outcome measures

成果措施
  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    肺炎是一种引起肺部气囊炎症的感染。冠状动脉疾病是一种以冠状动脉斑块积聚为特征的疾病,为心脏提供血液。这种阻塞限制了血液流动,导致胸痛(心绞痛)和,在极端情况下,心脏病发作.成功治疗诸如外周动脉疾病和冠状动脉疾病的重要部分是球囊血管成形术。一种常用的治疗狭窄或阻塞动脉的医疗程序。该病例研究的主题是血管成形术后患有肺炎的83岁男子。病人在血管成形术后得了肺炎,这是通过适当的药物和心肺理疗来管理的。患者被插管并转诊接受心肺理疗。理疗治疗,如轻微的胸部振动,吸吮,最初进行了床活动锻炼。拔管后,物理治疗继续深呼吸练习,咳嗽技巧,放松技术,上肢和下肢的活动能力锻炼。为了最大程度地减少血管成形术后的并发症并使他能够恢复日常活动,必须进行有效的身体康复。几项成果措施,就像ICU行动量表一样,CURB-65得分,胸部X线评分,用于在康复期间监测患者的进展。肺康复计划的好处强调需要量身定制的方法来满足个体患者对全面康复的需求。
    Pneumonia is an infection that causes inflammation in the air sacs of the lungs. Coronary artery disease is a condition characterized by the buildup of plaque in the coronary arteries, which supply blood to the heart. This obstruction restricts blood flow, resulting in chest pain (angina) and, in extreme cases, heart attacks. An important part of successfully treating diseases like peripheral artery disease and coronary artery disease is balloon angioplasty, a commonly used medical procedure for treating narrowed or clogged arteries. An 83-year-old man who had pneumonia after angioplasty was the subject of this case study. The patient had pneumonia after angioplasty, which was managed by proper medications and cardio-respiratory physiotherapy. The patient was intubated and referred for cardio-respiratory physiotherapy. Physiotherapy treatments like mild chest vibrations, suctioning, and bed mobility exercises were given initially. After extubation, physiotherapy treatment continued with deep breathing exercises, coughing techniques, relaxation techniques, and mobility exercises for the upper limbs and lower limbs. Effective physical rehabilitation was necessary in order to minimize complications following angioplasty and allow him to resume his daily activities. Several outcome measures, like the ICU mobility scale, CURB-65 score, and chest X-ray grading scores, were used to monitor the patient\'s progress during rehabilitation. The benefits of pulmonary rehabilitation programs emphasize the need for tailored approaches in addressing individual patient needs for comprehensive recovery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    帕金森病(Parkinson’sdisease,PD)是一种以各种运动和非运动症状为特征的退行性神经系统疾病,可导致不同程度的功能损害。关键的神经病理学发现包括含有突触核蛋白的路易体和黑质中多巴胺能神经元的丢失,减少对自愿运动的便利。这种疾病的特点是运动迟缓,刚性,和颤抖。这里,我们介绍了一个56岁的男子因震颤而寻求神经康复的案例,运动缓慢,和弱点。康复计划是精心设计的,每周都有目标。康复持续了六周,在此期间,个体在所有测量结果中显示出积极的改善。虚拟现实和exergame技术已成为增强PD平衡和步态的重要工具。我们的研究使用了结果指标,如统一帕金森病评定量表,世界卫生组织生活质量量表,和Barthel指数。神经物理疗法在促进患者功能康复方面发挥着重要作用。
    Parkinson\'s disease (PD) is a degenerative neurological illness characterized by various motor and non-motor symptoms that can lead to varying degrees of functional impairment. Key neuropathological findings include Lewy bodies containing synuclein and the loss of dopaminergic neurons in the substantia nigra, reducing the facilitation of voluntary movements. The disease is marked by bradykinesia, rigidity, and tremors. Here, we present the case of a 56-year-old man who sought neurorehabilitation due to tremors, slowness of movements, and weakness. The rehabilitation plan was carefully devised with weekly goals. The rehabilitation spanned six weeks, during which the individual showed positive improvement in all measured outcomes. Virtual reality and exergame technologies have emerged as prominent tools for enhancing balance and gait in PD. Our study utilized outcome measures such as the Unified Parkinson\'s Disease Rating Scale, the World Health Organization Quality-of-Life Scale, and the Barthel Index. Neurophysiotherapy plays a significant role in enhancing a patient\'s functional rehabilitation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:标准结果集能够实现基于价值的医疗服务评估。尽管专家意见的达成是使用诸如修改的德尔菲过程之类的方法进行的,缺乏从文献中提取候选结果的标准化指南.因此,我们的目的是描述一种方法,以获得可能纳入标准结果集的候选结果的综合列表.
