lifestyle intervention

生活方式干预
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在这项试点研究中,作者调查了数字生活方式干预的初步有效性,actensio(mementorDEGmbH),治疗动脉高血压。患有动脉高血压的成年人以1:1的比例随机分配到干预组(actensio标准护理)或对照组(等待名单标准护理)。在基线(t0)和随机化后3个月(t1)评估主要和次要终点。主要终点是平均收缩压,在家测量1周。次要终点包括患者参与(使用“患者激活测量”;PAM-13测量),平均舒张压,和心率。使用ANCOVA模型分析所有终点,遵循意向治疗方法,同时调整基线值。使用多个插补模型估计缺失数据。总共N=102名参与者(f=59,年龄=52.94±9.01)被随机分为干预组(IG;N=52)或对照组(CG;N=50),其中N=80完成了血压日记,和N=81的PAM-13在t1。组间比较显示,干预组(M=137.37±10.13)和对照组(M=142.35±11.23)之间收缩压的平均组间差异为-5.06mmHg(95%CI=-8.71至-1.41,p=.013)。患者参与的平均组差异为3.35分,具有统计学意义的趋势(95%CI=-018至6.89,p=.064),有利于干预组(MIG=79.38±9.44vs.MCG=75.45±10.62)。舒张压(-1.78mmHg;95%CI=-4.50至0.95,p=.402)和心率(-0.684;95%CI=-3.73至2.36,p=0.683)没有组间差异。本试点研究的结果证实了数字生活方式干预的初步有效性,actensio,降低高血压患者的高血压。
    In this pilot study, the authors investigated the preliminary effectiveness of the digital lifestyle intervention, actensio (mementor DE GmbH), in treating arterial hypertension. Adults with arterial hypertension were randomly assigned to an intervention group (actensio + standard care) or a control group (waiting list + standard care) in a 1:1 ratio. Primary and secondary endpoints were assessed at baseline (t0) and 3 months post-randomization (t1). The primary endpoint was average systolic blood pressure, measured at home for 1 week. Secondary endpoints included patient engagement (measured using the \"patient activation measure\"; PAM-13), average diastolic blood pressure, and heart rate. All endpoints were analyzed using ANCOVA models, following an intention-to-treat approach, while adjusting for baseline values. Missing data were estimated using multiple imputation models. A total of N = 102 participants (f = 59, age = 52.94 ± 9.01) were randomized to either the intervention (IG; N = 52) or the control group (CG; N = 50), of which N = 80 completed the blood pressure diary, and N = 81 the PAM-13 at t1. Between-group comparisons showed an average group difference in systolic blood pressure of -5.06 mm Hg (95% CI = -8.71 to -1.41, p = .013) between the intervention group (M = 137.37 ± 10.13) and the control group (M = 142.35 ± 11.23). Average group difference for patient engagement was 3.35 points with a trend towards statistical significance (95% CI = -018 to 6.89, p = .064), favoring the intervention group (MIG = 79.38 ± 9.44 vs. MCG = 75.45 ± 10.62). There were no group differences in diastolic blood pressure (-1.78 mm Hg; 95% CI = -4.50 to 0.95, p = .402) and heart rate (-0.684; 95% CI = -3.73 to 2.36, p = 0.683). The results of the present pilot study confirm the preliminary effectiveness of the digital lifestyle intervention, actensio, in reducing high blood pressure in patients with hypertension.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:生活方式干预是代谢功能障碍相关脂肪性肝炎(MASH)治疗的主要手段,肝纤维化是MASH预测不良临床结局的关键后果。安慰剂反应在MASH临床试验的结果中起着关键作用。具有人工智能分析的二次谐波发生/双光子激发荧光(SHG/TPEF)显微镜可以在称为qFibrosis的连续尺度上提供纤维化特征的自动定量评估。在这项探索性研究中,我们使用这种方法来深入了解生活方式干预引起的MASH纤维化变化的影响.
