Transarterial chemoembolization

经动脉化疗栓塞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    身体成分评估(BCA)参数最近已被确定为肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的相关预后因素。在这里,我们的目的是探讨BCA参数在肝癌患者行经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)预后预测中的作用。
    这项回顾性多中心研究包括2010-2020年期间在六个三级护理中心接受TACE的总共754名未经治疗的HCC患者。进行了基于全自动人工智能的腹腔组织组成的定量3D体积测量,以评估骨骼肌体积(SM)。总脂肪组织(TAT),肌内和肌间脂肪组织,内脏脂肪组织,和介入前计算机断层扫描的皮下脂肪组织(SAT)。将BCA参数标准化为腹腔的切片数。我们评估了BCA参数对中位总生存期的影响,并进行了多变量分析,包括确定的生存期估计值。
    单变量生存分析显示,低SM(p<0.001)预测了受损的中位总生存期,高TAT体积(p=0.013),和高SAT容量(p=0.006)。在多变量生存分析中,SM仍然是一个独立的预后因素(p=0.039),而TAT和SAT卷不再显示预测能力。在BCLCB期患者的亚组分析中证实了SM的这种预测作用。
    SM是生存预测的独立预后因素。因此,将SM整合到新型评分系统中可能会改善生存预测和临床决策.需要完全自动化的方法来促进这种成像生物标志物在日常生活中的实施。
    身体成分评估参数,尤其是骨骼肌体积,已被确定为许多疾病和治疗的相关预后因素。在这项研究中,骨骼肌体积已被确定为肝细胞癌患者经肝动脉化疗栓塞的独立预后因素。因此,作为元参数的骨骼肌体积可在整体患者评估中作为机会性生物标志物发挥作用,并可整合到决策支持系统中.工作流与人工智能的集成对于自动化、定量身体成分评估,在多学科病例讨论中实现广泛的可用性。
    UNASSIGNED: Body composition assessment (BCA) parameters have recently been identified as relevant prognostic factors for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Herein, we aimed to investigate the role of BCA parameters for prognosis prediction in patients with HCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective multicenter study included a total of 754 treatment-naïve patients with HCC who underwent TACE at six tertiary care centers between 2010-2020. Fully automated artificial intelligence-based quantitative 3D volumetry of abdominal cavity tissue composition was performed to assess skeletal muscle volume (SM), total adipose tissue (TAT), intra- and intermuscular adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue, and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) on pre-intervention computed tomography scans. BCA parameters were normalized to the slice number of the abdominal cavity. We assessed the influence of BCA parameters on median overall survival and performed multivariate analysis including established estimates of survival.
    UNASSIGNED: Univariate survival analysis revealed that impaired median overall survival was predicted by low SM (p <0.001), high TAT volume (p = 0.013), and high SAT volume (p = 0.006). In multivariate survival analysis, SM remained an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.039), while TAT and SAT volumes no longer showed predictive ability. This predictive role of SM was confirmed in a subgroup analysis of patients with BCLC stage B.
    UNASSIGNED: SM is an independent prognostic factor for survival prediction. Thus, the integration of SM into novel scoring systems could potentially improve survival prediction and clinical decision-making. Fully automated approaches are needed to foster the implementation of this imaging biomarker into daily routine.
