dermatologist

皮肤科医生
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:性传播感染(STIs)和生殖道感染(RTIs)在全球范围内构成了重大的公共卫生挑战。特别是在资源有限的环境中。这项研究旨在调查医疗保健提供者在管理和预防印度性传播感染/RTI方面面临的挑战。材料和方法对8家医疗保健提供者进行了深入访谈,包括辅导员,妇科医生,和皮肤科医生,在政府环境中工作。半结构化访谈指南用于探索与患者护理和医疗保健系统资源相关的挑战。结果研究显示,患者对性传播感染/RTI的知识和意识存在显著差距,误解会影响寻求治疗的行为。社会耻辱和文化障碍被认为是开放沟通和及时护理的主要障碍。注意到在寻求医疗保健行为和伴侣通知方面存在针对性别的挑战。医疗保健提供者报告说,治疗试剂盒和药物的可用性不一致,以及在确保患者依从性方面的挑战。需要改善医疗基础设施,包括专门诊所和更好的部门间协调,被突出显示。结论应对STI/RTI管理挑战需要多方面的方法,包括提高公众意识,确保一致的药物供应,建立专门诊所,加强部门间的协调。这些发现为在资源有限的环境中开发有针对性的干预措施以改善STI/RTI管理和预防提供了宝贵的见解。
    Background Sexually transmitted infections (STIs) and reproductive tract infections (RTIs) pose significant public health challenges globally, particularly in resource-limited settings. This study aimed to investigate the challenges faced by healthcare providers in managing and preventing STIs/RTIs in India. Materials and methods In-depth interviews were conducted with eight healthcare providers, including counselors, gynecologists, and dermatologists, working in government settings. A semi-structured interview guide was used to explore challenges related to patient care and healthcare system resources. Results The study revealed significant gaps in patient knowledge and awareness about STIs/RTIs, with misconceptions affecting treatment-seeking behavior. Social stigma and cultural barriers were identified as major obstacles to open communication and timely care. Gender-specific challenges in healthcare-seeking behavior and partner notification were noted. Healthcare providers reported inconsistent availability of treatment kits and medications, as well as challenges in ensuring patient compliance. The need for improved healthcare infrastructure, including specialized clinics and better interdepartmental coordination, was highlighted. Conclusion Addressing STI/RTI management challenges requires a multifaceted approach, including enhancing public awareness, ensuring consistent medication supply, establishing specialized clinics, and improving interdepartmental coordination. These findings provide valuable insights for developing targeted interventions to improve STI/RTI management and prevention in resource-limited settings.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:患者报告的结果与临床实践相关,显示患者的益处,支持临床医生的决策,并有助于提供高标准的护理。对患者报告的结果进行数字监测仍然很少见。患者获益指数(PBI)衡量患者观点的获益和目标,可能与定期记录和共同决策相关。
    目的:本研究旨在开发PBI的电子版,以检查其在银屑病患者临床实践中的可行性和可接受性。
    方法:我们开发了一个应用程序,在对其可行性和可接受性进行定量调查之前,使用焦点小组和对患者的认知汇报进行有效的PBI。Conduction参加了德国的门诊皮肤科护理室。进行描述性和亚组分析。
    结果:共有139名患者完成了电子PBIs(ePBIs)并参与了调查。ePBI是可以理解的(n=129-137,92.8%-98.6%)和可行的,例如,易于阅读(n=135,97.1%)和简单处理(n=137,98.5%)。可接受性也很高,例如,患者可以想象在实践中使用和讨论ePBI数据(n=91,65.5%)并定期记录(n=88,63.3%).他们认为它可以支持治疗决策(n=118,84.9%)并改善与医生的沟通(n=112,81.3%)。他们可以想象定期填写电子问卷(n=118,84.9%),甚至更喜欢电子版本而不是纸质版本(n=113,81.2%)。年龄较大和受教育程度较低的人表现出更小的可行性,但是后者希望与医生的关系得到改善,并且更愿意投入时间或精力。
    结论:PBI的应用程序和网络版本对于提供全面文档和患者参与实践的患者是可用和可接受的。实施策略应考虑患者的需求,障碍,和促进者,还有医生的态度和医疗保健系统的要求。
    BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes are relevant in clinical practice showing patient benefits, supporting clinicians\' decision-making, and contributing to the delivery of high standards of care. Digital monitoring of patient-reported outcomes is still rare. The Patient Benefit Index (PBI) measures benefits and goals from patients\' views and may be relevant for regular documentation and shared decision-making.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to develop electronic versions of the PBI to examine their feasibility and acceptability in clinical practice for patients with psoriasis.
