disease-free survival

无病生存
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:<500µm的垂直边缘(VM)距离是内镜切除的T1大肠癌(CRC)患者复发的危险因素。我们旨在确定VM距离对T1CRC复发和预后的影响。
    方法:我们在2008年至2016年期间在多个中心招募了168例T1CRC患者,这些患者在内镜黏膜下剥离术(ESD)后接受了额外的手术。无患者随访时间<5年。纳入的168例患者被分为VM距离<500µm的患者,包括阳性VM(n=72[43%],VM距离<500µm组)和VM距离≥500µm的患者(n=96[57%],VM距离≥500µm组)。临床病理特征,复发率,并使用倾向评分匹配(PSM)比较各组间的预后.
    结果:在VM距离<500µm的168例患者中有8例(5%)肿瘤复发。PSM之后,VM距离<500µm组的总体复发率和局部复发率显著高于VM距离≥500µm组.PSM后VM距离≥500µm组的5年无复发生存率明显高于VM距离<500µm组(100%vs.89%,p<0.012)。
    结论:通过ESD完整整块切除T1CRC必须包括足够量的SM,以降低额外手术后转移和复发的风险。
    PURPOSE : A vertical margin (VM) distance of < 500 µm is a risk factor for recurrence in patients with T1 colorectal carcinoma (CRC) resected by endoscopy. We aimed to determine the effects of the VM distance on the recurrence and prognosis of T1 CRC.
    METHODS: We enrolled 168 patients with T1 CRC who underwent additional surgery after endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) at multiple centers between 2008 and 2016. None of the patients were followed up for < 5 years. The enrolled 168 patients were classified into patients with VM distance of < 500 µm including positive VM (n = 72 [43%], VM distance < 500 µm group) and patients with VM distance of ≥ 500 µm (n = 96 [57%], VM distance ≥ 500 µm group). The clinicopathological features, recurrence rates, and prognoses were compared between the groups using propensity-score matching (PSM).
    RESULTS: Tumors recurred in eight of the 168 patients (5%) with VM distance < 500 µm. After PSM, the rate of overall recurrence and local recurrence in the VM distance < 500 µm group were significantly higher than those in the VM distance ≥ 500 µm group. The 5-year recurrence-free survival rate was significantly higher in the VM distance ≥ 500 µm group than that in VM distance < 500 µm group after PSM (100% vs. 89%, p < 0.012).
    CONCLUSIONS: Complete en bloc resection of T1 CRC via ESD must include a sufficient amount of SM to reduce the risk of metastasis and recurrence after additional surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    同源细胞在细胞结构(hoCIC)与肿瘤增殖有关,入侵,和转移,被认为是各种癌症的有希望的预后标志物。然而,hoCIC在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的作用尚不清楚.肿瘤组织切片取自411名NSCLC患者。我们分析了临床病理变量与hoCIC数量之间的关系。采用LASSO和多变量Cox回归分析确定NSCLC的预后因素。使用Kaplan-Meier曲线和对数秩检验评估hoCIC对总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)的影响。使用C索引开发并验证了OS和DFS的预后模型,时间依赖性曲线下面积(AUC),净重新分类改进(NRI),综合歧视改进(IDI),校准曲线和判定曲线分析(DCA)。在队列中,56%的患者有hoCIC,而44%的患者没有。值得注意的是,hoCIC主要发现于肿瘤浸润前沿。男性,吸烟,鳞状细胞癌,低分化,肿瘤大小≥3厘米,高级TNM阶段,淋巴结转移,胸膜侵犯,血管浸润,坏死,P53突变,和Ki-67的高表达被确定为hoCIC的相对危险因素。此外,HOCIC被发现是OS和DFS的重要预后因素,更高的HOCIC频率与较差的结果相关。我们构建了用于预测1-,3-,以及基于hoCIC的5年OS和DFS,校准曲线显示预测和实际结果之间的良好一致性。C指数的结果,时间依赖性AUC,NRI,IDI,和DCA分析表明,将hoCIC纳入预后模型可显着增强其预测能力和临床适用性。HoCIC显示了NSCLC患者OS和DFS的独立指示值。此外,hoCIC在肿瘤浸润前沿的频繁定位表明,hoCIC与肿瘤浸润和转移之间存在很强的相关性.
