范围,并确定存在研究空白的地方。确定研究环境在控制和消除利什曼虫的计划中至关重要。这将有助于参考进行的研究,确定是否有必要进行系统评价,并帮助确定未来的研究方向。
    方法:本方案是参考JBI范围审查方法学组关于开展范围审查的指南和范围审查的PRISMA-ScR报告指南制定的。将搜索以下数据库:PubMed,Embase通过Embase.com,WebofScience核心合集,科克伦中部,全球指数Medicus,ClinicalTrials.gov,泛非临床试验注册和PROSPERO。可能未在上述系统中索引的本地出版文献将通过熟悉设置的团队成员进行识别。每个记录将使用包含排除标准在摘要标题屏幕和全文屏幕中进行双重和盲目审查。纳入的文章必须包含对埃塞俄比亚利什曼病的深入讨论。提取的数据将包括研究主题,研究类型,以及在开发的码本中定义的类别和子类别,除了利什曼原虫的类型,出版年份,资金来源和引用次数。结果将通过汇总统计来报告。
    背景:个人同意和道德批准不适用。我们计划将我们的研究结果传播给适当的利益相关者。
    BACKGROUND: The leishmaniases are among the group of neglected tropical diseases that cause significant morbidity and mortality each year. Currently, the East Africa region has the highest visceral leishmaniasis burden in the world. Ethiopia is one of the East African countries that reports both visceral and cutaneous forms of the disease. As part of the Nairobi Declaration, Ethiopia showed commitment to the elimination of visceral leishmaniasis by 2030. In this endeavour, it is important to understand the scope of research conducted on leishmaniases in the country and identify where the research gaps exist. Determining the research landscape is vital in the plan towards leishmaniases control and elimination. It will help to reference conducted research, determine if systematic reviews are warranted and help prioritise future research directions.
    METHODS: This protocol was developed with reference to the JBI Scoping Review Methodology Group\'s guidance on conducting scoping reviews and the PRISMA-ScR reporting guidelines for scoping reviews. The following databases will be searched: PubMed, Embase via Embase.com, Web of Science Core Collection, Cochrane CENTRAL, Global Index Medicus, ClinicalTrials.gov, the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry and PROSPERO. Locally published literature that may not be indexed in the above-mentioned systems will be identified through team members familiar with the setting. Each record will be dually and blindly reviewed in an abstract-title screen and full-text screen using inclusion-exclusion criteria. Included articles must contain an in-depth discussion of leishmaniasis in Ethiopia. Data extracted will consist of study themes, study types, and categories and subcategories each defined in the developed codebook, in addition to type of leishmania, year of publication, funding source and the number of citations. Results will be reported with summary statistics.
    BACKGROUND: Individual consenting and ethical approvals are not applicable. We plan to disseminate our findings to the appropriate stakeholders.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:全球产后抑郁症(PPD)的估计患病率,在中国,上海是17.2%,18.0%和23.2%,分别。2021年,上海容纳了320万育龄妇女,由于经济原因,他们中的大多数人与丈夫一起移居城市。由于人们认为存在社会污名化的风险,中国的精神障碍普遍缺乏寻求帮助的行为。在上海,70%的妇女没有为围产期心理健康问题寻求专业帮助。我们的目标是从多个角度收集信息,例如患有PPD和围产期抑郁症(PND)的移民妇女,他们的照顾者,卫生服务提供者和社区,了解中国产后流动妇女PPD或PND的求助行为。
    方法:系统审查的首选报告项目和范围审查的荟萃分析框架将指导本次审查。一位双语研究图书馆员制定了一项全面的搜索策略,以检索已发表和未发表的中英文研究,这些研究涉及影响中国女性PPD或PND寻求帮助行为的因素。这些文献包括感知,视图,模式,接受和拒绝,倾向,概率,服务可访问性和利用率,和事实。我们将搜索PubMed,Embase,科学网和CINAHL为英国文学和CINKI为中国文学。后向和前向雪球方法将用于从选定论文的参考列表中识别其他相关论文。两名独立的审稿人将筛选标题和摘要,并审查所选论文的全文,以确定符合条件的文章进行数据提取。我们将建立一个MicrosoftAccess数据库来记录提取的数据。结果将在表格和因果图中显示,以证明提取的变量与PPD和PND的求助行为之间的关系。将根据文献中的信息制定概念模拟模型,以验证变量之间关系的逻辑,确定知识差距,并深入了解潜在的干预方法。将邀请专家和利益相关者在上海的小组模型构建(GMB)研讨会上对结果进行评论和评论。这些评论对于验证调查结果至关重要,接收反馈并获得更多见解。
    背景:我们研究的文献综述部分不需要伦理批准,因为收集的信息和数据将从公开可用的来源获得,并且不会涉及人类受试者。我们的合作研究伙伴,国际桃子妇幼医院,获得IRB批准(GKLW-A-2023-020-01),用于筛选和招募GMB研讨会的参与者。斯坦福大学根据第67419号方案获得IRB批准。完整的审查将在相关会议上提交,并提交给同行评审的科学期刊发表,以报告发现。