    METHODS: We developed an app and a web version of the existing, valid PBI using focus groups and cognitive debriefings with patients before conducting a quantitative survey on its feasibility and acceptability. Conduction took part in an outpatient dermatology care unit in Germany. Descriptive and subgroup analyses were conducted.
    RESULTS: A total of 139 patients completed the electronic PBIs (ePBIs) and took part in the survey. The ePBI was understandable (n=129-137, 92.8%-98.6%) and feasible, for example, easy to read (n=135, 97.1%) and simple to handle (n=137, 98.5%). Acceptability was also high, for example, patients can imagine using and discussing the ePBI data in practice (n=91, 65.5%) and documenting it regularly (n=88, 63.3%). They believe it could support treatment decisions (n=118, 84.9%) and improve communication with their physician (n=112, 81.3%). They can imagine filling in electronic questionnaires regularly (n=118, 84.9%), even preferring electronic over paper versions (n=113, 81.2%). Older and less educated people show less feasibility, but the latter expected the relationship with their physician to improve and would be more willing to invest time or effort.
    CONCLUSIONS: The app and web version of the PBI are usable and acceptable for patients offering comprehensive documentation and patient participation in practice. An implementation strategy should consider patients\' needs, barriers, and facilitators but also physicians\' attitudes and requirements from the health care system.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    共享决策(SDM)是一个协作过程,涉及医疗保健提供者和患者进行医疗决策。这在医疗保健实践中越来越突出。但是,在中国,关于医疗实践中的SDM水平以及美容皮肤科医生实施SDM过程中的障碍和刺激因素的证据有限。
    从2023年7月到8月,在中国在线招募了1938名皮肤科医生。通过电子问卷收集数据,涵盖:(1)人口统计学特征;(2)SDM问卷医生版本(SDM-Q-Doc);(3)SDM实施中的刺激和障碍。Logistic回归用于探索与SDM实践相关的因素,障碍,和SDM实施的刺激,分别。
    1938名皮肤科医生包括1329名女性(68.6%),平均年龄35岁。SDM总分范围从0到45,中位数为40(IQR:35-44),中位数刺激得分和障碍得分分别为28(IQR:24-32)和19(IQR:13-26),分别。良好SDM的患病率为27.2%,逻辑回归表明,女性皮肤科医生(比值比,OR=1.21,95%置信区间,CI:0.96-1.51),和皮肤科医生与更多年的美学实践有较高的比例良好的SDM实践(OR为1.445-9年,10-15年为1.58,15年以上为1.77)。此外,受教育程度较高并在私人环境中服务的女性皮肤科医生和皮肤科医生的障碍评分较低;从事美学实践多年的女性皮肤科医生和皮肤科医生的刺激评分较高.
    中国美容皮肤科医生似乎在积极水平上实施SDM,在SDM实施中具有更多的刺激和更少的障碍。将SDM整合到皮肤科医生的临床实践中对于患者和皮肤科医生都是有益的。此外,在医学美学期间,应大力推广和加强SDM实践,尤其是男性皮肤科医生,工作经验较少的皮肤科医生,以及在公共机构工作的人。
    UNASSIGNED: Shared decision making (SDM) is a collaborative process involving both healthcare providers and patients in making medical decisions, which gains increasing prominence in healthcare practice. But evidence on the level of SDM in medical practice and barriers as well as stimulus during the SDM implementation among aesthetic dermatologists is limited in China.
    UNASSIGNED: From July to August 2023, 1938 dermatologists were recruited online in China. Data were collected through an electronic questionnaire covering: (1) demographic features; (2) SDM questionnaire physician version (SDM-Q-Doc); and (3) stimulus and barriers in SDM implementation. Logistic regression was applied to explore factors associated with SDM practice, barriers, and stimulus of SDM implementation, respectively.