    Homotypic cell-in-cell structures (hoCICs) are associated with tumor proliferation, invasion, and metastasis and is considered a promising prognostic marker in various cancers. However, the role of hoCICs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. Tumor tissue sections were obtained from 411 NSCLC patients. We analyzed the relationship between clinicopathological variables and the number of hoCICs. LASSO and multivariate Cox regression analysis were employed to identify prognostic factors for NSCLC. The impact of hoCICs on overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) was assessed using the Kaplan-Meier curves and log-rank test. Prognostic models for OS and DFS were developed and validated using the C-index, time-dependent area under the curve (AUC), net reclassification improvement (NRI), integrated discrimination improvement (IDI), calibration curves and decision curve analysis (DCA). Among the cohort, 56% of patients had hoCICs while 44% did not. Notably, hoCICs were primarily found at the tumor invasion front. Male gender, smoking, squamous cell carcinoma, low differentiation, tumor size ≥ 3 cm, advanced TNM stage, lymph node metastasis, pleural invasion, vascular invasion, necrosis, P53 mutation, and high expression of Ki-67 were identified as relative risk factors for hoCICs. Furthermore, hoCICs was found to be a significant prognostic factor for both OS and DFS, with higher frequencies of hoCICs correlating with poorer outcomes. We constructed nomograms for predicting 1-, 3-, and 5-year OS and DFS based on hoCICs, and the calibration curves showed good agreement between the predicted and actual outcomes. The results of the C-index, time-dependent AUC, NRI, IDI, and DCA analyses demonstrated that incorporating hoCICs into the prognostic model significantly enhanced its predictive power and clinical applicability. HoCICs indicated independent perdictive value for OS and DFS in patients with NSCLC. Furthermore, the frequent localization of hoCICs at the tumor invasion front suggested a strong association between hoCICs and tumor invasion as well as metastasis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:经肛门全直肠系膜切除术(TaTME),一种治疗低位直肠癌的新方法,持有承诺。然而,由于全球研究结果不理想,某些国家对肿瘤安全性存在担忧.这项研究旨在评估德国TaTME手术后局部复发率和总体生存率的长期肿瘤学结果。
    方法:本研究分析了2014年至2021年在德国四个经过认证的结直肠癌中心接受选择性TaTME手术的患者的数据。主要终点是3年局部复发率和无局部复发生存率(LRFS)。次要结局包括总生存期(OS),手术时间,局部肿瘤切除的完整性,淋巴结切除,术后并发症。
    结果:共分析了378例患者(平均年龄61.6岁;272例男性,72%)。经过2.5年的中位随访期,326例UICCI-III期和肿瘤可操作性患者纳入生存分析。8例患者局部复发,导致3年累积局部复发率为2.2%,3年LRFS率为88.1%。3年OS率为88.9%。手术后30天内,吻合口漏19例(5%),而12例患者(3.2%)存在骶前脓肿。
    结论:TaTME在解决低位直肠手术的解剖学和技术挑战方面被证明是有效的,并且与令人满意的短期和长期结果相关。然而,将其安全地整合到外科手术中需要足够的知识和先前完成的培训计划。
    BACKGROUND: Transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME), a novel approach for treating low rectal cancer, holds promise. However, concerns exist in certain countries about their oncologic safety due to less-than-optimal outcomes on global studies. This research seeks to evaluate the long-term oncologic outcomes focusing on local recurrence rate and overall survival after TaTME surgery in Germany.
    METHODS: This study analyzed data from patients who underwent elective TaTME surgery between 2014 and 2021 in four certified colorectal cancer centers in Germany. Primary endpoints were 3-year local recurrence rate and local recurrence-free survival (LRFS). Secondary outcomes encompassed overall survival (OS), operative time, completeness of local tumor resection, lymph node resection, and postoperative complications.
    RESULTS: A total of 378 patients were analyzed (mean age 61.6 years; 272 males, 72%). After a median follow-up period of 2.5 years, 326 patients with UICC-stages I-III and tumor operability included in survival analyses. Local recurrence was observed in 8 individuals, leading to a 3-year cumulative local recurrence rate of 2.2% and a 3-year LRFS rate of 88.1%. The 3-year OS rate stood at 88.9%. Within 30 days after surgery, anastomotic leakage occurred in 19 cases (5%), whereas a presacral abscess was present in 12 patients (3.2%).
