Tobacco, Smokeless

烟草,无烟
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    亚洲的口喉癌(OPCs)占全球负担的42%,占相关死亡的50%以上。在西半球,超过70%的OPC病例涉及人乳头瘤病毒(HPV)。但它在东半球的作用尚不清楚。本研究回顾了OPC流行病学,包括患病率,病因(如无烟烟草和HPV),和他们的互动。在SEAR国家中,印度的HPV相关OPCs发病率最高,为38.4%。虽然大多数非洲国家都没有数据,只有14%的发病率报告。相反,美洲地区是HPV阳性率最高的地区之一,在美国不同州达到65%,而巴西报告的发病率高达38%。在欧盟,英国的HPV相关OPC发病率最高,达到52%。在西太平洋地区,新西兰的发病率最高,高达78%。在东南亚国家,无烟烟草消费量较高,HPV感染率相对较低,表明两者之间存在负相关。根据我们的文献检索,全球最常用的检测方法是p16的免疫组织化学和聚合链式反应。OPCs是全球健康问题,正确的识别和分类至关重要。HPV驱动的癌症有更好的生存率,强调需要根据HPV阳性或HPV阴性癌症的负担对特定问题领域进行重点研究。
    Oropharyngeal cancers (OPCs) in Asia account for 42% of the global burden and over 50% of related deaths. Human papillomavirus (HPV) is involved in over 70% of OPC cases in the Western hemisphere, but its role in the Eastern hemisphere is unclear. This study reviews OPC epidemiology, including prevalence, etiological factors (such as smokeless tobacco and HPV), and their interaction. Among the SEAR countries, India had the highest incidence of HPV-related OPCs at 38.4%, while data were unavailable for most African countries, with only a 14% incidence reported. Conversely, the American region exhibited one of the highest HPV positivity rates, reaching up to 65% in different states of the USA, while Brazil reported an incidence of up to 38%. In the European Union, the UK had the highest incidence of HPV-associated OPC, reaching up to 52%. In the Western Pacific region, New Zealand demonstrated the highest incidence at up to 78%. Smokeless tobacco consumption was higher in SEAR countries, which had a relatively lower incidence of HPV infection, suggesting a negative correlation between the two. Based on our literature search, the most common detection methods used globally are immunohistochemistry for p16 and polymerized chain reaction. OPCs are a global health concern, and proper identification and classification are vital. HPV-driven cancers have better survival rates, emphasizing the need for focused research on specific problem areas based on the burden of HPV-positive or HPV-negative cancers.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    无烟烟草(SLT)对健康造成许多负面影响。尽管它在世界各地的社会中长期存在,SLT对健康的影响在最近几十年才得到严格的研究.本系统综述和荟萃分析旨在巩固现有研究,以全面了解育龄妇女使用SLT的全球患病率。相关文章是从PubMed等数据库中提取的,EMBASE,WebofScience,和Scopus从成立到2023年11月11日。包括报告育龄妇女中SLT使用者数量的观察性研究。使用JoannaBriggs研究所(JBI)工具评估研究质量。荟萃分析使用随机效应模型来确定SLT患病率,在森林地块等统计工具的支持下,I2统计,和敏感性分析,以确保结果的准确性和全面性。所有统计分析均在R版本4.3中进行。从涉及2,053,667名参与者的10项研究中,育龄妇女使用SLT的合并患病率为9.3%(95%CI:0.038至0.21),研究之间具有显著的异质性(I2=100%)。研究中怀疑有发表偏倚。敏感性分析和亚组分析不能解决异质性。我们的分析表明,育龄妇女使用SLT的患病率很高,尤其是在低社会经济和像印度这样的发展中国家,巴基斯坦,和尼泊尔。对于育龄妇女来说,使用无烟烟草(SLT)会导致不孕,妊娠并发症,和不良的胎儿结局,包括低出生体重和早产。结果强调了采取特定公共卫生措施和政策变化以减少育龄妇女SLT消费的必要性。需要进一步的研究来调查该组中使用SLT的原因,并评估干预策略的影响。指导更有效的公共卫生举措和政策。
    Smokeless tobacco (SLT) poses many negative health impacts. Despite its longstanding presence in societies across the world, the health implications of SLT have only been rigorously studied in recent decades. