outcome measures

成果措施
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    疼痛性神经瘤的新型手术治疗方法越来越多地被使用,但是,由于结果衡量标准的使用不一致,很难确定哪种获益最大。我们绘制了用于评估周围神经手术治疗成人获得性上肢截肢(UEA)患者症状性神经瘤的结局指标的最新文献。Medline,Embase,科克伦,从成立之初到2023年2月,我们对和CINAHL进行了搜索,以获得以英语编写的主要研究。搜索产生了1137篇文章,其中35个被列入最终分析。研究对疼痛的评估各不相同,健康相关生活质量(HRQOL),神经营养措施,心理和感觉运动功能,强调在关键领域的共识,但也揭示了主要研究中结果指标的使用和应用的显着异质性。我们的发现强调了建立反映UEA人群最佳证据和独特需求的共同标准的必要性。这包括制定核心成果集,利用多中心试验,并保持灵活性以适应患者报告结果测量(PROMs)研究的持续进步。
    Novel surgical treatments for painful neuromas are increasingly used, but determining which provides the greatest benefit has been difficult due to the inconsistent use of outcome measures. We mapped the current literature of outcome measures used to evaluate peripheral nerve surgery for the management of symptomatic neuromas in patients who underwent an adult-acquired upper extremity amputation (UEA). Medline, Embase, Cochrane, and CINAHL were searched for primary research written in the English language from inception to February 2023. The search yielded 1137 articles, of which 35 were included for final analysis. Studies varied in their assessment of pain, health-related quality of life (HRQOL), neurotrophic measures, psychological and sensorimotor function, highlighting a consensus on crucial domains but also revealing significant heterogeneity in the use and application of outcome measures among primary studies. Our findings highlight the need to establish common standards that reflect the best evidence and unique needs of the UEA population. This includes developing a core outcome set, utilizing multi-center trials, and maintaining flexibility to adapt to ongoing advancements in patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    据报道,多达40%的中风患者患有偏瘫肩痛(HSP)。HSP的原因通常是多因素的。告知适当的治疗,可靠/有效的评估至关重要。本范围审查的目的是整理主要结局为HSP的研究中使用的评估方法。并确定每种评估方法的使用频率。
    系统搜索,包括2000-2023年对MEDLINE进行的研究,EMBASE,CINAHL,AMED,BiomedCentral,和Cochrane图书馆数据库,使用了四个关键术语:“评估”,\"stroke\",“疼痛”和“肩膀”。包括所有以英语发表的符合评论纳入标准的主要研究。六个审阅者提取了数据。
    从124项研究中确定了总共29种HSP评估方法。常见的评估是:视觉模拟评分(n=75,60%),被动运动范围(n=65,52%),Fugl-Meyer评估(n=32,26%),肱骨半脱位(n=30,24%)和数值评定量表(n=27,22%)。
    为HSP确定了广泛的评估方法,有些比其他人使用得更多。全面评估,考虑疼痛的不同方面,包括严重程度和时间,功能,和心理负担,在这方面的实践需要能够指导适当的治疗。
    据报道,多达40%的中风患者出现偏瘫肩痛,文献中报道了多种评估方法。对肩痛的简单询问可能不足以为患者提供最佳的临床护理,理想的评估方法是同时考虑定量和定性信息。在制定新措施之前,报告的四种常见评估(视觉模拟评分;被动运动范围;Fugl-Meyer评估和数值评定量表)应结合使用.
    UNASSIGNED: Hemiplegic shoulder pain (HSP) is reported in up to 40% of people with stroke. Causes of HSP are often multifactorial. To inform appropriate treatment, reliable/valid assessments are critical. The aim of this scoping review was to collate assessment approaches used in studies where the primary outcome was HSP, and to identify how frequently each assessment approach was used.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic search, including studies from 2000-2023 was conducted of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, AMED, Biomed Central, and Cochrane Library databases, with four key terms used: \"assess\", \"stroke\", \"pain\" and \"shoulder\". All primary studies published in English language fulfilling the reviews inclusion criteria were included. Six reviewers extracted the data.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 29 assessment methods for HSP were identified from 124 studies. The common assessments were: Visual Analogue Scale (n = 75, 60%), Passive Range of Movement (n = 65, 52%), Fugl-Meyer Assessment (n = 32, 26%), glenohumeral subluxation (n = 30, 24%) and Numerical Rating Scale (n = 27, 22%).