    CONCLUSIONS: TaTME proves effective in addressing the anatomical and technical challenges of low rectal surgery and is associated with pleasing short- and long-term results. However, its safe integration into surgical routine necessitates sufficient knowledge and a previously completed training program.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    全舌切除术和喉切除术(TGL)是一种高发病率/死亡率风险的手术,适用于晚期舌癌伴喉部浸润的病例。这项技术是有争议的,因为对生活质量有重大影响,包括失去功能性言语和吞咽。根据PRISMA指南进行系统评价,主要目标是量化接受TGL的患者的功能结局和总体生存率。最初的搜索导致748项研究;其中7项符合纳入标准。五项研究评估了术后功能性言语,在这些研究中,12.1%(8/66)的患者达到了一种功能性言语形式。大多数研究没有提到使用特定的术后语音康复。关于吞咽功能,5项研究中53.3%(32/60)的患者恢复了吞咽能力。在六项报告胃造瘘管依赖的研究中,37.7%(29/77)的患者为管依赖性。3项研究报告了1年内复发;52%(26/50)的患者在1年内复发,1年无病生存率为48%。TGL是一种高侵入性手术;术后,大多数病人没有恢复说话的能力,而只有一半能够吞咽。尽管病人做出了这些极端的努力和牺牲,大约一半的患者在第一年内复发。只有在仔细解释和权衡肿瘤和生活质量的风险和益处后,才应在选择和有动机的患者中做出执行TGL的决定。
    Total glossectomy with laryngectomy (TGL) is a procedure with high morbidity/mortality risks reserved for cases of advanced tongue cancer with laryngeal invasion. This technique is controversial as there are significant impacts on quality of life, including loss of functional speech and swallowing. A systematic review was performed following the PRISMA guidelines with the primary goal of quantifying the functional outcomes and overall survival of patients undergoing TGL. The initial search resulted in 748 studies; seven of these met the inclusion criteria. Five studies evaluated functional speech postoperatively, and 12.1% (8/66) of patients in these studies achieved a form of functional speech. Most studies did not refer to the use of specific postoperative voice rehabilitation. Regarding swallowing function, 53.3% (32/60) of patients in five studies regained their ability to swallow. In six studies reporting gastrostomy tube dependence, 37.7% (29/77) of patients were tube-dependent. Recurrence within 1-year was reported in three studies; 52% (26/50) of the patients had recurrence within 1 year, and the 1-year disease-free survival rate was 48%. TGL is a highly invasive surgery; postoperatively, most patients do not regain the ability to speak, while only half are able to swallow. Despite these extreme efforts and sacrifices by the patient, approximately half of patients have a recurrence within the first year. The decision to perform a TGL should be made only in select and motivated patients after carefully explaining and weighing the oncological and quality of life risks and benefits.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    局部肝细胞癌(HCC)的手术切除通常适用于少数具有良好肿瘤特征和解剖结构的患者。新辅助免疫疗法可以扩大接受手术切除的患者数量,并可能减少复发的机会。但其在HCC中的作用尚不明确。我们回顾性地检查了在约翰霍普金斯医院接受肝癌手术切除的患者的结果,并比较了接受新辅助免疫治疗的患者与接受前期切除的患者的临床结果。临床队列共包括92例患者,其中36人接受了基于新辅助免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)的治疗。接受基于ICI的新辅助治疗的大多数患者(61.1%)超出了标准的可切除性标准,并且更可能具有已知会导致疾病复发风险的特征。包括甲胎蛋白≥400ng/mL(P=0.02),肿瘤直径≥5cm(P=0.001),门静脉侵犯(P<0.001),多焦(P<0.001)。接受新辅助免疫治疗的患者与接受前期手术切除的患者具有相似的边缘阴性切除率(P=0.47)和无复发生存率(RFS)(中位RFS为44.8个月,与49.3个月相比,分别,对数秩P=0.66)。在新辅助免疫疗法的病理反应(肿瘤坏死≥70%)的患者亚组中,出现较好的RFS趋势并不明显。基于ICI的新辅助治疗可能允许高风险患者,包括那些超出传统可切除标准的人,达到与接受预先切除的患者相当的临床结果。
    局部HCC的手术切除通常仅保留给那些没有血管侵犯的孤立性肿瘤。在这个回顾性分析中,我们表明,新辅助免疫疗法可能允许高风险患者,包括那些在标准切除标准之外的人,成功进行切缘阴性切除术,并获得与前切除术相当的长期临床结局。这些发现强调了对HCC新辅助免疫治疗的前瞻性研究的必要性。
