OBJECTIVE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the clinical performance of HBRT-H14, a real-time PCR-based assay that separates human papillomavirus (HPV) 16 and HPV18 from 12 other high-risk (HR) HPV types, in population according to Chinese guideline.
METHODS: A total of 9829 eligible women aged 21-64 years from Henan, Shanxi, and Guangdong provinces were performed by HBRT-H14 testing and liquid-based cytology (LBC) screening at baseline and followed up for 3-year. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (absolute risk), and negative predictive value of LBC diagnosis and HPV testing were calculated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia grade 2 or worse (CIN2+) Lesions.
RESULTS: At baseline, 80 (0.81%) participants were diagnosed with CIN2+. HR-HPV with reflex LBC had a significantly higher sensitivity (78/80, 97.50% [95% CI, 91.34-99.31%] vs. 62/80, 77.50% [67.21-85.27%], McNemar\'s test p < 0.001), and a slightly lower specificity (8528/9749, 87.48% [86.80-88.12%] vs. 8900/9749, 91.29% [90.72-91.83%], McNemar\'s test p < 0.001) than LBC with reflex HR-HPV for CIN2+. 7832 (79.6%) participants completed 3-year follow-up and 172 (2.20%) participants were cumulatively diagnosed with CIN2+. Compared with LBC with reflex HR-HPV, HR-HPV with reflex LBC significantly increased the sensitivity (161/172, 93.60% [88.91-96.39%] vs. 87/172, 50.58% [43.18-57.96%], McNemar\'s test p < 0.001), but marginally decreased the specificity (6776/7660, 88.46% [87.72-89.16%] vs. 6933/7660, 90.51% [89.83-91.15], McNemar\'s test p < 0.001). In addition, the absolute 3-year risk of CIN2+ in HPV16/18-positive individuals was as high as 33% (80/238), whereas the risk in the HPV-negative population was only 0.16% (11/6787), much lower than those in the negative for intraepithelial lesion or malignancy population (1.21%, 85/7018). Moreover, similar results were found in women ≥30 years old.
CONCLUSIONS: The study has indicated that HBRT-14 has a reliable clinical performance for use in cervical screening. The validated HPV test would improve the quality of population screening.

UNASSIGNED: In an era of minimally invasive and rapid diagnostic technologies, fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNAC) is most useful when it comes to patients with lymphadenopathies especially of the cervical region. Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is an alternative processing method which is used for both gynecological and non-gynecological samples. Because of the remarkable advantages of LBC smears in gynecological samples, nowadays, many studies have been done to assess its utility in various other lesions. Hereby, with the help of this study, we would like to evaluate the efficiency of LBC smears in comparison to conventional FNAC smears conventional smears (CS) on lymph node aspirates.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study was done over a 1-year period in which 253 cases of lymph node aspirates were included in the study. The slides were prepared using standard conventional and LBC techniques and compared for adequacy, cellularity, cell architecture, necrosis, background debris, presence of cells in monolayer sheets, and nuclear/cytoplasmic details.
UNASSIGNED: Of the total 253 cases, 171 (67.6%) were and 67 (26.5%) were diagnosed as non-neoplastic and malignant, respectively. Although the LBC smears were useful in the diagnosis of malignant cases, they did pose some challenges especially in the non-neoplastic lymph node aspirates due to loss of the background necrosis. In addition, the cellular yield in LBC smears was low in comparison to CS.
UNASSIGNED: LBC smears from lymph node aspirates results in better diagnostic accuracy for malignant cases due to better cellular and nuclear details. However, for non-neoplastic etiology, it should not be considered better than CS as loss of the background necrosis and inflammation may result in an incorrect diagnosis.

Background Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has shown advantages over conventional smears (CS), but previous applications in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid have produced inconsistent results. This study compared LBC and CS for diagnosing lung cancer using BAL fluid. Methodology A prospective study was conducted on 92 patients suspected of having lung cancer. All patients underwent bronchoscopy and had a final diagnosis confirmed by histopathology of lesions tissue through biopsy. The study aimed to assess the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) of the two cytological methods, in a pair-wise fashion. In addition, the study evaluated the correlation of factors, such as the volume of fluid used in LBC and bronchoscopy lesion morphology, with the sensitivity of LBC. Results The study involved 78 participants who were diagnosed with lung cancer. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, and NPV of LBC were 25.7%, 100%, 100%, and 19.4%, respectively, whereas those of CS were 15.4%, 85.7%, 85.7%, and 15.4%, respectively. Although the sensitivity of LBC was higher than that of CS, the difference was not statistically significant (p=0.096, McNemar test). Furthermore, the median fluid volume performed during LBC in patients with positive results was significantly higher than in those with negative results (p=0.001, Mann-Whitney U test). Conclusions The application of LBC to BAL fluid has demonstrated similar and potentially superior diagnostic accuracy compared to CS in detecting lung cancer. It is recommended that further investigation be undertaken to examine the relationship between the volume of fluid utilized during the LBC process and its diagnostic accuracy to enhance its sensitivity.

