global quality score

全球质量评分
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:磁共振成像(MRI)机器是核磁共振成像技术的子集,该技术使用磁场梯度产生身体的图像。MRI机有两个组成部分:基于计算机的控制中心室和患者接受扫描的相邻MRI机房。
    目的:本研究旨在评估有关MRI机器的YouTube视频的质量和可靠性,核磁共振扫描,和MRI幽闭恐惧症,并比较不同类型上传者之间视频的质量和可靠性。方法:使用YouTube搜索算法和Google表格问卷评估10个满足研究纳入标准的视频。视频分析包括标题,查看次数,喜欢和不喜欢,注释,持续时间,来源,和内容。每个视频的质量是使用全球质量评分(GQS)确定的,可靠性评分,和视频功率指数(VPI),每个量词都使用SPSS软件进行统计分析,版本21.0(IBMCorp.,Armonk,纽约)以确定是否有任何意义。
    结果:为了确定组间的统计学差异,在量词GQS上使用了Kruskal-Wallis检验,可靠性评分,和VPI来生成p值。VPI的p值为0.467,GQS为0.277,可靠性为0.316。所有的p值都大于0.05,表明没有统计学支持两组之间的VPI有任何显着差异,GQS和可靠性评分。
    结论:YouTube视频包含有关MRI机器的高质量和可靠信息,MRI程序,和幽闭恐惧症,特别是那些由临床医生和医院上传的,可以提供正确的信息,帮助患者决定接受这些手术,缓解幽闭恐惧症。
    BACKGROUND: The Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) machine is a subset of nuclear magnetic resonance imaging technology that produces images of the body using magnetic field gradients. The MRI Machine has two components: the computer-based control centre room and the adjacent MRI machine room where the patient undergoes the scan.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to assess the quality and reliability of YouTube videos about MRI machines, MRI scans, and MRI claustrophobia and compare the quality and reliability of the videos among different types of uploaders.  Methodology: The YouTube Search Algorithm and a Google Sheets questionnaire were used to evaluate 10 videos that satisfied the inclusion criteria of the study. The video analytics included were title, number of views, likes and dislikes, comments, duration, source, and content. The quality of each video was established using the Global Quality Score (GQS), Reliability Score, and Video Power Index (VPI), where each quantifier went through statistical analysis using SPSS software, version 21.0 (IBM Corp., Armonk, NY) to determine if there was any significance.
    RESULTS: In order to determine statistical differences between the groups, the Kruskal-Wallis test was used on the quantifiers GQS, reliability score, and VPI to generate p-values. The p-value for VPI is 0.467, GQS is 0.277, and reliability is 0.316. All the p-values are greater than 0.05, showing that there is no statistical support for any significant difference between the groups in their VPI, GQS and reliability scores.
    CONCLUSIONS: YouTube videos with high-quality and reliable information on MRI machines, MRI procedures, and claustrophobia, especially those uploaded by clinicians and hospitals, can provide correct information, helping patients decide to undergo these procedures and alleviate claustrophobia.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究ChatGPT在评估YouTube上最受关注的泌尿系癌症相关视频的医疗内容质量方面的可靠性。
    方法:2024年3月,为每种类型的泌尿外科癌症在YouTube上观看的前20个视频创建了播放列表。ChatGPT和泌尿科专家使用DISCERN-5和全球质量量表(GQS)问卷对视频文本进行了评估。使用Kruskal-Wallis检验比较获得的结果。
    结果:对于前列腺,膀胱,肾,和睾丸癌视频,由人类评估者和ChatGPT给出的中位数(IQR)DISCERN-5评分为(人类:4[1],3[0],3[2],3[1],P=.11;ChatGPT:3[1.75],3[1],3[2],3[0],分别为P=4)和GQS评分为(人类:4[1.75],3[0.75],3.5[2],3.5[1],P=.12;ChatGPT:4[1],3[0.75],3[1],3.5[1],分别为P=.1),得分之间没有显着差异。ChatGPT反应的可重复性被确定为与前列腺癌的25%相似。30%的膀胱癌,30%为肾癌,和35%的睾丸癌(P=0.92)。关于前列腺的视频内容,人类和ChatGPT给出的中位数(IQR)DISCERN-5和GQS得分之间没有统计学上的显着差异,膀胱,肾,和睾丸癌(P>0.05)。
    结论:尽管ChatGPT在评估视频文本的医疗质量方面是成功的,应谨慎评估结果,因为结果的重复性较低.
