目的:检查社会认同的可行性和可接受性,在线交付,在COVID-19大流行期间,跑步和步行小组计划支持低活跃的大专学生的运动行为和幸福感。
方法:双臂,非致盲,我们进行了平行先导随机对照试验,其中加拿大一所大学的低活跃专上学生同样被随机分配到在线提供的跑步/步行小组项目或注意力控制条件.主要可行性和可接受性结果包括计划兴趣,学习注册和保留,问卷填写,节目出勤,程序满意度,和情感锻炼态度。进行了程序后访谈,以确定参与者对程序的体验。次要结果包括幸福感,锻炼行为,社会认同,社会支持,锻炼身份。
结果:对92个人进行了资格筛选,和72名患者同样被随机分配到在线小组程序或注意力控制条件下。招聘超过目标样本量(60),研究依从性和问卷完成度均在90%以上,课程出勤率适中(M=5.03/8),自我报告计划满意度为中高(M=4.13/5),情感态度没有条件效应。在采访中,参与者对该计划表示满意。他们还讨论了通过在线平台与小组成员建立共同的认同感和社交联系的挑战。对运动相关的幸福感和运动身份有较小的条件影响,对其余次要结果没有条件影响。社会认同得分中等(M=4.63/7)。
结论:STRIDE计划是可行和可接受的,但在进行全面疗效试验之前,应亲自交付和试点。
背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT04857918;2021-04-20。
OBJECTIVE: Examine the feasibility and acceptability of a social
identity-informed, online delivered, running and walking group program to support low-active post-secondary students\' exercise behavior and well-being during the COVID-19 pandemic.
METHODS: A two-arm, non-blinded, parallel pilot randomized controlled trial was conducted whereby low-active post-secondary students at a Canadian university were equally randomized to an online delivered running/walking group program or an attention control condition. Primary feasibility and acceptability outcomes included program interest, study enrolment and retention, questionnaire completion, program attendance, program satisfaction, and affective exercise attitudes. Post-program interviews were conducted to ascertain participants\' experiences with the program. Secondary outcomes included well-being, exercise behavior, social
identity, social support, and exercise
identity.
RESULTS: Ninety-two individuals were screened for eligibility, and 72 were equally randomized to the online group program or attention control condition. Recruitment exceeded the target sample size (60), study adherence and questionnaire completion were above 90%, program attendance was moderate (M = 5.03/8), self-report program satisfaction was moderate-to-high (M = 4.13/5), and there was no condition effect for affective attitudes. During interviews, participants expressed satisfaction with the program. They also discussed challenges with developing a shared sense of
identity and social connection with group members via online platforms. There were small condition effects for exercise-related well-being and exercise identity and no condition effects for the remaining secondary outcomes. Social
identity scores were moderate (M = 4.63/7).
CONCLUSIONS: The STRIDE program was feasible and acceptable but should be delivered and piloted in-person before a full-scale efficacy trial is conducted.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT04857918; 2021-04-20.