Transarterial chemoembolization

经动脉化疗栓塞
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    身体成分评估(BCA)参数最近已被确定为肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的相关预后因素。在这里,我们的目的是探讨BCA参数在肝癌患者行经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)预后预测中的作用。
    这项回顾性多中心研究包括2010-2020年期间在六个三级护理中心接受TACE的总共754名未经治疗的HCC患者。进行了基于全自动人工智能的腹腔组织组成的定量3D体积测量,以评估骨骼肌体积(SM)。总脂肪组织(TAT),肌内和肌间脂肪组织,内脏脂肪组织,和介入前计算机断层扫描的皮下脂肪组织(SAT)。将BCA参数标准化为腹腔的切片数。我们评估了BCA参数对中位总生存期的影响,并进行了多变量分析,包括确定的生存期估计值。
    单变量生存分析显示,低SM(p<0.001)预测了受损的中位总生存期,高TAT体积(p=0.013),和高SAT容量(p=0.006)。在多变量生存分析中,SM仍然是一个独立的预后因素(p=0.039),而TAT和SAT卷不再显示预测能力。在BCLCB期患者的亚组分析中证实了SM的这种预测作用。
    SM是生存预测的独立预后因素。因此,将SM整合到新型评分系统中可能会改善生存预测和临床决策.需要完全自动化的方法来促进这种成像生物标志物在日常生活中的实施。
    身体成分评估参数,尤其是骨骼肌体积,已被确定为许多疾病和治疗的相关预后因素。在这项研究中,骨骼肌体积已被确定为肝细胞癌患者经肝动脉化疗栓塞的独立预后因素。因此,作为元参数的骨骼肌体积可在整体患者评估中作为机会性生物标志物发挥作用,并可整合到决策支持系统中.工作流与人工智能的集成对于自动化、定量身体成分评估,在多学科病例讨论中实现广泛的可用性。
    UNASSIGNED: Body composition assessment (BCA) parameters have recently been identified as relevant prognostic factors for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Herein, we aimed to investigate the role of BCA parameters for prognosis prediction in patients with HCC undergoing transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
    UNASSIGNED: This retrospective multicenter study included a total of 754 treatment-naïve patients with HCC who underwent TACE at six tertiary care centers between 2010-2020. Fully automated artificial intelligence-based quantitative 3D volumetry of abdominal cavity tissue composition was performed to assess skeletal muscle volume (SM), total adipose tissue (TAT), intra- and intermuscular adipose tissue, visceral adipose tissue, and subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT) on pre-intervention computed tomography scans. BCA parameters were normalized to the slice number of the abdominal cavity. We assessed the influence of BCA parameters on median overall survival and performed multivariate analysis including established estimates of survival.
    UNASSIGNED: Univariate survival analysis revealed that impaired median overall survival was predicted by low SM (p <0.001), high TAT volume (p = 0.013), and high SAT volume (p = 0.006). In multivariate survival analysis, SM remained an independent prognostic factor (p = 0.039), while TAT and SAT volumes no longer showed predictive ability. This predictive role of SM was confirmed in a subgroup analysis of patients with BCLC stage B.
    UNASSIGNED: SM is an independent prognostic factor for survival prediction. Thus, the integration of SM into novel scoring systems could potentially improve survival prediction and clinical decision-making. Fully automated approaches are needed to foster the implementation of this imaging biomarker into daily routine.