    UNASSIGNED: A wide range of assessment approaches was identified for HSP, and some are used more than others. A fully comprehensive assessment that considers different aspects of pain including severity and timing, functioning, and the psychological burden, is needed in this area of practice to be able to guide appropriate treatment.
    Hemiplegic shoulder pain is reported in up to 40% of people with stroke and a wide range of assessments approaches are reported in the literature.Simple questioning about shoulder pain may not be adequate for providing the best clinical care to patients and an ideal assessment approach would be one that takes into consideration both quantitative and qualitative information.Until a new measure is developed, the four common assessments reported (Visual Analogue Scale; Passive Range of Movement; Fugl-Meyer Assessment and Numerical Rating Scale) should be used in combination.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    社会联系对于长期护理(LTC)居民的生活质量和护理至关重要。然而,关于如何衡量它缺乏共识,这限制了找到改善和损害LTC家庭社会联系的能力。因此,我们旨在系统地审查和评估LTC居民现有社会联系衡量标准的衡量标准属性,为了确定哪个,如果有的话,措施可以推荐。从成立到2022年4月,我们搜索了八个电子数据库,以获取有关社交联系(包括社交网络,互动,订婚,支持,隔离,连通性,和孤独)为LTC居民。我们使用基于Consensus的标准来选择健康测量指标(COSMIN)指南,以评估每个确定的测量报告的测量特性并提出建议。我们确定了62项研究,报告了38项措施;21项测量的生活质量,幸福感或生活满意度,并包括社会联系子量表或独立项目以及17项专门针对社会联系的措施。我们发现几乎没有关于心理测量特性的高质量证据,如足够的内容效度(n=0),结构效度(n=3),内部一致性(n=3),可靠性(n=1),测量误差(n=0),结构效度(n=4),标准有效性(n=0)和响应性(n=0)。没有任何措施在所有这些方面都表现出令人满意的心理测量特性,所以没有可以推荐使用。34项措施有可能被推荐,但需要进一步研究以评估其质量,其余4项不建议使用。因此,我们的审查发现,现有的措施没有足够的证据来建议评估LTC房屋居民的社会联系。需要对现有仪器进行进一步的验证和可靠性研究或开发新的措施,以便能够准确测量LTC居民的社会联系,以进行未来的观察和干预研究。
    社会联系是长期护理院以人为本的基础。现有措施的可靠性和有效性证据不足。根据现有证据,不能推荐使用当前的措施。未来的研究需要一个可靠和有效的社会联系衡量标准。
    Social connection is important for long-term care (LTC) residents\' quality of life and care. However, there is a lack of consensus on how to measure it and this limits ability to find what improves and impairs social connection in LTC homes. We therefore aimed to systematically review and evaluate the measurement properties of existing measures of social connection for LTC residents, to identify which, if any, measures can be recommended. We searched eight electronic databases from inception to April 2022 for studies which reported on psychometric properties of a measure of any aspect(s) of social connection (including social networks, interaction, engagement, support, isolation, connectedness, and loneliness) for LTC residents. We used COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) guidelines to evaluate the measurement properties reported for each identified measure and make recommendations. We identified 62 studies reporting on 38 measures; 21 measured quality of life, well-being or life satisfaction and included a social connection subscale or standalone items and 17 measures specifically targeted social connection. We found there was little high-quality evidence on psychometric properties such as sufficient content validity (n = 0), structural validity (n = 3), internal consistency (n = 3), reliability (n = 1), measurement error (n = 0), construct validity (n = 4), criterion validity (n = 0) and responsiveness (n = 0). No measures demonstrated satisfactory psychometric properties on all these aspects, so none could be recommended for use. Thirty-four measures have the potential to be recommended but require further research to assess their quality and the remaining four are not recommended for use. Our review therefore found that no existing measures have sufficient evidence to be recommended for assessment of social connection in residents of LTC homes. Further validation and reliability studies of existing instruments or the development of new measures are needed to enable accurate measurement of social connection in LTC residents for future observational and interventional studies.