    方法:本研究描述了一种迭代饱和方法,使用从系统的文献检索中随机选择的批次来开发一长串候选结果以评估医疗保健.在此方法之前,可以对相关注册表和临床实践指南以及数据可视化技术(例如,WordCloud)进行可选的基准审查,以潜在地减少迭代次数。国际健康结果措施联盟的发展心脏瓣膜疾病集用于说明该方法。使用1000个模拟案例的数据验证了迭代饱和方法的批量截止选择。
    结果:模拟表明,最初使用100条批次平均达到98%(范围92-100%)的饱和度,在后续批次中有25篇。如果没有首先从基准审查或数据可视化中确定结果,则需要平均4.7轮(范围1-9)的25篇新文章来达到饱和。
    结论:本文提出了一种标准化方法来确定标准结果集的相关候选结果。这种方法在进行文献综述以识别候选结果时,在全面性和可行性之间建立了平衡。
    Standard outcome sets enable the value-based evaluation of health care delivery. Whereas the attainment of expert opinion has been structured using methods such as the modified-Delphi process, standardized guidelines for extraction of candidate outcomes from literature are lacking. As such, we aimed to describe an approach to obtain a comprehensive list of candidate outcomes for potential inclusion in standard outcome sets.
    This study describes an iterative saturation approach, using randomly selected batches from a systematic literature search to develop a long list of candidate outcomes to evaluate healthcare. This approach can be preceded with an optional benchmark review of relevant registries and Clinical Practice Guidelines and data visualization techniques (e.g. as a WordCloud) to potentially decrease the number of iterations. The development of the International Consortium of Health Outcome Measures Heart valve disease set is used to illustrate the approach. Batch cutoff choices of the iterative saturation approach were validated using data of 1000 simulated cases.
    Simulation showed that on average 98% (range 92-100%) saturation is reached using a 100-article batch initially, with 25 articles in the subsequent batches. On average 4.7 repeating rounds (range 1-9) of 25 new articles were necessary to achieve saturation if no outcomes are first identified from a benchmark review or a data visualization.
    In this paper a standardized approach is proposed to identify relevant candidate outcomes for a standard outcome set. This approach creates a balance between comprehensiveness and feasibility in conducting literature reviews for the identification of candidate outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在中风物理治疗中,强烈建议采用预后措施,然而,现有的大多数研究都是从提供者的角度进行的。结合治疗师的观点了解患者对结果的看法可能有助于更好地支持患者的参与度和自主性。
    本研究的目的是探讨患者和治疗师对中风后物理治疗结果测量的看法。
    这项对加拿大康复机构的定性案例研究基于以患者为导向的研究原则,研究团队中嵌入了三名患者合作伙伴。数据收集包括图表评论,物理治疗会议的观察,患者访谈,和治疗师访谈。使用主题分析对观察结果和访谈笔录进行了分析。
    10名患者和7名治疗师参加。分析揭示了以下两个主题:1)跟踪进展;和2)伙伴关系。跟踪进展包括患者对改善的期望,客观测量变化的重要性和每天观察到的功能改善。伙伴关系描述了治疗师和病人之间的关系,包括沟通,鼓励和肯定,治疗师作为专家,自主性从治疗师逐渐转变为病人。
    患者重视结果测量的客观结果,并受到可测量变化的鼓励。最大化使用物理治疗结果措施可以改善患者的参与度并支持关系自主性。
    UNASSIGNED: Outcome measures are highly recommended in stroke physical therapy, however, most of the existing research has been performed from the provider perspective. Understanding the patient perspective of outcome measures in conjunction with the therapist perspective may help to better support patient engagement and autonomy.
    UNASSIGNED: The purpose of this study was to explore patient and therapist perspectives on physical therapy outcome measures post-stroke.