    Surgical resection for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is typically reserved for a minority of patients with favorable tumor features and anatomy. Neoadjuvant immunotherapy can expand the number of patients who are candidates for surgical resection and potentially reduce the chance for recurrence, but its role in HCC not defined. We retrospectively examined the outcomes of patients who underwent surgical resection for HCC at the Johns Hopkins Hospital and compared the clinical outcomes of patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy with those who underwent upfront resection. The clinical cohort included a total of 92 patients, 36 of whom received neoadjuvant immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI)-based treatment. A majority of patients (61.1%) who received neoadjuvant ICI-based therapy were outside of standard resectability criteria and were more likely to have features known to confer risk of disease recurrence, including α-fetoprotein ≥ 400 ng/mL (P = 0.02), tumor diameter ≥ 5 cm (P = 0.001), portal vein invasion (P < 0.001), and multifocality (P < 0.001). Patients who received neoadjuvant immunotherapy had similar rates of margin-negative resection (P = 0.47) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) as those who underwent upfront surgical resection (median RFS 44.8 months compared with 49.3 months, respectively, log-rank P = 0.66). There was a nonsignificant trend toward superior RFS in the subset of patients with a pathologic response (tumor necrosis ≥ 70%) with neoadjuvant immunotherapy. Neoadjuvant ICI-based therapy may allow high-risk patients, including those who are outside traditional resectability criteria, to achieve comparable clinical outcomes with those who undergo upfront resection.
    UNASSIGNED: Surgical resection for localized HCC is typically only reserved for those with solitary tumors without vascular invasion. In this retrospective analysis, we show that neoadjuvant immunotherapy may allow high-risk patients, including those who are outside of standard resection criteria, to undergo successful margin-negative resection and achieve comparable long-term clinical outcomes compared with upfront resection. These findings highlight need for prospective studies on neoadjuvant immunotherapy in HCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    胃肠道间质瘤(GIST),胃肠道中最常见的间充质肿瘤,越来越多地接受微创手术治疗。开发的技术包括腹腔镜,内窥镜,和胃GIST切除术的混合方法。我们的研究,以单切口腹腔镜胃内切除术为重点,旨在评估其安全性,功效,和长期结果。在一项涉及14例接受单切口腹腔镜胃内切除术的GIST手术的回顾性研究中,我们分析并比较了他们的术前人口统计学,美国麻醉医师协会(ASA)评分,肿瘤大小,新辅助治疗,操作持续时间,住院,有丝分裂和Ki-67指数,以及接受开放和腹腔镜楔形切除术的患者的组织学特征,评估对生存率和无病生存率的影响。平均手术时间为93.07分钟(范围81-120分钟)。平均失血量:67±20mL(范围40-110mL)。术后住院时间平均为6.79天(4-16天)。术前肿瘤大小和病理大小之间观察到强烈的相关性(P=.001,P<.001)。生存分析表明与ASA评分显著相关(P=.031),但没有有丝分裂指数,Ki-67或肿瘤大小。平均生存期为80.57个月,随访期间无复发或转移。根据我们的经验,单切口腹腔镜胃内切除术方法是一种高效的,节省时间,温和的肿瘤学程序,提供安全和微创的替代方案,从而缩短住院时间和出色的长期结局,同时复发率最低。对于更明确的结论,较大,多中心,并建议进行前瞻性研究。
    Gastrointestinal stromal tumors (GISTs), the most common mesenchymal tumors in the gastrointestinal tract, are increasingly treated with minimally invasive surgeries. Developed techniques include laparoscopic, endoscopic, and hybrid methods for gastric GIST resection. Our study, focusing on single-incision laparoscopic intragastric resection for gastric GISTs, aims to evaluate its safety, efficacy, and long-term outcomes. In a retrospective study of GIST surgery involving 14 patients who underwent single-incision laparoscopic intragastric resections, we analyzed and compared their preoperative demographics, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) scores, tumor size, neoadjuvant treatment, operation duration, hospital stay, mitotic and Ki-67 indexes, and histological features with those of patients who underwent open and laparoscopic wedge resections, to assess the impact on both survival and disease-free survival. Average operation time was 93.07 minutes (range 81-120 minutes). Average