direct thrombin inhibitor

直接凝血酶抑制剂
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    可注射抗凝剂广泛用于医疗程序中以防止不需要的血液凝固。然而,许多人缺乏安全,有效的逆转剂。这里,我们提供了关于先前描述的基于RNA折纸的新数据,直接凝血酶抑制剂(HEX01)。我们描述了一个新的,快速行动,具体,单分子逆转剂(解毒剂),并首次提供体内数据,包括功效,可逆性,初步安全,和初步的生物分布研究。HEX01包含附加在RNA折纸上的多个结合凝血酶的适体。它在体外和体内表现出优异的抗凝血活性。新的单分子,DNA解毒剂(HEX02)在体外30秒内逆转人血浆中HEX01的抗凝活性,并且在鼠肝裂伤模型中有效地起作用。使用离体成像的HEX01在整个小鼠中的生物分布研究显示,在24小时内主要在肝脏中积累,并且在肾脏中浓度降低10倍。此外,我们显示HEX01/HEX02系统对上皮细胞系无细胞毒性且在体外无溶血性。此外,我们在小鼠模型中没有发现血清细胞因子对HEX01/HEX02的反应。HEX01和HEX02代表安全有效的凝血控制系统,具有快速作用,特定的逆转剂显示出潜在药物开发的希望。
    Injectable anticoagulants are widely used in medical procedures to prevent unwanted blood clotting. However, many lack safe, effective reversal agents. Here, we present new data on a previously described RNA origami-based, direct thrombin inhibitor (HEX01). We describe a new, fast-acting, specific, single-molecule reversal agent (antidote) and present in vivo data for the first time, including efficacy, reversibility, preliminary safety, and initial biodistribution studies. HEX01 contains multiple thrombin-binding aptamers appended on an RNA origami. It exhibits excellent anticoagulation activity in vitro and in vivo. The new single-molecule, DNA antidote (HEX02) reverses anticoagulation activity of HEX01 in human plasma within 30 s in vitro and functions effectively in a murine liver laceration model. Biodistribution studies of HEX01 in whole mice using ex vivo imaging show accumulation mainly in the liver over 24 h and with 10-fold lower concentrations in the kidneys. Additionally, we show that the HEX01/HEX02 system is non-cytotoxic to epithelial cell lines and non-hemolytic in vitro. Furthermore, we found no serum cytokine response to HEX01/HEX02 in a murine model. HEX01 and HEX02 represent a safe and effective coagulation control system with a fast-acting, specific reversal agent showing promise for potential drug development.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    直接口服抗凝剂(DOACs)通过直接抑制因子Xa(利伐沙班,阿哌沙班,和edoxaban)或凝血酶(达比加群)。尽管DOAC的特点是固定剂量处方,通常不需要常规实验室药物水平监测(DLM),可能出现DLM可能有助于临床决策的情况,包括DOAC剂量调整,抗凝剂类改变,或决定扣留或管理逆转代理人。我们回顾了目前描述高风险患者群体的文献,其中DLM可能有利于改善患者抗凝管理和管理。该综述还总结了常规凝血测试的局限性,并讨论了定量方法对DOAC药物水平的常规和快速紧急评估的新兴效用-特别是,检测因子Xa抑制剂的抗Xa活性(利伐沙班,阿哌沙班,和edoxaban)。广泛实施DLM的技术和监管障碍都是必须克服的进一步临床研究的限制因素。为了提出通用的DOACDLM策略,并提供临床-实验室相关性以正式对高危患者组进行分类。
    Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) exert anticoagulation effect by directly inhibiting Factor Xa (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban) or thrombin (dabigatran). Though DOACs are characterized by fixed-dose prescribing and generally do not require routine laboratory drug-level monitoring (DLM), circumstances may arise where the DLM may aid in clinical decision-making, including DOAC dose adjustment, anticoagulant class change, or decisions to withhold or administer reversal agents. We review the current literature that describes high-risk patient groups in which DLM may be beneficial for improved patient anticoagulation management and stewardship. The review also summarizes the limitations of conventional coagulation testing and discuss the emerging utility of quantitative methods for routine and rapid emergent evaluation of DOAC drug levels-in particular, the Anti-Xa activity to detect Factor Xa Inhibitors (rivaroxaban, apixaban, and edoxaban). Both technical and regulatory barriers to widespread DLM implementation are limiting factors to further clinical research that must be overcome, in order to propose universal DOAC DLM strategies and provide clinical-laboratory correlation to formally classify high-risk patient groups.