    UNASSIGNED: Social connection is fundamental to person-centered care in long-term care homes.There is insufficient evidence for the reliability and validity of existing measures.No current measures can be recommended for use based on existing evidence.A reliable and valid measure of social connection is needed for future research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管髋关节或膝关节置换术通常是成功的干预措施,据记录,15%-30%的接受关节置换术的患者报告预后欠佳.这篇叙述性综述旨在概述有关髋关节或膝关节置换术后较差结局的管理的关键发现。
    方法:截至2023年11月,在三个电子数据库中对文章进行了全面搜索。只包括用英语写的研究,在研究设计和时间方面没有限制。
    结果:有效解决关节置换术后较差的结果需要彻底探索评估髋关节或膝关节置换术后恢复的适当方法,确保准确识别有风险或恢复较差的患者。在选择适当的结果测量工具时,应该考虑到各种因素,包括了解患者在整个康复过程中的优先事项,评估关节置换术后不同时间点结果测量工具的心理测量特性,了解如何结合/协调提供者评估和患者报告的结果指标,并确定解释结果测量分数的适当方法。然而,这些领域的进一步研究是必要的。此外,需要确定影响结局的关键可改变因素,并制定干预措施来管理这些因素.
    结论:对于髋关节或膝关节置换术后处于危险或未最佳康复状态的患者实施干预措施,越来越受到重视。为了实现这一点,确定最合适的结果衡量工具至关重要,与这些因素的恢复和管理较差相关的因素。
    OBJECTIVE: Although hip or knee arthroplasty is generally a successful intervention, it is documented that 15%-30% of patients undergoing arthroplasty report suboptimal outcomes. This narrative review aims to provide an overview of the key findings concerning the management of poorer outcomes after hip or knee arthroplasty.
    METHODS: A comprehensive search of articles was conducted up to November 2023 across three electronic databases. Only studies written in English were included, with no limitations applied regarding study design and time.
    RESULTS: Efficiently addressing poorer outcomes after arthroplasty necessitates a thorough exploration of appropriate methods for assessing recovery following hip or knee arthroplasty, ensuring accurate identification of patients at risk or experiencing poorer recovery. When selecting appropriate outcome measure tools, various factors should be taken into consideration, including understanding patients\' priorities throughout the recovery process, assessing psychometric properties of outcome measure tools at different time points after arthroplasty, understanding how to combine/reconcile provider-assessed and patient-reported outcome measures, and determining the appropriate methods to interpret outcome measure scores. However, further research in these areas is warranted. In addition, the identification of key modifiable factors affecting outcomes and the development of interventions to manage these factors are needed.
    CONCLUSIONS: There is growing attention paid to delivering interventions for patients at risk or not optimally recovering following hip or knee arthroplasty. To achieve this, it is essential to identify the most appropriate outcome measure tools, factors associated with poorer recovery and management of these factors.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:由于月经的止血挑战,患有VWD的女性患妇科并发症的风险增加。
    目的:回顾中重度VWD女性的妇科出血症状及其管理。
    方法:对2010年1月至2020年12月期间参加多学科联合诊所的中度和重度VWD女性前瞻性收集的数据进行回顾性队列分析。使用PBAC从电子患者记录中收集对治疗方案的反应数据,使用SF-36评分进行生活质量(QoL)评估,血红蛋白和铁蛋白与治疗前的值比较。
    结果:在诊所管理的67名妇女中,均报告了大量月经出血(HMB)。80%的女性需要同时使用激素药物和氨甲环酸的联合治疗。第一年的PBAC成绩总体提高了64%,在21%的病例中反映了QoL,SF-36评分改善了35%,贫血得到了纠正。持续治疗的累积效果最终导致失血减少,5年后PBAC评分总体提高71%。十分之一的女性需要妇科病理学手术治疗。不遵守是50%青少年中计划外出血过多的原因。三年后,五分之一的女性经历了症状复发,其中46%成为围绝经期和54%停止激素治疗,由于对生育的担忧,脱发和体重增加。
    结论:HMB的管理需要MDT的仔细监测和随访,妇科团队与HTC密切合作。HMB的控制通常需要联合治疗。
    BACKGROUND: Women with VWD have an increased risk of gynaecological complications due to haemostatic challenges of menstruation.
