背景:富血小板血浆(PRP)治疗广泛用于增强骨骼肌从损伤中的恢复。然而,在运动性肌肉损伤中,肌肉内递送PRP对血液学和生化反应的影响尚未完全阐明.本研究的目的是肌内递送PRP对高强度肌肉运动引起的血液学和生化反应以及恢复策略肌肉损伤的影响(运动引起的肌肉损伤,EIMD)。
方法:中等活动的男性志愿者参加了这项研究,并被分配到对照组(对照组,n=6)和PRP给药组(PRP,n=6)。受试者以80%的负荷进行运动,一次重复最大(1RM)最大的肘屈肌自主收缩,直到达到非优势臂的疲惫点。24小时EIMD后用盐水或自体PRP处理手臂。在早晨和运动后1-4天获取静脉血样本以建立基线值,并分析血清铁蛋白,铁,铁结合能力(IBC),肌酐激酶(CK),乳酸脱氢酶(LDH),天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST),丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)。
结果:血浆铁的基线水平,铁蛋白,IBC,CK,LDH,AST,对照组和PRP组的ALT相似。然而,运动后24小时,在恢复期的1至4天之间,两组均观察到这些参数显着增加。有趣的是,与运动后第二天的对照相比,PRP给药降低了血浆铁水平。与对照组相比,PRP组在运动后第2天至第4天的血浆IBC增加,而PRP给药对血浆铁蛋白没有影响,CK,AST,ALT,或LDH。
结论:急性力竭运动增加了肌肉损伤标志物,包括等离子铁,IBC,和铁蛋白水平,表明运动引起的肌肉损伤。PRP给药通过逆转运动后铁水平的增加而改善炎症,而不表现出任何肌毒性,并且可能在运动引起的肌肉损伤的恢复中发挥作用。
BACKGROUND: Platelet rich plasma (PRP) therapy is widely used in enhancing the recovery of skeletal muscle from injury. However, the impact of intramuscular delivery of PRP on hematologic and biochemical responses has not been fully elucidated in exercise-induced muscle damage. The purpose of this investigation the effects of intramuscular delivery of PRP on hematologic and biochemical responses and recovery strategy muscle damage induced by high intensity muscle exercise (exercise-induced muscle damage, EIMD).
METHODS: Moderately active male volunteers participated in this
study and were assigned to a control group (control, n = 6) and PRP administration group (PRP, n = 6). The subjects performed exercise with a load of 80% one repetition maximum (1RM) maximal voluntary contraction of the elbow flexors until point of exhaustion of the non-dominant arm was reached. The arms were treated with saline or autologous PRP post-24 h EIMD. Venous blood samples were obtained in the morning to establish a baseline value and 1-4 days post-exercise and were analyzed for serum ferritin, iron, iron binding capacity (IBC), creatinine kinase (CK), lactate dehydrogenase (LDH), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), and alanine aminotransferase (ALT).
RESULTS: The baseline levels of plasma iron, ferritin, IBC, CK, LDH, AST, and ALT were similar in both the control and PRP groups. However, 24-h following exercise a significant increase in these parameters was observed in both groups between 1 and 4 days during the recovery period. Interestingly, PRP administration decreased plasma iron levels compared to the control on the second day post-exercise. Plasma IBC increased in PRP group from Days 2 to 4 post-exercise compared to the control group whilst PRP administration had no effect on plasma ferritin, CK, AST, ALT, or LDH.
CONCLUSIONS: Acute exhaustive exercise increased muscle damage markers, including plasma iron, IBC, and ferritin levels, indicating muscle damage induced by exercise. PRP administration improves inflammation by reversing the increase in the iron levels post-exercise without displaying any myotoxicity and may have a role to play in the recovery of exercise-induced muscle damage.