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    •尽管有标准的肝素抗凝方案,但COVID-19的回路血栓形成会使CRRT复杂化。•5例CRRT血栓形成,尽管使用直接凝血酶抑制剂以肝素为基础的抗凝治疗,阿加曲班。•纤维蛋白原水平的变化比D-二聚体水平的变化更好地反映抗凝反应。•在这些情况下,高纤维蛋白原水平和抗凝血酶III活性降低可能与阿加曲班优势有关。
    •Circuit thrombosis complicates CRRT in COVID-19 despite standard heparin-based anticoagulation regimens.•5 cases of CRRT thrombosis despite heparin-based anticoagulation resolved using a direct thrombin inhibitor, argatroban.•Changes in fibrinogen levels better reflected response to anticoagulation than did changes in D-dimer levels.•High fibrinogen levels and decreased anti-thrombin III activity may relate to argatroban superiority in these cases.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    直接凝血酶抑制剂,包括阿加曲班,越来越多地用于静脉体外膜氧合(VVECMO)期间的抗凝治疗。在许多中心,活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)用于监测,但它可能会受到几个混杂因素的影响。这项研究的目的是评估根据稀释的凝血酶时间目标(hemoclot™测定)滴定的阿加曲班抗凝的安全性和有效性,与使用普通肝素(UFH)的抗Xa指导抗凝相比。
    方法:这项队列研究包括两个三级护理中心的成年人,他们需要VVECMO治疗严重的COVID-19相关急性呼吸窘迫综合征(CARDS)。患者在ECMO期间接受中心依赖性阿加曲班或UFH抗凝治疗。遵循0.4-0.6μg/ml的hemoclot™目标范围指导阿加曲班。UFH以抗因子Xa(antiXa)水平(0.2-0.3IU/ml)为指导。主要结果是与UFH相比,阿加曲班的安全性,根据ECMO期间首次发生临床相关出血事件或死亡的时间进行评估.次要结果包括疗效(血栓栓塞时间)和可行性(范围内的抗凝目标比例)。
    结果:从2019年到2021年,57名患者被纳入研究,其中27名患者(47%)接受阿加曲班,30名患者(53%)接受UFH。两组之间在ECMO期间首次临床相关出血或死亡的时间相似(HR(argatrobanvs.UFH):1.012,95%CI0.44-2.35,p=0.978)。与UFH相比,阿加曲班与血栓栓塞风险降低相关(HR0.494(95%CI0.26-0.95;p=0.034))。目标范围内的抗凝治疗的总体比例在组间没有差异(46%(23-54%)与46%(37%-57%),p=0.45)。
    结论:根据hemoclot™目标(0.4-0.6μg/ml)使用阿加曲班进行抗凝治疗与antiXa指导的UFH(0.2-0.3IU/ml)相比是安全的,并且可能会延长需要VVECMO的严重ARDS患者的无血栓栓塞时间。
    Direct thrombin inhibitors, including argatroban, are increasingly used for anticoagulation during venovenous extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VV ECMO). In many centers activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT) is used for monitoring, but it can be affected by several confounders. The aim of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of anticoagulation with argatroban titrated according to diluted thrombin time targets (hemoclot™ assay) compared to anti-Xa guided anticoagulation with unfractionated heparin (UFH).
    METHODS: This cohort study included adults at two tertiary care centers who required VV ECMO for severe COVID-19-related acute respiratory distress syndrome (CARDS). Patients received center-dependent argatroban or UFH for anticoagulation during ECMO. Argatroban was guided following a hemoclot™ target range of 0.4-0.6 μg/ml. UFH was guided by anti-factor Xa (antiXa) levels (0.2-0.3 IU/ml). The primary outcome was safety of argatroban compared to UFH, assessed by time to first clinically relevant bleeding event or death during ECMO. Secondary outcomes included efficacy (time to thromboembolism) and feasibility (proportion of anticoagulation targets within range).