    OBJECTIVE: Review gynecological bleeding symptoms and their management in women with moderate-severe VWD.
    METHODS: Retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data for women with moderate and severe VWD attending a joint multidisciplinary clinic between January 2010 and December 2020. Data was collected from electronic patient records on response to treatment options using PBAC, quality of life (QoL) assessment using SF-36 scores, haemoglobin and ferritin in comparison to pre-treatment values.
    RESULTS: Of the 67 women managed in the clinic; all reported heavy menstrual bleeding (HMB). Combination therapy with concurrent hormonal agents and tranexamic acid was required in 80% of women. There was an overall 64% improvement in PBAC scores in the first year, reflecting on QoL with 35% improvement in SF-36 score and correction of anaemia in 21% of cases. The cumulative effect of continued treatment culminated in greater reduction of blood loss, with an overall 71% improvement in PBAC scores by 5 years. One in 10 women required surgical treatment for a gynaecological pathology. Non-compliance was the cause of excessive unscheduled bleeding in 50% of adolescents. After 3 years, one in five women experienced a relapse of symptom, of whom 46% became perimenopausal and 54% discontinued hormonal treatments due to concerns about fertility, hair loss and weight gain.
    CONCLUSIONS: Management of HMB requires careful monitoring and follow-up by MDT with close collaboration between the gynaecology team and HTC. Control of HMB often requires a combination therapy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定结果测量工具(OMIs)以评估声带萎缩和/或沟患者的治疗效果。
    方法:通过搜索Pubmed和EMBASE对2021年3月之前发布的记录进行系统审查。纳入的研究报告成人(>18岁)由于声带萎缩引起的声门功能不全,伴有或不伴有沟,他们被纳入一项随机对照试验,一项非随机对照试验,病例对照研究或队列研究。所有纳入的研究都描述了至少一项结果测量的干预措施。
    结果:共确定了5456项研究。删除重复项后,筛选标题和摘要,并对选定的记录进行全文筛选,最终分析包括34种出版物。根据DeJonckere等人的ELS方案,从这50个单独的OMI中进行记录和分类。(欧耳拱门奥托鼻喉258:77-82,2001)。由于大多数OMI被用于多项研究,报告的OMI总数为265。十九(19)个单独的OMI占报告的80%。根据类别,最常用的OMI是:VHI和VHI-10(主观评估);GRBAS的G(感知评估);F0,抖动和闪光(声学评估);MPT和MFR(空气动力学评估)以及声门闭合和粘膜波(内窥镜评估)。在这些OMI中,VHI具有90%的高的显著性百分比。
    结论:本系统评价确定了由于声带萎缩和/或沟而导致声门功能不全的患者中最常用的OMI,这是朝着为该人群定义核心结果集(COS)迈出的一步。
    238274。
    OBJECTIVE: Identifying outcome measurements instruments (OMIs) to evaluate treatment efficacy in patients with vocal fold atrophy and/or sulcus.
    METHODS: Systematic review of records published before March 2021 by searching Pubmed and EMBASE. Included studies reported on adults (> 18 year) with dysphonia caused by glottic insufficiency due to vocal fold atrophy with or without sulcus, who were enrolled into a randomized controlled trial, a non-randomized controlled trial, a case-controlled study or a cohort study. All included studies described an intervention with at least one outcome measurement.
    RESULTS: A total of 5456 studies were identified. After removing duplicates, screening title and abstract and full text screening of selected records, 34 publications were included in final analysis. From these 50 separate OMIs were recorded and categorized according to the ELS protocol by DeJonckere et al. (Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 258: 77-82, 2001). With most OMIs being used in multiple studies the total number of OMIs reported was 265. Nineteen (19) individual OMIs accounted for 80% of reports. The most frequently used OMIs according to category were: VHI and VHI-10 (subjective evaluation); G of GRBAS (perceptual evaluation); F0, Jitter and Shimmer (acoustic evaluation); MPT and MFR (aerodynamic evaluation) and glottic closure and mucosal wave (endoscopic evaluation). Of these OMIs VHI had a high percentage of significance of 90%.
    CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review identifies the most used OMIs in patients with glottic incompetency due to vocal fold atrophy and/or sulcus as a step toward defining a Core Outcome Set (COS) for this population.
    UNASSIGNED: 238274.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    创伤性脑损伤(TBI)是全球范围内导致死亡和残疾的主要原因。随机对照试验(RCTs)是评估干预效果的基石。为了评估临床研究的方法论,我们进行了一项系统评价,评估了1983年至2023年10月31日期间针对中重度成人TBI早期阶段的RCT中使用的不同结局.我们提取了每个结果,并根据COMET和OMERACT框架(核心区,广泛的领域,目标域和最终结果)。包括190项RCT,包括52,010名参与者。报告了557个结局,并将其分为以下核心领域:病理生理表现(169个RCT(88.9%)),生命影响(117项随机对照试验(61.6%)),死亡(94项随机对照试验(49.5%)),资源使用(72项RCTs(37.9%))和不良事件(41项RCTs(21.6%))。我们确定了29个宽域和89个目标域。在目标域中,身体机能(111(58.4%)),死亡率(94(49.5%)),颅内压力目标域(68(35.8%)),血流动力学(53(27.9%))最常见.结果主要由临床医生报告(177(93.2%)),而患者报告的结果很少报告(11(5.8%))。在我们的审查中,TBI临床研究终点选择存在显著异质性.迫切需要共识和同质性,以提高该领域临床研究的质量。
    Traumatic brain injury (TBI) is a leading cause of death and disability worldwide. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) are the cornerstone to evaluate the efficacy of an intervention. To assess the methodology of clinical research, we performed a systematic review that evaluated the different outcomes used in RCTs targeting the early phase of moderate-to-severe adult TBI from 1983 to October 31, 2023. We extracted each outcome and organized them according to the COMET and OMERACT framework (core area, broad domains, target domains, and finally outcomes). A total of 190 RCTs were included, including 52,010 participants. A total of 557 outcomes were reported and classified between the following core areas: pathophysiological manifestations [169 RCTs (88.9%)], life impact [117 RCTs (61.6%)], death [94 RCTs (49.5%)], resource use [72 RCTs (37.9%)], and adverse events [41 RCTs (21.6%)]. We identified 29 broad domains and 89 target domains. Among target domains, physical functioning [111 (58.4%)], mortality [94 (49.5%)], intracranial pressure target domain [68 (35.8%)], and hemodynamics [53 (27.9%)] were the most frequent. Outcomes were mostly clinician-reported [177 (93.2%)], while patient-reported outcomes were rarely reported [11 (5.8%)]. In our review, there was significant heterogeneity in the choice of end-points in TBI clinical research. There is an urgent need for consensus and homogeneity to improve the quality of clinical research in this area.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:确定临床环境中常用的体能测量是否可以区分跌倒和非跌倒,并预测患有痴呆症的老年人的跌倒。
    方法:系统评价和荟萃分析。
    方法:居住在社区的老年痴呆症患者,医院,和住宅护理设施。
    方法:MEDLINE,Embase,PsycINFO,CINAHL,SPORTDiscus,Cochrane图书馆,和PEDro数据库从开始到2023年12月27日进行搜索(PROSPERO注册号:CRD42022303670)。回顾性或前瞻性研究评估了老年人痴呆症的身体表现指标与跌倒之间的关系。随机效应模型用于计算跌倒者和非跌倒者之间每个身体表现指标的标准化平均差(SMD)和95%CI。对纵向研究进行了敏感性分析,以确定物理性能指标预测未来跌倒的能力。
    结果:本综述纳入28项研究(n=3542)。5次椅台试验[SMD=0.23(0.01,0.45)],Berg平衡量表[SMD=-0.52(-0.87,-0.17)],站在地板上[SMD=0.25(0.07,0.43)]和泡沫表面[SMD=0.45(0.25,0.66)]时的姿势摇摆,短物理性能电池总分[SMD=-0.46(-0.66,-0.27)]可以区分跌倒者和非跌倒者。敏感性分析表明,在纵向队列研究中,步态速度可以预测未来的跌倒[SMD=-0.29(-0.49,-0.08)]。亚组分析显示,步态速度[SMD=-0.21(-0.38,-0.05)]和TimedUpandGo测试[SMD=0.54(0.16,0.92)]可以识别留在住宅护理设施或医院的跌倒者。
    结论:5次椅子站立测试,伯格平衡量表,站在地板和泡沫表面上时的姿势摇摆,短体能电池可用于预测老年痴呆症患者的跌倒。步态速度和TimedUpandGo测试可用于预测住院的老年痴呆症患者的跌倒。建议临床医生使用这些身体表现指标来评估患有痴呆症的老年人的跌倒风险。
    OBJECTIVE: To determine whether physical performance measures commonly used in clinical settings can discriminate fallers from nonfallers and predict falls in older adults with dementia.