    OBJECTIVE: To examine the reliability of ChatGPT in evaluating the quality of medical content of the most watched videos related to urological cancers on YouTube.
    METHODS: In March 2024 a playlist was created of the first 20 videos watched on YouTube for each type of urological cancer. The video texts were evaluated by ChatGPT and by a urology specialist using the DISCERN-5 and Global Quality Scale (GQS) questionnaires. The results obtained were compared using the Kruskal-Wallis test.
    RESULTS: For the prostate, bladder, renal, and testicular cancer videos, the median (IQR) DISCERN-5 scores given by the human evaluator and ChatGPT were (Human: 4 [1], 3 [0], 3 [2], 3 [1], P = .11; ChatGPT: 3 [1.75], 3 [1], 3 [2], 3 [0], P = .4, respectively) and the GQS scores were (Human: 4 [1.75], 3 [0.75], 3.5 [2], 3.5 [1], P = .12; ChatGPT: 4 [1], 3 [0.75], 3 [1], 3.5 [1], P = .1, respectively), with no significant difference determined between the scores. The repeatability of the ChatGPT responses was determined to be similar at 25 % for prostate cancer, 30 % for bladder cancer, 30 % for renal cancer, and 35 % for testicular cancer (P = .92). No statistically significant difference was determined between the median (IQR) DISCERN-5 and GQS scores given by humans and ChatGPT for the content of videos about prostate, bladder, renal, and testicular cancer (P > .05).
    CONCLUSIONS: Although ChatGPT is successful in evaluating the medical quality of video texts, the results should be evaluated with caution as the repeatability of the results is low.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目标:YouTube,不同信息的流行来源,在美学上拥有丰富的内容。然而,对这些视频的准确性和可靠性的担忧挥之不去,有可能不准确,偏见,或误导性信息。这项研究旨在评估YouTube内容在这种受欢迎的面部增强程序中的质量和可靠性。
    方法:该研究采用了四种不同的评分工具:全球质量评分(GQS),医疗质量视频评估工具(MQ-VET),视听材料的患者教育材料评估工具(PEMAT-A/V),和视频功率指数(VPI)。
    结果:对总共173个YouTube视频进行的分析显示,这些视频的得分主要表明质量和可靠性较差。(平均得分±SD,PEMATA/V:30.75±28.8,MQ-VET:28.57±12.6,GQS:1.7±1)值得注意的是,这些视频主要由医疗保健专业人员上传(82.1%),他们更多地关注广告(46.2%),而不是科学或教育信息。他们的收视率和参与度指标(喜欢,注释,和股份)证明了它们的显著受欢迎程度和影响力。(平均VPI评分:176.6±635.8)。
    结论:YouTube对眼睑手术的影响是不可否认的,塑造患者的选择和期望。然而,不切实际的美丽理想,身体不满加剧,社会比较潜伏在其内容中,可能损害心理健康和手术决定。优先考虑合格的医疗指导和对在线信息的严格评估对患者至关重要。作者和平台必须采取负责任的行动:作者通过制作高质量的内容,通过解决错误信息的平台。
    OBJECTIVE: YouTube, a popular source for diverse information, hosts a wealth of content on aesthetic canthoplasty. Yet, concerns linger about the accuracy and reliability of these videos, with potential for inaccuracies, biases, or misleading information. This study aims to evaluate the quality and reliability of YouTube content on this sought-after facial enhancement procedure.
    METHODS: The study employs four distinct scoring tools: the Global Quality Score (GQS), the Medical Quality Video Evaluation Tool (MQ-VET), the Patient Education Materials Assessment Tool for Audiovisual Materials (PEMAT-A/V), and the Video Power Index (VPI).
    RESULTS: Analysis of a total of 173 YouTube videos relevant to aesthetic canthoplasty revealed scores that were primarily indicative of poor quality and reliability.(Mean score ± SD, PEMAT A/V: 30.75 ± 28.8, MQ-VET: 28.57 ± 12.6, GQS: 1.7 ± 1) Notably, these videos were predominantly uploaded by healthcare professionals (82.1%), and they focused more on advertisements (46.2%) than on scientific or educational information. Their elevated viewership and engagement metrics (likes, comments, and shares) attest to their significant popularity and influence. (Mean VPI score: 176.6 ± 635.8).
