disease-free survival

无病生存
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:为了确定可以预测FIGO2018IIICp宫颈癌(CC)患者预后的转移性淋巴结(nMLN)数量和淋巴结比率(LNR)的临界值。
    方法:接受根治性子宫切除术伴盆腔淋巴结清扫术的CC患者被确定为倾向评分匹配(PSM)队列研究。进行受试者工作特征(ROC)曲线分析以确定临界nMLN和LNR值。使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox比例风险回归分析比较了5年总生存率(OS)和无病生存率(DFS)。
    结果:本研究包括2004年至2018年间来自47家中国医院的3,135名FIGO2018IIICp期CC患者。基于ROC曲线分析,nMLN和LNR的截止值分别为3.5和0.11。最终队列包括nMLN≤3(n=2,378)和nMLN>3(n=757)组和LNR≤0.11(n=1,748)和LNR>0.11(n=1,387)组。nMLN≤3与nMLN>3之间的生存率存在显着差异(PSM后,操作系统:76.8%vs67.9%,P=0.003;风险比[HR]:1.411,95%置信区间[CI]:1.108-1.798,P=0.005;DFS:65.5%vs55.3%,P<0.001;HR:1.428,95%CI:1.175-1.735,P<0.001),LNR≤0.11且LNR>0.11(PSM后,操作系统:82.5%vs76.9%,P=0.010;HR:1.407,95%CI:1.103-1.794,P=0.006;DFS:72.8%vs65.1%,P=0.002;HR:1.347,95%CI:1.110-1.633,P=0.002)组。
    结论:本研究发现nMLN>3和LNR>0.11与CC患者的不良预后相关。
    BACKGROUND: To identify the cut-off values for the number of metastatic lymph nodes (nMLN) and lymph node ratio (LNR) that can predict outcomes in patients with FIGO 2018 IIICp cervical cancer (CC).
    METHODS: Patients with CC who underwent radical hysterectomy with pelvic lymphadenectomy were identified for a propensity score-matched (PSM) cohort study. A receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the critical nMLN and LNR values. Five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) rates were compared using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazard regression analyses.
    RESULTS: This study included 3,135 CC patients with stage FIGO 2018 IIICp from 47 Chinese hospitals between 2004 and 2018. Based on ROC curve analysis, the cut-off values for nMLN and LNR were 3.5 and 0.11, respectively. The final cohort consisted of nMLN ≤ 3 (n = 2,378) and nMLN > 3 (n = 757) groups and LNR ≤ 0.11 (n = 1,748) and LNR > 0.11 (n = 1,387) groups. Significant differences were found in survival between the nMLN ≤ 3 vs the nMLN > 3 (post-PSM, OS: 76.8% vs 67.9%, P = 0.003; hazard ratio [HR]: 1.411, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.108-1.798, P = 0.005; DFS: 65.5% vs 55.3%, P < 0.001; HR: 1.428, 95% CI: 1.175-1.735, P < 0.001), and the LNR ≤ 0.11 and LNR > 0.11 (post-PSM, OS: 82.5% vs 76.9%, P = 0.010; HR: 1.407, 95% CI: 1.103-1.794, P = 0.006; DFS: 72.8% vs 65.1%, P = 0.002; HR: 1.347, 95% CI: 1.110-1.633, P = 0.002) groups.
    CONCLUSIONS: This study found that nMLN > 3 and LNR > 0.11 were associated with poor prognosis in CC patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:最近的一项试验表明,绝经后女性被诊断为激素受体阳性,人表皮生长因子受体2(HER2)阴性,21基因复发评分≤25的淋巴结阳性(1-3个)乳腺癌可以安全地省略化疗。然而,在现实世界的实践中,在不同女性中,与省略化疗相关的人群水平长期结局数据有限.
