背景:TikTok是消费者获取和采纳健康信息的重要渠道。但TikTok中健康内容的质量仍未得到充分调查。
目的:我们的研究旨在确定上传来源,内容,和TikTok上胆结石疾病视频的特征信息,并进一步评估与视频质量相关的因素。
方法:我们调查了TikTok上的前100个与胆结石相关的视频,并分析了这些视频的上传来源,内容,和特点。使用DISCERN仪器等定量评分工具评估视频质量,美国医学会杂志(JAMA)基准标准,和全球质量分数(GQS)。此外,视频质量和视频特征之间的相关性,包括持续时间,喜欢,注释,和股份,进一步调查。
结果:根据视频来源,81%的视频是由医生发布的。此外,疾病知识是最主要的视频内容,占所有视频的56%。意思是否定的,JAMA,所有100个视频的GQS得分为39.61(SD11.36),2.00(标准差0.40),和2.76(标准差0.95),分别。根据DISCERN和GQS,与胆结石相关的视频\'TikTok上的质量得分不高,主要在博览会上(43/100,43%,)和中等(46/100,46%)。医生的DISCERN总分明显高于个人和通讯社,手术技术明显高于生活方式和新闻,疾病知识明显高于新闻,分别。DISCERN评分与视频持续时间呈正相关。DISCERN分数与视频的喜欢和份额之间存在负相关。在GQS分析中,基于不同来源或不同内容的组间没有发现显著差异。由于缺乏辨别力和无法准确评估视频质量,JAMA在视频质量和相关性分析中被排除在外。
结论:尽管TikTok上的胆结石视频主要由医生提供,并且包含疾病知识,质量很低。我们发现视频持续时间和视频质量之间存在正相关。高质量的视频受到较低的关注,受欢迎的视频质量很低。目前TikTok上的医疗信息还不够严谨,无法指导患者做出准确的判断。由于信息的质量和可靠性低,TikTok不是教育患者的适当知识来源。
TikTok was an important channel for consumers to access and adopt health information. But the quality of health content in TikTok remains underinvestigated.
Our
study aimed to identify upload sources, contents, and feature information of gallstone disease videos on TikTok and further evaluated the factors related to video quality.
We investigated the first 100 gallstone-related videos on TikTok and analyzed these videos\' upload sources, content, and characteristics. The quality of videos was evaluated using quantitative scoring tools such as DISCERN instrument, the Journal of American Medical Association (JAMA) benchmark criteria, and Global Quality Scores (GQS). Moreover, the correlation between video quality and video characteristics, including duration, likes, comments, and shares, was further investigated.
According to video sources, 81% of the videos were posted by doctors. Furthermore, disease knowledge was the most dominant video content, accounting for 56% of all the videos. The mean DISCERN, JAMA, and GQS scores of all 100 videos are 39.61 (SD 11.36), 2.00 (SD 0.40), and 2.76 (SD 0.95), respectively. According to DISCERN and GQS, gallstone-related videos\' quality score on TikTok is not high, mainly at fair (43/100, 43%,) and moderate (46/100, 46%). The total DISCERN scores of doctors were significantly higher than that of individuals and news agencies, surgery techniques were significantly higher than lifestyle and news, and disease knowledge was significantly higher than news, respectively. DISCERN scores and video duration were positively correlated. Negative correlations were found between DISCERN scores and likes and shares of videos. In GQS analysis, no significant differences were found between groups based on different sources or different contents. JAMA was excluded in the video quality and correlation analysis due to a lack of discrimination and inability to evaluate the video quality accurately.
Although the videos of gallstones on TikTok are mainly provided by doctors and contain disease knowledge, they are of low quality. We found a positive correlation between video duration and video quality. High-quality videos received low attention, and popular videos were of low quality. Medical information on TikTok is currently not rigorous enough to guide patients to make accurate judgments. TikTok was not an appropriate source of knowledge to educate patients due to the low quality and reliability of the information.