BACKGROUND: Primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG), often associated with increased intraocular pressure (IOP), can lead to permanent damage of the optic nerve, concomitant visual field loss, and blindness. Latanoprost, a prostaglandin F2α analogue, reduces IOP and is used to treat glaucoma. In this clinical trial, we evaluated the efficacy of Latanoprost Polpharma, a generic preservative-free latanoprost 0.05 mg/ml eye drops solution, in lowering IOP when compared to the originator Xalatan® (latanoprost 0.005% ophthalmic solution, Pfizer).
METHODS: This was a Phase III, multicentre, randomized, investigator-masked, cross-over, comparative, non-inferiority trial carried out in 5 sites in Hungary and Russia. The primary endpoint was to evaluate the non-inferiority of the test product when compared to the reference product with respect to the differences in the mean diurnal IOP on Day 1 (baseline) and Day 29. The secondary endpoints included efficacy, ocular tolerance, safety, and usability. We recruited adult patients (18-75 years) with open-angle glaucoma or ocular hypertension.
RESULTS: Forty-nine patients were randomised and received at least one dose of the test or reference product. A virtually identical reduction of the mean diurnal IOP of 7.04 ± 2.14 mmHg or 7.17 ± 2.11 mmHg was found after treatment with test or reference product, respectively (N = 44). In the intention to treat analysis, the reduction was 7.29 ± 2.53 mmHg (95% CI: 6.55-8.04) or 7.43 ± 2.78 mm Hg (95%CI: 6.61-8.24) after treatment with test or reference product, respectively (N = 47). There were no serious adverse events.
CONCLUSIONS: Latanoprost Polpharma was shown to be non-inferior to Xalatan®. Both investigational products were equally well tolerated and safe. The data show a trend in favour of the test product with regards to the severity of hyperaemia and to the velocity of remission of ocular discomfort. Latanoprost Polpharma, being preservative-free, also avoids the cytotoxicity of benzalkonium chloride, the side effects of which may affect patient compliance and lower the quality of life.
BACKGROUND: The study had the ethical and regulatory approval from the National Institute of Pharmacy and Nutrition (OGYEI, OGYEI/41,779- 11/2018) and the Ethics Committee for Clinical Pharmacology (KFEB) of Hungary and from the Ministry of Healthcare of the Russian Federation (MOH of Russia) prior to the beginning of the study (642/25.12.2018) (clinical trial identification number: 848,300,144/0103/1 - POP03; IND number/EudraCT number: 2018-001727-39).

UNASSIGNED: To compare the efficacy and safety of omidenepag isopropyl (OMDI) 0.002% with latanoprost 0.005% once daily in Asian subjects with open-angle glaucoma (OAG)/ocular hypertension (OHT).
UNASSIGNED: In this Phase III randomized, observer-masked, active-controlled, multinational trial (NCT02981446), subjects aged ≥18 years with OAG/OHT in both eyes and baseline intraocular pressure (IOP) ≥22 mmHg and ≤34 mmHg were randomized 1:1 to OMDI or latanoprost. IOP was measured at 9AM, 1PM, and 5PM at baseline, 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months. Adverse events (AEs) were recorded. Non-inferiority of OMDI to latanoprost was tested for primary and key secondary endpoints.
UNASSIGNED: Each group included 185 subjects. Mean diurnal IOP from baseline to month 3 was reduced 7.1 mmHg (28.8%) with OMDI and 7.8 mmHg (31.3%) with latanoprost, with the least-squares mean difference (OMDI minus latanoprost) being 0.6 mmHg (95% CI: 0.0, 1.2 mmHg; p = 0.0366), indicating non-inferiority. Mean IOP reductions at the nine timepoints were -5.8 to -7.3 mmHg (23.5-29.5%) for OMDI and -6.1 to -7.9 mmHg (24.3-31.7%) for latanoprost. Non-inferiority per FDA criteria was also met. Rates of all AEs, ocular AEs, and ocular AEs associated with treatment were 40.0%, 36.8%, and 23.2%, respectively, for OMDI and 29.7%, 21.1%, and 11.9%, respectively, for latanoprost. Conjunctival hyperemia rates were higher with OMDI than latanoprost (11.9% vs 5.4%). Most AEs were mild, with no serious ocular AEs.
UNASSIGNED: OMDI safely and effectively reduces IOP in Asian subjects with OAG/OHT, with mean diurnal IOP at Month 3 and per-timepoint IOP reductions non-inferior to those of latanoprost.
PEONY Study: Testing How Well and How Safely Omidenepag Isopropyl Eye Drops Treat People with Glaucoma or Ocular Hypertension Compared with Latanoprost. Who took part in the study? Three hundred and seventy participants average age of 57 years, from 34 centers across four Asian countries who had glaucoma or high pressure in both eyes were randomly divided into two groups. One group (185 people; 50%) was given OMDI, and the other group (185 people; 50%) latanoprost for 3 months. The intraocular pressure of both eyes was measured in all participants at three time points (9 AM, 1 PM, and 5 PM) after 1 week, 6 weeks, and 3 months of treatment. The primary endpoint was the average of the daily eye pressure after 3 months of treatment. The safety of OMDI was also assessed. Study results. After 3 months of treatment, OMDI decreased the eye pressure by 29%. This was similar to latanoprost, which decreased the eye pressure by 31% over the same time period. OMDI was safe and well tolerated by those participants who received it. The most common side-effect in people receiving OMDI or latanoprost was conjunctival hyperemia (red eye) (experienced by 22 people receiving OMDI, and 10 people receiving latanoprost). Conclusions After 3 months of use, OMDI was found to safely reduce high eye pressure to a similar level as latanoprost in Asian people with glaucoma or high eye pressure.