    方法:我们调整了既定的,验证的模拟模型,以生成在美国诊断患有早期乳腺癌的妇女的人口水平特征的联合分布输入参数来自癌症登记,荟萃分析,和临床试验数据。省略化疗对10年无远处复发生存率的影响,生命年,对绝经前和绝经后妇女进行质量调整生命年(QALYs)建模.QALY折扣率为3%。根据种族和种族分层的亚组评估结果。敏感性分析包括一系列输入的测试结果。使用已发布的RxPONDER试验数据验证了该模型。
    结果:在绝经前妇女中,化疗-内分泌治疗的10年无远处复发生存率为85.3%,内分泌治疗为80.1%.绝经前妇女化疗后获得的估计生命年和QALYs分别为2.1和0.6。绝经后妇女没有化疗益处。在不同种族或种族亚组之间,化疗的绝对益处没有差异。然而,远处无复发生存率有差异,生命年,和跨群体的QALY。敏感性分析结果相似。该模型紧密复制了RxPONDER试验。
    结论:模拟人群水平的结果显示,绝经前妇女的化疗获益较小,但对绝经后妇女没有益处。仿真建模提供了一个有用的工具来扩展试验数据和评估人群水平的结果。
    BACKGROUND: A recent trial showed that postmenopausal women diagnosed with hormone receptor-positive, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER2)-negative, lymph node-positive (1-3 nodes) breast cancer with a 21-gene recurrence score of ≤ 25 could safely omit chemotherapy. However, there are limited data on population-level long-term outcomes associated with omitting chemotherapy among diverse women seen in real-world practice.
    METHODS: We adapted an established, validated simulation model to generate the joint distributions of population-level characteristics of women diagnosed with early-stage breast cancer in the U.S. Input parameters were derived from cancer registry, meta-analyses, and clinical trial data. The effects of omitting chemotherapy on 10-year distant recurrence-free survival, life-years, and quality adjusted life-years (QALYs) were modeled for premenopausal and postmenopausal women. QALYs were discounted at 3%. Results were evaluated for subgroups stratified by race and ethnicity. Sensitivity analyses included testing results across a range of inputs. The model was validated using the published RxPONDER trial data.
    RESULTS: In premenopausal women, the 10-year distant recurrence-free survival rates were 85.3% with chemo-endocrine and 80.1% with endocrine therapy. The estimated life-years and QALYs gained with chemotherapy in premenopausal women were 2.1 and 0.6, respectively. There was no chemotherapy benefit in postmenopausal women. There was no variation in the absolute benefit of chemotherapy across racial or ethnic subgroups. However, there were differences in distant recurrence-free survival rates, life-years, and QALYs across groups. Sensitivity analysis showed similar results. The model closely replicated the RxPONDER trial.
    CONCLUSIONS: Modeled population-level outcomes show a small chemotherapy benefit in premenopausal women, but no benefit among postmenopausal women. Simulation modeling provides a useful tool to extend trial data and evaluate population-level outcomes.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:研究盆腔放疗对复发性宫颈癌患者化疗期间骨髓抑制的影响。方法和材料:对129例复发性宫颈癌患者进行回顾性分析,其中77例有盆腔放疗史,52例无盆腔放疗史的患者作为对照组。所有患者接受紫杉醇联合卡铂(TC)化疗方案,每21天5-6次。血液毒性,包括红细胞计数,白细胞和中性粒细胞和血小板,使用不良事件通用术语标准(4.0版)定义。年龄之间的关系,身体质量指数,无病生存,病理类型,FIGO阶段,放疗方式及化疗期间骨髓抑制程度进行统计学分析,分别,所有复发性宫颈癌患者。结果:77例有放疗史的患者中,73例复发患者(94.8%)出现骨髓抑制,然后进行化疗。未经放疗的复发性宫颈癌患者(n=52)在化疗后出现骨髓抑制的风险较低(n=39,75.0%,P<0.05)。有或没有放疗史的复发性宫颈患者化疗后出现严重骨髓抑制(Ⅲ~Ⅳ级)的概率分别为41.6%和13.5%,分别为(P<0.05)。在单变量分析中,放疗方法与复发性宫颈癌患者III-IV级骨髓抑制发生率相关(P=0.005).在多变量分析中,放疗方式和扩展视野放疗是III-IV级骨髓抑制的危险因素(χ2=16.975,P=0.001)。白细胞计数无显著差异,观察有和没有放疗的患者在化疗前复发时的血红蛋白和血小板。白细胞计数减少,中性粒细胞和血小板计数的绝对值复合大多数类型的III和IV级骨髓抑制。结论:既往盆腔放疗可显著增加复发宫颈癌患者化疗期间骨髓抑制的发生率。在治疗复发的宫颈癌患者时,化疗前放疗,特别是对于那些有经验的外部束放射治疗,建议给予必要的关注和及时的干预,以确保完成化疗和临床疗效。