    METHODS: Systematic review and meta-analysis.
    METHODS: Older adults with dementia residing in the community, hospitals, and residential care facilities.
    METHODS: MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus, the Cochrane Library, and the PEDro databases were searched from inception until December 27, 2023 (PROSPERO registration number: CRD42022303670). Retrospective or prospective studies that evaluated the associations between physical performance measures and falls in older adults with dementia were included. A random effects model was used to calculate the standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% CI for each physical performance measure between fallers and nonfallers. Sensitivity analyses were conducted on the longitudinal studies to determine the ability of physical performance measures to predict future falls.
    RESULTS: Twenty-eight studies were included in this review (n = 3542). The 5-time chair stand test [SMD = 0.23 (0.01, 0.45)], the Berg Balance Scale [SMD = -0.52 (-0.87, -0.17)], postural sway when standing on the floor [SMD = 0.25 (0.07, 0.43)] and on a foam surface [SMD = 0.45 (0.25, 0.66)], and the Short Physical Performance Battery total score [SMD = -0.46 (-0.66, -0.27)] could discriminate fallers from nonfallers. Sensitivity analyses showed that gait speed could predict future falls in longitudinal cohort studies [SMD = -0.29 (-0.49, -0.08)]. Subgroup analyses showed that gait speed [SMD = -0.21 (-0.38, -0.05)] and the Timed Up and Go test [SMD = 0.54 (0.16, 0.92)] could identify fallers staying in residential care facilities or hospitals.
    CONCLUSIONS: The 5-time chair stand test, the Berg Balance Scale, postural sway when standing on the floor and a foam surface, and the Short Physical Performance Battery can be used to predict falls in older adults with dementia. Gait speed and the Timed Up and Go test can be used to predict falls in institutionalized older adults with dementia. Clinicians are recommended to use these physical performance measures to assess fall risk in older adults with dementia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:研究髋臼骨折的临床试验在其研究结果和相应的测量方面是不均匀的。标准化可以促进研究成果的可比性和汇集,这将导致关于髋臼骨折最佳治疗的知识增加,导致长期循证治疗决策和改善患者护理。本系统评价的目的是确定髋臼骨折治疗研究报告的结果及其测量结果,以开发一个核心结果集,其中包含将纳入未来研究的最相关的结果指标。
    方法:以英语和德语发表的研究,包括16岁及以上的患者,手术治疗的髋臼骨折,将包括在内。非手术治疗的研究,病理性骨折,多发性创伤患者,年龄小于16岁的患者将被排除,因为在这些病例中,其他结局可能是值得关注的.任何前瞻性和回顾性研究都将包括在内。系统审查将被排除在外,但他们纳入的研究将被筛选为合格。这些文献将在MEDLINE上搜索,中部,WebofScience,ClinicalTrials.gov,世卫组织ICTRP。将使用试验结果报告偏差分类系统评估选择性报告结果的风险。测量相同结果的异质定义结果将被分组,随后使用有效性试验计划中的核心结果度量的分类法分类为结果域。
    结论:预计将包括大量研究,许多结果将使用不同的定义和测量工具来识别。这种系统评价的局限性在于,只有以前调查的结果才能被检测到,从而忽视潜在的相关结果。
    背景:PROSPEROCRD42022357644.