blood loss: 67 ± 20 mL (range 40-110 mL). Postoperative hospital stay averaged 6.79 days (range 4-16 days). Strong correlations were observed between preoperative and pathological tumor sizes (P = .001, P < .001). Survival analysis indicated a significant association with ASA scores (P = .031), but not with mitotic index, Ki-67, or tumor size. Average survival was 80.57 months, with no recurrence or metastasis during follow-up. Based on our experience, the single-incision laparoscopic intragastric resection method emerges as a highly efficient, timesaving, and gentle oncological procedure, providing a safe and minimally invasive alternative resulting in shorter hospital stays and excellent long-term outcomes with minimal recurrence. For more definitive conclusions, larger, multicenter, and prospective studies are recommended.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了确定可以预测FIGO2018IIICp宫颈癌(CC)患者预后的转移性淋巴结(nMLN)数量和淋巴结比率(LNR)的临界值。
    方法:接受根治性子宫切除术伴盆腔淋巴结清扫术的CC患者被确定为倾向评分匹配(PSM)队列研究。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以确定临界nMLN和LNR值。使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险回归分析比较了5年总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)。
    结果:本研究包括2004年至2018年间来自47家中国医院的3,135名FIGO2018IIICp期CC患者。基于ROC曲线分析,nMLN和LNR的截止值分别为3.5和0.11。最终队列包括nMLN≤3(n=2,378)和nMLN>3(n=757)组和LNR≤0.11(n=1,748)和LNR>0.11(n=1,387)组。nMLN≤3与nMLN>3之间的生存率存在显着差异(PSM后,操作系统:76.8%vs67.9%,P=0.003;风险比[HR]:1.411,95%置信区间[CI]:1.108-1.798,P=0.005;DFS:65.5%vs55.3%,P<0.001;HR:1.428,95%CI:1.175-1.735,P<0.001),LNR≤0.11且LNR>0.11(PSM后,操作系统:82.5%vs76.9%,P=0.010;HR:1.407,95%CI:1.103-1.794,P=0.006;DFS:72.8%vs65.1%,P=0.002;HR:1.347,95%CI:1.110-1.633,P=0.002)组。
    结论:本研究发现nMLN>3和LNR>0.11与CC患者的不良预后相关。
    BACKGROUND: To identify the cut-off values for the number of metastatic lymph nodes (nMLN) and lymph node ratio (LNR) that can predict outcomes in patients with FIGO 2018 IIICp cervical cancer (CC).
    METHODS: Patients with CC who underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy were identified for a propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort study. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the critical nMLN and LNR values. Five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses.
    RESULTS: This study included 3,135 CC patients with stage FIGO 2018 IIICp from 47 Chinese hospitals between 2004 and 2018. Based on ROC curve analysis, the cut-off values for nMLN and LNR were 3.5 and 0.11, respectively. The final cohort consisted of nMLN ≤ 3 (n = 2,378) and nMLN > 3 (n = 757) groups and LNR ≤ 0.11 (n = 1,748) and LNR > 0.11 (n = 1,387) groups. Significant differences were found in survival between the nMLN ≤ 3 vs the nMLN > 3 (post-PSM, OS: 76.8% vs 67.9%, P = 0.003; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.411, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.108-1.798, P = 0.005; DFS: 65.5% vs 55.3%, P < 0.001; HR: 1.428, 95% CI: 1.175-1.735, P < 0.001), and the LNR ≤ 0.11 and LNR > 0.11 (post-PSM, OS: 82.5% vs 76.9%, P = 0.010; HR: 1.407, 95% CI: 1.103-1.794, P = 0.006; DFS: 72.8% vs 65.1%, P = 0.002; HR: 1.347, 95% CI: 1.110-1.633, P = 0.002) groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study found that nMLN > 3 and LNR > 0.11 were associated with poor prognosis in CC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的十年中,关于根治性前列腺切除术标本中前列腺腺癌的分类和分级,遵循国际会议和有影响力的出版物达成的决定。这些改变与患者预后密切相关。
    观察这些变化的发生率及其对患者预后的影响。此外,研究组织病理学和临床参数之间的关系,以协助制定多学科治疗计划。
    回顾性队列研究。
    大学附属医院。
    苏木精和伊红,连同免疫组织化学染色的切片,被重新评估,和临床信息,包括病人的人口统计,术前PSA水平,我们收集了在我们中心接受根治性前列腺切除术的患者的随访资料.