    Purpose: To study the effects of prior pelvic radiotherapy on bone marrow suppression in recurrent cervical cancer patients during chemotherapy. Methods and materials: The cases of 129 patients with recurrent cervical cancer were reviewed, of which 77 patients had pelvic radiotherapy history and another 52 patients with no pelvic radiotherapy history were used as control group. All patients received a chemotherapy regimen of paclitaxel combined with carboplatin (TC) per 21 days for 5-6 times. Hematologic toxicity, including count of red blood cell, white blood cell and neutrophil cell and platelet, was defined by using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.0). The relationship between age, body mass index, disease free survival, pathological types, FIGO stages, radiotherapy methods and the degree of bone marrow suppression during chemotherapy was statistically analyzed, respectively, for all recurrent cervical cancer patients. Results: Among 77 patients with previous radiotherapy history, 73 recurrent patients (94.8%) had bone marrow suppression followed by chemotherapy. Recurrent cervical cancer patients without prior radiotherapy (n=52) showed a lower risk of bone marrow suppression followed by chemotherapy (n=39, 75.0%, P < 0.05). The probability of severe bone marrow suppression (grade III-IV) after chemotherapy in recurrent cervical patients with or without history of radiotherapy was 41.6% and 13.5%, respectively (P < 0.05). In univariate analysis, radiotherapy methods were associated with the incidence of grade III-IV bone marrow suppression in recurrent cervical cancer patients (P=0.005). In multivariate analysis, radiotherapy methods and extended-field radiotherapy were the risk factor of grade III-IV bone marrow suppression (χ2=16.975, P=0.001). No significant differences in the counts of white blood cell, hemoglobin and platelet were observed before chemotherapy at relapse between patients with and without prior radiotherapy. Reduction of white blood cell counts, absolute value of neutrophil cell and platelet counts composited majority type of grade III and IV bone marrow suppression. Conclusions: The prior pelvic radiotherapy significantly increased the incidence of bone marrow suppression during chemotherapy in recurrent cervical cancer patients. When treating recurrent cervical cancer patients with chemotherapy who had prior radiotherapy, especially for those experienced external beam radiation therapy, essential attention and timely intervention are recommended to ensure completion of chemotherapy and clinical efficacy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:以纵隔淋巴结清扫为重点,评价电视胸腔镜手术(VATS)与开胸手术治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的疗效和安全性。术后恢复,和长期结果,包括生存率和无病间隔。材料和方法:这项回顾性研究分析了2016年至2022年在布加勒斯特肿瘤研究所治疗的228例NSCLC患者的数据。比较了VATS和开放手术入路,变量包括人口统计数据,合并症,手术结果,并精心记录术后并发症。使用卡方和独立样本t检验评估统计显著性。结果:在调查结果中,与开放手术相比,VATS在NSCLC早期(1-3期)患者的两年无进展生存率显着提高。p值分别为0.01和0.001。相比之下,在第4阶段没有观察到显著差异。此外,VATS导致手术时间更短(平均299与347分钟,p0.001),估计失血较少(98.68毫升与160.88毫升,p0.001),胸管持续时间减少(5.78天vs.12.17天,p0.001),住院时间减少(12.0天vs.27.7天,p0.001)。结论:VATS与改善早期NSCLC的长期无病生存率和更有利的短期手术结果相关。突出了它比开胸手术的优势。尽管有好处,与开放手术相比,VATS并未显着减少术后并发症。
