acute heart failure

急性心力衰竭
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性心力衰竭(AHF)通常由于液体超负荷而导致不利的结果。虽然利尿剂是治疗的基石,乙酰唑胺可以通过减少钠的重吸收来提高利尿效率。与利尿剂治疗相比,我们对乙酰唑胺作为AHF患者的附加治疗效果进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。PubMed,Embase,在Cochrane数据库中搜索随机对照试验(RCT).采用随机效应模型来计算平均差异和风险比。使用R软件进行统计学分析。等级方法用于对证据的确定性进行评级。我们纳入了4个RCTs,634例患者,年龄68至81岁。平均随访3天至34个月,乙酰唑胺在给药48小时后显着增加了利尿(MD899.2mL;95%CI249.5至1549;p<0.01)和利钠(MD72.44mmol/L;95%CI39.4至105.4;p<0.01)。乙酰唑胺的使用与WRF(RR2.4;95%CI0.4~14.2;p=0.3)或全因死亡率(RR1.2;95%CI0.8~1.9;p=0.3)无相关性。干预组的临床充血率明显高于干预组(RR1.35;95%CI1.09至1.68;p=0.01)。乙酰唑胺是AHF患者的有效附加疗法,增加利尿,利钠尿,和临床充血,但与死亡率差异无关.
    Acute heart failure (AHF) often leads to unfavorable outcomes due to fluid overload. While diuretics are the cornerstone treatment, acetazolamide may enhance diuretic efficiency by reducing sodium reabsorption. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on the effects of acetazolamide as an add-on therapy in patients with AHF compared to diuretic therapy. PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane databases were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT). A random-effects model was employed to compute mean differences and risk ratios. Statistical analysis was performed using R software. The GRADE approach was used to rate the certainty of the evidence. We included 4 RCTs with 634 patients aged 68 to 81 years. Over a mean follow-up of 3 days to 34 months, acetazolamide significantly increased diuresis (MD 899.2 mL; 95% CI 249.5 to 1549; p < 0.01) and natriuresis (MD 72.44 mmol/L; 95% CI 39.4 to 105.4; p < 0.01) after 48 h of its administration. No association was found between acetazolamide use and WRF (RR 2.4; 95% CI 0.4 to 14.2; p = 0.3) or all-cause mortality (RR 1.2; 95% CI 0.8 to 1.9; p = 0.3). Clinical decongestion was significantly higher in the intervention group (RR 1.35; 95% CI 1.09 to 1.68; p = 0.01). Acetazolamide is an effective add-on therapy in patients with AHF, increasing diuresis, natriuresis, and clinical decongestion, but it was not associated with differences in mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    几个相互矛盾的综述得出结论,使用环利尿剂与较差的临床和安全性结果相关。因此,本研究旨在探讨托伐普坦辅助常规利尿剂治疗急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的疗效和安全性.
    在PubMed上进行了全面搜索,Embase,ProQuest,EBSCO,和Cochrane图书馆直到2023年5月24日,以确定随机对照试验,比较托伐普坦与常规治疗和安慰剂对AHF患者的影响。纳入试验的质量评估采用Cochrane偏倚风险进行。进行了网络荟萃分析(NMA)以检查托伐普坦的剂量效应。
    共17项研究,18份报告,涉及10039名患者,被选中。托伐普坦附加治疗可显着缓解呼吸困难[24h:RR1.16(1.04,1.29),48小时:RR1.18(1.04,1.33)],48小时内体重减轻[亚洲组,MD-0.93(-1.48,-0.38);非亚洲组,MD-2.76(-2.88,-2.65)],水肿减少[RR1.08(1.02,1.15)],血清钠升高[非亚洲人群,MD3.40(3.02,3.78)],并导致血清肌酐变化[MD-0.10(-0.18,-0.01)]。在死亡率和再住院方面没有观察到显著差异。NMA建议,中间剂量(15毫克/天)可能在24小时内减少呼吸困难方面提供最佳疗效。减少水肿,增加血清钠,降低肾功能恶化(WRF)的发生率。
    总而言之,荟萃分析显示托伐普坦有助于短期缓解充血性症状,钠水平升高,WRF的发生率较低。然而,在长期症状中没有观察到显著的益处,再住院率,和死亡率。托伐普坦的中等剂量可能被认为是各种临床结果的最佳选择。
    https://www.crd.约克。AC.英国/,PROSPERO(CRD42023420288)。
    UNASSIGNED: Several conflicting reviews have concluded that the use of loop diuretics is associated with poorer clinical and safety outcomes. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of tolvaptan as an adjunct to conventional diuretic therapy in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).