    BACKGROUND: Clinical trials investigating acetabular fractures are heterogeneous in their investigated outcomes and their corresponding measurements. Standardization may facilitate comparability and pooling of research results, which would lead to an increase in knowledge about the optimal treatment of acetabular fractures, resulting in long-term evidence-based treatment decisions and improvements in patient care. The aim of this systematic review is to identify the reported outcomes and their measurements from studies on treatments for acetabular fractures to develop a core outcome set which contains the most relevant outcome measures to be included in future studies.
    METHODS: Studies published in English and German including patients aged 16 years and older, with a surgically treated acetabular fracture, will be included. Studies with nonsurgical treatment, pathologic fractures, polytraumatized patients, and patients younger than 16 years of age will be excluded because other outcomes may be of interest in these cases. Any prospective and retrospective study will be included. Systematic reviews will be excluded, but their included studies will be screened for eligibility. The literature will be searched on MEDLINE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and WHO ICTRP. Risk of selective reporting of outcomes will be assessed using the Outcome Reporting Bias in Trials classification system. Heterogeneously defined outcomes that measure the same outcome will be grouped and subsequently categorized into outcome domains using the taxonomy of the Core Outcome Measures in Effectiveness Trials Initiative.
    CONCLUSIONS: It is expected that a high number of studies will be included, and many outcomes will be identified using different definitions and measurement instruments. A limitation of this systematic review is that only previously investigated outcomes will be detected, thus disregarding potentially relevant outcomes.
    BACKGROUND: PROSPERO CRD42022357644.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    十项测试(TT)是一种触摸阈值测试,通过将受伤区域与对侧未受伤区域进行比较来量化感觉辨别。很快,简单,设备自由和可重复。然而,作为一种主观衡量,TT的可靠性和适用性需要进一步调查。这篇评论旨在调查在所有年龄段的人群中,与广泛接受的Weinstein增强感觉测试(WEST)相比,TT是否具有更高的考试者间和内部可靠性。
    从1997年1月至2023年9月对主要数据库进行了系统搜索,并遵守了系统审查和荟萃分析方案的首选报告项目。结果用叙事方法评估。根据诊断准确性研究质量评估两个工具对纳入的文章进行了严格评估。
    这篇评论包括五篇文章。根据三项不同的研究,证明了高的检查者间可靠性,组内相关系数(ICC)值为0.91和0.95,kappa统计量为1。内部检验可靠性显示出一些差异,一项研究报告6例中有4例具有显著的ICC值。两项研究证实,TT结果与WEST的结果一致,每个都呈现-0.71的斯皮尔曼等级系数。
    我们的发现强调了TT的高考试者间可靠性,尽管它的内部审查可靠性表现出一些不一致。有趣的是,某些研究声称它优于西方。为了验证TT在临床环境中的使用,更严格的研究,特别是那些将术前TT结果与术中神经损伤评估进行比较的研究,是必不可少的。
    UNASSIGNED: The Ten Test (TT) is a touch threshold test that quantifies sensory discrimination by comparing an injured area with a contralateral uninjured area. It\'s quick, simple, equipment-free and repeatable. However, as a subjective measure, the TT\'s reliability and applicability need further investigation. This review aimed to investigate if the TT has superior inter- and intra-examiner reliability compared to the widely accepted Weinstein Enhanced Sensory Test (WEST) in a human population of all ages.
    UNASSIGNED: A systematic search was conducted on major databases from January 1997 to September 2023 and adhered to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Protocol. Outcomes were assessed with a narrative approach. The included articles were critically appraised according to the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies two tool.
    UNASSIGNED: This review included five articles. High inter-examiner reliability was demonstrated with intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) values of 0.91 and 0.95, alongside a kappa statistic of 1, as reported by three distinct studies. Intra-examiner reliability displayed some variance, with one study reporting a significant ICC value in four out of six instances. Two studies corroborated that the TT results corresponded with the findings of WEST, each presenting a Spearman rank coefficient of -0.71.
    UNASSIGNED: Our findings underscore the TT\'s high inter-examiner reliability, though its intra-examiner reliability exhibited some inconsistencies. Interestingly, certain studies claimed its superiority over the WEST. To validate the TT\'s use in the clinical setting, more rigorous studies, particularly those comparing pre-operative TT outcomes with intraoperative nerve damage evaluations, are essential.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号