    UNASSIGNED: This qualitative case study of a Canadian rehabilitation facility is based on patient-oriented research principles, with three patient partners embedded in the research team. Data collection included chart reviews, observations of physical therapy sessions, patient interviews, and therapist interviews. Field notes of observations and interview transcripts were analyzed using thematic analysis.
    UNASSIGNED: Ten patients and seven therapists participated. Analysis revealed the following two themes: 1) tracking progress; and 2) partnership. Tracking progress included the expectations patients had for improvement, the importance of objectively measuring change and the functional improvement observed day by day. Partnership described the relationship between therapist and patient including communication, encouragement and affirmation, the therapist as expert and the gradual shift in autonomy from therapist to patient.
    UNASSIGNED: Patients valued the objective results of outcome measures and were encouraged by measurable changes. Maximizing the use of physical therapy outcome measures may improve patient engagement and support relational autonomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:选择临床质量登记册中包含的患者结局对于可比较和相关的数据收集至关重要。理想情况下,可以使用统一的结果框架对登记册中包含的结果进行分类,引导成果测量的发展,并最终通过基准测试和注册研究实现更好的患者护理。这项研究的目的是将临床质量注册结果与COMET分类法进行比较,以评估其在注册环境中的适用性。
    方法:我们进行了一项组织案例研究,其中包括HUS赫尔辛基大学医院使用的63个躯体临床质量注册表的结果,芬兰。根据COMET分类法对结果进行提取和分类,并评估分类法的适用性。
    结果:HUS临床质量登记显示,在结果领域和措施数量上有很大差异。98%的人出现了生理结果,所有的资源使用,和62%的登记册中的功能域。在48%的注册表中发现了患者报告的结果指标。
    结论:发现COMET分类法主要适用于临床质量登记册中对结果的选择进行分类,但建议改进。HUS赫尔辛基大学医院临床质量登记册存在不同的成熟度水平,在生活影响结果和结果优先次序方面显示出改进的空间。本文提供了一个对临床质量注册中包括的结果选择进行分类的示例,以及其他注册评估人员的比较点。
    BACKGROUND: The choice of what patient outcomes are included in clinical quality registries is crucial for comparable and relevant data collection. Ideally, a uniform outcome framework could be used to classify the outcomes included in registries, steer the development of outcome measurement, and ultimately enable better patient care through benchmarking and registry research. The aim of this study was to compare clinical quality registry outcomes against the COMET taxonomy to assess its suitability in the registry context.
    METHODS: We conducted an organizational case study that included outcomes from 63 somatic clinical quality registries in use at HUS Helsinki University Hospital, Finland. Outcomes were extracted and classified according to the COMET taxonomy and the suitability of the taxonomy was assessed.
    RESULTS: HUS clinical quality registries showed great variation in outcome domains and in number of measures. Physiological outcomes were present in 98%, resource use in all, and functioning domains in 62% of the registries. Patient-reported outcome measures were found in 48% of the registries.
    CONCLUSIONS: The COMET taxonomy was found to be mostly suitable for classifying the choice of outcomes in clinical quality registries, but improvements are suggested. HUS Helsinki University Hospital clinical quality registries exist at different maturity levels, showing room for improvement in life impact outcomes and in outcome prioritization. This article offers an example of classifying the choice of outcomes included in clinical quality registries and a comparison point for other registry evaluators.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    散发性包涵体肌炎(IBM)是一种使人衰弱的疾病,会导致步行障碍和手功能丧失。耶鲁IBM注册中心(IBMR)于2016年11月推出,旨在解决IBM自然历史数据中的知识差距。注册表界面提供了一个基于IBM功能评级量表(IBM-FRS)的IBM个性化索引计算器(IBM-PIC)。虽然计算器基于IBM-FRS,它没有直接与IBM-FRS评分进行比较。因此,在这项研究中,我们将该计算器中患者报告的IBM-PIC评分与医师获得的IBM-FRS评分进行了比较.
