Purpose: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP), ocular surface disease (OSD) parameters, and safety in patients with open-angle glaucoma (OAG)/ocular hypertension (OH) and concurrent OSD treated with preservative-free latanoprost 0.005% cationic emulsion (PF-latanoprost-E) or travoprost-Z 0.004% ophthalmical solution containing a soft preservative system. Methods: Patients with OAG/OH and OSD were randomized to treatment with PF-latanoprost-E or travoprost-Z nightly for 3 months. Outcomes included mean diurnal IOP reduction; OSD endpoints, including symptom improvement, tear break-up time (TBUT), and corneal fluorescein staining (CFS) score; and safety after 1 and 3 months. Results: A total of 105 patients were randomized, 51 to PF-latanoprost-E and 54 to travoprost-Z. IOP reductions (LS mean differences) at 3 months were numerically greater in the PF-latanoprost-E than in the travoprost-Z group at 8AM (7.2 versus 6.0 mmHg), 10AM (6.7 versus 5.9 mmHg), and 4PM (6.0 versus 5.4 mmHg). LS mean changes in IOP from baseline in both groups at 1 and 3 months, however, were comparable. Mean ± SD CFS scores on the Ora scale at month 3 showed significantly greater reductions in the PF-latanoprost-E than in the travoprost-Z group (-1.07 ± 1.863 versus -0.16 ± 2.553 P = 0.0461). The mean TBUT at month 3 showed similar improvements in both groups (1.1 versus 1.0 s, P > 0.05). OSD symptoms improved but did not differ significantly in the two groups. Overall safety was comparable in both groups. Conclusion: PF-latanoprost-E effectively and safely lowered IOP and improved OSD parameters in patients with OAG/OH. These findings provide evidence for the beneficial effects of this new formulation of latanoprost in glaucoma patients with OSD.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study is to assess the real-life efficacy and tolerance of a new preservative-free, surfactant-free latanoprost (PFSF-LAT) formulation.
METHODS: Retrospective, multicentre, non-comparative, observational study in patients with ocular hypertension or open angle glaucoma, naïve or non-naïve to previous intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering treatment, and treated for at least 3 months with the study eye drop. IOP for worse eye, ocular signs and symptoms, and concomitant use of artificial tears were collected at study drug initiation and at last visit under treatment. Reasons for discontinuing the study eye drop (if relevant) and investigators\' satisfaction were also assessed.
RESULTS: In the per protocol population (103 eyes; 63 naïve, 39 switched, 1 not classified because of missing data), IOP decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from 21.6 ± 5.0 mmHg at baseline to 16.1 ± 3.5 mmHg at the end of the study (mean reduction of - 5.5 ± 4.6 mmHg; - 25.5%). IOP in naïve patients was significantly improved, with a mean reduction of 7.1 mmHg (- 30.7%), which was within expected latanoprost IOP-lowering effect. Interestingly, in previously treated patients, switching to PFSF-LAT also allowed for a further 2.9 mmHg decrease in IOP (p < 0.001). The incidence of ocular side effects at study initiation was significantly (p < 0.001) reduced from 31.1% to 11.3% in the overall population, and from 65.0% to 7.5% in switched patients. This included conjunctival hyperaemia and superficial punctate keratitis (from 42.5% to 2.5% and from 37.5% to 2.5% in switched patients, respectively). According to investigators, tolerance and efficacy of the study eye drop were satisfactory or very satisfactory in 98.1% and 83.2% of patients, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: PFSF-LAT is an efficient treatment for patients with glaucoma with an improved tolerance profile. It can be considered as initial therapy in naïve patients or in patients with poor ocular tolerance to previous IOP-lowering eye drops.