    OBJECTIVE: The efficacy and safety of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) versus open thoracotomy in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) were evaluated with a focus on mediastinal lymph node dissection, postoperative recovery, and longterm outcomes including survival rates and disease-free intervals. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study analyzed data from 228 NSCLC patients treated at the Institute of Oncology Bucharest from 2016 to 2022. Both VATS and open surgical approaches were compared, with variables including demographic data, comorbidities, surgical outcomes, and postoperative complications meticulously recorded. Statistical significance was assessed using chi-square and independent samples t-tests. Results: Among the findings, VATS demonstrated significantly better two-year progression-free survival rates for patients in early stages (Stages 1-3) of NSCLC compared to open surgery, with p-values 0.01 and 0.001, respectively. In contrast, no significant difference was observed in Stage 4. Furthermore, VATS resulted in shorter operative times (mean 299 vs. 347 minutes, p 0.001), less estimated blood loss (98.68 mL vs. 160.88 mL, p 0.001), reduced chest tube duration (5.78 days vs. 12.17 days, p 0.001), and decreased hospital stays (12.0 days vs. 27.7 days, p 0.001). Conclusions: VATS is associated with improved long-term disease-free survival for early-stage NSCLC and more favorable short-term surgical outcomes, highlighting its advantages over open thoracotomy. Despite its benefits, VATS did not significantly reduce postoperative complications compared to open surgery.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:化生性乳腺癌(BC-Mp)是一种罕见的亚型,具有独特的挑战。关于患者预后和治疗策略的有限信息激发了我们的研究计划。我们旨在评估无病生存率(DFS),总生存期(OS),非转移性BC-Mp患者的影响因素。
    方法:在这项多中心回顾性队列研究中,收集了在波兰4个肿瘤科(2012-2022年)接受治疗的非转移性BC-Mp患者的临床病理数据。
    结果:在115名妇女中(中位年龄61,范围:28-91),中位肿瘤大小为40mm(范围20-130);30%的患者显示局部淋巴结阳性.大多数患者表现为II期(46%)和三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)(84%)。61%的患者接受了放射治疗。手术包括31%的患者进行保乳手术,68%的患者进行乳房切除术。83%的患者接受化疗。估计的DFS和OS的中位数分别为59个月和68个月,分别。多变量分析显示,肿瘤大小影响DFS和OS(两个终点的危害比[HR]=1.02,95CI0.01-0.03),紫杉烷类药物的应用改善了DFS(HR=0.47,95CI0.24-0.93),但其他因素没有。对于接受新辅助系统治疗的患者(N=51),紫杉类药物根据单变量分析改进了DFS和OS。
    结论:我们的研究结果突出了DFS和OS差,无论是否接受最佳治疗,强调BC-Mp患者需要量身定制的治疗策略。紫杉烷在新辅助治疗中似乎很有希望,特别是在目前的TNBC亚型护理标准内。
    OBJECTIVE: Metaplastic breast carcinoma (BC-Mp) is an uncommon subtype that poses unique challenges. The limited information on patient prognosis and therapeutic strategies motivated our research initiative. We aimed to assess disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and influential factors in patients with nonmetastatic BC-Mp.
    METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective cohort study, clinicopathological data for nonmetastatic BC-Mp patients treated at four oncology units in Poland (2012-2022) were gathered.