    CONCLUSIONS: YouTube\'s influence on aesthetic eyelid surgery is undeniable, shaping patient choices and expectations. However, unrealistic beauty ideals, heightened body dissatisfaction, and social comparisons lurk within its content, potentially harming psychological well-being and surgical decisions. Prioritizing qualified medical guidance and critical evaluation of online information are crucial for patients. Authors and platforms must act responsibly: authors by producing high-quality content, platforms by tackling misinformation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:YouTube是自闭症信息的良好来源;但是,这些内容的可靠性和质量仍然不确定。这项研究旨在使用全球质量评分(GQS)和可靠性评分来评估YouTube视频中与自闭症相关的信息的可靠性和质量。方法:2023年11月进行了横断面观察性研究。YouTube上共有48个与自闭症相关的视频是使用诸如“自闭症”之类的关键字来获取的,\'自闭症原因\',\'自闭症治疗\',和“自闭症儿童”。然后,作者观看了视频并收集了有关观看次数的数据,喜欢和评论,上传器类型,以及传播的信息类型。作者还使用GQS和修改的DISCERN评分来评估视频中信息的质量和可靠性。然后使用Kruskal-Wallis测试和IBMSPSSStatisticsforWindows对数据进行统计分析,版本22(2013年发布;IBMCorp.,Armonk,纽约,美国)。结果:在48个视频中,七个视频被排除在外,留下41个分析。包含的视频积累了25,540,635次观看,304,557喜欢,和37,039条评论。大多数视频是由医院上传的(n=15;36.59%),其次是新闻频道(n=12;29.27%)。大多数视频描述了自闭症症状(n=26;63.41%),解决潜在病因较少(n=16;39.02%)。医疗保健专业人员上传的视频的GQS中位数最高(n=5),对比新闻频道。Kruskal-Wallis检验显示显著差异(p=0.02)。结论:这些视频共同获得了大量的收视率,喜欢,和评论。大多数视频描述了自闭症症状,尽管解决的潜在原因较少。值得注意的是,医疗保健专业人员上传的视频实现了最高的GQSs,强调它们在传播可靠的自闭症信息方面的重要性。因此,医疗保健专业人员在通过YouTube传播可靠的自闭症信息方面发挥着至关重要的作用。鼓励他们参与制作信息视频可以增强公众对自闭症的理解。
    BACKGROUND: YouTube serves as a good source of information on autism; however, the reliability and quality of such content remain uncertain. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and quality of autism-related information presented in YouTube videos using the Global Quality Score (GQS) and Reliability Score.  Methods: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted in November 2023. A total of 48 autism-related videos on YouTube were sourced using keywords such as \'autism\', \'autism cause\', \'autism treatment\', and \'autism kids\'. The authors then viewed the videos and collected data regarding the number of views, likes and comments, uploader type, and type of information disseminated. The authors also used The GQS and modified DISCERN score to assess the quality and reliability of information in the videos. The data was then subjected to statistical analysis using the Kruskal-Wallis test and IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 22 (Released 2013; IBM Corp., Armonk, New York, United States).  Results: Out of 48 videos, seven videos were excluded, leaving 41 for analysis. The included videos amassed 25,540,635 views, 304,557 likes, and 37,039 comments. The majority of videos were uploaded by hospitals (n=15; 36.59%), followed by news channels (n=12; 29.27%). Most videos described autism symptoms (n=26; 63.41%), with fewer addressing potential etiology (n=16; 39.02%). The median GQS was highest for videos uploaded by healthcare professionals (n=5), contrasting with news channels. The Kruskal-Wallis test revealed significant differences (p=0.02).  Conclusion: These videos collectively garnered substantial viewership, likes, and comments. Most videos described autism symptoms, although fewer addressed potential causes. Notably, videos uploaded by healthcare professionals achieved the highest GQSs, highlighting their significance in disseminating reliable autism information. Healthcare professionals therefore play a crucial role in disseminating reliable autism information via YouTube. Encouraging their involvement in creating informative videos can enhance public understanding of autism.