acute heart failure

急性心力衰竭
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    较高的血压(BP)变异性(BPV)被证明是心力衰竭(HF)不良心血管结局的有力预测因子。目前尚不清楚低水平耳屏刺激(LLTS)是否会改善急性HF(AHF)的BPV。22例AHF患者(中位数80年,60%)的男性被随机分配到活动组或假手术组,使用耳屏(活动组)或耳垂(假手术组)的耳夹,在5天内每天1小时。在活跃的群体中,标准偏差(SD),LLTS后,SBP的变异系数(CV)和δ显着降低(均p<0.05)。SD的所有变化,刺激前后SBP中的CV和δ在活动组和假手术组之间也存在显着差异(均p<0.05)。这项概念验证研究证明了LLTS对AHF中BPV的有益影响。
    Higher blood pressure (BP) variability (BPV) was shown to be strong predictors of poor cardiovascular outcomes in heart failure (HF). It is currently unknown if low-level tragus stimulation (LLTS) would lead to improvement in BPV in acute HF (AHF). The 22 patients with AHF (median 80 yrs, males 60%) were randomly assigned to active or sham group using an ear clip attached to the tragus (active group) or the earlobe (sham group) for 1 h daily over 5 days. In the active group, standard deviation (SD), coefficient of variation (CV) and δ in SBP were significantly decreased after LLTS (all p < 0.05). All the changes in SD, CV and δ in SBP before and after stimulation were also significantly different between active and sham groups (all p < 0.05). This proof-of-concept study demonstrates the beneficial effects of LLTS on BPV in AHF.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管心力衰竭(HF)患者存在几种生物标志物,它们在常规临床实践中的使用通常受到高成本和有限可用性的限制。
    目的:我们研究了一种人工智能(AI)算法的实用性,该算法分析了打印心电图(ECG),以预测急性HF患者的预后。
    方法:我们回顾性分析了韩国两个三级中心的急性HF患者的前瞻性数据。使用称为定量心电图(QCG)的深度学习系统分析基线心电图,它被训练来检测几种紧急的临床状况,包括休克,心脏骤停,左心室射血分数(LVEF)降低。
    结果:在1254名患者中,53例(4.2%)患者发生院内心脏死亡,这些患者的关键事件QCG评分(QCG-Critical)明显高于幸存者(平均0.57,SD0.23与平均0.29,SD0.20;P<.001)。QCG-Critical评分是调整年龄后院内心源性死亡的独立预测因子,性别,合并症,HF病因/类型,心房颤动,和QRS扩大(调整后优势比[OR]1.68,95%CI1.47-1.92每0.1增加;P<.001),在对超声心动图LVEF和N末端脑钠肽激素原水平进行额外调整后,仍然是一个显著的预测因子(校正OR1.59,95%CI1.36-1.87每0.1增加;P<.001)。在长期随访中,QCG-Critical评分较高(>0.5)的患者死亡率高于QCG-Critical评分较低(<0.25)的患者(校正风险比2.69,95%CI2.14-3.38;P<.001).
    结论:使用QCG-Critical评分预测急性HF患者的预后是可行的,表明这种基于AI的ECG评分可能是这些患者的新生物标志物。
    背景:ClinicalTrials.govNCT01389843;https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01389843。
    BACKGROUND: Although several biomarkers exist for patients with heart failure (HF), their use in routine clinical practice is often constrained by high costs and limited availability.
    OBJECTIVE: We examined the utility of an artificial intelligence (AI) algorithm that analyzes printed electrocardiograms (ECGs) for outcome prediction in patients with acute HF.
    METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed prospectively collected data of patients with acute HF at two tertiary centers in Korea. Baseline ECGs were analyzed using a deep-learning system called Quantitative ECG (QCG), which was trained to detect several urgent clinical conditions, including shock, cardiac arrest, and reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
    RESULTS: Among the 1254 patients enrolled, in-hospital cardiac death occurred in 53 (4.2%) patients, and the QCG score for critical events (QCG-Critical) was significantly higher in these patients than in survivors (mean 0.57, SD 0.23 vs mean 0.29, SD 0.20; P<.001). The QCG-Critical score was an independent predictor of in-hospital cardiac death after adjustment for age, sex, comorbidities, HF etiology/type, atrial fibrillation, and QRS widening (adjusted odds ratio [OR] 1.68, 95% CI 1.47-1.92 per 0.1 increase; P<.001), and remained a significant predictor after additional adjustments for echocardiographic LVEF and N-terminal prohormone of brain natriuretic peptide level (adjusted OR 1.59, 95% CI 1.36-1.87 per 0.1 increase; P<.001). During long-term follow-up, patients with higher QCG-Critical scores (>0.5) had higher mortality rates than those with low QCG-Critical scores (<0.25) (adjusted hazard ratio 2.69, 95% CI 2.14-3.38; P<.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Predicting outcomes in patients with acute HF using the QCG-Critical score is feasible, indicating that this AI-based ECG score may be a novel biomarker for these patients.
    BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01389843; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT01389843.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Letter
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性肾损伤在急性失代偿性心力衰竭患者中很常见。在患有慢性肾脏疾病的急性心力衰竭患者中更常见。肾功能恶化通常定义为血清肌酐升高超过0.3毫克/分升(26.5µmol/L),根据定义,是急性肾损伤的第一阶段。也许急性肾损伤这个术语比肾功能恶化更合适,因为它被肾病学家普遍使用。内科医生,和其他医生。在健康方面,心脏和肾脏相互支持,以维持身体的稳态。在疾病中,心脏和肾脏会对彼此的功能产生不利影响,导致临床进一步恶化。在出现急性心力衰竭和液体超负荷的患者中,利尿剂治疗充血通常会导致血清肌酐升高和急性肾损伤。然而,从长远来看,尽管血清肌酐升高和急性肾损伤,但充血减少仍可提高生存率并阻止住院.重要的是要认识到,由于急性心力衰竭中右侧心脏压力增加而引起的肾静脉充血是肾功能障碍的主要原因,因此,从长远来看,去充血疗法可以改善肾功能。这篇综述提供了一个观点,对可接受的急性肾损伤与减充血治疗,这与提高生存率有关;与由于与脓毒症或肾毒性药物相关的肾小管损伤引起的急性肾损伤相反,这与不良的生存有关。
    Acute kidney injury is common in patients with acute decompensated heart failure. It is more common in patients with acute heart failure who suffer from chronic kidney disease. Worsening renal function is often defined as a rise in serum creatinine of more than 0.3 milligrams per deciliter (26.5 µmol/L), which by definition, is acute kidney injury stage one. Perhaps the term acute kidney injury is more appropriate than worsening renal function as it is used universally by nephrologists, internists, and other medical practitioners. In health, the heart and the kidney support each other to maintain body\'s homeostasis. In disease, the heart and the kidney can adversely affect each other\'s function causing further clinical deterioration. In patients presenting with acute heart failure and fluid overload, therapy with diuretics for decongestion often causes a rise in serum creatinine and acute kidney injury. However, in the longer term the decongestion improves survival and prevents hospital admissions despite rising serum creatinine and acute kidney injury. It is important to realize that renal venous congestion due to increased right sided heart pressures in acute heart failure is a major cause of kidney dysfunction and hence decongestion therapy improves kidney function in the longer term. This review provides a perspective on the acceptable acute kidney injury with decongestion therapy which is associated with improved survival; as opposed to acute kidney injury due to tubular injury related to sepsis or nephrotoxic drugs, which is associated with poor survival.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Editorial
