UNASSIGNED: Uveitis, a notable cause of severe visual impairment, is frequently characterized as infectious or noninfectious autoimmune uveitis (AU), the latter of which is commonly associated with younger individuals and systemic diseases. Despite the condition\'s widespread impact, there are substantial gaps in the comprehension of its pathogenesis, clinical presentation, and therapeutic response, particularly concerning systemic disease-associated uveitis.
UNASSIGNED: The current study aims to bridge these gaps through an extensive examination of demographic and clinical features in AU patients, thereby informing future research, and therapeutic strategies, and improving patient outcomes.
UNASSIGNED: This retrospective observational study analyzed 261 patients with systemic disease-associated uveitis from January 2018 to December 2022 in Damascus, Syria. With diagnoses made using the Standardization of Uveitis Nomenclature Working Group Criteria, the study evaluated tailored treatment efficacy at the 24-month post-treatment mark, alongside comprehensive ophthalmic examinations, laboratory evaluations, and radiographic assessments.
UNASSIGNED: In our study, included 87 patients with Systemic Disease-Associated Autoimmune Uveitis (SDA-AU). Women represented 64.36% of this group, and the mean age at diagnosis was 39.8±17.9 years (range 7-71) for men and 43.8±15.4 years (range 11-69). The most reported symptom was a painful red eye (52.87%). The onset of symptoms was sudden for 32.18% of patients, while 67.81% reported gradual development. Complications occurred in 33.33% of patients, including cataracts (41.37% of those with complications) and glaucoma (17.24%). Laboratory evaluations showed elevated inflammation markers in 66.66% of patients. Upon the 24-month assessment, 48.27% of patients achieved complete remission, 37.93% showed significant improvement, while disease worsened in 13.79% of cases.
UNASSIGNED: Our findings demonstrated that the presentation of AU in this cohort frequently precedes the diagnosis of systemic diseases, affirming the vital role of an early and accurate diagnosis of uveitis for the detection of underlying systemic conditions. In conclusion, our study underlines the significance of a comprehensive and multidisciplinary approach in the management of SD-AU, leading to improved prognosis and quality of life for patients.

UNASSIGNED: To investigate the role of the chemokines CXCL13, CXCL10 and CXCL8 in the diagnosis of ocular- and neurosyphilis by examining the serum, aqueous humour (AH) and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) of patients with ocular syphilis.
UNASSIGNED: An observational descriptive study was performed prospectively at Tygerberg Academic Hospital in Cape Town, South Africa from 1 February 2018 till 31 January 2021 which enrolled 23 participants. 14 Patients were male and 9 female, 15 patients were HIV positive, and all patients were newly diagnosed with ocular syphilis. Upon diagnosis of ocular syphilis, the HIV status of each patient was determined, and 3 samples (AH, serum and CSF) were collected to measure the levels of CXCL13, CXCL10 and CXCL8 in each. All patients were treated with 14 days of intravenous Penicillin G and topical corticosteroid drops for uveitis.
UNASSIGNED: The mean concentrations of all 3 biomarkers were higher in the AH and CSF than in the serum. The mean concentrations of the 3 measured biomarkers were markedly different when comparing both AH and CSF levels to serum levels. The level of CXCL13 measured in the AH correlated well with the concentrations found in the CSF of patients with neurosyphilis. In patients with neurosyphilis, mean AH levels of CXCL13 and CXCL10 were markedly higher than in serum while mean CSF levels of CXCL10 were also markedly higher than in serum. Also, the AH/serum ratio of CXCL13 and CXCL10, as well as the CSF/serum ratio of CXCL10, was much higher in patients with neurosyphilis than without. In patients with HIV infection, mean AH CXCL13 levels were much higher than in patients without HIV infection.
UNASSIGNED: The levels of CXCL13, CXCL10 and CXCL8 in the AH of patients with neurosyphilis are similar to previously reported levels in the CSF of patients with neurosyphilis and can potentially be an adjunct in the diagnosis of ocular syphilis. Patients with ocular syphilis who tested negative for neurosyphilis with conventional CSF testing showed features of neurosyphilis when analysing the CSF chemokines.

UNASSIGNED: To assess the risk for uveitis, pseudophakic cystoid macular edema (PCME), and posterior capsular opacification (PCO) associated with the use of pupil expansion devices in cataract surgery.
UNASSIGNED: A retrospective comparative cohort study.
UNASSIGNED: Patients who underwent routine cataract surgery with and without pupil expansion devices at the Department of Ophthalmology, Bristol Eye Hospital, UK, between January 2008 and December 2017.