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心悸是指快速的感觉,飘动,或者胸部心跳,其决定因素可能从荷尔蒙变化到焦虑或心律失常。YouTube是人们信任的最流行和最受欢迎的基于网络的平台之一,可以帮助他们更多地了解自己的健康状况。因此,这项研究旨在评估该平台上有关心悸的内容质量是否可靠和足够。使用上传日期和时间等标准分析了71个YouTube视频,上传器的类型,和内容类型。使用全球质量评分(GQS)和修改的DISCERN评分来分析所提供信息的质量和可靠性。MicrosoftExcel(MicrosoftCorporation,雷德蒙德,WA,美国)用于数据分析,和StataCorp的2023年Stata统计软件(学院站,TX,US)用于统计分析和可视化。在分析的71个视频中,90.14%是一年多前上传的,80.28%的人详细描述了症状学,81.69%准确描述了病因。医院和医生是最常见的上传者,分别占上传视频的23%和19%,分别,并具有较高的GQSs(GQS中位数=4)。最高分也属于患有该疾病的患者上传的视频(中值GQS=5)。医院和新闻频道的可靠性得分最高(中位数分别为4)。人们确定,尽管来源不同,该平台提供的内容的性质包含宣传材料和内容空白;YouTube应该,因此,批判性地使用,并根据专业来源。
    Palpitations refer to the sensation of rapid, fluttering, or pounding heartbeats in the chest, the determinants of which may range from hormonal changes to anxiety or arrhythmias. YouTube is one of the most prevailing and accepted web-based platforms people trust to help them understand more about their health conditions. Thus, this study aims to assess whether the quality of content about palpitations on this platform is reliable and sufficient. Seventy-one YouTube videos were analyzed using criteria such as date and time of upload, type of uploader, and type of content. The Global Quality Score (GQS) and modified DISCERN score were used to analyze the quality and reliability of the information provided. Microsoft Excel (Microsoft Corporation, Redmond, WA, US) was used for data analysis, and StataCorp\'s 2023 Stata Statistical Software (College Station, TX, US) was used for statistical analysis and visualization. Of the 71 videos analyzed, 90.14% were uploaded more than a year ago, 80.28% described the symptomatology in detail, and 81.69% accurately described the etiological factors. Hospitals and doctors were the most common uploaders, constituting 23% and 19% of the uploaded videos, respectively, and had high GQSs (Median GQS = 4). The highest scores also belonged to videos uploaded by patients suffering from the disease (Median GQS = 5). Hospitals and news channels ranked highest on the reliability score (Median DISCERN = 4, respectively). It was determined that despite varied sources, the nature of content provided by the platform contains promotional material and content gaps; YouTube should, therefore, be used critically and as per professional sources.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:OpenAI创建了ChatGPT,一种人工智能语言模型,因其产生类似人类语言的文本响应的能力而获得了相当大的认可。因此,这项研究旨在评估ChatGPT的回答在解决与前列腺相关的公开查询方面的有效性,肾,膀胱,和睾丸癌.
    方法:与前列腺有关的常见问题(FAQ)的综合汇编,膀胱,肾,睾丸癌来自不同的来源。此外,我们参考了欧洲泌尿外科协会(EAU)2023年肿瘤学指南中概述的建议.所选择的评估问题已提交给ChatGPT4.0高级版本。ChatGPT反应的质量使用全局质量评分(GQS)进行评估。每个ChatGPT反应由一组医生独立审查,他们分配了GQS评分来评估其整体质量。
    结果:对于前列腺癌,64.6%的问题的GQS评分为5,而膀胱的GQS评分为62.9%,肾脏占68.1%,睾丸癌占63.9%,而没有一个反应的GQS评分为1。同时,回答比例最低的类别,每种疾病的GQS评分为5分,预后和随访。EAU指南问题答案的平均GQS得分在统计学上显着低于FAQ答案的平均得分。
    结论:ChatGPT是解决泌尿系癌症一般问题的有价值的工具,拥有值得称赞的准确率。尽管如此,其在回答与EAU指南一致的问题方面的表现被认为不令人满意.
    OpenAI has created ChatGPT, an artificial intelligence language model that has gained considerable recognition for its capacity to produce text responses resembling human language. Consequently, this study seeks to evaluate the effectiveness of ChatGPT\'s responses in addressing publicly accessible queries related to prostate, kidney, bladder, and testicular cancers.