    UNASSIGNED: The 1938 dermatologists included 1329 females (68.6%), with an average age of 35 years. The total SDM score ranged from 0 to 45, with a median value of 40 (IQR: 35-44), and the median stimulus score and barriers scores were 28 (IQR: 24-32) and 19 (IQR: 13-26), respectively. The prevalence of good SDM was 27.2%, logistic regression indicated that female dermatologists (odds ratio, OR=1.21, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.96-1.51), and dermatologists with more years of aesthetic practice had a higher proportion of good SDM practice (OR was 1.44 for 5-9 years, 1.58 for 10-15 years and 1.77 for over 15 years). Moreover, female dermatologists and dermatologists with higher education level and serviced in private settings had lower barrier scores; female dermatologists and dermatologists with more years of aesthetic practice had higher stimulus scores.
    UNASSIGNED: Chinese aesthetic dermatologists appear to implement SDM at an active level, with more stimulus and less barriers in SDM implementation. The integration of SDM into clinical practice among dermatologists is beneficial both for patients and dermatologists. Moreover, SDM practice should be strongly promoted and enhanced during medical aesthetics, especially among male dermatologists, dermatologists with less working experience, and those who work at public institutions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:皮肤科患者教育材料(PEM)的书写水平通常高于全国平均水平的七至八年级阅读水平。ChatGPT-3.5,GPT-4,DermGPT,和DocsGPT是响应用户提示的大型语言模型(LLM)。我们的项目评估了它们在指定阅读水平下生成皮肤病学PEM的用途。
    目的:本研究旨在评估在未指定和指定的阅读水平下,选择LLM在常见和罕见皮肤病学中产生PEM的能力。Further,该研究旨在评估这些LLM生成的PEM的意义保存情况,由皮肤科住院医师评估。
    方法:当前美国皮肤病学会PEMs的Flesch-Kincaid阅读水平(FKRL)评估了4种常见(特应性皮炎,寻常痤疮,牛皮癣,和带状疱疹)和4例罕见(大疱性表皮松解症,大疱性类天疱疮,层状鱼鳞病,和扁平苔藓)皮肤病。我们提示ChatGPT-3.5,GPT-4,DermGPT,和DocsGPT以“在[FKRL]中创建关于[条件]的患者教育讲义”,以在未指定的五年级和七年级FKRL中每个条件迭代生成10个PEM,使用MicrosoftWord可读性统计进行评估。由2名皮肤科住院医师评估了LLM中意义的保留。
    结果:当前的美国皮肤病学会PEMs对常见和罕见疾病的平均(SD)FKRL为9.35(1.26)和9.50(2.3),分别。对于常见疾病,LLM生产的PEM的FKRL介于9.8和11.21之间(未指定提示),在4.22和7.43之间(五年级提示),在5.98和7.28之间(七年级提示)。对于罕见疾病,LLM生产的PEM的FKRL范围在9.85和11.45之间(未指定提示),在4.22和7.43之间(五年级提示),在5.98和7.28之间(七年级提示)。在五年级阅读水平,与ChatGPT-3.5相比,GPT-4在常见和罕见条件下都能更好地生产PEM(分别为P=.001和P=.01),DermGPT(分别为P<.001和P=.03),和DocsGPT(分别为P<.001和P=.02)。在七年级的阅读水平,ChatGPT-3.5、GPT-4、DocsGPT、或DermGPT在生产常见条件下的PEM(所有P>.05);然而,对于罕见的情况,ChatGPT-3.5和DocsGPT的表现优于GPT-4(分别为P=.003和P<.001)。意义分析的保留表明,对于共同条件,DermGPT在整体阅读便利性方面排名最高,患者的可理解性,和准确性(14.75/15,98%);对于罕见的情况,GPT-4产生的施舍排名最高(14.5/15,97%)。
    结论:GPT-4的表现似乎优于ChatGPT-3.5,DocsGPT,和DermGPT在五年级FKRL的常见和罕见的情况下,尽管ChatGPT-3.5和DocsGPT在7级FKRL中在罕见情况下的表现均优于GPT-4。LLM生产的PEM可以可靠地满足七级FKRL的选择常见和罕见的皮肤病,并且易于阅读,患者可以理解,而且大多是准确的。LLM可能在提高健康素养和传播无障碍方面发挥作用,在皮肤病学中可以理解的PEM。
    BACKGROUND: Dermatologic patient education materials (PEMs) are often written above the national average seventh- to eighth-grade reading level. ChatGPT-3.5, GPT-4, DermGPT, and DocsGPT are large language models (LLMs) that are responsive to user prompts. Our project assesses their use in generating dermatologic PEMs at specified reading levels.