    IBM-FRS在最近一次IBM-PIC进入IBMR的两周内通过电话给35名参与者。要比较IBM-FRS和IBM-PIC分数之间的协议,进行评分者间相关系数(ICC)分析。对于个别问题,使用了FleissKappa统计数据。
    35名活跃的IBM-PIC用户参加了会议。80%的参与者是男性,91%是白人白种人。该组报告的IBM-FRS评分为23.5±7.4(范围1-38)。医师管理的IBM-FRS评分与IBM-PIC之间的评分者间相关系数(ICC)为0.98(0.96-0.99)。除了手写和精细运动技能外,在IBM-FRS的所有问题上都达成了中等到实质性的共识。
    IBM-PIC是医师获得的IBM-FRS评分的可靠指标。预计该在线平台将是在临床实践和研究中评估IBM严重程度和远程监测疾病进展的有价值的工具。
    Sporadic inclusion body myositis (IBM) is a debilitating disease which leads to impaired ambulation and loss of hand function. Yale IBM Registry (IBMR) was launched in November 2016 to address the knowledge gap in IBM natural history data. The registry interface provides an IBM personalized index calculator (IBM-PIC) based on the IBM-functional rating scale (IBM-FRS). While the calculator is based on the IBM-FRS, it has not been directly compared to the IBM-FRS score. Therefore, in this study, we compared the patient-reported IBM-PIC score from this calculator with the physician-obtained IBM-FRS score.
    IBM-FRS was administered over the phone within two weeks of their most recent IBM-PIC entry in the IBMR to 35 participants. To compare the agreement between IBM-FRS and IBM-PIC scores, Interrater Correlation Coefficient (ICC) analysis was performed. For individual questions, Fleiss Kappa statistics was used.
    Thirty-five active IBM-PIC users participated. Eighty percent of the participants were men, and 91% were White Caucasians. The reported IBM-FRS score of this group was 23.5 ± 7.4 (range 1-38). The Interrater Correlation Coefficient (ICC) between the physician-administered IBM-FRS score and the IBM-PIC was 0.98 (0.96-0.99). There was moderate to substantial agreement on all the questions on IBM-FRS except for handwriting and fine motor skills.
    IBM-PIC is a reliable indicator of the IBM-FRS score obtained by the physician. It is anticipated that this online platform will be a valuable tool for assessing IBM severity and monitoring disease progression remotely both in clinical practice and research studies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    基于COnsensus的健康测量指标选择标准(COSMIN)是一项国际计划,提供标准化和经过验证的工具来指导医疗保健中患者报告结果指标的评估。
    探索使用COSMIN的一套新工具来评估言语和语言治疗师(SLT)可用的一项结果测量研究。
    我们使用了COSMIN工具来评估七项研究和一份用户手册,该手册报告了“关注六岁以下儿童的结果”(FOCUS)的测量属性。在世界各地的各种环境中使用的对学龄前儿童交际参与的一种经过验证的衡量标准。
    使用COSMIN指南,FOCUS被归类为“A类”工具,因为有足够的证据支持其内容有效性和内部一致性。根据COSMIN指南,这意味着可以推荐使用FOCUS。支持FOCUS测量属性的证据质量获得了“中等”的评级,这意味着用户可以对其测量属性有适度的信心。由于FOCUS的用户可能不清楚COSMIN工具的这些评级,我们提供了更具体的建议。
    COSMIN工具提供了详细的标准,以支持对SLT可用的结果度量进行评估。然而,观察到一些限制,并提供了支持应用COSMIN工具的建议。本文添加的内容收集结果数据对于确保言语和语言治疗有效至关重要。在COSMIN开发之前,对结果测量工具的测量特性进行评估的方式缺乏标准。本文对现有知识的补充本文使用了重点,衡量学龄前儿童在言语和语言治疗中的交际参与结果,以案例为例说明COSMIN工具的应用。在这样做的时候,强调了当前COSMIN工具在评估结果测量工具质量方面的优势和局限性。这项工作的潜在或实际临床意义是什么?COSMIN工具提供了一步一步,评估结果工具中各种测量特性的标准化方法。由于COSMIN工具的现有限制,评估应提供明确和具体的建议,以便结果衡量标准的使用者(例如,SLT,研究人员)可以确定每种仪器的适当用途。
    The COnsensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN) is an international initiative that offers standardized and validated tools to guide the appraisal of patient-reported outcome measures in healthcare.
    To explore the use of a new set of tools from the COSMIN to appraise studies on one outcome measure available to speech and language therapists (SLTs).
