BACKGROUND: Limited evidence is available on real-world management of atopic dermatitis (AD) among Asian adults. This cross-sectional study aimed to assess current approaches in AD diagnosis and management in Asia.
METHODS: Practising dermatologists regularly treating patients with moderate-to-severe AD were recruited from eight Asia-Pacific territories, namely Mainland China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand. A survey was administered to eligible dermatologists after screening and taking informed consent. Data from fully completed submissions were analysed using descriptive statistics. The study was reviewed by the institutional review board in each territory.
RESULTS: Data from 271 dermatologists were included for analysis. About one-third (31.7%) reported that they referred to the Hanifin and Rajka criteria during diagnosis. The majority of dermatologists used clinical impression when assessing AD severity and treatment response. Reduction of eczema and pruritus was the primary treatment objective when managing both acute (98.1%) and chronic (69.1%) AD. More than half of dermatologists preferred adding systemic anti-inflammatory medication for patients who did not respond to maximized topical treatment, while 43.6% would switch to another systemic medication for those failing to respond to maximized systemic treatment. Topical corticosteroids were frequently selected by dermatologists. For systemic therapies, oral corticosteroids were most frequently used, followed by cyclosporin and dupilumab. Narrow-band ultraviolet B was the most common phototherapy reported (84.9%). There was considerable variation in estimated average and maximum durations of therapies used to treat AD.
CONCLUSIONS: This study has provided insights on the real-world management of moderate-to-severe AD in the Asia-Pacific region. The diverse approaches in diagnosis and treatment highlight the multifactorial nature of AD, reliance on clinical judgement, and importance of personalized care. To improve outcomes in patients with AD, it will be crucial to develop biomarkers for diagnosis, reduce subjectivity in assessment, as well as promote access to newer and effective therapies.

BACKGROUND: Recent advancements in artificial intelligence (AI) and large language models (LLMs) have shown potential in medical fields, including dermatology. With the introduction of image analysis capabilities in LLMs, their application in dermatological diagnostics has garnered significant interest. These capabilities are enabled by the integration of computer vision techniques into the underlying architecture of LLMs.
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to compare the diagnostic performance of Claude 3 Opus and ChatGPT with GPT-4 in analyzing dermoscopic images for melanoma detection, providing insights into their strengths and limitations.
METHODS: We randomly selected 100 histopathology-confirmed dermoscopic images (50 malignant, 50 benign) from the International Skin Imaging Collaboration (ISIC) archive using a computer-generated randomization process. The ISIC archive was chosen due to its comprehensive and well-annotated collection of dermoscopic images, ensuring a diverse and representative sample. Images were included if they were dermoscopic images of melanocytic lesions with histopathologically confirmed diagnoses. Each model was given the same prompt, instructing it to provide the top 3 differential diagnoses for each image, ranked by likelihood. Primary diagnosis accuracy, accuracy of the top 3 differential diagnoses, and malignancy discrimination ability were assessed. The McNemar test was chosen to compare the diagnostic performance of the 2 models, as it is suitable for analyzing paired nominal data.
RESULTS: In the primary diagnosis, Claude 3 Opus achieved 54.9% sensitivity (95% CI 44.08%-65.37%), 57.14% specificity (95% CI 46.31%-67.46%), and 56% accuracy (95% CI 46.22%-65.42%), while ChatGPT demonstrated 56.86% sensitivity (95% CI 45.99%-67.21%), 38.78% specificity (95% CI 28.77%-49.59%), and 48% accuracy (95% CI 38.37%-57.75%). The McNemar test showed no significant difference between the 2 models (P=.17). For the top 3 differential diagnoses, Claude 3 Opus and ChatGPT included the correct diagnosis in 76% (95% CI 66.33%-83.77%) and 78% (95% CI 68.46%-85.45%) of cases, respectively. The McNemar test showed no significant difference (P=.56). In malignancy discrimination, Claude 3 Opus outperformed ChatGPT with 47.06% sensitivity, 81.63% specificity, and 64% accuracy, compared to 45.1%, 42.86%, and 44%, respectively. The McNemar test showed a significant difference (P<.001). Claude 3 Opus had an odds ratio of 3.951 (95% CI 1.685-9.263) in discriminating malignancy, while ChatGPT-4 had an odds ratio of 0.616 (95% CI 0.297-1.278).
CONCLUSIONS: Our study highlights the potential of LLMs in assisting dermatologists but also reveals their limitations. Both models made errors in diagnosing melanoma and benign lesions. These findings underscore the need for developing robust, transparent, and clinically validated AI models through collaborative efforts between AI researchers, dermatologists, and other health care professionals. While AI can provide valuable insights, it cannot yet replace the expertise of trained clinicians.