UNASSIGNED: This study included 39,460 eyes operated without a pupil expansion device and 699 eyes operated with the device. Odds ratios for uveitis and PCME when using a pupil expansion device were calculated using univariate and multivariate regression analysis, having age, gender, diabetes, pseudoexfoliation, and pupil expansion device as independent variables. Multivariate Cox regression controlling for age and gender was used to estimate hazard ratios (HR) for Nd : YAG laser capsulotomies.
UNASSIGNED: Postoperative uveitis and PCME were reported in 3.9% and 2.7% of the eyes operated with a pupil expansion device compared to 2.3% and 1.3% operated without the device (p=0.005 and p=0.002, respectively). In univariate regression analysis, eyes with pupil expansion devices showed a higher risk of postoperative uveitis or PMCE after cataract surgery (OR 1.88, 95%CI 1.39-2.55, p<0.001). In multivariate regression analysis, the risk for PMCE was greater among diabetic patients and in eyes with a pupil expansion device than in those without (OR 1.50, 95%CI 1.24-1.83, P<0.001; OR 1.90, 95%CI 1.16-3.11, P=0.01). In Cox regression analysis adjusted for the patient\'s age and gender, the use of a pupil expansion device was associated with higher Nd : YAG laser capsulotomy rates (HR 1.316, 95%CI 1.011-1.714, P=0.041).
UNASSIGNED: In our large cohort study, the use of pupil expansion devices in cataract surgery was associated with an increased risk of major postoperative complications. Effective anti-inflammatory treatment and follow-up are warranted in eyes operated with a pupil expansion device.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the incidence of noninfectious uveitis in skin melanoma or lung cancer patients who received BRAF inhibitors with that in those who received immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) or conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy.
METHODS: Nationwide population-based retrospective clinical cohort study METHODS: From the Health Insurance Review and Assessment Service database of South Korea, we retrospectively defined 77,323 patients with skin melanoma or lung cancer who received BRAF inhibitor therapy (BRAF inhibitor-exposed group; n = 396), ICIs (ICI-exposed group; n = 22,474), or conventional cytotoxic chemotherapy (unexposed group; n = 54,453). We calculated the 1-year cumulative incidence of noninfectious uveitis in each group from the first day of BRAF inhibitor, ICI, or cytotoxic agent administration.
RESULTS: During the first year of treatment initiation, the cumulative incidence of uveitis was 0.33%, 0.35%, and 2.27% in the unexposed, ICI-exposed, and BRAF inhibitor-exposed groups, respectively. Adjusted hazard ratios (aHR) indicated a 7.52-fold and 5.68-fold increased risk of uveitis in the BRAF inhibitor-exposed group compared with that in the unexposed and ICI-exposed groups (95% confidence interval [CI] 3.83-14.75, P < 0.001 and 95% CI 2.81-11.47, P < 0.001, respectively). After 1:4 propensity score matching, aHRs showed a 35.51-fold and 15.80-fold increased risk (95% CI 4.49-280.48, P = 0.001 and 95% CI 1.76-141.00, P = 0.014) of uveitis and severe uveitis, respectively, in the BRAF inhibitor-exposed versus unexposed patients. Crossover analysis within the BRAF inhibitor-exposed group showed a 3.71-fold increase in uveitis risk during 1-year post index date in comparison with 1-year prior to index date (95% CI 1.03-13.40, P = 0.046). In the BRAF inhibitor-exposed group, female sex, chronic kidney disease, and melanoma were associated with a trend of increased, albeit nonsignificant, risk of uveitis.
CONCLUSIONS: Melanoma or lung cancer patients treated with BRAF inhibitors showed significantly higher risk of noninfectious uveitis than patients treated with conventional cytotoxic drugs or ICIs. These findings emphasize the importance of pretreatment patient education on BRAF-inhibitor-associated uveitis risk to enable prompt ophthalmic evaluation and treatment if symptoms arise during drug administration.

BACKGROUND: Microscopic colitis (MC) is an inflammatory disorder of the colon. To date, the relationship between inflammatory eye diseases and MC is unclear.
OBJECTIVE: To assess whether inflammatory eye disease (iridocyclitis and episcleritis) is a risk factor for MC.
METHODS: We conducted a nationwide matched case control study in Sweden leveraging the ESPRESSO-study (a Swedish database containing data on all biopsies from the gastrointestinal tract from 1965 to 2017). In total, we identified 14,338 patients with biopsy-verified MC (diagnosed from 1981 to 2017). Patients with MC were matched (by age, sex, county and year of birth) with 68,753 controls from the general population and the occurrence of preceding inflammatory eye diseases (defined as diagnosis of episcleritis or iridocyclitis) in the two groups was compared. Multivariable adjusted odds ratios (aORs) were calculated using conditional logistic regression conditioned on the matching variables.