    UNASSIGNED: Body composition assessment parameters, especially skeletal muscle volume, have been identified as relevant prognostic factors for many diseases and treatments. In this study, skeletal muscle volume has been identified as an independent prognostic factor for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma undergoing transarterial chemoembolization. Therefore, skeletal muscle volume as a metaparameter could play a role as an opportunistic biomarker in holistic patient assessment and be integrated into decision support systems. Workflow integration with artificial intelligence is essential for automated, quantitative body composition assessment, enabling broad availability in multidisciplinary case discussions.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:肝切除术后的高复发率强调了对肝细胞癌(HCC)新辅助治疗的迫切需要,以提高患者的整体预后。免疫检查点抑制剂,卡姆瑞珠单抗联合抗血管生成酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)阿帕替尼,已成为不可切除HCC患者的一线治疗选择,但其新辅助联合肝动脉化疗栓塞术(TACE)在HCC中的应用仍有待探索.因此,本研究旨在探讨序贯TACE的有效性和安全性,camrelizumab,和阿帕替尼作为单一的新辅助疗法,巨大的HCC。
    方法:这种多中心,开放标签随机3期试验将在7家三级医院进行.单个巨大(直径≥10cm)的患者,可切除的HCC将以1:1的比例随机分配到单独的手术臂或新辅助治疗后的手术臂。在新辅助治疗组中,患者将在随机化后1周内接受TACE,其次是卡利珠单抗(200毫克q2w,4个周期),连同阿帕替尼(250mgqd,2个月)。除非疾病被评估为进行性,否则患者将在新辅助治疗后接受肝切除术。主要结果是1年无复发生存期(RFS)。将计算60名患者的计划样本量,以允许在1年内积累足够的RFS事件,以实现RFS主要终点的80%功效。
    结论:局部治疗的多模式治疗提供的协同作用,TKI,抗程序性细胞死亡1抑制剂可显着改善不可切除HCC患者的总体生存率。我们的试验将研究TACE三联的疗效和安全性,camrelizumab,阿帕替尼作为一种新辅助治疗策略,可切除的HCC。
    背景:www.chitr.org.cnChiCTR2300078086。2023年11月28日注册。开始招聘:2024年1月1日。预计完成招聘:2025年6月15日。
    BACKGROUND: The high recurrence rate after liver resection emphasizes the urgent need for neoadjuvant therapy in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) to enhance the overall prognosis for patients. Immune checkpoint inhibitors, camrelizumab combined with an anti-angiogenic tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) apatinib, have emerged as a first-line treatment option for patients with unresectable HCC, yet its neoadjuvant application in combination with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in HCC remains unexplored. Therefore, this study aims to investigate the efficacy and safety of sequential TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib as a neoadjuvant therapy for single, huge HCC.
    METHODS: This multi-center, open-label randomized phase 3 trial will be conducted at 7 tertiary hospitals. Patients with single huge (≥ 10 cm in diameter), resectable HCC will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to arm of surgery alone or arm of neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. In the neoadjuvant therapy group, patients will receive TACE within 1 week after randomization, followed by camrelizumab (200 mg q2w, 4 cycles), along with apatinib (250 mg qd, 2 months). Patients will receive liver resection after neoadjuvant therapy unless the disease is assessed as progressive. The primary outcome is recurrence-free survival (RFS) at 1 year. The planned sample size of 60 patients will be calculated to permit the accumulation of sufficient RFS events in 1 year to achieve 80% power for the RFS primary endpoint.
    CONCLUSIONS: Synergistic effects provided by multimodality therapy of locoregional treatment, TKI, and anti-programmed cell death 1 inhibitor significantly improved overall survival for patients with unresectable HCC. Our trial will investigate the efficacy and safety of the triple combination of TACE, camrelizumab, and apatinib as a neoadjuvant strategy for huge, resectable HCC.
    BACKGROUND: www.chitr.org.cn ChiCTR2300078086. Registered on November 28, 2023. Start recruitment: 1st January 2024. Expected completion of recruitment: 15th June 2025.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    背景:尽管阿妥珠单抗联合贝伐单抗(A+B)有望治疗不可切除的肝细胞癌(uHCC),反应率仍然不理想。我们先前的研究强调了经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)与基于FOLFOX的肝动脉灌注化疗(HAIC)在HCC治疗中的潜力。本研究旨在评估A+B加TACE-HAIC治疗高肿瘤负荷uHCC(HTB-uHCC)的安全性和有效性。
    方法:这项三中心回顾性研究涉及82例接受TACE-HAIC治疗的HTB-uHCC患者我们将HTB-uHCC患者描述为超过11个标准的患者,表现为VP3-4,或表现为肝外转移。主要结果是客观缓解率(ORR)和无进展生存期(PFS)。次要结果包括治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)和总生存期(OS)的发生率。
    结果:采用mRECIST标准,ORR为62.2%,其中18例(22.0%)患者达到完全缓解,33(40.2%)显示部分反应,21人(25.6%)维持病情稳定,和10(12.2%)显示疾病进展。令人印象深刻的是,11例(13.4%)患者转换为可切除的HCC并进行了根治性肝切除术。中位PFS为10.1个月(95%CI,8.4至NA),中位OS仍在等待中。在一年的时间里,OS和PFS率分别为92.8%(95%CI,86.1至100.0)和42.9%(95%CI,31.3至58.7),分别。79(96.3%)经历了TRAE,39人(47.6%)有3-4级TRAE,尽管没有治疗相关的死亡记录。
    结论:研究结果强调了A+B和TACE-HAIC联合治疗对HTB-uHCC患者的潜力,将其标记为可行的治疗选择,鉴于其有效的疗效和可耐受的安全性。
    BACKGROUND: Though atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A+B) offer promise for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) treatment, the response rate remains suboptimal. Our previous studies highlighted the potential of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) when combined with FOLFOX-based hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy (HAIC) in HCC treatment. This study aims to evaluate the safety and efficacy of A+B plus TACE-HAIC for high tumor burden uHCC (HTB-uHCC).