BACKGROUND: Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), often associated with increased intraocular pressure (IOP), can lead to permanent damage of the optic nerve, concomitant visual field loss, and blindness. Latanoprost, a prostaglandin F2α analogue, reduces IOP and is used to treat glaucoma. In this clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of Latanoprost Polpharma, a generic preservative-free latanoprost 0.05 mg/ml eye drops solution, in lowering IOP when compared to the originator Xalatan® (latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution, Pfizer).
METHODS: This was a Phase III, multicentre, randomized, investigator-masked, cross-over, comparative, non-inferiority trial carried out in 5 sites in Hungary and Russia. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the non-inferiority of the test product when compared to the reference product with respect to the differences in the mean diurnal IOP on Day 1 (baseline) and Day 29. The secondary endpoints included efficacy, ocular tolerance, safety, and usability. We recruited adult patients (18-75 years) with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were randomised and received at least one dose of the test or reference product. A virtually identical reduction of the mean diurnal IOP of 7.04 ± 2.14 mmHg or 7.17 ± 2.11 mmHg was found after treatment with test or reference product, respectively (N = 44). In the intention to treat analysis, the reduction was 7.29 ± 2.53 mmHg (95% CI: 6.55-8.04) or 7.43 ± 2.78 mm Hg (95%CI: 6.61-8.24) after treatment with test or reference product, respectively (N = 47). There were no serious adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost Polpharma was shown to be non-inferior to Xalatan®. Both investigational products were equally well tolerated and safe. The data show a trend in favour of the test product with regards to the severity of hyperaemia and to the velocity of remission of ocular discomfort. Latanoprost Polpharma, being preservative-free, also avoids the cytotoxicity of benzalkonium chloride, the side effects of which may affect patient compliance and lower the quality of life.
BACKGROUND: The study had the ethical and regulatory approval from the National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition (OGYEI, OGYEI/41,779- 11/2018) and the Ethics Committee for Clinical Pharmacology (KFEB) of Hungary and from the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (MOH of Russia) prior to the beginning of the study (642/25.12.2018) (clinical trial identification number: 848,300,144/0103/1 - POP03; IND number/EudraCT number: 2018-001727-39).

UNASSIGNED: To compare the efficacy and safety of omidenepag isopropyl (OMDI) 0.002% with latanoprost 0.005% once daily in Asian subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG)/ocular hypertension (OHT).
UNASSIGNED: In this Phase III randomized, observer-masked, active-controlled, multinational trial (NCT02981446), subjects aged ≥18 years with OAG/OHT in both eyes and baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥22 mmHg and ≤34 mmHg were randomized 1:1 to OMDI or latanoprost. IOP was measured at 9AM, 1PM, and 5PM at baseline, 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Non-inferiority of OMDI to latanoprost was tested for primary and key secondary endpoints.
UNASSIGNED: Each group included 185 subjects. Mean diurnal IOP from baseline to month 3 was reduced 7.1 mmHg (28.8%) with OMDI and 7.8 mmHg (31.3%) with latanoprost, with the least-squares mean difference (OMDI minus latanoprost) being 0.6 mmHg (95% CI: 0.0, 1.2 mmHg; p = 0.0366), indicating non-inferiority. Mean IOP reductions at the nine timepoints were -5.8 to -7.3 mmHg (23.5-29.5%) for OMDI and -6.1 to -7.9 mmHg (24.3-31.7%) for latanoprost. Non-inferiority per FDA criteria was also met. Rates of all AEs, ocular AEs, and ocular AEs associated with treatment were 40.0%, 36.8%, and 23.2%, respectively, for OMDI and 29.7%, 21.1%, and 11.9%, respectively, for latanoprost. Conjunctival hyperemia rates were higher with OMDI than latanoprost (11.9% vs 5.4%). Most AEs were mild, with no serious ocular AEs.
UNASSIGNED: OMDI safely and effectively reduces IOP in Asian subjects with OAG/OHT, with mean diurnal IOP at Month 3 and per-timepoint IOP reductions non-inferior to those of latanoprost.
PEONY Study: Testing How Well and How Safely Omidenepag Isopropyl Eye Drops Treat People with Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Compared with Latanoprost. Who took part in the study? Three hundred and seventy participants average age of 57 years, from 34 centers across four Asian countries who had glaucoma or high pressure in both eyes were randomly divided into two groups. One group (185 people; 50%) was given OMDI, and the other group (185 people; 50%) latanoprost for 3 months. The intraocular pressure of both eyes was measured in all participants at three time points (9 AM, 1 PM, and 5 PM) after 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was the average of the daily eye pressure after 3 months of treatment. The safety of OMDI was also assessed. Study results. After 3 months of treatment, OMDI decreased the eye pressure by 29%. This was similar to latanoprost, which decreased the eye pressure by 31% over the same time period. OMDI was safe and well tolerated by those participants who received it. The most common side-effect in people receiving OMDI or latanoprost was conjunctival hyperemia (red eye) (experienced by 22 people receiving OMDI, and 10 people receiving latanoprost). Conclusions After 3 months of use, OMDI was found to safely reduce high eye pressure to a similar level as latanoprost in Asian people with glaucoma or high eye pressure.

