Thermometry

测温
  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    在过去的十年里,化学和光子学的技术进步使得能够实时测量纳米级的温度。纳米温度计,专门设计用于传递这些纳米级温度变化的探头,提供高温度,temporal,空间分辨率和精度。已经提出了几种不同的方法,包括微热电偶,基于发光和荧光偏振各向异性的纳米温度计。基于各向异性的纳米温度计在生物相容性方面表现出色,因为它们可以由与染料共轭的内源性蛋白质构建而成,最小化任何系统扰动。此外,产生的荧光蛋白可以保留其天然结构和活性,同时进行温度测量,允许在任何给定的实验系统中从天然环境或酶促反应期间进行精确的温度记录。为了便于将来在研究中使用这些纳米温度计,在这里,我们提出了一个理论模型,可以预测从任何蛋白质或染料开始的基于各向异性的温度计的最佳灵敏度,基于蛋白质大小和染料荧光寿命。使用这个模型,大多数蛋白质和染料可以转化为纳米温度计。科学界广泛的学科使用这些纳米温度计将带来新的知识和理解,这些知识和理解今天仍然无法使用当前的技术。
    In the last decade, technological advances in chemistry and photonics have enabled real-time measurement of temperature at the nanoscale. Nanothermometers, probes specifically designed to relay these nanoscale temperature changes, provide a high degree of temperature, temporal, and spatial resolution and precision. Several different approaches have been proposed, including microthermocouples, luminescence and fluorescence polarization anisotropy-based nanothermometers. Anisotropy-based nanothermometers excel in terms of biocompatibility because they can be built from endogenous proteins conjugated to dyes, minimizing any system perturbation. Moreover, the resulting fluorescent proteins can retain their native structure and activity while performing the temperature measurement, allowing precise temperature recordings from the native environment or during an enzymatic reaction in any given experimental system. To facilitate the future use of these nanothermometers in research, here we present a theoretical model that predicts the optimal sensitivity for anisotropy-based thermometers starting with any protein or dye, based on protein size and dye fluorescence lifetime. Using this model, most proteins and dyes can be converted to nanothermometers. The utilization of these nanothermometers by a broad spectrum of disciplines within the scientific community will bring new knowledge and understanding that today remains unavailable with current techniques.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

       PDF(Pubmed)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    我们的病人在手术室的安全的重要性,推动了许多项目。其中大多数旨在更好的控制和临床表现;主要是干预或调节外科手术结果的变量,和他们有直接的关系.西班牙麻醉学学会,重症监护和治疗疼痛(SEDAR)保持对一个变量的持续关注,这个变量清楚地决定了我们临床过程的结果,所有接受麻醉或外科手术的患者都会出现“无意的低体温”。SEDAR提倡,与其他科学协会和患者协会合作,本临床实践指南的阐述,旨在回答尚未解决的临床问题,到现在为止,没有基于现有最佳科学证据的文件。在伊比利亚-美洲科克伦合作办公室的分级方法和技术援助下,本临床实践指南为预防体温过低的主动加热方法提出了三个建议(弱赞成)(皮肤,液体或气体);三个用于优先考虑预防体温过低的策略(太弱赞成,一个强烈赞成);麻醉诱导前的两种预热策略(均弱赞成);和两个用于研究。
    The importance of the safety of our patients in the surgical theatre, has driven many projects. The majority of them aimed at better control and clinical performance; mainly of the variables that intervene or modulate the results of surgical procedures, and have a direct relationship with them. The Spanish Society of Anesthesiology, Critical Care and Therapeutic Pain (SEDAR), maintains a constant concern for a variable that clearly determines the outcomes of our clinical processes, \"unintentional hypothermia\" that develops in all patients undergoing an anesthetic or surgical procedure. SEDAR has promoted, in collaboration with other scientific Societies and patient Associations, the elaboration of this clinical practice guideline, which aims to answer clinical questions not yet resolved and for which, up to now, there are no documents based in the best scientific evidence available. With GRADE methodology and technical assistance from the Ibero-American Cochrane Collaboration office, this clinical practice guideline presents three recommendations (weak in favor) for active heating methods for the prevention of hypothermia (skin, fluid or gas); three for the prioritization of strategies for the prevention of hypothermia (too weak in favor and one strongly in favor); two of preheating strategies prior to anesthetic induction (both weak in favor); and two for research.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

  • 文章类型: Journal Article
    BACKGROUND: Italian guidelines for the management of fever in children (IFG) have been published in 2009 and thereafter disseminated in all country. A survey was conducted before their publication and three years later to investigate their impact on knowledge and behaviors of paediatricians.
    METHODS: A questionnaire was administered to convenient samples of paediatricians in 2009 and in 2012, eliciting information about fever definition, methods of temperature measurement, and antipyretic use. Differences in responses between 2009 and 2012 and between paediatricians who were or were not aware of the IFG were evaluated.
    RESULTS: The responses rates were 74% (480/648) in 2009 and 69% (300/434) in 2012. In 2012 168/300 (56%) of participants were aware of the IFG. The proportion of paediatricians who correctly would never suggest the use of physical methods increased from 18.7% to 36.4% (P < 0.001). In 2009 11% of paediatricians declared that the use of antipyretic drugs depends on patient discomfort and did not use a temperature cut off. In 2012 this percentage reached 45.3% (P < 0.001). Alternate use of antipyretics decreased from 27.0% to 11.3% (P < 0.001). Use of rectal administration of antipyretics in absence of vomiting decreased from 43.8% in 2009 to 25.3% in 2012 (P < 0.001). In general, improvements were more striking in paediatricians who were aware of the IFG than in those who were not aware of them.
    CONCLUSIONS: Behaviours of Italian paediatricians improved over time. However, some wrong attitudes need to be further discouraged, including use of physical methods and misuse of rectal administration. Further strategy to disseminate the IFG could be needed.
    导出

    更多引用

    收藏

    翻译标题摘要

    我要上传

       PDF(Sci-hub)

公众号