    METHODS: This three-center retrospective study involved 82 HTB-uHCC patients administered with TACE-HAIC followed by A+B. We characterized HTB-uHCC patients as those surpassing the up-to-11 criteria, exhibiting VP 3-4, or presenting extrahepatic metastases. The primary outcomes were the objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes encompassed the incidence of treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and overall survival (OS).
    RESULTS: Employing the mRECIST criteria, the ORR was 62.2 %, wherein 18 (22.0 %) patients achieved complete response, 33 (40.2 %) demonstrated partial response, 21 (25.6 %) maintained stable disease, and 10 (12.2 %) exhibited disease progression. Impressively, 11 (13.4 %) patients were converted to resectable HCC and underwent curative hepatectomy. The median PFS was 10.1 months (95 % CI, 8.4 to NA), and the median OS was still pending. At the one-year mark, the OS and PFS rates were 92.8 % (95 % CI, 86.1 to 100.0) and 42.9 % (95 % CI, 31.3 to 58.7), respectively. 79 (96.3 %) experienced TRAEs, and 39 (47.6 %) had grade 3-4 TRAEs, though no treatment-related death was recorded.
    CONCLUSIONS: The findings underscore the potential of the A+B and TACE-HAIC combined treatment for HTB-uHCC patients, marking it as a viable therapeutic option, given its potent efficacy and tolerable safety profile.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    观察和评估多纳非尼联合经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)的疗效和安全性。
    这个前景,单臂,单中心,II期临床研究纳入了36例初次无法切除的HCC患者,这些患者未接受任何系统治疗.患者接受多纳非尼加TACE(n=26)或多纳非尼加TACE加程序性死亡受体1抑制剂(n=10)。主要终点是短期疗效,次要终点包括无进展生存期(PFS),响应时间(TTR)疾病控制率(DCR),和不良事件。还测量了肿瘤供血动脉直径。
    对所有36例患者的疗效评估显示6例完全缓解,19的部分反应,8稳定的疾病,和3进行性疾病。6名(16.7%)患者成功接受了转换手术,全部实现R0切除,2例(5.6%)达到完全病理反应。客观有效率(ORR)为69.4%,DCR为91.7%。中位PFS为10.7个月,未达到中位总生存期,TTR中位数为1.4个月.6、12和18个月的中位生存率为85.0%,77.6%,和71.3%,分别。6、12和18个月的中位PFS率为65.3%,45.6%,和34.2%,分别。治疗相关不良事件(TRAEs)发生在所有25名受试者中,包括4个(11.3%)3级TRAE。没有发生4级或5级TRAE。治疗后肿瘤供血动脉直径明显下降(P=0.036)。多变量分析显示基线目标病变直径的总和,最佳肿瘤反应,联合免疫疗法是PFS的独立预测因子。
    TACE加多纳非尼可降低不可切除HCC患者的肿瘤供血动脉直径。安全性很好,实现了较高的ORR。
    UNASSIGNED: To observe and assess the efficacy and safety of donafenib combined with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) to treat unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    UNASSIGNED: This prospective, single-arm, single-center, phase II clinical study enrolled 36 patients with initial unresectable HCC who had not undergone any systemic treatment. The patients received donafenib plus TACE (n = 26) or donafenib plus TACE plus programmed death receptor 1 inhibitors (n = 10). The primary endpoint was short-term efficacy, with secondary endpoints including progression-free survival (PFS), time to response (TTR), disease control rate (DCR), and adverse events. The tumor feeding artery diameter was also measured.
    UNASSIGNED: Efficacy evaluation of all 36 patients revealed 6 cases of complete response, 19 of partial response, 8 of stable disease, and 3 of progressive disease. Six (16.7%) patients successfully underwent conversion surgery, all achieving R0 resection, and 2 (5.6%) achieved a complete pathological response. The objective response rate (ORR) was 69.4% and the DCR was 91.7%. The median PFS was 10.7 months, the median overall survival was not reached, and the median TTR was 1.4 months. The median survival rates at 6, 12, and 18 months were 85.0%, 77.6%, and 71.3%, respectively. The median PFS rates at 6, 12, and 18 months were 65.3%, 45.6%, and 34.2%, respectively. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in all 25 subjects, including 4 (11.3%) grade 3 TRAEs. No grade 4 or 5 TRAEs occurred. The tumor feeding artery diameter was significantly decreased following treatment (P = 0.036). Multivariable analysis revealed the sum of baseline target lesion diameters, best tumor response, and combined immunotherapy as independent predictors of PFS.