    UNASSIGNED: Body composition assessment parameters, especially skeletal muscle volume, have been identified as relevant prognostic factors for many diseases and treatments. In this study, skeletal muscle volume has been identified as an independent prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization. Therefore, skeletal muscle volume as a metaparameter could play a role as an opportunistic biomarker in holistic patient assessment and be integrated into decision support systems. Workflow integration with artificial intelligence is essential for automated, quantitative body composition assessment, enabling broad availability in multidisciplinary case discussions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:在中国,经皮微波/射频消融肝分区加门静脉栓塞术(PALPP)和经动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)加门静脉栓塞术(PVE)均已用于计划的肝切除术.然而,缺乏关于这两种技术对未来肝脏残留(FLR)不足的病例的有效性的比较研究。
    方法:患者分为PALPP组和TACE+PVE组。临床数据,包括FLR增长率,并发症,二次切除率,和总生存率,对两组患者进行回顾性对比分析。
    结果:2014年12月至2021年10月,共有29例患者接受了TACE+PVE(n=12)和PALPP(n=17)。在TACE+PVE组中,7例患者成功行两期肝切除术,而在PALPP组中,13例患者接受了该手术(两阶段切除率:58.3%vs.76.5%,P=0.42)。一期手术的术后并发症没有显着差异(11.8%vs.8.3%,P>0.05)和二期切除并发症(0%vs.46.2%,TACE+PVE和PALPP组之间的P=0.05)。然而,PALPP组表现出第二阶段切除术的FLR体积增长时间较短(18.5天vs.66天,P=0.001)和KGR(58.5毫升/周vs.7.7毫升/周,P=0.001)。
    结论:与TACE+PVE相比,PALPP导致FLR体积的更显着增加,并且两阶段切除术的发生率更高,而不会增加术后并发症。
    BACKGROUND: In China, both percutaneous microwave/radiofrequency ablation liver partition plus portal vein embolization (PALPP) and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus portal vein embolization (PVE) have been utilized in planned hepatectomy. However, there is a lack of comparative studies on the effectiveness of these two techniques for cases with insufficient future liver remnant (FLR).
    METHODS: Patients were categorized into either the PALPP group or the TACE + PVE group. Clinical data, including FLR growth rate, complications, secondary resection rate, and overall survival rate, were compared and analyzed for both groups retrospectively.
    RESULTS: Between December 2014 and October 2021, a total of 29 patients underwent TACE + PVE (n = 12) and PALPP (n = 17). In the TACE + PVE group, 7 patients successfully underwent two-stage hepatectomy, while in the PALPP group, 13 patients underwent the procedure (two-stage resection rate: 58.3% vs. 76.5%, P = 0.42). There were no significant differences in postoperative complications of one-stage procedures (11.8% vs. 8.3%, P > 0.05) and second-stage resection complication (0% vs. 46.2%, P = 0.05) between the TACE + PVE and PALPP groups. However, the PALPP group demonstrated a shorter time to FLR volume growth for second-stage resection (18.5 days vs. 66 days, P = 0.001) and KGR (58.5 ml/week vs. 7.7 ml/week, P = 0.001).
    CONCLUSIONS: Compared with TACE + PVE, PALPP results in a more significant increase in FLR volume and a higher rate of two-stage resection without increasing postoperative complications.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Chemoembolization with small drug-eluting microspheres is widely used in the treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of transarterial chemoembolization with doxorubicin-eluting 30-60-µm microspheres (DEB-TACE) in patients with Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage A and B HCC.
    METHODS: In this single-center study, 88 patients with HCC (BCLC A/B: 15.9%/84.1%) who underwent 137 DEB-TACE sessions between January 2015 and December 2020 were retrospectively assessed. Response to treatment was assessed 4-8 weeks after each DEB-TACE procedure according to mRECIST (Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) criteria. Progression-free survival (PFS), time to progression (TTP), overall survival (OS), and adverse events were recorded.
    RESULTS: In 88 patients (84.1% males; median age, 66.0 years; range, 22-83), the median follow-up was 17 months (range, 2-64). Eight patients (9.1%) had a complete response, 42 (47.8%) had partial regression, 10 (11.3%) had stable disease, and 28 (31.8%) had progressive disease. There was a statistically significant difference between serum alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels before and after DEB-TACE treatment (p < 0.001). The median OS was 17 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 10.3-23.7). Cox regression analyses found that preprocedural serum AFP level (400+ vs. < 400; p = 0.024), Child Pugh classification (B vs. A; p = 0.019), and number of DEB-TACE sessions (1 vs. > 1; p = 0.003) were independent risk factors affecting OS. The median PFS was 8 months (95% CI, 5.8-10.2) and TTP was 6 months (1-14 months).
    CONCLUSIONS: Chemoembolization with 30-60-µm microspheres is an effective and safe treatment for HCC. The number of DEB-TACE sessions is also one of the factors affecting OS.