    暂无摘要。
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    关于出现急性冠脉综合征(ACS)的女性的结局,有相互矛盾的报道。
    本研究的目的是检查ACS和急性心力衰竭(HF)患者在发病时30天死亡率的性别差异。
    这是一项纳入国际急性冠脉综合征调查(ISACS-ARCHIVES;NCT04008173)的患者的回顾性研究。急性HF定义为Killip等级≥2。根据ACS表现对参与者进行分层:ST段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)和非ST段抬高型ACS(NSTE-ACS)。使用基于倾向评分的反向倾向加权检查了性别之间入院时30天死亡率和急性HF表现的差异。通过对数尺度上的相互作用检验比较了估计值。
    共包括87,812名患者,其中30,922(35.2%)是女性。STEMI患者(风险比[RR]:1.65;95%CI:1.56-1.73)和NSTE-ACS患者(RR:1.18;95%CI:1.09-1.28;P交互作用<0.001)的女性死亡率高于男性。与男性STEMI患者相比,女性急性HF更为常见(RR:1.24;95%CI:1.20-1.29),而NSTE-ACS患者则不常见(RR:1.02;95%CI:0.97-1.08)(P交互作用<0.001)。急性HF的存在增加了男女的死亡风险(比值比:6.60;95%CI:6.25-6.98)。
    在出现ACS的患者中,女性死亡率较高。在医院就诊时出现急性HF会增加男女死亡的风险。患有STEMI的女性更有可能出现急性HF,在某种程度上,解释死亡率的性别差异。这些发现可能有助于改善特定性别的个性化风险分层。
    UNASSIGNED: There have been conflicting reports regarding outcomes in women presenting with an acute coronary syndrome (ACS).
    UNASSIGNED: The objective of the study was to examine sex-specific differences in 30-day mortality in patients with ACS and acute heart failure (HF) at the time of presentation.
    UNASSIGNED: This was a retrospective study of patients included in the International Survey of Acute Coronary Syndromes-ARCHIVES (ISACS-ARCHIVES; NCT04008173). Acute HF was defined as Killip classes ≥2. Participants were stratified according to ACS presentation: ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation ACS (NSTE-ACS). Differences in 30-day mortality and acute HF presentation at admission between sexes were examined using inverse propensity weighting based on the propensity score. Estimates were compared by test of interaction on the log scale.
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 87,812 patients were included, of whom 30,922 (35.2%) were women. Mortality was higher in women compared with men in those presenting with STEMI (risk ratio [RR]: 1.65; 95% CI: 1.56-1.73) and NSTE-ACS (RR: 1.18; 95% CI: 1.09-1.28; P interaction <0.001). Acute HF was more common in women when compared to men with STEMI (RR: 1.24; 95% CI: 1.20-1.29) but not in those with NSTE-ACS (RR: 1.02; 95% CI: 0.97-1.08) (P interaction <0.001). The presence of acute HF increased the risk of mortality for both sexes (odds ratio: 6.60; 95% CI: 6.25-6.98).
    UNASSIGNED: In patients presenting with ACS, mortality is higher in women. The presence of acute HF at hospital presentation increases the risk of mortality in both sexes. Women with STEMI are more likely to present with acute HF and this may, in part, explain sex differences in mortality. These findings may be helpful to improve sex-specific personalized risk stratification.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    自我报告的运动能力是稳定的非卧床心脏病和肺病患者的公认预后指标。
    作者旨在直接比较使用杜克活动状态指数(DASI)量化的自我报告的运动能力与建立的客观疾病严重程度标志物B型利钠肽(BNP)在急诊科出现急性呼吸困难的患者中的预后准确性。
    DASI是在一项前瞻性多中心诊断研究中获得的,该研究招募了未选择的急性呼吸困难患者到急诊科就诊。使用C指数评估DASI和BNP对90天和720天全因死亡率的预后准确性。
    在符合此分析条件的1,019名患者中,75(7%)和297(29%)患者在就诊后90和720天内死亡,分别。90天和720天死亡率的未调整风险比(HRs)和多变量调整风险比(aHRs)从第四个(最佳自我报告运动能力)到第一个DASI四分位数(最差自我报告运动能力)连续增加。对于720天的死亡率,第一四分位数与第四四分位数的HR为9.1(95%CI,5.5-14.9)vs(aHR:6.1,95%CI:3.7-10.1),第二四分位数为6.4(95%CI:3.9-10.6)vs(AHR:4.4,95%CI:2.6-7.3),而第三个四分位数的HR为3.2(95%CI:1.9-5.5)vs(aHR:2.4,95%CI:1.4-4.0)。DASI评分的预后准确性较高,并且高于BNP浓度(720天死亡率C指数:0.67vs0.62;P=0.024)。
    使用DASI对自我报告的主观运动能力进行量化可提供较高的预后准确性,并可能有助于医生进行风险分层。(急性呼吸短促评估基础[BASELV]研究[BASELV];NCT01831115)。
    UNASSIGNED: Self-reported exercise capacity is a well-established prognostic measure in stable ambulatory patients with cardiac and pulmonary disease.