    方法:我们检查了接受常规生活方式干预(RLI)(n=35)或强化生活方式干预(SLI)(n=17)的MASH个体配对肝活检(基线和干预结束)的未染色切片。我们量化了门静脉纤维化的肝纤维化,门户,过渡,周围中心,和中央静脉区域。
    结果:在RLI和SLI组中,约20%(7/35)和65%(11/17)的患者出现纤维化消退,分别。每次生活方式干预后,肝纤维化趋于无变化或消退,这种现象在SLI组中更为突出。SLI诱导的肝纤维化消退集中在门静脉周围区域。
    结论:使用数字病理学,我们可以用SLI检测到更明显的纤维化消退,主要在门户附近地区。随着门静脉周围区域纤维化面积的变化,我们可以在MASH临床试验中区分安慰剂组的RLI和SLI患者.数字病理学为生活方式引起的纤维化消退和安慰剂反应提供了新的见解,常规组织学分期无法捕获。
    OBJECTIVE: Lifestyle intervention is the mainstay of therapy for metabolic dysfunction-associated steatohepatitis (MASH), and liver fibrosis is a key consequence of MASH that predicts adverse clinical outcomes. The placebo response plays a pivotal role in the outcome of MASH clinical trials. Second harmonic generation/two-photon excitation fluorescence (SHG/TPEF) microscopy with artificial intelligence analyses can provide an automated quantitative assessment of fibrosis features on a continuous scale called qFibrosis. In this exploratory study, we used this approach to gain insight into the effect of lifestyle intervention-induced fibrosis changes in MASH.
    METHODS: We examined unstained sections from paired liver biopsies (baseline and end-of-intervention) from MASH individuals who had received either routine lifestyle intervention (RLI) (n = 35) or strengthened lifestyle intervention (SLI) (n = 17). We quantified liver fibrosis with qFibrosis in the portal tract, periportal, transitional, pericentral, and central vein regions.
    RESULTS: About 20% (7/35) and 65% (11/17) of patients had fibrosis regression in the RLI and SLI groups, respectively. Liver fibrosis tended towards no change or regression after each lifestyle intervention, and this phenomenon was more prominent in the SLI group. SLI-induced liver fibrosis regression was concentrated in the periportal region.
    CONCLUSIONS: Using digital pathology, we could detect a more pronounced fibrosis regression with SLI, mainly in the periportal region. With changes in fibrosis area in the periportal region, we could differentiate RLI and SLI patients in the placebo group in the MASH clinical trial. Digital pathology provides new insight into lifestyle-induced fibrosis regression and placebo responses, which is not captured by conventional histological staging.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:已提出个性化营养(PN)作为一种策略,以提高饮食建议的有效性并最终改善健康状况。
    目的:我们旨在评估在电子商务工具中加入基于组学的PN是否能改善普通人群的饮食行为和代谢状况。
    方法:21周并行,单盲,随机干预包括193名成年人,按照地中海饮食建议分配到对照组(n=57,完成者=36),PN(n=70,完成者=45),或个性化计划(PP,n=68,完成者=53)将行为改变计划与PN建议集成在一起。干预使用代谢组学,蛋白质组学,和遗传数据,以帮助参与者在模拟的电子商务零售商门户中创建个性化的购物清单。主要结果是地中海饮食依从性筛选器(MEDAS)评分;次要结果包括生物特征和代谢标记以及饮食习惯。
    结果:根据脂质生物标志物对志愿者进行了评分系统分类,碳水化合物代谢,炎症,氧化应激,和微生物群,并在PN和PP组中提供相应的饮食建议。干预措施显著提高了所有志愿者的MEDAS评分(对照组-3分;95%置信区间[CI]:2.2,3.8;PN-2.7分;95%CI:2.0,3.3;和PP-2.8分;95%CI:2.1,3.4;q<0.001)。经过多重比较调整后,PN组和对照组之间的饮食习惯或健康参数没有显着差异。然而,个性化建议显着(错误发现率<0.05),并选择性地增强了用碳水化合物代谢生物标志物计算的得分(β:-0.37;95%CI:-0.56,-0.18),氧化应激(β:-0.37;95%CI:-0.60,-0.15),微生物群(β:-0.38;95%CI:-0.63,-0.15),与对照饮食相比,炎症(β:-0.78;95%CI:-1.24,-0.31)。
    结论:与一般建议相比,在类似电子商务的工具中整合个性化策略并没有增强对地中海饮食的依从性或改善健康指标。该方法取得了良好的结果,并保证了更多的研究进一步促进其在PN中的应用。该试验在clinicaltrials.gov注册为NCT04641559(https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04641559?cond=NCT04641559&rank=1)。
    BACKGROUND: Personalized nutrition (PN) has been proposed as a strategy to increase the effectiveness of dietary recommendations and ultimately improve health status.
    OBJECTIVE: We aimed to assess whether including omics-based PN in an e-commerce tool improves dietary behavior and metabolic profile in general population.