    UNASSIGNED: HINTERGRUND: Die Chemoembolisation mit kleinen medikamentenfreisetzenden Mikrosphären ist weit verbreitet zur Therapie des hepatozellulären Karzinoms (HCC). ZIEL: Ziel der vorliegenden Studie war es, die Wirksamkeit und Sicherheit der transarteriellen Chemoembolisation mit Doxorubicin freisetzenden Mikrosphären von 30–60 µm Durchmesser (DEB-TACE) bei Patienten mit einem HCC im Stadium A und B gemäß Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) zu untersuchen.
    METHODS: In dieser Einzelzentrumstudie wurden 88 Patienten mit HCC (BCLC A: 15,9%/BCLC B: 84,1%) retrospektiv untersucht, bei denen 137 DEB-TACE-Sitzungen zwischen Januar 2015 und Dezember 2020 durchgeführt wurden. Die Reaktion auf die Behandlung wurde 4–8 Wochen nach jeder DEB-TACE-Sitzung gemäß mRECIST-Kriterien (Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) beurteilt. Das progressionsfreie Überleben (PFS), die Zeit bis zur Progression (TTP), Gesamtüberleben (OS) und unerwünschte Ereignisse wurden dokumentiert.
    UNASSIGNED: Für die 88 Patienten (84,1% männlich; Durchschnittsalter: 66,0 Jahre; Spannbreite: 22–83) betrug der mittlere Nachbeobachtungszeitraum 17 Monate (Spannbreite: 2–64). Bei 8 Patienten (9,1%) kam es zum vollständigen Therapieansprechen, bei 42 (47,8%) zur partiellen Regression, 10 (11,3%) wiesen eine stabile Erkrankung auf, und 28 (31,8%) eine progressive Erkrankung. Es bestand eine statistisch signifikante Differenz zwischen den Werten für alpha-Fetoprotein (AFP) im Serum vor und nach DEB-TACE-Therapie (p < 0,001). Das durchschnittliche OS betrug 17 Monate (95%-Konfidenzintervall, 95%-KI: 10,3–23,7). Die Cox-Regressionsanalyse ergab, dass der präprozedurale Serum-AFP-Wert (400+ vs. < 400; p = 0,024), die Child-Pugh-Klassifikation (B vs. A; p = 0,019) und die Anzahl der DEB-TACE-Sitzungen (1 vs. > 1; p = 0,003) unabhängige Riskofaktoren für das OS darstellten. Das mittlere PFS lag bei 8 Monaten (95%-KI: 5,8–10,2) und die TTP bei 6 Monaten (1–14 Monate).
    UNASSIGNED: Die Chemoembolisation mit Mikrosphären von 30–60 µm Durchmesser stellt eine wirksame und sichere Therapie des HCC dar. Dabei ist die Anzahl der DEB-TACE-Sitzungen auch einer der Faktoren mit Auswirkungen auf das OS.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Case Reports
    不可切除的乳腺癌肝转移(BCLM)患者预后不佳。尽管肝移植(LT)转移性肝肿瘤最近显示出良好的效果,BCLM代表绝对禁忌症。这项研究旨在探讨在经历终末期肝病的患者中,LT治疗BCLM后长期生存的潜力。在多种肿瘤治疗之后。在2019年7月,我们对一名41岁的女性进行了已故供体LT,该女性患有人表皮生长因子受体2靶向治疗控制的BCLM,在多次局部肝定向治疗后出现肝功能衰竭。原发肿瘤于2000年接受手术切除和辅助放化疗治疗。该程序是根据当地道德委员会批准的协议进行的,和意大利国家移植中心。在LT后立即用曲妥珠单抗进行12个月的治疗。在没有类固醇的情况下进行移植后的免疫抑制,还有依维莫司.患者完成12个月的随访,无复发。然后停用曲妥珠单抗。LT后15个月,出现肝复发,并接受化疗.2021年10月,她出现了2个脑部病变,并接受了立体定向放射治疗。病人还活着,2024年1月进行的正电子发射断层扫描/计算机断层扫描显示无疾病。该患者具有极端选择性的BCLM的LT显示出良好的临床结果。围手术期全身治疗和肿瘤控制是必要的。一个具体的协议应该在多学科团队中讨论,以及地方和国家当局。即使肿瘤复发,多模式疗法可以控制疾病。
    Patients with nonresectable breast cancer liver metastasis (BCLM) face a dismal prognosis. Despite liver transplantation (LT) for metastatic liver tumors having recently shown good results, BCLM represents an absolute contraindication. This study aimed to investigate the potential for long-term survival after LT for BCLMs in a patient experiencing end-stage liver disease, following multiple oncologic treatments. In July 2019, we performed a deceased donor LT on a 41-year-old female with BCLM controlled with