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to consolidate existing research to provide a comprehensive understanding of the global prevalence of SLT use among women of reproductive age. Relevant articles were extracted from databases such as PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and Scopus from their inception until November 11, 2023. Observational studies reporting the number of SLT users among women of reproductive age were included. The quality of the studies was assessed using the Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) tool. The meta-analysis used a random-effects model to determine SLT prevalence, supported by statistical tools like forest plots, I2 statistics, and sensitivity analyses to ensure the accuracy and comprehensiveness of the results. All statistical analyses were performed in R version 4.3. From 10 studies involving 2,053,667 participants, a pooled prevalence for SLT use among women of reproductive age was found to be 9.3% (95% CI: 0.038 to 0.21), with significant heterogeneity among studies (I2 = 100%). Publication bias was suspected among the studies. Sensitivity analysis and subgroup analysis couldn\'t resolve the heterogeneity. Our analysis shows a significant prevalence of SLT use in women of reproductive age, especially in low socioeconomic and developing countries like India, Pakistan, and Nepal. For women of reproductive age, the use of smokeless tobacco (SLT) can lead to infertility, pregnancy complications, and adverse fetal outcomes, including low birth weight and preterm birth. The results highlight the necessity for specific public health measures and policy changes to decrease SLT consumption among reproductive-age women. Further studies are needed to investigate the reasons behind SLT usage in this group and to assess the impact of intervention strategies, to guide more effective public health initiatives and policies.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Review
    尼古丁袋是无烟草产品,在英国越来越受欢迎。它们被夹在使用者的嘴唇和口香糖之间,以提供尼古丁的来源。这篇文章描述了尼古丁袋的组成,围绕其生产和销售的合法性,使用模式,并探讨其使用可能的口腔和一般健康影响。
    Nicotine pouches are tobacco-free products that are becoming increasingly popular in the UK. They are held between the user\'s lip and gum to provide a source of nicotine. This article describes the composition of nicotine pouches, the legality surrounding their production and sale, patterns of use and explores possible oral and general health effects of their usage.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    这项系统评价的主要目的是评估癌症风险,和癌症诊断后的死亡率,对于瑞典鼻烟的独家用户,与非烟草使用者相比。我们遵循了系统评价的国际标准,并使用GRADE方法对风险估计进行了评级。我们的搜索给出了2450篇文章,其中67项根据我们的纳入标准进行了全文评估。其中,该综述包括14项队列研究和1项病例对照研究。这些研究调查了口腔或口咽部癌症的风险(3项研究),食管(1项研究),胃(1项研究),胰腺(2项研究),结肠直肠(2项研究),肛门(1项研究)和肺(1项研究),以及恶性淋巴瘤(1项研究),白血病和多发性骨髓瘤(1项研究),黑色素瘤(1项研究),任何癌症(1项研究)和癌症诊断后的死亡率(4项研究)。癌症风险只能在男性中进行评估,因为女性普遍缺乏数据。所有纳入的研究都被评估为具有中等偏倚风险,主要与曝光信息的有效性有关。食道癌的风险增加,胰腺,据报道,胃和直肠以及鼻烟的使用与癌症诊断后死亡率增加之间的关联。我们对各种风险估计的信心从中等到低到非常低。
    The main objective of this systematic review was to assess cancer risk, and mortality after cancer diagnosis, for exclusive users of Swedish snus, compared with non-users of tobacco. We followed international standards for systematic reviews and graded our confidence in the risk estimates using the GRADE approach. Our search gave 2450 articles, of which 67 were assessed in full text against our inclusion criteria. Of these, 14 cohort-studies and one case-control study were included in the review. The studies investigated risk of cancer in the oral cavity or oropharynx (3 studies), esophagus (1 study), stomach (1 study), pancreas (2 studies), colorectum (2 studies), anus (1 study) and lung (1 study), as well as malignant lymphoma (1 study), leukemia and multiple myeloma (1 study), melanoma (1 study), any cancer (1 