    METHODS: A 21-wk parallel, single-blinded, randomized intervention involved 193 adults assigned to a control group following Mediterranean diet recommendations (n = 57, completers = 36), PN (n = 70, completers = 45), or personalized plan (PP, n = 68, completers = 53) integrating a behavioral change program with PN recommendations. The intervention used metabolomics, proteomics, and genetic data to assist participants in creating personalized shopping lists in a simulated e-commerce retailer portal. The primary outcome was the Mediterranean diet adherence screener (MEDAS) score; secondary outcomes included biometric and metabolic markers and dietary habits.
    RESULTS: Volunteers were categorized with a scoring system based on biomarkers of lipid, carbohydrate metabolism, inflammation, oxidative stress, and microbiota, and dietary recommendations delivered accordingly in the PN and PP groups. The intervention significantly increased MEDAS scores in all volunteers (control-3 points; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 2.2, 3.8; PN-2.7 points; 95% CI: 2.0, 3.3; and PP-2.8 points; 95% CI: 2.1, 3.4; q < 0.001). No significant differences were observed in dietary habits or health parameters between PN and control groups after adjustment for multiple comparisons. Nevertheless, personalized recommendations significantly (false discovery rate < 0.05) and selectively enhanced the scores calculated with biomarkers of carbohydrate metabolism (β: -0.37; 95% CI: -0.56, -0.18), oxidative stress (β: -0.37; 95% CI: -0.60, -0.15), microbiota (β: -0.38; 95% CI: -0.63, -0.15), and inflammation (β: -0.78; 95% CI: -1.24, -0.31) compared with control diet.
    CONCLUSIONS: Integration of personalized strategies within an e-commerce-like tool did not enhance adherence to Mediterranean diet or improved health markers compared with general recommendations. The metabotyping approach showed promising results and more research is guaranteed to further promote its application in PN. This trial was registered at clinicaltrials.gov as NCT04641559 (https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT04641559?cond=NCT04641559&rank=1).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:非酒精性脂肪性肝病(NAFLD)是一种全球性的健康流行病。生活方式干预被推荐为NAFLD的主要治疗方法。然而,最优方法尚不清楚。这项研究旨在评估强化生活方式干预(ILI)的综合方法的效果,以加强对热量限制饮食(CRD)的控制。锻炼,和个性化营养咨询对中国超重和肥胖NAFLD患者肝脏脂肪变性和肝外代谢状态的影响。
    方法:本研究是一项多中心随机对照试验(RCT),在中国7家医院进行。它涉及226名体重指数(BMI)高于25的参与者。这些参与者被随机分为两组:ILI组,接着是低碳水化合物,高蛋白CRD结合运动和营养师的强化咨询,和一个对照组,坚持平衡的CRD以及锻炼和标准咨询。研究的主要测量是从研究开始到第12周的脂肪衰减参数(FAP)的变化,在每个协议集内进行分析。次要指标包括BMI的变化,肝脏硬度测量(LSM),和各种代谢指标的改善。此外,FAP的预定亚组分析是根据性别等变量进行的,年龄,BMI,种族,高脂血症,和高血压。
    结果:共有167名参与者完成了整个研究。与对照组相比,ILI参与者实现了FAP的显著降低(LS均值差异,16.07[95%CI:8.90-23.25]dB/m)和BMI(LS均值差,1.46[95%CI:1.09-1.82]kg/m2),但不在LSM改善中(LS平均差,0.20[95%CI:-0.19-0.59]kPa)。ILI还显著改善了其他次要结局(包括ALT,AST,GGT,身体脂肪量,肌肉质量和骨骼肌质量,甘油三酯,空腹血糖,空腹胰岛素,HbA1c,HOMA-IR,HOMA-β,血压,和高半胱氨酸)。进一步的亚组分析表明,ILI,而不是控制干预,导致更显著的FAP降低,尤其是并发高血压患者(p<0.001)。
    结论:在此RCT中,一项为期12周的强化生活方式干预计划可显著改善超重和肥胖的中国非酒精性脂肪肝患者的肝脏脂肪变性和其他代谢指标.需要进一步的研究来确认这种方法的长期优势和实用性。
    背景:该临床试验于2019年6月在ClinicalTrials.gov(注册号:NCT03972631)上注册。
    BACKGROUND: Nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a globally increasing health epidemic. Lifestyle intervention is recommended as the main therapy for NAFLD. However, the optimal approach is still unclear. This study aimed to evaluate the effects of a comprehensive approach of intensive lifestyle intervention (ILI) concerning enhanced control of calorie-restricted diet (CRD), exercise, and personalized nutrition counseling on liver steatosis and extrahepatic metabolic status in Chinese overweight and obese patients with NAFLD.