    A comprehensive compilation of frequently asked questions (FAQs) pertaining to prostate, bladder, kidney, and testicular cancers was gathered from diverse sources. Additionally, the recommendations outlined in the European Association of Urology (EAU) 2023 Guideline Oncology were consulted. The chosen questions for evaluation were presented to the ChatGPT 4.0 premium version. The quality of ChatGPT responses was appraised using the global quality score (GQS). Each ChatGPT response was independently reviewed by a panel of physicians, who assigned a GQS score to assess its overall quality.
    For prostate cancer, 64.6% of the questions had a GQS score of 5, compared to 62.9 % for bladder, 68.1% for kidney, and 63.9% for testicular cancers, whereas none of the responses had a GQS score of 1. Meanwhile, the category with the lowest proportion of responses, with a GQS score of 5 for each disease, was prognosis and follow-up. The mean GQS score of the answers given to EAU guideline questions was statistically significantly lower than the average score of the answers given to FAQs.
    ChatGPT is a valuable tool for addressing general inquiries regarding urological cancers, boasting commendable accuracy rates. Nonetheless, its performance in responding to questions aligned with the EAU guideline was deemed unsatisfactory.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    介绍双相情感障碍是一种慢性和反复发作的疾病,其特征是能量和情绪的波动,可以使未经治疗的个体衰弱。当医生临床诊断病情时,患者经常从其他渠道寻求信息。社交媒体平台,比如Instagram,有助于更方便地获取有关双相情感障碍的补充信息。然而,人们担心通过这些平台公开传播的信息的准确性。这项研究的目的是评估在社交媒体平台上发现的双相情感障碍信息的准确性和可靠性,Instagram。方法通过收集与流行的双相情感障碍标签相关的Instagram帖子数据,进行了横断面观察研究。为了评估所选条目的可信度,使用已建立的全球质量评分和可靠性评分的测量量表对每个岗位进行数字评分.结果在分析了196个符合纳入标准的关于双相情感障碍的Instagram条目后,研究显示,这些帖子中70.4%(n=138)由被诊断为双相情感障碍的个体共享。在这些人发布的内容中,观察到统计学显著的总体质量得分为2分和可靠性得分为1分.结论:具有卓越全球质量的经过验证的医疗信息应由负责任的各方在社交媒体平台上共享。应建议对医学知识有进一步询问的个人与当地医生联系。
    Introduction Bipolar disorder is a chronic and recurring condition marked by fluctuations in both energy and mood that can be debilitating to individuals without treatment. While physicians clinically diagnose the condition, patients frequently seek information from alternate channels. Social media platforms, such as Instagram, have facilitated more convenient access to supplementary information about bipolar disorder. Nevertheless, there is apprehension regarding the accuracy of publicly disseminated information through these platforms. The aim of this study is to evaluate the accuracy and dependability of information about Bipolar disorder found on the social media platform, Instagram. Methodology A cross-sectional observational study was conducted by gathering data from Instagram posts linked with popular bipolar disorder hashtags. To evaluate the credibility of the chosen entries, numerical ratings were assigned to each post using the established measurement scales of the Global Quality Score and Reliability Score. Results After analyzing 196 Instagram entries about Bipolar Disorder that fulfilled inclusion criteria, the study revealed that 70.4% (n=138) of these posts were shared by individuals diagnosed with bipolar disorder. Among the content posted by these individuals, a statistically significant global quality score of 2 and a reliability score of 1 were observed. Conclusions Verified medical information of superior global quality should be shared on social media platforms by accountable parties. Individuals with further inquiries about medical knowledge should be advised to reach out to local physicians.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    介绍血管造影术是一种通过检测注射到血管中的造影剂并将其投射到X射线序列上来限定血管内壁并显示通过管腔的流动的方法。该方法用于对血管系统的解剖和结构方面进行成像。通过球囊扩张和植入支架来扩大狭窄的动脉,血管成形术是一种微创血管内治疗,用于治疗心血管疾病及其后果。人们经常依赖YouTube作为提高认识和营销活动的资源。动画和视觉解释可以帮助患者了解手术的风险和益处。目的评估YouTube上有关血管造影和血管成形术的信息的质量和可靠性。我们使用GQS(全球质量量表)评估质量,并通过可靠性评分评估可靠性。方法论这是一个观察,没有伦理委员会要求的横断面研究。它包括具有预定标准的问卷,例如自上传以来的时间,人气,或上传器的类型。该研究评估了YouTube视频,其中包括使用GQS和可靠性评分的标准。Google表格中记录的回复已转移到MicrosoftExcel(Redmond,美国)。使用IBM公司进行统计分析2012年发布IBMSPSSStatisticsforWindows,版本21.0。Armonk,纽约:IBM公司所有六位作者都使用特定的关键字评估了10个YouTube视频。该研究包括符合纳入标准的视频。不包括纳入标准的视频被排除在外。结果应用纳入/排除标准后,包括60个视频中的57个。在分析的所有视频中,大多数是由多家医院以及医生和医疗机构以外的人上传的。大约78.95%的视频描述了血管造影/成形术的原因,其次是涉及的解剖区域和术前准备阶段。医生上传的视频中,GQS评分和可靠性评分均有显著上升,医院,医疗机构,和其他团体。结论医生应负责任地上传经过验证的健康信息,医院,医疗机构,或其他机构在社交媒体上,如YouTube,以易于理解的方式,有很高的GQS,并且具有很高的可靠性得分,因为这将使普通人群或观众更容易获得他们可以依赖的重要健康相关内容。视频应建议观众联系他们的医生,以获取有关其健康问题的诊断或治疗的所有疑问。