    182名患者。
    生化复发。
    该研究强调了诸如格里森分级组,淋巴管浸润,导管内癌,手术切缘阳性,前列腺外延伸,病理T分期,和精囊侵入。这些因素是前列腺腺癌患者无复发生存的重要决定因素。
    本研究将粉刺坏死和导管内癌确定为独立的阴性预后因素。支持3毫米的阳性手术切缘,而前列腺外延伸的当前截止值可能需要重新评估。筛状模式和导管癌的影响似乎受等级组的影响。在阳性手术切缘或前列腺外延伸的Gleason评分/模式与预后之间未发现独立关系。Further,需要进行长期随访的大规模研究.
    该研究受到某些参数的患者数量相对较少的限制。
    UNASSIGNED: Over the past decade, significant updates have been made regarding the classification and grading of prostate adenocarcinoma in radical prostatectomy specimens, following decisions reached in international conferences and through impactful publications. These alterations are closely linked to patient prognosis.
    UNASSIGNED: Observe the incidence of these changes and their impact on patient prognosis. Additionally, investigate the relationship between histopathological and clinical parameters to assist in multidisciplinary treatment planning.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective cohort study.
    UNASSIGNED: Tertiary university hospital.
    UNASSIGNED: Hematoxylin and eosin, along with immunohistochemistry stained sections, were reevaluated, and clinical information, including patient demographics, preoperative PSA levels, and patient follow-up were collected from patients who underwent radical prostatectomy at our center.
    UNASSIGNED: 182 patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Biochemical recurrence.
    UNASSIGNED: The study highlighted the negative prognostic effects of factors such as Gleason grade group, lymphovascular invasion, intraductal carcinoma, positive surgical margins, extraprostatic extension, pathological T stage, and seminal vesicle invasion. These factors are important determinants of recurrence-free survival in prostate adenocarcinoma patients.
    UNASSIGNED: This study identified comedonecrosis and intraductal carcinoma as independent negative prognostic factors. A 3-mm cutoff for positive surgical margins was supported, while the current cutoff for extraprostatic extension may require reevaluation. The impact of cribriform pattern and ductal carcinoma appears to be influenced by the grade group. No independent relationship was found between the Gleason score/pattern on positive surgical margins or extraprostatic extension and prognosis. Further, large-scale studies with long-term follow-up are needed.
    UNASSIGNED: The study is limited by the relatively small number of patients for certain parameters.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在早期喉癌的治疗中,手术(经口喉部手术(TOLS),开放部分喉手术(OPLS)和放射治疗(RT)。
    比较TOLS或RT治疗的早期喉鳞状细胞癌(LSCC)患者的肿瘤学结果。
    回顾性研究。
    三级培训和研究医院。
    参与者被分为接受TOLS和RT治疗的患者。两组在局部复发方面进行比较,区域性复发,远处转移,3年和5年总生存期(OS),无病生存率(DFS),疾病特异性生存率(DSS)和无喉切除术生存率(LFS)。
    TOLS和RT治疗对局部控制的影响,区域控制,操作系统,DFS,早期喉癌的DDS和LFS。
    261。
    平均随访时间为48(26)个月。有186例患者接受了TOLS治疗,75例患者接受了RT治疗。性别,香烟/酒精消费,肿瘤定位,前连合受累,肿瘤等级,两组的复发率和复发部位相似.5年总体来说,疾病特异性,无病和无喉切除术生存率为85.9%,88%,79.4%,TOLS组的96.3%和74.3%,76.7%,72.3%,RT组为85.2%(分别为P=.034、.065、.269、.060)。
    与RT相比,TOLS在OS和DFS上的肿瘤学结果相同且良好。前连合受累是两组DFS的统计学显著独立预后危险因素。TOLS组的5年OS率更高(P=.034)。
    回顾性,但就我们所知,这是土耳其首例患者量大,随访时间长的研究.
    UNASSIGNED: In the treatment of early stage laryngeal cancers, surgery (transoral laryngeal surgery (TOLS), open partial laryngeal surgery (OPLS) and radiotherapy (RT) are used.
    UNASSIGNED: Compare the oncological results of patients with early stage laryngeal squamous cell carcinoma (LSCC) treated with TOLS or RT.
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective.
    UNASSIGNED: Tertiary training and research hospital.
    UNASSIGNED: The participants were divided into patients who underwent TOLS and RT treatment. The groups were compared with each other in terms of local recurrence, regional recurrence, distant metastasis, 3 and 5-year overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), disease-specific survival (DSS) and laryngectomy-free survival rates (LFS).
    UNASSIGNED: The effects of TOLS and RT treatment on local control, regional control, OS, DFS, DDS and LFS in early stage laryngeal cancers.