    OBJECTIVE: This study aims to assess the ability of select LLMs to generate PEMs for common and rare dermatologic conditions at unspecified and specified reading levels. Further, the study aims to assess the preservation of meaning across such LLM-generated PEMs, as assessed by dermatology resident trainees.
    METHODS: The Flesch-Kincaid reading level (FKRL) of current American Academy of Dermatology PEMs was evaluated for 4 common (atopic dermatitis, acne vulgaris, psoriasis, and herpes zoster) and 4 rare (epidermolysis bullosa, bullous pemphigoid, lamellar ichthyosis, and lichen planus) dermatologic conditions. We prompted ChatGPT-3.5, GPT-4, DermGPT, and DocsGPT to \"Create a patient education handout about [condition] at a [FKRL]\" to iteratively generate 10 PEMs per condition at unspecified fifth- and seventh-grade FKRLs, evaluated with Microsoft Word readability statistics. The preservation of meaning across LLMs was assessed by 2 dermatology resident trainees.
    RESULTS: The current American Academy of Dermatology PEMs had an average (SD) FKRL of 9.35 (1.26) and 9.50 (2.3) for common and rare diseases, respectively. For common diseases, the FKRLs of LLM-produced PEMs ranged between 9.8 and 11.21 (unspecified prompt), between 4.22 and 7.43 (fifth-grade prompt), and between 5.98 and 7.28 (seventh-grade prompt). For rare diseases, the FKRLs of LLM-produced PEMs ranged between 9.85 and 11.45 (unspecified prompt), between 4.22 and 7.43 (fifth-grade prompt), and between 5.98 and 7.28 (seventh-grade prompt). At the fifth-grade reading level, GPT-4 was better at producing PEMs for both common and rare conditions than ChatGPT-3.5 (P=.001 and P=.01, respectively), DermGPT (P<.001 and P=.03, respectively), and DocsGPT (P<.001 and P=.02, respectively). At the seventh-grade reading level, no significant difference was found between ChatGPT-3.5, GPT-4, DocsGPT, or DermGPT in producing PEMs for common conditions (all P>.05); however, for rare conditions, ChatGPT-3.5 and DocsGPT outperformed GPT-4 (P=.003 and P<.001, respectively). The preservation of meaning analysis revealed that for common conditions, DermGPT ranked the highest for overall ease of reading, patient understandability, and accuracy (14.75/15, 98%); for rare conditions, handouts generated by GPT-4 ranked the highest (14.5/15, 97%).