human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 targeted therapy, who developed liver failure following multiple locoregional liver-directed treatments. The primary tumor was treated with surgical resection and adjuvant chemoradiation in 2000. The procedure was performed under a protocol approved by the local ethical committee, and by the Italian National Transplant Center. A 12-month treatment with trastuzumab was performed immediately after LT. Immunosuppression following transplantation was undertaken without steroids, and with everolimus. The patient completed 12 months of follow-up without recurrence. Trastuzumab was then withdrawn. Fifteen months after LT, a liver recurrence occurred that was treated with chemotherapy. In October 2021, she developed 2 brain lesions that were treated with stereotactic radiation. The patient is still alive, with a positron emission tomography/computed tomography performed in January 2024 showing no disease. LT for this patient with BCLM of extreme selectivity showed a good clinical outcome. Perioperative systemic treatment and tumor control are necessary. A specific protocol should be discussed within a multidisciplinary team, and with local and national authorities. Even if tumor recurrence occurs, multimodal therapy can control the disease.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:膈下癌已被确定为肝内肿瘤热消融的重要危险因素,导致较高的残留肿瘤复发率。一些研究表明,经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合射频消融治疗对于the下区域的肿瘤既可行又安全。然而,缺乏专门研究TACE和微波消融(TACE-MWA)联合治疗在膈下肿瘤中的治疗结果的研究.
    目的:评价TACE-MWA治疗膈下肝细胞癌的疗效和安全性。
    方法:在2017年12月至2021年12月之间,49例诊断为肝癌≤6厘米,谁收到了TACE-MWA,纳入这项回顾性队列研究。根据膈肌和肿瘤边缘之间的距离,将这些患者分为膈下组和非膈下组。局部肿瘤进展率(LTP),无进展生存期(PFS),比较两组总生存期(OS)。并发症是通过使用介入放射学学会开发的分级系统进行评估的。
    结果:经过38个月的中位随访时间,膈下组和非膈下组之间的LTP没有显着差异(5年时分别为27.3%和22.2%,分别为;P=0.66),PFS(两组5年时55.5%;P=0.91),和OS(在5年时,膈下和非膈下组分别为85.0%和90.9%;P=0.57)。然而,与≤3cm的HCC相比,在3cm以下的HCC中观察到LTP的发生率明显更高(P=0.085)。碘化油剂量[风险比(HR):1.52;95%置信区间(CI):1.11-2.08;P=0.009]和多个肿瘤(HR:13.22;95CI:1.62-107.51;P=0.016)是LTP的独立预后因素。两组并发症发生率差异无统计学意义(P=0.549)。
    结论:联合TACE和MWA用于治疗膈下HCC是可行且安全的。当治疗膈下区域以外的肿瘤时,疗效和安全性水平没有显著变化。
    BACKGROUND: Subphrenic carcinoma has been identified as a significant risk factor for the thermal ablation of intrahepatic tumors, resulting in a high rate of residual tumor recurrence. Some studies have proposed that combination treatment with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) followed by radiofrequency ablation is both feasible and safe for tumors in the subphrenic region. However, research specifically examining the therapeutic outcomes of combination therapy using TACE and microwave ablation (TACE-MWA) in subphrenic tumors is lacking.
    OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of TACE-MWA in patients with subphrenic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    METHODS: Between December 2017 and December 2021, 49 patients diagnosed with HCC ≤ 6 cm, who received TACE-MWA, were included in this retrospective cohort study. These patients were classified into subphrenic and non-subphrenic groups based on the distance between the diaphragm and the tumor margin. The rates of local tumor progression (LTP), progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were compared between the two groups. Complications were evaluated by using a grading system developed by the Society of Interventional Radiology.