RESULTS: A majority of patients with MC were women (71.9%) and the median age at MC diagnosis was 63.3 years (interquartile range (IQR) = 50.7-72.6). Some 225 (1.6%) MC patients had an earlier record of inflammatory eye disease compared with 614 (0.9%) in controls. These figures corresponded to an aOR of 1.77 (95% CI = 1.52-2.07) for inflammatory eye diseases in patients with MC. Compared to siblings, the aOR for previous inflammatory eye diseases in MC was 1.52 (95% CI = 1.17-1.98) and patients treated with budesonide, as a proxy for clinically significant disease, had a somewhat higher aOR for previous inflammatory eye diseases.
CONCLUSIONS: Inflammatory eye diseases are more common in patients subsequently being diagnosed with MC. Our findings highlight that these conditions may have shared causes and inflammatory pathways and are of clinical interest to gastroenterologists, ophthalmologists and general practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Screening for syphilis increasingly relies on positive treponemal rather than nontreponemal tests (rapid plasma reagin [RPR]). We compared ocular syphilis in patients with nonreactive versus positive RPR.
METHODS: We conducted a retrospective observational cohort study of ocular syphilis treated at two New England hospitals 1996-2021 based on ophthalmologist-diagnosed eye findings and positive treponemal serology, regardless of RPR. We excluded patients with alternative diagnoses. We categorized RPR into nonreactive RPR, low-titer RPR (<1:8), and high-titer RPR (≥1:8) and compared early and long-term response to therapy.
RESULTS: Our sample included 115 patients with ocular syphilis (median follow-up 2.5 years): 25 (22%) nonreactive RPR, 21 (18%) low-titer RPR, 69 (60%) high-titer RPR. Compared with nonreactive and low-titer RPR, people with high-titer RPR were younger (mean 47 years, p<0.001), more likely male (93%, p<0.001) and more likely to be living with HIV (49%, p<0.001). People with nonreactive and low-titer RPR were less likely than high-titer RPR to have posterior/panuveitis (32% and 29% versus 75%, p<0.001) or abnormal CSF (26% and 35% versus 75%, p<0.001), and more likely to present with chronic eye findings (20% and 29% versus 1%, p<0.001). In long-term follow up, eye findings improved and did not recur in most patients (62% nonreactive, 68% low-titer, 96% high-titer RPR); improved but recurred in 29%, 11%, and 4%, respectively; and were stable in 10%, 21%, and 0%, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with ocular syphilis and nonreactive RPR are similar to patients with low-titer RPR, and antibiotic therapy is beneficial in most.

This study aimed to evaluate the risk of uveitis, one of the most common ocular manifestations of COVID-19, in individuals with a history of uveitis and COVID-19 infection while discriminating the effects of COVID-19 infection and vaccinations. We analyzed nationwide data from 235,228 individuals with a history of uveitis prior to COVID-19 infection and evaluated incidences and hazard ratios (HRs) of post-COVID-19 uveitis for different post-infection periods, including early- (within 30 days) and delayed-onset ones. The cumulative incidences of post-infection uveitis at 3, 6, and 12 months were calculated as 8.5%, 11.8%, and 14.0%, respectively. The HR of post-COVID-19 uveitis was 1.21 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.07-1.37) and was particularly higher in the early-onset period (1.42, 95% CI: 1.24-1.61). Vaccinated individuals showed a modestly elevated risk of uveitis relative to pre-infection, while unvaccinated ones exhibited substantially higher risks in the early-onset period: the HR of post-infection uveitis before vaccination was 3.61 (95% CI: 1.35-9.66), whereas after vaccination, it was 1.21 (95% CI: 1.05-1.39). COVID-19 infection was associated with a higher risk of uveitis, which was mitigated by vaccination. Vigilance in the monitoring of uveitis is warranted for recently COVID-19-infected individuals with a history of uveitis, particularly unvaccinated individuals.

UNASSIGNED: The aim of this study was to evaluate the prevalence, type and treatment outcomes of ocular involvement in patients with brucellosis.
UNASSIGNED: This prospective, single-center study enrolled patients admitted to the infectious disease outpatient clinic with diagnosed brucellosis between July 15, 2022 and July 15, 2023. Diagnosis was based on clinical symptoms and a standard Brucella tube agglutination test (≥1/160) or a positive blood culture. Ophthalmologic examinations were performed at baseline and in the first month of treatment. Third and sixth month follow-up examinations were also performed for patients with ocular findings.
