The primary objective of this study is to record the clinical outcomes of autologous conditioned plasma (ACP) for the treatment of knee osteoarthritis (OA) based on published literature. Multiple databases (PubMed, Embase, Web of Science and Scopus) were searched using terms for \"knee OA\" and the intervention \"ACP\" for articles published in English to January 4, 2024. All clinical studies using ACP for knee OA were included. Studies not utilizing ACP alone, i.e. used as an adjunct with other modalities or not focusing on the management of knee OA, were excluded. Five studies, three randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and two real-world post-market studies conducted in a clinical practice met the inclusion/exclusion criteria and were included in this study. All studies demonstrated statistically significant improvements in various patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), however the studies performed in the clinical practice reported non-accomplishment of minimally clinically important difference (MCID). The results demonstrated the potential of ACP for management of knee OA, however the MCID was not achieved in real-world clinical settings. Thus, more adequately powered RCTs with longer follow-up as well as real-world post-market studies are warranted to establish long-term efficacy and justify routine clinical use, respectively, of ACP in patients suffering with knee OA.

Osteoarthritis (OA) is a common, frequently met degenerative disease, that generates pain and decreasing functionality; risk of suffering from this disorder increases with ageing. Being a complex disease, treatment is often difficult due to complications. Knee OA therapy demands a strategy that specialists agree with in considering the clinical symptoms and the disease evolution. The initial management of its treatment should be conservative requiring both a pharmacological and a non-pharmacological approach. If this conservative, noninvasive therapy fails, the surgical approach is discussed. The present review focused on the assessment of therapy choices for patients with knee OA, in order to reduce pain and enhance functionality and knee range of motion, underlying benefits and advantages for each choice. Existing data of available treatment for knee OA, both surgical and nonsurgical were analyzed, focusing on the latest results, indications, developments, and level of evidence provided by the literature in the topic.

In the field of orthopedic surgery, cemented total knee arthroplasty (TKA) is considered to be one of the gold standards. However, there are categories of patients (i.e., obese and morbidly obese patients, younger than 65 years old) among whom cemented TKA has however a high failure rate. Moreover, the frequency of using uncemented TKA is increasing due to the potential benefits of long-term biological fixation, being an innovative field that addresses a new generation orthopedic surgical treatment which is more suitable for young patients who have good bone quality (good to very good, in terms of density). The survival rates and functional results of the latest generation of cementless TKAs may be similar to functional results and survival rates of cemented prosthesis. In conclusion, this review-type article can be considered a powerful database, extremely informative, dense, and focused on the topic mentioned above, in the interest of all medical professionals and all interested individuals.

For a population with knee osteoarthritis (OA), determine: 1) the prevalence of single compartmental, bicompartmental and tricompartmental OA, 2) the prevalence of isolated medial tibiofemoral, lateral tibiofemoral, or patellofemoral OA, and combinations thereof.
PubMed and Web of Science databases, and reference lists of identified studies, were searched to find studies which reported on the compartmental distribution and prevalence of knee OA. Two independent reviewers assessed studies against pre-defined inclusion criteria and prevalence data were extracted along with subject characteristics. The methodological quality of each included study was assessed. A random-effects model meta-analysis was performed for each OA category to estimate the relative prevalence of OA in the knee compartments amongst people with knee OA.
16 studies (3,786 knees) met the inclusion criteria. High heterogeneity was measured. Normalised for knees with OA, estimated prevalence rates (95% CI) were: single compartmental 50% (31.5-58.3%), bicompartmental 33% (23.1-37.2%) and tricompartmental only 17% (8.8-24.8%). Isolated medial tibiofemoral OA, isolated patellofemoral OA, and combined medial tibiofemoral and patellofemoral OA were more common than tricompartmental disease, occurring in 27% (15.2-31.1%), 18% (9.9-22.7%) and 23% (14.1-27.3%) of people respectively. Single/bicompartmental patterns of disease involving the lateral tibiofemoral compartment were less common, summing to 15% (8.5-18.7%).
Three-quarters of people with knee OA do not have tricompartmental disease. This is not reflected in the frequency with which partial and combined partial knee arthroplasties are currently used.
PROSPERO systematic review protocol (CRD42019140345).