方法:跨文化适应的系统综述。
目的:SOSGOQ2.0被广泛用于评估脊柱转移患者的HRQQOL。由于缺乏方法学质量评价,在常规实践中使用问卷是一个挑战。本研究旨在根据COSMIN指南全面评估SOSGOQ2.0的翻译程序和测量属性。
方法:根据PRISMA指南对文献进行综述。每个翻译过程和不同的文化适应方法根据指南的跨文化适应过程的自我报告措施进行分类,并根据健康测量工具的选择标准,根据共识对已确定研究的方法学质量进行评估。
结果:6篇出版物最终符合纳入标准。至于翻译程序和跨文化适应性的评估,两个改编没有报告翻译和跨文化适应方面的详细信息(综合,回译,专家委员会审查,预测试),因子分析和样本量计算只在两项研究中提到,只有一个适应符合最小样本量标准。关于测量属性的方法学质量评估,所有改编都完成了内部一致性,结构有效性和可靠性。然而,没有适应报告测量误差,只有一个报告响应灵敏度。
结论:我们发现当前适应的方法学质量参差不齐,测量属性结果报告不全面。我们推荐更高质量的德语,意大利和中国适应。
METHODS: systematic review of cross-cultural adaptation.
OBJECTIVE: SOSGOQ 2.0 was widely used to assess the HRQQOL of patients with spinal metastasis. Due to the lack of methodological quality assessment, it is a challenge to use the questionnaire in routine practice. This study aims to comprehensively evaluate the translation procedures and measurement attributes of SOSGOQ 2.0 according to COSMIN
guidelines.
METHODS: The literature was reviewed adhering to the PRISMA
guidelines. Each translation process and different cultural adaptation methods were classified according to the
guidelines for Cross cultural Adaptation Process of Self Reporting Measures, and the methodological quality of the identified research was evaluated according to the
consensus based on the selection criteria of health measurement tools.
RESULTS: 6 publications finally met the inclusion criteria. As for the evaluation of translation procedures and cross-cultural adaptability, two adaptations did not report the detailed information in translation and cross-cultural adaptation (synthesis, back translation, review by expert committee, pre-test), factor analysis and sample size calculation were only mentioned in two studies, and only one adaptation met the minimum sample size standard. Regard to the methodological quality assessment of measurement attributes, all adaptations completed internal consistency, structural effectiveness and reliability. However, none of the adaptations reported measurement errors and only one reported response sensitivity.
CONCLUSIONS: We found that the methodological quality of the current adaptation was uneven, and the report of measurement attribute results was not comprehensive. We recommend higher quality German, Italian and Chinese adaptation.