    Introduction Angiography is a method for defining the inner vessel wall and demonstrating flow through the lumen by detecting contrast injection into a blood vessel and projecting it onto a sequence of X-rays. This method is used to image the anatomical and architectural aspects of the vascular system. By employing balloon dilatation and the implantation of stents to widen the stenosed arteries, angioplasty is a form of minimally invasive endovascular treatment used to treat cardiovascular diseases and their consequences. People frequently rely on YouTube as a resource for awareness-raising and marketing activities. Animations and visual explanations can help patients understand the risks and benefits of procedures. Aims To assess the quality and reliability of the information on YouTube about angiography and angioplasty. We assessed quality using the GQS (Global Quality Scale) and reliability via the reliability score. Methodology This is an observational, cross-sectional study without the requirement of an ethics committee. It includes a questionnaire with predetermined criteria like time since upload, popularity, or type of uploader. The study assesses YouTube videos that include criteria using GQS and reliability scores. Responses recorded in Google Sheets were transferred to Microsoft Excel (Redmond, USA). Statistical analysis was performed using IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. Armonk, NY: IBM Corp. All six authors assessed 10 YouTube videos using specific keywords. The study includes videos that meet the inclusion criteria. Videos that did not include the inclusion criteria were excluded. Results After applying inclusion/exclusion criteria, 57 out of 60 videos were included. Of the total videos analyzed, the majority were uploaded by various hospitals and people other than doctors and healthcare organizations. About 78.95% of the videos described the reason for angiography/plasty, followed by the anatomical area involved and the pre-procedural preparation phase. There is a significant increase in the GQS score and reliability score among the videos uploaded by doctors, hospitals, healthcare organizations, and other groups. Conclusions Verified health information should be uploaded responsibly by doctors, hospitals, healthcare organizations, or other agencies on social media like YouTube in a manner that is easy to understand, has a high GQS, and has a high reliability score, as it would make it simpler for the general population or viewers to have access to important health-related content they can rely on. Videos should advise the viewers to contact their doctors for all queries regarding the diagnosis or treatment of their health concerns.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在医疗保健领域利用,社交媒体提供了许多好处。然而,它的缺点包括不受管制和无监督内容的可变质量。因此,我们旨在评估Instagram上发现的与胸痛相关的内容信息,并通过Instagram帖子分析胸痛相关内容的质量和可靠性。
    方法:在结构化问卷的帮助下,对包含胸痛相关内容的Instagram帖子进行分析,问卷包括全球质量量表(GQS)和DISCERN评分(DS)。要收集Instagram帖子,采用了几个不同的标签:#chestpain,#chestpains,#心绞痛,#anginatreatment,#心脏病发作,#心脏病幸存者,#预防心脏病。
    结果:共纳入262个职位,其中29.7%的总职位(n=78)包含描述该疾病病因的信息。27.8%的总帖子(n=73)包含宣传内容。发现帖子由医生上传(18.7%),医院(15.6%),患者(17.9%),营养师(11.1%),医疗机构(9.2%),和其他(27.5%)。全局质量和DISCERN评分均具有统计学意义,p值为0.001。
    结论:这项研究的结果表明,通过医生发布的大多数关于胸痛的Instagram内容非常可靠,并且具有更好的全球质量评分。关于各种原因的信息,Instagram上的症状和预防措施可以被认为是患者冲浪的可接受来源。一个主要的限制是只分析了英语内容。在未来,使用医疗保健专业人员制作的更高质量的帖子可能有助于通过Instagram加强患者教育。
    BACKGROUND: Utilized in the healthcare sector, social media offers numerous benefits. However, its drawbacks encompass the variable quality of unregulated and unsupervised content. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the information in content related to chest pain found across Instagram and analyze the quality and reliability of chest pain-related content via Instagram posts.