    UNASSIGNED: TACE plus donafenib reduced the tumor feeding artery diameter in patients with unresectable HCC. The safety profile was good, and a high ORR was achieved.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:肝细胞癌(HCC)局部治疗反应通常使用改良的实体肿瘤反应评估标准和美国放射学会(ACR)肝脏报告和数据系统(LI-RADS)评估MRI/CT的治疗反应评估(TRA)。这项研究旨在评估新型ACR对比增强超声(CEUS)非放射TRALI-RADSv2024在经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗的HCC中的诊断性能。
    方法:这项回顾性观察性研究纳入了先前报道的队列中87例接受TACE治疗的患者。治疗后15天和30天,评估了68和72个HCC病变。具有不同CEUS经验水平的三名失明放射科医生独立解释了图像。根据CEUS非放射TRALI-RADSv2024,评估了病灶内和病灶周围肿瘤的生存力,最终的TRA类别如下:TR-不可活,TR-等效,和TR-可行。使用的参考标准是组织学和成像的复合。
    结果:分析了140个HCC病灶。治疗后15天,灵敏度(SN),特异性(SP),阳性预测值(PPV),负预测值(NPV),TR-Viable分类的准确率为72.5-94.3%,72.2-86.4%,86.8-91.4%,65.6-86.7%,76.9-86.8%,分别。治疗后30天,SN,PPV,TR-可行分类的净现值下降,65.9-84.2%,85.7-90.6%,59.5-73.9%,分别,当SP增加时,范围为80.0-88.0%。Kappa值范围为0.557-0.730,表明中等到实质一致。
    结论:CEUS非放射TRALI-RADS是检测经TACE治疗的病变中可行肿瘤的可靠工具,并且在读者中具有可重复性。
    OBJECTIVE: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) locoregional treatment response is commonly evaluated using the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors and the American College of Radiology (ACR) Liver Reporting and Data System (LI-RADS) Treatment Response Assessment (TRA) for MRI/CT. This study aims to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the new ACR contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) Nonradiation TRA LI-RADS v2024 in HCC treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE).
    METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 87 patients treated with TACE from a previously reported cohort. At 15- and 30-days post-treatment, 68 and 72 HCC lesions were evaluated. Three blinded radiologists with different levels of CEUS experience interpreted the images independently. According to CEUS Nonradiation TRA LI-RADSv2024, both intralesional and perilesional tumor viability were evaluated and final TRA categories were as follows: TR-Nonviable, TR-Equivocal, and TR-Viable. The reference standard used was a composite of histology and imaging.
    RESULTS: 140 HCC lesions were analyzed. At 15 days post-treatment, the sensitivity (SN), specificity (SP), positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), and accuracy of TR-Viable classification ranged from 72.5-94.3%, 72.2-86.4%, 86.8-91.4%, 65.6-86.7%, 76.9-86.8%, respectively. At 30 days post-treatment, the SN, PPV, and NPV of TR-Viable classification decreased, ranging from 65.9-84.2%, 85.7-90.6%, and 59.5-73.9%, respectively, while the SP increased, ranging from 80.0-88.0%. Kappa values ranged from 0.557-0.730, indicating moderate to substantial agreement.