study) and mortality after cancer diagnosis (4 studies). Cancer risk could only be evaluated in men as there was a general lack of data for women. All included studies were evaluated to have a moderate risk of bias, mostly related to validity of exposure information. An increased risk of cancer of the esophagus, pancreas, stomach and rectum as well as an association between use of snus and increased mortality after a cancer diagnosis was reported. Our confidence in the various risk estimates varied from moderate through low to very low.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:无烟烟草,全球超过3亿人使用,导致大量的发病率和死亡率。对于无烟烟草控制,许多国家采取了超越世界卫生组织烟草控制框架公约的政策,这有助于降低吸烟率。这些政策(在《烟草控制框架公约》之内和之外)对无烟烟草使用的影响仍不清楚。我们旨在系统地审查与无烟烟草及其背景相关的政策,并调查其对无烟烟草使用的影响。
    方法:在这篇系统综述中,我们在2005年1月1日至2021年9月20日之间以英语和南亚主要语言搜索了11个电子数据库和灰色文献,总结无烟烟草政策及其影响。纳入标准是对无烟烟草使用者的所有类型的研究,这些研究自2005年以来提到了任何无烟烟草相关政策,但系统评价除外。组织或私人机构发布的政策被排除在外,以及对电子烟和电子尼古丁输送系统的研究,除非减少危害或转换被评估为戒烟策略。两名审稿人独立筛选文章,标准化后提取数据。使用有效公共卫生实践项目的质量评估工具评估研究质量。影响评估的结果包括无烟烟草流行率,摄取,停止,和健康影响。由于对政策和结果的描述存在很大的异质性,数据是描述性和叙述性综合的。该系统评价在PROSPERO(CRD42020191946)中注册。
    结果:确定了14317条记录,其中252项符合条件的研究被纳入描述无烟烟草政策的研究。57个国家有针对无烟烟草的政策,其中17家有无烟烟草控制框架公约之外的政策(例如,吐痰禁令)。18项研究评估了影响,质量可变(六个强,七个温和的,和五个弱),并主要报告无烟烟草使用的流行率。根据《烟草控制框架公约》评估政策举措的工作机构发现,这些举措与税收方面的无烟烟草流行率降低4·4%至30·3%以及多方面政策方面的22·2%和70·9%有关。两项评估非框架销售禁令政策的研究报告了无烟烟草销售(6·4%)和使用(性别17·6%)的显着减少;一项研究,然而,据报道,在全面禁止销售后,年轻人无烟烟草的使用有增加的趋势,可能是由于跨境走私。一项报告戒烟的研究发现,暴露于烟草控制政策框架公约的个人戒烟尝试增加了13·3%(47·5%):教育,通信,培训,和公众意识,与未暴露者相比(34·2%)。
    结论:许多国家实施了无烟烟草控制政策,包括超出《烟草控制框架公约》的范围。现有证据表明,税收和多方面的政策举措与有效减少无烟烟草使用有关。
    背景:英国国立卫生研究院。
    Smokeless tobacco, used by more than 300 million people globally, results in substantial morbidity and mortality. For smokeless tobacco control, many countries have adopted policies beyond the WHO Framework Convention on Tobacco Control, which has been instrumental in reducing smoking prevalence. The impact of these policies (within and outside the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control) on smokeless tobacco use remains unclear. We aimed to systematically review policies that are relevant to smokeless tobacco and its context and investigate their impact on smokeless tobacco use.
    In this systematic review, we searched 11 electronic databases and grey literature between Jan 1, 2005, and Sept 20, 2021, in English and key south Asian languages, to summarise smokeless tobacco policies and their impact. Inclusion criteria were all types of studies on smokeless tobacco users that mentioned any smokeless tobacco relevant policies since 2005, except systematic reviews. Policies issued by organisations or private institutions were excluded as well as studies on e-cigarettes and Electronic Nicotine Delivery System except where harm reduction or switching were evaluated as a tobacco cessation strategy. Two reviewers independently screened articles, and data were extracted after standardisation. Quality of studies was appraised using the Effective Public Health Practice Project\'s Quality Assessment Tool. Outcomes for impact assessment included smokeless tobacco prevalence, uptake, cessation, and health effects. Due to substantial heterogeneity in the descriptions of policies and outcomes, data were descriptively and narratively synthesised. This systematic review was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42020191946).