    RESULTS: From 2019 to 2021 57 patients were included in the study with 27 patients (47 %) receiving argatroban and 30 patients (53 %) receiving UFH. The time to the first clinically relevant bleeding or death during ECMO was similar between groups (HR (argatroban vs. UFH): 1.012, 95 % CI 0.44-2.35, p = 0.978). Argatroban was associated with a decreased risk for thromboembolism compared to UFH (HR 0.494 (95 % CI 0.26-0.95; p = 0.034)). The overall proportion of anticoagulation within target ranges was not different between groups (46 % (23-54 %) vs. 46 % (37 %-57 %), p = 0.45).
    CONCLUSIONS: Anticoagulation with argatroban according to hemoclot™ targets (0.4-0.6 μg/ml) compared to antiXa guided UFH (0.2-0.3 IU/ml) is safe and may prolong thromboembolism-free time in patients with severe ARDS requiring VV ECMO.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管肝素是目前在静脉动脉(VA)和静脉静脉(VV)体外膜氧合(ECMO)过程中的标准抗凝剂,因素包括肝素诱导的血小板减少症,肝素耐药性和药物短缺需要替代抗凝剂,如直接凝血酶抑制剂。目的是表征剂量,安全,ECMO支持期间比伐卢定的疗效。方法:这项回顾性单中心研究包括24名接受ECMO支持的成年人,他们接受了≥6小时的比伐卢定。主要终点为剂量至首次治疗活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)。次要终点包括评估ECMO模式之间的给药,出血和血栓事件的发生率,和治疗范围内的时间(TTR)。结果:首次治疗aPTT时的剂量为比伐卢定0.05[0.05-0.1]mg/kg/小时。与VV-ECMO患者相比,VAECMO患者的比伐卢定剂量要求较低,并且不受连续静脉静脉血液滤过的影响。VA-ECMO患者治疗aPTT的时间为5.5[2-13]小时,VV-ECMO患者为4.5[2-8.6]小时。在任何ECMO模式下,TTR为58.3%[39.6-73.1]。3例(13%)患者发生血栓事件,12例(50%)患者发生大出血。结论:我们的发现证明了基于ECMO模式的可变比伐卢定剂量要求,并且在CVVH期间可能不需要剂量修改。包括ECMO模式在内的因素,比伐卢定和联合抗血小板治疗的适应症可能会影响血液学事件.该数据的应用可以帮助开发比伐卢定ECMO方案,该方案在初始给药和TTR中提供较小的变异性。
    Objective: Although heparin is the current standard anticoagulant during venoarterial (VA) and venovenous (VV) extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO), factors including heparin-induced thrombocytopenia, heparin resistance and drug shortages necessitate alternative anticoagulants such as direct thrombin inhibitors. The aim was to characterize dosing, safety, and efficacy of bivalirudin during ECMO support. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 24 adults on ECMO support who received ≥6 hours of bivalirudin. The primary endpoint was dose to first therapeutic activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). Secondary endpoints included evaluating dosing between ECMO modes, incidence of bleeding and thrombotic events, and time in therapeutic range (TTR). Results: The dose at time of first therapeutic aPTT was bivalirudin 0.05 [0.05-0.1] mg/kg/hour. Bivalirudin dosing requirements were lower in VAECMO compared to VV-ECMO patients and were not impacted by continuous venovenous hemofiltration. Time to therapeutic aPTT was 5.5 [2-13] hours for VA-ECMO and 4.5 [2-8.6] hours for VV-ECMO patients. During any mode of ECMO TTR was 58.3% [39.6-73.1]. Thrombotic events occurred in 3 (13%) patients and major bleeding occurred in 12 (50%) patients. Conclusions: Our findings demonstrated variable bivalirudin dosing requirements based on mode of ECMO and dosing modifications may not be required during CVVH. Factors including mode of ECMO, indication for bivalirudin and concomitant antiplatelet therapy may impact hematologic events. Application of this data can assist with developing a bivalirudin ECMO protocol which provides less variability in initial dosing and TTR.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:本研究旨在调查幽门螺杆菌根除患者新开始接受华法林或直接口服抗凝剂(DOAC)治疗的上消化道出血(UGIB)住院风险。
    方法:我们从基于人群的电子医疗数据库中确定了所有以前接受过幽门螺杆菌根除治疗或在内窥镜检查中发现没有幽门螺杆菌的患者,然后新开始接受华法林或DOAC治疗。主要分析是幽门螺杆菌根除患者华法林和DOACs使用者之间的UGIB风险。次要分析包括根除幽门螺杆菌和新开始服用华法林或DOAC的幽门螺杆菌阴性患者之间的UGIB风险。UGIB的风险比(HR)通过合并具有时变协变量的治疗权重的逆倾向的组合逻辑回归模型来近似。
    结果:在根除幽门螺杆菌的患者中,与华法林相比,DOACs的UGIB风险明显降低(HR:0.26,95%CI0.09-0.71)。特别是,在老年(≥65岁)患者中观察到DOAC的UGIB风险较低,女性,那些没有UGIB或消化性溃疡病史的人,或者缺血性心脏病,和不使用酸抑制剂或阿司匹林。二次分析显示,根除幽门螺杆菌和新开始服用华法林(HR:0.63,95%CI0.33-1.19)或DOAC(HR:1.37,95%CI0.45-4.22)的幽门螺杆菌阴性患者之间的UGIB风险没有显着差异。
    结论:在根除幽门螺杆菌的患者中,DOACs新使用者的UGIB风险显著低于华法林新使用者.此外,在根除幽门螺杆菌和幽门螺杆菌阴性患者中,新使用华法林或DOACs患者的UGIB风险相当.
