PDF(Pubmed)
Abstract：
BACKGROUND: Digital textbooks (DTs), in which students read dozens of paragraph clips and systematise their level of knowledge through new questions, can be an alternative for digital natives to consider. Developing DTs is required when teaching digital natives at undergraduate nursing schools. A scoping review is required to understand the current status of DTs in nursing education.
METHODS: The preliminary search has been conducted to check whether the results produced by PubMed (NCBI) were published in English within 10 years and related to DTs. This study includes research targeting undergraduate nursing students. Literature will be further searched using Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Library and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL) databases. This scoping review will also consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods, texts and opinion documents; review studies; and pilot tests. The chosen studies will first be extracted based on the scoping review data extraction section of Joanna Briggs Institute to identify their general characteristics. DTs will be analysed based on the e-textbook framework: information goods, technology and stakeholders.
BACKGROUND: The Institutional Review Board of Nambu University, South Korea, approved this study for review exemption (approval number: 1041478-2022-HR-009). The results of this study will be disseminated through research results to nursing education institutions and hospitals. OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QS6WH.
METHODS: The preliminary search has been conducted to check whether the results produced by PubMed (NCBI) were published in English within 10 years and related to DTs. This study includes research targeting undergraduate nursing students. Literature will be further searched using Embase (Elsevier), Cochrane Library and Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL) databases. This scoping review will also consider quantitative, qualitative, and mixed research methods, texts and opinion documents; review studies; and pilot tests. The chosen studies will first be extracted based on the scoping review data extraction section of Joanna Briggs Institute to identify their general characteristics. DTs will be analysed based on the e-textbook framework: information goods, technology and stakeholders.
BACKGROUND: The Institutional Review Board of Nambu University, South Korea, approved this study for review exemption (approval number: 1041478-2022-HR-009). The results of this study will be disseminated through research results to nursing education institutions and hospitals. OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK: https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/QS6WH.
摘要：
背景：数字教科书（DTs），学生阅读几十个段落片段，并通过新问题系统化他们的知识水平，可以成为数字原住民考虑的替代方案。在本科护理学校教授数字原住民时，需要开发DTs。需要进行范围审查，以了解DTs在护理教育中的现状。
方法：已经进行了初步搜索，以检查PubMed（NCBI）产生的结果是否在10年内以英文发表，并且与DTs相关。本研究包括针对护理本科生的研究。将使用Embase（Elsevier）进一步搜索文献，Cochrane图书馆和护理和相关健康累积指数(CINAHL)数据库。这项范围审查还将考虑定量，定性，和混合的研究方法，文本和意见文件；审查研究；和试点测试。选择的研究将首先根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的范围审查审查数据提取部分进行提取，以确定其一般特征。将根据电子教科书框架：信息产品，技术和利益相关者。
背景：南布大学机构审查委员会，韩国,批准本研究审查豁免（批准号：1041478-2022-HR-009）。这项研究的结果将通过研究成果传播给护理教育机构和医院。开放式科学框架：https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF。IO/QS6WH。
方法：已经进行了初步搜索，以检查PubMed（NCBI）产生的结果是否在10年内以英文发表，并且与DTs相关。本研究包括针对护理本科生的研究。将使用Embase（Elsevier）进一步搜索文献，Cochrane图书馆和护理和相关健康累积指数(CINAHL)数据库。这项范围审查还将考虑定量，定性，和混合的研究方法，文本和意见文件；审查研究；和试点测试。选择的研究将首先根据乔安娜·布里格斯研究所的范围审查审查数据提取部分进行提取，以确定其一般特征。将根据电子教科书框架：信息产品，技术和利益相关者。
背景：南布大学机构审查委员会，韩国,批准本研究审查豁免（批准号：1041478-2022-HR-009）。这项研究的结果将通过研究成果传播给护理教育机构和医院。开放式科学框架：https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF。IO/QS6WH。