    RESULTS: After a median follow-up time of 38 mo, there were no significant differences in LTP between the subphrenic and non-subphrenic groups (27.3% and 22.2% at 5 years, respectively; P = 0.66), PFS (55.5% at 5 years in both groups; P = 0.91), and OS (85.0% and 90.9% in the subphrenic and non-subphrenic groups at 5 years; P = 0.57). However, a significantly higher rate of LTP was observed in subphrenic HCC > 3 cm compared to those ≤ 3 cm (P = 0.085). The dosage of iodized oil [hazard ratio (HR): 1.52; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-2.08; P = 0.009] and multiple tumors (HR: 13.22; 95%CI: 1.62-107.51; P = 0.016) were independent prognostic factors for LTP. There were no significant differences in complication rates between the two groups (P = 0.549).
    CONCLUSIONS: Combined TACE and MWA was practical and safe for managing subphrenic HCC. The efficacy and safety levels did not vary significantly when tumors outside the subphrenic region were treated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:联合治疗已成为不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)的研究重点。近年来,多项研究探讨了经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)与酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)和免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)联合治疗的临床疗效和安全性.
    目的:进行更新的荟萃分析,验证三联疗法治疗不可切除的HCC的临床益处和不良反应。
    方法:所有符合条件的队列,非随机对照,和PubMed的随机对照试验研究,WebofScience,Embase,科克伦图书馆,和截至2024年3月20日的MedLine数据库进行了本荟萃分析筛选。研究终点包括完全缓解(CR),客观反应率(ORR),疾病控制率(DCR),总生存期(OS),无进展生存期(PFS),和不良事件(AE)。Stata16/18软件用于此荟萃分析,P值<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。
    结果:共纳入29项研究,共1754例患者。在接受TKIs和ICIs的TACE治疗的患者中,肿瘤反应结果显示合并的CR,ORR,和DCR为14%[95CI(0.11-0.18)],61%[95CI(0.55-0.66)],和85%[95CI(0.83-0.87)],分别。就生存结果而言,合并的中位PFS和OS分别为10.25个月[95CI(9.31-11.18)]和20.47个月[95CI(18.98-21.97)],分别。三联治疗期间所有级别AE的合并患病率为90%[95CI(0.84-0.94)],≥3级AE的合并患病率为32%[95CI(0.24-0.42)]。
    结论:TACE联合治疗,TKIs,在肿瘤反应和生存结果方面,ICI和ICI对不可切除的HCC具有巨大的临床益处,而不会增加严重AE的风险。
    BACKGROUND: Combination therapy has emerged as the focus of research for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). In recent years, several studies have explored the clinical efficacy and safety of the combination therapies of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs).
    OBJECTIVE: To conduct an updated meta-analysis verifying the clinical benefits and adverse effects of the triple combination therapy for unresectable HCC.
    METHODS: All eligible cohort, non-randomized controlled, and randomized controlled trial studies from the PubMed, Web of Science, Embase, Cochrane Library, and MedLine databases up to March 20, 2024 were screened for the present meta-analysis. The study endpoints included complete response (CR), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS), and adverse events (AEs). Stata 16/18 software was used for this meta-analysis, and a P value of <0.05 was considered statistically significant.
    RESULTS: A total of 29 studies with 1754 patients were included. Among the patients who received the TACE therapy with TKIs and ICIs, the tumor response results revealed a pooled CR, ORR, and DCR of 14% [95%CI (0.11-0.18)], 61% [95%CI (0.55-0.66)], and 85% [95%CI (0.83-0.87)], respectively. In terms of the survival outcomes, the pooled median PFS and OS were 10.25 months [95%CI (9.31-11.18)] and 20.47 months [95%CI (18.98-21.97)], respectively. The pooled prevalence of all-grade AEs during the triple treatment was 90% [95%CI (0.84-0.94)] and that of grade ≥ 3 AEs was 32% [95%CI (0.24-0.42)].