    UNASSIGNED: A comprehensive search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, ProQuest, EBSCO, and Cochrane Library until 24 May 2023 to identify randomized controlled trials that compared the effects of tolvaptan with conventional therapy and placebo in patients with AHF. The quality assessment of the included trials was conducted using the Cochrane risk of bias. A network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to examine the dosage effect of tolvaptan.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 17 studies with 18 reports, involving 10,039 patients, were selected. The tolvaptan add-on therapy significantly alleviated dyspnea [24 h: RR 1.16 (1.04, 1.29), 48 h: RR 1.18 (1.04, 1.33)], reduced body weight within 48 h [Asian group, MD -0.93 (-1.48, -0.38); non-Asian group, MD -2.76 (-2.88, -2.65)], reduced edema [RR 1.08 (1.02, 1.15)], increased serum sodium [non-Asian group, MD 3.40 (3.02, 3.78)], and resulted in a change in serum creatinine [MD -0.10 (-0.18, -0.01)]. No significant differences were observed in mortality and rehospitalization. The NMA suggested that an intermediate dosage (15 mg/day) might offer the best efficacy in reducing dyspnea within 24 h, reducing edema, increasing serum sodium, and lowering the incidence of worsening renal function (WRF).
    UNASSIGNED: In conclusion, the meta-analysis showed that tolvaptan contributed to the short-term alleviation of congestive symptoms, elevated sodium levels, and a lower incidence of WRF. However, no significant benefits were observed in long-term symptoms, rehospitalization rates, and mortality. An intermediate dosage of tolvaptan might be considered the optimal choice for various clinical outcomes.
    UNASSIGNED: https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/, PROSPERO (CRD42023420288).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性心力衰竭(AHF)的特征是出现或加剧的症状和体征表明充血或全身灌注不足,源于潜在的结构性或功能性心脏病。静脉环路利尿剂在实现有效的充血和确保临床稳定性方面起着关键作用;这些药物的疗效对于确定患者的住院过程和早期门诊进展至关重要。对利尿剂表现出次优反应或发展为利尿剂抵抗(DR)的个体由于AHF而处于心血管死亡和再入院的升高风险。然而,DR缺乏标准化的定义和诊断标准。早期识别DR患者至关重要,因为他们可能会从更积极的缓解充血策略中受益,以减轻这种抵抗力。利尿,尿液中钠的排泄,作为利尿剂有效性的直接衡量标准。低钠尿症与较差的结果有关。几项研究强调了利钠在各种心力衰竭情况下的预后意义。然而,钠尿和院内DR之间的关系尚未得到广泛研究.观察性研究表明,使用loop利尿剂后利尿不足与利尿剂反应减弱以及死亡率和心力衰竭再住院的可能性增加相关。有必要进一步调查以评估与DR有关的基底尿钠的预测价值,住院结果,和早期门诊心血管事件。这将有助于识别可能对利尿剂治疗反应不佳的患者,并且可能需要替代或更强化的治疗方法。
    Acute heart failure (AHF) is characterized by the emergence or intensification of symptoms and signs indicative of congestion or systemic hypoperfusion, stemming from an underlying structural or functional cardiac disorder. Intravenous loop diuretics play a pivotal role in achieving effective decongestion and ensuring clinical stability; the efficacy of these medications is crucial for determining the patient\'s hospital course and early outpatient progression. Individuals who exhibit a suboptimal response to diuretics or develop diuretic resistance (DR) are at an elevated risk for cardiovascular mortality and readmission due to AHF. However, there is a lack of standardized definition and diagnostic criteria for DR. Early identification of patients with DR is critical, as they may benefit from more aggressive decongestion strategies to mitigate this resistance. Natriuresis, the excretion