    We used the COSMIN tools to appraise seven studies and a user manual that reported the measurement properties of the Focus on the Outcomes of Children Under Six (FOCUS), a validated measure of pre-schoolers\' communicative participation that is used in various contexts around the world.
    Using COSMIN guidelines, the FOCUS was categorized as a \'category A\' tool because there was a sufficient level of evidence to support its content validity and internal consistency. According to the COSMIN guidelines, this means that the FOCUS can be recommended for use. The quality of evidence supporting measurement properties of the FOCUS received a rating of \'moderate\', meaning users can have moderate confidence in its measurement properties. Since these ratings from the COSMIN tools may be unclear to users of the FOCUS, we have provided more specific recommendations.
    The COSMIN tools offer detailed standards to support the appraisal of outcome measures available to SLTs. However, several limitations were observed, and recommendations to support the application of the COSMIN tools are provided. What this paper adds What is already known on the subject Collecting outcome data is essential to ensure speech and language therapy is effective. Until the development of COSMIN there was a lack of standards in the way the measurement properties of outcome measure instruments were appraised. What this paper adds to existing knowledge This paper used the FOCUS, a measure of pre-schoolers\' communicative participation outcomes in speech and language therapy, as a case example to illustrate the applications of the COSMIN tools. In doing so, the strengths and limitations of the current COSMIN tools in appraising the quality of outcome measure instruments are emphasized. What are the potential or actual clinical implications of this work? The COSMIN tools offer a step-by-step, standardized approach to appraise various measurement properties in outcome instruments. Due to existing limitations of the COSMIN tools, appraisal should provide clear and specific recommendations so users of outcome measures (e.g., SLTs, researchers) can identify the appropriate uses of each instrument.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    A remarkable lack of detailed knowledge on pain areas in psoriatic arthritis (PsA) is present, and their clinical relevance is quite unknown. The main aim of the study was to explore pain areas in PsA, comparing them with those involved in patients with fibromyalgia (FM). In addition, a secondary aim was to investigate any possible association between pain areas and outcome measures in PsA.
    This was a case-control study on patients with PsA satisfying Classification Criteria for Psoriatic Arthritis criteria and patients with FM. In all patients with PsA and FM, a body chart filled in by the patient reporting pain areas in 80 body locations was performed. The Widespread Pain Index (WPI) was performed in all patients with PsA and FM. In all patients with PsA, an assessment of disease activity, treatment target, function, and impact of disease was carried out.
    Fifty patients with PsA and 50 FM controls were evaluated. A significantly higher number of pain areas in the body chart and higher WPI scores were found in patients with FM when compared to patients with PsA. In PsA, the number of areas reported in the body chart significantly correlated with the Disease Activity Index for PsA, Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index, and PsA Impact of Disease. Patients who showed a significantly high number of extraarticular pain areas involved were those who were not in remission/minimal disease activity, or who did not have a greater impact of disease or reduced function.
    The main results showed that widespread and extraarticular pain was present in patients with PsA, showing that this nonarticular pain had an impact on important disease domains. The present study could contribute to an important aspect of this challenging and multifaceted disease-namely, the assessment of widespread pain.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    背景:面肩肱型肌营养不良(FSHD)是一种斑块状且缓慢进展的骨骼肌疾病。患者肌肉的MRI短tau倒置恢复(STIR)序列通常显示出高强度增加,这被认为与炎症有关。这得到STIR阳性肌肉活检组织中炎症变化的支持。我们假设STIR阳性会随着靶向免疫抑制治疗而正常化。
    方法:45岁男性FSHD1型接受12周免疫抑制治疗,他克莫司和泼尼松。将他克莫司治疗至>5ng/mL的目标血清谷,并且每月逐渐减少泼尼松。定量力量考试,功能结果衡量标准,和肌肉MRI在基线时进行,第6周和第12周。患者报告主观恶化,反映在定量强度检查中。MRISTIR信号从总肌肉的0.02略微增加到0.03;而T1脂肪分数稳定。功能结果测量也是稳定的。
    结论:在其他情况下,对屈光性自身免疫性肌病的免疫抑制治疗已被证明可以逆转STIR信号的高强度,然而,该治疗并未逆转FSHD患者的STIR信号.事实上,STIR信号在整个治疗期间略有增加。这是首次使用MRISTIR和T1脂肪分数跟踪FSHD治疗效果的研究。我们发现STIR可能不是抑制FSHD炎症的动态标志物。
    BACKGROUND: Facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD) is a patchy and slowly progressive disease of skeletal muscle. MRI short tau inversion recovery (STIR) sequences of patient muscles often show increased hyperintensity that is hypothesized to be associated with inflammation. This is supported by the presence of inflammatory changes on biopsies of STIR-positive muscles. We hypothesized that the STIR positivity would normalize with targeted immunosuppressive therapy.