    METHODS: This study was a multicenter randomized controlled trial (RCT) conducted across seven hospitals in China. It involved 226 participants with a body mass index (BMI) above 25. These participants were randomly assigned to two groups: the ILI group, which followed a low carbohydrate, high protein CRD combined with exercise and intensive counseling from a dietitian, and a control group, which adhered to a balanced CRD along with exercise and standard counseling. The main measure of the study was the change in the fat attenuation parameter (FAP) from the start of the study to week 12, analyzed within the per-protocol set. Secondary measures included changes in BMI, liver stiffness measurement (LSM), and the improvement of various metabolic indexes. Additionally, predetermined subgroup analyses of the FAP were conducted based on variables like gender, age, BMI, ethnicity, hyperlipidemia, and hypertension.
    RESULTS: A total of 167 participants completed the whole study. Compared to the control group, ILI participants achieved a significant reduction in FAP (LS mean difference, 16.07 [95% CI: 8.90-23.25] dB/m) and BMI (LS mean difference, 1.46 [95% CI: 1.09-1.82] kg/m2) but not in LSM improvement (LS mean difference, 0.20 [95% CI: -0.19-0.59] kPa). The ILI also substantially improved other secondary outcomes (including ALT, AST, GGT, body fat mass, muscle mass and skeletal muscle mass, triglyceride, fasting blood glucose, fasting insulin, HbA1c, HOMA-IR, HOMA-β, blood pressure, and homocysteine). Further subgroup analyses showed that ILI, rather than control intervention, led to more significant FAP reduction, especially in patients with concurrent hypertension (p < 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: In this RCT, a 12-week intensive lifestyle intervention program led to significant improvements in liver steatosis and other metabolic indicators in overweight and obese Chinese patients suffering from nonalcoholic fatty liver disease. Further research is required to confirm the long-term advantages and practicality of this approach.
    BACKGROUND: This clinical trial was registered on ClinicalTrials.gov (registration number: NCT03972631) in June 2019.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:循环乙醇胺酶原[PE(P)]水平降低,在各种心脏代谢条件下,一直报道磷脂酰乙醇胺(PE)的同时增加。在这里我们设计了,aplasmaphenscore(Plsscore),反映了一个代谢信号,包括PE(P)和PE的水平,并捕获循环中的自然变异,以及与疾病相关的代谢扰动,饮食,和生活方式。
    方法:我们利用,来自澳大利亚肥胖症的血浆脂质,糖尿病和生活方式研究(AusDiab;n=10,339,55%女性),全国队列,设计Pls评分并在Busselton健康研究中验证(BHS;n=4,492,56%女性,血清脂凝素)和一项安慰剂对照交叉试验,其中包括补充鲨鱼肝油(SLO)(n=10,100%男性)。我们检查了Pls评分与心脏代谢危险因素的关联,2型糖尿病(T2DM),心血管疾病和全因死亡率(超过17岁)。
    结果:在模型中,根据年龄调整,性别和BMI,相对于Q1,Pls评分(Q5)前五分之一的个体的OR为0.31(95%CI0.21-0.43),普遍的T2DM为0.39(95%CI0.25-0.61)和0.42(95%CI0.30-0.57),分别为2型糖尿病和心血管疾病,死亡率风险降低34%(HR=0.66;95%CI0.56-0.78)。饮食和生活习惯与Pls评分之间存在显着关联,并且通过SLO的饮食补充来验证这些关联,从而导致Pls评分的显着变化。
    结论:Pls评分作为捕获循环疟原虫自然变异的量度,不仅与心脏代谢风险和全因死亡率呈负相关,而且与饮食和生活方式相关.我们的结果支持Pls评分作为代谢健康及其对饮食干预反应的生物标志物的潜在效用。有必要进行进一步的研究,以探索潜在的机制并优化Pls评分在临床和人群环境中的实际实施。
    背景:国家卫生与医学研究委员会(NHMRC资助233200),澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究委员会(项目拨款APP1101320),西澳大利亚州健康促进基金会,澳大利亚国家卫生和医学研究委员会高级研究奖学金(#1042095)。
    BACKGROUND: Decreased levels of circulating ethanolamine plasmalogens [PE(P)], and a concurrent increase in phosphatidylethanolamine (PE) are consistently reported in various cardiometabolic conditions. Here we devised, a plasmalogen score (Pls Score) that mirrors a metabolic signal that encompasses the levels of PE(P) and PE and captures the natural variation in circulating plasmalogens and perturbations in their metabolism associated with disease, diet, and lifestyle.