    UNASSIGNED: The authors aimed to directly compare the prognostic accuracy of quantified self-reported exercise capacity using the Duke Activity Status Index (DASI) with the established objective disease-severity marker B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) in patients presenting with acute dyspnea to the emergency department.
    UNASSIGNED: The DASI was obtained in a prospective multicenter diagnostic study recruiting unselected patients presenting with acute dyspnea to the emergency department. The prognostic accuracy of DASI and BNP for 90-day and 720-day all-cause mortality was evaluated using C-index.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 1,019 patients eligible for this analysis, 75 (7%) and 297 (29%) patients died within 90 and 720 days after presentation, respectively. Unadjusted hazard ratios (HRs) and multivariable adjusted hazard ratios (aHRs) for 90- and 720-day mortality increased continuously from the fourth (best self-reported exercise capacity) to the first DASI quartile (worst self-reported exercise capacity). For 720-day mortality the HR of the first quartile vs the fourth was 9.1 (95% CI, 5.5-14.9) vs (aHR: 6.1, 95% CI: 3.7-10.1), of the second quartile 6.4 (95% CI: 3.9-10.6) vs (aHR: 4.4, 95% CI: 2.6-7.3), while of the third quartile the HR was 3.2 (95% CI: 1.9-5.5) vs (aHR: 2.4, 95% CI: 1.4-4.0). The prognostic accuracy of the DASI score was high, and higher than that of BNP concentrations (720-day mortality C-index: 0.67 vs 0.62; P = 0.024).
    UNASSIGNED: Quantification of self-reported subjective exercise capacity using the DASI provides high prognostic accuracy and may aid physicians in risk stratification. (Basics in Acute Shortness of Breath EvaLuation [BASEL V] Study [BASEL V]; NCT01831115).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在CLOROTIC(Loop与噻嗪类利尿剂联合治疗失代偿性心力衰竭)试验中,在呋塞米中加入氢氯噻嗪(HCTZ)可改善急性心力衰竭(AHF)患者的利尿剂反应。
    目的:这项工作旨在评估这些结果是否在左心室射血分数(LVEF)范围内存在差异。
    方法:这是对随机,双盲,安慰剂对照CLOROTIC试验纳入230例AHF患者,除静脉注射呋塞米方案外,还接受HCTZ或安慰剂治疗.评估LVEF对主要和次要结局的影响。
    结果:LVEF中位数为55%:166(72%)患者的LVEF>40%,64例(28%)LVEF≤40%。LVEF较低的患者更年轻,更有可能是男性,缺血性心脏病的患病率较高,并有较高的利钠肽水平。在呋塞米中加入HCTZ与96小时中72小时的最大体重减轻有关,更好的利尿剂反应指标,与安慰剂相比,24小时利尿更大,根据LVEF类别(使用2个LVEF截止点:40%和50%)或LVEF作为连续变量(所有P值均不显著)没有显着差异。在死亡率方面,添加HCTZ没有观察到显著差异,重新住院,或安全终点(肾功能受损,低钠血症,和低钾血症)在2个LVEF组中(所有P值均无统计学意义)。
    结论:在静脉呋塞米中加入HCTZ似乎是改善AHF利尿剂反应的有效策略,而不根据基线LVEF改变治疗效果。(Loop与噻嗪类利尿剂联合治疗失代偿性心力衰竭[CLOROTIC],NCT01647932;随机化,双盲,多中心研究,评估Loop与噻嗪类利尿剂的组合与Loop利尿剂与安慰剂的安全性和有效性,EudraCT编号2013-001852-36)。
    BACKGROUND: The addition of hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) to furosemide in the CLOROTIC (Combining Loop with Thiazide Diuretics for Decompensated Heart Failure) trial improved the diuretic response in patients with acute heart failure (AHF).