    RESULTS: Among 115 women (median age 61, range: 28-91), the median tumor size was 40 mm (range 20-130); 30% of patients exhibited positive local lymph nodes. The majority of patients presented with stage II (46%) and triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) (84%). Radiotherapy was administered to 61% of patients. Surgical procedures included breast-conserving surgery in 31% of patients and mastectomy in 68%. Eighty-three per cent of patients received chemotherapy. The median estimated DFS and OS were 59 and 68 months, respectively. Multivariable analysis revealed that tumor size influenced DFS and OS (Hazard ratios [HR] = 1.02, 95%CI 0.01-0.03 for both endpoints) and taxanes application improved DFS (HR = 0.47, 95%CI 0.24-0.93), but other factors did not. For patients receiving neoadjuvant systemic therapy (N = 51), taxanes improved DFS and OS according to univariable analysis.
    CONCLUSIONS: Our findings highlight poor DFS and OS regardless of receiving optimal treatment, emphasizing the need for tailored therapeutic strategies for BC-Mp patients. Taxanes appear promising in a neoadjuvant setting, particularly within the current standard of care for the TNBC subtype.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:使用国家数据验证活体肝移植治疗肝细胞癌的扩展标准非常重要。这项研究的目的是评估日本新的肝细胞癌患者活体肝移植标准的有效性,并使用日本国家数据集确定与预后不良相关的因素。
    方法:研究人群包括2010年至2018年在日本37个中心接受肝细胞癌活体肝移植的患者。在一项全国性的调查中,在将适应症扩展到米兰标准之外时,根据日本新的5-5-500规则应用标准评估了总生存率和无复发生存率.使用Cox比例风险模型确定日本标准中的预后因素。
    结果:日本标准的患者(485例)和以上(31例)的5年总生存率分别为81%和58%,5年无复发生存率分别为77%和48%。符合米兰标准的病人,但不是5-5-500法则,结果较差。对474例患者进行多因素分析,发现中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率大于或等于5,并且肝切除术史是独立的危险因素。
    结论:这项全国性调查证实了日本标准的有效性。日本标准中的不良预后因素包括中性粒细胞与淋巴细胞的比率大于或等于5和先前的肝切除术。
    BACKGROUND: Validating the expanded criteria for living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma using national data is highly significant. The aim of this study was to evaluate the validity of the new Japanese criteria for living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma patients and identify factors associated with a poor prognosis using the Japanese national data set.
    METHODS: The study population comprised patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma at 37 centres in Japan between 2010 and 2018. In a nationwide survey, the overall survival and recurrence-free survival rates were evaluated based on the new Japanese criteria for applying the 5-5-500 rule when extending the indication beyond the Milan criteria. Prognostic factors within the Japanese criteria were determined using the Cox proportional hazards model.
    RESULTS: Patients within (485 patients) and beyond (31 patients) the Japanese criteria exhibited 5-year overall survival rates of 81% and 58% and 5-year recurrence-free survival rates of 77% and 48% respectively. Patients who met the Milan criteria, but not the 5-5-500 rule, had poorer outcomes. Multivariate analysis for 474 patients identified a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio greater than or equal to 5 and a history of hepatectomy as independent risk factors.
    CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide survey confirms the validity of the Japanese criteria. The poor prognostic factors within the Japanese criteria include a neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio greater than or equal to 5 and previous hepatectomy.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    需要强有力的辅助策略来改善具有完全切除的ΙΙΙΙΑ期非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的患者的存活。我们旨在比较这些患者的中医(TCM)治疗与辅助化疗后观察的疗效。
    符合条件的患者按1:1随机分组,分别接受气阴辨证口服汤剂(中医组)或观察组(观察组)。干预持续了12个月。主要终点是1年无病生存期(DFS)。次要终点是DFS,生活质量,调节性T细胞(Tregs),和外周血Tregs表面的细胞毒性T淋巴细胞相关抗原-4(CTLA-4)。我们使用EORTCQLQ-LC43评估生活质量。
    在2019年4月29日至2021年11月11日之间,根据气阴辨证(n=38)或观察(n=37),将75例患者随机分配到口服汤剂。全分析集包括中医组35例,观察组35例。在中位随访24.2个月后,与观察相比,基于气阴辨证的口服汤剂改善了DFS(HR0.378,95%CI:0.157-0.912;P=0.03)。中医组1年DFS为82.1%,观察组为61.9%(P=.06)。随机化后三个月,总体健康评分,角色功能,情感功能,中医组的社会功能高于观察组(P<0.01),分数的疲劳,疼痛,失眠,食欲减退,便秘,咳嗽,而胸痛低于观察组(均P<.05);中医组Tregs比例与观察组比较差异无统计学意义(P=.58);中医组CTLA-4+Tregs比例低于观察组(P=.046)。两组均未发生不良事件。
    辅助化疗后基于气阴辨证的口服汤剂延长DFS,降低疾病复发和转移的风险,提高生活质量,并下调完全切除的III期NSCLC患者中CTLA-4+Treg的比例。
    中国临床试验注册,不。ChiCTR1800019396。注册日期:2018年11月9日。
    UNASSIGNED: Powerful adjuvant strategies are required to improve the survival of patients with completely resected stage ΙΙΙA non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We aimed to compare the efficacy of traditional Chinese medicine (TCM) treatment versus observation after adjuvant chemotherapy in these patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Eligible patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either oral decoctions based on Qi-Yin syndrome differentiation (TCM group) or observation (observation group). The intervention lasted for 12 months. The primary endpoint was 1-year disease-free survival (DFS). Secondary endpoints were DFS, quality of life, regulatory T cells (Tregs), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4) on the surface of Tregs in peripheral blood. We used EORTC QLQ-LC43 to evaluate quality of life.
    UNASSIGNED: Between Apr 29, 2019, and Nov 11, 2021, 75 patients were randomly assigned to oral decoctions based on Qi-Yin syndrome differentiation (n = 38) or observation (n = 37). The full analysis set included 35 patients in the TCM group and 35 in the observation group. After a median follow-up of 24.2 months, oral decoctions based on Qi-Yin syndrome differentiation improved DFS compared with observation (HR 0.378, 95% CI: 0.157-0.912; P = .03). One-year DFS was 82.1% in the TCM group and 61.9% in the observation group (P = .06). Three months after randomization, scores of total health, role function, emotional function, and social function in the TCM group were higher than those in the observation group (P < .01 for all), scores of fatigue, pain, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, cough, and chest pain were lower than those in the observation group (P < .05 for all); there was no significant difference in the proportion of Tregs between the TCM group and the observation group (P = .58); the proportion of CTLA-4+Tregs in the TCM group was lower than that in the observation group (P = .046). There were no adverse events that occurred in both groups.
    UNASSIGNED: Oral decoctions based on Qi-Yin syndrome differentiation after adjuvant chemotherapy prolonged DFS, reduced the risk of disease recurrence and metastasis, improved quality of life, and down-regulated the proportion of CTLA-4+Tregs in completely resected stage ΙΙΙA NSCLC patients.
    UNASSIGNED: Chinese Clinical Trial Register, No. ChiCTR1800019396. Date of registration: 9 November 2018.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝细胞癌是世界范围内的高致死性肿瘤,而中国的发病率和死亡率也相应较高。对于不可切除的肝细胞癌患者,预后往往较差。这项回顾性研究的目的是研究转换疗法对这些患者的影响。
    方法:该研究纳入了18至75岁的患者,这些患者最初被诊断为不可切除的肝细胞癌,并接受了转化治疗。完成手术后,患者接受了病理诊断,显示完全坏死。这项研究是在第一附属医院进行的回顾性研究,浙江大学医学院,从2019年1月到2021年12月。该研究的主要目标是评估总生存期和无复发生存期。
    结果:共纳入60例符合纳入标准的患者。患者的中位年龄为56.6±9.5岁,其中85%是男性。1年总生存率(OS)为98.3%,三年OS为95.6%。1年无复发生存率(RFS)为81.1%,三年RFS为71.4%。在亚组分析中,BCLC0-A期和BCLCB-C期患者的RFS差异无统计学意义(p=0.296).此外,接受术后新辅助治疗的患者和未接受术后新辅助治疗的患者的RFS无统计学差异(p=0.324).