    CONCLUSIONS: CEUS Nonradiation TRA LI-RADS is a reliable tool for the detection of viable tumors in lesions treated with TACE and demonstrates reproducibility across readers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的目的是探讨程序性死亡受体-1(PD-1)抑制剂是否会改善经肝动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)加lenvatinib治疗的不可切除肝细胞癌(HCC)的预后。在这项单中心回顾性研究中,本研究纳入了接受TACE治疗并接受lenvatinib联合或不联合PD-1抑制剂治疗的不可切除HCC患者,并将患者分为TACE+lenvatinib组和TACE+lenvatinib+PD-1组.总生存期(OS),通过实体瘤的反应评估标准(RECISTv1.1和mRECIST)评估无进展生存期(PFS)和肿瘤反应。根据不良事件通用术语标准(CTCAE,版本5.0)。总的来说,35个合格的患者与不可切除的HCC包括;82.9%的患者有乙型肝炎病毒(HBV)感染,88.6%的患者患有肝硬化。共有88.6%的患者有多发肿瘤,最大肿瘤的中位直径为10.1cm。共有14.3%的患者发生肝外转移,51.4%的患者有门静脉癌栓。BCLC阶段A的百分比,B和C为5.7%,28.6%和65.7%,分别。TACE+乐伐替尼组16例,TACE+乐伐替尼+PD-1组19例。中位随访时间为7.7个月(1.7至31.6个月)。两组均未达到中位总生存期。根据RECISTv1.1标准,TACE+lenvatinib和TACE+lenvatinib+PD-1组的中位PFS分别为10.4和7.9个月(HR,1.13;95%CI0.45-2.84;p=0.80),客观有效率(ORR)分别为31.3%和31.6%(p>0.05),疾病控制率(DCR)分别为93.8%和78.9%(p>0.05),分别。根据mRECIST标准,中位PFS为10.4和10.1个月(HR,0.98;95%CI0.38-2.54,p=0.97),ORR为62.5%和63.2%(p>0.05),DCR分别为93.8%和73.7%(p>0.05),分别。总的来说,两组之间的AE相对相似。PD-1抑制剂不能改善TACE联合乐伐替尼治疗的不可切除HCC的PFS和肿瘤反应。乙型肝炎感染,肝硬化,门静脉肿瘤血栓,多肿瘤和大肿瘤直径可能是影响PD-1抑制剂疗效的潜在因素,但需要进一步验证.
    Our aim was to explore whether programmed death receptor-1 (PD-1) inhibitors would improve the prognosis of unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) treated with transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) plus lenvatinib. In this single-center retrospective study, patients with unresectable HCC who underwent TACE and were administered lenvatinib with or without PD-1 inhibitors were enrolled and divided into the TACE + lenvatinib group and TACE + lenvatinib + PD-1 group. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and tumor response were assessed by the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.1 and mRECIST). Treatment-related adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE, version 5.0). In total, 35 eligible patients with unresectable HCC were included; 82.9% of patients had Hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, and 88.6% of patients had liver cirrhosis. A total of 88.6% of patients had multiple tumors, and the median diameter of the largest tumor was 10.1 cm. A total of 14.3% of patients had extrahepatic metastasis, and 51.4% of patients had portal vein tumor thrombus. The percentages of BCLC stages A, B and C were 5.7%, 28.6% and 65.7%, respectively. There were 16 patients in the TACE + lenvatinib group and 19 patients in the TACE + lenvatinib + PD-1 group. The median follow-up time was 7.7 months (ranging from 1.7 to 31.6 months). Neither group reached the median overall survival. Under RECIST v1.1 criteria, the median PFS was 10.4 and 7.9 months in the TACE + lenvatinib and TACE + lenvatinib + PD-1 groups (HR, 1.13; 95% CI 0.45-2.84; p = 0.80), the objective response rates (ORR) were 31.3% and 31.6% (p > 0.05), and the disease control rates (DCR) were 93.8% and 78.9% (p > 0.05), respectively. Under mRECIST criteria, the median PFS was 10.4 and 10.1 months (HR, 0.98; 95% CI 0.38-2.54, p = 0.97), the ORR was 62.5% and 63.2% (p > 0.05), and the DCR was 93.8% and 73.7% (p > 0.05), respectively. Overall, AEs were relatively similar between the two groups. PD-1 inhibitors did not improve the PFS and tumor response of unresectable HCC treated with TACE plus lenvatinib. Hepatitis B infection, liver cirrhosis, portal vein tumor thrombus, multiple tumors and large tumor diameter may be potential factors that affect the efficacy of PD-1 inhibitors but need further validation.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)与全身治疗相结合对中期肝细胞癌(HCC)患者具有显着疗效。本研究旨在验证TACE联合阿特珠单抗和贝伐单抗(TACE+Atez/Bev)与单独TACE相比的疗效。
    在中国的三个中心进行了一项回顾性研究,涵盖155例肝癌中期患者。倾向得分匹配(PSM)用于最小化选择偏差,比例为1:1。主要结果是TACE特异性无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS)。根据改良的实体瘤反应评估标准(mRECIST)评估客观反应率(ORR)和疾病控制率(DCR)。分析与治疗相关的不良事件(AE),评价其安全性。
    PSM之前,TACE+Atez/Bev组表现出延长的中位OS(未达到20.3个月,P=0.004)和PFS(20.0个月vs9.8个月,P=0.029)与TACE单独组相比。TACE+Atez/Bev组的ORR也较高(60.9%对41.3%,P=0.026)和DCR(89.1%对58.7%,P<0.001)比TACE单独组。应用PSM后,该研究包括42对患者。与单独使用TACE组相比,联合治疗组也显示出显著更长的中位OS(未达到vs21.4个月,P=0.008)和PFS(21.7vs9.7个月,P=0.009)。联合治疗组的ORR也较高(66.7%vs38.1%,P=0.009)和DCR(92.9%vs57.1%,P<0.001)。联合治疗组的AE大多是可控的,最常见的是肝脏转氨酶升高。
    在治疗中期肝癌时,TACE联合阿特珠单抗和贝伐单抗的生存获益显著高于单独TACE,治疗耐受性良好。
    UNASSIGNED: Combining transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) with systemic therapy has shown significant efficacy for intermediate-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) patients. This study aimed to validate the therapeutic efficacy of TACE combined with atezolizumab and bevacizumab (TACE + Atez/Bev) compared to TACE alone.