    OBJECTIVE: This work aimed to evaluate if these results differ across the spectrum of left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
    METHODS: This post hoc analysis of the randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled CLOROTIC trial enrolled 230 patients with AHF to receive either HCTZ or a placebo in addition to an intravenous furosemide regimen. The influence of LVEF on primary and secondary outcomes was evaluated.
    RESULTS: The median LVEF was 55%: 166 (72%) patients had LVEF >40%, and 64 (28%) had LVEF ≤40%. Patients with a lower LVEF were younger, more likely to be male, had a higher prevalence of ischemic heart disease, and had higher natriuretic peptide levels. The addition of HCTZ to furosemide was associated with the greatest weight loss at 72 of 96 hours, better metrics of diuretic response, and greater 24-hour diuresis compared with placebo, with no significant differences according to the LVEF category (using 2 LVEF cutoff points: 40% and 50%) or LVEF as a continuous variable (all P values were insignificant). There were no significant differences observed with the addition of HCTZ in terms of mortality, rehospitalizations, or safety endpoints (impaired renal function, hyponatremia, and hypokalemia) among the 2 LVEF groups (all P values were insignificant).
    CONCLUSIONS: Adding HCTZ to intravenous furosemide seems to be effective strategy for improving diuretic response in AHF without treatment effect modification according to baseline LVEF. (Combining Loop with Thiazide Diuretics for Decompensated Heart Failure [CLOROTIC], NCT01647932; Randomized, double blinded, multicenter study, to asses Safety and Efficacy of the Combination of Loop With Thiazide-type Diuretics vs Loop diuretics with placebo in Patients With Decompensated, EudraCT Number 2013-001852-36).
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    心肾综合征(CRS)1型定义为急性失代偿性心力衰竭(ADHF)的急性肾损伤(AKI),由于不同的定义而变得复杂。最近,提出了更精确的CRS类型1定义,强制并发AKI和未改善的心力衰竭(HF)的迹象。我们的研究探讨了发病率,预测因子,在这个新定义下,ADHF中AKI的长期结果。
    对ADHF患者的前瞻性观察研究分为CRS1型,伪CRS,和非AKI组,随访12个月。1型CRS涉及AKI伴临床充血,而假性CRS包括伴有临床充血的AKI(临床充血评分<2)。主要结局是1年复合死亡率或HF再住院。
    在250名连续的ADHF患者中,46.0%发展为1型CRS;慢性肾脏病(CKD)和血尿素氮是显著的危险因素(比值比,1.37;p=0.002,OR,1.05;p<0.001,分别)。与假CRS组相比,CRS1型组显示出AKI发展和血清肌酐峰值的时间更短(1天与4天和2天vs.4天,分别)。12个月时,1型CRS组的死亡率或HF再住院和CKD进展的复合结局明显高于假CRS和非AKI组(63.5%vs.31.7%与36.1%,p<0.001;28.1%vs.16.2%vs.11.4%,分别为p=0.024)。
    区分CRS类型1和伪CRS至关重要,强调短期和长期结果的显著差异。值得注意的是,假性CRS表现出与无AKI患者相当的长期心血管和肾脏结局.