    BACKGROUND: To investigate risks of hospitalization for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in H. pylori-eradicated patients newly started on warfarin or direct oral anti-coagulants (DOACs).
    METHODS: We identified all patients who had previously received H. pylori eradication therapy or were found to have no H. pylori on endoscopy and were then newly started on warfarin or DOACs from a population-based electronic healthcare database. Primary analysis was the risk of UGIB between warfarin and DOACs users in H. pylori-eradicated patients. Secondary analysis included the UGIB risk between H. pylori-eradicated and H. pylori-negative patients who were newly started on warfarin or DOACs. The hazard ratio (HR) of UGIB was approximated by pooled logistic regression model incorporating the inverse propensity of treatment weightings with time-varying covariables.
    RESULTS: Among H. pylori-eradicated patients, DOACs had a significantly lower risk of UGIB (HR: 0.26, 95% CI 0.09-0.71) compared with warfarin. In particular, lower UGIB risks with DOACs were observed among older (≥65 years) patients, female, those without a history of UGIB or peptic ulcer, or ischemic heart disease, and non-users of acid-suppressive agents or aspirin. Secondary analysis showed no significant difference in UGIB risk between H. pylori-eradicated and H. pylori-negative patients newly started on warfarin (HR: 0.63,95% CI 0.33-1.19) or DOACs (HR: 1.37, 95% CI 0.45-4.22).
    CONCLUSIONS: In H. pylori-eradicated patients, new users of DOACs had a significantly lower risk of UGIB than new warfarin users. Furthermore, the risk of UGIB in new warfarin or DOACs users was comparable between H. pylori-eradicated and H. pylori-negative patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    核酸纳米技术提供了创造前所未有的纳米结构的能力,具有不同的架构和功能,可用于无数领域。一套自折叠,携带凝血酶RNA适体的单链RNA折纸结构已被证明可作为抗凝剂。这里,我们描述了生产和测试这种RNA折纸抗凝剂的详细方法。这种方法突出了RNA折纸在生物医学应用中的潜力。
    Nucleic acid nanotechnology provides the ability to create unprecedented nanostructures with diverse architectures and functions that can be utilized in myriad fields. A set of self-folding, single-stranded RNA origami structures bearing thrombin RNA aptamers have been demonstrated to act as anticoagulants. Here, we describe the detailed methods of producing and testing of such RNA origami anticoagulants. This method highlights the potential of RNA origami for biomedical applications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    肝素诱导的血小板减少症(HIT)是需要体外循环(CPB)的心脏手术中的主要问题。HIT代表肝素给药后的严重药物不良反应。它由免疫介导的血小板减少症矛盾地导致血栓事件组成。在功能性体外测试中,在肝素存在下检测抗血小板因子4/肝素(抗-PF4/H)的抗体和血小板聚集证实了诊断。患有HIT并需要心脏手术的患者面临致命并发症的高风险,并面临特殊挑战。在通常的HIT时间表中描述了四个不同的阶段,为CPB选择的抗凝策略取决于患者的分类阶段。在这个意义上,我们制定了涵盖每个阶段的机构协议。它包括使用非肝素抗凝剂,如比伐卢定,或普通肝素(UFH)与强效抗血小板药物如替罗非班或坎格雷洛的联合。用静脉内免疫球蛋白(IvIg)暂时减少抗PF4最近被描述为一种补充策略。在这篇文章中,我们简要描述了HIT的病理生理学,并重点介绍了可用于安全管理这些患者CPB的各种策略.