    14 317 records were identified, of which 252 eligible studies were included as describing smokeless tobacco policies. 57 countries had policies targeting smokeless tobacco, of which 17 had policies outside the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control for smokeless tobacco (eg, spitting bans). 18 studies evaluated the impact, which were of variable quality (six strong, seven moderate, and five weak) and reported mainly on prevalence of smokeless tobacco use. The body of work evaluating policy initiatives based on the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control found that these initiatives were associated with reductions in smokeless tobacco prevalence of between 4·4% and 30·3% for taxation and 22·2% and 70·9% for multifaceted policies. Two studies evaluating the non-Framework policy of sales bans reported significant reductions in smokeless tobacco sale (6·4%) and use (combined sex 17·6%); one study, however, reported an increased trend in smokeless tobacco use in the youth after a total sales ban, likely due to cross-border smuggling. The one study reporting on cessation found a 13·3% increase in quit attempts in individuals exposed (47·5%) to Framework Convention on Tobacco Control policy: education, communication, training, and public awareness, compared with non-exposed (34·2%).
    Many countries have implemented smokeless tobacco control policies, including those that extend beyond the Framework Convention on Tobacco Control. The available evidence suggests that taxation and multifaceted policy initiatives are associated with meaningful reductions in smokeless tobacco use.
    UK National Institute for Health Research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Meta-Analysis
    目的:了解泛美卫生组织(PAHO)地区无烟烟草(SLT)的使用情况及其与口腔潜在恶性疾病(OPMDs)和头颈癌(HNC)的相关性。
    方法:对9个数据库和其他来源进行了文献检索。合格标准为儿童(0-18岁)和成人(19岁及以上)人群,使用任何类型的SLT。进行荟萃分析以确定PAHO地区SLT的患病率及其使用与OPMDs/HNC之间的关联;发展,并使用评估工具验证证据的确定性。
    结果:纳入了来自6个泛美卫生组织国家的59项研究,其中51人也进行了定量分析。合并的SLT使用率为15%(95CI:11.93-18.69),成人中17%(95CI:13.25-22.65),儿科人群中占11%(95CI:8.54-14.78)。委内瑞拉报告的SLT使用率最高,为33.4%(95CI:27.17-39.93)。HNC与SLT使用呈正相关(OR=1.98,95CI:1.54-2.55),具有适度的证据确定性。在OPMD中,只有白斑报告与SLT使用呈正相关(OR=8.38;95CI:1.05-67.25).然而,证据的质量很低。
    结论:SLT使用的高消耗,咀嚼烟草和鼻烟,据报道,在居住在泛美卫生组织地区的成年人口中,与口腔白斑和HNC的发展呈正相关。
    To determine the prevalence of smokeless tobacco (SLT) use and its association with oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) and head and neck cancer (HNC) in the Pan-American Health Organization (PAHO) region.
    A literature search was conducted across 9 databases and other sources. The eligibility criteria were pediatric (0-18 years old) and adult (19 years and older) populations consuming any type of SLT. Meta-analysis was performed to determine the prevalence of SLT and the association between its use and OPMDs/HNC in the PAHO region; the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development, and Evaluation tool was used to verify the certainty of evidence.
    Fifty-nine studies from 6 PAHO countries were included, of which 51 were also subjected to quantitative analysis. The pooled SLT prevalence of use was 15% (95%CI: 11.93-18.69) overall, 17% (95%CI: 13.25-22.65) in adults, and 11% (95%CI: 8.54-14.78) in the pediatric population. The highest reported SLT prevalence of use was 33.4% (95%CI: 27.17-39.93) in Venezuela. HNC was positively associated with SLT use (OR = 1.98, 95%CI: 1.54-2.55), with a moderate certainty of evidence. Among OPMDs, only leukoplakia reported a positive association with SLT use (OR = 8.38; 95%CI: 1.05-67.25). However, the quality of the evidence was very low.