    METHODS: We utilised, plasma lipidomes from the Australian Obesity, Diabetes and Lifestyle study (AusDiab; n = 10,339, 55% women) a nationwide cohort, to devise the Pls Score and validated this in the Busselton Health Study (BHS; n = 4,492, 56% women, serum lipidome) and in a placebo-controlled crossover trial involving Shark Liver Oil (SLO) supplementation (n = 10, 100% men). We examined the association of the Pls Score with cardiometabolic risk factors, type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality (over 17 years).
    RESULTS: In a model, adjusted for age, sex and BMI, individuals in the top quintile of the Pls Score (Q5) relative to Q1 had an OR of 0.31 (95% CI 0.21-0.43), 0.39 (95% CI 0.25-0.61) and 0.42 (95% CI 0.30-0.57) for prevalent T2DM, incident T2DM and prevalent cardiovascular disease respectively, and a 34% lower mortality risk (HR = 0.66; 95% CI 0.56-0.78). Significant associations between diet and lifestyle habits and Pls Score exist and these were validated through dietary supplementation of SLO that resulted in a marked change in the Pls Score.
    CONCLUSIONS: The Pls Score as a measure that captures the natural variation in circulating plasmalogens, was not only inversely related to cardiometabolic risk and all-cause mortality but also associate with diet and lifestyle. Our results support the potential utility of the Pls Score as a biomarker for metabolic health and its responsiveness to dietary interventions. Further research is warranted to explore the underlying mechanisms and optimise the practical implementation of the Pls Score in clinical and population settings.
    BACKGROUND: National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC grant 233200), National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia (Project grant APP1101320), Health Promotion Foundation of Western Australia, and National Health and Medical Research Council of Australia Senior Research Fellowship (#1042095).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    多领域干预可能会延迟或改善患有阿尔茨海默病的老年人的认知能力下降,特别是在记忆和抑制功能方面。然而,没有一项研究系统调查认知正常且主观认知功能减退(SCD)的老年人在接受多领域干预时脑功能的变化.
    我们旨在研究多领域干预是否可以改善SCD受试者中与记忆和抑制功能相关的神经心理功能和神经生理活动。
    八个集群,共有50个社区居住的SCD老年人是单盲的,随机分为干预组,接受了身体和认知训练,或对照组,照常接受治疗。对于神经心理学功能,计算6项认知测试的复合Z评分,并在两组间进行比较.对于神经生理活动,记忆功能的事件相关电位(ERP),包括错配负(MMN)和记忆P3,以及抑制功能的ERP,测量包括感觉门控(SG)和抑制-P3。在基线(T1)进行评估,干预结束(T2),和6个月后T2(T3)。
    对于神经心理功能,干预后未观察到效果.对于神经生理活动,与对照组相比,干预组观察到ΔT2-T1的MMN反应改善。多域干预对ΔT3-T1的记忆P3延迟产生持续影响。然而,干预组和对照组的SG和抑制-P3变化无显著差异。
    虽然对神经心理功能没有影响,多域干预可增强与记忆功能相关的特定神经生理活动。
    UNASSIGNED: Multidomain intervention may delay or ameliorate cognitive decline in older adults at risk of Alzheimer\'s disease, particularly in the memory and inhibitory functions. However, no study systematically investigates the changes of brain function in cognitively-normal elderly with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) when they receive multidomain intervention.
    UNASSIGNED: We aimed to examine whether a multidomain intervention could improve neuropsychological function and neurophysiological activities related to memory and inhibitory function in SCD subjects.
    UNASSIGNED: Eight clusters with a total of 50 community-dwelling SCD older adults were single-blind, randomized into intervention group, which received physical and cognitive training, or control group, which received treatment as usual. For the neuropsychological function, a composite Z score from six cognitive tests was calculated and compared between two groups. For the neurophysiological activities, event-related potentials (ERPs) of memory function, including mismatch negativity (MMN) and memory-P3, as well as ERPs of inhibitory function, including sensory gating (SG) and inhibition-P3, were measured. Assessments were performed at baseline (T1), end of the intervention (T2), and 6 months after T2 (T3).
    UNASSIGNED: For the neuropsychological function, the effect was not observed after the intervention. For the neurophysiological activities, improved MMN responses of ΔT2-T1 were observed in the intervention group versus the control group. The multidomain intervention produced a sustained effect on memory-P3 latencies of ΔT3-T1. However, there were no significant differences in changes of SG and inhibition-P3 between intervention and control groups.