    结论:转换治疗后手术切除可能是最初不可切除的肝细胞癌患者的有希望的治疗方法。预后良好,病理完全缓解。
    BACKGROUND: Hepatocellular carcinoma is a highly lethal tumor worldwide, and China has a correspondingly high incidence and mortality rate. For patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, the prognosis is often poor. The objective of this retrospective study was to investigate the effects of conversion therapies on these patients.
    METHODS: The study included patients between the ages of 18 and 75 who were initially diagnosed with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma and received conversion therapy. After completing surgery, the patients underwent pathological diagnosis, which showed complete necrosis. The study was conducted retrospectively at the First Affiliated Hospital, Zhejiang University School of Medicine, from January 2019 to December 2021. The main objectives of the study were to evaluate the overall survival and recurrence-free survival.
    RESULTS: A total of 60 patients who met the inclusion criteria were enrolled. The median age of the patients was 56.6 ± 9.5 years, and 85% of them were male. The one-year overall survival rate (OS) was 98.3%, and the three-year OS was 95.6%. The one-year recurrence-free survival rate (RFS) was 81.1%, and the three-year RFS was 71.4%. In subgroup analysis, there was no statistically significant difference in RFS between patients with BCLC stages 0-A and BCLC stages B-C (p = 0.296). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in RFS between patients who received postoperative new adjuvant therapy and those who did not (p = 0.324).
    CONCLUSIONS: Conversion therapy followed by surgical resection could be a promising treatment for patients with initially unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma, and the prognosis is good with a pathological complete response.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    尽管机器人手术对乙状结肠和直肠癌患者的安全性和短期结果是有据可查的,关于机器人结直肠手术的长期生存结局的研究有限.这是一项回顾性研究,包括在2016年8月至2021年9月期间接受腹腔镜或机器人前切除术和腹部手术切除直肠或乙状结肠癌的502例患者。所有患者均诊断为直肠或乙状结肠腺癌。实施倾向得分匹配(PSM)以最小化选择偏差。围手术期结果,并发症发生率,和病理资料进行评价和比较。计算并比较5年总生存率和无病生存率。匹配之前,与腹腔镜组相比,机器人组患者的病理T和N分期较早,并且更有可能接受新辅助放化疗.匹配后,两组的大多数临床病理结果相似,但与腹腔镜组相比,机器人组手术时间更长,开腹手术的转化率更低.匹配临床因素后,机器人组5年DFS率为88.19%,腹腔镜组为82.46%(P=0.122),OS率分别为90.5%和79.5%(P=0.342),没有显着差异。在分层分析中,机器人手术组的患者在以下亚组中的5年DFS率明显较高:TNMI-II期,接受新辅助治疗,原发肿瘤位于直肠。与腹腔镜手术相比,机器人手术治疗乙状结肠和直肠癌的安全性和有效性得到了验证。两组患者的长期预后相当。
    Although the safety and short-term outcomes of robotic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer patients are well-documented, there is limited research on the long-term survival outcomes of robotic colorectal surgery. This is a retrospective study that includes 502 patients who underwent either laparoscopic or robotic anterior resection and abdominoperineal resection for rectal or sigmoid colon cancer between August 2016 and September 2021. All patients were diagnosed with rectal or sigmoid colon adenocarcinoma. Propensity score matching (PSM) was implemented to minimize selection bias. Perioperative outcomes, complication rates, and pathological data were evaluated and compared. The 5-year overall survival rate and disease-free survival rate were calculated and compared. Before matching, patients in the robotic group had earlier pathological T and N stages and were more likely to have