    A high consumption of SLT use, chewing tobacco and snuff, is reported among the adult population residing in the PAHO region with a positive association with the development of oral leukoplakia and HNC.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    背景:对无烟烟草(SLT)依赖性措施的心理测量特性的质量进行全面评估是必要的,以帮助研究人员和卫生专业人员在评估依赖性和计划戒烟治疗时决定使用最合适的措施。本系统审查的目的是确定和严格评估评估对SLT产品依赖程度的措施。
    方法:研究小组搜索了MEDLINE,CINAHL,PsycINFO,EMBASE和SCOPUS数据库。我们包括英语研究,描述了SLT依赖性度量的发展或心理测量特性。两名评审员使用严格的基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准(COSMIN)指南独立提取数据并评估偏倚风险。
    结果:16项研究评估了16项独特指标,符合评估条件。在美国进行了11项研究;两个在台湾,每个在瑞典,孟加拉国,还有关岛.在16项措施中,根据COSMIN标准,没有一项措施被评为"A"(可推荐使用),主要是由于结构有效性和内部一致性的限制.九项措施(FTND-ST,FTQ-ST-9,FTQ-ST-10,OSSTD,BQDS,BQDI,HONC,AUTOS和STDS)被评为“B”:具有评估依赖性的潜力,尽管需要进一步评估心理测量特性。四项措施,MFTND-ST,TDS,GN-STBQ和SSTDS具有测量性能不足的高质量证据,被评为“C”,不支持根据COSMIN标准使用。其余三项简短措施HSTI,由于无法评估结构有效性,ST-QFI和STDI(包含<3个项目)被评定为不确定(因素分析至少需要3个项目),这是根据COSMIN框架的建议评估内部一致性的先决条件。
    结论:当前评估SLT产品依赖性的工具需要进一步验证。考虑到与这些工具的结构有效性相关的问题,可能还需要开发新的措施,供临床医生和研究人员用于评估对SLT产品的依赖。
    未经评估:CRD42018105878。
    A comprehensive assessment of the quality of the psychometric properties of smokeless tobacco (SLT) dependence measures is necessary to help researchers and health professionals decide on the most appropriate measure to use when assessing dependence and planning cessation treatment. The aim of this systematic review was to identify and critically appraise measures for assessing dependence on SLT products.
    The study team searched MEDLINE, CINAHL, PsycINFO, EMBASE and SCOPUS databases. We included English-language studies describing the development or psychometric properties of an SLT dependence measure. Two reviewers independently extracted data and appraised risk of bias using the rigorous Consensus-based Standards for the selection of health Measurement Instruments (COSMIN) guidelines.
    Sixteen studies assessing 16 unique measures were eligible for assessment. Eleven studies were conducted in the United States; two in Taiwan and one each in Sweden, Bangladesh, and Guam. Of the sixteen measures, none of the measures was rated as \"A\" (can be recommended for use) as per COSMIN standards primarily due to limitations in structural validity and internal consistency. Nine measures (FTND-ST, FTQ-ST-9, FTQ-ST-10, OSSTD, BQDS, BQDI, HONC, AUTOS and STDS) were rated as \"B\": having potential for assessing dependence, although further assessment of psychometric properties is needed. Four measures, MFTND-ST, TDS, GN-STBQ and SSTDS having high quality evidence for an insufficient measurement property were rated as \"C\" and were not supported for use as per COSMIN standards. The remaining three brief measures HSTI, ST-QFI and STDI (consisting of <3 items) were rated inconclusive due to the inability of assessment of structural validity (minimum 3 items required for factor analysis), which is a prerequisite for assessment of internal consistency per the recommendations by the COSMIN framework.
    Further validation is required for the current tools that assess dependence on SLT products. Given the concerns related to the structural validity of these tools, a need may also exist to develop new measures for use by clinicians and researchers for assessing dependence on SLT products.