To compare the efficacy of morning and evening latanoprost/timolol fixed-combination (LTFC) dosing in patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and ocular hypertension.
In this double-blind, randomized clinical trial, 63 untreated Chinese patients with POAG and ocular hypertension were enrolled. All patients received LTFC and were randomized (1:1) to group 1, morning (8 AM) dosing, or group 2, evening (8 PM) dosing. Vehicle drops were used in the morning or evening, accordingly, to preserve masking. Patients were treated for 4 weeks. Outcomes included mean reduction of the 24-hour intraocular pressure (IOP) and IOP fluctuation from baseline after a 4-week treatment.
Fifty-six patients were included in the final analysis. In both groups, the posttreatment IOP values were significantly lower than those at baseline at each 24-hour measuring time point. A significant difference between the groups in IOP reduction from baseline was observed at the 9:30 AM time point (4.01 ± 2.62 vs. 2.42 ± 3.23 mm Hg, evening dosing versus morning dosing group; P = 0.048). Both groups showed decreased IOP fluctuation after treatment. However, the morning dosing group had a significantly greater decrease in diurnal IOP fluctuation than that of the evening dosing group (2.04 ± 2.32 mm Hg vs. 0.50 ± 1.70 mm Hg, respectively; P = 0.012).
Both morning and evening LTFC dosing can effectively reduce 24-hour IOP and IOP fluctuation. Morning dosing is more likely to effectively control diurnal IOP fluctuations.
This multicenter, double-blind, randomized clinical trial generates robust evidence on the optimal LTFC dosing regimen to help clinical decision-making in the treatment of raised IOP.

UNASSIGNED: To evaluate the ocular surface of patients treated with latanoprost (LT) 0.005% who switched to latanoprostene bunod (LBN) 0.024%.
UNASSIGNED: A prospective and nonrandomized clinical study of a case series was performed, including patients with chronic open-angle glaucoma who were on previous LT-only treatment and, after a washout period, switched to LBN, with a 3-month follow-up. The main parameter to be evaluated was the ocular surface disease index (OSDI) test. In addition, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), biomicroscopic aspect of the ocular surface, measuring tear breakup time, fluorescein staining (grading performed on Oxford scale) and Schirmer I test were evaluated.
UNASSIGNED: A total of 36 patients (72 eyes) were included, 21 women (58.3%) and 15 men (41.7%, with a mean age of 65.6 ± 10.9 years (37-86). The initial OSDI score was 17.8 ± 12.1 and improved to 11.1 ± 10.5 (p < 0.01). From the data evaluated at biomicroscopy, an improvement was observed in the Oxford scale from 0.6 ± 0.7 to 0.2 ± 0.8 (p: 0.01), but no statistically significant changes were observed in the break-up time (BUT) and Schirmer. BCVA remained stable, as did IOP, which was initially 13.4 ± 2.1 mm Hg and, after performing the LBN treatment change, went to 13.1 ± 1.7 mm Hg.
UNASSIGNED: After the change of treatment from LT 0.005% to LBN 0.024%, the patients had an improvement in the ocular surface, maintaining control of their IOP. The need to investigate possible beneficial mechanisms on the ocular surface in glaucoma patients treated with LBN, potentially related to nitric oxide, is raised.
UNASSIGNED: Patients treated with LT 0.005% who switched to LBN 0.024% had an improvement in ocular surface symptoms and signs, keeping IOP under control.Latanoprostene bunod (LBN) 0.024% may have beneficial effects on the ocular surface, which should be further studied.
UNASSIGNED: Zanutigh V, Galetto L, Valvecchia F, et al. Ocular Surface Evaluation after Switch from Latanoprost 0.005% to Latanoprostene Bunod 0.024%. J Curr Glaucoma Pract 2023;17(4):205-209.