BACKGROUND: Dry eye is a condition related to long-term topical eye therapy. We wish to evaluate the effectiveness and tolerability of preservative free prostaglandin drops versus benzalkonium chloride containing prostaglandin drops in the treatment of glaucoma.
METHODS: Patients undergoing prostaglandin monotherapy underwent a washout period of at least 1 month after which baseline measurements of dry eye severity were taken. Patients were randomised to receive either 0.0015% tafluprost drops or 0.005% latanoprost preserved with 0.02% benzalkonium chloride. Repeat measurements were taken after a 2-month interval.
RESULTS: Thirty-five patients completed randomised treatment. No significant difference between groups was found in objective and subjective measurements of dry eye severity. No significant difference was found in measurement of treatment effectiveness.
CONCLUSIONS: Preservative-free and benzalkonium chloride-containing drops were found to be equally effective in lowering IOP with no significant difference in either subjective or objective measurements of dry eye severity.

Purpose: To compare the efficacy of Brinzolamide-Brimonidine (BB) (1%+0.2%) with the gold standard Latanoprost-Timolol (LT) (0.005%+0.5%) in treating primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension (OHT). Methods: A 1-year prospective study, spanning from May 2022 to May 2023, conducted at a tertiary eye-care hospital. Participants, aged 40-60, with a baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) >21 mm Hg, requiring a >30% reduction, were enrolled. Group A (n = 100) received BB, and Group B (n = 100) received LT. Outcomes were assessed at 1 month (IOP difference from baseline), 3 and 6 months (mean diurnal variations). Results: The mean age at presentation was 55.5 ± 4.5 years in Group A and 54.7 ± 4.2 years in Group B. At 1 month, Group A exhibited a mean IOP of 18.7 mm Hg, while Group B had 17.6 mm Hg, with no statistically significant difference (P = 0.53). No significant diurnal variation was observed in either group (P = 0.07). Target pressure was achieved in 88% of patients in Group A and slightly higher at 92% in Group B. Moreover, no serious side effects were reported, and compliance was higher in Group B (98%) compared to Group A (96%). Conclusion: Although LT showed slightly better and sustained IOP reduction, the difference was not statistically significant. Both BB and LT demonstrated comparable outcomes for managing POAG and OHT.

OBJECTIVE: To compare intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of NCX 470, a nitric oxide (NO)-donating bimatoprost, to latanoprost in subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT).
METHODS: Prospective, phase 3, randomized, adaptive dose-selection, double-masked, parallel-group trial.
METHODS: 691 subjects with OAG or OHT and unmedicated IOP ≥26 mmHg at 8AM, ≥24 mmHg at 10AM, and ≥22 mmHg at 4PM in the study eye were randomized to NCX 470 0.065%, NCX 470 0.1%, or latanoprost 0.005%. An interim analysis was performed to select the final dose of NCX 470. We evaluated noninferiority of NCX 470 versus latanoprost, based on IOP reduction from baseline at 8AM and 4PM at 2 weeks, 6 weeks, and 3 months.
RESULTS: 661 subjects were analyzed; IOP was significantly reduced at all on-treatment time points, with reductions ranging from 8.0 to 9.7 mmHg (P < .0001 at each time point) in the NCX 470 0.1% group. Mean IOP reductions were greater with NCX 470 0.1% than latanoprost 0.005% at all 6 time points and significantly greater (P < .05) at 4 of the 6 time points. The most common adverse event was conjunctival/ocular hyperemia.
CONCLUSIONS: The NO-donating prostaglandin analogue NCX 470 0.1% was well-tolerated and lowered IOP more than latanoprost in subjects with OAG or OHT at all 6 time points. With a dual mechanism of action that enhances both uveoscleral and trabecular outflow, NCX 470 could become an important first-line therapy for IOP reduction in glaucoma.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether intraocular pressure (IOP) fluctuation is associated independently with the rate of visual field (VF) progression in the United Kingdom Glaucoma Treatment Study.
METHODS: Randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled multicenter trial.
METHODS: Participants with ≥5 VFs (213 placebo, 217 treatment).
METHODS: Associations between IOP metrics and VF progression rates (mean deviation [MD] and five fastest locations) were assessed with linear mixed models. Fluctuation variables were mean Pascal ocular pulse amplitude (OPA), standard deviation (SD) of diurnal Goldmann IOP (diurnal fluctuation), and SD of Goldmann IOP at all visits (long-term fluctuation). Fluctuation values were normalized for mean IOP to make them independent from the mean IOP. Correlated nonfluctuation IOP metrics (baseline, peak, mean, supine, and peak phasing IOP) were combined with principal component analysis, and principal component 1 (PC1) was included as a covariate. Interactions between covariates and time from baseline modeled the effect of the variables on VF rates. Analyses were conducted separately in the two treatment arms.
METHODS: Associations between IOP fluctuation metrics and rates of MD and the five fastest test locations.
RESULTS: In the placebo arm, only PC1 was associated significantly with the MD rate (estimate, -0.19 dB/year [standard error (SE), 0.04 dB/year]; P < 0.001), whereas normalized IOP fluctuation metrics were not. No variable was associated significantly with MD rates in the treatment arm. For the fastest five locations in the placebo group, PC1 (estimate, -0.58 dB/year [SE, 0.16 dB/year]; P < 0.001), central corneal thickness (estimate, 0.26 dB/year [SE, 0.10 dB/year] for 10 μm thicker; P = 0.01) and normalized OPA (estimate, -3.50 dB/year [SE, 1.04 dB/year]; P = 0.001) were associated with rates of progression; normalized diurnal and long-term IOP fluctuations were not. In the treatment group, only PC1 (estimate, -0.27 dB/year [SE, 0.12 dB/year]; P = 0.028) was associated with the rates of progression.
CONCLUSIONS: No evidence supports that either diurnal or long-term IOP fluctuation, as measured in clinical practice, are independent factors for glaucoma progression; other aspects of IOP, including mean IOP and peak IOP, may be more informative. Ocular pulse amplitude may be an independent factor for faster glaucoma progression.
BACKGROUND: Proprietary or commercial disclosure may be found in the Footnotes and Disclosures at the end of this article.