    UNASSIGNED: A retrospective study was conducted across three centers in China, encompassing 155 patients at the intermediate-stage of HCC. Propensity Score Matching (PSM) was used to minimize selection bias, with a ratio of 1:1. Primary outcomes were TACE-specific Progression-Free Survival (PFS) and Overall Survival (OS). Objective Response Rate (ORR) and Disease Control Rate (DCR) were assessed based on the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST). Adverse events (AEs) related to treatment were analyzed to evaluate safety.
    UNASSIGNED: Before PSM, the TACE + Atez/Bev group demonstrated extended median OS (not reached vs 20.3 months, P = 0.004) and PFS (20.0 months vs 9.8 months, P = 0.029) compared to the TACE-alone group. The TACE + Atez/Bev group also had a higher ORR (60.9% vs 41.3%, P = 0.026) and DCR (89.1% vs 58.7%, P < 0.001) than the TACE-alone group. After applying the PSM, the study included 42 pairs of patients. Compared to the TACE-alone group, the combination therapy group also showed significantly longer median OS (not reached vs 21.4 months, P = 0.008) and PFS (21.7 vs 9.7 months, P = 0.009). The combination therapy group also had a higher ORR (66.7% vs 38.1%, P = 0.009) and DCR (92.9% vs 57.1%, P < 0.001). AEs in the combination therapy group were mostly manageable, with the most common being elevated liver transaminase.
    UNASSIGNED: In treating intermediate-stage HCC, the survival benefit of combining TACE with atezolizumab and bevacizumab was significantly higher than TACE alone, and the treatment was well-tolerated.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:本研究旨在提出一种新的碘油联合药物洗脱珠经动脉化疗栓塞术(Lipiodol-DEBTACE)的方法,并比较单独使用DEB-TACE治疗不可切除的肝细胞癌(HCC)患者的安全性和有效性。
    方法:来自四个中心的数据库,对接受DEB-TACE或Lipiodol-DEBTACE作为初始治疗的HCC患者的记录进行回顾性评估.基于改良的实体瘤反应评估标准测量肿瘤反应。总生存期(OS),比较两组患者的无进展生存期(PFS)和不良事件(AE).
    结果:共包括244例患者,其中160例患者接受DEB-TACE,84例患者接受Lipiodol-DEBTACE。Lipiodol-DEBTACE组客观缓解率较高(86.9%vs.76.3%),更高的疾病控制率(97.6%vs.88.8%),较长的中位数OS(42.6vs.25.8个月)和更长的中位PFS(34.0vs.17.0个月)优于DEB-TACE组(P<0.05)。两组之间的AE发生率没有显着差异。Cox分析确定总胆红素水平,肿瘤最大直径,TACE方法和门静脉侵犯为独立预后因素。
    结论:对于选定的HCC患者,与单独的DEB-TACE相比,Lipiodol-DEBTACE是一种安全的选择,并且与改善的肿瘤反应和生存结局相关。
    OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to propose a novel approach of lipiodol combined with drug-eluting beads transarterial chemoembolization (Lipiodol-DEB TACE) and to compare the safety and efficacy with DEB-TACE alone for patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC).
    METHODS: From the database of four centers, the records of patients with HCC who received DEB-TACE or Lipiodol-DEB TACE as initial treatment were retrospectively evaluated. The tumor response was measured based on the Modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors. Overall survival (OS), progression-free survival (PFS) and adverse events (AEs) were compared between two groups.