    CRD42018105878.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Review
    本文旨在综述鼻腔兴奋剂在人际交往中的运用。文献调查来自PubMed,阿纳多卢大学ProQuest中央数据库,谷歌学者。纵观历史,各种材料已被用作鼻腔兴奋剂,以进行密集的交流和社交。鼻烟是吸入鼻孔的烟草。它通过鼻粘膜进入血液并影响神经系统。马拉斯粉也是土耳其东南部常见的无烟烟草类型,尤其是在加济安泰普和马拉斯,它给产品起了名字。可卡因是由古柯植物制成的,它可以是粉末和岩石的形式。岩石也被称为裂缝。它穿过鼻孔并被血液吸收,导致偏执狂,失眠,极端的能量,和更多的信心。当提到催产素时,一些积极的话浮现在脑海中,比如社交,关系,信任的感觉,和理解。它是一种激素和神经递质。在最短的时间内增加人际交往是当今的一个重要问题。在线会议,不同的人在计算机上同时处理同一文件的能力,使个人彼此保持距离,减少他们之间的交流。尽管处于相同的社会环境中,朋友经常用智能手机与他人交流,而不是面对面的关系。增加人际沟通经验,涉及饮酒的事件是最常用的事件。鼻烟,可卡因,裂纹,和催产素废除了自我控制,这会在一天结束时对人际沟通产生负面影响。
    The aim of this paper is to review the use of nasal stimulants in interpersonal communication. The literature survey was performed from PubMed, ProQuest Central database of Anadolu University, and Google Scholar. Throughout history, various materials have been used as nasal stimulants to communicate and socialize intensively. Snuff is tobacco inhaled into the nostrils. It goes through the nasal mucosa into the blood and affects the neural system. Maras Powder is also a smokeless tobacco type common in the southeast of Turkey, especially in Gaziantep and Maras, which gave its name to the product. Cocaine is made from the coca plant, and it can be in the form of powder and rock. The rock one is also known as crack. It passes through the nostrils and is absorbed in the blood, causing paranoias, sleeplessness, extreme energy, and more confidence. When oxytocin is said, some positive words come to mind, such as socializing, relationships, feeling of trust, and understanding. It is a hormone and neurotransmitter. Increasing interpersonal communication in the shortest time is an important issue today. Online meetings, the ability of different people to work on the same file simultaneously over the computer, cause individuals to distance themselves from each other and decrease communication among them. Despite being in the same social environment, friends often communicate with others with their smartphones instead of having face-to-face relations. To increase interpersonal communication experience, events involving alcohol take is the mostly commonly used one. Nasal snuff, cocaine, crack, and oxytocin abolish self-control which affects interpersonal communication negatively at the end of the day.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    目的:无烟烟草是一个异质性的产品组,在全球范围内具有不同的组成和流行程度。由于不良妊娠结局的风险和对儿童健康的影响,怀孕期间的烟草使用令人担忧。尼古丁可以介导这些作用中的几种。这项系统评价测量了怀孕期间使用瑞典无烟烟草(鼻烟)的健康结果。
    方法:文献检索由信息专家于2022年5月进行。我们纳入了怀孕期间使用鼻烟与不使用烟草相比的人体研究,评估的偏见风险,进行了荟萃分析,并使用GRADE评估了效果估计的置信度。
    结果:我们纳入了18项队列研究(42至1006398名参与者)。怀孕期间使用Snus可能(对风险估计的适度信心)会增加新生儿呼吸暂停的风险,调整后的比值比(95%置信区间)[aOR(95%CI)]1.96(1.30至2.96)。怀孕期间使用Snus可能会增加死胎的风险(对风险估计的信心较低),OR1.43(1.02至1.99);极端早产,OR1.69(1.17至2.45);适度早产,OR1.26(1.15至1.38);小的胎龄(SGA),OR1.26(1.09至1.46);和减少出生体重平均差异72.47克(110.58克至34.35克减少)和口腔裂隙畸形,OR1.48(1.00至2.21)。它是不确定的(对风险估计的信心低,CI交叉1)怀孕期间使用鼻烟是否会影响先兆子痫的风险,OR1.11(0.97至1.28);产前出血,OR1.15(0.92至1.44)和非常早产,OR1.26(0.95至1.66)。早期新生儿死亡和心率变异性改变的风险是不确定的,信心很低。使用鼻烟的母亲增加了剖腹产的患病率,低信心。
    结论:这项系统评价显示,在怀孕期间使用无烟烟草(鼻烟)可能会对发育中的儿童产生不利影响。
    Smokeless tobacco is a heterogeneous product group with diverse composition and prevalence globally. Tobacco use during pregnancy is concerning due to the risk of adverse pregnancy outcomes and effects on child health. Nicotine may mediate several of these effects. This systematic review measured health outcomes from Swedish smokeless tobacco (snus) use during pregnancy.