BACKGROUND: Several treatment modalities are available for the treatment of vitiligo due to the lack of a uniformly effective therapy. Topical latanoprost 0.005% is an effective topical treatment. Fractional CO2 laser alone or combined with platelet-rich plasma (PRP) has been proposed as effective adjunctive therapies.
OBJECTIVE: We aimed to compare the efficacy of topical latanoprost 0.005% (Ioprost®, Orchidia, Egypt) combined with either add-on fractional CO2 laser or fractional CO2 -PRP versus topical latanoprost monotherapy in the treatment of localized stable vitiligo.
METHODS: The study included 60 patients randomly assigned into three equal groups. Group A patients received topical latanoprost drops only. Group B patients received topical latanoprost drops and fractional CO2 laser sessions at 2-week interval for 3 months. Group C patients received topical latanoprost drops and fractional CO2 laser sessions combined with PRP at a 2-week interval for 3 months. The mean improvement score by the physician was calculated 4 months after the start of the study. Punch skin biopsies were obtained before treatment and 4 months from the beginning of the study and stained with H&E and HMB-45 antibody for evaluation of pigmentation.
RESULTS: Significant clinical improvement of vitiligo lesions with significant increase of re-pigmentation were reported in the three treated groups. Latanoprost in combination with fractional CO2 and PRP was associated with more significant therapeutic outcomes than either combined latanoprost and fractional CO2 or latanoprost alone.
CONCLUSIONS: Fractional CO2 laser-PRP enhances the therapeutic efficacy of latanoprost 0.005% in the treatment of localized stable vitiligo.

To compare the efficacy of morning and evening latanoprost/timolol fixed-combination (LTFC) dosing in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension.
In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 63 untreated Chinese patients with POAG and ocular hypertension were enrolled. All patients received LTFC and were randomized (1:1) to group 1, morning (8 AM) dosing, or group 2, evening (8 PM) dosing. Vehicle drops were used in the morning or evening, accordingly, to preserve masking. Patients were treated for 4 weeks. Outcomes included mean reduction of the 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) and IOP fluctuation from baseline after a 4-week treatment.
Fifty-six patients were included in the final analysis. In both groups, the posttreatment IOP values were significantly lower than those at baseline at each 24-hour measuring time point. A significant difference between the groups in IOP reduction from baseline was observed at the 9:30 AM time point (4.01 ± 2.62 vs. 2.42 ± 3.23 mm Hg, evening dosing versus morning dosing group; P = 0.048). Both groups showed decreased IOP fluctuation after treatment. However, the morning dosing group had a significantly greater decrease in diurnal IOP fluctuation than that of the evening dosing group (2.04 ± 2.32 mm Hg vs. 0.50 ± 1.70 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.012).
Both morning and evening LTFC dosing can effectively reduce 24-hour IOP and IOP fluctuation. Morning dosing is more likely to effectively control diurnal IOP fluctuations.
This multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial generates robust evidence on the optimal LTFC dosing regimen to help clinical decision-making in the treatment of raised IOP.