    CONCLUSIONS: The combination therapy of TACE, TKIs, and ICIs exhibits great clinical benefits for unresectable HCC in terms of tumor responses and survival outcomes without increasing the risk of severe AEs.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    最近,在晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者中,lenvatinib治疗证明了相对剂量强度(RDI)与疗效之间的关系,乐伐替尼单药治疗的RDI较高,表明疗效较高。然而,并非每个患者在治疗过程中都能耐受高RDI;因此,需要低RDI的患者可能需要附加联合治疗。经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)联合乐伐替尼治疗可改善临床预后。因此,本研究的目的是比较Lenvatinib联合TACE(LEN-TACE组)与Lenvatinib单药(LEN组)在RDI高或低的不可切除HCC患者中的临床结局.本回顾性研究共纳入66例晚期HCC患者。符合条件的患者是在2018年4月至2020年9月期间开始lenvatinib单药治疗的患者。在这些病人中,29人的8周RDI≥60%,其中6人收到LEN-TACE。另有37例患者的8周RDI<60%,其中7人收到LEN-TACE。在高RDI组中,低RDI组的放射学评价和总生存期(OS)时间均得到改善.此外,在低RDI组中,LEN-TACE治疗的患者的中位OS长于lenvatinib单药治疗的患者(P=0.0467).因此,本研究的结果表明,对于接受剂量不足的Lenvatinib的患者,应考虑早期TACE,而不是继续仅接受Lenvatinib治疗,例如8周RDI<60%的那些。
    Recently, the relationship between the relative dose intensity (RDI) and efficacy was demonstrated for lenvatinib therapy in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), with a higher RDI of lenvatinib monotherapy indicating a higher efficacy. However, not every patient can tolerate a high RDI during the course of treatment; therefore, add-on combination therapy may be necessary for patients requiring a low RDI. The addition of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) to lenvatinib therapy improves clinical outcomes. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to compare the clinical outcomes of lenvatinib plus TACE (the LEN-TACE group) with those of lenvatinib alone (the LEN group) in patients with unresectable HCC with a high- or low-RDI. A total of 66 patients with advanced HCC were enrolled in the present retrospective study. Eligible patients were those who initiated lenvatinib monotherapy between April 2018 and September 2020. Of these patients, 29 had an 8-week RDI of ≥60%, 6 of which received LEN-TACE. A further 37 patients had an 8-week RDI of <60%, 7 of which received LEN-TACE. In the high-RDI group, both the radiological evaluations and the overall survival (OS) time were improved in those in the low-RDI group. In addition, the median OS of patients treated with LEN-TACE was longer compared with that of patients treated with lenvatinib alone in the low-RDI group (P=0.0467). Therefore, the results of the present study revealed that early TACE should be considered instead of continuing lenvatinib only treatment in patients receiving an insufficient dose of lenvatinib, such as those with an 8-week RDI of <60%.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:尽管常规肝动脉化疗栓塞(cTACE)可以进行无限制疗程的肝转移,没有数据表明治疗何时无效.这项研究旨在确定在肝转移患者中放弃cTACE之前,无反应患者重复cTACE的最佳次数。
    方法:在本回顾性研究中,单一机构分析,神经内分泌肿瘤(NET)肝转移患者,结直肠癌(CRC),研究了2001年至2015年连续接受cTACE治疗的肺癌。定量欧洲肝脏研究协会(qEASL)标准用于反应评估。cTACE的数量和2年之间的关联,5年,评估总生存期,以估计每个生存结局的最佳cTACE次数.
    结果:85例患者共进行了186次cTACE治疗117例肝转移,其中30.7%对第一次cTACE有反应。对于第一个没有反应的目标病变,第二,和第三次cTACE会议,第二次之后的反应率,第三,第四次cTACE会议为33.3%,23%,25%,分别。第四次cTACE会议是2年生存的最佳数量(HR0.40;95CI:0.16-0.97;p=0.04),5年生存率(HR0.31;95CI:0.11-0.87;p=0.02),和总生存期(HR0.35;95CI:0.13-0.89;p=0.02)。
    结论:重复cTACE治疗NET引起的肝转移,CRC,肺癌与患者生存率改善相关。我们建议至少进行四次cTACE治疗,然后再对无反应的转移性肝脏病变进行另一种治疗。
    OBJECTIVE: Although unlimited sessions of conventional transarterial chemoembolization (cTACE) may be performed for liver metastases, there is no data indicating when treatment becomes ineffective. This study aimed to determine the optimal number of repeat cTACE sessions for nonresponding patients before abandoning cTACE in patients with liver metastases.