    UNASSIGNED: 261.
    UNASSIGNED: The mean follow-up time was 48 (26) months. There were 186 patients who underwent TOLS and 75 patients who underwent RT treatment. Gender, cigarette/alcohol consumption, tumor localization, anterior commissure involvement, tumor grades, recurrence rates and recurrence localizations of the groups were similar. The 5-year overall, disease specific, disease free and laryngectomy-free survival rates were 85.9%, 88%, 79.4%, 96.3% in the TOLS group and 74.3%, 76.7%, 72.3%, 85.2% in the RT group (P=.034, .065, .269, .060, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: TOLS had equal and good oncological outcomes on OS and DFS compared to RT. Anterior commissure involvement was statistically significant independent prognostic risk factor for DFS in both groups. The 5-year OS rate was greater in the TOLS groups (P=.034).
    UNASSIGNED: Retrospective, but to the best our knowledge, this is the first study in Turkey with a high patient volume and a long follow-up time.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肺癌是全球癌症相关死亡的主要原因。在各种组织学类型的肺癌中,大多数是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC),占80%以上。环状RNA(circularRNAs,circRNAs)在包括肺癌在内的各种癌症中广泛表达,并且与肿瘤发生和癌症进展有关。本研究旨在系统评估circRNAs在肺癌中的预后价值。
    方法:在PubMed中进行了系统的文献检索,Embase,和MEDLINE数据库来选择符合条件的研究,这些研究报告了组织病理学诊断的肺癌患者中circRNAs的表达与总生存期(OS)或无病生存期(DFS)之间的关联。评估合并风险比(HR)和95%置信区间(CI)以确定circRNAs的预后意义。
    结果:共有43项研究符合这项荟萃分析(MA)的条件。报告了39种不同类型的circRNAs:28种在肺癌中显示上调作用,11种显示下调作用。肺癌中具有上调作用的circRNAs的高表达与预后差和OS差相关(HR1.93,95%CI[1.61-2.33],p<0.00001)。肺癌中具有下调作用的circRNAs的高表达与良好的OS和预后相关(HR0.73,95%CI[0.58-0.94],p=0.01)。然而,上调和下调的circRNAs的高表达和低表达与DFS之间没有统计学上的显著关联(HR1.44,95%CI[0.92-2.24],p=0.11)。
    结论:该MA证实了circRNAs作为肺癌的重要预后生物标志物的关键作用,尤其是NSCLC。上调circRNAs的高表达与不良预后相关;然而,下调circRNAs的高表达与良好的预后相关。因此,circRNAs的下调作用应该被认为是治疗肺癌的一种有希望的治疗方法。尤其是NSCLC。
    BACKGROUND: Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related death worldwide. Among various histological types of lung cancer, majority are non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) which account for > 80%. Circular RNAs (circRNAs) are widely expressed in various cancers including lung cancer and implicated in tumourigenesis and cancer progression. This study aimed to systematically evaluate the prognostic values of circRNAs in lung cancer.
    METHODS: A systematic literature search was done in PubMed, Embase, and MEDLINE databases to select the eligible studies which reported the association between the expression of circRNAs and overall survival (OS) or disease-free survival (DFS) in histopathologically diagnosed lung cancer patients. The pooled hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were assessed to determine the prognostic significance of circRNAs.
    RESULTS: A total of 43 studies were eligible for this meta-analysis (MA). 39 different types of circRNAs were reported: 28 showing upregulating and 11 showing downregulating action in lung cancer. High expression of circRNAs with upregulating action in lung cancer was associated with worse prognosis and poor OS (HR 1.93, 95% CI [1.61-2.33], p < 0.00001). High expression of circRNAs with downregulating action in lung cancer was associated with favorable OS and prognosis (HR 0.73, 95% CI [0.58-0.94], p = 0.01). However, there was no statistically significant association between high and low expression of both upregulating and downregulating circRNAs and DFS (HR 1.44, 95% CI [0.92-2.24], p = 0.11).
    CONCLUSIONS: This MA confirmed the pivotal role of circRNAs as important prognostic biomarkers for lung cancer, especially NSCLC. High expression of upregulating circRNAs is associated with poor prognosis; however, high expression of downregulating circRNAs is associated with favorable prognosis. Therefore, downregulatory action of circRNAs should be considered a promising treatment in the management of lung cancer, especially NSCLC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号