    METHODS: Instagram posts with content related to chest pain were analyzed with the help of a structured questionnaire that included the Global Quality Scale (GQS) and DISCERN score (DS). To collect Instagram posts, several distinct hashtags were employed: #chestpain, #chestpains, #angina, #anginatreatment, #heartattack, #heartattacksurvivor, #heartattackprevention.
    RESULTS: A total of 262 posts were included, of which 29.7% of the total posts (n=78) contained information that describes the etiology of the disease. 27.8% of the total posts (n = 73) enclosed promotional content. Posts were found to be uploaded by doctors (18.7%), hospitals (15.6%), patients (17.9%), dieticians (11.1%), healthcare organizations (9.2%), and others (27.5%). Both Global Quality and DISCERN scores were statistically significant with a p-value of 0.001.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this study revealed that most of the Instagram content on chest pain posted via physicians were highly reliable and had a better global quality score. Information regarding various causes, symptoms and preventive measures on Instagram can be considered as an acceptable source for patients to surf on. A major limitation is that only English content was analyzed. In the future, the use of higher quality posts produced by healthcare professionals could potentially contribute to enhancing patient education via Instagram.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:癫痫被定义为以癫痫发作的持久易感性为特征的脑部疾病。是世界上最常见的神经系统疾病,有关癫痫的信息是由来自不同来源的人收集的。
    目的:本研究的目的是评估关于癫痫的YouTube视频的可靠性和质量,作为普通人群、患有这种疾病的患者及其家人的信息来源。
    方法:进行了横断面观察研究,利用在谷歌表格上准备的问卷(谷歌有限责任公司,山景,加州,美国)具有预定标准。六位作者中的每一位都使用特定的关键字独立搜索和评估了10个YouTube视频。评估包括确定全球质量得分和利用DISCERN工具。将收集的数据记录在MicrosoftExcel中并随后进行分析。
    结果:共分析了60个视频,76.27%的人提供了关于癫痫可用治疗方案的信息,71.19%解释了病因和病因,只有3.39%的视频提到了支持团体。
    结论:我们的研究强调了在社交媒体平台上评估医疗信息的重要性,以确保癫痫患者获得高质量和可靠性的正确信息。这将有助于了解他们的医疗健康问题和决策。
    BACKGROUND: Epilepsy is defined as a disorder of the brain characterized by an enduring predisposition to epileptic seizures. Being the most common neurological condition in the world, information regarding epilepsy is gathered by people from different available sources.
    OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to evaluate the reliability and quality of YouTube videos about epilepsy as a source of information for the general population and also for patients suffering from this illness and for their families.
    METHODS: A cross-sectional observational study was conducted, utilizing a questionnaire prepared on Google Forms (Google LLC, Mountain View, California, United States) with predetermined criteria. Each of the six authors independently searched and evaluated 10 YouTube videos using specific keywords. The assessment included determining the global quality score and utilizing the DISCERN tool. The collected data was recorded in Microsoft Excel and subsequently analyzed.
    RESULTS: A total of 60 videos were analyzed, revealing that 76.27% of them provided information on the available treatment options for epilepsy, 71.19% explained the cause and etiology of the condition, and only 3.39% of the videos mentioned support groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the importance of assessment of medical information on social media platforms in order to ensure availability of correct information with high quality and reliability for epilepsy patients. This will help in understanding their medical health issues and decision making.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号