Examining epithelial cells in the mouth cavity is simple and non-invasive with exfoliative cytology. Liquid-based cytology is an additional diagnostic technique that can improve the specificity and sensitivity of conventional cytology. The purpose of our study was to describe the consistency of normal oral mucosa samples obtained with three different tools: the Cytobrush®, dermatological curette, and OralCDx® for liquid-based cytology. Literature review was done, and reporting of the improvements in the field of investigation and diagnosis has been reported. The present communication aims toward comparing three different sampling instruments such as Cytobrush, curette, and OralCDx for liquid-based cytology of the oral mucosa.

Liquid-based cytology is highly useful in oral cytology. However, there are only few reports on the accuracy of this method. The current study aimed to compare oral liquid-based cytological and histological diagnoses and to evaluate items that should be considered in oral cytological diagnosis for oral squamous cell carcinoma.
We included 653 patients who underwent both oral cytological and histological examinations. Data on sex, specimen collection region, cytological and histological diagnoses, and histological images were reviewed.
The overall male-to-female ratio was 1:1.18. The tongue was the most common specimen collection region, followed by the gingiva and buccal mucosa. The most common cytological examination result was negative (66.8%), followed by doubtful (22.7%) and positive (10.3%). The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value of cytological diagnosis were 69%, 75%, 38%, and 92%, respectively. Approximately 8.3% of patients with a negative cytological diagnosis had a histological diagnosis of oral squamous cell carcinoma. Furthermore, 86.1% of histopathologic images of cytology-negative squamous cell carcinomas exhibited well-differentiated keratinocytes lacking atypia on the surface. The remaining patients developed recurrence, or they had low cell counts.
Liquid-based cytology is useful in screening oral cancer. However, a cytological diagnosis of superficial-differentiated oral squamous cell carcinoma is occasionally inconsistent with the histological diagnosis. Therefore, histological and cytological examinations should be performed if tumor-like lesions are suspected clinically.

High-risk human papilloma virus (hrHPV) DNA testing is more sensitive than cytology screening, achieving greater protection against cervical cancer. Controversy exists regarding the preferred screening method for women 25-30 years of age. At this age, infection with HPV is common and usually transient. Consequently, hrHPV screening in this age group is fraught with high false-positive screening results, leading to more colposcopies and unnecessary treatments with the potential for harm. In the present study, we aimed to compare the results of two screening methods in relation to high-grade cervical intraepithelial lesion detection rate in the young age group of 25-30 years.
Retrospective information on cervical cytology, hrHPV testing, colposcopy referrals and histologic results, from one screening round, were retrieved from the Maccabi HealthCare Health Maintenance Organization centralized database during the study period from March 1, 2017 to April 1, 2019 for 25- to 30-year-old women. Screening with hrHPV testing for types 16, 18 and 12 other hrHPV types was compared with the conventional PAP liquid-based cytology (LBC) test. Odds ratio (OR) of detection with 95% confidence interval (CI) was calculated for cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) grade 3 or higher (CIN 3+).
During the study period, 42 244 women 25-30 years old underwent cervical cancer screening; of them, 20 997 were screened with LBC between March 1, 2017 and March 1, 2018 and compared with 21 247 who were screened with hrHPV between April 1, 2018 and April 1, 2019. Testing for hrHPV resulted in a higher colposcopy referral rate compared with primary LBC screening: 9.8% vs 7.8%, respectively; (OR 1.28; 95% CI 1.2-1.37; p < 0.001). Screening with hrHPV led to significantly higher detection of CIN 3+ lesions (OR 1.4; 95% CI 1.2-1.6; p < 0.001) compared with LBC. HPV infections with non-16/18 hrHPV (other hrHPV) were the most prevalent (84.8%).
In women 25-30 years old, primary hrHPV screening was associated with a higher detection rate of CIN 3+ compared with cytology screening and should be considered for primary screening in this age group.

UNASSIGNED: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) has been widely used since 2000. Next-Generation Sequencing (NGS) analysis of residual specimens in LBC fixative may also be performed for pancreatic cancer in the near future. We examined cell morphology, antigenicity and nucleic acids in pancreatic cancer cells at different fixation times using two types of LBC fixatives.
UNASSIGNED: PANC-1 cells were fixed in 1 ml CytoRich Red (CR), CytoRich Blue (CB), 95% ethanol (95% AL) or 10% neutral buffered formalin (10% NBF) and evaluated for cell area, antigenicity and nucleic acids with fixation times of 1 hour and 1, 3, 9, and 14 days. Antigenicity was evaluated by immunocytochemical staining for p53 and CK20, and nucleic acid fragmentation was assessed by real-time PCR.
UNASSIGNED: There was no difference in total cell area between 1 hour and 14 day fixation times for the CR group, but the CB group showed cell contraction with 9 days fixation. In immunocytochemical staining, the CR group showed high p53 and CK20 positivity even after 14 days fixation. The CB group had a lower p53 positive rate than the CR group from 1 hour fixation. For nucleic acid fragmentation, Ct values for the CR group increased with fixation time. The CB group had consistently low Ct values.
UNASSIGNED: Different LBC fixatives and fixation time can have varying effects on cell morphology, antigenicity and nucleic acids in pancreatic cancer cells. Therefore, fixative type and fixation time should be considered for molecular testing on residual samples in LBC fixatives.