    RESULTS: A total of 244 patients were included with 160 patients receiving DEB-TACE and 84 patients receiving Lipiodol-DEB TACE. Lipiodol-DEB TACE group had higher objective response rate (86.9 % vs. 76.3 %), higher disease control rate (97.6 % vs. 88.8 %), longer median OS (42.6 vs. 25.8 months) and longer median PFS (34.0 vs. 17.0 months) than DEB-TACE group (P < 0.05). There was no significant difference observed in the incidence of AEs between two groups. Cox analysis identified total bilirubin level, maximum tumor diameter, TACE method and portal vein invasion as independent prognostic factors.
    CONCLUSIONS: Lipiodol-DEB TACE was a safe option and associated with improved tumor response and survival outcome compared to DEB-TACE alone for selected patients with HCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    不可切除的肝细胞癌(uHCC)继续提出有效的治疗选择。本研究的目的是评估低剂量环磷酰胺联合乐伐替尼的疗效和安全性。pembrolizumab和经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)治疗uHCC。
    从2022年2月到2023年11月,共有40名诊断为uHCC的患者参加了这一小剂量,单中心,单臂,前瞻性研究。他们接受了低剂量环磷酰胺与乐伐替尼的联合治疗,pembrolizumab,和TACE。研究终点包括无进展生存期(PFS),客观反应率(ORR),和安全评估。使用改良的实体瘤反应评估标准(mRECIST)评估肿瘤反应,通过Kaplan-Meier曲线分析总生存期(OS)和PFS进行生存分析.根据美国国家癌症研究所不良事件通用术语标准(5.0版)评估不良事件(AE)。
    总共34名患者被纳入研究。中位随访时间为11.2[95%置信区间(95%CI),5.3-14.6]个月,中位PFS(mPFS)为15.5(95%CI,5.4-NA)个月。在研究期间未达到中位OS(mOS)。ORR为55.9%,疾病控制率(DCR)为70.6%。27例(79.4%)患者报告了不良事件。最常报告的不良事件(发生率>10%)包括肝功能异常(52.9%),腹痛(44.1%),腹胀和便秘(29.4%),高血压(20.6%),白细胞减少症(17.6%),便秘(17.6%),腹水(14.7%),失眠(14.7%)。肝功能异常(14.7%)最常见的是3级或更高的AE。
    低剂量环磷酰胺与乐伐替尼的组合,pembrolizumab,TACE对uHCC是安全有效的,展示了管理uHCC的有前途的治疗策略。
    UNASSIGNED: Unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma (uHCC) continues to pose effective treatment options. The objective of this study was to assess the efficacy and safety of combining low-dose cyclophosphamide with lenvatinib, pembrolizumab and transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) for the treatment of uHCC.
    UNASSIGNED: From February 2022 to November 2023, a total of 40 patients diagnosed with uHCC were enrolled in this small-dose, single-center, single-arm, prospective study. They received a combined treatment of low-dose cyclophosphamide with lenvatinib, pembrolizumab, and TACE. Study endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety assessment. Tumor response was assessed using the modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (mRECIST), while survival analysis was conducted through Kaplan-Meier curve analysis for overall survival (OS) and PFS. Adverse events (AEs) were evaluated according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 5.0).
    UNASSIGNED: A total of 34 patients were included in the study. The median follow-up duration was 11.2 [95% confidence interval (95% CI), 5.3-14.6] months, and the median PFS (mPFS) was 15.5 (95% CI, 5.4-NA) months. Median OS (mOS) was not attained during the study period. The ORR was 55.9%, and the disease control rate (DCR) was 70.6%. AEs were reported in 27 (79.4%) patients. The most frequently reported AEs (with an incidence rate >10%) included abnormal liver function (52.9%), abdominal pain (44.1%), abdominal distension and constipation (29.4%), hypertension (20.6%), leukopenia (17.6%), constipation (17.6%), ascites (14.7%), and insomnia (14.7%). Abnormal liver function (14.7%) had the most common grade 3 or higher AEs.