of sodium in urine, serves as a direct measure of a diuretic\'s effectiveness. Low levels of natriuresis have been linked to poorer outcomes. Several studies have underscored the prognostic significance of natriuresis across various heart failure scenarios. However, the relationship between natriuresis and in-hospital DR has not been extensively studied. Observational research has indicated that inadequate natriuresis following the administration of loop diuretics correlates with a diminished diuretic response and an increased likelihood of mortality and heart failure rehospitalization. Further investigation is warranted to assess the predictive value of basal natriuresis concerning DR, in-hospital outcomes, and early outpatient cardiovascular events. This would help in identifying patients who are likely to respond poorly to diuretic therapy and may require alternative or more intensive treatment approaches.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    COVID-19是一场具有挑战性的疫情,全球数百万人死亡。间质性肺炎引起的急性呼吸衰竭是除血栓前活化和并发症以外的主要死亡原因。肺部超声(LUS)和定点护理超声(POCUS)不仅广泛用于分诊,为了识别,监测肺部受累,同时评估血液动力学状态以及血栓性和出血性并发症,主要是危重病人。由于床边的利用,POCUS得到了越来越多的考虑,可靠性,和可重复性,即使在紧急情况下,特别是在不稳定的患者。在这篇叙述性评论中,我们的目标是根据有关该主题的文献描述COVID-19感染中LUS和POCUS的利用。我们报道了COVID-19肺部感染的LUS模式,CT肺部扫描的诊断准确性,其预后价值,提出的各种分数和协议,并利用POCUS探讨肺外并发症。
    COVID-19 has been a challenging outbreak to face, with millions of deaths among the globe. Acute respiratory failure due to interstitial pneumonia was the leading cause of death other than prothrombotic activation and complications. Lung ultrasound (LUS) and point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) are widely used not only to triage, to identify, and to monitor lungs involvement but also to assess hemodynamic status and thrombotic and hemorrhagic complications, mainly in critically ill patients. POCUS has gained growing consideration due to its bedside utilization, reliability, and reproducibility even in emergency settings especially in unstable patients. In this narrative review, we aim to describe LUS and POCUS utilization in COVID-19 infection based on the literature found on this topic. We reported the LUS patterns of COVID-19 pulmonary infection, the diagnostic accuracy with respect to CT lung scan, its prognostic value, the variety of scores and protocols proposed, and the utilization of POCUS to investigate the extra-lung complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    因为充血的迹象与急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的不良后果有关,尝试使用利尿剂(loop利尿剂,噻嗪类,乙酰唑胺)或机械设备。这些干预措施改善了充血的迹象,但未能有意义地改善患者的症状,提高生活质量,或减少早期再入院或死亡。最近的研究表明,AHF入院后实施指南指导的药物治疗会导致更多的充血和症状改善。生活质量,和结果。因此,对于大多数AHF患者,其症状和充血可以通过环路利尿剂控制,重点应该是快速的指导药物治疗上调.缓解充血,ie,在环状利尿剂中加入二线利尿剂,应保留给那些对环路利尿剂无反应的患者。
    Because signs of congestion are associated with adverse outcomes in patients with acute heart failure (AHF), attempts were made to decongest patients as much as possible with diuretic agents (loop diuretic agents, thiazides, acetazolamide) or mechanical devices. Those interventions improved signs of congestion but failed to meaningfully improve patients\' symptoms, improve quality of life, or reduce early readmissions or deaths. Recent studies have shown that implementation of guideline-directed medical therapies after an AHF admission led to both more decongestion and improved symptoms, quality of life, and outcomes. Therefore, for most patients with AHF whose symptoms and congestion can be controlled with loop diuretic agents, the main focus should be rapid guideline-directed medical therapy uptitration. Enhanced decongestion, ie, adding a second-line diuretic agent to a loop diuretic agent, should be reserved for those patients who do not respond to loop diuretic agents.