In addition to liquid-based cytology (LBC) and HR HPV testing, p16/ki-67 dual-staining is another method for cervical cancer screening. The combination of any two methods can improve the accuracy of screening, but some cervical lesions are still missed or misdiagnosed. In this retrospective study, the significance of LBC, HR HPV testing and especially p16/ki-67 dual-staining in cervical lesion screening was evaluated with reference to histological diagnosis. At the same time, we tried to explore the value of p16/ki-67 dual-staining combined with LBC and HR HPV testing (triple detection) in improving the diagnostic specificity of CIN2+ and reducing the missed diagnosis of CIN2+ lesions. We found that p16/ki-67 dual-staining was valuable in identifying cervical CIN2+ lesions and reducing the missed diagnosis of CIN2+ in HPV negative patients. More than 96% of CIN2+ patients were positive for two or three tests of triple detection. Whole positive triple detection can effectively predict high grade cervical lesions. In conclusion, the triple detection can distinguish almost all cervical CIN2+ lesions. Our data put forward and highlight the feasibility and significance of triple detection in cervical lesion screening.

To evaluate the clinical utility of p16/Ki67 dual-stain (DS) compared with cytology for detecting cervical intraepithelial lesion grade two or worse (CIN2+) in women with a transformation zone type 3 (TZ3).
Cross-sectional study.
Colposcopy clinics in Central Denmark Region.
Women aged 45 years or older referred for colposcopy because of an abnormal screening test.
All women had a cervical sample collected for cytology and DS testing and underwent large-loop excision of the transformation zone (LLETZ).
Sensitivity, specificity and negative (NPV) and positive (PPV) predictive values of DS for CIN2+ detection were compared to those of cytology.
Of 166 women eligible, 93 (56.0%) were included in the final analysis. Median age was 68 years (interquartile range [IQR] 63.4-70.5 years). Most women were postmenopausal (95.7%) and referred based on a positive human papillomavirus screening test (86.0%). Fifty-two women (55.9%) were DS-positive, 29 (55.8%) of whom had CIN2+ detected. Twenty-seven (29.0%) women had atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance or worse (ASC-US+), and CIN2+ was detected in 21 women (77.8%). DS had a higher sensitivity (96.7% versus 70.0% p = 0.021) and NPV (97.6% versus 86.4%, p = 0.018) compared with cytology for CIN2+ detection. In contrast, the specificity (63.5% versus 90.5% p < 0.001) and PPV (55.8% versus 77.8%, p = 0.001) were lower for DS compared with cytology.
Dual stain may be a valuable risk marker to guide clinical management of women with a TZ3. The superior NPV of DS suggests that a diagnostic excision may safely be avoided in DS-negative women.

OBJECTIVE: Liquid-based cytology (LBC) is routinely used in gynecology but is rarely applied in head and neck oncology though many suspicious lesions are easily accessible. While several studies have evaluated the potential use of LBC for early detection and molecular characterization of head and neck squamous cell carcinomas (HNSCCs), no study investigated its potential role in surgical management and therapy planning so far.
METHODS: Twenty-five patients with cT1-2 squamous cell carcinomas of the oral cavity and oropharynx were prospectively enrolled in this study and were randomized to two treatment arms: in the control arm, a diagnostic panendoscopy with incisional biopsy was followed by a second operation with transoral tumor resection ± neck dissection and tracheostomy. In the intervention arm, patients underwent LBC diagnostics and in case of a positive result received one single operation with panendoscopy and incisional biopsy for confirmation of LBC result by rapid section histology followed by transoral tumor resection ± neck dissection and tracheostomy in the same session.
RESULTS: Time between clinical diagnosis and definitive surgical treatment was significantly shorter in the intervention group compared with the control group (p < 0.0001). Additionally, time of hospitalization (p < 0.0001) and cumulative operation time (p = 0.062) were shorter in the intervention group. No significant differences in overall, progression-free, and disease-specific survival were observed.
CONCLUSIONS: Cytology-based cancer surgery is a promising therapeutic strategy that can potentially be considered for a well-defined group of early-stage HNSCC patients and help to avoid repetitive general anesthesia, shorten the diagnosis-to-treatment interval and spare operation as well as hospitalization time.