    UNASSIGNED: A combination of low-dose cyclophosphamide with lenvatinib, pembrolizumab, and TACE is safe and effective for uHCC, showcasing a promising therapeutic strategy for managing uHCC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    经动脉化疗栓塞(TACE)在晚期肝细胞癌(HCC)治疗中的作用尚未得到证实。本研究旨在评估免疫检查点抑制剂(ICIs)加抗血管内皮生长因子(抗VEGF)抗体/酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKIs)的疗效和安全性,无论是否使用TACE作为晚期HCC的一线治疗。
    这个全国性的,多中心,回顾性队列研究包括2018年1月至2022年12月期间接受TACE联合ICIs+抗VEGF抗体/TKIs(TACE-ICI-VEGF)或仅接受ICIs+抗VEGF抗体/TKIs(ICI-VEGF)的晚期HCC患者.研究设计遵循目标试验仿真框架,具有稳定的治疗加权逆概率(sIPTW)以最小化偏差。主要结果是总生存期(OS)。次要结局包括无进展生存期(PFS),客观反应率(ORR),和安全。这项研究在ClinicalTrials.gov注册,NCT05332821。
    在分析中包括的1244名患者中,802例(64.5%)患者接受TACE-ICI-VEGF治疗,442例(35.5%)患者接受ICI-VEGF治疗.中位随访时间为21.1个月和20.6个月,分别。SIPTW的应用后,两组的基线特征平衡良好.TACE-ICI-VEGF组的中位OS显著改善(22.6个月[95%CI:21.2-23.9]vs15.9个月[14.9-17.8];P<0.0001;校正风险比[aHR]0.63[95%CI:0.53-0.75])。根据实体瘤(RECIST)1.1版的疗效评估标准,TACE-ICI-VEGF组的中位PFS也更长(9.9个月[9.1-10.6]比7.4个月[6.7-8.5];P<0.0001;aHR0.74[0.65-0.85])。在TACE-ICI-VEGF组中观察到更高的ORR,通过RECISTv1.1或修改后的RECIST(41.2%对22.9%,P<0.0001;47.3%vs29.7%,P<0.0001)。TACE-ICI-VEGF组178例(22.2%),ICI-VEGF组80例(18.1%)发生≥3级不良事件。
    这项多中心研究支持使用TACE联合ICIs和抗VEGF抗体/TKIs作为晚期HCC的一线治疗,显示可接受的安全性。
    国家自然科学基金,国家重点研究发展计划,江苏省医学创新中心,江苏省高等学校放射医学协同创新中心,和南京生命健康科技项目。
    UNASSIGNED: The role of transarterial chemoembolization (TACE) in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is unconfirmed. This study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) plus anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) antibody/tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) with or without TACE as first-line treatment for advanced HCC.
    UNASSIGNED: This nationwide, multicenter, retrospective cohort study included advanced HCC patients receiving either TACE with ICIs plus anti-VEGF antibody/TKIs (TACE-ICI-VEGF) or only ICIs plus anti-VEGF antibody/TKIs (ICI-VEGF) from January 2018 to December 2022. The study design followed the target trial emulation framework with stabilized inverse probability of treatment weighting (sIPTW) to minimize biases. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Secondary outcomes included progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), and safety. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05332821.
    UNASSIGNED: Among 1244 patients included in the analysis, 802 (64.5%) patients received TACE-ICI-VEGF treatment, and 442 (35.5%) patients received ICI-VEGF treatment. The median follow-up time was 21.1 months and 20.6 months, respectively. Post-application of sIPTW, baseline characteristics were well-balanced between the two groups. TACE-ICI-VEGF group exhibited a significantly improved median OS (22.6 months [95% CI: 21.2-23.9] vs 15.9 months [14.9-17.8]; P < 0.0001; adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.63 [95% CI: 0.53-0.75]). Median PFS was also longer in TACE-ICI-VEGF group (9.9 months [9.1-10.6] vs 7.4 months [6.7-8.5]; P < 0.0001; aHR 0.74 [0.65-0.85]) per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) version 1.1. A higher ORR was observed in TACE-ICI-VEGF group, by either RECIST v1.1 or modified RECIST (41.2% vs 22.9%, P < 0.0001; 47.3% vs 29.7%, P < 0.0001). Grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 178 patients (22.2%) in TACE-ICI-VEGF group and 80 patients (18.1%) in ICI-VEGF group.
    UNASSIGNED: This multicenter study supports the use of TACE combined with ICIs and anti-VEGF antibody/TKIs as first-line treatment for advanced HCC, demonstrating an acceptable safety profile.
    UNASSIGNED: National Natural Science Foundation of China, National Key Research and Development Program of China, Jiangsu Provincial Medical Innovation Center, Collaborative Innovation Center of Radiation Medicine of Jiangsu Higher Education Institutions, and Nanjing Life Health Science and Technology Project.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

公众号