    METHODS: In this retrospective, single-institutional analysis, patients with liver metastases from neuroendocrine tumors (NET), colorectal carcinoma (CRC), and lung cancer who underwent consecutive cTACE sessions from 2001 to 2015 were studied. Quantitative European Association for Study of the Liver (qEASL) criteria were utilized for response assessment. The association between the number of cTACE and 2-year, 5-year, and overall survival was evaluated to estimate the optimal number of cTACE for each survival outcome.
    RESULTS: Eighty-five patients underwent a total of 186 cTACE sessions for 117 liver metastases, of which 30.7 % responded to the first cTACE. For the target lesions that did not respond to the first, second, and third cTACE sessions, response rates after the second, third, and fourth cTACE sessions were 33.3 %, 23 %, and 25 %, respectively. The fourth cTACE session was the optimal number for 2-year survival (HR 0.40; 95 %CI: 0.16-0.97; p = 0.04), 5-year survival (HR 0.31; 95 %CI: 0.11-0.87; p = 0.02), and overall survival (HR 0.35; 95 %CI: 0.13-0.89; p = 0.02).
    CONCLUSIONS: Repeat cTACE in the management of liver metastases from NET, CRC, and lung cancer was associated with improved patient survival. We recommend at least four cTACE sessions before switching to another treatment for nonresponding metastatic liver lesions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝切除术后的高复发率强调了对肝细胞癌(HCC)新辅助治疗的迫切需要,以提高患者的整体预后。免疫检查点抑制剂,卡姆瑞珠单抗联合抗血管生成酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)阿帕替尼,已成为不可切除HCC患者的一线治疗选择,但其新辅助联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)在HCC中的应用仍有待探索.因此,本研究旨在探讨序贯TACE的有效性和安全性,camrelizumab,和阿帕替尼作为单一的新辅助疗法,巨大的HCC。
    方法:这种多中心,开放标签随机3期试验将在7家三级医院进行.单个巨大(直径≥10cm)的患者,可切除的HCC将以1:1的比例随机分配到单独的手术臂或新辅助治疗后的手术臂。在新辅助治疗组中,患者将在随机化后1周内接受TACE,其次是卡利珠单抗(200毫克q2w,4个周期),连同阿帕替尼(250mgqd,2个月)。除非疾病被评估为进行性,否则患者将在新辅助治疗后接受肝切除术。主要结果是1年无复发生存期(RFS)。将计算60名患者的计划样本量,以允许在1年内积累足够的RFS事件,以实现RFS主要终点的80%功效。
    结论:局部治疗的多模式治疗提供的协同作用,TKI,抗程序性细胞死亡1抑制剂可显着改善不可切除HCC患者的总体生存率。我们的试验将研究TACE三联的疗效和安全性,camrelizumab,阿帕替尼作为一种新辅助治疗策略,可切除的HCC。
    背景:www.chitr.org.cnChiCTR2300078086。2023年11月28日注册。开始招聘:2024年1月1日。预计完成招聘:2025年6月15日。
    BACKGROUND: The high recurrence rate after liver resection emphasizes the urgent need for neoadjuvant therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to enhance the overall prognosis for patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, camrelizumab combined with an anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) apatinib, have emerged as a first-line treatment option for patients with unresectable HCC, yet its neoadjuvant application in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in HCC remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of sequential TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib as a neoadjuvant therapy for single, huge HCC.