    BACKGROUND: The estimated prevalence of postpartum depression (PPD) worldwide, in China, and Shanghai is 17.2%, 18.0% and 23.2%, respectively. In 2021, Shanghai housed a population of 3.2 million childbearing-age migrant women, most of whom migrated to the city with their husbands for economic reasons. There is a general lack of help-seeking behaviour for mental disorders in China due to the perceived risk of social stigmatisation. In Shanghai, 70% of women did not seek professional help for perinatal mental health problems. We aim to gather information from multiple perspectives, such as the migrant women with PPD and perinatal depression (PND), their caregivers, health service providers and communities, to understand the help-seeking behaviour of postpartum migrant women with PPD or PND in China.
    METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses framework for Scoping Reviews will guide this review. A bilingual research librarian developed a comprehensive search strategy to retrieve published and unpublished English and Chinese studies involving factors influencing women\'s PPD or PND help-seeking behaviour in China. This literature includes perceptions, views, patterns, acceptance and refusal, tendencies, probability, service accessibility and utilisation, and facts. We will search PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and CINAHL for English literature and CINKI for Chinese literature. Backward and forward snowball approaches will be used to identify additional relevant papers from the reference lists of selected papers. Two independent reviewers will screen the title and abstract and review the full text of selected papers to identify eligible articles for data extraction. We will build a Microsoft Access database to record the extracted data. The results will be presented in tables and a causal map to demonstrate the relationships between extracted variables and help-seeking behaviours for PPD and PND. A conceptual simulation model will be formulated based on the information from the literature to validate the logic of the relationships between variables, identify knowledge gaps and gain insights into potential intervention approaches. Experts and stakeholders will be invited to critique and comment on the results during group model building (GMB) workshops in Shanghai. These comments will be essential to validate the findings, receive feedback and obtain additional insights.
    BACKGROUND: The literature review component of our study does not require ethical approval because the information and data collected will be obtained from publicly available sources and will not involve human subjects. Our collaborating research partner, International Peach Maternal Child Hospital, obtained the IRB approval (GKLW-A-2023-020-01) for screening and enrolling participants in GMB workshops. Stanford University received IRB approval under protocol number 67 419. The full review will be presented at a relevant conference and submitted to a peer-reviewed scientific journal for publication to report findings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:评估对间充质基质细胞(MSCs)治疗肌肉骨骼疾病的介入试验登记和报告结果的法定要求的遵守情况,并描述试验的临床和设计特点。
    方法:对已发表的试验和提交给公共登记处的试验的系统评价。
    方法:数据库Medline,科克伦图书馆和麦克马斯特;六个公共临床登记处。所有搜索都进行到2023年1月31日。
    方法:提交给注册管理机构并在2021年1月之前完成的试验。发表在同行评审期刊上的前瞻性介入试验。
    方法:第一作者搜索了那些(1)在公共注册表中发布了试验结果的试验,(2)在同行评审的出版物中介绍了结果,以及(3)在发布前向注册表提交了审前协议。其他提取的变量包括试验设计,参与人数,资金来源,随访持续时间和细胞类型。
    结果:在登记处和文献数据库中发现了总共124项试验。膝关节骨性关节炎是最常见的适应症。在100项注册试验中,52项试验,共有2993名参与者既没有在注册登记中公布结果,也没有公布结果。52项注册试验回顾性地提交了协议。在已发表的67项试验中,有43项(64%)注册了审前方案。资金来源与遵守报告要求无关。在25项试验中的16项发现了注册和出版物中主要终点之间的差异。在28%的试验中,治疗组采用辅助治疗.只有39%的对照试验是双盲的。
    结论:很大一部分试验不符合注册和报告结果的法定要求,从而增加了结果评估中偏差的风险。为了提高对MSCs在肌肉骨骼疾病中的作用的信心,注册管理机构和医学期刊应更严格地执行现有的注册和报告要求。
    OBJECTIVE: To assess compliance with statutory requirements to register and report outcomes in interventional trials of mesenchymal stromal cells (MSCs) for musculoskeletal disorders and to describe the trials\' clinical and design characteristics.