    CONCLUSIONS: GPT-4 appeared to outperform ChatGPT-3.5, DocsGPT, and DermGPT at the fifth-grade FKRL for both common and rare conditions, although both ChatGPT-3.5 and DocsGPT performed better than GPT-4 at the seventh-grade FKRL for rare conditions. LLM-produced PEMs may reliably meet seventh-grade FKRLs for select common and rare dermatologic conditions and are easy to read, understandable for patients, and mostly accurate. LLMs may play a role in enhancing health literacy and disseminating accessible, understandable PEMs in dermatology.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:皮肤镜检查已被确立为广泛的皮肤病的重要诊断工具。这项研究旨在评估希腊皮肤科医生在临床实践中使用皮肤镜检查。方法:在全国范围内进行问卷调查,收集皮肤镜检查频率的资料,检查的病变类型,培训和教育资源,以及影响将皮肤镜检查纳入日常临床常规的选择的因素。结果:共有366名希腊皮肤科医生参与了调查。大多数受访者报告说,他们在实践中每天都会使用皮肤镜检查。色素性和非色素性病变,炎症性疾病,皮肤感染,头发紊乱,和指甲病变是皮肤镜检查最常见的适应症。影响皮肤镜检查使用的因素包括诊断准确性提高,加强病人护理,更好的患者沟通和一般依从性,提高了皮肤科医生的满意度。结论:这项基于国家问卷调查的研究表明,皮肤镜检查已成为希腊日常皮肤病学实践不可或缺的一部分。研究结果强调了结构化培训和教育对促进皮肤镜检查的有效和常规使用的重要性。将皮肤镜检查纳入临床实践不仅提高了诊断精度,而且增强了患者护理。为希腊皮肤科服务的整体质量做出贡献。
    Background: Dermatoscopy has been established as an important diagnostic tool for a wide range of skin diseases. This study aims to evaluate the use of dermatoscopy in clinical practice among Greek dermatologists. Methods: A nationwide questionnaire-based survey was conducted collecting data on the frequency of dermatoscopic examinations, the types of lesions examined, training and educational resources, as well as factors influencing the choice to incorporate dermatoscopy into daily clinical routines. Results: A total of 366 Greek dermatologists participated in the survey. Most of the respondents reported the daily use of dermatoscopy in their practice. Pigmented and non-pigmented lesions, inflammatory diseases, cutaneous infectious, hair disorders, and nail lesions were the most common indications for dermatoscopy. Factors influencing the utilization of dermatoscopy included increased diagnostic accuracy, enhanced patient care, better patient communication and general compliance, and improved satisfaction among dermatologists. Conclusions: This national questionnaire-based study demonstrates that dermatoscopy has become an integral part of daily dermatological practice in Greece. The findings highlight the significance of structured training and education to promote dermoscopy\'s effective and routine use. Incorporating dermatoscopy into clinical practice not only improves diagnostic precision but also enhances patient care, contributing to the overall quality of dermatological services in Greece.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:鉴于国家卫生服务部门远程数字皮肤病服务的扩展,特别是在COVID-19大流行期间,需要一种方法来识别有数字排斥风险的患者,以指导服务共同设计过程中的公平代表性,并根据患者群体的需求定制远程服务。
    目的:此质量改进项目旨在为远程服务的重新设计提供信息,以最佳地支持慢性皮肤病患者的持续需求,确保服务符合患者的数字健康素养要求。
    方法:我们分析了123名需要在2家专科诊所进行长期监测的慢性皮肤病患者的数字健康素养(伦敦,联合王国)使用多维健康技术准备和能力指数(READHY)问卷以及优化健康素养和获取(Ophelia)过程进行层次聚类分析。
    结果:对回应参与者(n=116)的READHY维度的聚类分析显示了7组具有明显的数字和健康素养特征。第1组(n=22,19%)和第2组(n=20,17.2%)的高READHY得分代表那些对管理健康和使用技术充满信心的人。而得分较低的组,6(n=4,3.4%)和7(n=12,10.3%),依靠传统服务。第3组(n=27,23.3%),4(n=23,19.8%),5人(n=8,6.9%)有不同的数字技能,access,和参与,突出可能受益于共同设计的皮肤病学服务的人群。
    结论:通过识别具有可区分的数字访问模式和健康素养的患者群体,我们的方法表明,63.8%(n=74)在我们中心的专科诊所就诊的患者需要支持,以优化远程随访或需要其他方法.未来的努力应该简化READHY问题简介,以提高其实用性,并利用焦点小组来引出让患者参与数字服务的策略。
    BACKGROUND: Given the expansion of remote digital dermatology services from the National Health Service, particularly during the COVID-19 pandemic, there is a need for methods that identify patients at risk of digital exclusion to guide equitable representation in service co-design processes and tailor remote services to the needs of their patient population.
    OBJECTIVE: This quality improvement project aims to inform the redesign of remote services to optimally support the ongoing needs of patients with chronic skin diseases, ensuring that the services are tailored to patients\' digital health literacy requirements.