    UNASSIGNED: Cardiorenal syndrome (CRS) type 1 defined as acute kidney injury (AKI) in acute decompensated heart failure (ADHF), is complicated due to diverse definitions. Recently, a more precise CRS type 1 definition was proposed, mandating concurrent AKI and signs of unimproved heart failure (HF). Our study explores the incidence, predictors, and long-term outcomes of AKI in ADHF under this new definition.
    UNASSIGNED: A prospective observation study of ADHF patients categorized into the CRS type 1, pseudo-CRS, and non-AKI groups, followed for 12 months. CRS type 1 involved AKI with clinical congestion, while pseudo-CRS included AKI with clinical decongestion (clinical congestion score <2). The primary outcome was a 1-year composite of mortality or HF rehospitalization.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 250 consecutive ADHF patients, 46.0% developed CRS type 1; chronic kidney disease (CKD) and blood urea nitrogen were significant risk factors (odds ratios, 1.37; p = 0.002 and OR, 1.05; p < 0.001, respectively). The CRS type 1 group exhibited shorter times to AKI development and peak serum creatinine than the pseudo-CRS group (1 day vs. 4 days and 2 days vs. 4 days, respectively). At 12 months, composite outcomes of mortality or HF rehospitalization and CKD progression were significantly higher in the CRS type 1 group than in the pseudo-CRS and non-AKI groups (63.5% vs. 31.7% vs. 36.1%, p < 0.001; 28.1% vs. 16.2% vs. 11.4%, p = 0.024, respectively).
    UNASSIGNED: Distinguishing between CRS type 1 and pseudo-CRS is vital, highlighting significant disparities in short-term and long-term outcomes. Notably, pseudo-CRS exhibits comparable long-term cardiovascular and renal outcomes to those without AKI.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    急性心力衰竭(PUSH-AHF)的实用尿钠基算法研究,2023年8月发表的这项研究是第一个将利尿剂引导的急性心力衰竭伴充血患者(基于局部尿钠测量)与标准治疗进行比较的随机临床试验.根据他们的试验结果,作者得出的结论是,利尿利尿剂引导下利尿剂治疗是安全的,并且在不影响长期临床结局的情况下改善了利尿利尿和利尿.最初的PUSH-AHF试验包括有关肾脏结局的有限信息,并使临床医生对钠尿引导的充血如何影响患者的肾功能提出了重要问题。2024年5月12日,在2024年HFA-ESC年度大会上,KevinDamman博士对试验的肾脏结果进行了深入探索,二次分析,PUSH-AHF试验中的肾功能。这篇综述通过考虑其来源的原始试验的历史,并特别解释了对其肾脏结局进行密切研究的必要性,从而将子研究结果纳入了背景。它强调了PUSH-AHF中肾功能对临床实践的潜在影响以及心脏病学研究界应该考虑的未来方向。
    The Pragmatic Urinary Sodium-based algoritHm in Acute Heart Failure (PUSH-AHF) study, published in August of 2023, was the first randomized clinical trial to compare natriuresis-guided decongestion (based on spot urinary sodium measurement) to standard of care in patients with acute heart failure with congestion receiving loop diuretic therapy. Based on results from their trial, the authors concluded that natriuresis-guided loop diuretic treatment was safe and improved natriuresis and diuresis without impacting long-term clinical outcomes. The original PUSH-AHF trial included limited information about renal outcomes and left clinicians with important questions about how natriuresis-guided decongestion might affect their patients\' renal function. On May 12, 2024, however, at the 2024 Annual Congress of the HFA-ESC, Dr. Kevin Damman provided an in-depth exploration of renal outcomes from the trial when he presented a pre-specified, secondary analysis, renal function in the PUSH-AHF trial. This review puts the sub-study findings into context by considering the history of the original trial from which they came from and explaining the need for a close study of its renal outcomes particularly. It highlights the potential impact of renal function in PUSH-AHF on clinical practice and future directions that should be considered by the cardiology research community.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号