    METHODS: A systematic review of published trials and trials submitted to public registries.
    METHODS: The databases Medline, Cochrane Library and McMaster; six public clinical registries. All searches were done until 31 January 2023.
    METHODS: Trials submitted to registries and completed before January 2021. Prospective interventional trials published in peer-reviewed journals.
    METHODS: The first author searched for trials that had (1) posted trial results in a public registry, (2) presented results in a peer-reviewed publication and (3) submitted a pretrial protocol to a registry before publication. Other extracted variables included trial design, number of participants, funding source, follow-up duration and cell type.
    RESULTS: In total 124 trials were found in registries and literature databases. Knee osteoarthritis was the most common indication. Of the 100 registry trials, 52 trials with in total 2 993 participants had neither posted results in the registry nor published results. Fifty-two of the registry trials submitted a protocol retrospectively. Forty-three of the 67 published trials (64%) had registered a pretrial protocol. Funding source was not associated with compliance with reporting requirements. A discrepancy between primary endpoints in the registry and publication was found in 16 of 25 trials. In 28% of trials, the treatment groups used adjuvant therapies. Only 39% of controlled trials were double-blinded.
    CONCLUSIONS: A large proportion of trials failed to comply with statutory requirements for the registration and reporting of results, thereby increasing the risk of bias in outcome assessments. To improve confidence in the role of MSCs for musculoskeletal disorders, registries and medical journals should more rigorously enforce existing requirements for registration and reporting.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:社交网络可以影响健康信念,通过各种机制的行为和结果,包括社会支持,社会影响和信息扩散。社会网络分析(SNA)一种从社会理论中的关系角度出现的方法,越来越多地用于健康研究。本文概述了使用社会网络分析工具对文献进行范围审查的协议,以检查社会联系对个人非传染性疾病和健康结果的影响。
    方法:此范围审查将由Arksey和O\'Malley的框架指导进行范围审查。搜索电子数据库,OvidMedline,PsycINFO,EMBASE和CINAHL,将于2024年4月使用与SNA相关的术语进行。两名审稿人将独立评估标题和摘要,那么全文,确定的研究,以确定它们是否符合纳入标准。使用SNA作为工具来检查社交网络对个人身体健康的影响的研究,心理健康,幸福,健康行为,医疗保健利用,或与健康相关的参与,知识,或信任将被包括在内。研究传染病预防,传播或结果将被排除。两名评审员将从纳入的研究中提取数据。数据将在表格和数字中显示,以及叙事综合。
    背景:本范围审查将综合发表在同行评审期刊上的文章的数据。这篇综述的结果将描绘SNA在非传染性疾病健康研究中的应用方式。它将确定已大量使用SNA的卫生研究领域,以及可能需要未来进行系统审查的领域,以及在探索社会关系与健康结果之间的关系时,SNA仍然是较少使用的方法的机会领域。
    BACKGROUND: Social networks can affect health beliefs, behaviours and outcomes through various mechanisms, including social support, social influence and information diffusion. Social network analysis (SNA), an approach which emerged from the relational perspective in social theory, has been increasingly used in health research. This paper outlines the protocol for a scoping review of literature that uses social network analytical tools to examine the effects of social connections on individual non-communicable disease and health outcomes.