The purpose of this study was to explore the effects of a PGF2α analog, latanoprost, and its preservative, benzalkonium chloride (BAK), on the cell viability and lipidomic expression of immortalized human meibomian gland epithelial cells (HMGECs).
Differentiated HMGECs were exposed to latanoprost (0.05 to 50 µg/ml), BAK (0.2 to 200 µg/ml), or combined latanoprost-BAK (0.05-0.2 to 50-200 µg/ml). EP- and FP-type receptors, the cognate receptors of PGE2 and PGF2α, were inhibited, thereby sparing and isolating the function of each receptor to one condition. Cell viability was assessed by ATP quantitation, and lipid extracts were analyzed by ESI-MSMSALL with a Triple TOF 5600 Mass Spectrometer (SCIEX, Framingham, MA) using SCIEX LipidView 1.3.
Latanoprost and BAK were found to be lethal to HMGECs at the highest concentrations (p < 0.001 for both). The cytotoxicity of latanoprost was mediated through FP- and EP-independent mechanisms. Both latanoprost and BAK significantly modulated the lipidomic expression of several cholesteryl esters (8% and 30%, respectively) and triacylglycerols (10% and 12%, respectively). The combined latanoprost-BAK agent appeared to be no more toxic and to only negligibly alter the lipid profile relative to its individual components.
The use of latanoprost and BAK in glaucoma may alter the viability of the meibomian glands and their lipid expression in vivo. Sublethal concentrations of BAK appear to modulate meibum lipid expression, particularly in relation to sterol biosynthesis. Non-preserved latanoprost had less cytotoxicity at lower doses and fewer lipidomic effects compared to BAK, further strengthening the argument in favor of BAK-free pharmaceutical preparations.

To investigate the therapeutic effects of eye drops, namely, timolol maleate, a β-adrenergic receptor antagonist, and latanoprost, a prostaglandin F2α analog, on retinal edema in a murine retinal vein occlusion (RVO) model.
An RVO model was established using laser-induced RVO in mice, which were administered timolol maleate and latanoprost eye drops several times after venous occlusion. Subsequently, the thickness of the inner nuclear layer (INL) and the expression levels of such genes as Vegf and Atf4, which are stress markers of the endoplasmic reticulum, were examined. Primary human cultured retinal microvascular endothelial cells (HRMECs) were treated with timolol under hypoxic conditions, after which the gene expression pattern was investigated. Importantly, an integrated stress response inhibitor (ISRIB) was used in the RVO model, he known ISRIB, which suppresses the expression of ATF4 in retinal edema.
Increased INL thickness was suppressed by timolol eye drops, as were the expressions of Vegf and Atf4, in the RVO model. However, latanoprost eye drops did not induce any change in INL thickness. In HRMECs, hypoxic stress and serum deprivation increased the Vegf and Atf4 expressions; in response, treatment with timolol suppressed the Vegf expression. Furthermore, the ISRIB decreased the Vegf expression pattern and edema formation, which are associated with RVO.
These results indicate that timolol eye drops may be a potential option for RVO treatment.

Recent advancements in prostaglandin analogs (PGAs) have reinforced their role in managing intraocular pressure (IOP). Latanoprost excels in 24-h IOP control, while various PGAs offer similar effectiveness and side effects, generic PGAs perform as well as branded ones, and a notable IOP rise observed upon PGA discontinuation. Formulations with or without preservatives show comparable IOP reduction and adherence, often surpassing benzalkonium chloride (BAK)-preserved options. Emergent PGAs, such as latanoprostene bunod, fixed-dose netarsudil combined with latanoprost, and omidenepag Isopropyl, offer enhanced or non-inferior IOP reduction. The bimatoprost implant introduces a novel administration method with effective IOP reduction. These developments underscore ongoing progress in PGA-focused ophthalmological research. This article offers a comprehensive review of available prostanoid analogs and explores new developments.