    Heparin-induced thrombocytopenia (HIT) is a major issue in cardiac surgery requiring cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB). HIT represents a severe adverse drug reaction after heparin administration. It consists of immune-mediated thrombocytopenia paradoxically leading to thrombotic events. Detection of antibodies against platelets factor 4/heparin (anti-PF4/H) and aggregation of platelets in the presence of heparin in functional in vitro tests confirm the diagnosis. Patients suffering from HIT and requiring cardiac surgery are at high risk of lethal complications and present specific challenges. Four distinct phases are described in the usual HIT timeline, and the anticoagulation strategy chosen for CPB depends on the phase in which the patient is categorized. In this sense, we developed an institutional protocol covering each phase. It consisted of the use of a non-heparin anticoagulant such as bivalirudin, or the association of unfractionated heparin (UFH) with a potent antiplatelet drug such as tirofiban or cangrelor. Temporary reduction of anti-PF4 with intravenous immunoglobulins (IvIg) has recently been described as a complementary strategy. In this article, we briefly described the pathophysiology of HIT and focused on the various strategies that can be applied to safely manage CPB in these patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Multicenter Study
    背景:与活化部分凝血活酶时间(aPTT)相比,血栓弹力图(TEG)提供了更动态的止血评估。然而,TEG在体外膜氧合(ECMO)期间监测比伐卢定的临床应用尚不清楚.本研究的目的是评估比伐卢定抗凝的成年ECMO患者中aPTT和TEG之间的相关性。
    方法:这是一个多中心,回顾性,进行了为期2年的队列研究。包括需要ECMO和比伐卢定治疗的成人患者,其中≥1个相应的标准TEG和aPTT血浆样本彼此抽取≤4小时。主要终点是确定标准TEG反应(R)时间与比伐卢定aPTT血清浓度之间的相关系数。
    结果:共纳入104例患者,包括848例同时进行的TEGR时间和aPTT实验室评估。在研究人群中证明了TEG-R时间和aPTT之间的中度相关性(r=0.41;p<0.001)。总的来说,502(59.2%)对TEGR时间和aPTT值的并发评估显示它们是否属于次级,supra-,或根据机构对比伐卢定的分类进行治疗。“治疗性”aPTT中的42.2%(n=271/642)不一致的TEGR时间在亚治疗和超治疗类别之间几乎相等。
    结论:在危重患者ECMO过程中,TEGR时间与aPTT与比伐卢定之间存在中度相关性。需要进一步的研究来解决最佳测试,以指导ECMO患者抗凝剂量的临床决策。
    Thromboelastography (TEG) offers a more dynamic assessment of hemostasis over activated partial thromboplastin time (aPTT). However, the clinical utility of TEG in monitoring bivalirudin during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) remains unknown. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the correlation between aPTT and TEG in adult ECMO patients anticoagulated with bivalirudin.
    Multicenter, retrospective, cohort study conducted over a 2-year period.
    Two academic university medical centers (Banner University Medical Center) in Phoenix and Tucson, AZ.
    Adult patients requiring ECMO and bivalirudin therapy with ≥1 corresponding standard TEG and aPTT plasma samples drawn ≤4 h of each other were included. The primary endpoint was to determine the correlation coefficient between the standard TEG reaction (R) time and bivalirudin aPTT serum concentrations.
    A total of 104 patients consisting of 848 concurrent laboratory assessments of R time and aPTT were included. A moderate correlation between TEG R time and aPTT was demonstrated in the study population (r = 0.41; p < 0.001). Overall, 502 (59.2%) concurrent assessments of TEG R time and aPTT values showed agreement on whether they were sub-, supra-, or therapeutic according to the institution\'s classification for bivalirudin. The 42.2% (n = 271/642) discordant TEG R times among \"therapeutic\" aPTT were almost equally distributed between subtherapeutic and supratherapeutic categories.
    Moderate correlation was found between TEG R time and aPTT associated with bivalirudin during ECMO in critically ill adults. Further research is warranted to address the optimal test to guide clinical decision-making for anticoagulation dosing in ECMO patients.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号