    UNASSIGNED: While not impactful on neuropsychological function, multidomain intervention enhances specific neurophysiological activities associated with memory function.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:鉴于与精神疾病相关的身体健康差异,需要有针对性的生活方式干预,以降低心脏代谢疾病的风险.在年轻人的心理健康治疗中早期整合身体健康对于预防身体合并症至关重要,减少健康差距,管理药物副作用,改善整体健康结果。数字技术越来越多地用于促进健身,生活方式,和一般人群的身体健康。然而,在精神保健中使用这些干预措施来促进身体健康需要对影响其采用和实施的因素有细微差别的理解.
    目的:使用定性设计,我们探索了精神卫生保健专业人员(MHCP)对身体健康的数字技术的态度,目的是阐明机会,发展,和实施有效使用数字工具来促进精神卫生保健中更健康的生活方式。
    方法:使用反身主题分析对MHCP(N=13)进行了半结构化访谈,以探索他们在青年心理健康护理环境中使用数字健康促进身体健康的经验和观点。
    结果:报告了定性分析的三个总体主题:(1)动机会影响实施,(2)患者的准备和能力,(3)重新分配员工角色和职责。其中的次主题,和支持报价,被描述。
    结论:数字手段的使用为改善心理健康护理环境中的身体健康干预措施提供了许多机会。然而,鉴于许多MHCP对这些技术的经验有限,正式培训和额外支持可能会提高实施的可能性。患者症状等因素,安全,和获得技术,以及准备,可接受性,以及MHCP和患者使用数字工具的能力,也必须考虑。此外,必须仔细权衡数据集成的潜在好处与相关风险。
    BACKGROUND: Given the physical health disparities associated with mental illness, targeted lifestyle interventions are required to reduce the risk of cardiometabolic disease. Integrating physical health early in mental health treatment among young people is essential for preventing physical comorbidities, reducing health disparities, managing medication side effects, and improving overall health outcomes. Digital technology is increasingly used to promote fitness, lifestyle, and physical health among the general population. However, using these interventions to promote physical health within mental health care requires a nuanced understanding of the factors that affect their adoption and implementation.
    OBJECTIVE: Using a qualitative design, we explored the attitudes of mental health care professionals (MHCPs) toward digital technologies for physical health with the goal of illuminating the opportunities, development, and implementation of the effective use of digital tools for promoting healthier lifestyles in mental health care.
    METHODS: Semistructured interviews were conducted with MHCPs (N=13) using reflexive thematic analysis to explore their experiences and perspectives on using digital health to promote physical health in youth mental health care settings.
    RESULTS: Three overarching themes from the qualitative analysis are reported: (1) motivation will affect implementation, (2) patients\' readiness and capability, and (3) reallocation of staff roles and responsibilities. The subthemes within, and supporting quotes, are described.
    CONCLUSIONS: The use of digital means presents many opportunities for improving the provision of physical health interventions in mental health care settings. However, given the limited experience of many MHCPs with these technologies, formal training and additional support may improve the likelihood of implementation. Factors such as patient symptomatology, safety, and access to technology, as well as the readiness, acceptability, and capability of both MHCPs and patients to engage with digital tools, must also be considered. In addition, the potential benefits of data integration must be carefully weighed against the associated risks.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:芬兰预防认知障碍和残疾的老年干预研究(FINGER)显示,在有风险的老年人中,多领域生活方式干预的认知益处。LipiDiDiet试验强调了医疗食品在前驱阿尔茨海默病(AD)中的益处。然而,多模式干预结合生活方式和医疗食品治疗前驱AD的可行性和影响尚不清楚.