received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy compared to the laparoscopic group. After matching, most clinicopathological outcomes were similar between the two groups, but the robotic group had longer operative times and a lower conversion rate to open surgery compared with laparoscopic group. After matching for clinical factors, the 5-year DFS rates were 88.19% for the robotic group and 82.46% for the laparoscopic group (P = 0.122), and the OS rates were 90.5% and 79.5% (P = 0.342), showing no significant differences. In the stratified analysis, patients in the robotic surgery group had significantly higher 5-year DFS rates in the following subgroups: age < 65 years, TNM stage I-II, received neoadjuvant therapy, and primary tumor located in the rectum. The safety and efficacy of robotic surgery for sigmoid colon and rectal cancer were validated compared to laparoscopic surgery, with both groups of patients exhibiting comparable long-term prognoses.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:开发并验证基于T2加权磁共振成像(MRI)的影像组学特征与局部晚期宫颈癌的无病生存期(DFS)相关。
    方法:该研究包括132名患者的训练数据集(93挪威人;39癌症成像档案(TCIA)和199名接受放化疗治疗的FIGOIB-IVA期宫颈癌患者的独立验证加拿大数据集。使用PyRadiomics提取放射学特征。基于使用训练数据集建立的DFS的多变量放射学预后模型,开发了放射学签名,最小冗余最大相关性特征选择方法。然后进行单变量和多变量Cox回归分析以检查衍生的放射学组学特征与DFS的关联。
    结果:在训练队列中,影像组学特征是DFS的预后(挪威风险比[HR]5.54,p=0.002;TCIAHR3.59,p=0.04)。当针对分期和肿瘤体积进行调整时,影像组学特征保持与DFS独立相关(HR3.70,p=0.004)。在验证队列中,影像组学特征也是DFS的预后,均进行单变量分析(HR2.22,p=0.003),和多变量分析调整分期和肿瘤体积(HR1.84,p=0.04)。影像组学特征评分>0和≤0的患者的4年DFS率分别为48.2%和87.9%,训练和验证队列分别为56.4%和80.8%。
    结论:在接受放化疗的局部晚期宫颈癌患者中,基于MRI的影像组学特征可作为DFS的预后生物标志物。
    BACKGROUND: To develop and validate a T2-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based radiomic signature associated with disease-free survival (DFS) in locally advanced cervical cancer.
    METHODS: The study comprised a training dataset of 132 patients (93 Norwegian; 39 The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA) and an independent validation Canadian dataset of 199 patients with FIGO stage IB-IVA cervical cancer treated with chemoradiation. Radiomic features were extracted using PyRadiomics. A radiomic signature was developed based on a multivariable radiomic prognostic model for DFS built using the training dataset, with minimal redundancy maximum relevancy feature selection method. Univariate and multivariable Cox regression analyses were then conducted to examine the association of the derived radiomic signature with DFS.
    RESULTS: A radiomic signature was prognostic for DFS in the training cohort (Norwegian hazard ratio [HR] 5.54, p = 0.002; TCIA HR 3.59, p = 0.04). The radiomic signature remained independently associated with DFS (HR 3.70, p = 0.004) when adjusted for stage and tumor volume. The radiomic signature was also prognostic for DFS in the validation cohort, both on univariate analysis (HR 2.22, p = 0.003), and multivariable analysis adjusted for stage and tumor volume (HR 1.84, p = 0.04). The 4-year DFS rates of patients with radiomic signature score > 0 vs ≤ 0 were 48.2 % vs 87.9 %, and 56.4 % vs 80.8 % for training and validation cohorts respectively.
    CONCLUSIONS: An MRI-based radiomic signature can be used as a prognostic biomarker for DFS in patients with locally advanced cervical cancer undergoing chemoradiation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号