    METHODS: This scoping review will be guided by Arksey and O\'Malley\'s framework for conducting scoping reviews. A search of the electronic databases, Ovid Medline, PsycINFO, EMBASE and CINAHL, will be conducted in April 2024 using terms related to SNA. Two reviewers will independently assess the titles and abstracts, then the full text, of identified studies to determine whether they meet inclusion criteria. Studies that use SNA as a tool to examine the effects of social networks on individual physical health, mental health, well-being, health behaviours, healthcare utilisation, or health-related engagement, knowledge, or trust will be included. Studies examining communicable disease prevention, transmission or outcomes will be excluded. Two reviewers will extract data from the included studies. Data will be presented in tables and figures, along with a narrative synthesis.
    BACKGROUND: This scoping review will synthesise data from articles published in peer-reviewed journals. The results of this review will map the ways in which SNA has been used in non-communicable disease health research. It will identify areas of health research where SNA has been heavily used and where future systematic reviews may be needed, as well as areas of opportunity where SNA remains a lesser-used method in exploring the relationship between social connections and health outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:随着发病率的增加和对患者的显着影响,耳鸣已成为主要的疾病负担。缺乏对耳鸣具有既定功效的疗法。经皮耳迷走神经刺激(ta-VNS)正在研究作为耳鸣的潜在疗法,但是,由于不同研究的结果相互矛盾,目前的证据仍然没有定论。因此,该方案旨在综合和更新证据,以阐明ta-VNS对于缓解耳鸣是否有效和安全.
    方法:为了确定相关的随机对照试验(RCT),从成立到2023年12月,将搜索七个具有代表性的书目数据库:PubMed,Embase(通过OVID),科克伦图书馆,中国国家知识基础设施,王方数据库,中国生物医学文献数据库,和重庆贵宾中国科技期刊数据库。英文或中文出版物将被考虑列入。RCT将ta-VNS与积极治疗进行比较,没有干预,将包括成人患者主观性耳鸣的候诊者对照或假ta-VNS。对客观耳鸣的研究将被排除。主要结果是通过验证的量表测量的耳鸣症状严重程度。包括所有符合条件的试验,适用时,将使用RevManV.5.4.1软件通过荟萃分析进行定量分析。否则,将进行定性分析。纳入RCT的方法学质量将使用偏差风险2.0工具进行评估。敏感性分析,还将进行亚组分析和发表偏倚评估.建议的分级,评估,发展,并采用评估方法对证据的确定性进行评级。
    背景:本系统评价不需要道德批准,因为不会收集任何主要数据。结果将通过发表在同行评审的期刊上进行报告和传播。
    CRD42022351917。
    BACKGROUND: With an increasing incidence and significant effects on patients, tinnitus has become a major disease burden. There is a dearth of therapies with established efficacy for tinnitus. Transcutaneous auricular vagus nerve stimulation (ta-VNS) is being investigated as a potential therapy for tinnitus, but the current body of evidence remains inconclusive due to conflicting results across different studies. As a result, this protocol aims to synthesise and update the evidence to clarify whether ta-VNS is effective and safe for alleviating tinnitus.
    METHODS: To identify relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs), seven representative bibliographical databases will be searched from their inception to December 2023: PubMed, Embase (via OVID), Cochrane Library, Chinese National Knowledge Infrastructure, Wangfang Database, Chinese BioMedical Literature Database, and Chongqing VIP Chinese Science and Technology Periodical Database. Publications in English or Chinese will be considered for inclusion. RCTs comparing ta-VNS with active treatments, no intervention, waitlist control or sham ta-VNS in adult patients with subjective tinnitus will be included. Studies on objective tinnitus will be excluded. Primary outcome is tinnitus symptom severity measured by validated scales. With all eligible trials included, when applicable, quantitative analysis via meta-analyses will be performed using RevMan V.5.4.1 software. Otherwise, a qualitative analysis will be conducted. The methodological quality of the included RCTs will be assessed using the Risk of Bias 2.0 tool. Sensitivity analyses, subgroup analysis and publication bias evaluation will also be performed. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation approach will be used to grade the certainty of the evidence.
    BACKGROUND: Ethical approval is not required for this systematic review, as no primary data will be collected. The results will be reported and disseminated through publication in a peer-reviewed journal.
    UNASSIGNED: CRD42022351917.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号