    方法:MIND-ADmini是一家为期6个月的跨国公司(瑞典,芬兰,德国,法国)概念验证随机对照试验(RCT)。参与者年龄为60-85岁,患有前驱AD(国际工作组-1标准),和血管/生活方式风险因素。平行组RCT有三组:多模式生活方式干预(营养指导,锻炼,认知训练,血管/代谢风险管理和社会刺激);多模式生活方式干预+医疗食品(FortasynConnect);和定期健康建议/护理(控制)。参与者以1:1:1(每个站点的计算机生成分配)进行随机化。结果评估者对随机化是盲目的。主要结果是多模式干预的可行性,按6个月招聘阶段的招聘率进行评估,每个干预组的总体依从性,和6个月的保留率。成功的依从性被预先指定为在≥2/4领域(生活方式干预)中参加≥40%的会话/领域,消耗≥60%的医疗食品(生活方式干预+医疗食品)。次要结果包括对每个干预组成部分的依从性/参与度以及对健康生活方式改变的总体依从性。使用健康生活方式的综合评分进行测量。认知评估作为探索性结果,例如临床痴呆评定量表。
    结果:在2017年9月至2019年5月期间,93名个体被随机分配(32个生活方式干预,31生活方式+医疗食品,和30个对照组)。总体招聘率为76.2%(前6个月为64.8%)。总体6个月保留率为91.4%(生活方式干预87.5%;生活方式+医疗食品90.3%;对照组96.7%)。生活方式干预组特定领域对认知训练的依从性为71.9%,78.1%的运动,68.8%的营养指导,和81.3%的血管风险管理;在生活方式+医疗食品组中,90.3%用于认知训练,87.1%的运动,80.7%营养指导,87.1%血管风险管理,和87.1%的医疗食品。与对照相比,两个干预组显示出健康的饮食改善(β生活方式×时间=1.11,P=0.038;β生活方式+医疗食物×时间=1.43,P=0.007);生活方式+医疗食物组也显示出血管风险降低(P=0.043)和认知功能下降较少(P<0.05,探索性分析).有5例严重不良事件(对照组:1例;生活方式干预:3例;生活方式+医疗食品:1)与干预无关。
    结论:多领域生活方式干预,单独或与医疗食品结合,在前驱AD中具有良好的可行性和依从性。长期认知和其他健康益处应在更大规模的试验中进一步研究。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT03249688。
    The Finnish Geriatric Intervention Study to Prevent Cognitive Impairment and Disability (FINGER) showed cognitive benefits from a multidomain lifestyle intervention in at-risk older people. The LipiDiDiet trial highlighted benefits of medical food in prodromal Alzheimer\'s disease (AD). However, the feasibility and impact of multimodal interventions combining lifestyle with medical food in prodromal AD is unclear.
    MIND-ADmini was a 6-month multinational (Sweden, Finland, Germany, France) proof-of-concept randomized controlled trial (RCT). Participants were 60-85 years old, had prodromal AD (International Working Group-1 criteria), and vascular/lifestyle risk factors. The parallel-group RCT had three arms: multimodal lifestyle intervention (nutritional guidance, exercise, cognitive training, vascular/metabolic risk management and social stimulation); multimodal lifestyle intervention + medical food (Fortasyn Connect); and regular health advice/care (control). Participants were randomized 1:1:1 (computer-generated allocation at each site). Outcome evaluators were blinded to randomization. Primary outcome was feasibility of the multimodal intervention, evaluated by recruitment rate during a 6-month recruitment phase, overall adherence in each intervention arm, and 6-month retention rate. Successful adherence was pre-specified as attending ≥ 40% of sessions/domain in ≥ 2/4 domains (lifestyle intervention), and consuming ≥ 60% of the medical food (lifestyle intervention + medical food). The secondary outcomes included adherence/participation to each intervention component and overall adherence to healthy lifestyle changes, measured using a composite score for healthy lifestyle. Cognitive assessments were included as exploratory outcomes, e.g. Clinical Dementia Rating scale.
    During September 2017-May 2019, 93 individuals were randomized (32 lifestyle intervention, 31 lifestyle + medical food, and 30 control group). Overall recruitment rate was 76.2% (64.8% during the first 6 months). Overall 6-month retention rate was 91.4% (lifestyle intervention 87.5%; lifestyle + medical food 90.3%; control 96.7%). Domain-specific adherence in the lifestyle intervention group was 71.9% to cognitive training, 78.1% exercise, 68.8% nutritional guidance, and 81.3% vascular risk management; and in the lifestyle + medical food group, 90.3% to cognitive training, 87.1% exercise, 80.7% nutritional guidance, 87.1% vascular risk management, and 87.1% medical food. Compared with control, both intervention arms showed healthy diet improvements (βLifestyle×Time = 1.11, P = 0.038; βLifestyle+medical food×Time = 1.43, P = 0.007); the lifestyle + medical food group also showed vascular risk reduction (P = 0.043) and less cognitive-functional decline (P < 0.05, exploratory analysis). There were 5 serious adverse events (control group: 1; lifestyle intervention: 3; lifestyle + medical food: 1) unrelated to interventions.
    The multidomain lifestyle intervention, alone or combined with medical food, had good feasibility and adherence in prodromal AD. Longer-term cognitive and other health benefits should be further investigated in a larger-scale trial.
    ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03249688.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    数字减肥干预为传统治疗提供了可行且具有成本效益的替代方案。然而,需要进一步的证据来确定两种方法的同等有效性。这项随机对照非劣效性试验旨在比较强化的当面减肥干预计划与Vitadio数字治疗的效果。100名肥胖并被诊断为2型糖尿病的患者,前驱糖尿病,纳入或胰岛素抵抗,并随机分配到两个治疗组之一.在6个月的时间里,对照组接受了五次专门治疗肥胖的医生的面对面咨询,营养师和/或营养护士,而干预组遵循基于多模式治疗方法的数字程序。评估并比较各组之间的体重减轻程度。此外,分析了数字干预组的身体成分和代谢参数的变化。研究结果表明,两种治疗方法对减轻体重的有效性相当。Vitadio的积极作用进一步通过干预组的身体成分和脂质代谢的有利变化以及改善的血糖控制得到证明。这些发现表明,Vitadio是帮助患者控制肥胖和预防糖尿病进展的有效工具。
    Digital weight loss interventions present a viable and cost-effective alternative to traditional therapy. However, further evidence is needed to establish the equal effectiveness of both approaches. This randomized controlled non-inferiority trial aimed to compare the effects of an intensive in-person weight loss intervention program with Vitadio digital therapy. One hundred patients with obesity and diagnosed with type 2 diabetes, prediabetes, or insulin resistance were enrolled and randomly assigned to one of the two treatment groups. Over a 6-month period, the control group received five in-person consultations with a physician who specialized in obesity treatment, a dietitian and/or a nutrition nurse, while the intervention group followed the digital program based on a multimodal therapeutic approach. The extent of weight loss was assessed and compared between the groups. Additionally, changes in body composition and metabolic parameters for the digital intervention group were analyzed. The study results demonstrated comparable effectiveness of both treatments for weight reduction. The positive effects of Vitadio were further evidenced by favorable changes in body composition and lipid metabolism and improved glycemic control in the intervention group. These findings suggest that Vitadio is an effective tool for assisting patients with managing obesity and preventing diabetes progression.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:在成年人中,富含蛋白质的饮食似乎对饱腹感有益,减肥,和体重管理;然而,调查儿童膳食蛋白质和体重发育的研究很少且不一致.这项非随机对照试验旨在研究生活方式干预期间高蛋白饮食对超重和肥胖儿童人体测量和代谢生物标志物的影响。
    方法:从两个多组分生活方式营地招募儿童(n:208)。一个营地被分配为干预组。在干预组中,早餐和两餐之间富含碳水化合物的食物被含蛋白质的食物代替,以将蛋白质的含量从每天约10-15能量百分比(E%)增加到每天约25E%。其他成分在组间相似。在基线时收集人体测量学和生化测量,10周(营后)和52周。
    结果:干预组BMI-SDS无明显改善(-0.07SD(-0.19;0.05),p=0.24)与对照组相比,但总的来说,高蛋白饮食对人体测量学和代谢生物标志物没有影响.总的来说,在营地10周导致更有利的身体组成[-6.50kg(p<0.00),-0.58BMI-SDS(p<0.00),和-5.92%体脂(p<0.00)],改善代谢健康,大多数变化维持在52周。
    结论:高蛋白饮食对身体成分和代谢健康没有显著影响;然而,这些生活方式营地是儿童肥胖的有效治疗策略。
    背景:clinicaltrials.gov,ID:NCT04522921。预注册2020年8月21日。
    OBJECTIVE: In adults, diets rich in protein seem beneficial in relation to satiety, weight loss, and weight management; however, studies investigating dietary protein and weight development in children are scarce and inconsistent. This nonrandomized controlled trial aimed to investigate the effect of a higher protein diet during lifestyle intervention on anthropometry and metabolic biomarkers in children with overweight and obesity.
    METHODS: Children (n:208) were recruited from two multicomponent lifestyle camps. One camp was assigned as the intervention group. In the intervention group, carbohydrates-rich foods at breakfast and two in-between-meals were replaced with protein-containing foods to increase the amount of protein from ~ 10-15 energy percent (E%) per day to ~ 25E% per day. Other components were similar between groups. Anthropometry and biochemical measurements were collected at baseline, 10 weeks (after camp) and 52 weeks.
    RESULTS: The intervention group had a non-significant improvement in BMI-SDS (- 0.07 SD (- 0.19; 0.05), p = 0.24) compared to the control group, but in general, there was no effect of a higher protein diet on anthropometry and metabolic biomarkers. Overall, 10 weeks at camp resulted in a more favorable body composition [- 6.50 kg (p < 0.00), - 0.58 BMI-SDS (p < 0.00), and - 5.92% body fat (p < 0.00)], and improved metabolic health, with most changes maintained at 52 weeks.
    CONCLUSIONS: A higher protein diet had no significant effect on body composition and metabolic health; however, these lifestyle camps are an efficiatious treatment strategy for childhood obesity.
    BACKGROUND: clinicaltrials.gov with ID: NCT04522921. Preregistered August 21st 2020.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号