BACKGROUND: It remains unclear how patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) and clinicians perceive the level of patient-clinician communication and if there could be potential lapses. This cross-sectional study aims to compare perspectives between patients with AD and dermatologists regarding communication and treatment expectations in Asia.
METHODS: Moderate-to-severe patients with AD and practicing dermatologists were recruited from eight Asia-Pacific territories, including Mainland China, Hong Kong, India, Japan, Singapore, South Korea, Taiwan, and Thailand. Patients and dermatologists completed separate surveys designed to elicit their expectations regarding AD management, and their perceived level of patient-clinician communication. Patients were also asked about their treatment satisfaction and whether they prefer additional treatment beyond what was prescribed. Demographic information and responses were analyzed using descriptive statistics. The study was reviewed by the institutional review board in each territory, and all participants provided informed consent.
RESULTS: A total of 1103 patients and 271 dermatologists completed the surveys. Both patients and dermatologists were largely aligned in their top treatment goals in AD management. However, greater proportions of patients prioritized the prevention of exacerbation (78.0% versus 47.2%), minimization of treatment adverse effects (46.4% versus 9.1%), and improvement in mental health (16.0% versus 4.9%), compared with dermatologists. Although patient-clinician communication was observed to be generally good, 10.9% of patients reported dissatisfaction with communication in AD management. The majority of patients were either \"very satisfied\" or \"satisfied\" with their latest acute AD treatment, but 65.5% of patients still desired additional treatment.
CONCLUSIONS: This multinational study has provided insights on the perspectives of Asian patients and dermatologists in treatment goals, AD management, and communication. In general, both patients and dermatologists were aligned in treatment goals and there was satisfactory patient-clinician communication in most aspects. However, potential areas of improvement have been identified to further enhance patient-centered care.

UNASSIGNED: Shared decision making (SDM) is a collaborative process involving both healthcare providers and patients in making medical decisions, which gains increasing prominence in healthcare practice. But evidence on the level of SDM in medical practice and barriers as well as stimulus during the SDM implementation among aesthetic dermatologists is limited in China.
UNASSIGNED: From July to August 2023, 1938 dermatologists were recruited online in China. Data were collected through an electronic questionnaire covering: (1) demographic features; (2) SDM questionnaire physician version (SDM-Q-Doc); and (3) stimulus and barriers in SDM implementation. Logistic regression was applied to explore factors associated with SDM practice, barriers, and stimulus of SDM implementation, respectively.
UNASSIGNED: The 1938 dermatologists included 1329 females (68.6%), with an average age of 35 years. The total SDM score ranged from 0 to 45, with a median value of 40 (IQR: 35-44), and the median stimulus score and barriers scores were 28 (IQR: 24-32) and 19 (IQR: 13-26), respectively. The prevalence of good SDM was 27.2%, logistic regression indicated that female dermatologists (odds ratio, OR=1.21, 95% confidence interval, CI: 0.96-1.51), and dermatologists with more years of aesthetic practice had a higher proportion of good SDM practice (OR was 1.44 for 5-9 years, 1.58 for 10-15 years and 1.77 for over 15 years). Moreover, female dermatologists and dermatologists with higher education level and serviced in private settings had lower barrier scores; female dermatologists and dermatologists with more years of aesthetic practice had higher stimulus scores.
UNASSIGNED: Chinese aesthetic dermatologists appear to implement SDM at an active level, with more stimulus and less barriers in SDM implementation. The integration of SDM into clinical practice among dermatologists is beneficial both for patients and dermatologists. Moreover, SDM practice should be strongly promoted and enhanced during medical aesthetics, especially among male dermatologists, dermatologists with less working experience, and those who work at public institutions.

There were many studies evaluating the effect of picosecond (PS) lasers, but no meta-analysis examined the effects of PS laser in the treatment of pigmentary disorders in Asians. The aim of this article was to review the before-after effect of PS laser in Asians for the treatment of pigmentary disorders. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane library were searched for articles published up to May 2020. The evaluations were summarized into a 4-point scale that ranged from <25% (poor), 25%-50% (fair), 50%-75% (good), and 75%-100% (excellent). Effect sizes (ESs) were calculated according to laser wavelengths and lesion types. There were two randomized controlled trials, three single-arm trials, and three case series, with 200 patients. At 3 months after treatment, of all included patients, 3% (95%CI: 1%-6%) were evaluated as poor or worse, 9% (95%CI: 2%-21%) as fair, 29% (95%CI: 12%-50%) as good, and 56% (95%CI: 28%-83%) as excellent. The 532 and 1064, and 755 nm PS lasers had similar ESs across all four response groups. This meta-analysis suggested that 56% of Asian patients who underwent PS laser for the treatment of pigmentary disorders were evaluated as \"excellent\" about the pigment clearance by a dermatologist at least 3 months after treatment.

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has been declared a pandemic. We conducted a systematic review to reveal the contribution of dermatologists in COVID-19 research. Two hundred and ninety-eight articles were included and classified into cutaneous manifestations of COVID-19, operating experience against COVID-19, mechanisms and treatment of COVID-19, disinfection and personal protective equipment (PPE)-related skin diseases, and other topics. The value of these articles and their impact on clinical impact were discussed and we hope that dermatologists can have a better understanding of these areas from this study.