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:肺超声(LUS)缩短了急诊(ED)未分化呼吸困难患者的急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)的诊断和治疗时间。我们进行了系统评价,以评估LUS在院前环境中对ADHF的诊断准确性和临床影响。
    方法:我们从初始到2023年6月1日对多个数据库进行了关键字搜索。纳入的研究包括院前未分化呼吸困难或疑似ADHF的患者,特别是将院前LUS与金标准进行比较的诊断性研究和与非美国比较组进行的干预性研究。标题和摘要筛选,全文回顾,偏见风险(ROB)评估,数据提取由多位作者完成.并裁决。主要结果是汇集敏感性,特异性,和院前LUS的诊断似然比(LR)。基于ED中先前的ADHF文献,应用0.7的测试处理阈值。干预结果包括死亡率,机械通气,和HF特异性治疗的时间。
    结果:8项诊断研究(n=691)和2项干预研究(n=70)符合纳入标准。没有低ROB的诊断研究。两项干预研究都是关键的-ROB,而不是集合。院前LUS对ADHF的敏感性和特异性分别为86.7%(95CI:70.8%-94.6%)和87.5%(78.2%-93.2%),分别,医生与医生的表现相似护理人员LUS和评估的肺区数量。汇总LR+和LR-分别为7.27(95%CI:3.69-13.10)和0.17(95%CI:0.06-0.34),分别。汇总受试者工作特征曲线下面积为0.922。在观察到的42.4%ADHF患病率(测试前概率),院前LUS阳性超过开始治疗的70%阈值(测试后概率84%,80-88%)。
    结论:LUS在院前诊断ADHF的诊断测试特征与ED相似。基于已发布的测试治疗阈值,院前LUS阳性可能足以启动早期ADHF治疗。需要更多的研究来确定院前LUS的临床影响。
    BACKGROUND: Lung ultrasound (LUS) reduces time to diagnosis and treatment of acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF) in emergency department (ED) patients with undifferentiated dyspnea. We conducted a systematic review to evaluate the diagnostic accuracy and clinical impact of LUS for ADHF in the prehospital setting.
    METHODS: We performed a keyword search of multiple databases from inception through June 1, 2023. Included studies were those enrolling prehospital patients with undifferentiated dyspnea or suspected ADHF, and specifically diagnostic studies comparing prehospital LUS to a gold standard and intervention studies with a non-US comparator group. Title and abstract screening, full text review, risk of bias (ROB) assessments, and data extraction were performed by multiple authors. and adjudicated. The primary outcome was pooled sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic likelihood ratios (LR) for prehospital LUS. A test-treatment threshold of 0.7 was applied based on prior ADHF literature in the ED. Intervention outcomes included mortality, mechanical ventilation, and time to HF specific treatment.
    RESULTS: Eight diagnostic studies (n = 691) and two intervention studies (n = 70) met inclusion criteria. No diagnostic studies were low-ROB. Both intervention studies were critical-ROB, and not pooled. Pooled sensitivity and specificity of prehospital LUS for ADHF were 86.7% (95%CI:70.8%-94.6%) and 87.5% (78.2%-93.2%), respectively, with similar performance by physician vs. paramedic LUS and number of lung zones evaluated. Pooled LR+ and LR- were 7.27 (95% CI: 3.69-13.10) and 0.17 (95% CI: 0.06-0.34), respectively. Area under the summary receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.922. At the observed 42.4% ADHF prevalence (pre-test probability), positive pre-hospital LUS exceeded the 70% threshold to initiate treatment (post-test probability 84%, 80-88%).