    METHODS: 45-year-old male with FSHD type 1 was treated with 12 weeks of immunosuppressive therapy, tacrolimus and prednisone. Tacrolimus was treated to a goal serum trough of > 5 ng/mL and prednisone was tapered every month. Quantitative strength exam, functional outcome measures, and muscle MRI were performed at baseline, week 6, and week 12. The patient reported subjective worsening as reflected in quantitative strength exam. The MRI STIR signal was slightly increased from 0.02 to 0.03 of total muscle; while the T1 fat fraction was stable. Functional outcome measures also were stable.
    CONCLUSIONS: Immunosuppressive therapy in refractive autoimmune myopathy in other contexts has been shown to reverse STIR signal hyperintensity, however this treatment did not reverse STIR signal in this patient with FSHD. In fact, STIR signal slightly increased throughout the treatment period. This is the first study of using MRI STIR and T1 fat fraction to follow treatment effect in FSHD. We find that STIR might not be a dynamic marker for suppressing inflammation in FSHD.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然质量计划已被证明可以提高提供商的合规性,很少有人证明患者结局有决定性的改善.我们假设在我们机构启动麻醉质量改进计划后,指标依从性会提高,术后并发症会减少。我们对计划实施前后六个月的所有成年住院患者进行了为期十二个月的麻醉的回顾性研究。主要结果是实施后的并发症发生率。次要结果包括并发症比例的变化和对质量指标的依从性。我们共研究了9620例成人住院病例,细分为实施前和实施后的组(4832vs4788。)在多元模型调整后,任何并发症的发生率(我们的主要结局)没有显著变化(32%~31%;校正P=0.410.)在个体并发症中,仅伤口感染(2.0%~1.5%;调整后P=0.020)显示出统计学上显著的下降.BP-02避免监测差距指标的依从性在统计学和临床上显着增加(81%至93%,P<0.001),两种神经肌肉阻滞指标(NMB-0176%至91%,P<0.001;NMB-0295%至97%,P=0.006),两个潮气量指标(PUL-0184%至93%,P<0.001;PUL-0230%至45%,P<0.001),和TEMP-02核心温度测量指标(88%至94%,P<0.001)。实施全面的质量反馈计划可改善指标依从性,但与术后并发症的变化无关。
    While quality programs have been shown to improve provider compliance, few have demonstrated conclusive improvements in patient outcomes. We hypothesized that there would be increased metric compliance and decreased postoperative complications after initiation of an anesthesiology quality improvement program at our institution. We performed a retrospective study of all adult inpatients having anesthesia for a twelve-month period that spanned six months before and after program implementation. The primary outcome was the rate of complications in the post-implementation period. Secondary outcomes included the change in proportion of complications and compliance with quality metrics. We studied a total of 9620 adult inpatient cases, subdivided into pre- and post-implementation groups (4832 vs 4788.) After multivariate model adjustment, the rate of any complication (our primary outcome) was not significantly changed (32% to 31%; adjusted P = 0.410.) Of the individual complications, only wound infection (2.0% to 1.5%; adjusted P = 0.020) showed a statistically significant decrease. Statistically and clinically significant increases in compliance were seen for the BP-02 Avoiding Monitoring Gaps metric (81% to 93%, P < 0.001), both neuromuscular blockade metrics (NMB-01 76% to 91%, P < 0.001; NMB-02 95% to 97%, P = 0.006), both tidal volume metrics (PUL-01 84% to 93%, P < 0.001; PUL-02 30% to 45%, P < 0.001), and the TEMP-02 Core Temperature Measurement metric (88% to 94%, P < 0.001). Implementation of a comprehensive quality feedback program improved metric compliance but was not associated with a change in postoperative complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号