    METHODS: This multi-center, open-label randomized phase 3 trial will be conducted at 7 tertiary hospitals. Patients with single huge (≥ 10 cm in diameter), resectable HCC will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to arm of surgery alone or arm of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. In the neoadjuvant therapy group, patients will receive TACE within 1 week after randomization, followed by camrelizumab (200 mg q2w, 4 cycles), along with apatinib (250 mg qd, 2 months). Patients will receive liver resection after neoadjuvant therapy unless the disease is assessed as progressive. The primary outcome is recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 1 year. The planned sample size of 60 patients will be calculated to permit the accumulation of sufficient RFS events in 1 year to achieve 80% power for the RFS primary endpoint.
    CONCLUSIONS: Synergistic effects provided by multimodality therapy of locoregional treatment, TKI, and anti-programmed cell death 1 inhibitor significantly improved overall survival for patients with unresectable HCC. Our trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of the triple combination of TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib as a neoadjuvant strategy for huge, resectable HCC.
    BACKGROUND: www.chitr.org.cn ChiCTR2300078086. Registered on November 28, 2023. Start recruitment: 1st January 2024. Expected completion of recruitment: 15th June 2025.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管阿妥珠单抗联合贝伐单抗(A+B)有望治疗不可切除的肝细胞癌(uHCC),反应率仍然不理想。我们先前的研究强调了经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)与基于FOLFOX的肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)在HCC治疗中的潜力。本研究旨在评估A+B加TACE-HAIC治疗高肿瘤负荷uHCC(HTB-uHCC)的安全性和有效性。
    方法:这项三中心回顾性研究涉及82例接受TACE-HAIC治疗的HTB-uHCC患者我们将HTB-uHCC患者描述为超过11个标准的患者,表现为VP3-4,或表现为肝外转移。主要结果是客观缓解率(ORR)和无进展生存期(PFS)。次要结果包括治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)和总生存期(OS)的发生率。
    结果:采用mRECIST标准,ORR为62.2%,其中18例(22.0%)患者达到完全缓解,33(40.2%)显示部分反应,21人(25.6%)维持病情稳定,和10(12.2%)显示疾病进展。令人印象深刻的是,11例(13.4%)患者转换为可切除的HCC并进行了根治性肝切除术。中位PFS为10.1个月(95%CI,8.4至NA),中位OS仍在等待中。在一年的时间里,OS和PFS率分别为92.8%(95%CI,86.1至100.0)和42.9%(95%CI,31.3至58.7),分别。79(96.3%)经历了TRAE,39人(47.6%)有3-4级TRAE,尽管没有治疗相关的死亡记录。
    结论:研究结果强调了A+B和TACE-HAIC联合治疗对HTB-uHCC患者的潜力,将其标记为可行的治疗选择,鉴于其有效的疗效和可耐受的安全性。
    BACKGROUND: Though atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) offer promise for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treatment, the response rate remains suboptimal. Our previous studies highlighted the potential of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) when combined with FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in HCC treatment. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A+B plus TACE-HAIC for high tumor burden uHCC (HTB-uHCC).
    METHODS: This three-center retrospective study involved 82 HTB-uHCC patients administered with TACE-HAIC followed by A+B. We characterized HTB-uHCC patients as those surpassing the up-to-11 criteria, exhibiting VP 3-4, or presenting extrahepatic metastases. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes encompassed the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and overall survival (OS).
    RESULTS: Employing the mRECIST criteria, the ORR was 62.2 %, wherein 18 (22.0 %) patients achieved complete response, 33 (40.2 %) demonstrated partial response, 21 (25.6 %) maintained stable disease, and 10 (12.2 %) exhibited disease progression. Impressively, 11 (13.4 %) patients were converted to resectable HCC and underwent curative hepatectomy. The median PFS was 10.1 months (95 % CI, 8.4 to NA), and the median OS was still pending. At the one-year mark, the OS and PFS rates were 92.8 % (95 % CI, 86.1 to 100.0) and 42.9 % (95 % CI, 31.3 to 58.7), respectively. 79 (96.3 %) experienced TRAEs, and 39 (47.6 %) had grade 3-4 TRAEs, though no treatment-related death was recorded.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings underscore the potential of the A+B and TACE-HAIC combined treatment for HTB-uHCC patients, marking it as a viable therapeutic option, given its potent efficacy and tolerable safety profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号