    CONCLUSIONS: LUS had similar diagnostic test characteristics for ADHF diagnosis in the prehospital setting as in the ED. A positive prehospital LUS may be sufficient to initiate early ADHF treatment based on published test-treatment thresholds. More studies are needed to determine the clinical impact of prehospital LUS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    充血性肾病是心肾综合征的一种未被重视的表现,其特征是由右侧心力衰竭或腹内高压继发的肾静脉流出减少引起的潜在可逆性肾功能障碍。迄今为止,充血性肾病的组织学诊断标准尚未确定.我们在此报告一例同种异体心脏移植失败后急性肾功能不全,并对相关文献进行综述,以阐明当前对该疾病的理解。我们的病例表明,充血性肾病的组织病理学特征可能是静脉和肾小管周围毛细血管明显扩张,局灶性加重的低度急性肾小管损伤,间质纤维化的小区域,和正常肾小球和主要正常肾小管细胞分化背景下的肾小管萎缩。
    Congestive nephropathy is an underappreciated manifestation of cardiorenal syndrome and is characterized by a potentially reversible kidney dysfunction caused by a reduced renal venous outflow secondary to right-sided heart failure or intra-abdominal hypertension. To date, the histological diagnostic criteria for congestive nephropathy have not been defined. We herein report a case of acute renal dysfunction following cardiac allograft failure and present a review of the relevant literature to elucidate the current understanding of the disease. Our case demonstrated that congestion-driven nephropathy may be histopathologically characterized by markedly dilated veins and peritubular capillaries, focally accentuated low-grade acute tubular damage, small areas of interstitial fibrosis, and tubular atrophy on a background of normal glomeruli and predominantly normal tubular cell differentiation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    贫血和急性心力衰竭(AHF)经常共存。一些已发表的研究调查了AHF患者贫血与全因死亡率和全因心力衰竭事件的关系。但是他们的发现仍然存在争议。本研究旨在评估贫血与AHF之间的关系。我们系统地搜索了PubMed,Medline,Cochrane图书馆,Embase,和Elsevier的ScienceDirect数据库,直到2023年7月30日,并选择了前瞻性或回顾性队列研究来评估AHF的贫血。最终纳入了总共9项试验,涉及29587名AHF患者。汇总分析表明,贫血与全因心力衰竭事件发生率(OR:1.82,95%CI:1.58-2.10,p<0.01)和全因死亡率相关,短期(30天)全因死亡率(OR:1.91,95%CI:1.31-2.79,p<.01)和长期(1年)全因死亡率(OR:1.72,95%CI:1.27-2.32,p<.01)。这项荟萃分析的证据表明,贫血可能是AHF患者全因死亡和全因心力衰竭事件的独立危险因素,并可能强调出院前纠正贫血的重要性。
    Anemia and acute heart failure (AHF) frequently coexist. Several published studies have investigated the association of anemia with all-cause mortality and all-cause heart failure events in AHF patients, but their findings remain controversial. This study is intended to evaluate the relationship between anemia and AHF. We systematically searched PubMed, Medline, the Cochrane Library, Embase, and Elsevier\'s ScienceDirect databases until July 30, 2023, and selected prospective or retrospective cohort studies to evaluate anemia for AHF. A total of nine trials involving 29 587 AHF patients were eventually included. Pooled analyses demonstrated anemia is associated with a higher risk of all-cause heart failure event rate (OR: 1.82, 95% CI: 1.58-2.10, p < .01) and all-cause mortality, both for short-term (30 days) all-cause mortality (OR: 1.91, 95% CI: 1.31-2.79, p < .01) and long-term (1 year) all-cause mortality (OR: 1.72, 95% CI: 1.27-2.32, p < .01). The evidence from this meta-analysis suggested that anemia may be an independent risk factor for all-cause mortality and all-cause heart failure events in patients with AHF and might emphasize the importance of anemia correction before discharge.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性呼吸衰竭(ARF)是一种具有挑战性的疾病,尤其是在紧急情况下,必须经常面对。尤其是在紧急情况下,许多基础疾病可导致ARF,威胁生命的疾病必须及时评估和正确治疗,以避免不良结局.近年来,由于床边使用,护理点超声(POCUS)得到了越来越多的考虑,可靠性和可重复性,即使在紧急情况下,特别是在不稳定的患者。关于POCUS应用于评估ARF的研究已被大量报道,主要是观察性研究显示来自许多不同应用的异质结果。这篇叙述性综述描述了POCUS在面对气道和呼吸威胁生命的情况(如上呼吸道管理)方面的广泛潜力,肺和胸膜病变和膈肌损伤。我们对文献进行了广泛的研究,从主要研究到案例报告,这些报告被认为对ARF中POCUS的实际临床利用有用。由于发现了大量的文献,我们关注的重点是气道和呼吸评估,试图根据急诊ARF的临床护理将证据系统化.进一步研究,可能是试验,应该确定POCUS在临床实践中如何在护理改进标准方面至关重要,患者安全和成本效益分析。