Prostaglandins and their receptors regulate various physiological processes. Carboprost, an analog of prostaglandin F2α and an agonist for the prostaglandin F2-alpha receptor (FP receptor), is clinically used to treat postpartum hemorrhage (PPH). However, off-target activation of closely related receptors such as the prostaglandin E receptor subtype EP3 (EP3 receptor) by carboprost results in side effects and limits the clinical application. Meanwhile, the FP receptor selective agonist latanoprost is not suitable to treat PPH due to its poor solubility and fast clearance. Here, we present two cryo-EM structures of the FP receptor bound to carboprost and latanoprost-FA (the free acid form of latanoprost) at 2.7 Å and 3.2 Å resolution, respectively. The structures reveal the molecular mechanism of FP receptor selectivity for both endogenous prostaglandins and clinical drugs, as well as the molecular mechanism of G protein coupling preference by the prostaglandin receptors. The structural information may guide the development of better prostaglandin drugs.

(1) Background: The current study aimed to compare two of the most frequently prescribed preservative-free (PF) antiglaucoma drops, (Latanoprost PF vs. Bimatoprost PF) in promoting OSD in patients with POAG. (2) Methods: In this prospective study, 44 eyes from 44 participants were included. In the control group we enrolled 24 eyes, 11 eyes treated only with Latanoprost PF were enrolled in the Latanoprost PF group, and 9 eyes treated only with Bimatoprost PF in the Bimatoprost PF group. In all eyes, we evaluated the ocular levels of MMP-9 using the InflammaDry kit. We also performed Schirmer\'s test and the TBUT test. (3) Results: We found elevated ocular levels of MMP-9 (>40 ng/mL) in the Bimatoprost PF group (88.89% of the participants) compared to the control (8.33%) and the Latanoprost PF group (27.27%), and the difference was statistically significant (p < 0.001). The Schirmer\'s test values were statistically significantly lower in the Bimatoprost PF group compared to the other two groups. Additionally, the TBUT values were lower in the Bimatoprost PF group compared to the control group, and the difference was statistically significant. (4) Conclusions: Latanoprost PF eye drops treat the ocular surface better and they do not induce overexpression of MMP-9, a molecule that is related to OSD.

This study demonstrates the efficacy and safety of once-daily 0.002% omidenepag isopropyl (OMDI) in patients with primary open angle glaucoma (POAG) or ocular hypertension (OHT) who do not respond or respond poorly to latanoprost.
The purpose of this study was to evaluate the intraocular pressure (IOP)-lowering efficacy and safety of OMDI in latanoprost low/nonresponders with POAG or OHT.
Phase 3, nonrandomized, 2-phase, open-label, multicenter study (NCT03697811) in the United States. Key inclusion criteria included individuals aged 18 years or above, POAG or OHT diagnosis in both eyes, IOP ≥22 mm Hg in ≥1 eye, and ≤34 mm Hg in both eyes at all time points. Overall, 107 patients were enrolled; 104 completed treatment. Included a screening period (≤35-day washout period and 8-week latanoprost run-in period) and a 3-month treatment period comprising one drop of OMDI 0.002% once daily in both eyes. The primary study endpoint was changed from baseline in the mean diurnal (MD) IOP at month 3. Safety endpoints included incidence of adverse events, serious adverse events, and adverse drug reactions.
At baseline (visit 4), 75 (70.1%) patients had POAG, 32 (29.9%) had OHT, and 68 (63.6%) had prior use of prostaglandin/prostaglandin analogs (37.4% of whom used latanoprost). The mean (SD) baseline MD IOP was 23.34 mm Hg (2.12). The mean (SD) 3-month (visit 7) MD IOP change from baseline (following latanoprost run-in period and OMDI treatment period) was an additional decrease of 2.96 mm Hg (2.83) ( P <0.0001). No significant safety issues were reported during OMDI treatment.
These data demonstrate OMDI efficacy and safety in latanoprost low/nonresponders with POAG or OHT, suggesting OMDI is a treatment option in the patient population in this study.