    METHODS: We profiled the digital health literacy of 123 people with chronic skin conditions who require long-term surveillance in 2 specialist clinics (London, United Kingdom) using the Multidimensional Readiness and Enablement Index for Health Technology (READHY) questionnaire alongside the Optimizing Health Literacy and Access (Ophelia) process for hierarchical cluster analysis.
    RESULTS: The cluster analysis of READHY dimensions in responding participants (n=116) revealed 7 groups with distinct digital and health literacy characteristics. High READHY scores in groups 1 (n=22, 19%) and 2 (n=20, 17.2%) represent those who are confident with managing their health and using technology, whereas the lower-scoring groups, 6 (n=4, 3.4%) and 7 (n=12, 10.3%), depended on traditional services. Groups 3 (n=27, 23.3%), 4 (n=23, 19.8%), and 5 (n=8, 6.9%) had varying digital skills, access, and engagement, highlighting a population that may benefit from a co-designed dermatology service.
    CONCLUSIONS: By identifying patient groups with distinguishable patterns of digital access and health literacy, our method demonstrates that 63.8% (n=74) of people attending specialist clinics in our center require support in order to optimize remote follow-up or need an alternative approach. Future efforts should streamline the READHY question profile to improve its practicality and use focus groups to elicit strategies for engaging patients with digital services.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:胎盘提取物主要用于皮肤护理以达到美容目的。然而,由于缺乏有效的应用方法,各种胎盘提取物的使用受到限制。
    目的:在本研究中,我们研究了含有马胎盘提取物作为主要成分的乳膏配方-LNC皱纹眼霜(LNC-EC)的抗皱作用。
    方法:共有24名健康女性,37-54岁,1-3级皱纹,用LNC-EC治疗2周。面霜涂在一半的参与者脸上,并将结果与未处理的一半面部进行比较。
    结果:目视检查,使用皱纹等级标准,结果表明,在施用LNC-EC前后进行比较时,用LNC-EC处理的区域的皱纹等级明显低于未处理的区域。此外,复制品分析显示,与施用之前和之后的未处理区域相比,LNC-EC处理区域的最大皱纹宽度和皱纹数量均显著减少。这些结果表明,LNC-EC根据最大皱纹宽度和皱纹数量等参数对眼角具有抗皱作用。
    结论:LNC-EC,以马胎盘提取物为主要成分,被证明可以有效改善眼角的皱纹,可能是由于最大皱纹宽度和皱纹数量的减少。对结果的解释是有限的,因为这项研究仅在干预组中进行。必须进行安慰剂对照组的随机对照试验,以验证马胎盘提取物的抗皱作用。
    BACKGROUND: Placental extract has been mostly used in skin care for cosmetic purposes. However, the use of various placental extracts has been limited due to the lack of established and effective application methods.
    OBJECTIVE: In this study, we investigated the antiwrinkle effect of a cream formulation-LNC wrinkle eye cream (LNC-EC)-containing horse placental extract as the main ingredient.
    METHODS: A total of 24 healthy women, aged 37-54 years, with wrinkle grades 1-3, were treated with LNC-EC for 2 weeks. The cream was applied on one-half of the participants\' faces, and the results were compared with the untreated half of the face.
    RESULTS: Visual inspection, using the wrinkle grade standard, showed that the area treated with LNC-EC had a significantly lower wrinkle grade than the untreated area when comparing before and after the application of LNC-EC. In addition, replica analysis showed a significant reduction in both the maximum wrinkle width and the number of wrinkles in the LNC-EC-treated area in comparison to the untreated area before and after the application. These results suggest that LNC-EC has an antiwrinkle effect on the corners of the eyes based on parameters like the maximum wrinkle width and the number of wrinkles.
    CONCLUSIONS: LNC-EC, with horse placental extract as its main ingredient, was shown to be effective in improving wrinkles at the eye corners, presumably due to a reduction in the maximum wrinkle width and the number of wrinkles. Interpretation of the results is limited because this study was conducted only in the intervention group. A randomized controlled trial with a placebo control group is necessary to verify the antiwrinkle effects of horse placental extract.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号