UNASSIGNED: Ocular involvement occurred in 60 (24.8%) of 242 patients. Conjunctivitis was the most common ocular involvement and was observed in 39 patients (16.1%). Uveitis was the second most common ocular involvement in 14 patients (5.8%). Scleritis was the least common ocular involvement and was observed in only one patient. Patients with ocular involvement were older (p = 0.027) and had higher rates of weight loss and spondylodiscitis (p = 0.044 and 0.001, respectively). Among laboratory parameters, erythrocyte sedimentation rate and lactate dehydrogenase levels were significantly higher in patients with ocular involvement (p = 0.001 and 0.036, respectively). There were no significant differences in other demographic, clinical, and laboratory characteristics between patients with and without ocular involvement. In 56 (93.3%) patients, the ocular findings improved during the follow-up examination.
UNASSIGNED: Brucellosis, a systemic infection, can manifest with ocular involvement. Early detection and treatment through ophthalmological examination are crucial in managing brucellosis.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of methotrexate (MTX) and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) in achieving corticosteroid-sparing control of uveitis in patients with Vogt-Koyanagi-Harada (VKH) disease.
METHODS: A subanalysis of patients with VKH from the First-line Antimetabolites as Steroid-sparing Treatment (FAST) Uveitis Trial, a randomized, observer-masked, comparative effectiveness trial, with comparisons by treatment (MTX versus MMF) and disease stage (acute versus chronic). Individuals with noninfectious uveitis were placed on a standardized corticosteroid taper and block randomized 1:1 to either 25mg weekly oral MTX or 1.5g twice daily oral MMF. The primary outcome was treatment success defined by corticosteroid-sparing control of uveitis at 6 months. Additional outcomes included change in best spectacle-corrected visual acuity (BSCVA), retinal central subfield thickness (CST), and resolution of serous retinal detachment (SRD).
RESULTS: Ninety-three out of 216 enrolled patients had VKH; 49 patients were randomized to MTX and 44 to MMF, of which 85 patients (46 on MTX, 39 on MMF) contributed to the primary outcome. There was no significant difference in treatment success by antimetabolite (80.4% for MTX compared to 64.1% for MMF; P=.12) or in BSCVA improvement (P=.78). Methotrexate was superior to MMF in reducing CST (P=.003) and resolving SRD (P=.02). There was no significant difference in treatment success by disease stage (P=.25), but patients with acute VKH had greater improvement in BSCVA (P<.001) and reduction of CST (P=.02) than chronic VKH patients.
CONCLUSIONS: MTX and MMF have comparable outcomes as corticosteroid-sparing immunosuppressive therapies for VKH. Visual acuity improvement was greater in acute vs chronic VKH.
BACKGROUND: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT00182929.

OBJECTIVE: Leptospirosis is a waterborne zoonotic disease prevalent in tropical regions, causing significant morbidity and mortality. It can involve any organ in its primary stage, and uveitis is its late complication. While advanced laboratory diagnosis is available only in tertiary care centers globally, a cost-effective bedside assessment of clinical signs and their scoring could offer a provisional diagnosis.
OBJECTIVE: To analyze the diagnostic potential of demographic and clinical signs in a large cohort of serologically confirmed leptospiral uveitis patients.
METHODS: In this retrospective study, demographic and clinical parameters of 876 seropositive leptospiral uveitis patients and 1042 nonleptospiral uveitis controls were studied. Multivariable logistic regression analysis with bootstrap confidence interval (CI) characterized the diagnostic predictors. The performance of the model was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating curve (AUROC).
RESULTS: Presence of nongranulomatous uveitis (odds ratio [OR] = 6.9), hypopyon (OR = 4.6), vitreous infiltration with membranous opacities (OR = 4.3), bilateral involvement (OR = 4), panuveitis (OR = 3.3), vasculitis (OR = 1.9), disc hyperemia (OR = 1.6), absence of retinochoroiditis (OR = 15), and absence of cystoid macular edema (OR = 8.9) emerged as predictive parameters. The AUROC value was 0.86 with 95% CI of 0.846-0.874. At a cut-off score of 40, the sensitivity and specificity were 79.5 and 78.4, respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: The study demonstrates that ocular signs can serve as diagnostic predictors for leptospiral uveitis, enabling primary care ophthalmologists to make bedside diagnosis. This can be further confirmed by laboratory methods available at tertiary care centers.