    Literature search was conducted by an information specialist in May 2022. We included human studies of snus use during pregnancy compared with no tobacco use, assessed risk of bias, conducted a meta-analysis and assessed confidence in effect-estimates using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations (GRADE).
    We included 18 cohort studies (42 to 1 006 398 participants). Snus use during pregnancy probably (moderate confidence in risk estimates) increase the risk of neonatal apnea, adjusted odds ratio 95% confidence interval [aOR (95% CI)] 1.96 (1.30 to 2.96). Snus use during pregnancy possibly (low confidence in risk estimates) increase the risk of stillbirths aOR 1.43 (1.02 to 1.99), extremely premature births aOR 1.69 (1.17 to 2.45), moderately premature birth aOR 1.26 (1.15 to 1.38), SGA aOR 1.26 (1.09 to 1.46), reduced birth weight mean difference of 72.47 g (110.58 g to 34.35 g reduction) and oral cleft malformations aOR 1.48 (1.00 to 2.21). It is uncertain (low confidence in risk estimates, CI crossing 1) whether snus use during pregnancy affects risk of preeclampsia aOR 1.11 (0.97 to 1.28), antenatal bleeding aOR 1.15 (0.92 to 1.44) and very premature birth aOR 1.26 (0.95 to 1.66). Risk of early neonatal mortality and altered heart rate variability is uncertain, very low confidence. Snus using mothers had increased prevalence of caesarean sections, low confidence.
    This systematic review reveals that use of smokeless tobacco (snus) during pregnancy may adversely impact the developing child.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

  • 文章类型: Systematic Review
    虽然年轻人的吸烟率正在下降,无烟烟草的使用正在增加。确定谁在使用无烟烟草,以及为什么在防止无烟烟草使用方面至关重要。本研究旨在全面探讨西方国家青少年使用无烟烟草的因素,找出研究空白。
    我们对2011年1月至2021年9月发表的西方国家年轻人(13-29岁)使用无烟烟草相关因素的研究进行了系统范围审查。在CINAHL中进行了搜索,Medline,还有Scopus.对成年人的研究,烟草总使用量(即,没有区分烟草产品类型),烟草的双重和多重用途,无烟戒烟计划的研究被排除在外。
    本次范围审查共纳入160项研究。这些研究主要在美国和斯堪的纳维亚国家进行,大多数人探索无烟烟草的使用,而没有区分具体类型。无烟烟草使用者更可能是男性,非西班牙裔白人,从事体力活动,使用其他物质,包括香烟和酒精。朋友和家人的作用被确定为与使用无烟烟草有关的关键因素。
    这项范围界定审查表明,针对无烟烟草使用的预防措施应侧重于同伴和家庭成员的角色,这些措施可能会受益于针对男性。额外的研究,包括对这一领域的系统审查,以验证已确定的相关因素,将提高对无烟烟草使用的认识。
    While smoking is declining among young people, smokeless tobacco use is increasing. Identifying who is using smokeless tobacco and why is essential in preventing smokeless tobacco use. This study aimed to comprehensively explore the factors of young people\'s use of smokeless tobacco in western countries and identify research gaps.
    We conducted a systematic scoping review of studies that examined factors associated with smokeless tobacco use among young people (ages 13-29) from western countries published between January 2011 and September 2021. Searches were conducted in CINAHL, Medline, and Scopus. Studies on adults, total tobacco use (i.e., did not differentiate between tobacco product types), dual and multiple uses of tobacco, and studies on smokeless tobacco cessation programs were excluded.
    A total of 160 studies were included in this scoping review. The studies were primarily undertaken in the US and the Scandinavian countries, and the majority explored smokeless tobacco use without distinguishing between the specific types. Smokeless tobacco users were more likely to be male, non-Hispanic white, engaging in physical activity, and using other substances, including cigarettes and alcohol. The role of friends and family were identified as critical factors that were related to the use of smokeless tobacco.
    This scoping review suggests that preventative measures against smokeless tobacco use should focus on peer and family members\' roles and that these measures may benefit from targeting males. Additional research, including systematic reviews on this area to validate the identified associated factors, would improve the understanding of smokeless tobacco use.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

    求助全文

公众号