    Acute respiratory failure (ARF) is a challenging condition that clinicians, especially in emergency settings, have to face frequently. Especially in emergency settings, many underlying diseases can lead to ARF and life-threatening conditions have to be promptly assessed and correctly treated to avoid unfavorable outcomes. In recent years, point-of-care ultrasound (POCUS) gained growing consideration due to its bedside utilization, reliability and reproducibility even in emergency settings especially in unstable patients. Research on POCUS application to assess ARF has been largely reported mainly with observational studies showing heterogeneous results from many different applications. This narrative review describes the wide potentiality of POCUS to face airways and breathing life-threatening conditions such as upper airway management, pulmonary and pleural pathologies and diaphragm impairment. We conducted extensive research of the literature to report from major studies to case reports deemed useful in practical clinical utilization of POCUS in ARF. Due to the huge amount of the literature found, we focused on airways and breathing assessment trying to systematize the evidence according to clinical care of ARF in emergency settings. Further studies, possibly trials, should determine how POCUS is crucial in clinical practice in terms of standard of care improvements, patient safety and cost-benefit analysis.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    虽然急性心力衰竭(AHF)是一种常见的疾病与显著的症状相关,发病率和死亡率,诊断,高血压急性心力衰竭(H-AHF)患者的危险分层和治疗在现代医学中仍然是一个挑战.尽管在诊断和治疗方式方面取得了很大进展,这种疾病仍然伴随着很高的住院死亡率(从3.8%到11%)和一年死亡率(从20%到36%).考虑到再住院率很高(前三个月为22%至30%),这种疾病的治疗是对每个国家卫生系统的重大财政打击。这种疾病的特点是在诱发因素的异质性,临床表现,治疗方式和预后。由于H-AHF患者的心脏代偿失调通常发生得很快(在几个小时内),建立快速诊断至关重要。除了建立心力衰竭本身的诊断,有必要看到导致它的根本原因,特别是如果是新的心力衰竭。鉴于高血压是AHF的诱发因素,并且在高达11%的AHF患者中,必须严格控制动脉血压,直到达到目标值,以防止H-AHF的发生,这仍然伴随着较高的早期和长期死亡率。
    Although acute heart failure (AHF) is a common disease associated with significant symptoms, morbidity and mortality, the diagnosis, risk stratification and treatment of patients with hypertensive acute heart failure (H-AHF) still remain a challenge in modern medicine. Despite great progress in diagnostic and therapeutic modalities, this disease is still accompanied by a high rate of both in-hospital (from 3.8% to 11%) and one-year (from 20% to 36%) mortality. Considering the high rate of rehospitalization (22% to 30% in the first three months), the treatment of this disease represents a major financial blow to the health system of each country. This disease is characterized by heterogeneity in precipitating factors, clinical presentation, therapeutic modalities and prognosis. Since heart decompensation usually occurs quickly (within a few hours) in patients with H-AHF, establishing a rapid diagnosis is of vital importance. In addition to establishing the diagnosis of heart failure itself, it is necessary to see the underlying cause that led to it, especially if it is de novo heart failure. Given that hypertension is a precipitating factor of AHF and in up to 11% of AHF patients, strict control of arterial blood pressure is necessary until target values are reached in order to prevent the occurrence of H-AHF, which is still accompanied by a high rate of both early and long-term mortality.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号